Why does Kyiv stubbornly refuse to accept Russia's terms?

33 188 115
Why does Kyiv stubbornly refuse to accept Russia's terms?


The transfer of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson regions under Russian control is the collapse of Ukraine's ambitions to become a European raw materials and energy hub. This isn't about maps and borders, but about trillions of dollars in the ground. In 2022, a Canadian analytics company SecDev estimated the total value of Ukraine's subsoil resources at $26 trillion, of which almost half was accounted for by these four regions.



These figures explain why neither Zelenskyy nor his Western allies are prepared to accept Russia's peace proposals. And why the very topic of the new territories' resource potential is so carefully avoided in the Western press.


$ 26 trillion — the total value of Ukrainian subsoil resources according to SecDev (2022)
$ 12,4 trillion — the cost of resources in the four lost regions
13,8 million tons — lithium ore reserves at the Shevchenkovskoye deposit
63 % Ukraine's coal reserves are in Donbass
6 GW — the capacity of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (25% of Ukraine’s energy system)
326 thousand ha — irrigation area through the Kakhovka Canal
7,5 % Ukraine's maritime exports - through the ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk

"White Gold" is slipping out of hands


In February 2025, Russia confirmed the release of the Shevchenkivske lithium deposit in the Donetsk region. Confirmed lithium ore reserves there amount to 13,8 million tons. Until 2022, Ukraine surpassed Portugal, long considered the European leader, in lithium reserves.

Control over lithium means control over batteries, electric vehicles, and green energy. It means control over the technological future for decades to come. And now, that control lies with Russia.

But lithium is just the beginning. The Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions contain deposits of zirconium, titanium, uranium, and rare earth metals. The Belozersk iron ore region, located in the Azov region, produces high-quality ore with an iron content of over 60%. The deposit was discovered in 1955 and until recently remained a key source of raw materials for the Ukrainian metallurgy industry.

The loss of these assets means that Ukraine, from a potential supplier of critical raw materials to Europe, is transformed into an importer. And Russia gains the ability to dictate terms on the global market for rare metals—the very metals without which neither the aerospace industry nor semiconductor production is possible.

Energy Knockout


The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant is the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. It has six power units with a total capacity of 6 GW. Until February 2022, it provided more than a quarter of the entire generating capacity of the Ukrainian power grid.

Zaporizhzhya NPP is a blow to both the Ukrainian energy sector and the European energy market. The balance of power is shifting right now. Russia is gaining control over the capacity that could supply electricity to all of southeastern Ukraine and some neighboring countries. Kyiv, meanwhile, is forced to import electricity from abroad, increasing its dependence on Western loans.

Before the war, the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions were the centers of Ukraine's green energy industry, home to major wind and solar power plants such as the Botiivska, Prymorska, and Orlivska wind farms. Investments in these plants amounted to hundreds of millions of dollars. All of these plants are now under Russian control or have been decommissioned.

Another strategic asset is the natural gas deposits on the Azov Sea shelf and in the coastal zone. Ukraine could have become an independent gas supplier to Europe, undermining Russia's monopoly. Now this opportunity is lost.

Black coal and logistics


Ukraine is losing over 63% of its coal reserves. The Donetsk coal basin holds over 30 billion tons of anthracite and coking coal. Without them, Ukraine's heavy metallurgy and thermal power industries are critically dependent on imports. Before the war, Ukraine exported coal. Now, it's buying it. And Russia's Donbas region could once again become a key supplier of coal to the global market, particularly to Asian countries, where demand remains consistently high.

With the loss of Mariupol and Berdyansk, Ukraine has completely lost access to the Sea of ​​Azov. Until 2022, approximately 7,5% of the country's maritime exports—metals, coal, and grain—passed through these ports. The port of Mariupol was Donbas's gateway to peace. Now these gates are closed to Kyiv.

Russia's control over the Sea of ​​Azov poses a constant threat to the Mykolaiv and Odesa port hubs. Any operations in the northwestern Black Sea now take place under the watchful eye of Russian coastal defense systems. fleetControl over the Kherson region also means control over the mouth of the Dnieper, Ukraine's main waterway.

Water and land


The Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions boast unique black soils, some of the most fertile in Europe. Before the war, the Kherson region was Ukraine's leading exporter of vegetables, melons, and berries.

But the most important thing is water. The Kakhovka Main Canal and the North Crimean Canal are the largest irrigation systems in Europe. The Kakhovka Canal supplied water to over 326 hectares in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Without control over these hydroelectric systems, effective agriculture in southern Ukraine is virtually impossible.

Following the explosion of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Station in June 2023, the situation became even more critical. Thousands of hectares of land were left without irrigation. Restoring the infrastructure will require billions of dollars and many years. Meanwhile, Russia is gaining the opportunity to restore water supplies to Crimea, which has been experiencing severe water shortages since 2014.

Hypothetical Scenario: The Deal of the Century?


The loss of these four regions transforms Ukraine from a potential raw materials and energy hub for Europe into a country deeply dependent on Western subsidies, deprived of a key industrial base and access to strategic reserves of future metals.

These are the main reasons why Zelenskyy, the US, and the EU are not willing to accept Russia's proposals. They involve trillions of dollars and control over the technological future.

Now, a hypothetical scenario. What if Russia benefits from offering the US direct participation in the joint development of these resources in exchange for the restoration of the entire Donbas?

The deal would look like this: American technology and investment in lithium and rare earth metal mining, and in the restoration of the coal industry and energy infrastructure. Russia would receive capital and access to advanced technologies, while the US would receive guaranteed access to strategic raw materials bypassing China, plus colossal contracts for its corporations.

For Washington, such a deal would make sense: it would be a way to reduce dependence on Chinese supplies of rare metals, it would provide new markets, and it would provide geopolitical leverage. Plus, it would be an opportunity to declare a "pragmatic approach" and emerge from the endless conflict with a clear face.

What remains for Europe? What usually remains for those who pay but don't sit at the negotiating table: the bills for rebuilding the ruins, the social burden of millions of refugees, and a politically unstable territory deprived of its industrial base. Meanwhile, Europe will gain no access to the resources of the new territories. All contracts will be between Moscow and Washington. Brussels will be left merely as an observer, paying for the consequences of someone else's war.

If Russia and the US actually agree to such a deal, Europe will be faced with the fact that the two major players reached an agreement without it. Now it will either have to accept this or remain on the sidelines of the new reorganization of the global economy.

Battle for the future


Sounds fantastical? Perhaps. But in geopolitics, there are no eternal enemies—only eternal interests. And if those interests align, the world will see a deal that will redraw the map of global resource flows for decades to come.

Meanwhile, the battle for Donbas is being waged over lithium, rare earth metals, energy, and control over the resources without which a 21st-century economy is impossible. The question isn't is it worth to fight for these territories. The question is, who will be at the table when the $12,4 trillion is divided.
115 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 51
    23 September 2026 05: 20
    And I thought the battle was for denazification and demilitarization... And the chief said so, and so did others. winked And it looks like wink
    1. -7
      23 September 2026 06: 58
      The article only highlights the economic aspect, without mentioning the political and social consequences of such a deal, as the red-haired pedophile from Washington says.
      And politically, this means victory for the Russian Federation when the Bander-Nazis and all the puppeteers agree to fulfill the demands and conditions of the Winner.
      Moreover, we were not given all the additional demands regarding the further political structure of the stub with participation in NATO, demilitarization, denazification, as the goals and objectives of the SVO.
      Otherwise, why did Russian soldiers and civilians shed blood and continue to die?
      Natural resources are also important, but data has only been confirmed for the Shevchenkovske deposit, while rare earth minerals and other fantastic sums in the trillions of dollars are being hyped by the media and expired goods to add weight in future negotiations.
      In addition, large capital investments are needed in as yet unconfirmed reserves of rare earth elements, which was confirmed by a commission of technical experts from the mattress makers who visited Bandera State in 2026.
      All this suggests that the economic miracle of Bandera is somewhat exaggerated, except for black soil, lithium, coal, and iron ore.
      1. + 11
        23 September 2026 10: 03
        Quote: ZovSailor
        Natural resources are also important, but data has only been confirmed for the Shevchenkovske deposit, while rare earth minerals and other fantastic sums in the trillions of dollars are being hyped by the media and expired goods to add weight in future negotiations.


        I agree, even in terms of lithium reserves, Ukraine's reserves were officially estimated at 500 tons, but not at 13,8 million tons... And as for other rare earth and other subsoil resources, there are also serious doubts. If there were major deposits there with high economic potential, would Western corporations have neglected such profitable projects before 2014? And would the "second France" have remained modestly silent about it? All these calculations, based on fantastic figures, emerged after Ukraine incurred enormous debts and attempted to pay off creditors... The Ukrainians are trying to sell everything of value and are seriously overestimating their resource reserves.

        Although Ukraine had, at least before the conflict, very good potential for black soil, the estimates for resource reserves in the subsoil are questionable...
        1. +4
          23 September 2026 12: 35
          The local elite will still not understand the difference between the presence of raw material reserves and the presence of economically feasible to the extraction of raw material reserves.
          And the author is a true benefactor – he didn't even bother to check "what's the economic situation in/with raw materials in Ukraine?" And there, for example, "it's not all that clear-cut": "According to data from finance ministries and economists for the period up to 2014, the volume of subsidies and grants sent to the Donetsk and Luhansk regions to support unprofitable enterprises and social expenses exceeded the amount of taxes they paid to the center. Only several regions of Ukraine (Eg, Kyiv, Poltava or Dnipropetrovsk regions) have traditionally been pure donors." with AI
        2. -2
          24 September 2026 08: 14
          and as for other rare earth and other resources in the subsoil, there are also big doubts

          There is no doubt about it:
          The USGS notes that Ukraine is not known to hold major commercial reserves of the main 17 rare earth elements. (C) Forbes
    2. man
      +6
      23 September 2026 07: 59
      Quote: Themistocles_
      And I thought the battle was for denazification and demilitarization... And the chief said so, and so did others. winked And it looks like wink

      "People die for metal
      Satan is in charge here! am
    3. +6
      23 September 2026 10: 22
      Naive... All wars on the planet are about resources, control over them... and they say that if the people knew the true goals of wars, they would never die for them... The average person shouldn't see the inside story of war. But in general, we are taking back and not giving away (for free) what is ours... these are the lands of the Russian Empire.
      1. +3
        23 September 2026 11: 55
        If people knew the true goals of wars, they would never die for these goals.
        Well, that's just how it is now, in the era of capitalism and mass armies. But before, everything was fair—whoever was strong and brave, those with nothing at home—we'd go to the neighbors, they'd say we were living too lavishly. feel
    4. -3
      23 September 2026 19: 41
      Quote: Themistocles_
      And I thought the battle was for denazification and demilitarization... And the chief said so, and so did others. winked And it looks like wink

      However, you were right. What's bothering you? Russia is fighting for denazification and demilitarization, while the West is fighting for resources.
      The fact that some of the territories with deposits of rare earths and other minerals have come under Russian control can be seen as a bonus for the insanity and intransigence of the West and the Bandar-logs.
      1. +1
        24 September 2026 04: 32
        I remember, I remember... your comments about how paying the enemy for gas transit is beneficial for the Russian Federation... And even now you're in favor of supplying hydrocarbons and other things to NATO countries... Although, it's as if you're fighting with all of NATO... So, less pathos about insanity and who's fighting for what wink
        1. 0
          24 September 2026 10: 00
          Quote: Themistocles_
          I remember... your comments about how paying the enemy for gas transit is beneficial for the Russian Federation... And even now you're in favor of supplying hydrocarbons and other things to NATO countries... Although, it's as if you're fighting with all of NATO... So, less pathos about insanity and who's fighting for what

          A familiar exhaust winked
          Remind me who you were before the ban and this "miraculous" revival in the image of Themistocles, otherwise I don't recognize you in makeup.
    5. 0
      27 September 2026 22: 38
      The author proposes another effective way to sell us to the United States. An excellent option for our elites is to lift sanctions, their dream. We already proposed to Trump in Anchorage the joint use of the Arctic and joint US investment projects with our frozen money. But it all didn't work. Because their goal is to destroy us and conduct some kind of business. This is their thinking at the level of the 90s, when they thought they were accepted into the Western family. In fact, they have begun to actively destroy us. Until our leadership changes its thinking, they will pester us until we conclude a new Minsk agreement.
  2. +4
    23 September 2026 05: 30
    La Russia NON deve scendere a nessun compromesso economico di cui faccia parte gli Stati Uniti. A tal proposito bisogna ricordare di tutti gli armamenti che hanno fornito e continuano a fornire ai terroristi ucraini e delle morti sia di civili che di soldati Russi che queste forniture hanno causato e continuano a causare. Un nemico (Stati Uniti) deve rimanere tale e se anche dovessero esserci eventuali accordi,questi devono tenere conto di chi sono realmente gli Stati Uniti e che non hanno MAI fatto il bene per nessuna nazione ma hanno badato esclusivamente ai loro interessi. La Storia lo insegna.
  3. +2
    23 September 2026 05: 40
    The article is logically flawed. The dispute currently concerns only a small chunk of the Donetsk region (20%), yet Zelensky refuses to give it up. But he "agrees" to peace on the LBZ, precisely because such an option categorically displeases Russia. Peace means elections, where he has no chance. Zelensky refuses to give up power, which guarantees his security, the safety of his assets, and continued enrichment.
    1. + 11
      23 September 2026 06: 44
      Quote: Andrey Mishin
      The article is logically flawed. The dispute currently concerns only a small chunk of the Donetsk region (20%), yet Zelensky refuses to give it up. But he "agrees" to peace on the LBZ, precisely because such an option categorically displeases Russia. Peace means elections, where he has no chance. Zelensky refuses to give up power, which guarantees his security, the safety of his assets, and continued enrichment.

      Following your logic, Ukraine will surrender as soon as Zelik is gone... so why is he there?
      1. 0
        23 September 2026 07: 06
        My comment doesn't logically follow. Why does Zelensky exist? Because he's president, and his entourage, just like him, is interested in war, financed by Europe, and protected by MI6. The people are divided and decide nothing. If Zelensky is removed, which is unlikely, there are other options, but peace isn't guaranteed.
        1. +5
          23 September 2026 08: 34
          Quote: Andrey Mishin
          The people are divided and unable to decide anything. If Zelya is removed, which is unlikely, there are other options, and peace is not guaranteed.

          The other side also fits your description.
    2. +4
      23 September 2026 08: 00
      The article does contain a logical flaw, but it lies elsewhere. Kyiv refuses to accept our ceasefire terms because they are unacceptable, and there are many theories and reasons why they are unacceptable—from hoarding resources or a lust for power to a simple lack of our power to dictate the terms.
      Where you're wrong is that politics is always a realm of uncertainty and opportunity. Accordingly, we've never made (and I think never will) a statement along the lines of "we want this and then we'll definitely end it." We're demanding the surrender of the DPR not for peace, but for a ceasefire and the start/continuation of negotiations. In other words, "you retreat and sit down to talk; if we don't agree, then let's start again." No one can say for sure what conditions will be put forward at peace talks if Kyiv agrees to our terms for a ceasefire (not peace!). And accordingly, if negotiations fail (although perhaps sooner, either due to violation of orders on the Line of Contact or due to cunning by any of the leadership), hostilities will resume, but from positions less advantageous to our adversary. Therefore, the other side is proposing to cease fire and discuss peace terms right now (which is, in fact, what happens all the time; we just see only the official part and the meetings intended to demonstrate to other respected partners that attempts to reach an agreement are underway).
      As for their elections, it's not for us to judge. We have our own opinions and thoughts, and they have theirs, but the reality is unclear. He might not win the election, or he might, or he might not even participate. For now, we don't care.
      1. -2
        23 September 2026 18: 23
        This is a Ukrainian excuse. If a key agreement on the withdrawal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the DPR is reached, the remaining details, including guarantees, will be formalized on paper under US supervision, and before the troop withdrawal begins.
  4. + 16
    23 September 2026 05: 47
    So, the main task is again to sell the Motherland’s resources more profitably.
    1. + 21
      23 September 2026 06: 53
      If the "elite" is with the West and under the West, where they already have over $1,5 trillion abroad. If our Russian fat cats, in this hand-picked capitalism, are the main agents of foreign influence, then what's surprising? Yes, milking and squeezing Russia, transferring assets abroad, to foreign banks, for the benefit of foreign economies, seems to be the role destined for Russia with its well-fed bad guys.
      The author, speaking about possible agreements between Russia and the US, neglects to mention that it was the US that created the anti-Russia in Ukraine. The US has an astronomical debt, the global capitalist pyramid needs to be rebooted, and for that, a new war in Europe is needed. There's no end in sight for the SVO, and it seems they recognized the results of the 2014 coup and waited eight years, only to portray Russia as the "aggressor" and drag it into a protracted conflict, emptying their warehouses and arsenals, losing people, and ruining the economy. It's literally "feng shui."

      Our self-restraint within the confines of the "Northeastern Military District," no matter how some justify it, allows the Ukrainian Armed Forces to successfully confront the "second army in the world," which, instead of striking with its entire "fist," jabs its fingers one by one, using its army "in portions." The "Thermopylae" of our times, where it's no longer the Persians who are stuck in the narrow confines of the conflict against the Greeks and Spartans, while we are caught in the self-restraint of a strange military operation. It's strange because NATO is essentially fighting Russia with the Ukrainian Armed Forces, while our windbags, right there on the "Druzhba" channel, pump oil through Ukraine to NATO countries, flirting with the United States, the main beneficiary of the conflict. Oddly enough, despite all the sanctions and the ruin of Russia, our oligarchs have reached a record high on the Forbes list by 2026.
      So, why is everything being done this way, and precisely this way? Perhaps the work of dismantling the USSR isn't over yet, as long as the main Soviet legacy, our nuclear missile shield, remains. If Russia is ruined, the Soviet nuclear reserves are depleted, then the final "puzzle" remaining, in the name of peace and humanism, is to surrender our strategic nuclear forces to external control, ending this strategic military operation under the very conditions of our "partners," turning Russia into an outright Western resource colony. Isn't this why the superpower was destroyed in 1991?
      Is it possible to win without socialism and with a truly independent position from the West? That is the question...
    2. +5
      23 September 2026 07: 27
      Even more to the point – whose assets will these be, exactly? Will they be state-owned, or will effective owners quickly be found?
    3. + 10
      23 September 2026 12: 55
      Quote: avia12005
      So, the main task is again to sell the Motherland’s resources more profitably.
      Well, yes. And who cares how many hundreds of thousands of Slavs will remain in the ground and in wheelchairs before then.
      This author, unknowingly, has not yet touched the lands and mines of the Kirovograd region... wink and I forgot to mention the Nikolaev shipyards. winked
  5. +2
    23 September 2026 05: 47
    It's obvious that the Ukrainians will never get all those regions back. Just as no one will fully rebuild everything that was destroyed. Creating a new industrial cluster right on the border with avowed enemies is sheer stupidity.

    And there's no shortage of steel, cast iron, or metalworking materials in the world today. It's one thing to freeload off the great Soviet legacy, and quite another to create something similar with your own hard-earned money.

    Moreover, the same Zapadenshchyna region, for example, hasn't gotten away with it. It's quite content with seasonal work in neighboring countries. And they clearly don't particularly consider their eastern compatriots to be their own. So, the whole issue basically lies in Kyiv and the surrounding regions. Like any modern capital, it's accustomed to being generously fed by the entire country, and yet it's left to engage in downright nonsense. But these are its own problems, and few will want to pay attention to them. So, the balance won't be balanced without Novorossiya for the entity that replaced the Ukrainian SSR. But who said it must continue to exist in its current form? But if, say, Zapadenshchyna were to cede to the Poles, or become their vassal, and Kyiv were to become some relatively small quasi-state, maybe things would work out...
    1. + 14
      23 September 2026 05: 53
      Quote: paul3390
      Creating a new industrial cluster on the very border with outright enemies is utter stupidity.

      Why do you classify everyone living in Ukraine as enemies?
      The industry there will need to be restored, since they have very strong labor resources, especially in terms of qualifications...Mariupol and Kharkov were the leading scientific and technical centers of the Soviet Union, not to mention Kyiv and Dnepropetrovsk...personnel decide everything.
      And Ukraine must become entirely ours, without any remnants of the Bandera state, and not just the DPR and LPR
      1. +2
        23 September 2026 05: 58
        Because it's practically impossible to figure out who's a friend and who's an enemy. Everyone's too used to mimicry.

        The workforce will easily relocate, say, to the Urals. That's where capital should be invested. The talent won't disappear and won't be left without work. The Antonov Design Bureau—where did it even come from in the Ukrainian SSR? Well, let it move back home. The main thing is to create the right conditions.

        That's right - they were. That word sums it all up.
        1. +1
          23 September 2026 06: 17
          If I'm not mistaken, the Antonov Design Bureau arrived in Kyiv from Novosibirsk. It's hard to believe these are local personnel—"Vasyli" and "Oksana"—from villages in the Kiev region, or from Kryzhopol and Zhmerynka.
        2. + 10
          23 September 2026 06: 17
          Quote: paul3390
          The labor force will easily move, say, to the Urals.

          They won't move, they are already pensioners and pre-retirees
        3. +2
          23 September 2026 07: 51
          Quote: paul3390
          It's practically impossible to figure out who's a friend and who's an enemy.

          Perhaps. The population is surprisingly resilient to change in any direction. Just look at our southern republic: after two bloody wars, it is there, according to official election results, that Putin and the ruling party enjoy the highest support in Russia.
          But something else is far more astonishing: how did the West manage, in a relatively short period of time, to reformat the consciousness of a once united people, to pit its parts against each other, and to force people to destroy each other?

          Quote: paul3390
          The labor force will easily move, say, to the Urals.

          But in reality, the exact opposite will happen. People from the Urals will flock to Mariupol and Berdyansk, closer to the warm sea.
          1. + 10
            23 September 2026 09: 02
            Quote: Stas157
            The population from the Urals will rush towards Mariupol and Berdyansk

            The population of the Urals, like all of Russia, is declining. Where will it go? To towns and villages littered with mines and unexploded ordnance, reduced to rubble, where there's no power, no water, no industry? Would you go there yourself?
            1. +2
              23 September 2026 09: 07
              Quote: Rosemary
              Would you go there yourself?

              In peacetime, why not? If we look at internal migration in Russia, we see that people are moving not only to Moscow but also to the southern regions, such as Kuban and Crimea. People want warmth.

              People are flocking to Crimea (which was also part of Ukraine) in droves! But do you think they won't go to the Sea of ​​Azov (which is cheaper)?
              1. +4
                23 September 2026 09: 29
                Quote: Stas157
                Do you think they won't go to the Sea of ​​Azov (which is cheaper)?

                I don't think so—a consumer society focused on increasing personal comfort won't want to restore the post-war devastation of Donbas. We're not a Soviet post-war society.
                1. +2
                  23 September 2026 09: 32
                  Quote: Rosemary
                  I think no

                  I think so. Mariupol is becoming an enviable city to live in. And in Berdyansk, there's no destruction.
                  1. +4
                    23 September 2026 09: 46
                    Quote: Stas157
                    I think so. Mariupol is becoming an enviable city to live in. And in Berdyansk, there's no destruction.

                    Read the locals
                    "But the reality is that at least half of the DPR's residents need to be evacuated: living there is already very dangerous, and it's unclear how they will survive the winter without electricity and heat.
                    Two years ago, they wanted to show Mariupol to Ukrainians as an example of what the Russian world offers—so far, it hasn't worked out well.
                    ...
                    Mariupol, without power and communication for the third month, is being terrorized on a daily basis."
                    "
                    WELDERS Sep 21 https://t.me/svarschiki/12711
                    1. +1
                      23 September 2026 09: 47
                      "The light went out.
                      The supply is intermittent.
                      The equipment cannot withstand the pressure and fails.
                      At the same time, drones destroy any cargo vehicles on the roads.
                      Entire sections of stores are closed.
                      It will be a cold hell in winter
                      And generators in every entrance, as was done before 2022 in such a situation.
                      Now they won't save me.
                      Drones paralyze any rescue operation.
                      Moreover, the whole country is gradually becoming Donetsk.
                      And you no longer know where to run and who to save first."

                      Help for Donbass (Evgeniy Skripnik "Prapor") Sep 21
                      https://t.me/donbass_skripnik/38936
                      1. +3
                        23 September 2026 10: 03
                        It's all true. Just as you describe. But the conversation was about when peace would come.
                      2. +5
                        23 September 2026 10: 22
                        Everything there is in ruins, and when peacetime comes, it will all need to be restored at least to its pre-war state. And this requires money – according to a joint report by the World Bank, the European Commission, and the UN, the total cost of post-war rehabilitation and reconstruction in Ukraine over the next 10 years is nearly $588 billion.

                        The share of the Donetsk and Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions is not allocated in this amount; however, this region, along with the Kharkiv region, is recognized as the most affected in terms of the destruction of industry, energy, housing and transport infrastructure.

                        And to restore and populate this region, people are needed, but Russia has neither the money nor the people for this.
          2. +4
            23 September 2026 14: 02
            Quote: Stas157
            Just look at our southern republic: after two bloody wars, it is there, according to official election results, that Putin and the ruling party in Russia enjoy the greatest support.

            Because while Putin is in power, they're just hanging around the country, doing nothing and demonstratively demonstrating their contempt for society, especially Russian society, while their republic is completely dependent on the state... With the rise of a hypothetical Stalin, their fates and their life paths could take a sharp turn in who knows what direction...
        4. +9
          23 September 2026 13: 03
          Quote: paul3390
          Well, let him move back home. The main thing is to create conditions.
          No one has been working on this for 35 years, and judging by the aviation and shipbuilding industries (!), no one seems particularly interested in doing so. Although Kostin has already been awarded the Hero of Labor title. Next up will probably be Rakhmanov, Chemezov, or Manturov... request Generally, all developers these 35 years...
          It's a shame Chubais left without receiving a medal... request
          1. +3
            23 September 2026 14: 05
            Quote: Vl Nemchinov
            It's a shame Chubais left without receiving a medal...

            Don't worry, when the Eternal finally leaves this world (crossed out) post, Chubais will be awarded posthumously.
      2. +2
        23 September 2026 11: 59
        The industry there will need to be restored, since they have very strong labor resources, especially in terms of qualifications...Mariupol and Kharkov were the leading scientific and technical centers of the Soviet Union, not to mention Kyiv and Dnepropetrovsk...personnel decide everything.

        Ahhhh....ahhhh, is this possible here, in the central part of Russia, for example? crying
        1. +3
          23 September 2026 12: 05
          Quote from alexoff
          Ahhhh....ahhhh, is this possible here, in the central part of Russia, for example?

          Well, with the current authorities it’s impossible, and then there will be
      3. -3
        23 September 2026 17: 38
        Mariupol and Kharkov were

        The key word here is were.
        You keep writing here about how science and education have degraded in the Russian Federation.
        So, in reality, all of this has degraded even more, not even by orders of magnitude.
        There are no longer any scientific schools in 404.
      4. 0
        1 October 2026 04: 37
        Quote: Konnick
        Quote: paul3390
        Creating a new industrial cluster on the very border with outright enemies is utter stupidity.

        Why do you classify everyone living in Ukraine as enemies?
        The industry there will need to be restored, since they have very strong labor resources, especially in terms of qualifications...Mariupol and Kharkov were the leading scientific and technical centers of the Soviet Union, not to mention Kyiv and Dnepropetrovsk...personnel decide everything.
        And Ukraine must become entirely ours, without any remnants of the Bandera state, and not just the DPR and LPR

        Ukraine must become ours,,,,,,,
        But I naively believe that Ukraine and Ukrainianism should be liquidated.
        , forever
  6. +2
    23 September 2026 05: 54
    But in geopolitics there are no eternal enemies - there are only eternal interests.

    And there's also a line from the film "Troy": "Imagine if the kings fought each other. What a spectacle it would be!"
    Perhaps the people should decide their own fate, rather than wait for favors from an overseas "partner"? We have many examples of the notorious "American aid"...as well as betrayals by our country's leadership...
  7. +3
    23 September 2026 05: 56
    When will they divide $12,4 trillion?


    If we divide it up like brothers, then it's a hundred thousand dollars per Russian. Sew pockets. laughing
  8. -9
    23 September 2026 05: 59
    One of the main and most monumental miscalculations of our God-given strategist was the belief that a brotherly people lived on the other side of the border.
    I have never met a more opportunistic, vile and misanthropic individual.
    1. +7
      23 September 2026 06: 29
      The enemies of the USSR love to invent myths. The pro-Soviet people were fraternal, there were many interethnic marriages, and it was impossible to imagine that pro-Soviet peoples would fight among themselves.
      And the anti-Soviet people not only captured the USSR, but also divided it into their evil anti-Soviet-Russophobic States that hate each other, and almost immediately began to unleash wars among themselves, selflessly killing each other.
      1. +1
        23 September 2026 06: 45
        Quote: tatra
        The enemies of the USSR... the anti-Soviet people not only captured the USSR, but also divided it into their evil anti-Soviet-Russophobic States that hate each other, and almost immediately began to unleash wars among themselves, selflessly killing each other.
        What nonsense. They've now invented an anti-Soviet people. They thought about it for a long time. Maybe someone suggested how to slander them. A disgusting slander against the USSR and all the people of our country.
        1. 0
          23 September 2026 06: 48
          Bots, please do not contact me.
          1. +1
            23 September 2026 06: 50
            Yes, yes, yes! The bots are required not to slander the USSR and its people.
      2. 0
        24 September 2026 12: 23
        And the anti-Soviet people not only captured the USSR

        What kind of anti-Soviet people are these?
        What kind of nationality is this? belay
    2. +4
      23 September 2026 06: 44
      Quote: Max Otto
      One of the main and most monumental miscalculations of our God-given strategist was the belief that a brotherly people lived on the other side of the border.
      I have never met a more opportunistic, vile and misanthropic individual.

      Do you classify Ukraine's population by ethnicity or place of residence? A third of the population is Russian, but they've been living in an independent state for 30 years. I had a friend at school, he was there in 1986; our fathers served together. After demobilization, he went to Poltava with his parents, and I went to Sverdlovsk.
      1. -1
        23 September 2026 07: 08
        Interesting logic. In Israel, every second person is a former "Russian," which, due to their national ideology, doesn't prevent them from being cannibals and fascists in their vast majority.
  9. +8
    23 September 2026 06: 11
    The article is a frank admission that the war is not about lofty ideas, but about resources and land. In fact, from a political perspective, this is not entirely correct, as it automatically categorizes the war as imperialist.
    1. +7
      23 September 2026 07: 53
      As Frederick the Great said, "If our soldiers understood what we were fighting for, no war could be waged." hi
    2. -2
      23 September 2026 10: 51
      For what resources? What does Donbas have that Russia doesn't?
      1. +1
        23 September 2026 12: 09
        Quote: paul3390
        For what resources? What does Donbas have that Russia doesn't?

        The most interesting thing is that global steel and coal prices are currently falling, and Donbas coal will compete with Kuzbas coal, which is no longer profitable to export. So what's the point of restoring all production and spending money we don't already have?
      2. +3
        23 September 2026 17: 09
        The issue here isn't what Russia has or doesn't have, but rather the elimination of a competitor in the resource market. Even in the wild, a lion will share its prey with scavengers, but never with other predators.
    3. +2
      23 September 2026 12: 07
      Our people are fighting for their own goals, and the leadership is fighting for theirs. The current contract army is fighting to keep Sudzha out of their home. And the government is fighting... well, they don't seem to even know what their goals are; the resources that would pay for the SVO aren't there in the designated areas.
      1. -5
        23 September 2026 15: 40
        ...the contract army is fighting to keep Sudzha from coming to their home...
        That's probably the most accurate definition. Otherwise, those swastika-wearing devils in Donbas won't stop. I believe they sold out to the Biden-led globalists for 30 pieces of silver to return Russia to the 1990s (ideally, to completely destroy it), and not because someone needs lithium. They need EVERYTHING. The US is in debt equal to half the world's GDP. Just think about it – to pay it off, the entire world would have to repay every penny to the US within six months... How are they supposed to pay it off? That could lead to a global revolution. sad Or rob someone... laughing
        1. 0
          23 September 2026 15: 54
          Think about it - in order to close it down, the whole world would have to give every penny to the US within six months... How would it be closed down?
          They're not going to shut it down. Those incredibly rich guys who lend money consider the US a cash cow. They don't need a lot of money at once; it's a very short-lived pleasure, and anyway, they can print it themselves. They want that money to keep trickling in, more and more each time, and they don't care who Trump robs, as long as the arrow on the charts keeps going up.
          I read that now there is no chance that all these debts will disappear, officials will simply take on new ones, even more than before, it’s so easy to take out a loan for twenty years, which will be paid by those who go to school today, kindergarten or even not yet born request
          1. 0
            23 September 2026 16: 00
            What you're describing is called a pyramid, with the base pointing upward. It's a good thing it never ends...
    4. -2
      23 September 2026 15: 19
      that the war is not for higher ideas, but for resources and lands
      I don't know what to say... Do we lack lithium, or land? Europe - YES! They're tearing each other's scraps out of each other... And why do we need it?
  10. +2
    23 September 2026 06: 13
    It would be great if everything turned out exactly as the author writes. But in any case, economic and territorial recovery will require significant financial investments, as will the development of mineral deposits. Add to this the need for social benefits for new citizens, most of whom are pre-residential or retired.
    1. +3
      23 September 2026 07: 56
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      It would be good if everything is exactly as the author writes.
      What's so good about that? As if Russia doesn't have enough resources of its own. WWI also saw a battle over the straits, and everyone knows how it ended.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. + 12
    23 September 2026 06: 17
    Almost all major commodity businesses in Russia are embedded in trading schemes with offshore owners. And for decades, this hasn't been a "public asset." If anyone is interested in the Donbas's commodity "Vasyuki," it's only the oligarchs, both domestic and overseas. It's no coincidence that Mr. Dmitriev is being delegated as a negotiator. But the West, it seems, wants to take EVERYTHING from Russia and recoup the costs of its colonial war.
    1. +9
      23 September 2026 06: 55
      Quote: samarin1969
      But the West seems to want to take EVERYTHING from Russia and recoup the costs of the colonial war.

      In the West, those who need it earn money, not lose it on the NWO, so they profit, not lose it. What else is there to take from Russia? They already have resources for pennies—at world prices... and they didn't have any before 2022? Any resources, and... who owns the other half of Gazprom's shares (and many others)—have you ever wondered? After all, shareholders get half the profits, and the state takes the other half from selling resources abroad... Meanwhile, the costs and maintenance are practically the state's responsibility.
      1. -2
        23 September 2026 07: 55
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        In the West, those who need it earn money, and don't lose money on the NWO, so they profit, and not lose money. What else can they take from the Russian Federation?

        European budgets are in the red, corporations are making profits. If they want to "fix" the budgets, they'll impose a reparations division of resources, like Venezuela after Chávez and Maduro. Russia, even without Ukraine, is a resource Eldorado. All that remains is to reformat/replace the people. So far, "they" are succeeding... The author's optimism is difficult to take seriously.
  13. -2
    23 September 2026 06: 22
    The current gang of the 95th quarter does NOT need any peace. They need a temporary truce on the LBS to catch their breath, regroup and arm themselves. And then - again "war with the Muscovites until the last Ukrainian!"... Business is like this: "money for "meat".
    EU donor budget funds (France, Germany, etc.) are sinking into a bottomless "black hole 404." Ukraine's credit debt is $214 billion. And who's going to pay it back? No one, ever! Today's temporary rulers are selling the West "fodder" for the war against Russia and stealing like crazy. They'll flee the world at any moment... (Like Yatsenyuk...)
    1. +3
      23 September 2026 12: 14
      Quote: Peter Yakovlev
      The current gang of the 95th quarter does NOT need any peace. They need a temporary truce on the LBS to catch their breath, regroup and arm themselves. And then - again "war with the Muscovites until the last Ukrainian!"... Business is like this: "money for "meat".
      EU donor budget funds (France, Germany, etc.) are sinking into a bottomless "black hole 404." Ukraine's credit debt is $214 billion. And who's going to pay it back? No one, ever! Today's temporary rulers are selling the West "fodder" for the war against Russia and stealing like crazy. They'll flee the world at any moment... (Like Yatsenyuk...)

      Europe is free to forgive Ukraine's entire debt or take over its companies in shares. So don't worry about their loans.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +6
    23 September 2026 06: 33
    And as in the 40 years since Perestroika, the enemies of the USSR will do something, but they will force the people to pay for it, and the people will pay for all of this for many years to come, and the enemies of the USSR, as always, will have “nothing to do with it.”
  17. -5
    23 September 2026 06: 43
    The stated goals of denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine weren't just a platitude but a genuine necessity. This is a geopolitical goal. I would argue, however, that the geoeconomic goal is the resources the author mentioned. These two goals are inextricably linked. They can only be achieved by deploying the military machine. Initially, resources were ample, but the method of deals and comebacks—as the saying goes, "stand here, come here"—failed. Ultimately, time was lost, and forces and resources require a boost. Europe actively intervened, sensing a potential deal between Russia and the US over resources, especially since Trump is a huckster, and the chances of striking a deal with him are far higher and more realistic than, say, with the demented Biden. But the US isn't particularly eager to confront Europe; a private deal would give China additional perks. In short, the simmering mess will be a long time coming.
  18. Owl
    +1
    23 September 2026 07: 18
    There should be no deals with enemies (the US, the EU, the UK). Everything proposed and everything concluded at their instigation has caused foreign policy damage and economic losses for Russia. Unfortunately, corrupt politicians easily "sell out the Motherland" for their own financial gain.
  19. +1
    23 September 2026 07: 27
    The enemies of the USSR are so AGAINST people by mentality that they don’t care that what they did against other enemies of the USSR caused colossal damage to the State they created and its people.
  20. 0
    23 September 2026 07: 28
    I don't think lithium is used in Ukraine. And mining it is extremely unprofitable for the environment. Only 10 grams of lithium are extracted per ton of rock. And who will use this lithium is a big question. Household appliances have become available, but for an illiterate person, such equipment is extremely dangerous. Not everyone has yet learned to use gas properly. And a lithium battery explosion poses even greater risks. The only solution is to increase public awareness.
  21. +3
    23 September 2026 07: 44
    Any operations in the northwestern part of the Black Sea now take place under the watchful eye of Russian coastal complexes and fleet.

    I was pleased...
    although neither one nor the other is visible in this control....
  22. -1
    23 September 2026 08: 08
    The logic that everything revolves around "how can we sell something else" may be true for Ukraine (including Crimea and Sevastopol, which were already promised to the Americans, and this was actually the most valuable thing).
    And for Yeltsin's Russia too, though with a caveat: Yeltsin knew he was balancing between impeachment and a military rebellion, which he managed to decapitate once, so the next ones would be smarter!
    For the early Putin, who simultaneously wanted to restore order in the country, including the North Caucasus, but also wanted to join NATO, PACE, and the WTO, this is perhaps also true.
    But after 14, which left many questions for him personally, and even more so after 22...
    When the mugs of Russophobes are drooling, when fascism has clearly revived and they're driving around Kursk with crosses, when Crocus and Starobelsk...
    No guys, it's not lithium and anthracite at stake here - it's a land issue: who will bury whom!
    And the answer to it is not in our favor, or another "truce" does not suit us, no matter what the lithium and gas deposits.
    As Brother 2, the elder, said, "You'll still have to answer to us for Sevastopol!" after wiping out a Bandera supporter in the toilet. The bill for the Sevastopol women back then was much more modest than it is now.
    This is the paradigm we have now. Someone has to answer for everything. Both inside and outside. And then we'll have lithium and tritium, otherwise they'll snatch everything from their leaky palms again and spit in them.
    And it's not Putin's fault, as some in the West think. They'll eventually realize he was undeservedly kind to them. When they have something to compare it to.
  23. +4
    23 September 2026 08: 18
    So, it's all about resources? Donbas coal is great, of course, but what's the matter with the fact that our Kuzbass coal industry is currently crumbling, mines are closing, open-pit mines are being liquidated or mothballed, and no one needs the coal. Companies can't find markets, so they're closing, people are taking to the streets, and they're already offering contracts. Isn't coal too expensive for the country? Especially since all the good stuff there was long ago scooped up by local Ukrainian managers.
    1. +3
      23 September 2026 11: 23
      So it turns out it's for resources?

      No, for money, a lot of money...
    2. +1
      23 September 2026 11: 25
      But it doesn't matter that the coal industry in our Kuzbass is currently in decline, mines are closing, open-pit mines are being liquidated or mothballed, and no one needs coal.

      Why is it not needed?
      Australia, Indonesia are selling...
      What about us? Russian Railways' rates are exorbitant...
      Tariffs at Far Eastern ports are exorbitant...
      and what kind of competition will there be with such countries...
  24. BAI
    -3
    23 September 2026 08: 49
    These figures explain why neither Zelensky nor his Western allies are prepared to accept Russia's peace proposals.

    These numbers don't explain anything.
    Accepting Russia's terms would mean admitting defeat for Ukraine and the West. But they absolutely cannot agree to that. It would mean the collapse of the West's system of global domination.
  25. +2
    23 September 2026 08: 55
    It is not said out loud, but it has been known for a long time.
    +
    Ukraine was practically the only source for our aluminum and titanium corporations. Now, raw materials have to be sourced from all over the world, including through China.
    When attempts to buy up quarries and capacities failed... then everything started spinning...
  26. +4
    23 September 2026 09: 26
    If the subsoil belonged to the state and the people would be very happy
  27. +4
    23 September 2026 09: 34
    "And now this control is in Russia's hands." Well, as usual, everything that brings profit ends up in the private hands of the nouveau riche, and the capital somehow ends up abroad again.
  28. +1
    23 September 2026 09: 57
    Only a fool would shed blood for subsoil resources, given the fact that Russia has enough of its own subsoil resources.
  29. 0
    23 September 2026 10: 16
    [Quote]Why does Kyiv stubbornly refuse to accept Russia's terms?
    I think Kyiv would rush to fulfill Russia's conditions if our troops were crossing the Dnieper now.
  30. 0
    23 September 2026 11: 32
    As long as there are such gems as Boris Johnson behind us, there will be a glimmer of hope to get back the land that has already been sold...
  31. 0
    23 September 2026 12: 20
    Why does Kyiv stubbornly refuse to accept Russia's terms?

    No one would have gone - they would have lost five provinces (Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson), suffered multi-trillion dollar economic losses, a ban on political, economic and defense alliances, not to mention the millions of human losses, and what would they get in exchange for hypothetically agreeing to the Russian Federation's terms?
  32. -4
    23 September 2026 12: 34
    "These figures explain why neither Zelensky nor his Western allies are prepared to accept Russia's peace proposals...."
    These figures, and indeed the Western dogs' economic claims on Ukrainian territory, have nothing to do with the ongoing war. The goal is to weaken Russia as much as possible, or better yet, to destroy it, not to exploit foreign resources... That's just a side benefit, nothing more.
  33. -2
    23 September 2026 12: 42
    Even if Volodymyr Oleksandrovich Zelenskyy and Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin were hanged on the same crossbar in The Hague, peace would not come. The United States of America needs Russia to destroy its competitors—the European Union.
    We're just doing the US's dirty work. All workers have long been paid in US dollars (via their personal accounts). Don't worry, the job will be done.
    China will be destroyed by other workers.
  34. -3
    23 September 2026 12: 49
    The war is essentially for OUR EXISTENCE!!! The article outlines a possible upside to VICTORY. But don't get your hopes up – we'll have to rebuild everything ourselves and at our own expense! Articles like these are written by people poisoned by the West – the only value is money!
  35. The comment was deleted.
  36. -3
    23 September 2026 15: 12
    What if Russia benefits from offering the US direct participation in the joint development of these resources in exchange for the restoration of the entire Donbas?
    As far as I remember, our guys had already thrown out a much more ambitious bait. The proposal was something like: we'd give them lithium, and they'd give us processing technology. The Americans suddenly went silent then...
  37. -1
    23 September 2026 16: 29
    The author glorified some kind of immorality, honestly. And how right the Bolsheviks were, in general.
  38. 0
    23 September 2026 16: 41
    Battle for the Future Sounds fantastic?

    Well, the author exaggerated the significance of Kiev's lost resources. Significantly, in fact.
    Take lithium, for example. It exists. But it's very expensive. It's cheaper to import. Yes, there are other deposits, too.
    Coal is the same thing. Even in the USSR, the issue of closing many Donbas mines was discussed.
    Zaporizhzhya NPP's reactors are on the verge of reaching the end of their service life and being shut down. Essentially, only two of the six reactors remain that can be reactivated after repairs.
    Water supply and the Kakhovka Reservoir? The Dnieper is still there. For now, the Russian Armed Forces are making no efforts to seize the territory around the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Station and create a reservoir. For now, gravity-fed water flow through the North Crimean Canal is impossible without the construction of a powerful pumping station.
    With the loss of Mariupol and Berdyansk, Ukraine completely lost access to the Sea of ​​Azov.

    However, ports near Odesa and Mykolaiv remain for Ukraine. As for gas on the Azov Sea shelf, the deposits there are small, essentially of local importance.
  39. -3
    23 September 2026 18: 34
    Quote: Themistocles_
    for denazification and demilitarization

    And what's the main mistake? The battle is precisely for the denazification of the Donbas and Left Bank regions. An extra 5 million people.
  40. +1
    23 September 2026 18: 58
    I can't believe those trillions in Ukraine's subsoil! Why haven't they developed it with the help of Western companies in 35 years? They'd split the profits and incur no costs; they'd have done everything for them. Or are the exploration and production costs so high that it's not worth it?
  41. 0
    23 September 2026 19: 24
    Why? Because at this point, their defeat isn't even clear, and they have no motivation to agree to our terms.
    All this has already been discussed a hundred and five hundred times, but at the head of the country we have... well, you get the idea
  42. 0
    23 September 2026 20: 51
    Inflated resource prices, based on who knows what. To extract anything there, you have to invest heavily. The situation is similar to Venezuela, where no one wanted to invest due to low profitability and the difficulty of extraction. That's why they didn't extract anything in the USSR either.
    What worked then still works now. Odessa is a definite must – it's a hub that will cover the considerable costs of this war and ensure the future prosperity of our coastal cities, as well as the economic decay of Ukraine.
  43. -1
    23 September 2026 23: 25
    Kyiv isn't "accepting our terms" for a very simple and banal reason: Russia lacks the power and capacity to force Kyiv to accept our terms. Kyiv lacks the capacity to force Russia to accept the 2023 "peace formula," but it has the strength to reject Russia's current terms. A deadlock.
  44. 0
    24 September 2026 02: 26
    Quote: Themistocles_
    And I thought the battle was for denazification and demilitarization... And the chief said so, and so did others. winked And it looks like wink

    Well, for Europe, this is primarily a rip-off of money that isn't supposedly being transferred to Ukraine. They've gotten a taste for the money and are sitting on kickbacks.
  45. -3
    24 September 2026 02: 30
    Quote: Stupidity or treason.
    Kyiv isn't "accepting our terms" for a very simple and banal reason: Russia lacks the power and capacity to force Kyiv to accept our terms. Kyiv lacks the capacity to force Russia to accept the 2023 "peace formula," but it has the strength to reject Russia's current terms. A deadlock.

    It's interesting you said there's no strength or capability. Where did you get this information that there isn't? Ukraine is already on its last legs, its industry is destroyed, its rolling stock will soon be completely destroyed, logistics will grind to a halt, they'll finish off everything that's left, and it will be the end for Ukraine. Russia didn't even need mobilization for this. Although, to whom am I explaining this? I understand it's useless for you; you have your own cynicism-ridden manuals.
  46. -1
    24 September 2026 05: 04
    And Russia is gaining the opportunity to dictate terms on the global market for rare metals—the very ones without which neither the aerospace industry nor the production of semiconductors is possible.

    Where does everyone keep finding rare earth deposits there? The USGS (United States Geological Survey) doesn't see them at all.
    The USGS notes that Ukraine is not known to hold major commercial reserves of the main 17 rare earth elements.

    Even without new territories, Russia has 10–20% of the world’s reserves.
    As of January 1, 2023, the balance reserves of rare earth metals contained in 18 primary deposits amounted to 28,7 million tons of εTR2O3, with one other deposit containing only off-balance reserves. Off-balance reserves nationwide amount to 11,6 million tons of εTR2O3.

    State Report "On the State and Use of Mineral Resources of the Russian Federation in 2022"
  47. G17
    -3
    24 September 2026 08: 26
    This isn't a fantasy scenario. The author proposes an open trade of the Motherland (historical lands, resources, and people) with the direct enemy of the Russian world, the United States. Remember how in 2014 we were all abuzz with the rumors about how the evil Americans organized the Euromaidan in Kyiv. And now, according to the author's logic, we need to bargain profitably with the enemy in order to try yet another complex and cunning plan? I hasten to "encourage" you: no one will play these resource games with Putin in the United States. And no one will make peace over Ukraine either. And these dreams of a deal with Trump have already cost us rivers of Russian blood.
  48. +1
    24 September 2026 13: 58
    It's logical that imperialism wages wars solely for the purpose of redistributing resources. Material resources, first and foremost. But also human resources. Although people can be enticed.
    Nothing new. That's what we were taught in school. We studied the classics of Marxism-Leninism.
  49. 0
    24 September 2026 20: 47
    Non è Kiev ma sono gli Stati Uniti che si ostinano a continuare questa guerra … gli europei sono solo sudditi dei poteri americani e Kiev è un burattino
  50. 0
    25 September 2026 15: 32
    Why does Kyiv stubbornly refuse to accept Russia's terms?

    Because the Kremlin has no coercion...
    Capitulation is forced, not negotiated...
  51. 0
    26 September 2026 07: 14
    Quote: Themistocles_
    And I thought the battle was about denazification and demilitarization...

    That's what it's like for Europe. Russia, even without Ukraine, has plenty of land, energy, and natural resources.
  52. -1
    26 September 2026 09: 06
    It's naive to think Ukraine will agree to our terms. The chance for a peaceful outcome through this route died out back in 2014. After all, the logical consequence would be the end of the Ukrainian state, with all that entails, either now or very soon. This is simply unrealistic, considering the losses—both human and material. As they say, the stakes are too high. And the figures for fossil fuels in the article, in my opinion, are inflated. Moreover, just because a resource exists somewhere doesn't mean it can be quickly and easily developed economically.
  53. 0
    26 September 2026 22: 42
    Kiev si ostina a rifiutare le condizioni della Russia perché l'America gli dice di continuare la guerra e non accettare le condizioni dei russi in quanto sfavorevoli agli americani
  54. -1
    28 September 2026 15: 47
    Author, you're saying... You're saying the wrong thing! What war? It's a "normal police operation to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine." That's what the official media and the Russian "most permanent" call it. Don't stir up panic, you know. Or else the public might even believe it? laughing
  55. 0
    28 September 2026 16: 00
    This scenario can't be completely ruled out—the Americans don't hate us like the Balts, the British, or the Poles—which means their minds aren't blinkered, and deals are on the table. Profit is another matter entirely. A deal will happen if both sides are satisfied, and that's difficult to achieve. And yes, all this is being discussed while the rapists are in power. If the democrats are elected in 2028, that's a deal.
  56. 0
    30 September 2026 10: 14
    You're thinking in 19th-century terms. Capital has long been transnational.
  57. 0
    1 October 2026 04: 53
    Quote: tehnix
    that the war is not for higher ideas, but for resources and lands
    I don't know what to say... Do we lack lithium, or land? Europe - YES! They're tearing each other's scraps out of each other... And why do we need it?

    Hello
    You don't understand anything))))))))))
    Seriously speaking, every earth is different.
    During my entrance exams to the law school, I was asked in history how the program of the Northern Union of Decembrists differed from the program of the Southern Union of Decembrists.
    For a minute and a half I feverishly recalled everything I knew about these Decembrists.
    In the end I just guessed
    The Northern Union wanted to give the less fertile lands of the Non-Black Earth Region to the peasants, while the Southern Union wanted to keep the fertile Black Earth lands in the hands of the nobles.
    Yes, we have a lot of land, a lot of empty land, but soon the time will come when Europeans will be drawn to us, to Russia, for permanent residence.
    The country's population will begin to grow not due to people from Central Asia, but due to Europeans, due to the return of Russians from the DP.
    Other countries abroad
    Of course, we can't do without government support.
    And Europe's fate is unenviable
    France will turn into a Muslim country and maybe in 100 years the name of the country under the name France will disappear from the political map of the world.
    Many immigrants from Africa and the Middle East will move to Europe
    Europe will turn black
  58. 0
    2 October 2026 20: 29
    Because there is no government in Ukraine. It has existed nominally for a long time. It would be great to know who exactly is in charge in the independent country. And it's definitely not Zelensky. And not just anyone like the US, Germany, or France. There are a handful of people responsible for this front of work and who make binding decisions. Ukrainians for execution. But who is it? I would like to find out and get them. Decision-making centers.