"Left-defenders" on the march, or the Big Blende
A relatively recent law on non-profit organizations, which stipulates that an organization receiving funding from abroad and conducting political activities (opinion polls in particular) on the territory of the Russian Federation, must continue to call itself an NGO-foreign agent, forced representatives of these NGOs wrestle in finding workarounds. According to tradition, representatives of such organizations didn’t want to look the truth, and therefore they decided to bypass the letter of the law, as modern lawyers and legal advocates rely on ... As they say, jurisprudence and the right are in the first place ...
They broke their wild heads, broke, and invented something. It is not yet known for certain who had a bright thought about the departure from the status of the other agent (Lyudmila whether Alekseeva from MHG, Lily whether Shibanova from Golos or someone from Levada) is not so important. It is important that these gentlemen, who consider themselves to be the guardians of the law, try to spit on this very law. And frankly, and even with poking a finger in the direction of opponents - they say, it's all about them, we are forced ...
The idea of leaving looks like this (a Kommersant newspaper was told by someone who asked not to give his surname a friend): NKO, which used to receive money for its activities from foreign countries, can now give up foreign financing altogether. But this is only official. In fact, the semi-legal scheme begins to curl up with a kind of fraud: along with the refusal, a kind of subsidiary structure is created in which all the same NPO employees will work. At the same time, such a structure will not engage in any political activity, but will, for example, be engaged in studying the seasonal changes in the numbers of birds in the North Caucasus or in the Kuril Islands. To this “daughter”, foreign “sponsors” redirect their financial flows, as if supporting the work on studies of the population of birds - no policy, they say. And this “daughter” will be nothing but, to say the least, share the funds received from foreign patrons directly with that non-profit organization that is somehow connected with political activity. And the word “share” here does not even look entirely correct, because the employees of the “daughter” and at the same time the employees of the NPO will share themselves with themselves. And then let someone say that the ideas of the great combinator do not find their application ... Find! And how to find!
In this regard, I recall the slogan, which has recently been actively exploited by various "swamp" activists, among whom one can see those who consider the law on NGOs to be directed against themselves. This slogan could again be seen on the streets of the capital on the so-called "March against the Executioners" on Wednesday: "Russia without crooks and thieves."
So at the same time you need to be honest with yourself - after all, such florid attempts to escape from the execution of the law, which were described above, are the very real terry scam. If Russia is without crooks, then you had to start with it then ... And Russia without thieves, as you know, is utopia in general ...
Gentlemen who have invented a scheme for spitting on Russian legislation are not going to start with themselves, because they consider themselves to be crystal clear - with angelic literal plumage. At the same time, opposition speeches under a banner with the inscription “Russia with the rule of law”, when this same law was just called for not to give a penny, truly touches ... Our valiant megaliberal similarity to the opposition, of course, is still looking for itself. But the inconsistency of the steps painfully reveals. And this inconsistency has already frightened even supporters. The proof is the same “March against the executioners”. According to the latest data, about 10 of thousands of people went to this march (according to the Moscow Central Internal Affairs Directorate - less than 6 thousand), and only Yashin with Navalny assured that thirty thousand "dissenters" felt behind their breath ... well - when people follow you with rainbow flags, covering their mini-gay parade with the term “march”, Yashin, Navalny and others could feel more than thirty thousand in other places ...
In general, the creative again zaskvil from all mega-position slits, although thematic diversity, he clearly did not differ. Those “human rights activists”, very concerned about the situation in which their organizations need to make a “foreign agent”, passed in orderly rows interspersed with LGBT activists in Moscow. It turns out that these human rights defenders are concerned exclusively with their own rights, and they don’t care a damn about the rights of anyone else (for example, the right to know that they operate on Western funds). What are examples of this? Yes, they are, in fact, the sea.
Take, for example, slogans about the release of so-called political prisoners. Whom we see in the portraits: Pussy Riot, Lebedev, Khodorkovsky and Udaltsov ... But if the protesters claim that there are political prisoners in Russia, then why not a single portrait could be seen on the march, for example, Khabarov or Kvachkov. Or have these officers gotten to jail rightly and without political motivation? .. Where are the human rights activists? Why are they silent?
But they are silent, because Kvachkov and Khabarov are not the people whose freedom is in the interests of foreign sponsors of Russian “human rights” NGOs. In the words “Freedom to Colonel Kvachkov!” Neither in the USA nor in Great Britain it’s impossible to get political bonuses, by definition, and therefore it’s much more convenient to recall the “politicity” of the process over some Tolokonnikova, which of all the “achievements” dancing naked on the fountain and sex in the museum. Political hero, forgive my God ... Well, as they say, what kind of heroes ...
And in general, it seems that the very activity of our NGOs otmazyvayuschihs from the status of foreign agents is concentrated only in two capitals and, from time to time, in the regions of the North Caucasus. Apparently, all the other regions do not fall into the sphere of interests of our valiant political NGOs. Of course, it’s much more spectacular to go out with colored balloons to popiaritsya in Moscow, rather than actually helping to protect the rights of residents of provincial regions. Where are all these human rights activists are when it turns out that thousands of war veterans are still without their own well-equipped housing? Why do we not hear any human rights activists from NGOs at the moment when they are planning to make the second Norilsk, choking on environmental problems, from the heart of the Russian Chernozem region? And what prevents human rights defenders from protecting the rights of Russians who have returned from abroad under the announced program to their homeland, but for years they cannot even get a residence permit, not to mention a Russian passport? Or is it a human rights activity that does not have PR power, equal power to protect the rights of gay, lesbian or extremist underground ...
In this regard, it is possible to quote the official representative of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Vladimir Markin:
This time it’s hard to disagree with Markin. If human rights NGOs are concerned only with their status and try to serve exclusively external interests, then these are already some kind of defense counsel (please do not confuse with the defenders of political leftists) or foreign advocates. And if so, then you can invent any kind of schemes for avoiding the execution of the law, but it’s impossible to get away from the fact of your dependence on external sources. Is that only in the quality of complacency: they say, no one will know ... But the secret becomes clear.
They broke their wild heads, broke, and invented something. It is not yet known for certain who had a bright thought about the departure from the status of the other agent (Lyudmila whether Alekseeva from MHG, Lily whether Shibanova from Golos or someone from Levada) is not so important. It is important that these gentlemen, who consider themselves to be the guardians of the law, try to spit on this very law. And frankly, and even with poking a finger in the direction of opponents - they say, it's all about them, we are forced ...
The idea of leaving looks like this (a Kommersant newspaper was told by someone who asked not to give his surname a friend): NKO, which used to receive money for its activities from foreign countries, can now give up foreign financing altogether. But this is only official. In fact, the semi-legal scheme begins to curl up with a kind of fraud: along with the refusal, a kind of subsidiary structure is created in which all the same NPO employees will work. At the same time, such a structure will not engage in any political activity, but will, for example, be engaged in studying the seasonal changes in the numbers of birds in the North Caucasus or in the Kuril Islands. To this “daughter”, foreign “sponsors” redirect their financial flows, as if supporting the work on studies of the population of birds - no policy, they say. And this “daughter” will be nothing but, to say the least, share the funds received from foreign patrons directly with that non-profit organization that is somehow connected with political activity. And the word “share” here does not even look entirely correct, because the employees of the “daughter” and at the same time the employees of the NPO will share themselves with themselves. And then let someone say that the ideas of the great combinator do not find their application ... Find! And how to find!
In this regard, I recall the slogan, which has recently been actively exploited by various "swamp" activists, among whom one can see those who consider the law on NGOs to be directed against themselves. This slogan could again be seen on the streets of the capital on the so-called "March against the Executioners" on Wednesday: "Russia without crooks and thieves."
So at the same time you need to be honest with yourself - after all, such florid attempts to escape from the execution of the law, which were described above, are the very real terry scam. If Russia is without crooks, then you had to start with it then ... And Russia without thieves, as you know, is utopia in general ...
Gentlemen who have invented a scheme for spitting on Russian legislation are not going to start with themselves, because they consider themselves to be crystal clear - with angelic literal plumage. At the same time, opposition speeches under a banner with the inscription “Russia with the rule of law”, when this same law was just called for not to give a penny, truly touches ... Our valiant megaliberal similarity to the opposition, of course, is still looking for itself. But the inconsistency of the steps painfully reveals. And this inconsistency has already frightened even supporters. The proof is the same “March against the executioners”. According to the latest data, about 10 of thousands of people went to this march (according to the Moscow Central Internal Affairs Directorate - less than 6 thousand), and only Yashin with Navalny assured that thirty thousand "dissenters" felt behind their breath ... well - when people follow you with rainbow flags, covering their mini-gay parade with the term “march”, Yashin, Navalny and others could feel more than thirty thousand in other places ...
In general, the creative again zaskvil from all mega-position slits, although thematic diversity, he clearly did not differ. Those “human rights activists”, very concerned about the situation in which their organizations need to make a “foreign agent”, passed in orderly rows interspersed with LGBT activists in Moscow. It turns out that these human rights defenders are concerned exclusively with their own rights, and they don’t care a damn about the rights of anyone else (for example, the right to know that they operate on Western funds). What are examples of this? Yes, they are, in fact, the sea.
Take, for example, slogans about the release of so-called political prisoners. Whom we see in the portraits: Pussy Riot, Lebedev, Khodorkovsky and Udaltsov ... But if the protesters claim that there are political prisoners in Russia, then why not a single portrait could be seen on the march, for example, Khabarov or Kvachkov. Or have these officers gotten to jail rightly and without political motivation? .. Where are the human rights activists? Why are they silent?
But they are silent, because Kvachkov and Khabarov are not the people whose freedom is in the interests of foreign sponsors of Russian “human rights” NGOs. In the words “Freedom to Colonel Kvachkov!” Neither in the USA nor in Great Britain it’s impossible to get political bonuses, by definition, and therefore it’s much more convenient to recall the “politicity” of the process over some Tolokonnikova, which of all the “achievements” dancing naked on the fountain and sex in the museum. Political hero, forgive my God ... Well, as they say, what kind of heroes ...
And in general, it seems that the very activity of our NGOs otmazyvayuschihs from the status of foreign agents is concentrated only in two capitals and, from time to time, in the regions of the North Caucasus. Apparently, all the other regions do not fall into the sphere of interests of our valiant political NGOs. Of course, it’s much more spectacular to go out with colored balloons to popiaritsya in Moscow, rather than actually helping to protect the rights of residents of provincial regions. Where are all these human rights activists are when it turns out that thousands of war veterans are still without their own well-equipped housing? Why do we not hear any human rights activists from NGOs at the moment when they are planning to make the second Norilsk, choking on environmental problems, from the heart of the Russian Chernozem region? And what prevents human rights defenders from protecting the rights of Russians who have returned from abroad under the announced program to their homeland, but for years they cannot even get a residence permit, not to mention a Russian passport? Or is it a human rights activity that does not have PR power, equal power to protect the rights of gay, lesbian or extremist underground ...
In this regard, it is possible to quote the official representative of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Vladimir Markin:
Alas, numerous publicists and human rights activists in fact often turn out to be agents of destructive and not at all legal ideas. In our country, human rights advisers support notorious extremists, putting them on a par with defenders of not only the state, but also the legal order. Or another recent example is frank lobbying by experts on the law of the interests of those convicted of serious crimes, and, as it turns out, not unselfishly. It’s a paradox, but note-based human rights activists are guided by revolutionary legal consciousness, even to the extent that the worse for the state, the better for the cause of the next revolution.
This time it’s hard to disagree with Markin. If human rights NGOs are concerned only with their status and try to serve exclusively external interests, then these are already some kind of defense counsel (please do not confuse with the defenders of political leftists) or foreign advocates. And if so, then you can invent any kind of schemes for avoiding the execution of the law, but it’s impossible to get away from the fact of your dependence on external sources. Is that only in the quality of complacency: they say, no one will know ... But the secret becomes clear.
Information