Military Review

China launches 056 project corvettes

45
China launches 056 project corvettesAccording to Chinese network resources, at the beginning of June 2013, two corvettes of the new 056 project (NATO designation - Jaingdao class) - the fifth and sixth ships of this type, respectively, were introduced into the PLA Navy. This refers to Qinzhou corvettes (tail number "597") and Shangrao (tail number "583"). The Qinzhou Corvette was built by the Guangzhou Huangpu Shipbuiding Company in Guangzhou (becoming the second corvette of this shipyard), and the Shangrao Corvette was built by the Shanghai Shipyard Hudong Shipyard of the Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding Group (and also became the second corvette handed over to the factory - the first corvette Bengbu series).


Thus, since the introduction of Chinese fleet the first corvette of Project 056 Bengbu (tail number "582") on February 25, 2013, the PLA Navy received six (!) ships of this type in three and a half months - in addition to the three mentioned ships, Huizhou corvettes (tail number were also delivered in April-May) “596”, built at Hudong Shipyard), Datong (tail number “580”, built by Dalian Liaonan Shipyard in Dalian) and corvette with tail number “584” (possible name Suqian, built by Wuchang Shipbuilding Industry Company in Wuhan). According to the available information, at the listed four shipbuilding enterprises of the PRC at least 12 more project 056 corvettes are in various stages of construction, including four under construction afloat: Gian corvette (tail number "586") - at Hudong Shipyard, corvette with tail 587 for Guangzhou Huangpu Shipbuiding Company, a 585 corvette for the Wuchang Shipbuilding Industry Company and a 581 for Corvette for Dalian Liaonan Shipyard.



According to the Chinese classification, the 056 project refers specifically to frigates, although a number of Russian-speaking sources attribute them to corvettes. The ship's displacement is 1300 (according to other data, up to 1500) tons, and the armament is represented by two rocket launchers (anti-ship missiles YJ-83, they are also C-803, range to 300 kilometers, speed to two speeds of sound), AK-176 gunner ( caliber 76 millimeters), two 30-mm guns and two three-tube torpedo tubes with a caliber 533 millimeter. The air group consists of one helicopter, for which the takeoff deck is equipped.

The surface part of the ship is made with elements of technology to reduce radio sight. Two diesel engines (the power of which is not indicated) allow to reach speeds up to 28 knots, and in economy mode (18 knots) the range is about 3700 kilometers.

http://bmpd.livejournal.com
http://lenta.ru/news/2013/06/12/chinacorvett
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Orel
    Orel 13 June 2013 07: 38 New
    +2
    China seeks to challenge the naval power of the United States and Japan in the Pacific.
    1. MilaPhone
      MilaPhone 13 June 2013 07: 48 New
      +2
      I wonder what their level of quality is at this pace of construction.
      1. saved
        saved 13 June 2013 08: 16 New
        11
        I think that just the quality is normal, because they have a large term of imprisonment for a major marriage. Moreover, the domestic market of China is not at all what they trade with us. And global brands do not complain about quality at all, otherwise they would have long been removed from there.
    2. Algor73
      Algor73 13 June 2013 09: 42 New
      +2
      He already left, didn’t they notice? But not only the USA and Japan.
  2. Trailer
    Trailer 13 June 2013 07: 43 New
    0
    For three and a half months, the PLA Navy has already received six (!) Ships of this type

    Yak pies! Well, I hope not in quantity, so in terms of the displacement of the ships put into operation in 2013, we will not yield to the Chinese.
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 13 June 2013 13: 26 New
      +2
      very naive ... ((
  3. Akim
    Akim 13 June 2013 07: 47 New
    +3
    According to the Chinese classification, project 056 relates specifically to frigates, although a number of Russian-speaking sources classify them as corvettes

    According to the Chinese classification, he refers to corvettes: 英文
    Moreover, the Chinese forum member J20! He speaks. that this is the 9th ship of this class.
    1. kirieeleyson
      kirieeleyson 13 June 2013 10: 37 New
      0
      Quote: Akim
      this is the 9th ship of this class.

      Compared with our "guardian" and in general was happy for the PLA. At this pace, in the APR there will soon be a fine barrier from the ships of the Navy PLA. And a great help for the squadron of the Mediterranean Sea.
  4. Edward72
    Edward72 13 June 2013 07: 47 New
    +3
    Well, maybe it’s enough for China to sell weapons now let them do it. It's time to think about yourself.
    1. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak 13 June 2013 10: 30 New
      0
      Quote: Edward72
      .It's time to think about yourself

      I hope you know that money is needed for everything. An unfamiliar seller will not give you a box of matches without money. Do you agree? Do you know how many people do not pay taxes in full? Do you know how many entrepreneurs by any means evade taxes? Indeed, those requiring freedom for Khodork are similar to him. Now, think about the meaning of your own words! smile Do not pay taxes, undermine the country's defense. And then there are also stealing the budget around spinning. It is a pity that it does not work out an example from the Chinese or Iranians to take.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Konsmo
        Konsmo 13 June 2013 10: 58 New
        0
        Do you pay?
        And in the courses that with each ruble, more than 50 kopecks goes to the state and social workers.
        And the hospitals draw pressure for each alik, they draw a heart attack and disability, and the sanatorium is 21 days free. And we transfer the asphalt every 2 years.
        I do business, electronics, not trade.
        While this ruble earn all .. in soap.
        A friend has a metalworking company. 4 eagles plow him. He pays himself more. Last week he called, he says .. and the full one. He sold the lathe. He refuses slowly from the premises.
        And do not agitate us for the Motherland. Officials are not the Motherland. am
        1. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 13 June 2013 11: 07 New
          0
          Quote: Konsmo
          Do you pay?

          15 years paid. He sat on the impute for almost half the term. And now I get paid.
  5. vitek1233
    vitek1233 13 June 2013 07: 56 New
    0
    Interestingly, our Pacific Fleet can be compared with the Chinese?
    1. Edward72
      Edward72 13 June 2013 08: 03 New
      +3
      Considering how the Chinese build ships, soon there will be nothing to compare. After all, on the Pacific Fleet ships of the 70-80s and even then do not fall apart thanks to the seagulls.
      1. cartridge
        cartridge 13 June 2013 08: 08 New
        +2
        Do not die in advance, my dear! Remember Mark Twain’s phrase: “Rumors of my death are greatly exaggerated?”
        So do not rush to bury the Pacific Fleet. You still will not succeed.
        1. Edward72
          Edward72 13 June 2013 08: 14 New
          +1
          So I repeat once more, enough to drive weapons beyond the cordon you need to think and do about your own aircraft, let the pilgrims invent themselves.
      2. leon-iv
        leon-iv 13 June 2013 13: 20 New
        -2
        After all, on the Pacific Fleet, ships of the 70-80s and even then do not fall apart thanks to seagulls.

        Og only 949 all these dishes cheerfully drown without any problems.
    2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 13 June 2013 08: 06 New
      +2
      Can. But it’s better not to do this - your nerves will be more whole
    3. bddrus
      bddrus 13 June 2013 11: 39 New
      0
      I can’t say by technical characteristics, but for objectivity it is worth considering both financial and human potential. And many people demand that the fleet be consistent with the strength of the United States, but they forget that they have more than 2 times the people and the military budget is 10 times more. With China, the story is about the same - you want to compare the fleet of a whole large country with a GDP greater than ours (I think the military budget is also larger) with one of our fleets.
    4. Kavtorang
      Kavtorang 13 June 2013 12: 32 New
      +1
      Better not try.
      Go into sadness and go get drunk vodka. Sobsna, even for combat-ready "strategists" is no longer worth it - at best bash on bash. Anything smaller is still sadder.
      1. leon-iv
        leon-iv 13 June 2013 13: 24 New
        0
        If according to strategists we have START-3 this time. Further, they have exactly the same problems with the BR for them, ours do not.
        Well, China is riveting boats; let it continue to make the Russian Navy not a threat, and we will not be a continental power.
    5. Odysseus
      Odysseus 13 June 2013 15: 36 New
      +1
      Quote: vitek1233
      Interestingly, our Pacific Fleet can be compared with the Chinese?

      Well, you're a joker. We are more and more engaged in the Caspian flotilla ....
  6. Tarpon
    Tarpon 13 June 2013 08: 11 New
    +1
    in three and a half months already received six (!) ships of this type

    I wish we had such a pace of launching new ships.
    1. Akim
      Akim 13 June 2013 08: 14 New
      0
      Quote: Tarpon
      I wish we had such a pace of launching new ships

      And how many ships handed over / handed over in Russia for 2012-13?
      1. Odysseus
        Odysseus 13 June 2013 15: 26 New
        +1
        Quote: Akim
        And how many ships handed over / handed over in Russia for 2012-13?

        For 1,5 years, 1 submarine (without missiles), 2 corvettes.
  7. Alexey Prikazchikov
    Alexey Prikazchikov 13 June 2013 08: 12 New
    -5
    A boat, not a corvette. Although maybe corvettes should be so simple and cheap. And not like a small boat here, Arly Burke can set the heat.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 13 June 2013 09: 22 New
      +6
      Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
      And not like a small boat here, Arly Burke can set the heat.

      What is it?
      1. leon-iv
        leon-iv 13 June 2013 13: 25 New
        +1
        Buyan-M with 8 calibers.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 13 June 2013 17: 12 New
          +1
          Quote: leon-iv
          Buyan-M with 8 calibers.

          Buyan vs. Arly Burke? Theoretically, Buyan, of course, could "set the heat" on an aircraft carrier if he let it close. But really Arly with a helicopter (or helicopters), his number of missiles and radar Buyan will not give a chance, unfortunately, the weight categories are different.
    2. sapsan14
      sapsan14 13 June 2013 09: 44 New
      +3
      It's time to stop comparing. The US is building a fleet for its purposes, and the Burke is the foundation, and not the worst. The Chinese are quantitatively increasing their fleet, improving quality with each series. And this is also a clearly traceable program. Every year we lose in quality (long service life without deep modernization), we do not grow, at least quantitatively. There is no program for the development of the fleet (We don’t talk about "projects" until 202 ... of the year). And "set the heat" may come tomorrow. THAN?
      1. afire
        afire 13 June 2013 15: 03 New
        0
        we'll come up with something request as always what
  8. LOCKS
    LOCKS 13 June 2013 08: 27 New
    +1
    This is the pace. While amers are learning to print pads on their three-dimensional printers, the Chinese are already making ships.
  9. tun1313
    tun1313 13 June 2013 09: 02 New
    0
    Of course, I understand that this makes no sense, but ... somehow ugly. The pace is scary.
  10. Vtel
    Vtel 13 June 2013 10: 19 New
    +1
    For three and a half months, the PLA Navy has already received six (!) Ships of this type

    They put it right on the stream. Every Chinese in the ship and the United States does not have enough bananas to throw them.
    1. bddrus
      bddrus 13 June 2013 11: 41 New
      0
      only I did not understand when they were laid? how much time do they build?
      1. Odysseus
        Odysseus 13 June 2013 15: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: bddrus
        only I did not understand when they were laid? how much time do they build?

        Between launching and transferring to the fleet a little less than a year.
  11. Ezhaak
    Ezhaak 13 June 2013 10: 40 New
    0
    The question is to those who today are directly related to the fleet.
    How effective are ships built using stealth technologies? How strong is the effect of using these technologies?
  12. fisherman
    fisherman 13 June 2013 10: 42 New
    0
    the big question is the quality of these corvettes at such a pace - aren't our Five Year Five Years methods used? By the way - is there any open accident data from their navy? recourse
  13. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 13 June 2013 10: 42 New
    +3
    The Chinese felt for the right type of corvette to protect the water area. Simple, cheap and cheerful. In terms of its performance characteristics and the functions performed, it is close to our IPC of project 1124M. But with the suppression of the function of striking enemy ships. The Chinese understand that they urgently need to change their old coastal numerous, multi-type and inefficient fleet. We stopped at project 056 and riveted them on several CVDs. What can I say - well done.
  14. Konsmo
    Konsmo 13 June 2013 11: 00 New
    -1
    Judging by the fact that there is no air defense, these are coastal ships or landing
  15. bddrus
    bddrus 13 June 2013 11: 45 New
    0
    maybe it would have been more fun for us since 20380/20385, if several shipyards were built, but the second one was connected - the Amur Shipyard, and they all spent time ... about it. So it would be two shipyards - about 6 in the tab - you would look and issued a couple of three a year.
  16. silver_roman
    silver_roman 13 June 2013 11: 46 New
    0
    yeah ... the pace is really enviable, straight shock I would say. But only against the backdrop of frigates, these boats are at least 2 times smaller. that and not a word about the air defense of the ship.
    yet the guys are still trying to take more in quantity. than quality. Although sometimes such tactics are also very effective.
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 13 June 2013 15: 34 New
      +1
      Quote: silver_roman
      yeah ... the pace is really enviable, straight shock I would say. But only against the backdrop of frigates, these boats are at least 2 times smaller. that and about the air defense of the ship not a word

      Frigates are also being built. Air defense at 056 is.
      1. leon-iv
        leon-iv 13 June 2013 17: 12 New
        -1
        FL-3000N?
        Is it a misunderstanding to call air defense? And judging by the dimensions there is an analogue of our Needle but a range of 9 km is indicated which is most likely throwable.
        And so the boat is nothing but for the OVR is quite good.
        1. Odysseus
          Odysseus 14 June 2013 01: 54 New
          +1
          Quote: leon-iv
          FL-3000N?
          Is it a misunderstanding to call air defense?

          Well, what to put on a ship with a displacement of 1350 tons? HQ-9?
          A completely normal system for a guard.
          Quote: leon-iv
          And so the boat is nothing but for OVR is quite good

          I don’t understand your skepticism. It’s a watchman. And in its quality it’s not bad either. The modular design, elements of reducing the radio frequency, a complete set of weapons. Of course, we don’t know the start, but given the successes of the People’s Republic of China in electronics, there is hardly anything terrible there.
          We ourselves would not be in trouble with 8-10 such boats. Especially in indoor pools (Black Sea Fleet, BF)
  17. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 13 June 2013 11: 54 New
    +3
    Quote: Konsmo
    Judging by the fact that there is no air defense, these are coastal ships or landing

    Have you joked, Dear, about air defense?
    Follow the link - an excellent photo gallery, stages of construction and performance characteristics.
    http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/056.html
  18. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 13 June 2013 12: 44 New
    +1
    Quote: tun1313
    Of course, I understand that this makes no sense, but ... somehow ugly

    But who did you see a beautiful ship with low radar visibility? Or calculated angles or smooth lines. As beautiful as our 1164, 956, 1155 - of modern "stealth" I do not remember exactly.
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 13 June 2013 13: 34 New
      0
      Stealth also looks very much. Take a look at our 22350, or Amersky Zumwalt.
  19. leon-iv
    leon-iv 13 June 2013 13: 28 New
    +1
    Why are you so excited then?
    The ship in fact is a small OVR corvette. Here is the most interesting thing that they have inside. For the riveting case is one thing. It can be compared with Buyan only here we saw them for the Caspian, reducing seaworthiness and increasing shock functions.
  20. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 13 June 2013 13: 48 New
    +2
    Quote: leon-iv
    It can be compared with Buyan only here we saw them for the Caspian, reducing seaworthiness and increasing shock functions.

    I agree 100%. You can go with SIGMA or "Govind", "Eilat", K-130, but to carry them now.
    But I got excited ... Well, for example, I personally am now a pensioner, I go there every day, and in the evening I go past the RPD of 165 BRNK and 19 SLBM of the Primorsky Flotilla of various forces of the Pacific Fleet. Every time I feel sad. Not a damn thing is changing there for the better - there are fewer and fewer ships, more deserted and deserted.
    1. leon-iv
      leon-iv 13 June 2013 14: 11 New
      +1
      Then I wrote about my vision of the fleet.
      Briefly, the fleet that was in the USSR we don’t need because its main purpose is to cover strategists. Now strategists are much quieter starting with the BRD and the BRDM. And NKs will only give out their presence. But there were no multipurpose ships in the fleet of the USSR. They went only with 20380 and 22350 now they are already going and buoys, by the way, their pace is not bad for 2 years.
      The same weight at 11356M
      at 22350 let's see how it goes with kasatonovym
      20385 is already more or less.
  21. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 13 June 2013 14: 01 New
    +1
    Quote: patsantre
    Stealth also look very.

    But what about aesthetics? One of the greats, I can’t remember exactly, said: perfect military equipment cannot be ugly (I can’t vouch for verbatim, but the meaning is that). The taste and color ...
    IMHO, "Zumvolt" is a monster of a terrible kind. Look on the page of this day about the North African fleets - there are a couple of photos of ships with low radar visibility. Then find photos or drawings of the latest series of Japanese WWII heavy cruisers.
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 13 June 2013 18: 08 New
      0
      And in my opinion - Zumwalt is handsome. For taste and color.
  22. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 13 June 2013 14: 15 New
    +1
    Quote: leon-iv
    Og only 949 all these dishes cheerfully drown without any problems

    It is to beat fleas with marine diesel. 949 / 949A - these are boats of special destiny and direct destination. Literally: 10th ANTI-AIRCRAFT DIVISION. "Granite" in the mosquito fleet - cool, RESPECT !!! hi
    1. leon-iv
      leon-iv 13 June 2013 14: 21 New
      +1
      "Granite" in the mosquito fleet - cool, RESPECT !!!
      \
      Yes, I'm not talking about him at all, but about the adult PLA fleet. Enough of such mosquitoes Uranus.
  23. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 13 June 2013 18: 27 New
    0
    Quote: leon-iv
    FL-3000N?
    Is it a misunderstanding to call air defense? And judging by the dimensions there is an analogue of our Needle but a range of 9 km is indicated which is most likely throwable.

    More precisely - "Osa-M" with drum feed and 2nd combat ready. A. What can I dislike about the RAM complex, can I clarify? A bunch of countries enjoy and do not complain. In the volume of publications of the ZVO, the last 20 years, there were definitely no negative opinions.
    1. leon-iv
      leon-iv 13 June 2013 19: 10 New
      0
      the need for such ships as part of the air defense echelon is not bad. The question is how this corvette will interact with the provider. I say the point of saying without knowing what kind of piece of iron there is.