Military Review

Popular Front: why is it needed

43
Popular Front: why is it needed

11-12 June will be the founding congress of the Popular Front “For Russia” movement. The Chief Editor of “However,” Mikhail Leontyev is one of its founders.


Why the Popular Front?

The tasks that the country is really facing - those tasks that Putin formulated in his electoral articles (even in such a very politically correct form) - are, in fact, the tasks of survival. Under the conditions of the global crisis, when the entire current economic, political, ideological system, the entire existing world order is steadily falling apart, the current Russian economy, completely dependent on external conjuncture, will not live. With this economy, the country will not survive. Another economy with the current state of the state, elites and society will not be able to build. Mobilization of everything healthy and loyal to one’s own country is needed. Therefore - the front. In fact, this is the last chance to launch development without another political catastrophe.

If the idea of ​​the Front is formulated as a broad coalition around the goals and objectives of development, there is no reason not to join it.

The front is one more chance to fill the policy (first of all - the policy of the current government) with clear, meaningful meanings, behind which the actions corresponding to them cannot but stand. Meanings whose carriers in the current political discourse - systemic and non-systemic - do not exist in a blatant way. Because none of the existing political forces formulates any answers to the above challenges.

There is the party "United Russia", which in fact is no party in the political sense of the word (as, indeed, all the other "parties"). This is a tool burdened with the technical tasks of servicing the policies of the current ruling coalition. In content, this coalition can be described as a coalition of “patriots, crooks and traitors.”

The front is positioned as a supra-party social movement, as a mechanism of direct interaction between the people and the authorities. With the aforementioned absence of real parties, with our probably, many skeptical attitude towards parliamentarism, parties and representative democracy in general, the Popular Front in the form it is positioning itself now is a type of some alternative political system - in principle, quite interesting in terms of search for alternatives to the current liberal-democratic model.

This is really a chance to feed on him numerous civic activists on the ground who are engaged in a particular case, rather than “fighting the bloody regime”, butting about it continuously with some local superiors. In general, this may be the traditional Russian mechanism for addressing the tsar through the heads of evil boyars — the only one that has always ensured the popular legitimacy of the Russian government.

Given that Putin remains the only political figure in Russia, the Popular Front is, after all, the front of the struggle for Putin. Including - within Putin himself.

That is, with all the risks that again “the Kalashnikov assault rifle will turn out”, there is no reason not to try.


FROM THE EDITION OF THE MAGAZINE "However"

Dear readers! We ask you to undertake a difficult job - right now to take part in the congress of the All-Russian Popular Front, which will begin on June 11.

In short, from readers who are ready to directly influence the situation in the country, we are waiting for concrete and clear explanations: what each of them may be ready to do not as a philistine, but as a member of the public movement. No advice is needed, what should others do - we are talking about our own applications.

Your proposals will be published in a special issue of the journal However, devoted to the congress, which will be presented by us there.

We ask you to realize the responsibility of this work. In practice, this means that we are waiting for concrete proposals from specific people who are ready to do what they offer - as practical as possible and as clearly stated as possible.

Therefore, the remarks, consisting of emotional slogans or global claims to the authorities, the urgent demands of someone to plant, personal opinions about the future and world order, remarks are too short or irrelevant to work, as well as funny jokes and internal dialogues between commentators will be immediately removed .

Thanks in advance for your help.

It depends on you what will be the ONF - the next profanation of civic activism performed by “professional social activists”, political technology decoration or a real movement filled with real content from real active citizens.
Interview with State Duma deputy Yevgeny Fedorov 23 in May 2013.

Talk about man-made crises, American agents, the device of Russian power and street support All-Russian Popular Front.

Author:
Originator:
http://www.odnako.org/blogs/show_26049/
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Karabu
    Karabu 7 June 2013 18: 40
    0
    Quote: author
    The Popular Front is, after all, the front of the struggle for Putin. Including - inside Putin himself.
    I think everyone understands the true purpose of this project
    1. sincman
      7 June 2013 18: 54
      +2
      New video with Fedorov.
      Talk about the role of everyone in the liberation movement, television, migrants, foreign agents, the work of specialists on the collection of archival data for the accusation of Gorbachev M.S. etc. I think many will be interested.
      1. bask
        bask 7 June 2013 19: 11
        +4
        Popular Front: why is it needed

        edrosam, no one else does not believe.
        the front of the people is a fallback in case of complete bankruptcy of edrosia.
        1. ronin
          ronin 7 June 2013 19: 39
          +3
          Totally agree with you. On our outskirts it is very noticeable. Sane people are already leaving the ranks of edra.
          1. ronin
            ronin 7 June 2013 23: 27
            +3
            "There is no freedom, neither here, not there ... Where to sail ??? I do not know, captain ...."
            It would not be, but there is a rational link in this article: What are you ready to do?
          2. zart_arn
            zart_arn 7 June 2013 23: 36
            +7
            Quote: ronin
            Sane people are already leaving the ranks of edra.

            The sane people did not enter the BUCKET.
        2. baltika-18
          baltika-18 7 June 2013 20: 33
          +5
          Quote: bask
          edrosam, no one else does not believe.
          the front of the people is a fallback in case of complete bankruptcy of edrosia.

          This is probably true. I don’t believe either the EP, the Front, Putin, Fedorov, or the goats .. from the State Duma.
          1. sincman
            7 June 2013 23: 05
            +3
            Quote: baltika-18
            I do not believe either EP, or the Front, or Putin, or Fedorov

            And what will you do now? What is your plan to save Russia? Or do you notice other problems besides household ones? Share with the people ... It would be very interesting to know. Maybe we will choose you as a leader. Ready to take it?
        3. sergaivenski
          sergaivenski 7 June 2013 21: 18
          -1
          I agree with you. Only the "Petersburg" clan will not give up the power just like that.
          cue !!!
        4. fisherman
          fisherman 7 June 2013 21: 21
          0
          what each of them can and is ready to do not as a layman, but as a participant in the national movement. No advice is needed on what others should do - we are talking about our own applications.
        5. smile
          smile 7 June 2013 22: 10
          +3
          bask
          But in my opinion, the question is not that. that the party, l / s which was formed (and could not otherwise) from other parties. The question is. how to create something decent, having that staffing. that is .... well, how to limit the entry of careerists and dishonest people there ... even the CPSU of the times of Stalin was not guaranteed from this. You must understand that defeat any other party, and everything bad that is in the bucket will quickly pour into a new party ... any ... therefore, maybe you should not gloat with convulsive attempts to find the optimum?
          And who else to believe? In addition to the Communist Party, you have nothing to name ... but it is in such a state that .....
          1. DeerIvanovich
            DeerIvanovich 8 June 2013 12: 50
            0
            in a state to which the Communist Party indicated the Kremlin and no more. and so plus for the post - rightly said.
      2. UFO
        UFO 8 June 2013 06: 55
        +2
        Thanks for the video. I often watch Fedorov, he is right. And the parasites only put the minuses, and then they will flutter that they were in the forefront, like in the movie "State Border" - "Tell Kesha, why did we do a revolution with you ...." sad
    2. optimist
      optimist 7 June 2013 19: 47
      +4
      That's right ... Another performance for L.O.Kh.ov. I remember that once this house was called our house Russia, and there is still a lot of other things that you cannot remember. By the way, another indicative informational opus is the divorce of our "king". Apparently, the global p ... c is somewhere already quite nearby. As far as I remember, at the end of 2011, when the people were buzzing in the swamp, an old Jewish prostitute and a young gay announced their wedding. laughing True, no one saw a marriage certificate ...
      1. smile
        smile 7 June 2013 22: 21
        +2
        optimist
        It's amazing to read such rubbish here ... tell me, you delightedly poking around in other people's dirty cowards ... savor p-ts ... then, probably, talk about bad house 2, degradation ... no, I understand that for you people are those who are in the swamp, and then the absolute majority are against the hirelings of Pu .... but maybe it is worth knowing the measure, huh? It's disgusting ...
        1. optimist
          optimist 7 June 2013 22: 30
          0
          Dear, let's not talk about other people's cowards ... If you do not understand, then I explain: I am not worried about the sex life of individuals (I have enough of mine), but how the people of Russia are primitively and brazenly brainwashed with cheap information stuff. And let's not talk about the majority for Pu: 146%, "drawn" at one time by Comrade Churov, clearly show how all this is done. I remind you about the elections-96, when the freak-ebna also "chose the majority." am
          1. smile
            smile 7 June 2013 23: 29
            +5
            optimist
            Allow, but how to understand this:

            "another indicative informational opus, a divorce of our" king. "Apparently, a global p ... c is already quite near. As far as I recall, at the end of 2011, when the people were buzzing on the swamp, an old Jewish prostitute and a young gay their wedding has been announced. "

            even to quote disgusting ... what are we brainwashed about if termination of Pu's marriage is one of the arguments?
            And let's not lie about the fact that you suddenly did not believe again that Pu just won the election ... remember that he really won and won not because the most ... moderators will beat ... but because everything the rest will simply ruin the country ....
            I have a family, friend, friendship with dad, an old secretary, 64 years old, wife-55, chief accountant of one of the largest enterprises in the region, two sons, 34-sapper, Chechnya, my own, daughter-in-law, FSB, I knocked out her apartment ... the younger became a friend ... a person who is unique in intellect ... well, etc. the family is big ... and so, all were enemies of Pu ... three participated in the election commissions ... everyone honestly said, everything is honest .... therefore do not lie and do not duplicate someone else's lie ...
            1. optimist
              optimist 7 June 2013 23: 49
              -4
              Let’s, dear smile, discuss about half a year or a year later. And YOU personally, and your friends and relatives will swear an idol on what the light stands. For only the blind can not notice that the country is flying downhill. I do not want to croak, but Russia-2013, is the USSR-1990. And if you are more or less observant and have the ability to think logically, you should notice it.
              1. smile
                smile 8 June 2013 00: 35
                +3
                optimist
                I already saw the country going downhill ... and I voted for Primakov and barked about it with my stepfather ..... and I saw how she miraculously twisted ... now the picture is very different ... of course - we'll wait ... where to go then ... I understand you ... but I do not understand people who rejoice in difficulties .... what better can you do?
                I will be happy to talk with you both in time and tomorrow .... I'm generally sociable ... most importantly, I am peaceful!
                let's get better, huh?
        2. Merchant
          Merchant 8 June 2013 03: 58
          -1
          smile I totally agree with you !!!
          You see how the Swamps got wild!
          Everything mumbles with .... m !!! am
      2. AdAAkRuSS
        AdAAkRuSS 8 June 2013 02: 20
        0
        Quote: optimist
        Exactly ... Another performance for the L.O. I remember once this D.E.

        I remember, and still there is Our house Israel - the political national-patriotic party of Israel. The party was formed in January 1999. The leader of the party and its creator is Avigdor Lieberman. What are the suspicious names, did these pGOeKtIs arise in the same heads?
    3. Atlon
      Atlon 7 June 2013 19: 50
      +5
      Quote: Karabu
      I think everyone understands the true purpose of this project

      Not everyone ... Enlighten! wink
  2. sergo0000
    sergo0000 7 June 2013 19: 10
    +6
    Our system does not imply the participation of a simple worker or small businessman in political games; therefore, this appeal does not apply to a simple layman, except of course, besides conscientious work for the benefit of the owner of the enterprise or a senior official (who is not a fact that he is not a thief). crying
    Maybe there are ministers or governors among us!? Then of course.
    1. fisherman
      fisherman 7 June 2013 21: 24
      +1
      what each of them can and is ready to do not as a layman, but as a participant in the national movement. No advice is needed on what others should do - we are talking about our own applications.


      Our system does not imply the participation of a simple worker or small businessman in political games. Therefore, this appeal does not concern a simple layman.


      quite right, this appeal is not to the layman, because here, if you were careful, there is no appeal to political games :)))
    2. sergaivenski
      sergaivenski 7 June 2013 21: 26
      0
      Every minister is a dishonest figure !!! But now we would hold a referendum with an agenda: “Do you trust the existing system of state power and administration?” And most of those who come to this referendum will unequivocally say: “No” !
      Only the authorities will not take this step !!! Who wants to pack their bags?
      1. smile
        smile 7 June 2013 22: 27
        +1
        sergaivenski
        Yeah, and if ministers are elected there, they will soon be convinced that they have chosen much larger thieves than they could even imagine ... then you will be like those degradants who went to the State Emergency Committee to overthrow the mumble - we were deceived, we did not know ... to think with our heads did not try ... passionaries fucking ....
  3. Just Vasilich
    Just Vasilich 7 June 2013 19: 27
    +1
    Knock Knock! This is me, the postman Pechkin, brought an announcement on the site annual survey-2013 "Evaluation of state and political figures". Here is the link:

    http://topwar.ru/29025-anons-opros-ocenka-gosudarstvenno-politicheskih-deyateley
    -2013.html

    This is a repeat of last year’s survey, which had a wide response on the site. This year, the content of the survey has been significantly reduced and supplemented. Now the list of respondents (survey objects) is limited to only ten policies:
    1) Joseph Stalin
    2) Nikita Khrushchev
    3) Leonid Brezhnev
    4) Mikhail Gorbachev
    5) Boris Yeltsin
    6) Vladimir Putin
    7) Dmitry Medvedev
    8) Viktor Yanukovych
    9) Alexander Lukashenko
    10) Nursultan Nazarbayev

    To participate in the survey, you must submit an application in any form to the email address [email protected] In a reply message, survey participants receive an Excel questionnaire file, which must be returned in the completed form. until 20 June 2013.

    Mailbox [email protected] waiting for your applications!
  4. Russ69
    Russ69 7 June 2013 19: 56
    +3
    Let this front be, just so that it does not grow into a party structure. And so, when various public, party and other organizations are included in it, this gives a more balanced policy. Only on this front, we must more confidently declare ourselves.
    The fact that the front does not look west in the mouth is already good ....
  5. knn54
    knn54 7 June 2013 20: 23
    +2
    The Popular Front should be a social movement, which would include adequate, reasonable citizens - patriots, in contrast to the EP - a party of officials, Duma members and other careerists.
    Well, to unite PATRIOTIC forces.
  6. snn
    snn 7 June 2013 20: 24
    +5
    The idea of ​​the front has already failed. EP officials seeing that this party is no longer legitimate go to the front. As a result, the front turns into a backup version of the EP. Therefore, the front cannot change anything. The second drawback is personal loyalty to Putin and Medvedev, and therefore all this turns the front into a new United Russia and the people will not have support, and therefore the next falsification of the elections, and as a continuation, FRONT-EP
    1. Atlon
      Atlon 7 June 2013 20: 30
      +1
      Quote: snn
      seeing that this party is no longer legitimate

      Well, firstly LEGITIMATE, and secondly, why did you attach the particle NOT ?! what
    2. smile
      smile 7 June 2013 22: 46
      +2
      snn
      Explain why Pu, who himself understands that careerists from all opposition parties ran into the bucket, does not have the right to create something more adequate (frantically create, and I do not envy him)? He must think about creating a normal staff ... or do you like everything in a bucket? And something again you brought a bagpipe about the election? You do not like the choice of our people? Speak your choice, maybe the people will follow you ... only, please, do not lie anymore .....
      1. Atlon
        Atlon 8 June 2013 09: 06
        0
        Quote: smile
        Explain why Pu

        Explain, what is "Pu"? belay

        Quote: smile
        or do you like everything in a bucket?

        In which bucket ?! what Why do the buckets not suit you? And what kind of buckets are you talking about? About plastic, galvanized, enameled, how much? Please express yourself more clearly!
  7. cartridge
    cartridge 7 June 2013 20: 28
    -5
    No fronts are needed ... Yes, and the parties in their present form have degenerated, and not only in Russia. My proposal: The All-Russian Zemsky Sobor, which will elect the Tsar as in 1613 with the proviso that existing politicians - from Putin to the white puppies - are deprived of the right to stand for election. The future Tsar of Slavic origin at the age of 30-35 years should become a compromise figure that suits all the leading political forces of Russia. And then the inherited monarchy and autocracy! And no elections, parties, fronts, NGOs or other political stray, squandering the country's money and preventing it from developing normally.
    What are the objections to the merits?
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 7 June 2013 20: 37
      +2
      Quote: cartridge
      The future Tsar of Slavic origin at the age of 30-35 years should become a compromise figure that suits all the leading political forces of Russia. And then the inherited monarchy and autocracy!

      Monarchy in its purest form, not for our time. Yes, kings can be different, and that’s all, sushi oars ...
      Moreover, to find a strong personality that suits everyone is practically impossible. And in the place of the first person of the state and it does not matter what it is called, there must be a strong and decisive person. Mamlu Gorbachev or DAM is not necessary ... Thanks, ate.
      1. gizz
        gizz 7 June 2013 22: 40
        +1
        So, personal loyalty to President Putin is at least bad, and the tsar is good and worthy. What if Putin becomes king?
        1. Russ69
          Russ69 7 June 2013 22: 47
          -1
          Yes, at least someone, no difference ...
    2. str73
      str73 8 June 2013 18: 10
      +1
      They will give you a king with an American passport in your bosom! And let’s heal, right?
  8. bubla5
    bubla5 7 June 2013 20: 56
    +1
    Previously, during the collapse of the USSR, special services created popular fronts everywhere to control the situation, and now something is wrong
    1. smile
      smile 7 June 2013 22: 55
      0
      bubla5
      Unfortunately, these fronts were not created by our services, not by our agents of influence, remember how it ended? ... and now something is wrong too ... no one has canceled the Cold War ... excuse me for intolerance but now there’s a war going on, and the side that wants to save Russia is trying to do something ... I don’t know how successfully. I don’t like this movement either, but I need to do something ... otherwise we all will have to go to the Gulf of Bothnia ... (Thanks Volkhov, for the phrase stolen by me! :))))
  9. pinecone
    pinecone 7 June 2013 21: 11
    +3
    Convulsive power movements. Well, what kind of Popular Front can be together with gozmans, helmans and other posers, or hordes of foreigners with passports of the Russian Federation, not to mention the activists and passivists of the pedo-community? The very word "homosexuality" was banned for their relatives the other day.
    By the way, it would be interesting to know the estimated quantitative composition of this "All-Russian Popular Front" and who will head it.
  10. nickname 1 and 2
    nickname 1 and 2 7 June 2013 21: 19
    0
    ***** This is a tool burdened with solving the technical problems of servicing the policies of the current ruling coalition. ******
    But are there any people who are otherwise in politics?
    Author! Individual individuals are disinterested, but not a party!

    **** In content, this coalition can be described as a coalition of “patriots, swindlers and traitors.” *****
    And here you are wrong! Are they signed? painted?
    They say that folding is in unison, but in clandestine they have their own selfish goals and intentions! How to sort them?

    Revive the KGB? No! Poorly!

    So it will be so in the NF!


    You yourself figure it out! Do you professionals call for help WHO?
    Do you need a booth? Fresh LITTLERS needed?

    No! We are not against it - to work well ..... (and what else is needed?).
    You just stop "hanging dogs" on each other!
    In the country = child's play "the cat is dead, the tail has gone, whoever is silent has eaten!"


    ****** It depends on you what the ONF will become - another profanity of civic activism performed by "professional social activists," .... ****
    From U.S? Ah, so we must teach you how and what to do?

    ****** In practice, this means that we are waiting for specific proposals from specific people who are ready to do what they offer - as practical and as clearly as possible stated ******
    This is not SF but "Hello, we are looking for talents"

    Where to dial them to the front?
  11. Karabin
    Karabin 7 June 2013 21: 35
    +4
    The front is another chance to fill politics (first of all - the policy of the current government) clear, meaningful meanings, for which the actions corresponding to them cannot but stand

    That is, the front is needed in order to influence the current government? Not to take power through elections and disperse the old one (and to put someone in jail), namely to "fill with meaning" the current one a coalition of "patriots, crooks and traitors." And what kind of patriots are these strange, who are in the same gang with crooks and traitors?
    In general, this may be a traditional Russian mechanism for addressing the tsar through the heads of evil boyars


    Damn, I recall, when the Public Chamber was created, something similar was also declared. But the Evil Boyars won again. But if the Tsar is so kind and good, why in his administration he will not create a unit for communication with the people, through the heads of the boyars? In the age of information technology, any information and voiced idea is available. Or the administration also has boyar people. Then the King is no longer the King, but a Misunderstanding.
    Given that Putin remains the only political figure in Russia, the Popular Front is, after all, the front of the struggle for Putin. Including - within Putin himself.

    P **** C! It turns out that it is not enough to elect the President, to empower him with the highest powers, and the front also needs to be created to protect him. What kind of weakness did you choose, compatriots? And something I did not hear before the election from the proxy of candidate Putin, Mr. Leontyev, such garbage that his principal would be ineffective. On the contrary. Putin is a man, Russia is ahead, stability and development. And now fight for Putin inside Putin. And what more to do neher, how to persuade Putin? Is he a girl to break him? Or is Leontiev hinting that inside Putin is another, but slightly different Putin? Actually, when two people get on in one person, it’s schizophrenia. But I will believe more quickly in deviations from Leontyev than from Putin.
    Your suggestions will be published in the special issue of the journal “However,”

    Based on them, with the correct revision, the next empty projections of power will be made. In words, everything will be beautiful.
    It depends on you what the ONF will become - another profanity of civic activism performed by “professional social activists”,

    That is what will become, has already become.
    1. optimist
      optimist 7 June 2013 23: 41
      0
      Dear Karabin! I completely agree with you and am glad that there are still people who are able to think logically. Most of our population has porridge in their brains from propaganda cliches of central television channels. Modern PR-technologies allow a person to fool his head so much that he is not only for GDP, but will vote for the shooting of his mother ...
    2. Normal
      Normal 7 June 2013 23: 52
      -1
      Karabin
      Plus ... I literally took it off my tongue good
  12. 1goose3
    1goose3 7 June 2013 21: 40
    +1
    Quote: Russ69
    Let this front be, just so that it does not grow into a party structure.

    This is inevitable, everything that happens is the process of formation of a real political force, which means a party, and the party is no less influential than United Russia. If you want the process of moving away from the actual one-party system, the chances and influence of the Communists increase significantly, and this is already a multi-party system, not formally, but in fact. hi
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 7 June 2013 22: 49
      -2
      If the front is reborn into a party, then this is already bad. Then party discipline and other delights will begin to operate.
  13. individual
    individual 7 June 2013 21: 47
    0
    The task of any power is actually entering this power(capture) and hold her leverage.
    If according to the Western scheme, then two competing parties are created that change each other in the event of the failure of the economic policy of one of them.
    The parties are changing, and the control levers are in the hands of the elite and puppet performing the will of the puppeteer.

    There has always been one ruling party in Russia. The attempt to create a second batch failed just because of the artificiality of its creation and the fear of competition.
    The party "United Russia" has gone through all the turns of development and at each turn overgrown with shells corruption, nepotism, opportunism and separation from ideas and their software installations. The United Russia party has outlived its usefulness.
    The creation of the Popular Front means the organization of a new, purified stage of the same political structure under a different name, which in 2-3 years will turn into a copy of United Russia.
    Until several competing parties are naturally reproduced in Russia naturally, all parties will be clones of the current party in power.
    1. smile
      smile 7 June 2013 23: 05
      0
      individual
      If it will be
      "the organization of a new purified stage of the same political structure under a different name"

      So what's wrong with that? It's time to clean! Other parties are not going to clean up, although the composition, in principle, is the same ... it turns out that Pu - the only leader bothered to really do something ... and what, again, are dissatisfied? Or have those who propagandized you already consulted at the embassy? :)))
  14. sergey261180
    sergey261180 7 June 2013 21: 54
    -4
    Hmm.
    In the context of the global crisis, when the entire existing economic, political, ideological system, the entire existing world order are steadily falling apart,
    Decaying capitalism, it is so decaying. In my opinion, only Russia is falling apart.

    The front is positioned as a supra-party social movement, as a mechanism of direct interaction between the people and the authorities
    Have you tried to make these elections?

    The front is another chance to fill the politics (first of all, the politics of the current government) with clear, meaningful meanings
    So what are you there, don’t know why you are sitting? Isn’t it easier to get out of there already? Or not: Putin is still too little in power ...

    The Popular Front is, after all, the front of the struggle for Putin. Including - inside Putin himself.
    This is more likely to a psychiatrist. Complete nonsense.

    Surkov as an ideologist was better.
    1. smile
      smile 7 June 2013 23: 09
      -1
      sergey261180
      Hmm


      I agree - complete nonsense ... you. You ... would ... heal, or something ... yes, I will not forget the traditional question of a psycho, but who should have been chosen in your opinion? ... do not be shy, tell us ...
      1. sergey261180
        sergey261180 7 June 2013 23: 48
        -2
        Argument.
        1. smile
          smile 8 June 2013 00: 49
          0
          sergey261180
          It’s possible tomorrow, eh? They throw pillows at me, ... oh ... and other harder things .... or softer ... everything, tomorrow, I should read this and that, damn it, I don’t know if it will work out. ..
        2. smile
          smile 8 June 2013 01: 11
          +1
          sergey261180
          Explain yourself.
  15. Cpa
    Cpa 7 June 2013 21: 56
    0
    Six months ago, I wrote an application for entry, filled out a questionnaire. For some reason, a registration was required .. request Since then, there has been no reaction from the organizers. Why are they nominal and faceless fighters?
    1. smile
      smile 7 June 2013 23: 10
      0
      Cpa
      The excess of the artist ... :)))
  16. APASUS
    APASUS 7 June 2013 22: 01
    +3
    Another maneuver of power, how to transfer power from the right hand to the left !!!
  17. Vladomir
    Vladomir 7 June 2013 22: 08
    -1
    Lenin created the party from the end of the 19th century, and only by 1917 was he able to take power in Russia. Putin did not have and does not have such terms. We all know WHAT Putin received from Gorbachev-Yeltsin. It was necessary to carry out a major overhaul of the Russian house without evicting the tenants - Russian citizens. And to carry out repairs with those forces that faithfully served Gorbachev-Yeltsin in the collapse and sale of the country. Therefore, Putin created the United Russia party from the material that was at the moment. History did not give him a decade of swing. Yes, United Russia is not ideal. Is there an ideal of the party in the world? But she fulfilled the task of the UNITY OF RUSSIA. Therefore, I think the next task will be to create a powerful, strong and great Russia.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 7 June 2013 22: 33
      +2
      Quote: Vladomir
      Lenin created the party from the end of the 19th century, and only by 1917 could take power in Russia. Putin did not have and do not have such terms.

      but there is power since 2000.
      1. gizz
        gizz 7 June 2013 22: 46
        +2
        It is noticeable that many on the site understand "power" as some kind of magic wand: I have it, wave it, wish anything and it will come true IMMEDIATELY. Does the expression "the king make the retinue" tell you anything? I think Putin does not really want to repeat the fate of Paul I, for example.
    2. sergey261180
      sergey261180 7 June 2013 22: 52
      +1
      History has not given him a decade of buildup
      Of course, 13th floor is not 10.
  18. Umnichka
    Umnichka 7 June 2013 23: 47
    +3
    We need the mobilization of all healthy and loyal to our own country. Therefore, the Front.

    You can’t say more precisely.
  19. Normal
    Normal 8 June 2013 00: 37
    +3
    Of course, the efforts of television to debilitate the population are bearing fruit. But there is also a side effect; television workers themselves are debilitated, and apparently even more so than the object of influence. There is nothing to be done, the specifics and costs of the profession.
    Here is one of two things. Either Leontiev considers us simply fools who are not able to understand what is written and said, or he himself is inadequate.

    the current Russian economy, completely dependent on the external environment, will not live. With this economy, the country will not survive.

    It was this economy that Putin created during his entire, not very short term. But Leontiev believes that we are all not aware, or not in ourselves, and offers to rally around the GOOD KING.
    In general, this may be the traditional Russian mechanism of addressing the tsar through the heads of evil boyars - the only one that always ensured the people's legitimacy of the Russian government.

    That is, Leontiev believes that we did not study at school and we can get involved in this fuzzy popular story about evil boyars and the good king, and in all seriousness. He does not even doubt that it should be so; he said - we believed. Well, how does he feel about it after that? After that, it is somehow not even convenient to talk about the rest of the demagogy and the lies of which the whole Leontief article is composed. Well, Leont'ev considers people to be i-diots, probably he has the right; for so many years it will erase into our eyes and ears and nothing passes.
    The front is one more chance to fill the policy (first of all - the policy of the current government) with clear, meaningful meanings, behind which the actions corresponding to them cannot but stand. Meanings whose carriers in the current political discourse - systemic and non-systemic - do not exist in a blatant way. Because none of the existing political forces formulates any answers to the above challenges.

    It’s good to lie. There are meanings and actions and their carriers:

    this coalition can be described as a coalition of "patriots, crooks and traitors."

    To steal with impunity, this is the meaning of the life of the current elite. All their actions are due to this over-task. It was Good Putin who gathered this coalition under his own hand. It is he who is their guarantor and roof, and Leont'ev offers to organize massive, popular support for them and the opportunity to continue to live happily ever after.
  20. georg737577
    georg737577 8 June 2013 01: 04
    +2
    God forbid Putin to see the REAL national front ...
  21. shurup
    shurup 8 June 2013 01: 11
    +1
    Raikom closed - everyone went to the Popular Front.
    In ancient times, the people's front corresponded to the city militia, built in the phalanx and, under the guidance of strategists, designed to repel the attack of external enemies. Internal problems were solved by a meeting of citizens on the Agora, i.e. referendum.
    An attempt to organize the phalanx at present can be equated with an unconstitutional coup, and the strategist, who is plotting it, is in dictatorial aspirations.
    In ancient Rome, dictatorial powers were given to elected consuls only for the time necessary to solve a specific problem.
    I would like to clarify and clarify the goals and objectives of creating the Popular Front in Russia.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. imguskov
    imguskov 8 June 2013 05: 14
    0
    Leontiev asks what would I specifically do?
    1) Returned to Russia reserve and national funds, it does not matter in which city in Moscow or Krasnoyarsk the main thing is that it be under the complete control of the state with the obligatory control of the people in the person of a control and audit commission and regular reporting of this commission to the people of Russia.
    2) Allocated sufficient monetary allowance to pensioners, people with disabilities, doctors, teachers, the army, police and fundamental science with a mandatory report from the Academy of Sciences on the work done and the control of the revision committee.
    3) He banned the sale of oil, gas, timber, metals, especially rare earths, not only to America and Europe, but also to any other country, in other words, would have banned the export of natural resources. Extraction, processing of the listed natural resources only within the country. I foresee the war of the oligarchs and parasites - they do not know how to work, let them plant potatoes to create technologies. The cessation of speculation by natural resources will entail restrictions on income in the non-production sphere (artists, buffoons, media, writers, poets, resellers, shuttles, bloggers, etc.), and this in turn will provide a powerful incentive to engage in production, quality, and implementation of projects, improving the work of the media, etc.
    4) I would have conducted a couple of demonstrative lawsuits against fraudsters and bribe-takers, the demonstration processes would not help, would have introduced the death penalty for especially serious crimes.
    5) In all ways, monetary, moral, social, stimulated the development of military science, would raise a soldier on a podium of both moral and educational nature and material incentives.
    And many more things I would have done, for example, I would have released V.V. Kvachkova would have treated in the best sanatoriums of Russia and appointed Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation.
    1. UFO
      UFO 8 June 2013 05: 26
      0
      So, right on points? Then the war would have started yesterday! But are we strong enough, rearmament of the army, as if we would defend the country? Who will say? request
      1. sincman
        8 June 2013 08: 56
        0
        After reading all the reviews, I can say with a 99% probability that the "infidels" simply did not watch the interview with Fedorov until the end, if they did at all! This can be seen from the above argumentation. Nevertheless, those who really looked to the end will agree with me - Fedorov's logic and argumentation is iron! It fits very clearly into the events taking place in Russia and the world. So, either he is a genius of lies, or he is really telling the truth!
        1. Normal
          Normal 8 June 2013 10: 04
          +2
          Quote: sincman
          Fedorov’s logic and argument are iron!
          To think so, one must be a very naive person. Or really want everything to be really the way Fedorov says.
          You are right, I have never been able to watch and listen to Fedorov to the end. The fact is that I see with my own eyes the exact opposite of what Fedorov says. For two and a half hours, take tons of noodles on your ears, realizing that it’s precisely a blatant, limitless lie and still continue to listen? Sorry, but I'm not a masochist.
          Maybe you in Ukraine and it seems that Fedorov
          really telling the truth!

          But I do not see and know this power on TV. When the GDP came to power, I worked in the structure of the Public Administration of the Presidential Administration. So I know perfectly well the methods and goals of Putin's appointees, which means that there are not many of his methods and goals. But Fedorov didn’t even
          The genius of lies
          , and liar, though unscrupulous, but very mediocre. If you wish, to find constant and egregious contradictions, fraud and substitution of the actual wishful, outright lies will not be difficult. AT DESIRE. You don’t have such a desire, but many sober-minded and really looking at the world people don’t want to lose hours of their life on the pro-Putin liar Fedorov. There were already plenty of them (pro-Putin propagandists) and there will be more.
          1. sincman
            8 June 2013 15: 41
            0
            Quote: Normal
            To think so, one must be a very naive person. Or really want everything to be really the way Fedorov says.

            Well, then, when in his first interviews Fedorov just started to raise the issue of NGOs as foreign agents and hidden polit. management through these organizations, such as you, "literate and sane" (employees of the KhozU UD ... and the like) twisted at the temple, calling it complete absurdity and lies! And what do we see now ?! This is already a generally accepted fact! Everyone already knows about the CIA agents who worked with Chubais. I think the new information that Fedorov announced will be confirmed in the near future. So "sober-minded and really looking at the world" some kind of inconsistency turns out. So who is the lie?
        2. imguskov
          imguskov 8 June 2013 19: 43
          +1
          I agree with your conclusions: - "either the geniuses are lies, or they really tell the truth"
          We have been fooled so many times that now it’s hard to believe in something! God grant that he does not lie. But I do not believe Putin, although there are some arguments: - Nazarbayev is harassing Erdogan, Putin has hit for Merkel, maybe he will manage to persuade Europe to his side? What about Obama? But Obama began to visit the oracle - the hair on the ass tears.
  24. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 8 June 2013 06: 12
    +1
    Stupidity is utter. What do they expect from the people? so that everyone shouts with joy and tripled energy to work for the oligarchs, so that they become even richer. Why did someone decide that the people are just sleeping and see how our oligarchs would become even more rich. Are there really those who think that our officials are simply burned out at work for our good. Personally, I do not see any prerequisites for helping the existing government.
    1. sincman
      8 June 2013 09: 00
      0
      Solo, find 4,5 hours and watch until the end of 2 videos with Fedorov, and then you will give ratings. Have you agreed? And it’s so easy to brand the idea without understanding its basics ...
  25. DAOSS
    DAOSS 8 June 2013 17: 30
    +1
    I read everything, I completely watched 2 videos, I read all the comments, BUT instead of clarity, only questions appeared:
    1. I still do not understand WHY Putin will not disperse from power (the Cabinet of Ministers, the Administration, etc.) all Americans and traitors?
    2. HOW was colonial Russia allowed to fight with Georgia? Putting spokes on Syria? Dare the "owner" of missile defense in Europe?

    And, in principle, the idea is good and time-tested, Do you want to unite the nation, give people external enemy.
    But the fact that Putin is poor is sitting in his office surrounded by American agents and can’t do anything, I DO NOT BELIEVE !!!
    He could distribute profitable state business and super contracts to his friends SUPER TESTED min defense and his waffle he can not ???
  26. DAOSS
    DAOSS 8 June 2013 18: 01
    +3
    And more.
    If everyone has long been convinced that capitalism is a dead end, so let's return to socialism, naturally we will take into account the mistakes made in the past, we will correct the program of the communists and go! build a bright future !!! I, by the way, this is quite serious.
    Of course there is a chance of war, but is it better to live as slaves ??? It’s a shame before our ancestors, they perished for our freedom, our unity, and WE ??? Separated, ragged, Union fouled, lost freedom, a sense of unity, travel ... We sit at home, drink vulture, smoke cheap cigarettes and watch TV shows and extreme events thereby exacerbating depression.