Airborne Forces in the Battle of Moscow

4 028 62
Airborne Forces in the Battle of Moscow
Pictured: Ivan Georgievich Starchak, a Soviet frontline reconnaissance officer and paratrooper. He was one of the leaders of the defense on the Warsaw Highway in October 1941. He commanded several airborne assaults in 1941–1942.


In August 1941, a parachute landing detachment for the Western Front began to form in a camp near Yukhnov. Captain Ivan Georgievich Starchak became its commander. The detachment was staffed by soldiers from frontline airfield units. In addition, it included several dozen well-trained paratroopers from the 214th Airborne Brigade. In total, the detachment numbered over 400 men.



The enemy was rapidly advancing east, and by October 4, Starchak's detachment was ordered to take up defensive positions along the Ugra River near Yukhnov. This line was located just 205 km from the capital. Apart from the paratroopers, no other military units were present at the time. The eastern bank of the Ugra River, where the detachment took up defensive positions, dominated the terrain ahead. The detachment's main efforts were focused on controlling a narrow strip of highway. On the morning of October 5, the detachment repelled the first enemy onslaught. Throughout the day, the paratroopers had to repel several more fierce attacks.

That same day, at dawn, a small group of paratroopers led by pilot Senior Lieutenant Balashov raided the airfield from which Soviet pilots had failed to ferry three TB-3 bombers. The paratroopers burned two of the aircraft and stole one. Balashov, who had never piloted a four-engine aircraft before, took off in it.

The fighting on October 6 and 7 was particularly severe. Leaving a small group of paratroopers on the riverbank near the Varshavskoye Highway to cover the detachment's exit from the battle, Captain Starchak led the company to an intermediate defensive line in the village of Strekalovo. A company of cadets and a battery of 76-mm guns from the Podolsk Military School arrived here, significantly strengthening the detachment. But even with these forces, it was difficult to count on a stable defense.

On October 8, the enemy committed new forces to the battle. The paratroopers, having repelled fierce enemy attacks, retreated to a new defensive line along the Izver River on the night of October 9. On the morning of October 9, the Nazis attempted to force their advance detachments and reconnaissance groups across the river in several places, but were unsuccessful.

The paratroopers held their bank. The artillerymen ran out of ammunition, and the detachment suffered significant losses. It now numbered less than a hundred men. The detachment commander was forced to concentrate all those capable of fighting at the crossing.

By the evening of October 9, the paratroopers were replaced by tank crews. While 410 paratroopers blocked the enemy's path at the 205th kilometer on October 4, only about 60 remained on October 9, at the 180th kilometer from Moscow. But the losses were not in vain. It took the Nazis five days to cover the 25 kilometers.

This is how courageously and steadfastly the paratroopers defended Moscow in the autumn of 1941 in this direction.

At dawn on December 5, 1941, Soviet troops launched the first powerful counterattacks against enemy troops near Moscow.

Formations of the 3rd and 4th German tank Having suffered defeat near Moscow, the German groups attempted to consolidate their positions along the Leningrad Highway. To this end, the enemy hastily reinforced its Klin group, launching a series of fierce counterattacks and counterattacks. However, troops from the 20th and 1st Shock Armies blocked the German forces in Klin and began to destroy them.

In this situation, the Nazis began to retreat to Volokolamsk, hoping to consolidate their position on the advantageous natural defensive line along the Lama and Ruza rivers, which had been prepared in advance. The enemy troops retreated along the only road leading to Teryaeva Sloboda, which had not yet been intercepted. It was here that Starchak's detachment was deployed.

On the night of December 15, Starchak's paratroopers intercepted the road, destroyed bridges, disrupted communication lines, and blocked the retreat of Nazi troops. The paratroopers not only cut the road from Klin to Teryaeva Sloboda. With decisive action, they intercepted all possible Nazi escape routes in this area and elsewhere to the west. Day after day, the paratroopers attacked troop columns, destroying small enemy garrisons and enemy equipment, especially fuel transports, without which all vehicles and tank companies would be reduced to rubble. Where the paratroopers operated, nighttime road traffic was completely paralyzed. As soon as dusk fell, everything came to a standstill until dawn. Even during the day, the Nazis accompanied their columns with tanks. But even tanks were of no help to the enemy.

The enemy was exhausted, trying in vain to destroy the brave paratroopers. Signs proclaiming "Russian Paratroopers" appeared on the roads, and arrows on these signs indicated dangerous areas.

Punitive detachments with tanks and armored vehicles were deployed against the landing force. To intimidate them, the Germans hung dead paratroopers on telegraph poles with placards declaring that the German command would punish anyone who resisted them in this manner. But all the measures taken by the Nazis only fueled the paratroopers' anger and hatred for the enemy, spurring them on to fight even more fiercely.

During 9 days of combat operations, the detachment blew up 29 bridges, burned 48 vehicles, 2 tanks, 2 staff cars, destroyed a lot of weapons and killed more than 400 enemy soldiers and officers.

From December 18th to 24th, Captain Starchak's detachment blocked the Klin-Volokolamsk, Lotoshino-Volokolamsk, and Novo-Petrovskoye-Klin roads, as well as the Shakhovskaya-Novopetrovskoye railway. Naturally, the relatively small detachment was unable to liberate the large settlements where significant Nazi forces were concentrated.

Operating in small groups on enemy communications in a vast area, the paratroopers contributed to the successful offensive of troops in the Volokolamsk-Klin direction.

In the winter of 1941-1942, Nazi German forces, defeated near Moscow, retreated under attack from Soviet troops, attempting to hold on to their prepared lines. Nazi resistance gradually increased as fresh forces were brought to the front. However, Soviet troops from the center and left flank of the Western Front continued their advance and by early January had reached the Naro-Fominsk-Kaluga line.

At this time, the enemy's Kondrovo-Yukhnov-Medyn group was the strongest for the Western Front's troops. Its rapid defeat was the most important task for the Western Front's left wing army. This task was assigned to the front's left wing army and the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps.

In this situation, the command of the Western Front decided to use airborne assault forces in the offensive zone of the 43rd Army.

The airborne assault force included two parachute battalions under the command of Major Starchak, and the landing group for this assault force included the 250th Airborne Regiment. Regimental Commander Major Soldatov was appointed commander of the airborne assault force.

On January 3, 1942, the airborne assault force was given the following mission: after landing behind enemy lines, cut the road from Medyn to Gzhatsk and all roads northwest of the Varshavskoye Highway; capture Myatlevo Station and disrupt rail traffic; and prevent a possible enemy retreat from Medyn to Yukhnov and from Yukhnov to Myatlevo Station.

Preparations for the airdrop and the development of an action plan to maintain surprise were completed before the airborne assault commander was assigned his mission. The plan called for Major Starchak's parachute battalion to be dropped onto the airfield near Bol'shoy Fot'yanovo to seize and secure the landing force, which was to be transported by TB-3 and PS-84 aircraft.

The 2nd Parachute Battalion, detached from the 201st Airborne Brigade, was tasked with the following: after landing in the area of ​​Gusevo, Bordukovo and Isakovo (all points 12-15 km northwest of Medyn), part of the forces were to seize and firmly hold the bridge over the Shanya River and the Shansky Plant, capture and hold Kremenskoye, and the main forces were to reach the Yukhnov-Medyn highway, where they were to blow up the bridge over the Shanya River 1 km southwest of Kosovo and, having set up strong barriers, stop all movement on the highway.

After the paratroopers captured the airfield near Bol'shoy Fot'yanovo, the main airborne forces—the 250th Airborne Regiment (1300 men)—were to land there.

The number of aircraft allocated for the landing was limited, but it still allowed for the paratroopers to be dropped in one flight and the landing troops to be transported in two or three flights. From the morning of January 3, 1942, the plan called for reconnaissance of the airfields and aviation Enemy airborne forces in the areas adjacent to the landing site and airborne combat operations were to be monitored. An hour and a half before the parachute group's departure, a special aircraft was to be dispatched to conduct weather reconnaissance along the flight route and in the landing area, as the weather at that time of year was very unstable, and frequent blizzards and snowfalls created significant difficulties for aircraft flights and paratrooper drops.

Several hours before the paratroopers dropped, immediately before the landing, it was planned to carry out an air strike on the suspected garrisons and reserves of the enemy in the areas of Medyn, Aduyev, Govardova station, Yukhnov, in order to distract the enemy from the landing area and prevent its reserves from approaching this area to fight the paratroopers.

Due to significant air activity and intense enemy anti-aircraft fire, the decision was made to conduct the airdrop at night. Fighter aircraft from the Moscow zone were assigned to cover the initial landing area (Vnukovo airfield). Defense.

To capture the airfield, the parachute assault force was composed of capture teams, support teams, reserves, and launch teams. The capture team was tasked with suppressing the resistance of the garrison's flight and technical personnel and seizing the airfield, airfield materiel, structures, and communications equipment. The team was dropped directly onto the airfield.

The support group was dropped 1-2 kilometers from the airfield to capture defensive positions and prevent enemy reserves from approaching the airfield.

The parachute landing commander's reserve, as part of a platoon, was dropped together with the battalion commander over the center of the airfield.

The launch team parachuted in thirty minutes after the parachute drop, following the capture team, along with the radio and propulsion equipment. Launch equipment was prepared to mark the landing site, and a night launch designation system was practiced. The launch team also included sappers and demolition experts to reconnoiter the airfield and remove obstacles.

It was assumed that if the landing signal had not been issued by the time the aircraft carrying the takeoff crew arrived at the airfield, the aircraft were to wait in the air for half an hour near the airfield. After this time, if there were no signals clearing landing, the aircraft carrying the takeoff crew were to return to their airfield.

The parachute commander set up his command post at the site where he landed and directed the battle to capture the airfield. He subsequently moved it to a location more convenient for directing the landing of the paratroopers and his own units. Immediately after the paratroopers landed, reconnaissance groups and patrols were dispatched in various directions, up to 5-10 kilometers from the airfield.

In the event of an unsuccessful attempt to capture the airfield, the airborne commander was to report this to the senior staff, and lead his detachment to join up with the 1st Battalion of the 201st Airborne Brigade or, in accordance with the prevailing situation, act to disrupt the enemy's command and control and rear services in the interests of the troops of the 43rd Army.

The full plan for combat operations behind enemy lines was thoroughly reviewed by all officers, and the airfield capture plan was "played out" on maps. Furthermore, the paratroopers were familiarized with all the details of the airfield capture prior to departure, and in the event of disorientation or an unsuccessful landing, each unit's paratrooper was to act independently to accomplish the overall mission.

Starchak's parachute landing unit was dropped on the night of January 4, as planned, at the Bol'shoy Fot'yanovo airfield. After landing, approximately 15 percent of the group failed to report to the assembly point. Nevertheless, the airborne commander, without waiting for the entire group to assemble, launched an attack. However, they were only able to suppress enemy resistance and capture the airfield by the end of January 4. During the battle, the paratroopers destroyed twelve firing positions.

Having captured the airfield, the paratroopers began defending it and preparing it to receive transport aircraft carrying landing troops. But on the morning of January 5, the weather changed dramatically, and a severe snowstorm arose. The airfield was buried in snowdrifts.

Due to severe weather conditions on January 5 and 6 and the changing operational situation during this time, the airdrop and landing of the remaining airborne forces in the designated areas were cancelled, and Major Starchak's parachute force transitioned to independent sabotage operations behind enemy lines in the 43rd Army's offensive zone. On the night of January 8, a surprise attack by the detachment captured Myatlevo station, where two enemy trains carrying tanks and other combat vehicles were destroyed.

From January 8 to 18, the detachment conducted combat operations in the exceptionally difficult conditions of the harsh winter of 1941-1942 on the roads south of Medyn, in the area of ​​Kondrovo, Polotnyany Zavod, and only on January 19, with the permission of the front command, Major Starchak's paratroopers joined up with units of the 43rd Army.

With their bold and decisive actions, Major Starchak's parachute detachment disrupted railway traffic for a while in the area of ​​Myatlevo station and partially disrupted the work of the German rear troops in front of the Forty-Third Army, which significantly contributed to its successful offensive.

Due to the failure of the planned airborne assault in the Bol'shoy Fot'yanovo area, a new decision was made to use airborne assault forces.

The task of the troops of the left wing of the front remained the same - to encircle and defeat the Yukhnov-Myatlevo group of Nazis and to develop their success in the north-west direction to Vyazma.

The airborne assault force, consisting of the 250th Airborne Regiment and 2 battalions of the 201st Airborne Brigade, landed with the aim of facilitating the successful offensive of the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps and troops of the left wing of the Western Front in encircling and destroying the said enemy group.

The landing area was designated southeast of Vyazma, near the village of Zhelanya. As a result, airborne operations in this area intercepted the main supply routes for the enemy's Yukhnovo-Myatlevo group.

Significant Nazi forces were stationed in and near the landing zone: in the district center of Znamenka, there was a division headquarters, rear units, and up to a battalion of infantry; at the Godunovka siding, an ammunition depot and a guard force of about a battalion; in the village of Podsosonki, a large headquarters; at Klimov Zavod, Sidorovskoye, Sinikovo, and Gubino, up to a battalion of infantry each; at the Debryansky siding and at Ugra station, up to two battalions. However, due to heavy snowdrifts, these garrisons were almost isolated from one another. Only the most important roads were maintained. Therefore, the paratroopers, possessing excellent mobility while operating on skis, were able to strike at individual, even strong, garrisons and successfully disrupt enemy movement along the rare passable roads.

The use of airborne assault forces was planned to be carried out by a limited number of transport aircraft, crews well trained for night flights, in three stages:

the first stage is the dropping of parachute troops to capture and hold the landing site in order to ensure the landing of landing troops on it;

the second stage is the landing of the launch team two hours and thirty minutes after the parachute landing;

The third stage is the landing of the landing force 30 minutes after the landing of the launch team.

On the nights of January 18 and 19, 1942, paratroopers were dropped. The drop was successful, although due to unfavorable weather, some crews returned without completing their mission. However, once the weather improved, the crews of these aircraft, on follow-up sorties, dropped their paratroopers precisely at the designated location.

During the parachute group's landing, an amendment was made to the landing plan: between the first and second flights of this group, by the end of January 18, a launch team with a radio station and wired communication equipment was transferred on four aircraft.

By the morning of January 19, the parachute landing group, the launch team, and the local population had prepared a landing site, to which, over the next three nights, the landing force was transferred – the 250th Airborne Regiment, consisting of 1600 men, along with 100 heavy and light machine guns, 90 mortars, and anti-tank guns.

Enemy aircraft, having discovered the airborne landing area, began bombing and machine-gunning it from the very first day. However, thanks to the paratroopers' swift action, losses throughout the entire landing were insignificant.

The paratroopers had to not only prepare the landing site for the landing force, but also, without waiting for it to land, begin carrying out the combat mission.

On January 20, the airborne commander was given a clarified combat mission: units of the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps were attacking from the south in the direction of Vyazma with the aim of breaking through the Nazi defenses along the Warsaw Highway and subsequent actions in the rear west of Vyazma.

Front Commander Zhukov ordered a portion of the airborne forces to capture the enemy stronghold of Klyuchi by the morning of January 26 and to attack toward Lyudkovo to assist the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps in breaking through the defenses. Two parachute battalions under the command of Captain Surzhik were dispatched to accomplish this task.

The landing forces held the line Luga - Zhelanye - Znamenka.

Separate detachments from the 250th Airborne Regiment operated along the Yukhnov-Vyazma road, impeding enemy troop movements. Carrying out their assigned mission, the combined paratrooper detachment immediately captured several settlements, destroying enemy garrisons. By the morning of January 22, they had captured Petrishchevo, and the following day, near the village of Tynovka, they linked up with the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps and came under the operational control of its commander.

On January 30, in the Glukhovo area, the landing force established contact with units of this corps, and on February 4, it came under the command of the commander of the 239th Rifle Division, which was part of General Belov’s cavalry corps.

Subsequently, the battalions of the 201st Airborne Brigade and the 250th Airborne Regiment operated behind enemy lines until joining up with the front troops at the end of June 1942.

The airborne assault force accomplished a crucial mission: it intercepted and held the enemy's most important routes in the rear of its Yukhnov group for several days, hampering the maneuver of its forces and assets, disrupting the work of its rear, thereby facilitating the offensive operations of the left wing troops of the Western Front.
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    23 September 2026 05: 12
    Except for the capture of Crete, no airborne operation by any army in the world has resulted in success, only heavy losses of well-trained soldiers. Therefore, the world has cooled toward the Airborne Forces, except for the Soviet Army for some reason... And yet, over the past 35 years, even in the halcyon peacetime conditions, no exercise involving the parachute drop of a division has been conducted. Either there are no planes, or the weather is unfavorable, or there isn't a large enough field. The Airborne Forces' successful ground operations during WWII were due to a more careful selection of conscripts for these troops, based on both health and education.
    1. +3
      23 September 2026 09: 17
      It's too early for you to start "exposing" the Airborne Forces. So, the "absolute uselessness of the Airborne Forces" worries you so much you can't even sleep?
      1. +3
        23 September 2026 09: 59
        Quote: Vladimir_Kuznetsov
        that you can't even sleep?

        Different time zone, don't let that bother you
    2. +4
      23 September 2026 12: 24
      Except for the capture of Crete, no airborne operation of all the armies of the world led to success.
      It is not.
      1. -1
        23 September 2026 12: 25
        Quote: Trapp1st
        Except for the capture of Crete, no airborne operation of all the armies of the world led to success.
        It is not.

        Name
        1. +3
          23 September 2026 12: 25
          Denmark - Masnø and the Storstrøm Bridge 04/09/1940 Paratroopers captured the bridge and coastal fortress Success
          Denmark - Aalborg 04/09/1940 Parachute landing captured the airfield Success
          Norway - Sola/Stavanger 04/09/1940 Airfield captured, then main forces transferred Success
          Norway - Oslo area 04/09/1940 Airborne forces ensured the capture of Forneby airfield and the rapid reinforcement of Oslo. Success
          Netherlands 10.05.1940 Landings on airfields and bridges, including important crossings Overall success
          Greece - Corinth 04/26/1941 Paratroopers captured the area of ​​the bridge over the Corinth Canal Success
          Crete 20.05–1.06.1941 The largest German airborne assault of the war Victory, but with huge losses
          Kos 3.10.1943 German paratroopers landed together with naval forces Success
          On November 12, 1943, paratroopers from I./FJR 2 participated in the assault on Uspeh Island. This is part of the successful Fallschirmjäger operations.
          1. +2
            23 September 2026 13: 02
            These are small, more sabotage operations,
            Quote: Trapp1st
            Norway - Oslo area 9.04.1940 Airborne forces secured the capture of Forneby airfield

            In this particular case, the paratroopers did not jump; strong anti-aircraft fire prevented the transport from reaching them, and they landed at an airfield already captured by an infantry assault group.
            And the rest of the operations were more like sabotage operations with small numbers, and the enemy didn't put up much of a fight. It was like our landings in the late twenties of August 45, when Japan surrendered on August 15.
            1. -2
              23 September 2026 14: 33
              From recent history, the Gostomel landing on February 24, 2022
              on 30 helicopters Ka-52, Mi-24, Mi-28, Mi-8
              1. +4
                23 September 2026 14: 37
                Quote: Romario_Argo
                From recent history, the Gostomel landing on February 24, 2022
                on 30 helicopters Ka-52, Mi-24, Mi-28, Mi-8

                The landing was by air, not parachute...and six helicopters were shot down!!! What made the landing so successful? They couldn't organize support.
                1. +2
                  23 September 2026 14: 57
                  Parachutes are no longer essential, whether you're landing troops on a ballistic trajectory through orbit from the Zarya landing module or from I. Musk's Dragon
              2. +3
                23 September 2026 16: 02
                It's useless to give examples to the public here. Their idea of ​​the Airborne Forces is a sky covered in parachutes... Just like in the movies.
              3. 0
                24 September 2026 12: 47
                One of the positive examples of the SVO is the capture of the Antonovsky Bridge. This was an unequivocal success.
                The Gostomel landing was a complete failure. They landed and landed, and then it was total chaos. They couldn't keep the airport running. And a bunch of guys died trying to rescue the paratroopers.
                It's clear that the paratroopers themselves aren't to blame here, but rather the people who planned the operation and underpaid them a bit... This is the Airborne Forces' main problem. It's difficult to plan such complex operations. It's very difficult to foresee every detail. Let's say the paratroopers completed their work accurately and on time, but will their contractors be able to do the same? That's precisely why Comrade Staly disbanded the Airborne Forces.
            2. +1
              23 September 2026 17: 11
              The Normandy landings, a naval assault, combined with the landing of entire Allied airborne divisions. The Rhineland Operation.
              1. +1
                23 September 2026 17: 44
                Quote: Sergey Tkach
                The Normandy landings, a naval assault, combined with the landing of entire Allied airborne divisions. The Rhineland Operation.

                The 1st British Airborne Division was airdropped into the Arnhem area, then a Polish airborne brigade was airdropped to help... the Poles were completely annihilated, and of the 10 British, only 3 survived... I wasn't writing about mere airborne landings, but about successful operations. Yes, the 82nd American Airborne Division captured the bridge over the Rhine, but that was more due to the British tank division...
          2. +2
            23 September 2026 17: 15
            Belgium. May 10, 1940. The landing of 3000 paratroopers in The Hague. Colonel Sponeck, one of the founders of the German airborne forces, led the operation. He was later relieved of his divisional command for failures in Crimea in late 1941, imprisoned in 1942, and executed in 1944.
            1. 0
              23 September 2026 17: 54
              The assault wave of the landing force was to include the 1st Battalion of the 2nd Parachute Regiment (less the third company, which was dropped at Ockenburg) – a total of 480 men transported on 53 Junkers-52s. The paratroopers had half an hour to clear the airfield's security and ensure the landing of the aircraft of the first wave of the landing force. As they approached their target, the German transports encountered intense ground fire. Three aircraft were shot down directly over the airfield, while the rest, evading the fire, scattered and dropped their paratroopers wherever they could, coming under fire from Dutch anti-aircraft guns in the process. Of the 53 aircraft in the assault wave, only 27 returned to base – the rest were either shot down or damaged and made emergency landings.

              Farther

              The parachute landing force was scattered over a large area (approximately 3 by 4 km) away from the airfield, so the paratroopers were unable to fulfill their mission of supporting the landing force. The first wave of the landing force consisted of 12 Junkers aircraft, carrying the headquarters of the 65th Infantry Regiment, led by Colonel Friemel, a communications platoon, and the regiment's 6th and 8th companies. The aircraft attempted to land, but came under intense fire from 20mm automatic weapons and anti-aircraft machine guns. Dutch armored cars and riflemen opened fire on the landed aircraft. Ten of the 12 aircraft exploded and caught fire, the vast majority of the crew and paratroopers burned alive inside their aircraft. Those who managed to escape (including the regiment commander) were captured by the Dutch in a state of shock. The second wave (14 Junkers-52) almost completely shared the fate of the first – the aircraft were destroyed during or after landing.

              What kind of successful landing is this? Maybe that's enough?
              That's why Hitler banned such landings.
              1. 0
                23 September 2026 22: 10
                I didn't say they were successful. I meant massive. Near The Hague, there were 1200 prisoners and 150+ Ju-52 transport aircraft lost.
                And about the fact that after the Crete operation, both the Allies and we had massive operations. The Dnieper (extremely unsuccessful), the Rhine (successful). Regarding the Normandy operation—it accomplished its task. The Germans dispersed their forces.
    3. +1
      23 September 2026 20: 15
      Don't confuse a parachute landing with an airborne operation. Operation Danube. The first stage—the capture of airfields—was carried out by special forces and airborne troops. A very successful operation—in a military/troop unit.
      1. +1
        23 September 2026 20: 55
        The same thing happened in Hungary in 1956. Pristina International Airport in 1999. In 1992, the evacuation of the Russian embassy from Kabul, captured by the mujahideen.
    4. +2
      24 September 2026 10: 25
      During the capture of Crete, the Germans suffered very heavy losses, practically a Pyrrhic victory.
  2. +4
    23 September 2026 05: 34
    Author, it would be advisable to provide links to documents, both ours and German, so that we could assess the impact of the paratroopers' actions behind enemy lines... and what you published here has long been available with your authorship on Proza.ru and other sources with the same pathos, like

    The airborne assault force completed a crucial mission: intercepting and holding the enemy's most important routes for several days.

    And what routes did the landing force intercept? The railways and highways from Smolensk and Roslavl to Vyazma, Gzhatsk, and Rzhev...can you clarify?
    1. +2
      23 September 2026 08: 20
      No German documents were clearly used in writing.
    2. +1
      23 September 2026 09: 19
      Do you read me on proza.ru too? How unexpected...
      1. +2
        23 September 2026 10: 00
        Quote: Vladimir_Kuznetsov
        Do you read me on proza.ru too? How unexpected...

        I just typed a few phrases into the search.
        1. +1
          23 September 2026 10: 20
          So everything's fine. If it can be found in a search engine, then I'm moving forward! I'm setting new goals!
    3. +3
      23 September 2026 10: 42
      You know, I don't see any archivists on the website either—all published sources are open source. Which local authors work in the archives and use authentic documents?

      As for the collection I am referring to, its compilers did indeed rely on archival documents: combat journals, summaries and reports.
      1. +2
        23 September 2026 11: 18
        Which local authors work in archives and use authentic documents?
        Please don't take this as bragging, but although I don't work directly at TsAMO, in my military history essays I rely on information from Red Army documents held at TsAMO and made publicly available to researchers of the history of the war.
        1. +2
          23 September 2026 11: 21
          Quote: Lewww
          Which local authors work in archives and use authentic documents?
          Please don't take this as bragging, but although I don't work directly at TsAMO, in my military history essays I rely on information from Red Army documents held at TsAMO and made publicly available to researchers of the history of the war.

          The Pamyat Naroda website has a lot of documents, including railway documents, orders, reports, maps...a lot of stuff. I use it too. However, I think they've started removing the "inconvenient" ones; there used to be more documents.
          1. +1
            23 September 2026 11: 24
            That's what I said: everything that is downloaded here is open source.
          2. 0
            23 September 2026 11: 37
            I agree, it feels like instead of introducing access to new documents, TsAMO has started blocking access to previously published ones.
            For example, I'm now unable to open cards that opened without problems a year ago.
            Also, many award sheets stopped opening.
            A strange policy: in all countries, documents stored in archives have long been digitized and are freely accessible to all citizens, including the ability to copy them free of charge.
            On the contrary, TsAMO is trying to close as many documents as possible, and providing copies is only possible for a fee - 100 rubles per sheet, if I'm not mistaken.
            Even taking photographs of documents is prohibited - this ban is completely incomprehensible
      2. +6
        23 September 2026 11: 19
        Which local authors work in archives and use authentic documents?
        Shpakovsky V. O.
        1. +4
          23 September 2026 11: 40
          I give you a standing ovation—I'm completely serious! I have the utmost respect for those who have access to classified documents.
          When I approached local historians I knew about the Krasno Pakhorsky Extermination Battalion (my grandfather served in it because he didn't want to sit at home (he wasn't eligible for mobilization due to his age), they replied that they were very interested in the topic themselves. However, the documents are stored in the State Security Archives, and they are denied access.
          1. +3
            23 September 2026 12: 11
            I give you a standing ovation—I'm completely serious! I have the utmost respect for those who have access to classified documents.
            Shpakovsky doesn't have access to classified documents; he simply occasionally rummages through his regional archives for publication.
            1. +3
              23 September 2026 13: 20
              The man actually works, unlike the commentators here, who, as you said, dig around not in archives, but on the Internet.
              1. +3
                23 September 2026 13: 36
                The man actually works, unlike the commentators here,
                You're being silly and ignorant of people. Go to the profile of one of your opponents (Lewww) and you'll see that he's the author of 52 articles.
                1. +4
                  23 September 2026 16: 05
                  This is the opponent who hasn't been able to calm down for a year and a half after my essays and articles about the events of December 1979? About Operation Baikal-79, which the opponent mistakenly called "Storm-333" in his articles, which in reality was the signal for the start of military operations.
                  1. +2
                    23 September 2026 16: 13
                    Is this the opponent who has been unable to calm down for a year and a half after my essays and articles about the events of December 1979?
                    You can't please everyone. Every author has his critics, and Lev had his too.
                    1. +4
                      23 September 2026 16: 22
                      You know, I'm not opposed to other people's writing. But by writing about the coup in Kabul, in which I was directly involved, I fell out of favor with my opponent. I'm writing this comment now and laughing: the guy hasn't been able to slow down for a year and a half, he's so consumed by anger.
                      1. -1
                        23 September 2026 22: 46
                        In my opinion, you are overcome with anger because I periodically draw your attention to obvious blunders in your publications, which for some reason you perceive as a gross insult to your airborne religion. laughing
                        Believe me, I criticize not only your publications, and only on those subjects that I know quite well.
                        In particular, on the history of the Battle of Moscow, which I have studied for a long time and from historical documents.
                        And he even made several scientific and historical publications on this story.

                        By the way, there is a serious mistake in the title of your article - the word "battle" in this phrase should be written with a capital letter, since this is the individual name of a specific battle.
                        Remember this for the future so you don't look ignorant again. Yes
      3. 0
        23 September 2026 22: 41
        "I don't see anything on the archivists' website..." - there's definitely at least one author - Vyacheslav Olegovich Shpakovsky...
        1. +1
          23 September 2026 22: 47
          Yes, I know. They said Shpakovsky works in the archives. He's a great guy!
    4. -1
      23 September 2026 10: 50
      Author, it is advisable to provide links to documents.
      The author has a chronic problem with providing documents, and for some reason he perceives requests to provide them with great offense and regards them as an attempt to insult someone. Yes
  3. +1
    23 September 2026 07: 47
    Therefore, the paratroopers, possessing good mobility when operating on skis, could strike at individual, even strong garrisons and successfully disrupt enemy movement along rare passable roads.

    Even strong garrisons... and which ones? Just some generalities... For example, a combined detachment of wagon drivers and chemists from the 1196th Rifle Regiment routed a company of the SS "Der Führer" Regiment on February 15, 42, and liberated the village of Lebzino near Rzhev. Or there was a battle in which a squad of tank destroyers, using dogs loaded with explosives to their belts, liberated a village near Rzhev through a peculiar psychological attack... And why this exaggeration of the paratroopers' individual achievements in the guise of a school essay? Back then, there was the mass heroism of our forefathers across all branches of the armed forces, from medical instructors to pilots. And the influence of the tank brigades of Katukov, Rotmistrov, Lesovoy, and Kirichenko, and the Getman Division near Tula, on the course of the fighting near Moscow, was very significant, as was the Moscow air defense aviation, which grounded the Luftwaffe.
    1. +2
      23 September 2026 10: 24
      And who or what is stopping tank crews from telling their stories, and pilots from telling theirs? Alexander Vasilyevich Margelov often repeated, "If there's no memory, there won't be us."
      1. +1
        23 September 2026 10: 36
        Quote: Vladimir_Kuznetsov
        And who or what is stopping tank crews from telling their stories, and pilots from telling theirs? Alexander Vasilyevich Margelov often repeated, "If there's no memory, there won't be us."

        So what about the slogan "nobody but us"? It turns out there are many other, more significant ones...
        1. +3
          23 September 2026 10: 45
          We remember. And we constantly remind them. This is what the Airborne Forces' enemies don't like. And they even complain: why did they forget the pilots or the tank crews? Write, remember, tell us.
        2. +1
          24 September 2026 10: 32
          Where does this hostility towards the Airborne Forces come from? Did they beat you up on August 2nd of some year and have you been feeling this hostility ever since? For example, the Airborne Forces guys saved my life, and not just mine, and I still remember them.
  4. +1
    23 September 2026 10: 29
    But the troops of the 20th and 1st Shock Armies blocked the German forces in Klin and began to act to destroy them.
    20A was not in operation in Klin, 30A and 1 UDA were in operation there.
    Enemy troops retreated along the only road leading to Teryaeva Sloboda, which had not yet been intercepted. This is where Starchak's detachment was deployed.

    On the night of December 15, Starchak's paratroopers intercepted the road
    Question to the author: can you name it? In what documents is the KA Was a parachute landing recorded in the Volokolamsk region on December 14-15?
    I was once interested in this issue and looked for documents on the Memory of the People website, but found nothing.
    I would be grateful for a hint where to find it. documents of the CA, recording this event
    1. 0
      23 September 2026 10: 56
      On December 13, 1941, along with the 8th and 21st Tank Brigades, the 145th Separate Tank Battalion, and the 2nd Motorized Rifle Regiment, it became part of a mobile group tasked with cutting the highway in the Klin-Vysokovsk sector and closing the encirclement around Klin. During the offensive, the regiment advanced toward Vysokovsk. On December 14, 1941, it engaged in unusually fierce fighting, repelling persistent enemy attacks. Near the village of Borisovo, 16 German tanks and an infantry battalion advanced on its outnumbered units. The regiment's units tenaciously defended their positions for a long time, but under pressure from superior enemy forces, they were forced to abandon the Klin highway and retreat into the forest north of Borisovo. A company of tanks from the 8th Tank Brigade was sent to assist the regiment. During the fierce fighting, the enemy was repelled and the situation was restored. 150 soldiers of this heroic unit died in the battle for the city of Klin. While urging his men to attack, the regiment's second commander, Captain Alexander Mikhailovich Milenkiy, died a hero's death (he was buried 2,5 km west of the village of Pershutino on December 15). Commissar Alexander Fyodorovich Gutselyuk was seriously wounded.

      Quote: Lewww
      I would be grateful for a tip on where to find the KA documents recording this event.

      I, too, was surprised by the paratroopers' actions, which were plucked out of thin air. This refers to the actions of the 46th Separate Motorcycle Regiment (four companies) as part of Lelyushenko's 30th Army... Where did those paratroopers come from?... And the regiment commander died from a direct hit from a tank.
  5. -1
    23 September 2026 12: 39
    On the night of December 15, Starchak's paratroopers intercepted the road, destroyed bridges, disrupted communication lines, and blocked the retreat of Nazi troops. The paratroopers not only cut off the road from Klin to Teryaeva Sloboda. With decisive actions they intercepted all possible escape routes of the Nazis in this area and in other areas to the west. Day after day, paratroopers attacked troop columns, destroying small enemy garrisons, enemy equipment, especially fuel transport, without which all vehicles and tank companies would turn into a pile of metal.
    I once tried to find a description of these actions in the KA documents on the Memory of the People website, but I found nothing.
    I only came across a brief mention in the collection BATTLE FOR MOSCOW, The Moscow Operation of the Western Front, published in 2006 by Eksmo, compiled from operational reports of the General Staff of the Red Army (I also have them, but there is no information about the parachute landing on December 14.12).
    The authors of the commentary wrote:
    1. +1
      23 September 2026 13: 00
      Simply put, the commentary states that Starchak's unit acted as a partisan unit - carrying out raids and not engaging in prolonged battles, and therefore could not block any escape routes.
      And in the operational report of the General Staff of the Army it is written that a cavalry group consisting of the 18th and 24th cavalry divisions was ordered to be deployed to the area of ​​Teryaeva Sloboda.
      1. 0
        23 September 2026 15: 12
        Quote: Lewww
        Simply put, the commentary states that Starchak's unit acted as a partisan unit - carrying out raids and not engaging in prolonged battles, and therefore could not block any escape routes.

        The author cites open sources. I think it's Wikipedia, but there request

        During the Klin-Solnechnogorsk Offensive Operation, German units retreated from the Klin area to Teryaeva Sloboda. Meanwhile, the Western Front command sought to immediately eliminate the enemy in Klin and quickly defeat them west of Klin, preventing them from gaining a foothold anywhere near Teryaeva Sloboda or Volokolamsk. Army Commander Lelyushenko put the 30th Army Commander Kuznetsov in front of him. The mission was to intercept the road to Teryaeva Sloboda and prevent the enemy from retreating along it. One of the measures envisioned an airborne assault.

        From December 14 to 23, a parachute group under the command of Starchak was dropped west of the city of Klin, north of Volokolamsk (Moscow region). According to one dataA 415-man group from the 214th Separate Airborne Brigade inflicted significant losses on the enemy's manpower (approximately 400 soldiers and officers), intercepting its communications and demoralizing the retreating German units, who had hoped to consolidate their position on a pre-prepared defensive line along the Lama and Ruza rivers. In total, the group destroyed 29 bridges, creating bottlenecks in the German troops' escape routes. In addition, under the exceptionally difficult conditions of a harsh winter, they also destroyed 50 vehicles, two tanks, two guns and a mortar crew, and a large number of German telephone and telegraph poles. Operating in small sabotage groups against enemy communications, the paratroopers forced the enemy to abandon their heavy weapons.

        According to other sourcesDue to organizational problems, instead of the planned two flights, 14 TB-3 aircraft of the 23rd Air Division made only one sortie, dropping 147 men led by Captain I. G. Starchak. Of these, 40 paratroopers landed on a village occupied by the Germans and perished in an unequal battle. Due to the small size of Starchak's detachment, he was unable to occupy and hold the highway passing through Teryaeva Sloboda, and was engaged primarily in sabotage operations.

        So, it's unclear which army Lelyushenko commanded. Kuznetsov commanded the 1st Independent Army, while Lelyushenko commanded the 30th. These are the sources.
        1. +3
          23 September 2026 16: 07
          Yes, Wikipedia is a valuable source of information. Are these archival documents? Wikipedia.
      2. -1
        23 September 2026 17: 22
        I'm afraid to ask. Were the soldiers dismounted to begin with? How were the horses airlifted?
        1. +2
          23 September 2026 18: 20
          Horses were not parachuted from planes.
  6. +2
    23 September 2026 15: 12
    Quote: Lewww
    Question for the author: can you name which spacecraft documents document the parachute landing in the Volokolamsk region on December 14-15?
    I was once interested in this issue and looked for documents on the Memory of the People website, but found nothing.
    I would be grateful for a tip on where to find the KA documents recording this event.
    As usual, the author responded with silence, I had to look for it myself and eventually found it.

    The landing of the troops is described in detail in Report of the headquarters and the Air Force of the Western Front on the parachute landing in the area northwest of Teryaev Sloboda, December 15, 1941. , the full text of the document can be found in the source
    https://proza.ru/2018/05/23/1583
    The same source indicates that in the same area where Starchak’s detachment was operating, units sent to the enemy’s rear were simultaneously operating. combined detachment under the command of the commander of the 107th Motorized Rifle Division, Colonel Porfiry Grigorievich Chanchibadze, initially numbering about 7 000 people.
    They blocked almost all the roads in the Teryaeva Sloboda area and helped Starchak's detachment
  7. +3
    23 September 2026 17: 19
    Vladimir Nikolaevich thank you for the series of articles!
    I recently visited the museum at the Airborne Forces School in Ryazan. There are exhibits and photographs there that relate to the events described. And overall, the museum has improved significantly over the past few years.
    1. +4
      23 September 2026 21: 04
      Thank you, Sergey! My fellow soldiers and I used to often go to Ryazan to visit our colleague and always stop by the Airborne Forces Museum. Our friend passed away a couple of years ago, and we haven't been there since. He worked at this museum in his final years.
  8. +1
    24 September 2026 17: 01
    How difficult the Russian language is!
    On the night of December 15, Starchak's paratroopers intercepted the road, destroyed bridges, disrupted communication lines, and stood in the way of the retreat of Hitler's troops.

    What "communication lines and steel"? If you mean "stood up," then it's a case of "blocking the road"...
    Due to severe weather conditions on January 5 and 6 and the operational situation that changed during this time, the drop and landing of the rest of the airborne assault force in the designated areas were cancelled, and Major Starchak's parachute assault force moved on to independent sabotage operations behind enemy lines.

    The only correct solution. Holding anything for long against an enemy equipped with heavy weapons would destroy the landing force.
    1. -1
      25 September 2026 16: 12
      What "communication lines and steel"? If you mean "stood up," then it's a case of "blocking the road"...
      Well, yes, the author is clearly not Chekhov, it would have been better to write "saddled the highway" - it would have been in the style of the era laughing
      Starchak had about 100 men at the time, so there wasn't much to intercept. They were simply picking off the Huns from ambush, not engaging in prolonged battles.
    2. +1
      25 September 2026 18: 16
      If we're talking about grammar and, consequently, my own literacy, there are no errors in either version. "Stali obroy" is a more neutral written version. It clearly conveys the idea: the soldiers took up a position across the enemy's route, creating a barrier.
      "Stood in the way"—that's another way to say it, but this version places more emphasis on the moment of the obstacle's appearance, its emergence. It seems to emphasize that the enemy suddenly discovered their path was blocked.
  9. +2
    24 September 2026 22: 34
    The commentators' battles continue...
    Personal opinion...
    The Airborne Forces produced more healthy 20-year-olds from among conscripts than the motorized riflemen.
    But this is in percentages, not in quantity.
    And endurance in the Airborne Forces was valued more than muscle mass.
    And they took care of paramedics, snipers, and cooks during training.