British engineers declassified 1960-s military development

67
British engineers declassified 1960-s military development

The British defense and aerospace company BAE Systems, the heir to British Aerospace, spoke about its unsuccessful military and civilian developments in the 1960-s.

Among the most interesting, but unsuccessful projects of British designers are the three-step analogue of the Shuttle, jumping armored car, flying platforms for launching aircraft from a height and civilian jet airliners with the possibility of vertical take-off and landing.
BAE Systems has created three-dimensional animation illustrating these projects.

The reusable spacecraft project MUSTARD, created in 1965, turned out to be too advanced for its time. British engineers were going to launch into space three interlinked “flying wings”, two of which, being launch vehicles, returned to Earth after launch, and the third could reach the moon. All three stages could land on specially prepared aerodromes: this is the difference between the development and the Shuttle, which was put into orbit by conventional solid-fuel boosters, which then had to be taken out of the ocean. Only half a century later, similar systems were created for suborbital flights, for example, Virgin Galactic Richard Branson’s SpaceShipTwo.

A leaping armored car at BAE began to develop in the early 1960-s on the order of the British military. It was planned that with the help of 12 vertical takeoff engines, an armored jeep could fly over fairly large obstacles. As a result, the project was closed due to the high cost.

An even more unusual project was the platform for vertical takeoff of the P17D. With the help of 56 jet engines, she could lift cargo or combat aircraft into the air. In fact, using such a platform, the Royal Air Force of Great Britain could get rid of the need for military airfields and launch fighters from forest glades and other small platforms. It was also decided to abandon the project due to its high cost.

Perhaps, one of the most ambitious BAE projects of that time was a jet airliner with the possibility of vertical take-off and landing (VTOL). Such a plane, if it appeared these days, would instantly cause a stir among airlines, but in 1960's, BAE engineers came to the conclusion that the plane would consume too much fuel, and the weight of the lifting engines excessively lowers the center of gravity, making it not sufficiently stable in the air. Apparently, the British engineers with their project wanted to compete with Germany, where in 1960-s they constructed a transport plane with a vertical take-off Dornier Do 31, which also did not go into the series. It was not possible to build passenger and transport aircraft with this concept in the USSR, although interest in this topic does not dry up: in 2004, a resident of the village of Marushkino in the Naro-Fominsky district of the Moscow region Valery Sirotin received a patent for the "Passenger supersonic aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing."

As noted in BAE Systems, developments in the field of VTOL are still used by the corporation, including when working with the F-35 fighter.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    20 June 2013 10: 25
    British genius is dangerous .....
    1. +2
      20 June 2013 10: 28
      British insidious genius...
      1. +1
        20 June 2013 11: 09
        Exactly what is dangerous and insidious.
        Only not everything that is written needs to be believed.
        Read in confirmation http://telegrafist.org/2013/06/18/65820/
      2. +5
        20 June 2013 12: 36
        ShturmKGB
        British cunning genius ...

        Quote: Kuygorozhik

        why make people laugh or scare?


        You can come to fame in different ways, as modern British scientists have proved, having earned this well-deserved "fame"



        http://ru.science.wikia.com/wiki/%D0%A8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B
        2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F
    2. rolik
      +3
      20 June 2013 10: 57
      Quote: Kuygorozhik
      British genius is dangerous .....

      And if our declassified projects are declassified (those of which we do not know) ???
      1. +3
        20 June 2013 11: 35
        Quote: rolik
        And if our declassified projects are declassified (those of which we do not know) ???


        why make people laugh or scare? The point is not what the flight of engineering was, the point is that some things should not be published and, moreover, it is not worth creating 3D animation to display unsuccessful projects.
    3. Quiet
      +26
      20 June 2013 11: 29
      British engineers declassified 1960-s military development fellow wassat laughing lol

      If our own are declassified in the 60s, the whole world will tremble and everyone will turn white with horror, even blacks and Japanese wassat

      In those years, in the "Houses of Pioneers", the boys in the "Young Technician" circles did such a thing that their silicone valleys and other sharags still do not dream even in nightmares ... wassat belay fool bully
      1. +7
        20 June 2013 14: 37
        Quote: Quiet
        In those years, in the "Houses of Pioneers", the boys in the "Young Technician" circles did such a thing that their silicone valleys and other sharags still do not dream even in nightmares


        I know, I did it myself. One of the projects implemented was a completely flying ultralight aircraft with an engine from a fire engine pump. In winter, the plane was put on skis and drove along the ice of the river in the city center, as on a snowmobile (without a wing). The people were in shock belay I still wonder how much the Soviet state invested in the development of children's technical creativity. This is not Skolkovo for you! Who does not know google NTTM (Scientific and technical creativity of youth).
        And in the 80s we rode along the corridors of the pioneer palace on an electric car. True, he worked from the outlet smile .
        1. +3
          20 June 2013 18: 19
          how much was invested by the Soviet state in the development of children's technical creativity. This is not Skolkovo for you!
          This is the secret of the Soviet genius - we all come from childhood, all the great inventions and discoveries begin there and if the current state does not want to invest in childhood, then this state has no future.
      2. 0
        20 June 2013 21: 54
        Starting from Tanks-Aircraft and ending with APCs submarines ... By the way, for me, the second is not so stupid.
    4. Anat1974
      +1
      20 June 2013 14: 07
      (I must add) .... for the British.
  2. +7
    20 June 2013 10: 36
    Madhouse. And what is this platform with an airplane? Why is it needed at all? Matryoshka? She takes off the platform, then the plane from her, the rocket from the plane, right?) Grandma for grandfather ...
    1. +5
      20 June 2013 11: 13
      Quote: True
      Madhouse. And what is this platform with an airplane? Why is it needed at all? Matryoshka? She takes off the platform, then the plane from her, the rocket from the plane, right?) Grandma for grandfather ...

      So it is said the same: "unsuccessful projects "of past years. They have become unsuccessful because of a madhouse.

      PS Only the British can brag about the stupidity of their engineers. What is there to be proud of, what to admire ?! But now, they try to PR even on their failures ..

      By the way, if Russia had posted its unsuccessful projects, I think instead of these admiring "O-oo-o!", There would be only ridicule. Although we had no less ambitious projects. Look, the Americans are right now fighting for the RD-170, the "half" of the RD-180 engine from our "unsuccessful" lunar project. How many years have passed, and they still cannot even copy, let alone create their own!
      1. 0
        20 June 2013 11: 46
        Let's remember "Mriya". Buran launch platform.
        1. Quiet
          +2
          20 June 2013 12: 14
          Let's remember "Mriya". Buran launch platform.

          Renat !!! The Lord is with you !!! "Buran" could only be launched from the cosmodrome !!!! The carrier "Energy" !!! belay request ... Apparently you confused him with "Flipper" ??? ... hi
        2. +2
          20 June 2013 12: 22
          Quote: Renat
          Let's remember "Mriya". Buran launch platform.

          This is also a unique project, although it should hardly be considered a failure. The failure befell the USSR, not the Buran project.

          The Mriya was used to transport the Buran and parts of its launch vehicle. And during the tests, she lifted and dropped a full-size model of the "Buran" with the engines turned off, to test its aerobatic abilities in gliding.

          In general, the idea of ​​an air launch has been in the air for a long time, and almost all the main "aircraft building" states have experimented with it. At least R&D was carried out.
          1. +2
            20 June 2013 15: 17
            Quote: Skating rink
            And during the tests, she lifted and dropped a full-size model of the "Buran" with the engines turned off, to test its aerobatic abilities in gliding.


            No Buranas were dropped from Mriya. BTS-001 OK-ML-1 (product 0.01) was used to test the air transportation of the orbital complex. For flight tests used BTS-002 OK-GLI (product 0.02). He took off on his own. Personally, he felt it at the MAX. Excessively inquisitive people picked a lining with a finger and wondered: How could this foam plastic miracle fly into space? They did not know that on this instance thermal insulation (very expensive) was not needed. Instead, imitation was established. The one that was rolled on Mriya stands in Gorky Park, and the BTS-002 was sold to the Germans at the Speyer Museum.
            1. 0
              20 June 2013 19: 59
              Thanks for clarifying!
    2. Quiet
      0
      20 June 2013 12: 10
      what is this platform with an airplane? Why is it needed at all? Matryoshka? She takes off the platform, then the plane from her, the rocket from the plane, right?) Grandma for grandfather ...

      Each of them fulfills only what he was paid for !!!
      1. cartridge
        +3
        20 June 2013 12: 28
        British scientists have created a jumping armored car. Sounds like a joke! laughing
        1. 0
          20 June 2013 21: 58
          It may sound like a joke, but they poked in different directions, just like the United States now, like we did in the days of the USSR, and now our leadership is either so perfect that it always guesses a new trend in military technology, or fills out old trends.
    3. alexkross83
      0
      20 June 2013 12: 53
      Just ... hopping ... plane with armored wik ... or ... armored car from plane .. also jumping wassat recourse
      1. Quiet
        +1
        20 June 2013 13: 30
        Just ... hopping ... plane with armored wik ... or ... armored car from plane .. also jumping

        In general ... both sigat in the bushes after seeing the grenades in the hands of the soldiers .... lol
        1. +2
          20 June 2013 13: 59
          So, who is imprisoned for what:
          ours developed projects of winged tanks, and even in the 30-40s, projects of aircraft submarines, tracked submarines ...
          Germans - aircraft with guns firing up, sideways. Assault rifles bullets from around the corner;
          Well, the British - high-jumping armored cars ...
          ..
          No, normal information. Failure in such matters is rather even luck ... recognized too costly. So save!
          What would the British do with their jumping armored car on the moon? Jump - and there is no armored car, beyond the orbit of Mars already.
          That's it ..
    4. 0
      20 June 2013 16: 37
      Quote: True
      Madhouse. And what is this platform with an airplane? Why is it needed at all? Matryoshka? She takes off the platform, then the plane from her, the rocket from the plane, right?) Grandma for grandfather ...

      And we call xNUMX child prodigy - where is he already up to the British relatives ... laughing
  3. +5
    20 June 2013 10: 39
    The thought of any designer constantly generates a huge number of the most diverse ideas. And the one who becomes a brilliant designer is who, out of all this diversity, creates the final product, which is embodied in metal and brings real benefits.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. Smersh
    0
    20 June 2013 10: 41
    For our benefit, their project failed ..
    1. +1
      20 June 2013 11: 58
      Quote: Smersh
      For our benefit, their project failed ..

      What is the benefit here? The fact that they abandoned deadlock projects? It’s rather a disaster ...
  5. +2
    20 June 2013 10: 42
    British scientists they are so British / scientists .....
    1. +1
      20 June 2013 11: 24
      Quote: screw cutter
      British scientists they are so British / scientists .....

      Once my scientific adviser, who could not transfer the word "scientist" to the spirit, surprised me by distinguishing between "scientist" and "taught". "Scientist" is kind of useless. Yes, they taught - a fact. But the other became "taught", and this one - so ... "unsuccessful project".

      The British make a lot of "pseudo-discoveries", they have fake achievements flourishing. I have already provided the link above.
      1. 0
        20 June 2013 12: 06
        Quote: Skating rink
        Once my scientific advisor, who could not transfer the word "scientist" to the spirit, surprised me by distinguishing between "scientist" and "learned".

        "The scientist cat is walking around in a chain" - this circle can be used to characterize these developments, that's it, the fantasy has run out.
  6. 0
    20 June 2013 10: 43
    A leaping armored car at BAE began to develop in the early 1960-s on the order of the British military. It was planned that with the help of 12 vertical takeoff engines, an armored jeep could fly over fairly large obstacles. As a result, the project was closed due to the high cost.
    Now they want to create something like this for nude airborne forces, it will be interesting to compare ...
    1. +3
      20 June 2013 10: 50
      Yes, no. In general, nonsense. I imagine how they will be sausage there when jumping))))) It turns out useless golden toilet. Although if the attraction is done ...
  7. 0
    20 June 2013 11: 09
    I think our scientists were much crazier than the western ones!
    And all
    our declassified projects to declassify (those of which we do not know) ???
  8. -1
    20 June 2013 11: 15
    And again, not a single word about the boomerang tank
    Navo, he is super secret again bully

    I heard something about the project of the cast-iron bomb
    in folklore in the form of jokes
  9. Vtel
    +2
    20 June 2013 11: 36
    Also something could and mogem.
    Since 1958, "Tu-135" in OKB-156, initiative work began on a strategic strike aircraft system, close in design parameters to M-56 V.M. Myasishchev.
    By the mid-60s, the design work of the Tu-135 system was finally phased out. The main prerequisites for this were: the Air Force abandoned the concept of a single-mode strategic supersonic carrier aircraft and the transition to the idea of ​​creating a multi-mode universal carrier based on a heavy aircraft with a variable wing sweep
    Description
    Design - Design Bureau A.N. Tupolev
    Designation - "135M"
    Type - strategic supersonic bomber
    Take-off weight, kg - 175000 - 205000
    The number of engines - 4
    Engine - DTRDF NK-6
    Maximum engine thrust, kgf - 23500
    Flight speed, km / h (M =) cruising - 2650 (2,5)
    maximum - 3000 (2,82)
    Practical ceiling, m - 19000-22000
    Practical flight range, km - supersonic (2650 km / h) - 7800-8000
    maximum - 10000
    with 1 refueling - 12000
    subsonic (920 km / h) - 12000-13000
    with 1 refueling - 14000-15000
    at low altitudes - 6000

    Practical range with the Kh-22 missile, km - 4400
    Takeoff run, m - 1800

    weaponry
    Cruise missiles X-22 - 4-6
    X-45 - 2-4
    Ballistic missiles - 2-4
    UR "air-to-air" - 4-6
    Bombs
    1. -1
      20 June 2013 14: 04
      And where were his ballistic missiles hidden?
      In the keel?
      Or a horizontal take-off ballistic missile? Then it's cool !!!!
      1. 0
        20 June 2013 22: 47
        Indeed they were. Only aeroballistic. Wingless rocket air-to-surface horizontal launch. After the start, it flies along a ballistic trajectory, that is, it does not use aerodynamic lift. Examples: X-15 and AGM-69 SRAM.
    2. ded10041948
      0
      20 June 2013 16: 05
      Due to the development of this project, the finished T-4 Sukhoi was closed!
  10. 0
    20 June 2013 11: 42
    "Valery Sirotin, a resident of the village of Marushkino, Naro-Fominsk District, Moscow Region"

    M-dya alone, my father tucked the "British scientists" into his belt. I am proud!
    The lack of knowledge of British concepts is the flip side of their originality. After all, the Britons have a mega-reception for increasing the efficiency of scientists. Transfer to another profession from the previous, unproductive. So the British loser-losers are pushing, you need to give birth to at least something to return to the previous status.

    Such a system will not work with us. Tell the domestic creator of uncorruption - for laziness we will send from physicists to biologists - he will be laughing at this subject until retirement.
  11. +2
    20 June 2013 11: 48
    Quote: studentmati
    The thought of any designer constantly generates a huge number of the most diverse ideas. And the one who becomes a brilliant designer is who, out of all this diversity, creates the final product, which is embodied in metal and brings real benefits.


    Greetings, Alexander. hi

    And how many more will be ...
  12. slipped
    0
    20 June 2013 11: 57
    Of all the futuristic developments of that time, the British turned out to be a BAC TSR.2 fighter-bomber

    Really handsome!

    here http://www.dogswar.ru/oryjeinaia-ekzotika/aviaciia/6068-istrebitel-bombardir.htm
    l You can read something about him.
    1. +1
      20 June 2013 12: 41
      Quote: slipped
      Really handsome!

      Yes?
      1. +2
        20 June 2013 14: 11
        Of course, Vladimir, YES.
        Such a handsome man, such a handsome man.
        Look at this truncated wing line! With a flick of the wrist (pilot), the trousers turn ... the trousers turn ... into stinking rags ...
        It is very valuable - that on board marks are applied. Red is a dozen, blue is also good.
        1. +2
          20 June 2013 14: 56
          Quote: Igarr
          Red is a dozen, blue is also good.

          Blue is also an offset.
          1. slipped
            -4
            20 June 2013 15: 17
            But Nitsche, that he has the signs of a modern fifth generation fighter? and years ago ... what then did our generation have, eh?

            I will list (for idiots):
            1. Work on air and land.
            2. Armament in the fuselage.
            3. Elements of invisibility.
            well, etc. etc.
      2. slipped
        -3
        20 June 2013 15: 32
        Yes. Functional and beautiful.
        1. +3
          20 June 2013 15: 44
          From the point of view of aerodynamics and performance, an extremely ugly car. An attempt to achieve supersonic speeds with relatively low-power engines led to a "squeeze midship" and a very small wing area. The result is disgusting take-off and landing characteristics multiplied by an extremely narrow chassis track. British pilots should pray that this miracle of technology did not go into series - otherwise it would be a "flying coffin" worse than the F-104 (which also had a similar concept)
          1. slipped
            -2
            20 June 2013 15: 55
            Well, yes, on the topic - ahead of its time. He would have two-circuit engines. And so, the quote - "In general, many characteristics [...] of the car can only be talked about in a" tentative mood ", since the tests have not been carried out to the end, and many parameters have simply not been confirmed." And about the coffins, our Tu-22 then went into production.
            1. 0
              20 June 2013 16: 08
              Well, then it is worth remembering rather not the "blinder" ... but the Yak 28th (the closest in terms of weight and performance characteristics and is made according to a similar concept) Well, it was created earlier and cost much cheaper, although it was necessary to install a bicycle chassis there ... It was essentially a dead-end path "plane-rocket". But who then could have known this? That's when they stepped on a rake in full growth, then they began to fuss ... The wings of variable geometry were fiddled with, with additional PDs they got confused ...
              1. slipped
                -1
                20 June 2013 16: 48
                Yak-28 was a front-line bomber, and only after a significant alteration of high-altitude interceptor. In fact, 2 different aircraft. In addition, there, by definition, the functionality of a British aircraft was missing.
                1. +3
                  20 June 2013 16: 58
                  "It should be more scrupulous" lol
                  What "scout-bomber" functionality was missing in the Yak 28?

                  We look closely:
                  Yak-28 first serial modification
                  Yak-28B variant with Lotos and Initiative radar.
                  Yak-28L variant with DBS-2S "Lotos" radio command differential-range guidance system.
                  Yak-28I is a variant with an integrated weapons control system consisting of: Initiative-2 radar, OPB-116 optical sight and AP-28K autopilot.

                  Yak-28N version with the K-28P weapon system, which included two X-28 anti-radar missiles and control equipment.

                  Yak-28R reconnaissance variant based on the Yak-28.
                  Yak-28RR radiation scout.

                  Yak-28PP plane jammer.

                  Yak-28U training aircraft. NATO code designation - Maestro

                  Yak-28P fighter-interceptor.

                  Well, find at least a part of this "functional" in an aircraft that existed (in contrast to the Yak) in the amount of THREE prototypes that did not even have weapons?

                  Learn materiel and you will be happy.
                  1. slipped
                    -6
                    20 June 2013 17: 14
                    Quote: Taoist
                    "It should be more scrupulous" lol
                    What "scout-bomber" functionality was missing in the Yak 28?

                    ......

                    Learn materiel and you will be happy.


                    In how, I painted everything - a bunch of different planes for one British. :) You would have to tighten a little sapromat, about quantity and quality, and with your head will learn to think ... too. :) And I know the materiel, only I fly higher than these pepelats.
                    1. +3
                      20 June 2013 17: 39
                      So, for reference, I taught sOpromat at a military school which I graduated with an average score of 4,78 in the specialty "Aircraft and HELL Operation". So who flies higher than what ... (at least on the avatar my photo is in my completely legal form) But what about the fact that "a bunch of different planes against one British?" I'll tell you a "terrible secret" - it's all one plane with only different sets of avionics ... Just like it was everywhere in the world. And "universal soldiers" do not exist, "this is a fantasy sonny" ...
                      1. slipped
                        -3
                        20 June 2013 17: 56
                        "Look, it's like Semyonich ..." So you need to be able to think with your head, the conversation in this topic is about unrealized concepts, and you offer me a "herring in a fur coat" and your pipiska is longer ...
                      2. +3
                        20 June 2013 18: 11
                        That is why you should not praise an airplane that has not even really flown. In the British aircraft industry there were enough much more successful and interesting developments. Although with a specific "British accent" - but there is such a thing as "design school". Unrealized concepts are a dime a dozen - there are few successful cars. And even more so, you shouldn't be rude to the interlocutor - this, in general, only speaks about your level.
                      3. +2
                        20 June 2013 18: 37
                        No, but I liked this young man ...
                        Especially because the quasi-fifth generation bomber ... weapons inside the hull.
                        I then, in simplicity of my soul, thought - over the cockpit will be.
                        But ours, the Petlyakovs and Tupolevs, did not know ...
                      4. slipped
                        -3
                        20 June 2013 18: 43
                        thank you for the young man, my dear :) there is no Google to go about the plane? only know how to chat?
                        Then I will help you, here's a hint, an article http://vremena.takie.org/news/pokolenija_bombardirovshhikov_okonchanie/2013-03-2
                        4-47 read if possible
                      5. +1
                        20 June 2013 22: 23
                        Come on, a typical "modern product" - knowledge was replaced by Google, the native language "Albansky", the assessment of technology according to the criterion "but I like it" ... God bless him.
                      6. slipped
                        -4
                        20 June 2013 18: 46
                        Quote: Taoist
                        And it’s all the more not worth it to be rude to the person you are talking to - this, in general, is only talking about your level.


                        This first of all speaks of your level, my dear. The fact that I personally like this concept, which side are you on? I do not like it, well, to hell with it, but you don’t need to breed a flood in the topic.
  13. 0
    20 June 2013 12: 02
    Quote: Aryan
    In 2004, Valery Sirotin, a resident of the village of Marushkino, Naro-Fominsk District, Moscow Region, received a patent for "Passenger supersonic aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing".

    There are still talents on the Russian land!

    Quote: Aryan
    As a result, the project was closed due to the high cost.

    They think, let the Russians finish it. They will bring to perfection, and then we will steal, buy, lick.
    Quote: Aryan
    It did not work to build passenger and transport aircraft with this concept in the USSR, although interest in this topic does not run low
  14. 0
    20 June 2013 14: 32
    The only thing I liked from the article: 3-module shuttle. I don’t know about the high cost, but for the environment there is a big "+".
    1. slipped
      +1
      20 June 2013 17: 41
      But for the output PN, a big and bold minus is one percent of the total weight of the system. And it’s not so simple with ecology.
  15. 0
    20 June 2013 14: 42
    Research and development of the creation of new equipment and weapons always have dead-end projects.
    According to the principle, who works is sometimes mistaken.
    We recently also considered the "fiery hedgehog development of 1944.
    For the researcher there is no unnecessary, always acquired useful experience.
  16. 0
    20 June 2013 14: 47
    let them fail but whoever never fell he never rose
  17. -1
    20 June 2013 15: 24
    somewhere taxpayer money was sawn off, somewhere they really wanted to get ahead of time ... (like our bunch of Energy-Buran, analog-Space Shuttle is somewhere nearby, but only nearby)
  18. 0
    20 June 2013 17: 04
    if in the 60s nothing happened then on what in the 2000s they will hold on. Americans will help with the Japanese.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. +1
    20 June 2013 19: 14
    A little off topic, or maybe, on the contrary, shorter. I downloaded a complete file of the magazine "technology of youth" for nostalgic reasons. Of course, a trifle, but only in Germany the patent for this device was registered by BOSH only 60 years later. And a whole heap of such trifles is typed, I checked selectively the benefit of Google in the house everyone has.
  21. evil
    -1
    20 June 2013 20: 59
    if yes, if only mushrooms would grow in the mouth, and there would be no mouth but a whole garden

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"