Military Review

Perimeter System

During the Cold War, both sides were developing highly effective means of electronic suppression of enemy battle controls. Therefore, it was imperative to create a system that would guaranteed to bring combat orders given to the highest echelons of command (the General Staff of the USSR Armed Forces, General Staff of the Strategic Missile Forces) to command posts and launchers of strategic missiles that were on alert. There was also the likelihood of defeat command posts, in the event of the enemy's first nuclear strike. In the process of design work, the idea arose of using a special rocket with a powerful radio transmitting device as a backup communication channel. It could be launched in case of suppression of controls. This missile would be able to give launch commands to all missiles on combat duty in the USSR.

The main purpose of the 15EX601 Perimeter system was the management of a retaliatory nuclear strike and guaranteed delivery of combat orders to individual command posts, launchers, strategic aircraft carrying combat duty, in case of impossibility to use the existing communication lines.

The system used a complex system of sensory sensors to measure seismic activity, air pressure and radiation. This should have made it possible to determine whether a nuclear strike had been inflicted in order to ensure the possibility of a nuclear retaliatory strike without using the “red button”. In the event of the disappearance of the connection with the OVC and the establishment of the fact of the attack, the procedure for launching rockets would be put into action, which allowed the USSR to strike back after its own destruction.

The autonomous command and control system being developed should have the ability to analyze changes in the global military and political environment in order to evaluate the teams that came in during a certain period of time. Based on this, it was concluded that something in the world went wrong. If the system believed that its time had come, then the procedure for launching missiles was initiated.

At the same time, active hostilities should not have started in peacetime, even in the absence of communication or withdrawal of the entire crew from BSP or KP posts. The system should have had additional parameters blocking its operation. Along with the above described extreme algorithm of operation, the system also had intermediate modes.

The development of a special command system was entrusted to Yuzhnoye Design Bureau. 30 August 1974, the government of the USSR signed the corresponding decree N695-227.

Later, the government set another task - to expand the range of functions that the command missile complex solved in order to bring combat orders to strategic missile boats, air force, naval and strategic missile command posts, naval and long-range missile aircraft aviation.

It was originally planned that the MR-UR100 (15A15) rocket will become the base, but later it was replaced with the MP-UR100 UTTH-rocket (15A16). After finalizing the management system, it was assigned the index 15А11.

In December, 1975 was presented the draft design of the rocket control. A special head unit with the index 15Б99 was installed on it, which included the original radio system developed by the OKB LPI. To ensure the necessary conditions of functioning, the head part needed a constant orientation in space.

For aiming the rocket in azimuth, a fully autonomous system with an automatic gyrocompass and a quantum optical gyrometer was used. This system could calculate the primary azimuth for the base direction in the process of setting the rocket on combat duty, store it during combat duty, even in the event of a nuclear effect on the launcher.

26 December 1979 of the year was the first successful launch of a command rocket with a transmitter equivalent installed. Testing was carried out on complex interfacing algorithms for all nodes of the system that took part in the launch, as well as checking the ability of the 15B99 head to adhere to a given flight trajectory - the top of the trajectory was at an altitude of about 4000 m with a range of 4500 km.

In the course of various tests of the Perimeter system, real launches of various missiles that were in service with the Strategic Missile Forces took place, with the help of orders transmitted by the HSN 15B99. On the launchers of these missiles installed additional antennas and receivers. Subsequently, these improvements have affected all launchers and command posts of the Strategic Missile Forces.

Ground checks were carried out at the site of the Kharkov Physics and Technology Institute, the Novaya Zemlya nuclear test site and at the VNIIEF testing laboratories in the city of Arzamas. Here we tested the performance of the entire complex under the influence of the damaging factors of a nuclear strike. As a result of testing, the operability of the hardware complex of SU and SPS with nuclear effects exceeding the one specified in TTT MO was confirmed.

All work on the command rocket was completed by March 1982 of the year. And in January 1985, the complex took up combat duty. After that, command and staff exercises were periodically held in which the Perimeter 15-601 system participated.

In November 1984, the command rocket 15A11 was launched. After the 15B99 head part reached the passive part of the trajectory, a command was issued to launch the 15А14 rocket (Р-36М, PC-20А, SS-18 "Satan") from the NIIP-5 test site at Baikonur cosmodrome. The launch took place in the normal mode: after all the rocket stages had been worked out, it was recorded that the target was hit on the target square on the territory of the Kamchatka Kura test site.

In December, the upgraded system, which operated until June of the 1990 year, took over combat duty on 1995 of the year. The complex was removed from combat duty in the framework of the signed START-1 agreement.

It was a backup communication system, which was used in case of impossibility to use the command system "Kazbek", as well as combat control systems of the Navy, Air Force and Strategic Missile Forces.

It is worth noting that there is no reliable information about the “Perimeter” system in open sources, but according to indirect information it can be assumed that it was the most complicated expert system, consisting of many sensors and communication systems. Apparently, the principle of its action was as follows.

During combat duty, the system receives various data from the tracking systems. Its structure includes both stationary and mobile control centers that provide the main component of the Perimeter system - an autonomous command and control system - a complex software complex created on the basis of artificial intelligence, using a variety of sensors and communication systems to monitor the situation.

In peacetime, all the major nodes are transferred to standby mode to monitor the situation and processing data from measuring posts.

In the case of data transmission from early warning systems indicating a missile strike and the threat of an attack using nuclear weapons, the complex "Perimeter" is transferred to the combat mode, starting to monitor the operational situation.

The system monitors the military frequencies, recording the presence and intensity of negotiations, monitors the data from the EWS, receives telemetry signals from the Strategic Missile Forces, controls the radiation level on the surface. In addition, point sources of powerful electromagnetic and ionizing radiation are tracked along given coordinates, coinciding with seismic disturbances, which indicates multiple ground-based nuclear strikes.

Apparently, after processing all these data, a final decision is made on the need to strike a nuclear strike.

Another option of work is that after receiving data on a missile attack from an early warning system, the system is transferred to combat mode by the first persons of the state. If after this there is no signal about stopping the combat algorithm, then the response strike will be initialized. Thus, it is possible to completely exclude the possibility of a nuclear strike in the event of a false positive. In addition, even after the destruction of all persons with authority to conduct launches, the possibility of retaliation remains.

In the event that the fact of a massive nuclear strike is confirmed with the required accuracy of the sensory components, and the system has no connection with the main command centers of the Strategic Missile Forces, the Perimeter can initiate a retaliatory nuclear strike even bypassing Kazbek, a system that many people know by its most noticeable the node - the “nuclear suitcase” or the subscriber complex “Cheget”.

After the system receives an order from the OVC of the Strategic Missile Forces, or after a command from an autonomous command and control complex, command missiles are launched with a special warhead that can transmit the launch codes to all strategic nuclear weapons carriers on alert.

At all command posts of missile divisions and regiments, special receivers of the RBU of the Perimeter system have been installed, which allow receiving signals from the warheads of command missiles. The stationary central command posts of the Air Force, Navy were equipped with the X-NUMX-15-646-equipment of the Perimeter system for the same purposes. After receiving the signals, they were transmitted further through special communication channels.

The receivers had hardware communication with the control and starting equipment to ensure the immediate execution of the order to launch in a completely autonomous mode, even in the case of the destruction of all personnel.

According to unconfirmed reports, previously, as part of the Perimeter system, there were command missiles created on the basis of the Pioneer MRBM. Such a mobile complex received the name "Horn". The index of the complex itself is 15P656, and the rocket is 15Ж56. There is evidence of at least one unit of the Strategic Missile Forces, which received a set of "Horn" in service. It was the 249 th missile regiment, which was stationed in Polotsk.

And in December, the 1990 th rocket division regiment began combat duty, which received the upgraded Perimeter RC command and control missile system, equipped with a command missile based on the Topol IC-RTB 8PM.

During combat duty, the complex periodically participated in command and staff exercises. The combat duty of the command and missile system 15P011 with the 15А11 rocket (based on MR УР-100) continued until June of 1995, when the START-1 agreement was signed.

Perimeter System

It is worth noting that the introduction of the 15E601 Perimeter system in 1983 did not go unnoticed by the United States, who always closely followed the test rocket launches. 13 November 1984 of the year, during the tests of the command missile 15А11, American intelligence was working hard.

The command missile 15А11 was just an intermediate option that they were going to use only in case of loss of communication between command posts and missile units based throughout the country. It was planned that the rocket would launch from the territory of the Kapustin Yar test site or from one of the mobile installations, and fly over those parts of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia where the missile units are located, giving them launch commands.

But in 1984, the Americans did not have all the information about the strategic missile forces control system. Some details appeared only in the beginning of 1990-s, when one of the system developers moved to the West.

October 8 The 1993 of the Year in the New York Times published an article by Bruce Blair’s columnist entitled “Russian Doomsday Machine”, which revealed some details about the control system of the Soviet missile forces. It was then that the name of the Perimeter system was lit for the first time. It was then that the notion of dead hand appeared in English - “dead hand”, referring to rocket technology.

The system was designed to work in the conditions of the damaging factors of nuclear weapons. There was no reliable way to disable it.

According to Vladimir Yarynich, one of the developers of the system, published in Wired magazine, their system is “dozing” in peacetime, waiting for a signal to be activated in the event of a crisis. After that, monitoring of the network of sensors — radiation, seismic and atmospheric pressure — is launched to detect signs of nuclear explosions. Before initiating retaliation, the system checked four “ifs”. First, it was determined whether there was a nuclear attack on Soviet territory.

Then, the connection with the General Staff was checked. In the case of its presence, an automatic shutdown occurred, as it was assumed that the officials with authority were still alive. But if there was no connection, the Perimeter system immediately transferred the right to make a decision on launch to anyone who was in the command bunker, bypassing numerous instances.

As a rule, officials of our country do not give any comments on the work of this system. But in December, 2011, Lieutenant-General Sergey Karakaev, who is the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, noted that the "Perimeter" still exists and is on combat duty.

According to him, if the need arises for a reciprocal missile strike, the Perimeter system will be able to transmit the necessary signals to the launchers. However, Karakaev stressed that at the moment the probability of the use of a nuclear strike by one of the countries is negligible.

Note that in the West, such a system was called immoral, but still it is one of the factors that can actually prevent a potential preventive crushing nuclear strike.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Tarpon
    Tarpon 27 June 2013 08: 30
    Note that in the West such a system was called immoral

    Here. am
    To destroy others is normal, but to receive in return is immoral.

    The Perimeter system is a must!
    1. 755962
      755962 27 June 2013 11: 35
      the Perimeter system, which received the chilling name of the Dead Hand in the Western press, the last argument of the Soviet (and now Russian) state. Despite the large number and variety of “Doomsday Machines” invented by science fiction writers, guaranteeing retaliation to any adversary and capable of getting and guaranteed to destroy him, only the "Perimeter" really exists.
    2. Civil
      Civil 27 June 2013 17: 42
      in open sources there were even places of the bases of this system, including fortified ones, in general, they will avenge us!
    3. bereg
      bereg 27 June 2013 19: 09
      darling works, and where are the experts who already have everything ruined
    4. Basarev
      Basarev 3 June 2014 16: 55
      It should be modernized, maximizing the developers ’plan - so that the entire system works absolutely automatically, completely out of touch with people. And then a cowardly marshal can easily appear who, even with a massive nuclear strike, will not counterattack.
  2. Dima190579
    Dima190579 27 June 2013 08: 53
    The logic of the West is always immoral to give. Otherwise, you are not a democratic regime and all that if you give tasks
  3. nepopadun
    nepopadun 27 June 2013 08: 55
    We invented a cool thing.
  4. Ivan79
    Ivan79 27 June 2013 09: 36
    +7 "They make spare parts for this product, by the way, in St. Petersburg, and in rather large quantities. And the product itself began to be stamped somewhere in the eighties. And you can relax, it stands and buzzes in the bunkers like cute." "According to Wired magazine in 2009, the Perimeter system is operational and ready to strike back. [3]
    In December 2011, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Lieutenant General Sergei Karakaev said that the Perimeter system exists and is on alert. [17] "
    But nobody seems to tell us the truth about the Perimeter ...
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 27 June 2013 11: 33
      Quote: Ivan79
      In December 2011, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Lieutenant General Sergey Karakaev, stated that the Perimeter system exists and is on combat duty.

      The system has undergone modernization, in particular, the carrier was replaced from "weave" to "Topol", recently in 2011. perhaps an even newer carrier, a new communication, a combat control system, etc. appeared. The system must react quickly and track the characteristic signs of a massive WTO strike (of the Tomahawk type) and not just the use of nuclear weapons on our territory. In general, the principle of operation, characteristics and composition of the system are so secret that even the all-powerful Americans with their CIA learned about it in more detail (and not only that such a system exists) only in the first half of the 90s after fleeing to Vladimir Yarynich in the United States. This is what Yarynich revealed, and we read it in various publicly available sources.
      The Perimeter system itself is an organized system guaranteed, operational control and bringing orders. In each SKP (PKP, MBU) there is an RBU receiver (combat control radio channels) which receives key orders (modes). The frequency range is extensive, there are several receiving antennas and receiving paths. So if the order for the main mode goes to RBU, then missiles are launched automatically without any calculations
      1. neri73-r
        neri73-r 27 June 2013 15: 18
        That's all, I sleep peacefully ....... half, as they are protected from the external enemy, and only internal scum is left for the count and then ...... like a baby !!! fellow
        1. Sirocco
          Sirocco 27 June 2013 17: 33
          Just internal enemies are more dangerous than external ones, so it’s too early to sleep peacefully. stop
      SASCHAmIXEEW 27 June 2013 21: 25
      He will say, he will not say, it doesn’t matter anymore ... FEAR is running! And he is the most important brake for the people !!! The one who fled to the west and told, maybe a mishandled Cossack? Or maybe not ... But FEAR IS !!! And it costs a lot!
  5. deman73
    deman73 27 June 2013 09: 54
    And what’s immoral about her is that the Junkers will come with uncle kirdyk and give over the skull
  6. dmit-xnumx
    dmit-xnumx 27 June 2013 10: 00
    It is wonderful that there is such a system (I even want to write it with a capital letter - it evokes such cautious respect!) In our Country, if only now "the powder in the flasks does not damp"!
  7. FunkschNNX
    FunkschNNX 27 June 2013 10: 39
    Dead Russians are even worse than living tongue
  8. savoj
    savoj 27 June 2013 10: 57
    .... how one wants to be strong, especially dystrophics ..... the war in Chechnya has shown the whole world what the armed forces of Russia represent in conflict with hill tribes.
    1. sanych your division
      sanych your division 27 June 2013 14: 02
      yes ... if we are dystrophic, then your Bundeshren generally ethereal microbes. sit and do not grunt.
    2. mogus
      mogus 27 June 2013 17: 37
      speak for the whole world? Listen to one person
  9. Soviet_Union
    Soviet_Union 27 June 2013 11: 38
    I hope: the system is there, timely modernized and on duty.
  10. Idolum
    Idolum 27 June 2013 12: 32
    It turns out that J. Cameron with his "Skynet" and "Terminators" is a plagiarist ... laughing
    Glory to Russian weapons!
    1. F117
      F117 29 June 2013 21: 53
      Our creators need to take money from him for using their development without the permission of the copyright holder
  11. LM66
    LM66 27 June 2013 13: 20
    For me, it’s such a weapon that with them, that on our part, only complete paranoids could think of
    1. Bongo
      27 June 2013 13: 48
      Rather, those who care about their safety.
    2. Ascetic
      Ascetic 27 June 2013 14: 18
      Quote: LM66
      For me, it’s such a weapon that with them, that on our part, only complete paranoids could think of

      And who told you that this is a weapon? This is just a system of guaranteed delivery of orders and signals and operational control of the situation. The time allotted for the direct launch of missiles (Tp) is the sum of the time allotted for pre-launch operations (Tr), opening packages, entering orders and ciphers, turning keys, etc., which can be different in different conditions (on the march, for example you still need to hang up the APU and conduct a number of modes) and the degree of readiness and time of the APP itself according to the start-up sequence (Ta) which is a constant value. Tp = Tp + Ta. Here, the way to bring an order is not yet taken into account - according to ASBU, wireless telegraph, telephone, etc. So, if it is possible, if it is necessary to strike back or retaliate, to exclude the value of Tp using RBU, then in a situation where the count goes for minutes this is a very important deterrent.
      So what is this paranoid weapon? Indeed, this system is not needed at all for delivering the first strike, but is a deterrent just for paranoids who want to strike the first disarming strike on us. Therefore, they are forced to quietly smoke bamboo and not rock the boat and go along the costly and thorny path of creating a global missile defense and other wunderwafes .
    3. Gato
      Gato 27 June 2013 17: 53
      Even if such a system did not exist, it would be worthwhile to invent, widely advertise and impress upon the enemy that it is and is always on the alert.
    4. Raven1972
      Raven1972 21 July 2013 13: 04
      I'd rather be a LIVING paranoid than a dead idiot hi
  12. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 27 June 2013 13: 49
    <<< Note that in the West such a system was called immoral, but still it is one of the factors that can actually prevent a potential preemptive crushing nuclear strike. >>>
    With such "partners" as the United States, NATO without the "dead hand" system is absolutely impossible! Behind smiles, friendly handshakes, pats on the shoulder, assurances of peace, gentlemen shit-makers constantly hold "a stone in their bosom" and, finally, once and for all the centuries-old Russian question, without the solution of which they cannot imagine their further existence!
  13. kind
    kind 27 June 2013 13: 57
    I would call this system "Rake". Stepped on the Russian "Rake" - get a response in the forehead !!! Moreover, it was reinforced many times over! laughing
    1. Gromily4
      Gromily4 27 June 2013 16: 59
      Yes, "Rake" and even reinforced with a hatchet, this is generally a deadly combination.
  14. sanych your division
    sanych your division 27 June 2013 14: 05
    of course an immoral system! watering with difoliants and napalm is even useful! ask the Vietnamese how they rejoice and thank the "partners" looking at the children of mutants after contacts with overseas democracy for 10 years.
  15. engineer74
    engineer74 27 June 2013 15: 18
    "True, Karakaev stressed that at the moment the probability of a nuclear strike by one of the countries is negligible."
    The key word here is "one", i.e. in case "what" will get everyone? Okay! good
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 27 June 2013 16: 35
      Quote: engineer74
      The key word here is "one", i.e. in case "what" will get everyone? Okay!

      There is one more nuance, if the enemy inflicts the first nuclear weapons, then the main potential of the blow will be directed to our mines, KP, arsenals, infrastructure, and return potential. Ours is counter attack It will be aimed mainly at densely populated areas of the enemy, and geophysically vulnerable places that can provoke natural disasters and destruction. Why shoot at deserted bases and unnecessary control posts in the first place? It is necessary to inflict irreparable damage in the retaliatory strike. So here it’s not chess. Where White starts and wins, but quite the opposite.

      The anecdote is old and vulgar, when others use the word "nuance" and tempts him to tell.
      Petka asks Chapaev:
      - Explain to me what a nuance is?
      “Well, I’d better show you an example.”
      - Like this?
      - And you take off your pants - I will show, and you will understand.

      Petka took off his pants, and Chapaev in his ass and inserted his “instrument”.
      And says:
      - Look, Petka. You have a tool in the ass, and I have a tool in the same place. But there is a nuance! laughing
  16. xomaNN
    xomaNN 27 June 2013 18: 23
    And what a witty approach! I heard rumors in the 90s about this system, but this material is very systematic. Thanks to the author.
  17. Vladimir 70
    Vladimir 70 27 June 2013 19: 14
    I like the logic of the West - bombing without punishment is not immoral, but receiving an answer to aggression is immoral. The West has been, is and will be the main enemy!
  18. uzer 13
    uzer 13 27 June 2013 20: 19
    It was interesting to get acquainted with the details of the retaliatory strike system, the authors should be thanked. Of course, this is not the time to abandon this Russian know-how and the need to have the Perimeter system in service will remain for a long time to come.
  19. crambol
    crambol 27 June 2013 20: 21
    Quote: xomaNN
    I heard rumors in the 90s about this system, but this material is very systematic.

    I was also "lucky" to hear something in those same years. But then I did not understand the essence, but now, comparing the facts and analyzing, I realized that then I ran into the "Perimeter" system. The system is terrible. God forbid!
    1. Yura
      Yura 29 June 2013 20: 12
      Quote: crambol
      The system is scary. God forbid!

      Or vice versa, God forbid, she will answer for us if it happens that we will no longer be, and now this moment - that if we will not be then they definitely will not be and is the main deterrent factor of the "Perimeter", hence the conclusion: the absence of war with us is a guarantee of the existence of our enemy together with its entire population and territory in general.
  20. Rriv
    Rriv 27 June 2013 21: 09
    Interestingly, in the event of the Perimeter being triggered, the target of the retaliatory strike will be the attacking country or all other nuclear powers?
      SASCHAmIXEEW 27 June 2013 21: 34
      I think everyone who has nuclear weapons will get !!!
    2. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 June 2013 12: 01
      The perimeter of the target does not select. Just gives a command to start. What were the goals and their priority in warhead missiles - those will remain. An agreement with the USA on the non-targeting of each other indirect evidence.
  21. mithridate
    mithridate 28 June 2013 02: 26
    the perimeter is a deterrent weapon above all
  22. Andrey77
    Andrey77 28 June 2013 12: 15
    I think everyone who has nuclear weapons will get !!!

    Plus potentially having. We have a lot of missiles. :)
  23. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 29 June 2013 00: 14
    On the Web, I came across a mention of the Perimeter System about a year ago.
    When you get acquainted with the materials for the first time, you feel horror from the sophistication of the system and pride in the Soviet scientists who developed the algorithm of work and introduced it into the work.
    Here are just spelled out in this material:
    In December, the upgraded system, which operated until June of the 1990 year, took over combat duty on 1995 of the year. The complex was removed from combat duty in the framework of the signed START-1 agreement.

    And again "to the snot" it is insulting for such a most natural betrayal.
    The system is defensive, but they agreed to add it to START-1!
    It is strange that it is immediately written that the System is on duty:
    Quote: Ivan79

    In December 2011, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Lieutenant General Sergei Karakaev said that the Perimeter system exists and is on alert. [17] "
    But nobody seems to tell us the truth about the Perimeter ...

    If the system really works, then it turns out that the European missile defense system is set against both the Strategic Missile Forces and the command missiles of the Perimeter.
  24. Letnab
    Letnab 29 June 2013 09: 14
    there would still be a thermonuclear charge on long-term storage off the coast of America and England, and that’s all, even yelling will cease .......
  25. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 4 July 2013 20: 16
    Putin - respect.
    Listen to everyone, smile, bend your line, give a turn to the boors and build up weapons.
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 3 June 2014 17: 15
      You think so, comrade. I am also a supporter of totalitarian militarization!
  26. studentmati
    studentmati 29 July 2013 02: 17
    But in 1984, the Americans did not have all the information about the strategic missile forces control system. Some details appeared only in the beginning of 1990-s, when one of the system developers moved to the West.

    Regular selling "the officer". Ugh !!!! negative
    1. Bongo
      29 July 2013 13: 25
      Rather, corrupt politician.
  27. studentmati
    studentmati 29 July 2013 02: 24
    True, Karakaev emphasized that at the moment, the probability of using a nuclear strike by one of the countries is negligible.

    In no case should you relax !!! Considering the increase in the number of "members" of the Nuclear Club - even more so!
  28. Vadim12
    Vadim12 27 November 2013 13: 08
    Wow! Cool stuff! It will work even if Moscow is no longer there! Great designers came up with.
  29. Evkur
    Evkur 17 March 2014 17: 01
    For me, the weak link here is the rocket itself, which is the source of the "release" of signals, shoot it down and everything is covered with a basin!
    1. ledr
      ledr 22 March 2014 14: 49
      Yes, here you can agree, I hope the developers took into account this too? but even so, and we are bluffing, who will take the chance? I think the Yankees' fear will overcome)))) because they have always been afraid of us, and for them our soul will always remain mysterious, but who knows what to expect from these Russians? they can threaten the current with their sanctions like a yap on an elephant, but for more I think we’re not Syria or Kosovo, they won’t scoop up, they don’t have enough guts. Well, the internal war has been going on for several dozen years, the guys of the current depend on you whether or not to drink it, everyone who has gotten into vodka and beer is slowly dying out, and even here they probably helped us, because natural selection takes place as in nature, the strongest survive, and the new generation grows ingenuously and smart, all the children are very brainy and computerized now, so let's see who is who.
  30. PATRIOT 13
    PATRIOT 13 26 March 2014 16: 36
    they perceived immorality .. Anglo-Saxon .. for me to burn out the whole ball, but not to allow the bankers to fuck the whole world with impunity .. they can only restrain animal fear .. so let them tremble in their snake burrows .. so it was and will be .. while the Russian spirit and will are alive ..