Production, operation and export of Chinese J-5 and J-6 fighters

4 858 34
Production, operation and export of Chinese J-5 and J-6 fighters

The emergence of Chinese aviation The Soviet-backed industrial revolution occurred in the 1950s, and for a considerable period of time, the PLAAF was equipped with Soviet-designed combat aircraft, either directly acquired or licensed. After relations between Beijing and Moscow soured in the early 1960s, Soviet-Chinese military-technical cooperation ceased, and the onset of the Cultural Revolution severely and permanently hindered the development of China's aviation industry.

From the 1950s to the 1980s, China produced the J-5 (MiG-17), J-6 (MiG-19), and J-7 (MiG-21) fighters, as well as the H-5 (Il-28) and H-6 (Tu-16) bombers. Attempts were made to develop indigenous combat aircraft, of which the J-8 interceptor (an entirely indigenous design) and the Q-5 attack aircraft (based on the MiG-19) reached serial production.



Although Chinese combat aircraft were generally inferior to their Soviet counterparts in terms of build quality and technical reliability, and China produced outdated versions equipped with very simple avionics, they were exported. The buyers of the relatively inexpensive Chinese aircraft were, in most cases, Third World countries that lacked the resources to acquire modern combat aircraft or, for whatever reason, were unable to obtain Soviet equipment. weapon on credit.

J-5 fighters and JJ-5 combat trainers


Following the armistice on the Korean Peninsula, the Soviet Union continued to supply jet fighters to China. In the 1950s, air battles between PLAAF and ROC Air Force jet fighters regularly occurred over the Formosa Strait, and there were also numerous incursions into Chinese airspace by Taiwan-based reconnaissance aircraft. In the mid-1950s, PLAAF pilots, following the Soviet-made MiG-15 and MiG-15bis jet fighters, mastered the MiG-17F, which received the local designation J-4 (Jiān-4).

In mid-1956, assembly of MiG-17F fighters, initially designated Type 56, began at the Shenyang plant. Fifteen assembly kits, along with parts for 10 aircraft, were delivered to China. In addition to the transfer of technical documentation, extensive training was undertaken for Chinese specialists. After full production was established in China, the Chinese equivalent of the MiG-17F received the designation J-5 (Jiān-5), and the VK-1F engine was designated the Wopen-5 (WP-5) in China.


Fighter J-5

In its basic characteristics, the J-5 fighter was no different from the Soviet MiG-17F. The aircraft, with a maximum takeoff weight of 6070 kg (13,500 lbs) with drop tanks, had a practical range of 1240 km (750 mi). The turbofan engine, with afterburning thrust of up to 3380 kgf (7,000 lbs), could accelerate to 1145 km/h (780 mph) at an altitude of 3000 m (9,800 ft). Cruising speed was approximately 500 mph (800 km/h). The service ceiling was 52,500 ft (16,600 m). The integrated armament consisted of a 37 mm Type 37-1 cannon (a copy of the H-37D) with 40 rounds and two 23 mm Type 23-1 cannons (a copy of the HP-23) with 80 rounds per cannon. Bombs weighing up to 220 lbs (220 lbs) or 400 liter (100 gal) drop tanks could be suspended under the wings on two boom racks.

In terms of their operational and combat characteristics, the MiG-17F and its Chinese counterpart were highly successful combat aircraft, ensuring their long service life. Due to their high reliability, simplicity, and low maintenance, these relatively simple aircraft were used for a long time alongside supersonic fighters and, in the final stages of their careers, were used primarily as attack aircraft.

In the late 1950s, documentation was received for the MiG-17PF interceptor, equipped with an Izumrud (RP-1) radar sight and armed with three NR-23 cannons. The radar sight was equipped with a separate antenna for target acquisition (in the central part of the air intake) and a separate antenna for target tracking (in the upper "lip" of the air intake), allowing for simultaneous surveillance and automatic tracking. The detection range was several kilometers. At night or in poor weather conditions, the interceptor was guided to the target by commands from the ground.

The Chinese version of the MiG-17PF was designated J-5A. Due to the end of Soviet support, construction of the prototype was delayed, and its testing only began in 1965.


J-5A interceptor

Due to the fact that the J-5A interceptor was already largely outdated at the time of testing, in the late 1960s, China created a version equipped with a radar capable of seeing a target at a distance of up to 10 km, and its armament included missiles PL-2 (a licensed version of the Soviet P-3S, which, in turn, was a copy of the American AIM-9B Sidewinder missile).


A modernized J-5A interceptor is on display at a museum.

Due to increased drag, the J-5A interceptor's maximum speed was lower than that of the radar-less J-5 frontline fighter, reaching 1130 km/h. Maximum takeoff weight also increased to 6135 kg.

A total of 767 J-5 and J-5A aircraft were built by the end of production in 1969. They served in the PLAAF until 1992, and in the latter part of their career, were primarily used for training purposes.

Before the souring of Soviet-Chinese relations, the PLA Air Force received MiG-15UTI trainers from the USSR, but after 1961 this opportunity disappeared, and for in-depth flight training and the execution of training flights, the JJ-5 (Jianjiji Jiaolianji – training fighter) was created in the PRC on the basis of the single-seat J-5 fighter for the purpose of creating a combat-training "twin" fighter.


JJ-5 combat training aircraft

This aircraft featured a two-seat cockpit borrowed from the MiG-15UTI and was powered by a Wopen-5D engine, a non-afterburning clone of the Soviet VK-1A with a takeoff thrust of 2700 kgf. The combat-trainer aircraft was armed with a single 23 mm Type 23-1 cannon. Two external bombs with a total weight of up to 500 kg or drop tanks could be suspended on two external pylons. The maximum takeoff weight was 6087 kg. The operational range with drop tanks was 1160 km. The maximum speed was 1048 km/h. The service ceiling was 14,300 m.


J-5 and JJ-5 aircraft at the Military Museum of the Chinese Revolution

The JJ-5 "Sparca" surpassed the Soviet MiG-15UTI trainer in performance and could be used as a light attack aircraft. A reconnaissance/spotter variant also existed, equipped with an additional radio that operated on ground unit frequencies. The aircraft, which entered serial production until 1986, had 1061 built, was popular with the military, and remained in service with the PLAAF until 2012. Until the early 1990s, the red-and-white, lightweight JJ-5 aircraft were flown by pilots of the Chinese aerobatic team, the "August 1st" aerobatic team.


The JJ-5 aircraft of the 1st of August aerobatic team

In the 21st century, most of the JJ-5s in storage were converted into remotely controlled targets capable of performing intense maneuvers, takeoffs, and landings.

The J-5 family of aircraft is notable for being the first Chinese jet aircraft to be exported. The export version of the frontline fighter was designated the F-5, the interceptor offered to foreign customers was called the F-5A, and the trainer/combat version was known as the FT-5.

The Indonesian Air Force operated twelve F-5 aircraft since 1960. In 1968, Major General Suharto seized power in Jakarta, which led to a reorientation toward American weapons, and all Chinese F-5s were decommissioned in 1970.

In December 1961, Albania received 12 F-5 and eight FT-5 fighters, which initially served in parallel with the Soviet MiG-17F.


A BBC Albanian J-5 fighter jet

The Albanian Air Force had a total of 58 F-5 fighters, which were in service until 2004, but had not been in flight condition since the early 1990s.

In 1965, China transferred ten F-5s to Cambodia. By 1970, six aircraft of this type remained in service. In January 1971, all Chinese MiG-17F clones in the Royal Khmer Air Force were destroyed on the ground in a Viet Cong attack.

In the second half of the 1960s, the Vietnam People's Army Air Force received 25 F-5 fighters, which, according to unconfirmed reports, were flown by North Korean pilots. Some of these aircraft were lost in aerial combat and destroyed in bombing raids. The Americans made no distinction between Soviet MiG-17Fs and Chinese F-5s, so there are no reliable statistics on the number of Chinese-made fighters lost in Vietnam. Several sources claim that in 1966, they attempted to use F-5A interceptors over North Vietnam. However, these attempts were unsuccessful, and the use of these obsolete interceptors at night was quickly abandoned.

Sudan acquired 16 F-5s and FT-5s in 1969. The aircraft continued to operate until the mid-1980s, and were used against separatists in the south of the country.

In 1973, Tanzania received 12 F-5 fighter jets and 22 FT-5 trainers. The aircraft have not been officially decommissioned, but after one FT-5 crashed in 2010, they have not flown.

The Pakistan Air Force operated approximately three dozen two-seat FT-5s since 1975. In 2012, the twin-seat trainers were retired and replaced by Pakistan-built K-8P Karakorum trainers.


Pakistan Air Force FT-5 combat trainer aircraft

Zambia received 12 F-5 and FT-5 aircraft in 1976. However, they did not serve for long and were decommissioned in the early 1980s.

In 1981, the Bangladesh Air Force pilots received 8 F-5 fighters and 3 FT-5 combat trainer aircraft, which were used for training flights.


FT-5 combat trainer aircraft of the Bangladesh Air Force

The active use of these machines ended in 1986, and they were officially decommissioned in the mid-1990s.

The only operator of the single-seat F-5 and two-seat FT-5 is currently North Korea.


North Korean F-5 fighter jet

Deliveries of F-5 and FT-5 fighters to North Korea began in the mid-1960s. The exact number of aircraft of this type donated by China as military aid was never officially disclosed, but US intelligence estimates put the number at no less than 240.


Google Earth satellite image of North Korean F-5 fighter jets at Kusong Air Base. This image was taken in February 2023.

Until recently, two-seat FT-5s served as training aircraft to maintain the flying skills of pilots in aviation regiments equipped with MiG-21, MiG-23, MiG-29 and J-7 fighters.


Google Earth satellite image of FT-5 and MiG-23 aircraft at Pukchan Air Base. The image was taken in June 2022.

According to reference data, in 2023, the number of North Korean F-5 and FT-5 fighters in active squadrons and storage exceeded 100. Western experts estimate that approximately half of these aircraft are capable of flight. However, even with a fully operational, highly skilled, and motivated pilot, engaging in aerial combat with a modern fighter or intercepting a cruise missile in an aircraft equipped with a primitive instrument suite and outdated communications and navigation systems is virtually impossible. Most F-5 fighters are used for training purposes, and they can also be deployed for air-to-air strikes. Approximately 15 years ago, reports emerged that some F-5 fighters in North Korea had been converted into manned cruise missiles, to be controlled by suicide pilots.

J-6 fighters and JJ-6 combat trainers


In the Soviet Union, MiG-19 fighters were produced for a relatively short period, which is why they are largely undervalued. In China, by contrast, these aircraft were mass-produced from 1963 to 1986, with a number of new modifications developed, and the total number of frontline fighters and specialized interceptors built Defense The production of combat-trainer aircraft exceeded 4000. Chinese engineers were able to refine the MiG-19, making it reliable and low-maintenance, and also developed the Q-5 attack aircraft based on it. These aircraft were widely exported, participated in many local conflicts, and earned a good reputation.

China received technical documentation for the MiG-19S frontline fighter, the MiG-19PM interceptor (with the RP-2U Izumrud-2 radar sight), and the RD-9B turbofan engine in the late 1950s. Shortly before Sino-Soviet relations soured, five disassembled MiG-19P interceptors were delivered to a factory in China. An aircraft factory in Nanchang was allocated for the production of the MiG-19P interceptors, designated J-6I, while mass production of the MiG-19S frontline fighter, designated J-6, began in Shenyang in 1963. However, the J-6I proved too complex for the Chinese aviation industry, and assembly was limited to aircraft delivered from the USSR.

Production of frontline fighters was a difficult proposition, and initially, production quality was very poor, with aircraft delivered to customers frequently crashing. The Soviet-licensed Wopen-6 (WP-6) engines, which had a limited service life and were prone to sudden stalls, were particularly problematic. Initially, production J-6 (Jiān-6) aircraft were virtually identical to Soviet MiG-19S aircraft, but over time, Chinese engineers incorporated a growing number of modifications and improvements into the frontline fighter's design, enhancing its operational and combat performance. They also significantly increased its service life compared to the original MiG-19S aircraft. Over time, the J-6 became a highly reliable and effective combat aircraft, serving as the workhorse of the Chinese Air Force for a long period of time.


PLA Air Force J-6 fighter

The early production J-6 fighter had a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 10,000 kg. Its operational range with two 760-liter drop tanks was 2200 km, and without drop tanks, 1390 km. Its combat radius was approximately 650 km. Two WP-6 turbofan engines, each producing 3250 kgf of afterburning thrust (the maximum thrust without the afterburner was 2600 kgf), accelerated it to 1450 km/h at high altitude. Maximum ground speed was 1340 km/h. Cruising speed was 900 km/h. Its service ceiling was 17,900 m.

Initially, the J-6 pilot could use three 30mm Type 30-1 (HP-30) cannons with a total of 195 rounds of ammunition and unguided rocket pods against aerial targets. Some fighters of this type in service with the PLAAF were reportedly armed with three 23mm or two 30mm cannons to reduce weight and improve performance. In the early 1970s, PL-2 homing missiles were added to the arsenal of Chinese frontline fighters, and in the late 1980s, PL-7 guided missiles (based on the French R.550 Magic) were added. The total weight of the combat load, carried on four underwing pods, reached 500 kg.


Because the subsonic J-5A interceptor no longer met modern requirements, China returned to the frozen all-weather interceptor project, and in the mid-1970s, production of the J-6II began. It was equipped with a radar sight and PL-1 (the Chinese equivalent of the RS-2US) and PL-2 missiles. The J-6II interceptors did not carry cannon armament.


A J-6II interceptor fighter on display at a museum.

Thanks to the use of upgraded WP-6A engines with an afterburning thrust of 3750 kgf, the acceleration characteristics of the J-6II interceptor were improved, and the maximum speed at high altitude exceeded 1490 km/h.


Another J-6II interceptor fighter on display at the museum.

Although the J-6's interceptor capabilities were improved compared to previous J-6 variants, by the time serial production began, the J-6II interceptors no longer fully met modern requirements, and relatively few were built. Nevertheless, of the approximately 60 aircraft produced, at least two J-6II interceptors remain in museum collections.

In August 1969, testing began on the J-6III fighter, which was equipped with a modified, larger wing and more powerful WP-6 engines, improving maneuverability and maximum speed. Guided missiles were added to the armament, and a radar sight expanded the aircraft's capabilities for engaging aerial targets at night and in poor weather conditions. In the early 1970s, without waiting for the completion of a full testing cycle, the J-6III entered serial production. However, service with combat units revealed numerous shortcomings, after which mass production was discontinued. By 1977, approximately 300 J-6III fighters had been returned to the factory for modifications, during which some were converted into a variant that differed from the standard J-6 frontline fighters in that it had engines and an expanded armament.

Since the second half of the 1960s, the PLAAF command began to view the J-6 fighter as its primary means of achieving air superiority and air defense, while the subsonic J-5 was reoriented toward strike missions. Supersonic J-6 fighters were repeatedly used to intercept violators of Chinese airspace, and from 1964 to 1971, they shot down more than three dozen American aircraft and jet reconnaissance aircraft. dronesDuring the deteriorating situation on the Soviet-Chinese border, J-6s repeatedly flew 1-1,5 km into Soviet territory. In January 1974, they provided air cover for the Chinese landing on the Paracel Islands. In March 1979, they were used sporadically during the PLA ground forces' invasion of northern Vietnam.


BBC: The PLAAF officially retired the J-6 fighter in 2010, after a sufficient number of fourth-generation J-11 fighters, based on the Russian Su-27SK, had entered service. However, some J-6s continued to be used for training purposes. Several dozen aircraft were operated at flight test centers, where they were used in research programs, preserving the service life of modern fighters. According to Western estimates, 700-800 J-6 fighters were mothballed.


Google Earth satellite image of J-6 fighter jets stored at Lushan Air Base. The image was taken in December 2022.

Subsequently, a significant portion of the stored fighters of this type were converted into radio-controlled aerial targets J-6W, used during exercises and tests of air-to-air missiles and SAMs, as well as into unmanned "air defense breachers" capable of carrying strike weapons.

Hengdogli Air Base, located in the sparsely populated northwestern part of China's Gansu Province, Inner Mongolia, is the PLAAF's combat operations center. A facility dedicated to converting obsolete aircraft into aerial target aircraft operates on the airbase's premises. Satellite imagery analysis shows that all of the J-5 aircraft parked at the facility have been decommissioned, and the facility is currently converting supersonic J-6 and J-7 aircraft.


Google Earth satellite image of J-6 and J-7 fighter jets converted into radio-controlled targets at the Henogli Aircraft Test Center. The image was taken in September 2023.

The area is also home to the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center, China's largest aviation test site, Dingxing, and an air defense test center known as Site 72.

The Soviet Union never produced a two-seat version of the MiG-19, and pilot training for supersonic twin-engine fighters was conducted on the relatively light, subsonic, single-engine MiG-15UTI. Due to the MiG-19's more precise handling and significantly different takeoff and landing characteristics from the MiG-15UTI, pilot training was not always smooth.

Since the J-6 had long been the mainstay fighter of the PLAAF and naval aviation, China began developing a two-seat trainer. The aircraft, designated JJ-6 (Jianjiji Jiaolianji – 6)—a fighter trainer—made its first test flight on November 6, 1970.


JJ-6 combat training aircraft

To accommodate the second cockpit, the JJ-6 fuselage was extended by 84 cm in front of the wing, and additional ventral fins were added to the tail to improve directional stability. The integrated armament consisted of a single 30 mm cannon, but external mounts could carry the same ordnance load as the single-seat J-6. The maximum takeoff weight of the dual-seat version was slightly higher than that of the single-seat version, but its performance was significantly reduced. With the same powerplant, the maximum speed did not exceed 1360 km/h. Cruising speed was 810 km/h. The operational range without drop tanks was 940 km.


A JJ-6 combat trainer aircraft at the Military Museum of the Chinese Revolution.

From 1973 to 1986, 634 two-seat aircraft were built at the Shenyang Aircraft Manufacturing Plant. Operation of the twin-seat JJ-6 aircraft ceased in combat units by 2013, but two-seat JJ-6s, like single-seat J-6s, could still be seen parked at flight test centers until recently.


Google Earth satellite image of J-6 fighter jets, J-8 interceptors, and an H-6 bomber parked at the Xi'an Aircraft Manufacturing Company airfield. The image was taken in October 2021.

Single-seat J-6 fighters received the export designation F-6, while the two-seat combat trainers were known as FT-6s. These aircraft were in demand in Third World countries and became the hallmark of the Chinese aviation industry in the 1960s and 1970s.

The first country to receive the F-6 was Pakistan. The initial batch of 60 units arrived between December 1965 and March 1966.


Pakistani Air Force F-6 fighter jets

These fighters, which entered service with three squadrons, were used with great success in the 1971 war with India. They were used both in air-to-air combat and in strikes against Indian troops. According to official Pakistani data, F-6 pilots shot down one MiG-21, six Su-7Bs, and two Hunters, and damaged four more Indian Air Force aircraft. Four F-6s were acknowledged as lost: one in air-to-air combat and three to ground-based air defenses (one downed by its own anti-aircraft guns). India claimed the destruction of eight F-6s. In 1978, the Pakistani Air Force was reinforced with another 75 single-seat F-6 fighters and three dozen two-seat FT-6s. Of these aircraft, 40 were subsequently transferred to Bangladesh.

In the 1980s, a significant number of Chinese-made fighters operated by Pakistan were modernized, equipped with Western-made avionics and Martin-Baker PKD 10 ejection seats, and armed with American AIM-9P Sidewinder close-in missiles.


After the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, F-6s were used to cover Pakistan's airspace from Afghan and Soviet aircraft. However, the aging F-6s found it difficult to compete with the faster MiG-21bis and MiG-23ML, and in the 1980s, they were replaced in this role by the F-16. Nevertheless, Pakistani F-6s operated alongside F-16s, Mirage IIIs, Mirage Vs, and F-7s until 2002. Two-seat FT-6s continued to serve in Pakistan until 2010.


Pakistan Air Force FT-6 combat trainer aircraft

The F-6 performed well during combat operations in Vietnam. Compared to the MiG-17F, the supersonic F-6 had greater potential for intercepting American tactical and carrier-based strike aircraft. According to Western data, 54 F-6 fighters were deployed to Vietnam by January 1972. According to the memoirs of American pilots who participated in combat operations in Southeast Asia, the Chinese-made MiG-19s posed an even greater threat than the more modern Soviet MiG-21PFs, armed only with missiles. According to Vietnamese data, the J-6s shot down 13 enemy aircraft and helicopters, losing five J-6s (four shot down in aerial combat, and another lost to its own air defenses).

Deliveries of F-6s to Bangladesh began in 1977. The first batch included 12 single-seat and three two-seat aircraft. Later, in the late 1980s, Pakistan donated four dozen overhauled and modernized fighters.


Bangladesh Air Force F-6 fighter jet

The decommissioning ceremony of the last F-6 fighter jet in the Bangladesh Air Force took place on March 27, 2002.

In late 1975, China transferred 16 F-6 fighters to Cambodia. The Khmer Rouge attempted to use these aircraft to intercept Vietnamese aircraft and launch air strikes on Vietnamese territory. In 1979, the Cambodian F-6 fighters were captured by Vietnamese forces.


A Cambodian F-6 captured by Vietnamese forces is on display at a museum.

In 1965, Albania transferred its existing Soviet MiG-19PM interceptors to China in exchange for the first batch of 12 Chinese F-6 fighters. Between 1965 and 1971, the Albanian Air Force received over 70 single-seat F-6s and two-seat FT-6s. These aircraft formed the backbone of the Albanian fighter force until the mid-1990s, finally being decommissioned in 2005.


An F-6 fighter jet of the Albanian Air Force

After the end of Soviet-Egyptian military-technical cooperation, Cairo lost access to Soviet spare parts for its MiG-19s. To bolster its fighter fleet, Egypt acquired about a hundred F-6 and FT-6 fighters, which served for quite a long time. The single-seat fighters were decommissioned in the mid-1990s, while the twin-seat fighters remained in service until 2000.

In the early 1980s, Egypt transferred 40 aircraft to Iraq. Iran, in turn, acquired over 100 new F-6 and FT-6 aircraft from the manufacturer between 1980 and 1986. These aircraft were decommissioned in both Iraq and Iran in the mid-1990s.

Beginning in 1973, the Sudanese Air Force received twelve F-6 fighters and two FT-6 trainers. An additional twelve F-6s were delivered between 1981 and 1983. Another batch of twelve F-6s and two FT-6s was acquired in 1990. Sudanese F-6s participated in the civil war in the 1980s and 1990s. One F-6 was shot down by rebels in 1988, and two more in the fall of 1991.


An F-6 fighter jet of the Sudanese Air Force. This photo was taken in 2010.

In 2010, photographs were released showing that Sudanese fighters of this type remained operational.

In the second half of the 1970s, 12 F-6 fighters and two FT-6 twin-engine fighters arrived in Tanzania. Chinese specialists helped build Ngerengere Air Base, located approximately 120 kilometers west of Dar es Salaam, the country's administrative and industrial center, to house them.


Google Earth satellite image of F-6 and F-5 fighter jets at Ngerengere Air Base. This image was taken in July 2026.

The Chinese-made aircraft were used during the 1978-1979 war with Uganda and flew sporadically until 2012. These fighters, along with other decommissioned aircraft, are currently stored at Ngerengere Air Base.

The Somali Air Force received its first Chinese-made F-6 fighters in late 1978. Deliveries were made in batches of eight aircraft under a contract for 24 aircraft (including FT-6 trainers) signed by Somali President Siad Barre with China. The aircraft arrived after the active phase of the Ogaden War with Ethiopia had concluded, so the Chinese-made fighters did not have time to participate in that conflict. By 1982, Somalia had received another three dozen F-6s and FT-6s. These aircraft actively carried out airstrikes against Somali National Movement units in the north of the country in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Due to a shortage of qualified pilots in Somalia, Pakistani pilots were recruited to fly the F-6 fighters. In 1988, during fierce fighting in the area of ​​the city of Hargeisa, rebels, using anti-aircraft artillery and MANPADS, shot down at least two F-6s, and by 1990 only three fighters of this type remained in airworthy condition.


A BBC Somali F-6 fighter jet. This photo was taken in the mid-1990s.

By the time Siad Barre was overthrown in January 1991, the Somali Air Force had completely ceased to exist. The remaining F-6 fighters were destroyed in armed clashes between clan factions or abandoned at airbases and turned into scrap metal.

Apparently, the only country that still operates F-6 fighters in combat squadrons is the DPRK.


North Korea became the very first foreign customer for this aircraft, receiving eight units back in 1964. Subsequent large shipments arrived in 1971 (50 units) and 1972 (40 units). There were also at least three dozen two-seat FT-6s, which were delivered until the early 1980s.

On February 25, 1983, North Korean Air Force Captain Lee Un Pyong hijacked an F-6 fighter jet with tail number 529 to South Korea.


A North Korean Air Force F-6 fighter jet hijacked by South Korea

The pilot was on a routine training flight in an F-6 fighter jet, taking off from an airbase near Haeju. During the flight, he abruptly changed course, separated from the formation, and headed south at high speed across the Yellow Sea toward South Korea. On approach to Seoul, the defector's plane was intercepted by South Korean interceptors and escorted until landing at a military airbase south of the capital. The flight lasted approximately 18 minutes. In accordance with the practice of the time for defectors from the DPRK in South Korea, he received a large cash reward (approximately $800,000). The defector was accepted into the ROK Air Force, rose to the rank of colonel, and taught at the South Korean Air Force Academy until his death in 2002.

According to reference data, the North Korean Air Force currently has approximately 90 F-6 and FT-6 fighters. Most of these aircraft are apparently in storage, some in underground shelters. Even though, with Chinese support, the aircraft, which are over 50 years old, have been repeatedly repaired and modernized, and their average annual flight time does not exceed 10 hours, they are close to the end of their service life.


Google Earth satellite image of J-6 fighter jets at Oncheon Air Base. The image was taken in February 2024.

According to satellite imagery, in 2024, approximately two dozen operational J-6 fighters remained only at Oncheon Air Base, to which, according to information published in open sources, the 57th Fighter Regiment of the DPRK Air Force is assigned. At other airfields (for example, at Koksan Air Base), North Korean J-6s have been idle for approximately the past eight years. South Korean sources have reported that, following China's example, some of North Korea's aging fighters could be converted into attack UAVs, but whether this option will actually be realized is unknown.

Продолжение следует ...
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    30 September 2026 05: 41
    In the second half of the 1960s, the Vietnam People's Army Air Force received 25 F-5 fighters, which, according to unconfirmed reports, were flown by pilots from the DPRK.

    There's a detailed article on the BBC, but I can't access it due to blocking, so I'm going by memory. North Korea secretly transferred a regiment's worth of fighter jets to Vietnam. Apparently because Pyongyang didn't have permission to transfer them—the Koreans themselves received them as military aid from the USSR (most likely for free). Hanoi acknowledged this after the war. Since the Vietnamese lacked experienced pilots at the beginning of the war, Pyongyang sent its best pilots to assist them. Two squadrons of North Korean pilots flying MiG-17s and one flying MiG-21s participated in the battles over Vietnam. They shot down several dozen American aircraft, but their main mission was to protect important industrial plants and bridges, as well as the capital of Vietnam itself. The fallen pilots (8-12) were buried in a cemetery near Hanoi. Later, their ashes were returned to North Korea and ceremoniously reburied. However, the Vietnamese preserved the cemetery as a memorial.
    The USSR sent instructors to Vietnam, who trained a sufficient number of Vietnamese fighter pilots. However, the Soviet pilots did not participate in combat. There was only one instance during training, when a fighter carrying a Soviet instructor and a Vietnamese pilot, out of ammunition, was attacked by an American fighter, but managed to escape unharmed.
    1. +4
      30 September 2026 06: 03
      Quote: smart fellow
      There is a detailed article on the BBC, but I can't open it due to blocking.

      The authorities, too, have cut off several sources of information out of cowardice...but WhatsApp and Telegram are still working...as one Decembrist in the film said...They can't even hang someone properly...
  2. +2
    30 September 2026 09: 26
    Rich Soviet legacy, fighter clones.
  3. +2
    30 September 2026 10: 24
    hi
    As always, great article!
    1. +4
      30 September 2026 11: 02
      Hello, Andrey! Thank you for the compliment! The next article in this series will be about the Q-5 attack aircraft and the H-5 and H-6 bombers.
      1. +4
        30 September 2026 11: 08
        Good afternoon!
        The next article in this series will be about the Q-5 attack aircraft and the H-5 and H-6 bombers.

        It's because of your articles. good This site could be called "Military Review" and not "Retelling TV in Your Own Words" or "Daily Hurray".
        1. +3
          30 September 2026 11: 32
          Quote: Wildcat
          It's because of your good articles that this site can be called "Military Review" and not "Retelling TV in Your Own Words" or "Daily Hurray".

          Every reader is looking for something different. I only write about things that interest me.
  4. 0
    30 September 2026 12: 10
    There was information that on experimental MiG-19s, by changing the edges of the air intakes, a speed of 1930 km/h was achieved.
  5. -2
    30 September 2026 13: 40
    The start of the "Cultural Revolution" significantly and for a long time slowed down the development of the aviation industry in China.

    How can you slow down something that didn't exist before the Cultural Revolution? There was no independent aviation industry in China. Independent aviation in China is the brainchild of the Cultural Revolution.
    1. +4
      30 September 2026 14: 44
      Quote: Kostadinov
      How can you slow down something that didn't exist before the Cultural Revolution? There was no independent aviation industry in China. Independent aviation in China is the brainchild of the Cultural Revolution.

      By the time the "Cultural Revolution" began, the aviation industry had already been established with Soviet support. And this assertion of yours is akin to your own stories about the effective firing of 76mm HE shells against tanks at a range of 15 km. wassat
      What kind of strong stuff are you using? Aren't mind-expanding substances illegal in Bulgaria?
  6. 0
    30 September 2026 15: 18
    Thanks for the article! The cover photo appears to be of a plastic model, not another AI exercise, so special thanks for that.
    But.
    In the mid-1950s, PLAAF pilots followed the Soviet-made MiG-15 and MiG-15bis jet fighters with the MiG-17F, which received the local designation J-4 (Jiān-4).

    In mid-1956, assembly of MiG-17F fighters, initially designated Type 56, began at the Shenyang plant. Fifteen assembly kits, along with parts for 10 aircraft, were delivered to China. In addition to the transfer of technical documentation, extensive training was undertaken for Chinese specialists. After full production was established in China, the Chinese equivalent of the MiG-17F received the designation J-5 (Jiān-5), and the VK-1F engine was designated the Wopen-5 (WP-5) in China.

    We noticed a discrepancy in the adjacent paragraphs. The J-4 is similar to the MiG-15, the J-5 is similar to the MiG-17, and everything matches up. wink
    And this is (c) "groveling before the West"(((((((((
    According to authoritative sources (such as the magazines "Aviation and Cosmonautics" and "Technology and Armament") Jiān in our money would be Jiang,
    JJ-5 (Jianjiji Jiaolianji – training fighter) combat training aircraft

    It seems to be Jiangzi Jiaolyangzi (let Sinologists correct me if I'm wrong).
    H-5 (Il-28) and H-6 (Tu-16) bombers... and the Q-5 attack aircraft

    respectively Hong and Ci.
    PL-2 missiles

    PiLi.
    The VK-1F engine was given the name Wopen-5 (WP-5) in China.

    Vupen-5 (again, I could be wrong).
    1. +3
      1 October 2026 13: 52
      Quote: Quzmi4
      We noticed a discrepancy in the adjacent paragraphs. The J-4 is similar to the MiG-15, the J-5 is similar to the MiG-17, and everything matches up.

      In the PLA Air Force, the Soviet MiG-15 (and MiG-15bis) fighter was designated as the J-2.
      Soviet MiG-17Fs were designated J-4, their Chinese-made counterparts were designated J-5.
      1. 0
        5 October 2026 10: 58
        Yes, I screwed up here.
        But the wording in the article is still not the best.
  7. 0
    30 September 2026 15: 23
    In the first photo of a North Korean airfield, four MiG-15s (or Chinese equivalents) are parked at the end of the runway.
    1. +1
      1 October 2026 13: 48
      Quote: Quzmi4
      In the first photo of a North Korean airfield, four MiG-15s (or Chinese equivalents) are parked at the end of the runway.

      How does this contradict what was said in the publication?
      1. 0
        5 October 2026 10: 55
        Where did the idea of ​​a contradiction come from? I just noticed it.
  8. +3
    30 September 2026 16: 47
    I'd like to correct a few minor errors made by the author. The JJ-5 trainer aircraft was decommissioned from the PLAAF on June 12, 2009. The J-6 fighter jets were completely decommissioned from the PLAAF in August 2006. On June 12, 2010, they were officially decommissioned from the PLAAF. This means that for four years, from 2006 to 2010, some J-6s were still used for training purposes, but after 2010, their use ceased completely.

    Incidentally, after their decommissioning, the J-5 continued to be useful in the civilian sector. As in Russia, engines from decommissioned aircraft like the J-5 were used in snowplows.
    1. +3
      1 October 2026 13: 43
      Quote: Seaflanker
      I would like to correct a few minor mistakes made by the author.

      Thank you, but when preparing the publications, I relied on several sources, including Chinese ones, as well as satellite images.
  9. 0
    1 October 2026 10: 54
    By the time the Cultural Revolution began, the aviation industry had already been established with the support of the USSR.

    I fully agree with your assertion that an industry was created that, as you put it, operated "with the support of the USSR" before the Cultural Revolution. But you were talking about an industry that could have operated "without the support of the USSR." Before the Cultural Revolution, there was no such independent industry in China that operated "without the support of the USSR," and it began operating "without the support of the USSR" during the Cultural Revolution.
    And this statement of yours is akin to your own stories about the effective firing of 76-mm HE shells at tanks at a distance of 15 km. wassat

    He probably didn't mention the 15 km range because back then there weren't any 76mm guns that could reach 15 km, but there's a lot of information out there about long-range, horizontally projected high-altitude fire against tanks, not only from 76mm guns but also from mortars, so check it out if you don't know.
    1. +2
      1 October 2026 13: 41
      Quote: Kostadinov
      But we were talking about an industry that could already operate “without the support of the USSR.”

      It could and did work. In any case, combat aircraft were mass-produced until May 16, 1966. Please study history!
      Quote: Kostadinov
      He probably didn't mention the 15 km range because back then there weren't any 76mm guns that could reach 15 km, but there's a lot of information out there about long-range, horizontally projected high-altitude fire against tanks, not only from 76mm guns but also from mortars, so check it out if you don't know.

      Could you please share your unique knowledge and reliable statistics on the mass destruction of tanks by 76mm HE shells and 82mm mortar rounds?
      1. +2
        1 October 2026 16: 14
        No one will provide such statistics.
        And something similar probably happened when firing 75-76,2 mm guns at armored cars, tankettes and light tanks created in the 30s.
        There are also photos of destroyed armored vehicles and light tanks with large holes in the front or side plates of the hull or turret.
        1. +3
          1 October 2026 16: 50
          Alex, welcome!
          Quote: hohol95
          No one will provide such statistics.
          And something similar probably happened when firing 75-76,2 mm guns at armored cars, tankettes and light tanks created in the 30s.

          The point is that this rather extraordinary citizen of sunny Bulgaria claimed in all seriousness that the 76mm HE shells were capable of effectively and massively destroying medium and heavy German tanks at maximum firing range. wassat Which is absurd, to say the least!
          1. +3
            1 October 2026 17: 53
            The 76mm HE shells were capable of effectively and massively destroying medium and heavy German tanks at maximum firing range. 

            If we take the Pz. III models A, B, C, or the Pz. 38(t) models A to some of the D models as medium tanks, a Soviet HE grenade could easily penetrate 15-25 mm of frontal/side armor on these tanks.
            1. +3
              2 October 2026 01: 13
              Alexey, it's clear that a 76mm HE shell hitting a light armored vehicle could very well cause serious damage. But given the ammunition consumption and barrel wear, firing at an unobserved armored target capable of quickly fleeing the area under fire is ineffective. Especially since my counterpart claimed that this method could have been used against all German tanks, including heavy ones.
              1. +3
                2 October 2026 07: 50
                ...firing at an unobserved, armored target capable of quickly fleeing the area under fire is not practical. Especially since my counterpart claimed that this method could have been used against all German tanks, including heavy ones.

                Shooting from closed positions.
                By area.
                I am not an artilleryman at all, but in such cases only large-caliber guns and howitzers would produce a good effect.
                From 122 to 203 mm.
                But I will make a reservation.
                If the enemy is suddenly caught in a certain square and has not dispersed and covered his equipment.
                With good artillery observers and working communications, it was possible to "pick out" one tank at a time from the enemy's defenses, but this would require a large expenditure of ammunition.
                But there were always not enough shells.
                Regimental and divisional three-inch guns, when fired in this manner, were dangerous only for light equipment and enemy manpower.
                1. +2
                  2 October 2026 09: 03
                  Quote: hohol95
                  Shooting from closed positions.
                  By area.

                  That's it! Yes
                  Quote: hohol95
                  I am not an artilleryman at all, but in such cases only large-caliber guns and howitzers would produce a good effect.
                  From 122 to 203 mm.

                  Indeed! Considering that a 76mm grenade weighing approximately 6 kg contained approximately 700 g of explosive, and that its dispersion at a range of 10 km was only a few meters, close-in bursts of 3-inch shells could only scratch the armor with shrapnel, and the unlikely direct hit was no guarantee of disabling a medium or heavy tank.
                  Quote: hohol95
                  With good artillery observers and working communications, it was possible to "pick out" one tank at a time from the enemy's defenses, but this would require a large expenditure of ammunition.
                  But there were always not enough shells.
                  Regimental and divisional three-inch guns, when fired in this manner, were dangerous only for light equipment and enemy manpower.

                  I completely agree! One way or another, firing 76mm divisional guns at tanks from indirect positions was not justified!
                  1. +2
                    2 October 2026 11: 14
                    Three-inch guns and mortars could be used to fire at advancing tanks and motorized infantry to cut off the latter from the tanks.
                    That's exactly it.
                    And then direct fire and armor-piercing shells...
                    It seems that in "Son of the Regiment" there is an episode of shooting from a closed position at an attacking enemy.
                    1. +2
                      2 October 2026 11: 28
                      Quote: hohol95
                      Three-inch guns and mortars could be used to fire at advancing tanks and motorized infantry to cut off the latter from the tanks.
                      That's exactly it.

                      Yes sir! Yes
                      Quote: hohol95
                      And then direct fire and armor-piercing shells...
                      Yes
                      Quote: hohol95
                      It seems that in "Son of the Regiment" there is an episode of shooting from a closed position at an attacking enemy.

                      It's a work of fiction, but Valentin Kataev, unlike some modern commentators, understood what he was talking about!
  10. +2
    1 October 2026 15: 10
    Most interesting article, more please.
  11. 0
    1 October 2026 17: 12
    Quote: Bongo
    In any case, combat aircraft were mass-produced until May 16, 1966. Please study history!

    I researched and found this: Serial production of the first combat aircraft of China's own Q-5 design began in December 1969.
    Could you please share your unique knowledge and reliable statistics on the mass destruction of tanks by 76mm HE shells and 82mm mortar rounds?

    I can share the standard fire rates for 76mm shells and 82mm and 120mm mortars for suppressing and destroying tanks in the staging area at the appropriate range. This is in all artillery textbooks.
    1. +1
      2 October 2026 01: 21
      Quote: Kostadinov
      I researched and found this. Serial production of the first combat aircraft of China's own Q-5 design began in December 1969.

      I'm happy for you. You may not have noticed, but this post is about fighter jets. J-5 and J-6, mass production of which began before Comrade Mao's official proclamation of the "Cultural Revolution"And what does the Q-5 attack aircraft have to do with it?
      Quote: Kostadinov
      I can share the standard consumption rates of 76 mm shells and 82 and 120 mm mines for suppressing and destroying tanks in the concentration area at the appropriate distance.

      That would be interesting! Yes But you're trying to steer the conversation in another direction. In the past, you've stated that 76 mm OFS They were effective against all German heavy tanks, including at maximum firing range. Could you please share actual data on these firings, including the number of tanks destroyed and the ammunition consumed, as well as how the firing was adjusted?
  12. -1
    2 October 2026 10: 37
    You may not have noticed, but this publication is about the J-5 and J-6 fighters, whose mass production began before Comrade Mao officially declared the "Cultural Revolution." So what does the Q-5 attack aircraft have to do with it?

    Perhaps some of you didn't notice that I commented solely on the assertion in this publication that "the onset of the Cultural Revolution significantly and permanently slowed the development of China's aviation industry." I responded to this and pointed out that this "slowdown" not only didn't stop the production of copies of Soviet aircraft, but also didn't prevent the testing and commencement of serial production of the first original Chinese combat aircraft design.
    In the past, you claimed that the 76mm HE shell was an effective weapon against all German heavy tanks, including at maximum firing range.

    Read again. Long-range indirect fire from a 76mm cannon or self-propelled gun can destroy stationary German T-5 Panther heavy tanks (in an offensive staging area or in defensive positions) at long range, given the appropriate ammunition consumption. Here's everything I wrote about it.
    1. +3
      2 October 2026 11: 04
      Quote: Kostadinov
      Maybe some of you didn't notice that I made a comment.

      Blah...blah...blah... it's very funny when a grown man, having written obvious stupidity, starts to dodge and make excuses. lol
    2. +2
      2 October 2026 11: 25
      Quote: Kostadinov
      And if you don’t want my comments, I won’t write any more comments on your publications.

      You wrote this, right? Or have you already forgotten?
      Please spare my publications from your delusional comments! am