Kazakhstan intends to acquire two A-400M and two additional C-295 aircraft

43
Kazakhstan intends to acquire two A-400M and two additional C-295 aircraft

During the official visit to Kazakhstan of Spain’s Minister of Defense Pedro Morenés, the Kazakh side expressed its intention to acquire two additional aircrafts BTA C-295 manufactured by Airbus Militi.

On this, as the agency EFE, said the representative of the Ministry of Defense of Spain.

In March, 2012 of the year, Airbus Militery entered into a contract with the state company Kazspecexport belonging to the Ministry of Kazakhstan of Kazakhstan to supply two C-295, as well as related services, spare parts and equipment. At the same time, a memorandum of understanding was signed on the purchase of 6 additional C-295, contracts for the supply of which must be signed in the coming years.

According to EFE, Kazakhstan’s Defense Minister Adilbek Dzhaksybekov also expressed interest in buying two A-400M aircraft.

In January of this year, the park aviation Kazakhstani army’s equipment was replenished with the first two military transport aircraft S-295M manufactured by Airbus Military. Kazakhstan Engineering National Company JSC plans to organize service maintenance of S-295 and A-400M aircraft on the basis of the aviation technical center being created in Astana.

During a visit to 10-11 in June, the ministers of defense of Spain and Kazakhstan signed a memorandum on military and military-technical cooperation, the purchase of defense products, military education, research and development and logistic support.

The ministers reached an agreement on the participation of Spanish enterprises in the KADEX arms exhibition, which will be held in Astana in 2014.

According to P.Morenes, representatives of the Armed Forces of Kazakhstan will be able to receive training at the CESEDEN Higher Center for National Defense Studies (Centro Superior de Estudios de la Defensa Nacional). Spain plans to send its observers to participate in the Steppe Eagle peacekeeping exercise, which will be held in Kazakhstan in August of this year.

During the visit, P.Morenes visited the national company Kazakhstan Engineering, where he was provided with information about the structure, goals, objectives and projects implemented, as well as created jointly with the Spanish company Indra Sistemas. Kazakhstan Engineering, focused on the production, final assembly, repair and maintenance of radar stations, electronic warfare systems, electronic intelligence and other electronic equipment.

The Minister of Defense of Spain also visited the airborne assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Kazakhstan and got acquainted with the armaments of military hardware that are in its armament.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    13 June 2013 13: 32
    Kazakhs, of course, well done, the vector is set correctly. Here is the visual result - while we are discussing the supply of Anovs here and meeting the recycled Ilami, our neighbors and allies are buying foreign machinery.
    1. +18
      13 June 2013 13: 45
      I’m glad for Kazakhstan, but it seems to me buying different equipment from different countries will its service, operation and training and education of specialists then pour into a haemorrhage? This applies not only to the Air Force, there are a lot of things bought there in the artillery and infantry. hi
      1. +9
        13 June 2013 15: 20
        Quote: seasoned
        I’m glad for Kazakhstan, but it seems to me buying different equipment from different countries will its service, operation and training and education of specialists then pour into a haemorrhage? This applies not only to the Air Force, there are a lot of things bought there in the artillery and infantry. hi

        Hemorrhoids become in other cases when you purchase equipment from one country. Then this is a real problem, this country will be able to put pressure on you and force you to buy spare parts at inflated prices, etc. And if you have a bad relationship, then goodbye to all the technology, a vivid example of Iran and Venezuela when the USA laughing
      2. VAF
        VAF
        +15
        13 June 2013 16: 38
        Quote: seasoned
        Glad for Kazakhstan


        I fully support! +! That would be our example to take .. in everything !!! soldier

        Quote: seasoned
        buying different equipment from different countries will its service, operation and training and education of specialists then pour into a haemorrhage?


        Absolutely not pour out, because Firstly, he is buying the TECHNIQUE .... example?
        Please ... what is really S-295M bully ..TELL:

        On April 15.04.2013, 2, Airbus Military and MBDA successfully demonstrated the launch of the Marte Mk295 / S anti-ship missile from the underwing pylon of the Airbus Military C-XNUMXMPA marine patrol aircraft.

        This flight was the "last" flight in a series of studies conducted as part of a joint collaboration between Airbus Military and MBDA to test the integration of the Marte missile into the C-295.

        The underwing weapon suspension provides new operational capabilities for the S-295MPA aircraft to perform new tasks required by customers. good

        In the anti-submarine role, the S-295 already (!!!!) uses Mk46 torpedoes. good

        This successful test provides further evidence of the operational flexibility of the Marte missile and clearly establishes it as a reference for a medium-weight anti-ship missile.

        The Marte Mk2 / S missile is already integrated on the Italian Navy AW-101 and NH90 NFH helicopters; Marte ER is currently being integrated on the Eurofighter Typhoon fighter.

        Missile MBDA Marte MK2 / S operates on the principle of "shot-and-forget," an all-weather anti-ship medium-range system equipped with an inertial and radar guidance system, capable of destroying small ships and causing great damage to large ships.
        The missile has a weight of 310 kg and a length of 3,85 m.

        Now remember the recent fellow news .. "about the adoption of the new aircraft An-140 ???? belay crying
        I won’t say anything further!

        Only now, Kazakhstan, in fact, already has MRA and Antisubmarine in the Caspian ... attention to the question ... what do we have? wassat

        well besides the glory of Pu Russia rises from its knees, etc. request
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +4
          13 June 2013 16: 43
          Quote: vaf
          On April 15.04.2013, 2, Airbus Military and MBDA successfully demonstrated the launch of the Marte Mk295 / S anti-ship missile from the underwing pylon of the Airbus Military C-XNUMXMPA marine patrol aircraft.


          photo start does not want to attach ..... I try again!

          1. +4
            13 June 2013 16: 51
            Quote: vaf
            Quote: vaf
            On April 15.04.2013, 2, Airbus Military and MBDA successfully demonstrated the launch of the Marte Mk295 / S anti-ship missile from the underwing pylon of the Airbus Military C-XNUMXMPA marine patrol aircraft.


            photo start does not want to attach ..... I try again!


            And now some will say that they are painted))))
            1. VAF
              VAF
              +7
              13 June 2013 16: 59
              Quote: Atrix
              And now some will say that they are painted))))


              Thank you, +! drinks and these .... these may be important to them fellow and yes we are ... and the rest ... "Klava" will endure everything! lol
        2. Avenger711
          -11
          13 June 2013 18: 23
          Well, that’s it, Kazakhstan will defeat everyone.
          Antisubmarine in the Caspian. laughing Despite the fact that the entire Caspian is easily covered by aviation from coastal bases.

          What is there to take from Kazakhstan as an example, is somehow little understood. Buy an imported plane? You’ll be the first to yell that you don’t do your own thing.
          According to An-70, we contributed our share, as a result, too much confirmation that nothing can be done together with Ukraine.

          In general, your nagging is already tired. It’s as if without you we know that everything is bad, the same is news to me. And from whining neither the factories collapsed during the 90s and the lost technology will not be restored, they will not disappear in the army either.
          1. +10
            13 June 2013 19: 44
            Whining? Here no one whines, this time
            Two of them take off their pink glasses from those that agully claim that they are all in a bunch and in everything, and then slurp the goryushka as in Ossetia.

            Here in this article we discuss a specific transport aircraft, according to the characteristics of which we unfortunately have nothing
            Kazakhs did not wait for their ancient Ana to begin to fall from old age wear and buy a great alternative

            You can’t do everything yourself, it’s impossible, so you need to create joint JVs for the technologies that we are behind in (even in the USSR, special units of the GRU and the KGB scoured the world in search of technology)
            Or another option is to beat in the chest, tear the vest on the chest, send all obscenities and fly on An-26 planes risking at any moment not only the lives of the crews and the military personnel they are transporting
        3. +4
          13 June 2013 19: 59
          Sergei welcome !!! For a long time it was not heard and, as always, your comments were lacking. Yesterday, the article was about the A400M and people were surprised at the similarities with the AN70 ...
        4. +2
          14 June 2013 05: 19
          I support completely and completely - the glorifications do not pass into the quality work of neither the glorifying nor the glorious
    2. +9
      13 June 2013 15: 05
      Kazakhstan takes one of the best dealsreplacing its obsolete AN-26

      the same AN-140 or AN-32B, lagging behind the C-295, well, I think they want to take the A400M, in addition, excellent aircraft of the same manufacturer

      while we are in the midst of a showdown with Ukraine over the AN-70, the planned delivery within the framework of the state defense order (70 units until 2020) to the Russian Air Force is already unlikely - here the question is, as if the main customer hadn’t refused

      ps-naturally you need to understand that the appearance of similar machines in our Air Force is not yet possible, unless there is political will (although under Serdyukov at one time there was a question about purchasing 295 and creating a joint joint venture)
      as well, the Kazakh Air Force began to receive good aircraft, replacing the obsolete AN-26 and probably the remaining AN-74P

      PHOTO - In flight А400М
      And video marine version of the C-295MPA for the Navy of Chile
    3. +5
      13 June 2013 19: 15
      Quote: kirieeleyson
      while we are discussing the supply of Anovs here and we meet with Ilami recycled - our neighbors and allies are buying foreign machinery.

      I can argue that if there weren’t this dirty story with An, Russia and Ukraine would have bought these planes for their aircraft. The Kazakhs would have bought them the same !!
      That's how we lose our place in the market and money, not to mention the image .....
  2. Avenger711
    -13
    13 June 2013 13: 34
    Well, do not take the An-70.
    1. +5
      13 June 2013 16: 33
      And how do you like this?
      1. +3
        13 June 2013 18: 21
        people of what kind and 400 see the vidos about Pak Fa to see such a maneuver at least once
        1. +5
          13 June 2013 19: 11
          Quote: Kair501
          people of what kind and 400 see the vidos about Pak Fa to see such a maneuver at least once

          That's when it will be in the same quantities as F22 then we can talk about something. And yes, a priori, the T50 should in some way be better than the F22, because the age difference is almost 10 years.

          Grade video
          1. Alexander D.
            0
            14 June 2013 00: 13
            The age difference is much greater - the first tests of the 22nd were in 1996-1997, and in 2003 serial aircraft were already delivered to airbases.
          2. -2
            16 June 2013 13: 36
            Quote: Atrix
            Grade video

            Propaganda bullshit!
            Imagine how the last aircraft take off in a cloud of exhaust gases.
            This is why takeoff is not shown here. On the latest aircraft, tires would still light up on the ground !!!
  3. +6
    13 June 2013 13: 35
    And I look, Kazakhs have money for new transport planes! Well done.
    In Belarus, with money, we have full J. With two Ps, moreover.
  4. +5
    13 June 2013 13: 41
    The main thing is that these purchases do not affect our security ... Otherwise, today there are transport aircraft, tomorrow ground military equipment, then combat aircraft, and then it is not far to the military base. I hope I am exaggerating, but somehow I feel uneasy from the words "representatives of the Armed Forces of Kazakhstan will be able to undergo training at the Higher Center for Research on National Defense of Spain" count in NATO.
    1. Marek Rozny
      +6
      13 June 2013 23: 23
      Quote: Orel
      And then today transport aircraft, tomorrow land military equipment, then combat aircraft, and then to the military base is not far.

      The Kazakh army is armed with a bunch of equipment and weapons of Western production, for example, Eurocopter (two types) and Huey-II helicopters, Cobra Otokar, Humvee, Land Rover armored vehicles, various small arms (Czech, Austrian, German, Italian pistols, snipers and CZ machine guns , MP-5, Beretta ARX-160, etc.). At the same time, Russian military goods are also purchased. Also, the repair / modernization of the Soviet "legacy" is constantly being carried out.
      However, this does not mean at all that the Kazakhs are going to establish a NATO military base. If you bought a LG TV home, this does not mean that you decided to become a Korean.
      Quote: Orel
      It is somehow uncomfortable to say "representatives of the Armed Forces of Kazakhstan will be able to undergo training at the Higher Center for Research on National Defense of Spain", count in NATO.

      Kazakh cadets study not only in Russia, but also in NATO countries (including the American West Point) and Asia (South Korea, China). Russian cadets do not receive anything other than Russian / Soviet military education. I do not argue, this is an excellent military school. But the Kazakhs strive to take the best from everywhere and apply it at home. Kazakhs know well how to train PLA or NATO officers. It can always come in handy if suddenly (God forbid, of course) a war happens. As a result, the Kazakhstani army knows all the pros and cons of military education in the USSR / RF, West and Asia.
      Let me remind you that the Kazakhs spent several years in Iraq - they did not directly participate in the hostilities / patrols, they were only engaged in mine clearance and provided medical assistance to local residents. Over the years, we have carefully studied how the American army acts in combat conditions - how it fights, how it lives, what it eats, how it sleeps, how sorry it is. They learned everything about the American army in the field, after which they left Iraq and did not intend to return there anymore.
      Kazakh officers know how Russians are fighting, and how NATO is fighting. Is this a minus for us or not? I think you yourself agree that this is a plus.
      And we don’t have any secrets from Russia that we buy foreign equipment - I hope the Russians have already arrived, felt different goods bought by the Kazakhs and looked at what ideas could be borrowed for their own military industry. Yes, and Stopudovo ours already shared their experience and observations made from Iraqi missions with Russian colleagues. Fortunately, our armies are very close friends with the Russians. And most of the officers who study outside Kazakhstan study in Russian universities, since foreign experience is good, but we only have full cooperation with the CSTO allies, and primarily with Russia.
  5. cartridge
    +7
    13 June 2013 13: 43
    video of Kazakhstani TV about S-295
    2:31
    1. Akim
      +7
      13 June 2013 15: 21
      Quote: cartridge
      video of Kazakhstani TV about S-295

      8 cars is a lot. Of course, it’s more logical to buy a 400th Busi than Ana. The service will already be established.
  6. +3
    13 June 2013 13: 45
    Let our Minister Shoigu now go to Kazakhstan on a visit. We’ll also sell something ..
    1. Marek Rozny
      +9
      13 June 2013 23: 46
      and even so Kazakhstan buys a lot from Russia. would buy even more if Russia were able to meet our needs. For example, we began to purchase / produce German Eurocopter helicopters, because Russia is not able to make timely repairs of Mi-26 transport helicopters. We have more than 20 of these "cows" in need of overhaul / modernization, and Russia can only repair one turntable a year. As a result, they turned to the Germans.
      They asked the Russians to modernize our tanks, and even set up a joint venture for the production of armored vehicles - the Russians refused. Then ours created a joint venture with Turks and Ukrainians. They waited a long time for Izhevsk to create a wunder-waffle, but now it’s clear that we still have to wait a million years again. The Italians bought the first batch of Beretta ARX-160 assault rifles (so far only for special forces units). It will be seen further.
      We are now waiting for new Russian combat aircraft. Hopefully it doesn't end up "as always".
  7. Vtel
    +12
    13 June 2013 13: 49
    Kazakhs have the right to choose and the choice does not seem to be ours, although ours is no better.

    A.P. Sitnov - President, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Vladimir Klimov - Motor Sich Engines CJSC, Colonel General, Chief of Armaments of the Russian Armed Forces: For 1500-950 years, a wave of foreign-made aircraft went to Russia, and it actually stopped the production of Russian aircraft.What's in the air? All types of aircraft of the European consortium, plus Sweden, China, plus Bombardier and Embraer. Rostov, Krasnoyarsk, Samara and a number of other air hubs in Russia today are based on foreign-made radar stations.
    In many enterprises, general designers, who could create modern competitive aircraft, were replaced by managers, often far from aviation. In such a situation, which is happening today, young people do not go to aviation schools. As a result, the shortage of qualified pilots in Russia is growing every year. For example, foreign pilots fly in Kazakhstan, and now the government of our country is raising the issue of lifting the ban on the use of foreign specialists in Russian airlines. "
    1. +3
      13 June 2013 14: 49
      Quote: Vtel
      For example, foreign pilots fly in Kazakhstan, and now the government of our country is raising the issue of lifting the ban on the use of foreign specialists in Russian airlines. "

      Conclusion, pripets of our aviation, long live the Popular Front.
      1. Vtel
        +3
        13 June 2013 15: 38
        Find at least two differences in these photos. United Russia flowed smoothly to the Front. Only whom with whom it is not clear.
    2. Avenger711
      0
      13 June 2013 18: 13
      You just look at what is being done, it turns out 12-14 years ago it stopped, and not much earlier.
  8. +3
    13 June 2013 13: 53
    quote-As reported by EFE, the Minister of Defense of Kazakhstan Adilbek Dzhaksybekov also expressed interest in buying two A-400M aircraft.

    In my opinion, it would be better to buy military transport aircraft from Russia, or rather.

    1. +13
      13 June 2013 15: 27
      Well, Russia does not have similar aircraft, the A-400M is compared with the An-70, but it is not. And what can Kazakhstan wait for this AN-70 to be born if we live in common?
      1. Akim
        +3
        13 June 2013 15: 56
        Quote: Atrix
        . And what can Kazakhstan wait for this AN-70 to be born if we live in common?

        Engine Certification will end by August. Maybe the Russian respondents do not know, but in April bench tests of the engine were completed at the "Salyut", and the first two aircraft for Russia and Ukraine are already under bench tests themselves.
        http://vpk.name/news/88457_an70_poluchil_luchshii_v_mire_dvigatel.html
        http://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2013/06/05/256515.html
    2. Alexander D.
      +2
      13 June 2013 23: 27
      Quote: Apollon
      quote-As reported by EFE, the Minister of Defense of Kazakhstan Adilbek Dzhaksybekov also expressed interest in buying two A-400M aircraft.

      In my opinion, it would be better to buy military transport aircraft from Russia, or rather.

      The procurement of weapons from one manufacturer has never led to anything good - there is such a thing as diversification. This is the law of the market. Even in the USSR there were several design bureaus on armored vehicles and aviation, which created normal competition and pushed designers to search for new solutions and rationalization proposals. And look how much wonderful equipment they have created, and now any modernization project (not even creating a new project) has been tortured for years.
    3. +2
      13 June 2013 23: 55


      Quote: Apollon
      In my opinion, it would be better to buy military transport aircraft from Russia, or rather.
  9. +16
    13 June 2013 13: 58
    Well done Kazakhs good
    1. +6
      13 June 2013 23: 50
      Quote: Yeraz
      Well done Kazakhs
  10. +1
    13 June 2013 14: 11
    The further Ukraine goes to Geyrop, the more difficult it will be for it to promote its military equipment to the CSTO countries. And more specifically, in connection with this article, the AN-70, despite the fact that it is almost 2,9 times cheaper than the A400M and in many characteristics is better (according to Wikipedia http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki /% C0% ED-70).
  11. +7
    13 June 2013 14: 15
    Quote: kirieeleyson
    Kazakhs, of course, well done, the vector is set correctly. Here is the visual result - while we are discussing the supply of Anovs here and meeting the recycled Ilami, our neighbors and allies are buying foreign machinery.

    Guys, what are you minusing? Objectivity didn’t stop us from ever praising junk is patriotic in your opinion? Let’s decide on flies and honey on bees.
    1. +7
      13 June 2013 16: 22
      I ought to get into my nesting box for greater clarity - the mistrals themselves ordered, no one pulled us by the sleeve. And this deal was approved at the very top, even if we discuss the arguments here, a la "this is Taburetkin with his shobla", this is not us. This means that we still have a lot of things to be raised and rebuilt, from stocks and polymer compounds technology to the aviation industry, where design bureaus have not yet come up with anything new, not to mention production re-equipment. And so, minus what is there, I'm not greedy) Only here on urapatriotism we won't fly far.
  12. phantom359
    +3
    13 June 2013 14: 32
    Sorry. We are losing the MTC market. First C295, now interest in the plagiarized C400, which, moreover, is rather mediocre.
    1. -7
      13 June 2013 14: 51
      Quote: phantom359
      phantom359 (4) UA Today, 14:32 PM

      Sorry. We are losing the MTC market. First C295, now interest in the plagiarized C400, which, moreover, is rather mediocre.

      And where is the patriotism of our brothers Kazakhs.
      1. theodorh
        +10
        13 June 2013 16: 48
        I did not understand how Kazakh patriotism should be manifested here?
        1. avt
          0
          13 June 2013 17: 17
          Quote: valokordin
          And where is the patriotism of our brothers Kazakhs.

          Quote: teodorh
          I did not understand how Kazakh patriotism should be manifested here?

          Probably meant why not on horseback. laughing But seriously, the choice of the S-295 is quite understandable and at the moment it is completely justified. Well, Russia does not have cars of this class request and Ukraine, too, has an An-140 passenger and it will not be known whether it will be with a ramp, and Il -112 is not even in metal. But here is bus number 400 and even M request cunning gays got into a hike raw and stupid unit. I would even understand if I bought the S-130, well, their business, they can even get it for their money, buy a walking turntable as a combat helicopter and under-transport
          1. djon77
            +8
            13 June 2013 17: 45
            but can I ask you a question? Calling all gays to you is more comfortable living? As I understand it, from the point of view of psychology, it’s like you are bigger and more relaxed among similar people. Actually, for me it’s not necessary to remember about gays at all. As the church anathematizes these to oblivion. You look and the world will become cleaner
            1. avt
              -6
              13 June 2013 18: 22
              Quote: djon77
              can I ask a question?

              Can .
              Quote: djon77
              Now calling all the gays you live more comfortable?

              Why is everyone?
              Quote: djon77
              as if you are calmer in an environment like

              In an environment of his own kind, ANYONE is always more comfortable, well, if he does not pretend, then this mental illness - schizophrenia, is practically not treated.
              Quote: djon77
              for me it’s not necessary to remember about gays at all.

              Yes, I’d be glad not to remember, they don’t give it themselves, even in Europe they even pass laws and religious feelings of others, as they say in the common people, they put it with an appliance. Yes, and in Europe this is already becoming a religious cult, crowding out Christianity.
              Quote: djon77
              as the church anatimizes them, so do these oblivion. look and the world will become cleaner

              Is anathema oblivion? This is something new laughing in general, it was always an excommunication, a curse, and they do not anathema already in Christian denominations. Can you give an example of what new cases?
              1. djon77
                +5
                13 June 2013 21: 11
                You called all Europeans gay. Read your comment. But then you deny the most interesting thing. Well, if you take it wider, then the majority on this site is Europeans. That is, representatives of the Caucasian race
          2. +4
            13 June 2013 21: 05
            Discussed the purchase of Kazakhstan aircraft from Airbus.
            It would seem, what do gays have to do with it wink wink wink
          3. Marek Rozny
            +9
            14 June 2013 00: 11
            well, so far Kazakhstan has simply "expressed interest" about the A-400M. And the S-295 is already being purchased. We often "express interest" - but this does not always mean buying. We were also "interested" in the C-130, the Americans even drove them to the KZ in order to finally persuade them to buy. Our people praised the equipment, but in the end they bought Spanish transporters. Let it be more expensive, but new.
            As for the turntables, the German EU-145 is a good helicopter for many small tasks (patrolling, transportation of small detachments, etc.). By the way, he has already entered the Ministry of Emergencies (besides the fact that he enters the Ministry of Defense), and the German Ministry of Emergency Situations plan to purchase them only a few years later (officially announced by the German Ministry of Emergencies).
            But the second model of the Eurocopter, which was purchased by Kazakhstan (and will be assembled in the KZ) - the EU-725 - is quite a normal military transport. At the very least, it is better to have 20 flying EU-725s and 45 flying EU-145s than having 20 flightless Mi-26s that the Russians cannot repair in a timely manner.
            And, by the way, the EU-145 "promenade and non-transport vehicle" in the amount of ~ 350 pieces was purchased several years ago by the US army. Apparently, the German helicopters are not so stupid.
      2. Alexander D.
        +7
        13 June 2013 23: 55
        Quote: valokordin
        And where is the patriotism of our brothers Kazakhs.

        This is called: nothing personal - only the interests of national security.
  13. -13
    13 June 2013 14: 50
    Everything should be done in a natural way. Well, they will get stuffed with electronics. Airbuses will fly a little, face high maintenance costs, the need to buy native supplies, plus the effects of dusty steppe storms, plus extreme temperature extremes, the impact on the precision design of unpretentious technicians, you look and look again at let not sophisticated, but easy to operate and repair quite reliable Russian equipment.
    1. +18
      13 June 2013 15: 43
      Which Russian? Do not tell
      And perhaps the AN-140 without a ramp and with poor analog devices? Or the IL-112 which is still in the layout, and probably will remain in it?
      Ukrainian An-32b, so from 295 it's like earth and sky

      And our pilots continue to fly on the physically obsolete An-24 and 26, endangering the lives of themselves and other military personnel, it would be better if we had learned from Kazakhstan, made a decision and purchased good equipment, rather than flying on airplanes that should be scrapped already
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +12
        13 June 2013 17: 04
        Quote: Rustam
        Which Russian? Do not tell


        Rustam, hello buddy! You, of course, everywhere + for posts, there’s even nothing to comment on, everything is clear and, as always, correctly! drinks !

        And I’ll answer your question .. as one Which is the One and Only - Super-Superfood-100 wassat more to offer .. nothing crying
      2. 0
        13 June 2013 17: 38
        Well, you can Tu-330VT for example ...
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +12
          13 June 2013 17: 54
          Quote: B_KypTke
          Well, you can Tu-330VT for example


          I agree, in this we are masters .. suggest something. which is not a priori! wassat that's why from us and .. "dump" quietly .. that Kazakhs, that Indians ...

          The only thing we are "holding" for so far is the price (dumping), and the opportunity to get a "bad credit" !!!

          Unfortunately..... sad
        2. +4
          13 June 2013 21: 17
          The Kazakhs chose planes, rather than projections of varying degrees of readiness, otherwise they would have had a choice: the updated An-124, Il-112, Il-214, Tu-330, An-70
          1. Marek Rozny
            +8
            14 June 2013 00: 25
            You have not yet mentioned the world's best transport aircraft MR-2013. It has the highest performance characteristics, at the same time low price and simply beautiful design. But for some reason, the Ministry of Defense of Kazakhstan chose a Spanish plane. It's upsetting to me. I have been drawing this MR-2013 in MS Paint for so many days ((((Not rated, you bastards ... But I can still offer the MR-2030 transporter! It can fly even in airless space!
  14. Algor73
    +6
    13 June 2013 15: 36
    A-400 is a good aircraft, the main thing is that it flies in the series. But that is not the point. Kazakhstan in the Collective Security Treaty Organization has always been focused on Russian weapons. Now slowly moving away. First with weapons, then with what? A little more and Russia will buy the A-400 - there is no similar aircraft, but for some reason (?) Cooperation does not work with Ukraine.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      -1
      13 June 2013 15: 46
      Because you are always trying to heat the customer. You can only steal. Well, now you can at least get me the cons. Antonov is dead and you can now at least rub it off.
      But the Kazakhs of Maloriki there look and our normal transport plane will take, before approaching its counterpart.
    2. +6
      13 June 2013 16: 31
      Regarding AN-70, Kazakhs can be partially understood. Even in the medium term, it is difficult to focus on the producer in whose country de-industrialization is taking place (one of the tools to turn Ukraine into a colony).
  15. Yarbay
    +14
    13 June 2013 15: 46
    What can I say?
    Probably only to congratulate the brotherly country!
    I sincerely wish you success!
  16. +2
    13 June 2013 16: 38
    What can I say .... New technology is certainly good, of course, it’s bad that it’s again foreign. But we must hope that this is temporary and from the lack of our own samples. It is not good if the CSTO is armed with a stranger.
  17. SPIRITofFREEDOM
    +3
    13 June 2013 16: 57
    I hope this decision will push the Russian authorities to accelerate the creation of their own transport vehicle in line with modern realities!
    1. -3
      13 June 2013 17: 05
      We need a second reunion of Ukraine and everything will fall into place.
      1. 0
        13 June 2013 22: 02
        someone does not understand what is the meaning of the word "reunion"? See http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C2%EE%F1%F1%EE%E5%E4%E8%ED%E5%ED%E8%E5_%D3%EA%F0%E
        0%E8%ED%FB_%F1_%D0%EE%F1%F1%E8%E5%E9
  18. Alikovo
    -1
    13 June 2013 17: 06
    why they don’t buy from us.
    1. +3
      13 June 2013 17: 17
      Read "Il-476 - is the choice justified?" http://alex-palagin.livejournal.com/16021.html
  19. +1
    13 June 2013 17: 30
    Now, Kazakhstan began to purchase Western aircraft.
    Is it really impossible to entrust the development of the An-70 to another team, since they are already engaged in frank sabotage - let the hang gliders construct, why are they hooked on to them, what is the problem?
    1. Akim
      +5
      13 June 2013 17: 50
      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
      Is it really impossible to entrust the development of the An-70 to another team,

      This is a radical and independent measure on the verge of idiocy. Can I remind you that this is a Kharkov development, and the engines are Zaporozhye .. Who will finish if the only flying instance is in Ukraine. And they won’t give him away - they will be occupied by hang gliders and will be allowed to mount them. The maximum that you can count on: to transfer part of the documentation and for a new term for your own developments. Let them try to make MTA (MTS) with Indian money first.
      1. 0
        13 June 2013 19: 23
        Transfer production to the Voronezh plant, but the question is with engines ...
        If the engines are useless (which is most likely the reason for the unavailability of the An-70), you will have to create new ones.
        1. Akim
          +1
          13 June 2013 19: 54
          Quote: Ivan Tarasov
          Transfer production to the Voronezh plant, but the question is with engines ...

          What a fright? Who will give you the glider and wing? What do you think An-140T decided to release themselves? This is a whole negotiation process. Yes, it is produced only in Russia, because in this transport version no one else needs it.
          Despite the fact that the An-74TK-300 An-140, and the An-148 family were developed independently by design bureaus, but with Russian components
          1. Akim
            +1
            13 June 2013 20: 11
            I consider the An-140T worse than the modernized An-32, which was delivered to Iraq.
  20. pinecone
    +6
    13 June 2013 17: 55
    Quote: seasoned
    I’m glad for Kazakhstan, but it seems to me buying different equipment from different countries will its service, operation and training and education of specialists then pour into a haemorrhage? This applies not only to the Air Force, there are a lot of things bought there in the artillery and infantry.


    The Turks ordered 10 of these machines. Surely they will master together.
  21. gladiatorakz
    +2
    13 June 2013 18: 05
    AN-70 is much better than 400. Rather, they understand that for at least 5 years the plant will be loaded to the eyeballs, so they’ll take it faster.
    1. fedorovith
      +3
      13 June 2013 18: 25
      Better, not better, why do they need chamomile? 70 where? And this one has already gone, well done Kazakhs.
  22. +13
    13 June 2013 19: 05
    Apollo: it is better to buy military transport aircraft from Russia
    valokordin And where is the patriotism of our brothers Kazakhs.
    Duc, Kazakhstan, and wanted to buy, they are not corny request Actually, Kazakhstan waited as long as possible, but then the events took place in Zhanaozen .. "And then the soldiers were transferred to the old Tu-134 and Tu-154 ministries of emergency situations with almost fully developed motor resources...Because the very concept of waiting for a new aircraft was oriented, on the one hand, to the joint Russian-Ukrainian military transport An-140, and on the other hand, to the new Il-476, the production of which was unfolding in Russia. IL-476 was to replace the IL-76, which was produced in Tashkent. However, after Uzbekistan disrupted the contract for the supply of several dozen aircraft to China under Russian agreements on the sale of military equipment, Moscow decided to transfer production to its territory. Actually, our Ministry of Defense was expecting the appearance on the market of proposals for An-140 and IL-476. But here it was not very simple. Firstly, the An-140 turned out to be a very crude aircraft. More recently, this December, Russia announced that it was stopping the purchase of new An-140 aircraft because its operation, and Moscow bought 18 aircraft, revealed many shortcomings. As for the Il-Xnumx, their delivery to the Russian troops is just beginning, the first contracts have been signed, and it is not clear what the final result will be. But in any case, Russia will first have to satisfy its needs for new aircraft, and then already supply them for export.
    As a result, in December 2011 (during the events in Zhanaozen), we did not have enough military transport aircraft. In 2012, Kazakhstan announced the acquisition of the C-295 military transport aircraft from Airbus. This aircraft, by characteristics, is an exact analogue of the An-72 - the same 10 tons of carrying capacity and 69 paratroopers. Therefore, Kazakhstan was left without new military transport aircraft .. negative Therefore, we all also fly on old Soviet aircraft, which, with all due respect to them and to the repairs carried out on them, are still obsolete both morally and financially. The army buys many types of weapons from us, but it may be better to spend money on updating the military transport aviation, which is really critical for the country's security. At the same time, the country can afford to spend 240 million dollars, for example, on 6 C-295 aircraft, catalog price 40 million. dollars. While one is Russian IL-476 worth more today 100 million dollars. In the meantime, we are still flying old cars of the Soviet era and hope for a chance ..
    http://www.asiakz.com/voenno-transportnoe-pike
  23. +12
    13 June 2013 19: 23
    Well, the assessment in the comments is mostly positive, people understand that today in the CIS there is no equal offer for BTA, and to wait when there is no time to get born there is an old BTA fleet of Kazakhstan, I need an update. For myself, I give a rating plus because I bought BTA planes, and not another member of the board as recently bought AN in vip performance.
    1. Alexander D.
      +1
      14 June 2013 00: 05
      Quote: Semurg
      Well, the assessment in the comments is mostly positive, people understand that today in the CIS there is no equal offer for BTA, and to wait when there is no time to get born there is an old BTA fleet of Kazakhstan, I need an update. For myself, I give a rating plus because I bought BTA planes, and not another member of the board as recently bought AN in vip performance.

      And what kind of AN model have you recently bought and what exactly didn’t like? If possible, only specifics.
      1. +2
        14 June 2013 07: 20
        Quote: Alexander D.
        Quote: Semurg
        Well, the assessment in the comments is mostly positive, people understand that today in the CIS there is no equal offer for BTA, and to wait when there is no time to get born there is an old BTA fleet of Kazakhstan, I need an update. For myself, I give a rating plus because I bought BTA planes, and not another member of the board as recently bought AN in vip performance.

        And what kind of AN model have you recently bought and what exactly didn’t like? If possible, only specifics.

        The AN-74 did not like the VIP lounge (leather sofas and plasma panels) is clearly not for transporting special forces of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. In more detail below the headline in the news, the heading of type-U of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan appeared its own air jeep.
        1. Alexander D.
          0
          15 June 2013 00: 21
          As far as the photographs show, there is not only a VIP salon, but also for mere mortals. Well, a VIP salon you yourself understand for whom - for people who will fly it 20 times more often than special forces.
  24. +9
    13 June 2013 19: 57
    We survived, look! We can’t offer a normal transporter to Kazakhs! sad
  25. waisson
    -8
    13 June 2013 20: 13
    here’s the customs union, war is war, and we’ll have crackers Kazakhs like biscuits. We wouldn’t develop our industry by developing and building new models together as a counterweight to NATO, we didn’t decide to buy used basins from them
    The first copy of the A400M was demonstrated on June 26, 2008 in Seville.
    The first flight of the prototype aircraft took place in 1997. Serial production of the Casa C-295 started in 2000. There are a number of modifications.
    1. Marek Rozny
      +7
      14 June 2013 01: 17
      Quote: waisson
      war is war and crackers are apart Kazakhs like biscuits

      Kazakhs generally lovers devour diverse. In addition to the usual food, the Kazakh soldier eats sausage, cheese, fruits, 200 g of juice and 4 eggs per week every day.
      Head of the Logistics Directorate of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan Talgat Dauletov: "The energy value of the daily combined-arms ration in the Republic of Kazakhstan is 4300 kcal - more than in the American army (4255 kcal), the Bundeswehr army (3950 kcal) and only slightly inferior to the Russian army (4374 kcal). Unlike our ration, the Russian ration lacks such products as fresh fruits, vegetable juices, sour cream, cottage cheese, which are so necessary for a young body. Currently, the norm of food rations and rations is being developed, where the calorie content will be 4850 kcal, which is higher than the Russian ration for 476 kcal, and the following food products have been added: chicken meat, kefir, bee honey, garlic, sweet pepper, herbs. " (October 2012)
      Keep up with the army and the VV-Schnick. For example, those who are surrounded during city events, in addition to the obligatory three meals a day, get hot tea packed in food containers, a sandwich with sausage and cheese, chocolate, hematogen, garlic and ascorbic acid.
      And at the holidays, sweets, rolls, baursaki and also beshbarmak. So sorry, but the Kazakhs really like to eat a lot and tasty.
      Quote: waisson
      there is no need to develop their industry by developing and building new models together as a counterweight to NATO; no, they decided to buy used basins from them

      1) The Kazakhs develop their military-industrial complex, however, the rest of the industry of the civilian sector of the economy. But now we cannot produce large planes of our own design. And they are needed today. We have no experience in this, no technology, no specialists, no desire to do this. Although in the field of small aircraft one can already boast of the appearance of two factories producing small airplanes. Plus another aircraft plant will open this year (together with the American Cessna).
      2) Aircraft purchased in Spain are not used. These are absolutely freshly built aircraft that arrive in Kazakhstan directly from the factory.
      3) Does Russia not buy anything from NATO countries? Or it seemed to me that the Russians allegedly bought Mistral from the French, Iveco from the Italians, sniper rifles from someone else, etc. If it seemed to me, then I’ll go sing out of emotion for the fact that Kazakhstan turned out to be a scoundrel buying goods from NATO, while the Russian army selflessly buys helicopter carriers and armored vehicles from Kazakhstan.
    2. +3
      14 June 2013 09: 37
      Quote: waisson
      here you have the customs union war war

      You forget to consider the logic of recent purchases with events in Afghanistan. As you know, the Americans are leaving there .. And, Kazakhstan, considering all possible risks, is very seriously preparing for this. However, without exaggerating the possibility of this threat. If you look at the procurement of weapons in K-n over the past few years, you will notice some characteristic trends: 1) The financing of the army has sharply increased; 2) Lately there are massive purchases of weapons; 3) The vector of purchases has changed - their nomenclature says that the Taliban and other semi-partisan formations are considered a potential adversary; 4) In K-several aircraft that underwent repairs in the Russian Federation crashed several times ??! negative The question is what conclusions came to K-not ?!
      5) Now the emphasis is on the development of airmobile troops - at present there are five brigades. The question is, what kind of rapid reaction forces are these - without air transport ?! (those notorious A-400M and C-295) .. 6) The leadership of the Republic of Kazakhstan insists that at least part of the technology is transferred and, as far as possible, localization of production in Kazakhstan and "local content" in manufactured products ..
      PS Instead of arranging "osrach" fool Would have built, for a long time, some thread transport ..
      1. +5
        14 June 2013 10: 23
        Clarification .. instead of "osrach" - xoxlosrach, bully this word is prohibited))
        PS Instead of arranging a "xoxlosrach" They would have built, for a long time, some kind of transport worker..
  26. waisson
    +1
    13 June 2013 20: 21
    Here is an example of independent states.
    Azerbaijan acquired Russian T-90S tanks and Msta-S self-propelled guns instead of Turkish equipment
    1. +2
      13 June 2013 21: 24
      Strange logic ... if he buys Turkish - dependent, Russian - independent. Moreover, that Kazakhstan, that Azerbaijan were precisely part of the RI-USSR, and not Turkey ...
      1. Alexander D.
        +3
        14 June 2013 00: 07
        Quote: cdrt
        Strange logic ... if he buys Turkish - dependent, Russian - independent. Moreover, that Kazakhstan, that Azerbaijan were precisely part of the RI-USSR, and not Turkey ...

        Azerbaijan does everything wisely - an affectionate calf of two queens sucks.
        If there is money and opportunities, why put all the eggs in one basket?
    2. Yarbay
      +2
      13 June 2013 21: 33
      Quote: waisson
      Here is an example of independent states.
      Azerbaijan acquired Russian T-90S tanks and Msta-S self-propelled guns instead of Turkish equipment

      Azerbaijan and bought Turkish !!!
      The contract for Fyrtyn was written that it will begin to be executed from the middle of this month, that is, deliveries will begin!
  27. +6
    13 June 2013 21: 37
    Less snot had to be chewed with the AN-70 ... Kazakhs are not required to wait for us and the Ukrainians to get tired of measuring their pussy.
  28. escobar
    0
    14 June 2013 00: 40
    Quote: alexneg
    And how do you like this?

    He looked here and looked with interest at Max. Other fighter jets are not bad either, but one gets the impression: they’ll slow down a bit and will fly down, and the T-50 seems to be floating in its element on invisible waves. This is of course a breakthrough!
  29. Maj.
    +1
    14 June 2013 06: 19
    Promising military-technical cooperation S-17A (USA), An-70 (Ukraine, Russia) and its export version - An-7X significantly surpass the A-400M in a number of tactical and technical indicators, in particular in terms of the “payload / flight range” criterion, and fully meet European standards, the development of the An-70 MTC is ahead of the A-400M project by at least ten years.
    1. Marek Rozny
      +3
      14 June 2013 12: 46
      And I say that the promising MTC MR-2013 is significantly superior to the An-70 in a number of tactical and technical indicators and meets all standards. And the development of the MR-2030 is ahead of all promising aircraft by 150 years, because can easily fly in space.
      I'm waiting for the Russians to pay me money for my developments. They are almost ready for me. I drew not by hand, but in the "MC Paint" program. I hope Russia will prefer to buy my drawings or, at least, is ready to wait decades for me to translate my idea into a real plane. After all, Russia should only buy in the CSTO countries. laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"