Military Review

In the United States successfully tested the long-range RCC LRASM

27
In the United States, successful tests were carried out on the vertical launch of long-range anti-ship missile (LRASM) long-range anti-ship missiles (anti-ship missiles). The Lockheed Martin missiles were launched from the Mk 41 vertical launcher (TLU).


As the Lockheed Martin company reported, four launches of LRASM missile simulators were carried out, which, when launched, broke through the upper covers of the TLU cells made of composite material. The purpose of the test was to verify the release of the missiles from the TLU without damaging its design, the receiver of the air pressure and the covering of the missiles themselves. Tests were conducted to assess the risk of using new anti-ship missiles from VPU Mk 41 using Lockheed Martin funds as part of integrating new anti-ship missiles into ship armaments and evaluating their successful operation as offensive anti-ship weapons OASuW (Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare).

LRASM missiles are autonomous high-precision anti-ship missiles, launched outside the object defense zone, and are intended for use in the Navy and the US Air Force.
At the end of 2013, Lockheed Martin will conduct flight tests of the LRASM BTV (Boosted Test Vehicle) missile from the TLU Mk 41, and at 2014, it will conduct two flights of guided test missiles using federal means.

The new LRASM RCC is being developed to replace the outdated Boaring RCC "Harpoon". The need to create a new anti-ship missile system is due to the fact that the missiles in the US Navy’s arsenal do not have sufficient flight range and are vulnerable to the breakthrough of a modern ship defense system. The LRASM program is designed to demonstrate options for weapons that could quickly enter service with the Navy after the completion of flight tests in 2013-2014.

ROV LARSM is equipped with armor-piercing or high-explosive warheads, is an autonomous all-weather weapon that can be used at any time of the day.

The rocket is equipped with a multimode homing head, a data transmission line, and an improved digital noise-proof satellite navigation system for detecting and destroying the highest priority targets in a ship's warrant.
Originator:
http://www.itar-tass.com/c134/760672.html
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Edward72
    Edward72 6 June 2013 07: 18 New
    -1
    Let them fly home in peace to their ship
  2. shinobi
    shinobi 6 June 2013 07: 48 New
    +2
    That is, they did something equivalent to "granite", as I understand it. Achievement.
    1. Alpha-omega
      Alpha-omega 6 June 2013 08: 07 New
      +1
      Subsonic anti-ship missiles with a radius of 800 km., The supersonic version is not extended. (http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/LRASM)
    2. gregor6549
      gregor6549 6 June 2013 08: 14 New
      +9
      Granite is, alas, yesterday, if not the day before. Therefore, one cannot speak of equivalence in this case. Moreover, in addition to a much greater range, modern multi-mode missile homing and data exchange with other interacting systems, this anti-ship missile has much smaller dimensions and weight than Granite and can also be launched from unified vertical launch installations that are widely used on ships of various like the US Navy and its allies, not only for anti-ship missiles, but also for other types of missiles. Those. advantages, at least on paper, compared with Granite, mass. Here's how this RCC will show itself in real life is a big question.
      1. Arberes
        Arberes 6 June 2013 14: 53 New
        +3
        Quote: gregor6549
        Here's how this RCC will show itself in real life is a big question.

        It is naive of course to believe that Amer will calm down on this? They will try to increase the speed of their RCC. I wonder how we are doing with combat information management systems.
        1. gregor6549
          gregor6549 6 June 2013 16: 40 New
          10
          RCC speed is not an end in itself, because with an increase in the RCC speed, its maneuverability decreases. It is known that it’s much easier to detect, take on stable tracking and therefore intercept at a given line a non-maneuvering target than maneuvering. In addition, the size of the target and therefore its effective reflective surface play a large role. Granite, however praised, was still a monster. Yes, and his widely publicized intellectual abilities, including the ability to fly in a "flock" and the ability to take control of all other anti-ship missiles, "flocks" have never been tested and confirmed in a real combat situation, including under the conditions of applying active interference created by modern Means of ReB channels for the exchange of data between missiles. But the multi-mode GOS on the discussed RCC is serious. Such a GOS and special management is not required. The target itself will be found in the given sector, it will identify it, and it itself will ensure the guidance of the RCC on this target. Moreover, at different stages of homing, various homing methods (from passive and active, to their combinations) can be used that provide a rational relationship between stealth RCC and the probability of hitting it with a target

          And further. There is a proposal to carefully assess the advantages and disadvantages of weapons and military equipment of a potential enemy i.e. not panicking over the advertisement of the next "wunderwaffe", but not throwing his caps on it (even if the fur industry has achieved excellent production indicators for their production). And do not fall for the subtle flattery of the authors of articles in "foreign" media and specials. magazines. Flattery is a dangerous thing. Lulls .... sometimes to death
    3. PLO
      PLO 6 June 2013 09: 24 New
      +6
      That is, they did something equivalent to "granite", as I understand it. Achievement.

      there is nothing special about LRASM
      this is a common subsonic CD, all the innovations come down to a control system, however it is also a lot
  3. igor36
    igor36 6 June 2013 08: 11 New
    +2
    But how loudly written are the successful tests for the vertical launch of new missiles. Actually testing a missile simulator on a launcher. PR is the main weapon of the uslovtsy.
  4. bulvas
    bulvas 6 June 2013 08: 46 New
    +7
    They are trying in vain if Rogozin in the very near future does not restore order in the USC, they do not have to spend much on new RCC - anyway, there will be no goals
  5. Svarog
    Svarog 6 June 2013 08: 46 New
    +2
    Previously, they used schemes for presentations, now they have to shoot a whole expensive film .. it’s not surprising that everything is so expensive for them. An interesting assignment for engineers is already being issued as well - like, "I want this crap to fly like this. And knock it like this," then the video clip. "Engineers" shoot their video in response, everyone is happy.
    1. bulvas
      bulvas 6 June 2013 08: 49 New
      +6
      nothing expensive - simple computer graphics
      1. urzul
        urzul 6 June 2013 09: 27 New
        +2
        But enemy ships are very well identified
  6. Wedmak
    Wedmak 6 June 2013 09: 17 New
    0
    Subsonic ... So what, that a large radius, it will be cut off by the ship’s air defense without straining. Unless dozens of them run.
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 6 June 2013 12: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: Wedmak
      Subsonic ... So what, that a large radius, it will be cut off by the ship’s air defense without straining. Unless dozens of them run.

      the problem is that they will fly in dozens, because the cost of the ship and a dozen missiles are not comparable ...
  7. Idolum
    Idolum 6 June 2013 09: 50 New
    0
    "Achievement" however ...))) And they said the arms race is yesterday ...
  8. Vtel
    Vtel 6 June 2013 10: 06 New
    0
    Yes, we can also answer.
    X-35 anti-ship missile:
    A powerful warhead allows one missile to destroy a warship with a displacement of 5000 tons. Flight speed (number M) - 0,8 - 0,85

    3M55 Onyx
    Weight: 3100 kg
    Speed ​​at altitude: 750 m / s
    Surface Speed: 2 M
    Range:
    along a combined trajectory - 300 km
    along a low-altitude trajectory - 120 km
    flight altitude 10-14000m
    Warhead weight: 250 kg
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 6 June 2013 11: 28 New
      +6
      300 km and 800 km - is there a difference?
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 6 June 2013 12: 26 New
        +2
        Quote: Wedmak
        300 km and 800 km - is there a difference?

        Well then, the same P-1000 "Volcano" is quite comparable, the problem is only with target designation ...
      2. gispanec
        gispanec 6 June 2013 13: 26 New
        +1
        Quote: Wedmak
        300 km and 800 km - is there a difference?

        Of course there is, only as long as there is no exact data on the onyx, only its export brother, and besides, our caliber flies on dial if the memory does not change from 1500 to 2500 km .... so we need to compare them
        1. Don
          Don 6 June 2013 14: 08 New
          0
          Quote: gispanec
          our caliber flies to the sound if the memory does not change from 1500 to 2500 km

          Caliber 3M-54E1 firing range 300 km.
          1. PLO
            PLO 6 June 2013 14: 19 New
            +1
            Caliber 3M-54E1 firing range 300 km.

            all export missiles have a range limit of 300km under the MTCR agreement
        2. Windbreak
          Windbreak 6 June 2013 15: 57 New
          +1
          Quote: gispanec
          our caliber flies to the sound if the memory does not change from 1500 to 2500 km
          This applies to the ZM-14, designed to destroy ground targets. In general, there are the words of Rear Admiral Sergey Alekminsky, commander of the Caspian flotilla: "I’ll say that the best ship is not in quotation marks, but that it is the first surface ship in history, which is armed with the latest Caliber missile system, which is not found on more than one Navy missile ship. In principle, more than one surface ship now doesn’t have such long-range firing as our ship. It shoots more than two thousand kilometers on a coastal target. And 350 kilometers for marine purposes. "
          http://echo.msk.ru/programs/voensovet/947115-echo/
          1. PLO
            PLO 6 June 2013 16: 07 New
            +1
            This applies to the ZM-14, designed to destroy ground targets

            it doesn’t matter
            with the same success it can be equipped with the ARGSN only pointlessly, the range of subsonic cruise missiles is up to 5000km, but their speed makes their aiming at large distances impossible, and no efficiency
            Americans have already abandoned anti-ship tomahawks, the new LRASM is essentially the same as they just got a new stylish design and a new breo
  9. Sharingan
    Sharingan 6 June 2013 10: 29 New
    0
    And we will have (I hope) a new anti-ship missile system BrahMos.
  10. Army1
    Army1 6 June 2013 10: 32 New
    -3
    At a time when the Americans will make supersonic anti-ship missiles, one of our destroyers with hypersonic missiles.
    Well, you can’t say anything beautiful, and of course we are bad guys again. And the rocket seems to go around the visibility zone of naval air defense comes from the stern and the explosion is from the side, I doubt that the Yanks have such technologies, breddddddddd.
  11. sergey158-29
    sergey158-29 6 June 2013 11: 06 New
    +1
    The fact is that the Harpoon anti-ship missile system is not capable of launching Mk 41 from the cells (VPU), so they make a new anti-ship missile system for it, but I still hope that the Russians have something to answer for, because anti-ship missiles are their thing !? !
  12. Good fellow
    Good fellow 6 June 2013 14: 36 New
    -2
    Once again, Americans naively believe that our ships will go like blind kittens: we don’t have detection stations, including over-the-horizon ones, the helicopter in the sky does not scan space, and the order ships do not duplicate each other, and there are no satellites at all. But they have .... they have yes, everything is there. Of course the graphics are impressive. Our ships look very beautiful. But they could have put the Dagger instead of the Ak-630, and if we further develop our imagination, then we can also launch Zircons and Bramos-2 in our response, the caliber is the same, but what It will be beautiful. The adversary may not know that we don’t have them yet, so the video is all one, the public will like it! Abroad!
  13. igor36
    igor36 7 June 2013 11: 17 New
    0
    Quote: PSih2097
    the problem is that they will fly in dozens, because the cost of the ship and a dozen missiles are not comparable ...

    Then you need to order rockets from hundreds of Chinese, it will be cheaper. Against hundreds, not a single air defense can stand.