Military Review

Airborne troops acquired a peacekeeping brigade

27
Airborne troops acquired a peacekeeping brigadeIn the airborne troops appeared peacekeeping brigade. The compound is formed on the basis of the 31-th separate airborne assault brigade. It will perform tasks under the auspices of the UN or the Collective Security Treaty Organization.


The brigade received the status of a peacekeeping compound on June 1, reports "Russia 24". It includes only contract servicemen. Meanwhile, this brigade does not exhaust the peacekeeping potential of the Airborne Forces. By the end of the summer, one battalion will also be formed in each airborne division, also staffed by contractors, who will also take part in peacekeeping operations.

Programs designed for 1,5 and 5 months have been developed to train the personnel of the peacekeeping units.

Recall, after the peacekeepers from Austria left the Golan Heights, Russia took the initiative to send in return for the Austrians its peacekeeping contingent, if the UN agrees.

However, the international organization stated that the agreement on the zone of separation between Israel and Syria and the protocol between these states does not allow the participation in this mission of the countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council.
Originator:
http://bratishka.ru/
27 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Wedmak
    Wedmak 11 June 2013 10: 34 New
    +6
    However, the international organization stated that the agreement on the zone of separation between Israel and Syria and the protocol between these states does not allow the participation in this mission of the countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council.

    If it were not for at least some influence of Russia on the statements of the UN Security Council (veto and blocking on one-sided statements of a gang of democratizers), it would be possible to calmly leave this organization.
    1. Jin
      Jin 11 June 2013 10: 55 New
      +4
      Yes, Herods from the Security Council will now mock, as they can, for our position on Syria. Although everyone understands that our peacekeepers are the key to security on the Syrian-Israeli border ...
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 11 June 2013 11: 00 New
        +2
        Yes, Herods from the Security Council will now mock, as they can, for our position on Syria.

        Well, mocking them is bad at it. So far, only a panic screech and furious yapping is heard.
        1. Jin
          Jin 11 June 2013 11: 06 New
          0
          Quote: Wedmak
          Well, mocking them is bad at it. So far, only a panic screech and furious yapping is heard.


          Well, for now ... they’ve already so mastered in the matter of * shitting and sucking * that they will not rust behind them. Although we often, recently, react very painfully for them. And it pleases.
          1. Orel
            Orel 11 June 2013 11: 19 New
            +4
            Russian peacekeepers in Syria may appear. The ban on peacekeepers of the Security Council member countries was not introduced by the organization’s charter, but by a resolution specifically on the Arab-Israeli conflict. If Israel and Syria agree to the presence of Russian peacekeepers, and the Security Council passes a resolution, our peacekeepers will be there.
            1. 755962
              755962 11 June 2013 11: 50 New
              +1
              Israeli Interior Ministry spokesman: Tel Aviv is not opposed to deploying Russian peacekeepers to the Golan Heights
              This statement was made by Deputy Interior Minister Faina Kirshenbaum, who is now visiting Moscow. She noted that now the conflict region may be left without observers from the international community, so Russian assistance would be out of place.

              “We heard that some countries decided to withdraw their peacekeepers because they were injured. We are very sorry, although there was an agreement that forces would remain there. If President Putin decided to enter his forces, then I do not think that Israel will confront. We always want someone to be there to really monitor the situation, ”Kirshenbaum said on the air of Ekho Moskvy radio station.


              http://russian.rt.com/article/10457
          2. The comment was deleted.
  2. Vtel
    Vtel 11 June 2013 10: 39 New
    +2
    However, the international organization stated that the agreement on the zone of separation between Israel and Syria and the protocol between these states does not allow the participation in this mission of the countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council.

    But without Stalin's support for the project of creating a Jewish state in Palestine, this state could not have been created in 1948.
    So today's Jews remember kindness, they now have their own - kosher truth.
  3. Bashkaus
    Bashkaus 11 June 2013 10: 48 New
    +9
    By the end of summer, one battalion will be formed in each Airborne Division
    We have 4 divisions, each with a battalion, plus 31st infantry ball battalions, we get up to 5 battalions, or almost a whole regiment of peacekeepers ready to fall over the heads of overheated Democrats in the sultry sands of Syria in a matter of hours. And most importantly, please note no intervention, exclusively peacekeeping forces in blue berets, or rather helmets
    1. Jin
      Jin 11 June 2013 10: 57 New
      +1
      Quote: Bashkaus
      exclusively peacekeeping forces in blue berets, or rather helmets


      More precisely in blue berets and helmets drinks
  4. Grigorich 1962
    Grigorich 1962 11 June 2013 11: 02 New
    +3
    We ought to "pacify it everywhere! Where necessary! ... so that not a single extremist infection picks up ..... and soak, soak, soak .... who disclosed mother’s hail to Russia or is plotting for her ..... Enough of democracy and tolerance ... it only harms us .... in the World, as before, ONLY RESPECT is respected ..... and we can and should become such a force
  5. sashka
    sashka 11 June 2013 11: 13 New
    +1
    The word "peacekeeping" has recently evoked a feeling of fear. It has been spoiled to such a state .. Maybe we’ll change the Georgians in Afghanistan. And maybe the Serbs can be disconnected. It’s possible to drive the "opposition" across the country. Exaggerated of course, but we live in Russia. Everything can be .. How does it turn further. "Foreign Legion" . By the way, in a recent article, someone suggested taking prisoners to the Army. That's where they all trample .. Restore order and another country ..
  6. rudolff
    rudolff 11 June 2013 11: 25 New
    +3
    One battalion regiment could be equipped with immigrants from the North Caucasus. For peacekeeping operations in regions with a predominantly Muslim population, the optimal solution. A similar mentality, knowledge of Arabic, and they love to fight.
    1. ultra
      ultra 11 June 2013 11: 42 New
      +3
      Quote: rudolff
      knowledge of Arabic

      Well, you are bent!
      1. bask
        bask 11 June 2013 12: 19 New
        +1
        Quote: ultra
        the battalion regiment could be equipped with people from the North Caucasus

        Greetings ultra, rubolff hi , two days in all comments just about this and write.
        Thoughts agreed.
        Airborne troops acquired a peacekeeping brigade

        And it’s time for the Airborne Forces to acquire modern armored vehicles. 5-unit .. BMD4M in '13, this is a shame for such a great country like Russia !!!
    2. Akhtuba73
      Akhtuba73 11 June 2013 13: 22 New
      0
      Quote: rudolff
      For peacekeeping operations in the regions

      Quote: rudolff
      , and they love to fight.

      Fire a glade, dear ... Who does it really say about the fighting? Extremely Peacekeeping Efforts wink
  7. rudolff
    rudolff 11 June 2013 12: 07 New
    +2
    Ultra, they learn the Koran in Arabic. There are from whom to select if desired.
  8. urich
    urich 11 June 2013 12: 08 New
    +2
    I do not consider it necessary to hang up the function of peacekeepers on the Airborne Forces.
    1) Performing peacekeeping functions, there can be no talk of any combat training. These units will forget about the VDP for at least a long time. Everything will be reduced to maintaining the combat readiness of posts and mobile groups. In these conditions, it is more expedient to use motorized rifle units. Well, perhaps to maintain the image of the Airborne Forces, where it’s hot, there are Uncle Vasya’s troops.
    2) et, what kind of conflict is it where it is necessary to use airborne and airborne assault units as police force (which peacekeepers are actually)? Well, they would have said right away that the moral-volitional qualities in the Airborne Forces are better developed among the fighters, therefore the Airborne Forces are again in this hole. Why no one thought of special forces to make peacekeeping forces? Because they are prepared for SPECIAL tasks. So the Airborne Forces are essentially being prepared for SPECIAL missions. But the concept of using airborne forces clearly contradicts the concept of peacekeeping forces. Inconsistency.
    p \ s he himself served in the Airborne Forces and "made peace." I would very much like that peacekeeping was a cover for high combat readiness and the ability to break off anyone who receives the “face!” Command, and not vice versa, when the unit guards itself at the checkpoint, but it is proudly called peacekeeping.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 11 June 2013 12: 17 New
      +1
      I would very much like that peacekeeping was a cover for high combat readiness and the ability to break off anyone who receives the "face!"

      In fact, the Airborne Forces, marines and special forces are the most combat-ready units. And their presence in the peacekeeping zone just testifies to this. If anyone is rocking, either side will tear both. Otherwise - what for a goat button accordion?
      when a unit guards itself at a checkpoint, but it is proudly called peacekeeping.

      I dare to hope that this applies only to Western "peacekeepers." Somehow strange they arrive when they didn’t shoot, everything was relatively quiet - they stood and beat their heels in the chest with a heel, supposedly we keep calm. As a pair of bullets flew and wounded the "peacekeeper" - feet in arms and draping. What kind of soldiers are they after that, what can they guard ???
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 12 June 2013 03: 31 New
        0
        Quote: Wedmak
        I dare to hope that this applies only to Western "peacekeepers." Somehow strange they arrive when they didn’t shoot, everything was relatively quiet - they stood and beat their heels in the chest with a heel, supposedly we keep calm. As a pair of bullets flew and wounded the "peacekeeper" - feet in arms and draping. What kind of soldiers are they after that, what can they guard ???

        Remember the Dutch in Kosovo ...
    2. vilenich
      vilenich 11 June 2013 14: 54 New
      +1
      Quote: urich
      I do not consider it necessary to hang up the function of peacekeepers on the Airborne Forces

      I agree with you. This is somewhat like pulling a blanket. The peacekeeping function seems to be completely useless for the Airborne Forces.
      1. Jin
        Jin 11 June 2013 15: 06 New
        +1
        Quote: vilenich
        I agree with you. This is somewhat like pulling a blanket. The peacekeeping function seems to be completely useless for the Airborne Forces.


        It’s all about the motto of the Airborne Forces “Nobody but us!” That is why they want to send the best, to perform tasks unusual for them ... This is the trust and confidence that the Russian paratrooper will cope with any task IMHO has set for him. Apparently our leadership is afraid to settle down again in front of the world community, that’s why they stick to the gallows of the airborne forces, so that everything would be exactly
        1. vilenich
          vilenich 12 June 2013 06: 30 New
          0
          Quote: Jin
          It’s all about the motto of the Airborne Forces “Nobody but us!”, That's why they want to send the best,

          Most likely the way it is! And it’s quite possible that Shamanov struck for a better motivation for service in the Airborne Forces, respectively, better picking quality, and of course for increasing funding!
  9. LOCKS
    LOCKS 11 June 2013 12: 14 New
    0
    Vryatli on the Golan will let our peacekeepers. This will greatly complicate the process of democratization and the ability to cover the conflict in an appropriate manner. But we proposed and in response began nodding to the UN, the opinion of which is being listened to selectively.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 11 June 2013 12: 19 New
      0
      in response, nods began at the UN to the opinion of which they were being listened to selectively.

      The opinion of the UN means nothing at all. They listen to the opinion of the United States and Great Britain, and the United Nations, like boobies, nod their heads. It’s just these two that our soldiers in the Golan don’t need - to inflate the conflict then it will not work.
  10. rudolff
    rudolff 11 June 2013 12: 43 New
    +1
    The question of why, in addition to the Samara brigade, it was necessary to prepare peacekeeping units in the structure of the airborne forces, is of course interesting. They simply cannot realize their full potential. Completely different tasks. I had to communicate with officers who served in blue helmets. Really practically do not have any power powers. It is not for nothing that the Americans draw up any military presence and their allies under the auspices of NATO, and not the UN.
  11. cartridge
    cartridge 11 June 2013 12: 51 New
    0
    I understand that this is a candidate for placement in the Golan ?!
  12. KononAV
    KononAV 11 June 2013 13: 00 New
    0
    Wasn’t it before?
  13. Navuxonastupil
    Navuxonastupil 11 June 2013 13: 34 New
    +1
    But is it time to form the Expeditionary Corps? Goals and objectives: protecting the interests of the Russian state beyond its borders.
    1. Volkhov
      Volkhov 11 June 2013 14: 00 New
      0
      The army is small, if you form a corps, there will be no one left in the NE - if there are security officers on every desert dune, then there will be a defender of interests ... agitate this elite.
  14. cpk72
    cpk72 11 June 2013 14: 04 New
    0
    News of the week: Bye Austrians in bunkers
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 11 June 2013 14: 31 New
      0
      Instead of the Austrians there will be peacekeepers from Fiji
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 12 June 2013 03: 41 New
        0
        And what is Fiji? from ViKi -
        The Armed Forces consists of two components of the ground forces (army) and the naval forces. Compared to other countries in Oceania, Fiji has fairly large ground forces (6 infantry battalions and 1 combat battalion - 3200 people), and is an active participant in UN peacekeeping missions in various parts of the world. At the moment, has no aviation.

        less than in the Baltic states ...
  15. serjant4
    serjant4 11 June 2013 14: 33 New
    0
    So maybe we can form a couple of tank divisions as peacekeeping and enter the region ... Let the amers get out of control
  16. PSih2097
    PSih2097 12 June 2013 03: 38 New
    0
    Those from Cuba, those from the Airborne Forces are not very different in preparation. And if you recall how they broke the South African team, so in general ...