Project Delta, or a billion for Magirus-Deutz

17 087 67
Project Delta, or a billion for Magirus-Deutz


Difficult situation


The late 70s and 60s marked the beginning of large-scale socialist construction projects. Western Siberia's oil and gas provinces were being developed, and the Baikal-Amur Mainline was being built. Paradoxically, the country lacked the equipment adequate for the task. And the tasks were challenging. In Siberia and the Far East, drilling had to be done, digging through permafrost, and hauling pipes—all without paved roads and in severe frosts. The Soviet Union didn't have a particularly extensive selection of equipment for extreme conditions. Kremenchug produced the KrAZ-256BS dump trucks and KrAZ-257S flatbed trucks. The "C" in the index denoted a northern version, and the vehicle was indeed noticeably warmer. These KrAZs were said to be rated for temperatures down to -60°C.оS. But the inherent design flaws haven't disappeared.




The steering was extremely heavy, the wooden cabin was downright uncomfortable, and the diesel's liquid cooling system required draining the water after each use. Antifreeze was only a rumor back then, but even its presence wouldn't have saved the situation. The quality of rubber seals, hoses, and gaskets in domestic vehicles was poor. The fluid ethylene glycol solution quickly found the slightest crack and simply leaked onto the ground. It was easier and cheaper for drivers to continue using free water daily. In short, the Kremenchug trucks of that time (and all other Soviet trucks) were vehicles for the strong of spirit and body. There was also the MAZ-500S, which participated in the development of Samotlor alongside the KrAZ trucks.


The heavy league featured four-axle MAZ-543s, used for towing anything that lighter vehicles couldn't handle. But the eight-wheeled truck was a military machine with a less-than-stellar lifespan (the engine was tank) and military ergonomics. To solve these problems, West German FAUN tractors and pipe carriers had to be purchased – 254 of these gigantic vehicles arrived in the country from the late 70s to 1989.




FAUN HS in Western Siberia

A typical Soviet KrAZ truck could only haul one heavy, large-diameter pipe, but the German FAUN HS, thanks to its enormous strength and size, could handle two such pipes, each 12 meters long, and transport them across completely impassable terrain directly to the laying site. The difference, as they say, was obvious. And FAUN was far from the only company supplying equipment for the development of the Soviet Union's riches. However, this is a slightly different matter. story.

The main culprit of the celebration for many years was the Baikal-Amur Mainline, built north of the Trans-Siberian Railway under truly extreme conditions. Fortunately, the Soviet leadership was well aware of the situation even before construction began in 1974. It was decided to purchase a large batch of rugged trucks (primarily dump trucks) abroad. Even if the domestic industry could offer a vehicle of the appropriate class and quality (which it did not), production capacity was insufficient to produce many trucks in a short period of time. This was one of the customer's primary requirements. As it turned out, only a relatively unknown company, Magirus-Deutz, could satisfy the customer.

Project Delta


The early 1970s were a period of détente. The Soviet Union sought to squeeze maximum benefit from this situation. Moreover, West German Chancellor Willy Brandt was pursuing a rapprochement with the USSR. It was during this time that Moscow signed a series of ambitious contracts with the West: the purchase of a Fiat plant for the construction of AvtoVAZ, a gas-to-pipeline agreement with West Germany, and the involvement of Western firms in the construction of KamAZ.

However, the choice of Magirus-Deutz as the main BAM truck was far from obvious at the time. The Czechoslovakian Tatra was clearly no worse and posed serious competition to the German vehicle. The plant's socialist origins and strong brand recognition in the USSR were also factors in its favor. The Tatra 148 was best suited for the conditions of the Far East, featuring, like the Magirus, an efficient air-cooled diesel engine. This was one of the key conditions of the contract – drivers wouldn't have to drain and refill the engine's cooling jacket every night and morning. The Tatra, with its famous backbone frame, was theoretically superior to the Magirus in terms of off-road capability and smoother ride. While a loaded, leaf-sprung Magirus would slip due to its diagonal axle suspension, the Tatra 148 continued to "plow" with all wheels, literally licking the terrain.






The Tatra 148 was popular in the USSR

But there were also shortcomings, clearly evident in comparison with the German machine. With 290 hp compared to the Czech 212 hp, the Magirus was the absolute king of long climbs and tough quarries. In the BAM mountains, in deep open-cast mines, and when towing trailers, the Magirus barely noticed the weight, while the Tatra 148 pushed its limits on steep slopes.

The Magirus's classic axles and straight, rigid, longitudinal frame were familiar to any Soviet mechanic. The Tatra's chassis, with its complex configuration of swinging half-shafts and torsion bars, required highly skilled mechanics. Furthermore, the Czech vehicle's rubber half-shaft boots were prone to cracking in Siberian frosts, allowing dirt to enter the transmission. But the main reason for choosing the Magirus was its volume and speed of production—the USSR was expected to receive just over 10 trucks within two years as part of Project Delta. Tatra was overwhelmed with contracts, and there was simply no spare capacity for production expansion.

For reference: the USSR didn't abandon the Tatra 148, and over the course of their cooperation, they purchased more than 26 trucks. Only on the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM) were they ever seen. The remaining competitors—the Japanese and Germans from Mercedes-Benz—were eliminated due to the lack of an air-cooled diesel engine in their lineup. Furthermore, Magirus-Deutz was, to put it mildly, in a precarious financial position before signing the contract with the Soviet Union. Its parent company, Klockner-Humboldt-Deutz AG (KHD), was suffering massive losses due to declining demand in the European truck market and the completion of major defense contracts for the Bundeswehr. The German manufacturer desperately needed cash to fill its empty production lines in Ulm, so it made extreme price concessions and tight delivery deadlines in order to win the Soviet tender against its more advantaged competitors.

The critical situation led KHD's management to completely divest its automotive business, selling it to Italy's Fiat. Just three months after signing the deal with the USSR, on January 1, 1975, Magirus-Deutz officially became part of the newly formed IVECO concern. The Soviet order, worth 1,1 billion marks, became a lifeline for the failing plant—it immediately provided 70% of the plant's export capacity and provided significant start-up capital for the brand's development under the IVECO umbrella.


Magirus-Deutz goes to BAM

When the Delta contract was signed in 1974, the average price of a single Deutz F4L514 truck for the Soviet Union was approximately 110,000–125,000 German marks (converted at the official exchange rate of the State Bank of the USSR at the time—approximately 33,000–38,000 rubles per vehicle). Since the Soviet side was purchasing not just one model but an entire line of vehicles, the exact price depended on the model: two-axle Magirus 232 D 19 trucks were cheaper, while the powerful three-axle Magirus 290 D 26 dump trucks were more expensive.

To understand the true scale of this cost in 1974, it can be compared with prices of the time. One German Magirus cost the Soviet budget approximately four times more than the flagship domestic dump truck, the KrAZ-256B. If we go further and translate this cost into 2026 realities, the average price of a dump truck would be approximately 200,000 euros (approximately 19,2 million rubles), which is very close to the price of a new, modern, heavy-duty construction dump truck from a European brand in a top-of-the-line configuration.




The Italian company IVECO shipped its last truck for the USSR from its Ulm-Donautal plant on November 19, 1976. In addition to the main contract, spare parts worth an additional 200 million marks were ordered in 1981–1982.

Diesel, born under Hitler


The most interesting exhibit at Magirus-Deutz was its air-cooled diesel engine. It wasn't just its forced-air design, but the development history behind it. The engine's roots go back to the four-cylinder Deutz F4L514, producing 65 hp. The Germans built it in 1944 specifically for the war with the USSR. The Wehrmacht suffered greatly from water freezing in radiators in the harsh Russian winters, and the new jacketless engine proved the perfect solution. Only 674 of these units were produced by the end of the war, but the concept had proven its viability. The engine became the basis for the Klöckner-Humboldt-Deutz modular concept, whereby two cylinders could be added to four cylinders as needed.

By the early 1970s, Deutz had developed its most advanced and iconic diesel engine family—the Deutz FL 413. It was with these engines that Magirus-Deutz trucks were delivered en masse to the USSR under the Delta contract in 1975. The letters in the index were deciphered simply: F—for automotive (Fahrzeug), L—for air-cooled (Luftgekühlt), the number 4 denoted the fourth generation, and 13—the piston stroke in centimeters. Two-axle Magirus trucks were equipped with the F8L413 V8, producing 232 hp. Heavy three-axle dump trucks were equipped with the F10L413, a 10-cylinder, 290 hp giant. Cooling was provided by a giant axial fan, driven by a fluid coupling. The airflow intensity was regulated automatically: the hotter the engine became, the faster the turbine spun.


The Kostanay Motor Plant was supposed to produce licensed copies of the Magirus engine. But it didn't work out. It's now the Kostanay Diesel Plant of JSC AgromashHolding.

In 1982, the Soviet Union purchased a license for the engine and attempted to launch its production. A factory was even built in Kostanay for this purpose, but extensive preparations were made beforehand. As early as 1970, NAMI organized a test run of Ural-375 army trucks, secretly equipped with German Deutz F8L413 engines (the same ones that would later power the Magirus). The results astonished the military and engineers. It was decided to localize the German Deutz FL 413 engine family. The Soviet copy was designated the Ural-744. It was to be a V8 air-cooled diesel engine producing 234 hp, intended for the complete "dieselization" of the Ural Automobile Plant and LiAZ buses.

In December 1979, the USSR leadership issued an official decree authorizing the construction of this industrial giant. By 1980, an administrative directorate had been established in the Kazakh SSR, and by 1982, full-scale work was underway at the construction site. The new enterprise project was conceived as cyclopean in scale and technological complexity, as its primary objective was to completely free the Soviet truck industry from dependence on imports.

To ensure that the domestic equivalent of the German "air-powered" engine would match the original in reliability, the Soviet Union spared no expense. Petrodollars were used to purchase 23 automated production lines from West Germany. The production of the complex ribbed cylinders and heads, which required pinpoint precision and the use of cold-resistant cast iron, was entrusted to foreign technology: a state-of-the-art automated foundry complex from Japan and Italy was purchased for the workshops. The capacity of this industrial colossus was impressive—the first stage alone was expected to produce 20,000 Ural-744 engines annually, powering thousands of Soviet trucks and buses.


Deutz FL 413

However, the overall results of testing the first localized engines revealed critical reliability issues with the localized components, preventing the Soviet Deutz equivalent from becoming a full-fledged replacement for the Yaroslavl liquid-cooled engines. Due to the inconsistent quality of Soviet castings, the ribbed cylinder walls and pistons of domestic production had microscopic defects that led to localized overheating, increased engine oil consumption, and rapid burnout of the piston assembly under high loads in quarries.

The precision hydraulic clutch of the cooling fan drive proved a particular headache for engineers during testing: Soviet-era rubber components couldn't withstand extreme temperature fluctuations and deformed, causing oil to leak from the clutch, the fan to stop, and the engine to seize instantly. As a result, despite successfully overcoming the harsh Siberian climate, the Ural-744 demonstrated a service life before overhaul that was several times shorter than that of the original German FL 413 series prototypes, requiring the factory to make endless design modifications right up until the project's demise.


The USSR failed to localize the assembly of German diesel engines.

But let's return to Magirus-Deutz at the Baikal-Amur Mainline. To ensure full driver training, the Germans took over their training at the factory center in Ulm. The internship period was initially four weeks, later reduced to two. The trained instructors then traveled to the transport companies and mechanized columns that were to receive German equipment. In total, approximately 50,000 drivers and mechanics have passed through this system.

Being a Magirus driver was considered fortunate—and simultaneously generated a certain amount of class discord. Writer Yuri Nagibin described this situation in his short story "Vasya, Can You Feel It?":

These guys, first-class drivers, by the way, worked only for Magirus, knocked out up to six hundred a month, never helped anyone and did not seek help from others, kept themselves in a contemptuous and proud alienation within their narrow circle.

However, reality was more complex than literary images. The story of mechanized column No. 91 of the Bamstroymekhanizatsiya trust confirms this. A team of 120 drivers was dumping rock near Tynda. Nikolai Dmitrievich Talikin was their supervisor. They worked from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., loading trucks beyond their rated capacity. Three out of four dropped out—not all could handle the load. But it was this column that earned the right to dump the "golden" 25 millionth cubic meter of soil. The foreman was awarded a tourist trip to Japan—he passed the trip on to the team's best driver, Viktor Kozlovsky.

The Magirus trucks were originally intended for the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM), but in reality, about a third of the vehicles were redeployed to other northern regions: the oil and gas fields of Siberia, the mines of the Kola Peninsula (Khibiny), and northern Kazakhstan. Wherever reliable equipment for extreme conditions was needed.

A variety of equipment was mounted on the Magirus chassis: Stetter concrete mixers and concrete pumps, Orenstein & Koppel excavator workshops, tractor units with semi-trailers, pipe trucks, municipal road vehicles and even... garbage trucks.

A little-known chapter in history is the use of German trucks by Soviet military railway workers. Construction of the eastern wing of the Baikal-Amur Mainline—from Tynda to Komsomolsk-on-Amur—was entrusted to the Main Directorate of Railway Troops. Between 1974 and 1989, two railway corps laid approximately 1600 km of main track—roughly a third of the entire length of the line. They worked, among other things, on Magirus trucks, which, strictly speaking, violated the restrictions of the Coordinating Committee for Export Controls (COCOM), which prohibited the supply of equipment to the USSR that could be used for military purposes.


A true testament to the legendary dump truck was the monument unveiled on July 6, 2024, in the village of Nizhneangarsk in Buryatia. The unveiling was timed to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the construction of the Baikal-Amur Mainline, and this is a truly unique event – ​​monuments to foreign technology are extremely rare in Russia. Besides the Magirus-Deutz, there is a Tatra-111 obelisk in the Magadan Region and several memorials around the country, including a Lend-Lease Studebaker US6. A worthy monument, indeed.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 23
    24 September 2026 05: 11
    Thanks to the author for publishing!
    As a BAM builder, it was a pleasure for me to read and remember my wild youth!
    No, I'm not a driver, but I know Magirus trucks firsthand. Excellent technology. And the Magirus was also famous for its heater! No matter the frost, the cabin was warm and cozy. So warm, in fact, that you could work in just a shirt!
    Thanks again!
    Nostalgia.... good
    1. +7
      24 September 2026 07: 52
      The legendary Magirus... when I first saw it as a kid, I was amazed by the color and the glass cabin. It's a shame I never got to ride it, but I did get to ride the Tatra 148. And how the shift workers praised the Magirus!
    2. +2
      24 September 2026 08: 20
      Good morning .
      I would like to add a little about ethylene glycol.
      This mixture found every leak in freezing temperatures, and if the engine was warm, there weren't any leaks. And yes, water and antifreeze transfer heat better than glycol.
      I had to work with glycol for many years, switching to water in the summer. In winter, the working conditions were such that I had to be constantly ready to go out. And heating and adding water takes time.
    3. +4
      24 September 2026 08: 34
      They've been building a second line of the Trans-Siberian Railway for years now, I think. But the media is silent.
      1. +3
        24 September 2026 14: 16
        Quote: Novosibirsk
        They've been building a second line of the Trans-Siberian Railway for years now, I think. But the media is silent.

        They're building it; in some places, the double-track has been there for a long time. They even wanted to electrify it. True, for now the wires run from Khabarovsk to Komsomolsk, and they've extended them to Sovgavan. There are no wires running toward the Baikal-Amur Mainline. Two weeks ago, I drove toward Berezovoye. Compared to last year, the work has slowed down considerably.
        1. +3
          24 September 2026 14: 54
          Quote: Fitter65
          They even wanted to electrify it.

          From Lena to Taksimo it was immediately electrified.
          But that was 20 years ago! Maybe they've extended the overhead line further toward Tynda now, I don't know.
          1. +1
            24 September 2026 16: 57
            From Lena to Taksimo, electrification was already in place by 1989. There is no electrification beyond that.
        2. +1
          24 September 2026 16: 56
          The Volochayevka-Komsomolsk-Sov. Gavan line is being electrified, and that's all for now. This week, the first 162 km from Volochayevka were connected to the power grid, and the work will be completed by the end of 2027.
        3. +1
          25 September 2026 08: 14
          I see. Beautiful places, I guess.
      2. +1
        24 September 2026 16: 53
        There is not a second line, but a second track on the Ulak - Elga section.
    4. +4
      25 September 2026 15: 04
      Thank you for the high rating! We're currently working on a story about Faun and Kenworth in Samotlor.
      1. +2
        25 September 2026 15: 59
        Well, there were fauna on the Baikal-Amur Mainline too. I'm familiar with them too.
        Let me explain. I had a motorcade right next to where I lived. I knew everyone without exception, and I had friends in the motorcade, even though I never worked there.
        True, the eldest son decided to skip school and start earning money straight away, joining the motorcade. But that happened much later.
        There was a lot of imported equipment on the BAM, and all of it showed its best side!
        P.S. When the docking was being prepared, at our Kuanda station, on the site of the future museum, they placed domestic equipment with approximately the same slogan.
        "This technology is building BAM!"
        That was a laugh...
        Some higher-up ordered everything to be put away before the celebrations, so that, God forbid, it wouldn’t fall into the hands of journalists! laughing
  2. +8
    24 September 2026 05: 51
    Thanks to the author! What a fantastic series about automotive technology!
    I first encountered the Magirus (in its crew-hauling version) in 1994 in Khibiny, in the city of Kirovsk. We went there for practical training, and they took us to industrial sites. There, the Magirus became something of a household name.
    PS: My beloved Leningrad is instantly and always recognizable in photographs (photo with "Tatrochka").
    1. 0
      24 September 2026 23: 53
      You went for a practical training session. It's a good car. But! The cabin is nice, but the "kung" is not so good. On a tree. And if you also have to use additional practical training...
      1. +2
        25 September 2026 01: 40
        Well, we didn't travel very far there, and we were in such a state that we didn't really care about comfort ))).
        1. +3
          26 September 2026 13: 09
          I went there for the first time in 1984, when I was at school during Operation Dnepr-2. I remember the Magirus and the lunch in the village of Oktyabrsky with potatoes and stew. hi
  3. + 10
    24 September 2026 06: 36
    When foreigners touch our auto industry, something worthwhile comes out, like a handmade wooden cabin for a Kraz.
    Are Russian car industry locations cursed?
    Here's an example with an engine - they bought it ALL(!!!!) for their production and feel request request request - there's no way to describe it properly
    1. +1
      24 September 2026 08: 36
      The Americans also tried to make catapults for fighter jets using technology they bought from us, but they failed. They started buying again.
    2. +2
      24 September 2026 10: 45
      Quote: your1970
      Here's an example with the engine - they bought EVERYTHING(!!!!) for their production

      Which engine are you talking about? Did you buy everything? ))) Everything for assembly... maybe... But the components came from other factories.
      Below, they write about the same rubber products. But these same rubber factories don't produce their own rubber. Strings are also produced by third-party suppliers.
      When did AvtoVAZ even launch? And high-frequency current hardening of camshafts only became a thing in the early 80s. Back then, camshafts were consumables.
  4. +7
    24 September 2026 06: 52
    The failure to improve engine quality is, of course, a major downside. Such engines wouldn't only be suitable for Ural and LiAZ trucks. They could also have been suitable for ZIL-131 and 133 trucks, KamAZ, and MAZ trucks. Maybe they built the plant in the wrong place?
    1. +4
      24 September 2026 08: 19
      The failure to improve engine quality is, of course, a major downside. Such engines wouldn't only be suitable for Ural and LiAZ trucks. They could also have been suitable for ZIL-131 and 133 trucks, KamAZ, and MAZ trucks. Maybe they built the plant in the wrong place?

      In the mid-80s, I was at some conference where production and science professionals were speaking, and someone from Rostov started talking about the problems with producing combines, which were copied from either Klaas or someone else. The gist of it was that the rubber products our industry was producing didn't meet the durability and reliability requirements for the units and the machine as a whole...so this problem was widespread throughout the country.
      One of the conclusions sounded something like this: to appeal to the USSR Council of Ministers to acquire rubber production technologies for all newly designed equipment in the USSR, since without this, the established reliability and durability indicators would not be achieved...
      P.S. Every driver leaving on a trip was forced to take with them the engine belts, at a minimum...
      1. +4
        24 September 2026 09: 18
        They used a lot of belts. Incidentally, fishermen used them for nets. And there was plenty of this stuff around the fields. They even used it on felt boots. I'm talking about harvester belts.
    2. 0
      28 September 2026 21: 14
      Quote: pin_code
      Maybe they built a factory there??

      Yeah, just like in the joke "cursed place"! )))
      But seriously, I just can't understand why we can make one or two, but it's just not our thing for the masses. The Buran has gone rogue and landed on automatic, but they still haven't perfected the Niva. It whines, and the hood catches on the windshield wipers.
      1. +1
        29 September 2026 11: 45
        The Buran didn't have windshield wipers, so we didn't even touch the hood.
  5. +4
    24 September 2026 07: 01
    One German Magirus cost the Soviet budget approximately 4 times more expensive, than the flagship domestic dump truck KrAZ-256B.

    That's the point. The KrAZ might have been just as good as the Magirus, but no one would have allowed it to be built for that kind of money.
    1. +7
      24 September 2026 08: 24
      KrAZ might have turned out to be no worse than Magirus, but no one would have allowed it to be built for that kind of money.

      Today, we are forced to evaluate everything using "money"...
      And then, there was the issue of our industry lagging behind, and Magirus, Zhiguli, the first stage of KAMAZ - these were all steps taken by the government aimed at overcoming this lagging behind...
      and therefore KrAZ could not suddenly become Magirus out of nowhere...
      There was a saying at the time about the VAZ-2107: "I want to become a Mercedes..."
      1. +2
        24 September 2026 08: 39
        Quote: Dedok
        At that time, the question arose about the lagging behind of our industry

        These are the costs of a planned economy. In some places we lagged, and in others we were ahead of the curve. Buying (something) from the West was the shortest and easiest way.

        Quote: Dedok
        KrAZ couldn't suddenly become Magirus from scratch...

        And what about the Skoda? The Skoda was comparable to the Magirus. And that's quite an achievement of the socialist camp.
        1. +3
          24 September 2026 08: 41
          And what about Skoda? Skoda was comparable to Magirus.

          Are you talking about 706 Skoda?
          but the article is about Tatra..
          and Magirus...
          1. +1
            24 September 2026 08: 42
            Quote: Dedok
            The article is about Tatra.

            Got it mixed up. I meant Tatra.
            1. +6
              24 September 2026 09: 04
              Tatra was quite a brand even before it fell into the socialist camp.
    2. +1
      24 September 2026 08: 37
      That too. We'd love to have some German money then.
    3. +2
      24 September 2026 18: 11
      I did a little googling. In the 1970s, our KrAZ dump truck was sold in England—about 500 units were sold at a price of 8250 pounds. I couldn't find a direct exchange rate for the mark to the pound back then. I converted it into dollars. The price in 1975 marks came out to be about 40,000.
  6. +1
    24 September 2026 07: 36
    Very interesting!
    But you feel ashamed for our cars. Even if they gave us everything they could, nothing worked, and still doesn't work. They're pouring a lot of money into the auto industry, but it's no use. What's wrong?
    1. + 10
      24 September 2026 09: 41
      Quote: Vadim S
      But you feel ashamed for our cars. Even if they gave us everything they could, nothing worked, and still doesn't work. They're pouring a lot of money into the auto industry, but it's no use. What's wrong?

      We need a large number of skilled workers, we need advanced science and technology, we need world-class industry, and we need decades of hard work and colossal resources. And yet, in the late 30s, we only achieved our first sensible industrialization... And then came the brutal war, and half the inhabited territory lay in ruins. There simply wasn't enough time or resources for everything.
      Nevertheless, how much we managed to do!
    2. 0
      24 September 2026 10: 47
      Quote: Vadim S
      But you feel ashamed of our cars.

      Do you make anything yourself? I bet the Japanese and Americans are lining up for it?
  7. -1
    24 September 2026 08: 21
    Project Delta, or a billion for Magirus-Deutz

    The emergence of Magirus gave impetus to the entire auto industry, and when the author mentions the emergence of AvtoVAZ, he, unfortunately, doesn't list the technologies that were transferred to us along with Fiat...
  8. -1
    24 September 2026 08: 32
    But there were also some shortcomings, which became clear when compared to the German machine. Its 290 hp output, compared to the Czech machine's 212 hp, made the Magirus the absolute king of long climbs and tough quarries.

    Well, how many times can we repeat/say that power has no effect on overcoming "long climbs"... unless you're trying to conquer the "pull" with a long run-up... - but this doesn't apply to trucks!
    1. +2
      24 September 2026 08: 41
      My dad drove a ZIL, new at the time, probably from '93. They had a Kamaz engine installed, among other things. It went uphill like it was on the flats. Probably due to the combination of lightness and power. It's a shame they folded the factory. It was a good car. Comfortable. Heated mirrors.
  9. +4
    24 September 2026 08: 39
    The main thing is an air-cooled diesel engine to get rid of coolant, like in Kraz and MAZ trucks.
    This means that the Soviet government made the right choice by ordering German trucks for the harsh taiga of Siberia.
  10. +2
    24 September 2026 08: 40
    Most for the conditions of the Far East The Tatra 148 was suitable, which, like the Magirus, had an economical air-cooled diesel engine.

    What kind of "pearl" is this?
    What is the "Far East"?
    For me it's Vladivostok - look at the average temperature in January!
    and the construction was carried out in the conditions of the Permafrost!
    and Magirus, unlike Tatra, had a design solution - Preparation of the engine and transmission for daily use: 3 (three) autonomous heaters!
    and this is in addition to the air-cooled diesel engine...
    The driver of the Magirus can get into the cabin in the morning in his shirt! Unlike the Tatra, and especially the "leaky" KrAZ
    1. +4
      24 September 2026 18: 12
      In Tatra there was also a Czech autonomous diesel fuel heater, it was roasting like crazy, by the way, there were also Russian ones, but the quality of components was completely different, for example, glow plugs for these heaters were in huge shortage... In general, the wild incompetence of the leaders, up to now, by the way, a small story from the modern life, the general director and owner of a new machine-building enterprise in the field of marine engineering, the task was: I bought a lathe, put it into operation, it was already six months, we install it, connect it, refuel it, run it in and ... we bring the bill for the tool, the bare minimum, measuring, machining and then the question: what is this!??? The answer: you need to buy a minimum set of measuring and machining tools and equipment for it, to which a wild scream: what are you trying to foist on me, I BOUGHT YOU A MACHINE..!!! What else did I buy to work with, except a Chinese tape measure for a lathe (hahaha)? That's the responsibility of the plant's manager and owner, who, by the way, worked in the industry as an engineer. And besides, his own pocket is closer now than later. That's how production managers work...
      1. 0
        24 September 2026 18: 53
        In Tatra there was also a Czech autonomous region on the DT,

        and I wrote:
        3(three) autonomous heaters!

        1. engine and gearbox;
        2 driver's cabin;
        3. Insulated battery box...
  11. +5
    24 September 2026 08: 51
    Quote: pin_code
    The failure to improve engine quality is, of course, a major downside. Such engines wouldn't only be suitable for Ural and LiAZ trucks. They could also have been suitable for ZIL-131 and 133 trucks, KamAZ, and MAZ trucks. Maybe they built the plant in the wrong place?


    And this is the classic "role of personality in history."
    When choosing a location for the new plant, the main candidates were Ufa and Kostanay.
    But the Ufa residents were lukewarm about the idea, especially since auto engines had always been a sideline for them. Meanwhile, the Kazakh party members were vigorously engaged, even though it was clear to everyone that the plant would then be built from scratch in a bare field, and engineering and technical workers would have to be lured from all over with all sorts of incentives.
    As a result, IMHO, the failure of engine production was connected not only and not so much with crappy gaskets, but primarily with the fact that there was simply no one to work on the conveyor; all engine production before 1991 was limited to experimental design products.
  12. +1
    24 September 2026 09: 00
    The fluid ethylene glycol composition quickly found the smallest crack and simply flowed out onto the ground. It was easier and cheaper for drivers continue to use free water daily.

    At that time, there were no factories producing antifreeze in sufficient quantities...
    The rubber components weren't designed for antifreeze: if someone added antifreeze, it would start leaking out of the newly installed NEW pump (water cooling pump).
    and the driver did not HAVE the opportunity to use antifreeze...
    1. 0
      24 September 2026 18: 33
      Grandpa, don't talk nonsense. In our Central Asian region, we used antifreeze in the winter. This was in the 1980s. VAZ and KAMAZ were already in operation, where antifreeze was added from the factory. The rest, that is, the national economy, simply didn't have enough of it, to increase capacity. Well, I don't know what prevented this. Of course, the lubricating properties of water and special antifreezes are different. Therefore, the wear and tear caused by operating on water, in the absence of an opportunity to add antifreeze, usually led to its leakage from the cooling system. The valves did not hold due to the quality of the parts and seals. The BTR 60 PB with a GAZ 51 engine digested our antifreeze just fine, as did the Kraz 255, Ural and ZIL trucks. KAMAZ came with it from the factory. Tosol, a brand of antifreeze with a package of original additives, our industry produced poison and mostly without additives, which is why there was corrosion of the block and heads and brass on the radiators. It's just that our science hasn't produced a complex of inhibitor additives for various materials, and buying abroad was a chore, and the commissars asked, "Why do you need antifreeze when you have water, and so much for so many things?"
      1. 0
        24 September 2026 19: 03
        Grandpa, don't talk nonsense, in our Soviet Union, equipment was operated using antifreeze during the winter, eh?By 1980, VAZ and KAMAZ were already in operation., where antifreeze was poured in from the factory,

        And when did they start building BAM? - in 80?
        Where on the BAM were KAMAZ and VAZ used?
        BTR-60 PB with a GAZ-51 engine, our antifreeze and Kraz 255 and Urals and Zils were digested normally, KAMAZ came with it from the factory,

        The army had "water-oil heaters" - there was no need for antifreeze...
        Tosol, a brand of antifreeze with a package of original additives, our industry produced poison and mostly without additives, which is why there was corrosion of the block and heads and brass on the radiators,

        Well, yes, as my grandmother used to say, "I'll take someone else's troubles away with my hand": and what is materials science, do you know?
        And in order to pour antifreeze into the engine, you need to recycle all the materials in the cooling jacket - did you know about this?
        where do you come from?
  13. +7
    24 September 2026 09: 15
    To this day, we still come across living Magiruses on the roads of Yakutia.
  14. +2
    24 September 2026 10: 37
    Quote: Aggle
    I first encountered the Magirus (in its shift version) in 1994 in Khibiny, in the city of Kirovsk. We went there for practical training, and they took us to industrial sites. There, the Magirus became something of a household name.

    Here in Khibiny, they appeared as early as the 70s. Incidentally, if I remember correctly the numbers on the hood grille read 170, they were equipped with 170-horsepower engines. Yes, here in Khibiny, the Magirus era at the Apatit plant was a landmark, a legendary time. Incidentally, the vehicles that arrived with the next batch, now branded IVECA, were of inferior quality, according to rumors that have persisted among the driver community to this day. They were soon abandoned, replaced by crew buses based on Ural trucks, and later, KAMAZ trucks.
  15. +3
    24 September 2026 10: 38
    It's actually surprising that TATRA didn't localize their truck production in the USSR. They later developed more powerful engines, and in any case, they were plentiful throughout the USSR. And, unlike the Magirus, the chassis could be configured in any configuration: 4x4, 6x6, 8x8, or 10x10.
    And with the same Diesels, it would be possible to do projects in parallel.
  16. +4
    24 September 2026 12: 53
    "Western Siberian provinces" - which provinces were in the Soviet Union? belay How can you write articles like this?
  17. +8
    24 September 2026 13: 33
    Quote: Dmitriy356
    "Western Siberian provinces" - which provinces were in the Soviet Union? belay How can you write articles like this?

    Let me choke you a little. hi
    The provinces of Western Siberia are a geographic and geological terminology. For example, the landscape zones and provinces of Western Siberia are defined as follows:
    The tundra zone is represented by the Yamal, Taz, and Gydan provinces. The forest-tundra zone of Western Siberia is represented by the Lower Ob, Nadym-Pur, and Yenisei-Taz provinces. There are also forest-swamp, forest-steppe, and steppe zones with provinces...
    Here is a map from the Soviet era, with the dotted lines marking the borders of such provinces.
  18. +1
    24 September 2026 17: 24
    The 60s, and especially the 70s, gave the USSR many impetuses. The author mentioned the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM), AvtoVAZ, Kamaz, the gas-to-pipeline deal, and also:
    Pepsi-Cola license
    She's on Marlborough.
    Adidas sneaker release
    Turbines of different classes
    MAZ's jerk
    Olympics-80
    Color television
    Etc.
    All with the participation of Western countries. It's unclear where things would have gone next if not for the stupid invasion of Afghanistan at the end of 1979. And so it began.
    Sanctions
    Boycott the Olympics
    Tightening of COCOM control
    Medium-range missiles in Europe
    Reagan and his evil empire and the starry screams
    A savage campaign against the USSR in the media
    Oil price noose
    They gave a reason themselves...
    1. -3
      24 September 2026 19: 10
      Should we have switched to horses and lived by kerosene lamps?
  19. -2
    24 September 2026 19: 09
    Dear Author.
    Global issue.
    When did the foreign automobile companies listed in the article appear?
    And most importantly, how did they survive the First and Second World Wars?
  20. +4
    24 September 2026 19: 14
    Hello everyone! I'm from Kostanay and have driven past the Diesel plant many times. At one time, there were high hopes for the production of these engines; a friend of mine worked as a mechanic at the Diesel plant. But then Perestroika happened, along with a fire at KAMAZ, and production slowly died down. It got to the point in the 90s that they were removing the machine tools and dismantling the plant itself. But then the Russians arrived and began assembling combine harvesters there, and then K-701 tractors and UAZ and VAZ automobiles.
    Currently, they assemble KIA cars and various Chinese ones there.
  21. +2
    24 September 2026 19: 56
    Quote: your1970
    Here's an example with the engine - they bought EVERYTHING(!!!!) for their production

    This is not only in the automotive industry.
    A tale from the world of fashion:
    Someone decided to experiment with a Pierre Cardin suit—cut it up and tried to sew it back together. The idea was to test how well the material could be reworked, or just for fun. Naturally, the process ran into some difficulties: the fabric didn't behave as expected, the pieces didn't fit together perfectly, and ultimately, the experiment failed—the suit lost its shape, became warped, and developed holes.

    Such are the cases.
  22. +2
    25 September 2026 08: 32
    The late 60s and 70s marked the beginning of large-scale socialist construction projects. The oil and gas provinces of Western Siberia were being developed, and the Baikal-Amur Mainline was being built.
    In August of this year, fate brought me together with a man who worked on the BAM construction site in the 70s.
    His unique memory retains the smallest details of life during that period with exquisite clarity, including the equipment used at the construction site.
    I recorded his story on a dictaphone; it took about 2 hours.
    He said that there were mainly Magiruses and only in one area the boss ordered KrAZs for some reason.
    I recalled that they even had homemade crew vans on Magirus chassis at their site. Truck drivers earned about 900 rubles a month, and most importantly, they had the opportunity to get a coupon for a passenger car after two and a half years.
    He also spoke in detail about the excavators, graders, etc. used.
    I have this idea in my head to reprint his story and post it here, maybe in the winter when I have nothing to do I’ll do it
    1. 0
      25 September 2026 10: 18
      Only at one site the boss for some reason ordered KrAZ trucks.

      All civilians drove Magiruses, but the Ministry of Defense's motorized battalions were equipped with KrAZs.
      1. +1
        25 September 2026 12: 00
        The man said that "civilian" KrAZ trucks were working at one of the sites, and he even named the name of the site manager.
        But that's not the point; his story about a homemade work van on a Magirus chassis is much more interesting.
  23. -1
    25 September 2026 09: 44
    The Magirus's cabin is very similar to the GAZ-3307's cabin without the hood and fenders—the difference is the windshield height (meaning the GAZ's cabin is just slightly lower). And it's a bit like the MAZ's cabin, with its more square shape after the rounded 500 series...
    1. -1
      25 September 2026 10: 19
      And the Magirus cabin is very similar to the GAZ-3307 cabin without the hood and fenders

      on the contrary ...
  24. 0
    25 September 2026 12: 03
    The steering is extremely heavy, the cabin is wooden
    Wooden cabins were made only during the war on GAZ-MMV and ZIS-5V trucks.
    KrAZ had a wood-metal-cardboard structure. laughing
  25. 0
    25 September 2026 20: 30
    Thanks to the author for this fascinating article! I couldn't stop reading it. I love technology. I saw a Magirus dump truck a couple of times as a kid. I was about 10 years old then. I was especially intrigued by the bright color of the truck. I'd never seen anything like it. Thanks again!
  26. -2
    27 September 2026 17: 32
    Interestingly, the entire interior of the Kamaz truck currently competing in the Paris-Dakar desert rally is imported. Fifty years have passed, and a good diesel engine has still not been developed.
    It's just sad to look at regular KamAZ trucks on the roads, which, when loaded on a hill, smoke and stink and can't even reach 70 km/h.
    1. 0
      28 September 2026 01: 02
      Don't (sh...) shit on a KamAZ! In 2020, I was driving a used Elantra I bought. The low beams, as it turned out, were terrible. I pulled in behind some truck that was doing a brisk 90 km/h. It turned out to be from my village. And when I overtook it at the traffic light, I was surprised to see it was a KamAZ. 90 and with a trailer! I would have doubted it if someone had told me that. So it's not right to speed up something that's long gone.
  27. 0
    28 September 2026 00: 54
    From the fall of 80 to the spring of 81, I served in a training camp near Chita (Antipikha). That's when I first saw the Magirus. From a distance, this orange dump truck looked like a Kamaz with a hood. I didn't get a chance to examine this oddity up close, but when a local told me it was a "German" with an air-cooled diesel engine, I became very intrigued and tried to read about it at every opportunity. I became a fan, so much so that one of the trucks in my son's toy "garage" was a Magirus Deutsch.
  28. 0
    28 September 2026 20: 58
    Quote: Black Colonel
    Don't (sh...) shit on a KamAZ! In 2020, I was driving a used Elantra I bought. The low beams, as it turned out, were terrible. I pulled in behind some truck that was doing a brisk 90 km/h. It turned out to be from my village. And when I overtook it at the traffic light, I was surprised to see it was a KamAZ. 90 and with a trailer! I would have doubted it if someone had told me that. So it's not right to speed up something that's long gone.

    I was writing about loaded trucks on a hill. I'd be very surprised if a Kamaz with a load couldn't go 90 km/h in a straight line. It wouldn't be able to do 105-110 km/h loaded.