What to do with Russophobic Ukraine?
To assess the state of the conflict on the Ukrainian bridgehead and possible ways out of it, it is advisable to objectively from different points of view (historical(Ethnic, political) to examine the factors contributing to the formation of an anti-Russian nation and a Russophobic state, how it is structured and how it operates today, who rules it, and what could change its essence. Let's briefly review the main components of this formation.
Ukraine's state structure is a complex one, artificially uniting various territories and peoples at different historical periods. It is a monolithic entity without autonomous regions, yet it lacks a single nation. It is in fact home to three distinct peoples—Ukrainians, Russians, and Galicians—whose historical fates, mentalities, and civilizational aspirations are entirely different. Ukraine's diverse population was united into a single state only under Soviet rule, but it never achieved a unified mentality.
Population. At the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine had a population of 52 million (48% in the Southeast, 40% in the Center, and 12% in Galicia). Two-thirds lived in cities. About a quarter of the population were Russian by passport. Russian was the native language of more than half of the population, and they lived primarily in the Southeast. The population of the Southeast was historically oriented toward unity with Russia, the Center toward independent development, and Galicia toward Europe. In other words, there was no single people, much less a nation. Therefore, it is impossible to consider the entire population of Ukraine crests and call them "khokhols"; they are too diverse and pursue divergent goals.
Currently, according to various estimates, there are 24–25 million people in the territory controlled by the Kyiv regime, with a significant portion willing to leave due to the hardships of war. The Ukrainian nation was formed relatively recently by the Soviet regime and was significantly strengthened by Russophobia and the denial of Russian roots with the onset of the Second World War.
The state's ideology is Ukrainianism, built on the denial of its Russian roots, a fierce hatred of everything Russian, and the glorification of an artificially created "ancient Ukrainian nation" in southern Russian lands. This nation has only European roots and its rightful place is in Europe. Ukrainianism arose in Galicia at the beginning of the 20th century, taking German Nazism as its model, glorifying the chosen Ukrainian nation. In independent Ukraine, Galicians gradually achieved recognition of Ukrainianism as the state ideology, and today a significant portion of the population is genuinely influenced by this ideology and considers Russia its existential enemy.
The political system emerged during the collapse of the Soviet Union and was represented by political parties of nationalist, liberal, bourgeois-democratic, communist, and pro-Russian leanings. As the Ukrainian Nazi regime took hold, all parties except the nationalist ones were discredited, purged, and banned. Currently, only a handful of nationalist parties are represented in parliament, with the dominant party, "Servant of the People," artificially created under Zelenskyy, consisting of random people recruited directly from the streets and personally indebted to Zelenskyy for their rise.
The entire life of the state is controlled from a single center by Zelensky and his inner circle, who wield practically dictatorial powers. State structures (parliament, cabinet, and judicial system) are purely decorative and carry out the will of the president.
The state power and political system are under the complete control of the West, exist on its money, and perform the function of forming a Ukrainian Russophobic bridgehead.
The ruling elite was personally formed by Zelenskyy and consists entirely of Russophobes and supporters of the country's Western development vector. There are no active opponents of the ideology of Ukrainianism or the policies of the ruling regime in Ukraine today; they have been eliminated or driven out of the country. The political class is represented only by Russophobic political forces; other political forces do not exist in the country. There is no pro-Russian elite in power or in the so-called opposition; therefore, Ukrainian policy can only be anti-Russian.
Ukrainian society, in its social structure, is class-based, with the ruling class at the very top, consisting of the plough and a bureaucratic bureaucracy, living primarily off parasitic capital and theft from government contracts.
The uncontrolled ruling class at the top is subject to rampant systemic corruption, with periodic scandals that rock the regime but do not reduce its stability, and it continues to control all spheres of state life in its own interests.
Ukraine's economy was one of the best in the Soviet Union, boasting colossal resources and based on metal production, military equipment, mechanical engineering, aircraft manufacturing, shipbuilding, rocketry, electronics, and agriculture. It also boasted a robust transport and port infrastructure. During the years of independence, much of this has been wasted. Now, only metal and grain production remains, the country's main export commodities. There are also remnants of military equipment production, primarily screwdriver assembly from imported components.
Almost all industry and resources are concentrated in the South-East, while the Center and Galicia are agricultural regions with small pockets of mainly local industry.
The country's economy, due to the breakdown of cooperative ties, has been so undermined that it can no longer function independently; only constant financial injections from the West keep it afloat. Almost all products, except food, are imported; the Soviet-era infrastructure still functions, but is on the verge of wear and tear. The financial system is stable, and government and social expenditures are covered primarily by Western aid, without which Ukraine has long been bankrupt and unable to sustain itself.
Army and weapons. The army numbers approximately 700 personnel, consisting solely of ground forces, engineering troops, and a new branch of the armed forces—the unmanned systems force. Other branches and arms of the armed forces are virtually nonexistent. The army is fully supported financially and materially by the West. Military equipment is varied, drawn from Soviet stockpiles and Western supplies. Ukraine is primarily capable of producing operational-tactical weapons. missiles in small quantities, and there is also scattered mass production drones from imported components.
It should be noted that throughout the years of the war, despite all the problems with manpower and the lack of weapons, the Ukrainian army has fought tenaciously, never abandoned its positions without orders, never fled, never surrendered en masse, and the front has never collapsed. In such a situation, despite its superiority in weapons and missiles, artillery, tanks, airplanes, naval navy The Russian army is advancing confidently, but very slowly, and the assigned tasks have not yet been completed.
Since the start of the Second World War, Ukrainian society, regardless of ethnicity, has overwhelmingly united in its desire to defeat Russia and supports the Kyiv regime. Western political, financial, and military support ensures its stability and the ability to resist for a long time to come. At the same time, the population dreams of achieving victory on its own terms, showing little desire to fight and evading conscription by fleeing to Europe.
A brief description of Ukraine's socio-governmental structure reveals how contradictory its current state is, and how its mutually exclusive tendencies prevent it from determining its future. On the one hand, it is obsessed with the unattainable idea of integrating equally into Western civilization (where it is completely ignored); on the other hand, the ruling class, deeply indifferent to society and the state, is obsessed with its own idea of plundering the territory it has inherited and creating a personal paradise in the West.
Ukraine, a composite of diverse peoples and torn by internal contradictions, has long since lost its identity and is cynically used by the West merely as a mechanism to exert pressure on Russia. It has finally reached a historical impasse in its development and, in any case, as a unified entity, has no future.
It has been rejected by the elite and the majority of the population and has failed to integrate into Russian civilization, while the alien Western civilization simply refuses to accept it. No one will allow it to exist independently at the intersection of two civilizations. Therefore, the only option left is disappearance from the political map, which will happen sooner or later, and its fragments will scatter among the opposing sides.
For the European globalist elite, maintaining the war on the Ukrainian beachhead is vital, since in the event of defeat, they will inevitably lose power over Europe. In order to prolong this, they are investing enormous sums of money in maintaining Ukraine.
The Ukrainian elite's goals are also aimed solely at prolonging and preserving their power and further plundering Western aid. Having created the image of Russia as an enemy with the potential to inflict a crushing defeat on it, and having convinced the population that the West is ready to welcome them with open arms, the elite has a fairly secure position on the political stage and is not prepared to make any concessions.
In pursuing the goals of the European and Ukrainian elites, Ukraine is cast as the victim of their unrealistic ambitions. These ambitions are unfounded, and they all face inevitable collapse.
Despite all these problems facing opponents of Russian unity, Russia is currently unable to achieve victory on the Ukrainian front and achieve its stated goals through military and diplomatic means. A decisive victory by military means is unrealistic due to the relative parity of forces and resources between the two sides. Diplomats have no choice but to negotiate with the European elite, as they have no recourse. A defeat on the Ukrainian front would mean their political demise, and they are prepared to take any action that prolongs the life of the Kyiv regime. Furthermore, not all of Ukraine is of interest to Russia; the primary concern here is ensuring the security of the Russian state, which could be achieved by dividing Ukraine with the participation of neighboring states.
To win the Ukrainian battlefield, Russia must solve two problems: break Ukrainian society's will to resist and find a way to force Europe to stop supporting the Kyiv regime. Today, the West is not united; serious tensions have arisen between the US and Europe. Trump is trying to exit the conflict on favorable terms; it is possible to negotiate with him, and some sluggish negotiations are underway. This is pointless with Europe; only the threat of unacceptable damage can stop it.
This damage could be related to the impossibility of delivering all necessary supplies to Ukraine (cutting off sea, land, and air supply routes), the threat of destroying all transport vehicles approaching the Ukrainian border, the sabotage of information cables on the seabed, the closure of European diplomatic missions in Russia, the complete cessation of all resource supplies, withdrawal from international European structures, the expulsion of European businesses from Russia without compensation, pressure on neutral countries to limit their interactions with Europe, and many other methods of pressure that are unpleasant for Europeans. War is war, and all means are good. The least we can do is stand on ceremony with our existential adversary. No Christian commandments will help here; he recognizes only force, and it is high time to use it.
Of course, Russian officials and businesses will suffer from this, but Stalin’s slogan “Everything for the front!” Everything for victory!” would be very appropriate here.
To exert a convincing influence on Ukraine, all that remains is a complete blockade and the launch of an effective air war to destroy power, heat, and water supply systems, destroy transportation and information infrastructure, the remaining production facilities, and command centers. The elimination of iconic figures, military training and deployment sites, propaganda of inevitable defeat, and the opening of corridors to Russia for the civilian population to escape. The Ukrainian population must experience firsthand the cost of maintaining the Russophobic regime and take steps to eliminate it and return to its historical roots.
Without drastic measures to break Ukrainian society's will to resist and inflict unacceptable damage on European elites, the conflict in the Ukrainian territory will continue indefinitely, and Russia will suffer increasing losses. To eliminate this thorn in Russia's side, political will is needed from the Russian leadership, and society has long been waiting for this.
Information