Celebration of the Great Victory. Rewriting the history of the Great War - a weapon against us
We celebrated the brightest holiday for every Russian person - the Day of the Great Victory.
But how do we perceive our main national holiday - Victory Day? Brainwashing 22 of the population of Ukraine did not pass without a trace.
My daughter, 11, graduates from a high school 5 class, occasionally turning to help summarize a textbook topic. stories. You have to be creative, because in every sentence, in every thought of the current school textbook of history, Russophobia is manifest, designed to shape the image of the enemy in the person of Russia. Already from school, our children are inspired by the idea: Russia is the enemy. And so 22 of the year! What is going on in the heads of our children? Our children are taken away from us before our very eyes.
If you look at the youth - those who are now 18-25 years - we find that we are surrounded by a completely different people. No, they are good, good guys and girls. But after talking with these young people, you discover that they are "aliens." This is no longer the traditional problem of fathers and children, it is the substitution of a people by another people.
You can have different attitudes to the predictions of Zbigniew Brzezinski, but even 20 years ago he said: "we will take away your children from you ...". As they say, it is said - done.
In my native Donetsk, which historically is Russian land not only in the aspect of the unity of Russia, but also because the territory of Donbass is the original land of the Don Army, the youth are already embarrassed by their Russianness! Belonging to a great nation, great culture, great history has been considered almost shameful! Belonging to subethnos and marginal provincial culture has become the subject of quiet (and not very) pride!
And this is by no means the principle “say a hundred times to a person that he is a pig — he will grin.” No, thin and run-in technologies work here.
The West has been studying us for a long time. And it does not study like a zoologist studies an elephant: what is the skeleton of an elephant, what is the digestive, nervous systems, etc. The West studies us like a hunter: where the elephant has a heart and how to hit it with one shot (a statement by Andrei Fursov).
The technologies, to the development of which in the West at one time the best minds were involved, in practice proved to be extremely effective. However, they are invisible and act as weapon mass destruction. We can not oppose anything, because we have no response technologies. We also have no information security strategy.
The Russian Orthodox Church and Orthodox public figures offer salvation in Orthodoxy. Yes, this is the most universal and, perhaps, the most reliable way to survive in the information war and preserve its identity. But there is a trap set. The West is attacking the Church with the hands of our local liberals, constantly discrediting the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church through blatant lies. However, the Church was not ready for massive information attacks. And here again looms the ominous figure of Brzezinski. In the 90 years he said: “Communism in Russia is over, now our goal is Orthodoxy.”
But let's talk about the celebration of the Great Victory.
Recently, TRK "Ukraine" has released a film «1941». I will not talk about this fake ... The bottom line is that thoughts are being introduced into the minds of Ukrainian citizens by all means:
1 Stalin, if not unleashed, then provoked the Second World War,
2 people won the war against Stalin,
3 if it were not for Stalin, then there would be no war,
4 Germans in the war just threw corpses
5 Soviet soldiers at the beginning of the war, surrendered to the millions, until Stalin established defensive squads,
6 The Red Army fixed atrocities on German territory in 1945.
7 “bloodthirsty” Stalin conducted brutal repressions against the Orthodox clergy before the War, but, frightened, during the War began to open the temples previously closed and to release priests from the camps,
8 "vile" Stalin divided Poland according to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, etc. etc.
2 people won the war against Stalin,
3 if it were not for Stalin, then there would be no war,
4 Germans in the war just threw corpses
5 Soviet soldiers at the beginning of the war, surrendered to the millions, until Stalin established defensive squads,
6 The Red Army fixed atrocities on German territory in 1945.
7 “bloodthirsty” Stalin conducted brutal repressions against the Orthodox clergy before the War, but, frightened, during the War began to open the temples previously closed and to release priests from the camps,
8 "vile" Stalin divided Poland according to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, etc. etc.
For a man who grew up and was brought up in military memoirs, he read at least part of the memoirs of Winston Churchill, and also listened to the stories of his grandfathers of war veterans, all this orange military historiosophy is an obvious lie. But after all, they are aiming at young people who not only didn’t read, hear or study, but 22 has been under the brainwashing.
So, we have witnessed how the story turned into a specific weapon against us, into a technology of reformatting the consciousness of the people. And the main shock weapon became the history of the Second World War.
I propose to skip through the above points with a simple logic. It is the logic. Thus, everyone, even knowing nothing about the War, will be able to refute the lies about this War.
Stalin, if not unleashed, then provoked the Second World War
It was in the West that tons of literature were published, proving that American financial oligarchs brought Hitler to power. The goal of bringing Hitler to power in Germany, financial pumping the German economy and creating a powerful military machine - world war. In turn, a big war for the United States is a means of writing off foreign debts, strengthening the dollar, destroying competing European economies and national monetary units, obtaining profit from military supplies to belligerent countries, and concentrating the gold reserves of belligerent countries in the USA.
So let's answer ourselves - did Stalin unleash a war? The Roman principle of "who benefits" works iron!
The people won the war in spite of Stalin.
The people, of course, carried the brunt of military hardship and showed massive fighting heroism. But the process of managing military operations in a war of world scope is so complex that no, even the most heroic people, can only withstand the war machine, the military system. This is equivalent to the fact that the French people fought their victorious wars in Europe in spite of Napoleon. Any big war is a confrontation of military and state systems. The Soviet Stalinist military and state system turned out to be stronger than the combined military machine of fascist Europe.
If it were not for Stalin, then there would be no war.
The only fair thesis of the liberals - the thesis that there would be no Stalin - would not have been the Second World War. That's right. The catch for the ignorant lies only in the fact that if it were not for Stalin, then Hitler and the war would not have been lost. Russia was supposed to disappear as a result of the Bolshevik coup 1917. Before the war, the matter simply would not have come. But, contrary to the hopes of the Anglo-Saxons, who were entrusted to the revolution, Stalin revived and multiplied the state and economic potential of Russia already in the Soviet Socialist model.
Germans in the war just threw corpses
In connection with the corpses, which, allegedly, Stalin threw the Germans, there is a dry statistics, recognized by the international Nuremberg process. Soviet casualties are about 9-10 million against German 7,5-8 million. For some reason, the losses of the personnel of the satellite countries of Germany (Italy, Romania, Hungary, Spain) are not taken into account. Soviet citizens who fought on the side of Hitler (Bandera, OUN-UPA, Vlasov, forest brothers). However, the bulk of the losses of the Soviet side accounted primarily for the civilian population.
The Red Army soldiers at the beginning of the war millions surrendered to captivity until Stalin established barrage detachments
For millions of prisoners of war, there is a discrepancy in numbers. Where are all these millions contained and where did they go? For a moment, just try to imagine these millions of prisoners of war. What number of German soldiers would it take to capture them ?! This is reminiscent of Solzhenitsyn's "sensations" about 40-60 million shot by bloody Stalin. Who does not remember - I remind you: when asked where he got the 40-60 million shot, Solzhenitsyn replied that it was all “according to his feelings!” .. I don’t know how massive it was about barrage. My grandfather did not say anything about it. Perhaps, in some decisive cases, when the fate of the whole country and a turn in the war were at stake, this was applied. Mass, clearly, was not. But how the Germans fought "heroically", my grandmother, who survived the occupation, told me. Before being sent to Stalingrad, some German soldiers cried and said: “Stalingrad is Kaput, Stalingrad is Kaput”. They were driven like cattle to the slaughterhouse. But this is far from 1945 and even not 1944! This is the second half of 1942! You can not judge the worst war in the history of mankind by the yardstick of peacetime, watching TV on the sofa with a can of beer in your hand!
The Red Army fixed atrocities on German territory in 1945.
Such information began, for some reason, to emerge just now. Float in striking consistency with the TV movie about the Second World War, which was released at the beginning of the year in Germany. And it came out again, amazingly in sync with the Ukrainian 1941. It is difficult to judge the psychological state of the Russian soldier who passed through the fire of war and, often, having lost a family in the rear. But it is incontrovertible that the atrocities of the Hitler army were not only encouraged, but were purposeful policies aimed at intimidating the population of the USSR. Separate manifestations of cruelty of the Soviet soldiers were not just repulsive, but also qualified as military crimes, for which the tribunal and punishment followed. Examples of punishments can serve as a criminal punishment for the looting of Lieutenant-General Kryukov - the husband of the singer Lydia Ruslanova, as well as the oral accusation of Stalin in the looting of Marshal Zhukov himself. Looting meant some kind of trophy property brought from defeated Germany. This is the fundamental difference between the Soviet laws of Hitler.
The bloodthirsty Stalin conducted brutal repression against the Orthodox clergy before the War. But, frightened, during the War began to open the temples that had been closed before and to release the priests from the camps
Modern liberals do not cease to amaze, like their predecessors - the Bolsheviks. Their profession is as follows: a professional revolutionary, a professional liberal, a professional human rights activist, etc. Ukraine, the country of the victorious liberal-oranzhizma, for example, is unique in that it commemorates both the victims of the famine and the victims of the Stalinist repressions. The victims of the Stalinist repressions in Ukraine are both those who died of hunger 32-33, and those who have repaired this famine. In Russia, propaganda and the state of minds are no better. There, at the same time, the clergy, the Cossacks and the officers, as well as the cannibals and Trotskyists, whom Stalin eliminated, thereby ending the genocide of the Russian people, are considered victims of Stalinist repression. And this is not a paradox, but again the classic Anglo-Saxon technology, according to which all the blame lies on the victim himself. I do not call Stalin a victim, but the Russian people, who are trying to blame for all the troubles. Stalin is only a symbol.
The treacherous Stalin divided Poland according to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, colluding with Hitler
You can make various moral assessments of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, but for us Russians, this is a non-aggression pact that allowed us to delay the start of the war for another couple of years. For Ukraine, this agreement is a fundamental document on the basis of which Ukraine became Ukraine in the form in which we can see it on the map. And the Galician passionary elite subsequently received the opportunity to come to power in this country. The question is not even in the illogical condemnation of this treaty, the abolition of the results of which would mean the return of a good third of Ukraine to its neighbors. At the same time, Galicia would return to Poland. The question is in the black ingratitude of the Oranjoid and a complete lack of understanding that even nowadays the fact of the existence of Russia is a guarantee of the existence of the state of Ukraine. Do not become Russia, even mentally, there will be no dust from Ukraine. It will not even be the dismemberment of Yugoslavia. Ukraine will be pulled apart by neighbors. And even a poor, useless Romania will grab his piece in the form of the Chernivtsi region right up to Odessa and will not disdain! By the way, Moldova and Transnistria will grab.
All this is purposeful politics and the corresponding technology of exterminating the Russian people through information warfare. And the main targets of strikes are the Great Patriotic War and the personality of Stalin, as the main symbols of Russian victories in the twentieth century.
Information