Inside the cruiser!

8 955 64
Inside the cruiser!
Mikhail Kutuzov in 2005


The course to the deserted shore,
The heart of the ship beats.
I remember my beloved
At the obedient helm.
Full speed ahead, we're flying like an arrow!
Cheerful, strong, robust,
Ready to fight for the country
Komsomol sailors!
We have fought bravely many times,
Accepting the challenge to fight
And they returned victorious
To the quiet harbor, home




FLOW, SONG, IN THE SPACE. Song from the film "The Seven Brave" (1936).
Music by V. Pushkov, Words by A. Apsolon


Museum ships. So, last time we visited the cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov and saw what's up there, so to speak. Inside, we only explored the turrets and underneath them. Today, our journey takes us "inside" the ship. We'll explore its living quarters, peek into the wardroom, the galley (how could it be without one?!), and, most interestingly, visit its "heart"—the powerful propulsion system.

But first, let's remember once again that the Mikhail Kutuzov is currently based in the port of Novorossiysk and is a museum ship. The ship is impressively large, appearing like a giant even against the backdrop of the mountains. The distance between the highest and lowest points of the ship—the masthead and the keel—is 59 meters. Both anchors, weighing 7 tons each, are submerged and therefore invisible. But even the anchor chains themselves, weighing 30 tons each, are quite impressive. Since we didn't get to see them last time, we'll begin our photo gallery with them today.


The anchor chain. It must have been incredibly strong if it could hold a ship like the Mikhail Kutuzov…


The anchor hawse. As Nikolai, the "old sea dog" who showed me around the ship, told me, a specially assigned sailor wielding a fire hose had to spray water on this area when the anchor was raised. And in the summer, everything was fine! But what was it like in the winter, in the freezing cold and the icy wind, especially on the icy deck?

Last time, one of our VO readers lamented that the deck planking on both the poop and forecastle was missing. Well, nothing lasts forever. It's good that we at least have this monument!


Ship's anchor!!!

Let's start with the fact that the ship had 2500 rooms, including 72 cabins, 38 crew quarters, and even four libraries. Tours were usually taken to the officers' mess hall, which served as a dining room, as well as a meeting room and a space for various celebrations. The cruiser had two of these: one for officers and one for midshipmen. The custom was to address each other by their first names and patronymics, without regard for rank. Only the 72 officers and four or five orderlies on duty, manning the buffet, were allowed into this abode of naval tradition.

I immediately imagined how difficult it would have been for me if I'd ended up in that group as an officer: due to some peculiarity of my brain, I can't remember first and middle names. Years can pass before I even remember anyone. I don't even remember the names of my department colleagues, even though I've worked with them for many years. And here... 72 people!

By the way, smoking here was allowed without the ship's commander's permission, but only from 18:00 PM to 22:00 PM. It's interesting that the tradition of having a wardroom for officers on a ship came to us from the English sailing fleetOfficers came to meals in their everyday uniforms, but for Sunday dinners they had to wear their dress uniforms. Each officer had his own seat, and no one else could sit there. This was considered very bad manners. Arriving later than the senior assistant was also unacceptable. In Sobolev's "Major Repairs" (Book 1), one such lateness has a very serious justification!


The previous article failed to mention that during the last modernization, the Mikhail Kutuzov was equipped with eight 30mm AK-230 anti-aircraft guns with automatic radar guidance—one of the first Soviet high-rate-of-fire anti-aircraft guns. Four were located on the platform above the bridge, and four on the platform behind the first funnel. The guns boasted high speed and aiming angles, as well as a truly insane rate of fire—1000 rounds per minute. Even one such gun was enough to literally shred any enemy boat or aircraft.

Again, the tablecloths were placed slightly damp to prevent the dishes from shifting during the seas. Specially commissioned sets were used for meals: one formal and a couple of everyday ones. Of course, on our ship, it wasn't Wedgwood or Royal Worcestershire, but it was still very high quality. I'd really like to see it, especially since porcelain is my weakness, but what's not there, is not there. Incidentally, food was served from a special buffet, which today serves as a souvenir stand. Another interesting fact: the flagship's wardroom and bedroom (he had the privilege of dining separately from everyone else in his cabin) were lined with ordinary 10mm-thick steel. But the buffet was protected by armor… 130mm thick!


We go down... And there are corridors like these


And such... And there are pipes and cables running everywhere


Cabin company


In addition to the wardroom, the officers also had their own lounge for cultural recreation. It contained a chess table, a piano, leather sofas, large tables, and shelves filled with books.


The ashtray still remains “from those times”…

A popular Soviet song goes, "My sailor's quarters are dear to me..." However, when I peered into the open quarters, it didn't seem "dear" at all. The crew quarters were located on the first and second continuous decks, and there were only 38 of them, accommodating between 20 and 80 people. They had bunks in three tiers. Even a storage locker, lined with a mattress, was used as a bunk. It was the least prestigious place in the navy, usually reserved for new recruits. It immediately reminded me of prison, where everyone lies differently in their cells. I imagined this quarters filled with people rubbing their asses against each other, and I thought it would be very difficult for a sociopath like me.


The cabin in the photograph could still be called elite: it housed only 27 sailors and had portholes, something similar cabins one or two decks below could not boast.


It's a bit cramped, needless to say...


Cabinets with compartments for sailors' personal belongings

Once a day, between 7:30 and 8:00, the ship was ordered to fill with fresh water. Those who failed to do so were left without tea for the entire day. Only officers and warrant officers were entitled to leave. Enlisted sailors could only receive it for specific merits, and it often happened that during their three years of service, many were unable to take a single vacation; their only real assignment was service.


Entrance to the operating room


Some kind of medical facility


Laboratory for conducting tests


Therapist's office

The ship had a well-equipped medical unit. It had its own operating room, a post-operative room, a 24-person infirmary, a pharmacy, an X-ray room, an isolation room for six patients, and separate offices for the ship's three specialist doctors: a general practitioner, a surgeon, and a dentist. Surgeries such as appendectomy were performed right on board. Fortunately, the need for more complex surgeries never arose on board—the cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov was also famous for the fact that throughout its entire career, it never suffered a single fatal medical incident.


The galley. It's just huge... And very functional, if you look at it.

The ship had two galleys. Food had to be prepared four times a day: for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and evening tea. The menu for the crew was fairly traditional: soup, borscht, mashed potatoes, cutlets, and compote. Officers were entitled to extra rations with each meal: sausage, cheese, biscuits, and jam. Orderlies might have snuck a few slices of sausage or biscuits for tea, but that's just my best guess based on my experience.


Galley. Continuing the inspection. One can imagine how many sailors were assigned to duty daily just to peel potatoes!


The door to the bakery. Again, how much bread she baked every day—it was enough to kill you…

Interestingly, post-war Soviet ships, until the 60s, had no mess halls—sailors ate directly in their quarters using a "tank" system. A "tank man" was assigned to a crew of 6-8 men. Upon command, he would go to the galley deck and receive a tank containing the first and second courses, as well as a kettle. He would carry this to the quarters, where folding tables ("tanks") were already set up in the passageways. It was at these tables that the sailors, sitting on the lockers, would eat.


Photographs of the library. This is what it looked like in those distant times.

In addition to the library, the cruiser also had its own printing press, reading room, bath and laundry facilities, club, and even... a shoe repair shop. Overall, the onboard equipment allowed for all types of repair work to be carried out right at sea, without entering port: electric welding, machining, electrical installation, gas cutting, and more.


And this is the shed where you could tidy yourself up.


Well, these are the electronic devices of that time. Today, one such "box" could easily replace a tablet as thick as a matchbox!


Ship's telephone

I really wanted to visit the engine room of this ship. And I finally got to do it. The experience was… stunning, there's no other way to put it…


Inside the engine room. Why was such a curved pipe needed?

Well, the information about the main propulsion plant of the Project 68-bis cruisers is as follows: in general, it is similar to the same plant of the Chapayev-class cruisers (Project 68-K). It has two autonomous echelons, located in eight compartments. The design weight is 1911 tons. The steam boilers were six vertical water-tube boilers of the triangular type KV-68 with natural circulation (one in each boiler room). There was a forced air supply system to the boiler rooms. The steam capacity of each boiler at full speed was 115,000 kg/h, the working steam pressure was 25 kgf/cm², the superheated steam temperature was 370°±20°C, the evaporating heating surface was 1107 m², the specific gravity was 17,4 kg/hp.

The two main turbo-gear units (TZA) were of the TV-7 type, with a rated power of 55,000 hp each, and a combined maximum design power of 118,100–128,000 hp (118,100–128,000 hp) at full forward speed and 25,270 hp (25,200–27,000 hp) at full astern. Each turbo-gear unit drove one shaft line, with the shaft line length on the starboard side being 84,9 meters, and on the port side from the aft engine room — 43,7 meters. The shafts, with a diameter of 0,5 m, in turn, drove two brass propellers, with a diameter of 4,58 meters and a mass of 16,4 tons each, with a rotation speed of 315 rpm.


Control and management devices


Tachometers of the main engines, left and right


Turbine casing


The mechanisms are simply monstrously powerful!

It's worth noting that the KV-68 boilers were already outdated at the time the cruiser was built, primarily due to their heavy weight and poor steam performance. Therefore, after the Project 68-bis cruisers, they were no longer installed on our ships.


The steam pipes were coated with asbestos, and yet the heat in the engine room sometimes rose to 70 degrees…

At that time, TV-7 turbine generators were manufactured by the Kharkiv Turbogenerator Plant (KhTGZ). These were fairly advanced devices for the time, featuring adjustable inlet guide vanes, which reduced fatigue stress in the turbine blades.


A hatch leading somewhere really deep down. But I didn't go there, and besides, it was downright cold.

There were also two auxiliary steam boilers of the KVS-68-bis type, with a steam capacity of 10,5 tons per hour, for heating and the crew's domestic needs while moored. Electricity was generated by five TD-6 turbogenerators and four DG-300 diesel generators, each with a capacity of 300 kW.


And this is the well-known ship's bell - the rynda...

The cruiser's fuel reserves totaled 3800 tons (fuel oil), 95 tons (drinking water), and 420 tons (boiler water). The cruiser's water and food reserves allowed it to endure for up to 30 days. There were no limitations on its seaworthiness.

To be continued ...
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    27 September 2026 05: 02
    It's just unclear what missions, in an era of rapid development in aviation and missile weapons, an artillery ship should perform in such a confined area as the Black Sea? Even with the prospect of entering the Mediterranean Sea? I read the article with interest, and thank you to the author!
    1. +8
      27 September 2026 06: 28
      Quote: Schneeberg
      It's just unclear what tasks, in an era of rapid development of aviation and missile weapons, an artillery ship should perform in such a closed water area as the Black Sea?

      So this is a museum... well, it looks like the entire Black Sea Fleet will soon be a museum, and the fleet commander will be the main tour guide...
      Although maybe they will still figure out how to become useful
      1. +8
        27 September 2026 10: 15
        Quote: Konnick
        and the fleet commander will be the main tour guide...
        In that case, this will be the highest paid tour guide in the history of museums. wink
        1. +4
          27 September 2026 10: 38
          The only question is the potential responsibility for such a decent payment.
        2. 0
          30 September 2026 18: 40
          I don't think so. Nicholas I, Britain's Elizabeth II, and today's Charles III all worked as tour guides.
      2. 0
        6 October 2026 14: 47
        In 1972, after our first year, the Borodino training ship brought us to the 5th point (off Crete). The Oktyabrina was moored there. It was summer, the Mediterranean, a wooden deck, a ship on active duty, extra rations, a three-hour lunch break, and movies every day. We were supposed to have a month of practical training, but we never had the chance, so we spent two months basking in these conditions. At night, we peeled potatoes; each cadet got one bag and a table knife—peel as much as you wanted. But they weighed the peeled potatoes, and if we didn't have enough, the next night was ours, so we did our best. Once, we were loading flour (at night, of course), and everything was covered in flour, and the showers were seawater, so you couldn't wash off. The cadets were scattered throughout the combat units and services. I was in the X-wing, sleeping in the 30th quarters, between the aft main battery turrets, with the cellar below us. We did minor cleaning four times a day. The cruiser periodically provided line-of-sight escort for the Roosevelt, like, "We'll fire first," and that's it... We were heading to Cyprus, Latakia. Point near Crete #5 ("Our Home"), Point near Cyprus #55 ("Dacha"). Excellent practice.
    2. + 11
      27 September 2026 06: 51
      Quote: Schneeberg
      It's just unclear what missions, in an era of rapid development in aviation and missile weapons, an artillery ship should perform in such a confined waterway as the Black Sea? Even with the prospect of entering the Mediterranean?

      It is always like this: generals and admirals prepared for the past war, not the raging one.
      However, cruisers and destroyers with artillery weapons finally disappeared from the seas only in the 80s.
      The same advanced Americans used artillery cruisers and battleships to bombard coastal positions right up until Operation Desert Storm...
      1. +4
        27 September 2026 12: 43
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        It is always like this: generals and admirals prepared for the past war, not the raging one.
        They built what they could. There wasn't a choice between a missile cruiser (aircraft carrier) or the Mikhail Kutuzov. It was either the Mikhail Kutuzov or nothing (or, well, a couple of destroyers, the old ones, not the Arleigh Berks).
        1. +1
          28 September 2026 11: 21
          Quote: bk0010
          They built what they could. There was no choice between a missile cruiser (aircraft carrier) or the Mikhail Kutuzov.

          Perhaps there weren't any in the 40s. But Project 68-bis was built until the second half of the 50s! Even the Ministry of Shipbuilding, which had a very negative attitude toward any modernization of projects already under construction, asked the navy to convert the cruise missiles under construction into air defense cruise missiles—apparently sensing that otherwise the orders would be cancelled. And it was a sure thing...
          The Navy, however, drowned both Project 68-bis SAM rearmament projects in a swamp of approvals. And then, in their memoirs, admirals lamented how the evil corncob had slaughtered the pride and joy of the navy—the artillery cruisers from the late 30s—right on the slipway. Those same cruisers the navy hadn't even dared send to escort our TRs in Anadyr.
          And in the same memoirs, the admirals were proud of the first missile cruisers and large anti-submarine ships built during the time of the corn-grower they hated. smile
          1. 0
            28 September 2026 23: 52
            Quote: Alexey RA
            But Project 68-bis was built until the second half of the 50s!

            Quote: Alexey RA
            KR-100 air defense – apparently sensing that otherwise the orders would be cancelled. And he was right on target.
            The C-75 was completed in early 1958. The C-25 had appeared earlier, but they were purely stationary. An air defense artillery cruiser wasn't up to the task of countering jet aircraft. What was to be done?
            1. +1
              29 September 2026 15: 39
              Quote: bk0010
              An air defense artillery cruiser wasn't up to the task of attacking jet aircraft. What was to be done?

              Design Project 70 or 71 for the M-2, which did not go into production, and install the M-1 in its place, then replacing them with the M-11.
              In any case, the modernization of the Project 68-bis for the SAM system would have been completed just by the beginning of the 60s - when the Project 61 was already being built and the first Project 56-K with M-1 was being modernized.
              And our shipbuilders have a long-standing tradition of delivering ships to the navy without weapons systems and repeatedly upgrading already built ships... smile
          2. +1
            30 September 2026 19: 16
            The Navy drowned both projects to re-equip the Project 68-bis with air defense missile systems in a swamp of approvals.


            Two factors played a role. First, the S-75 Volkhov was extremely inconvenient for naval deployment. Its bulky missiles used toxic and corrosive fuel, were non-ampouled (meaning the tanks were filled before launch), and had non-folding fins. The Navy was particularly wary of this idea.

            There were plans to use a version of the Volkhov with ramjet solid-fuel missiles; these were developed and tested in the late 1950s in an attempt to increase the S-75's firing range. The Navy was quite fond of this idea. But a second factor came into play: while work was underway on new missiles for the S-75, the Navy had already adopted the M-1 Volna, a much more convenient and compact missile. Then came the idea of ​​completely modernizing the Volna, which in turn led to the development of the M-11 Shtorm.

            IMHO, the optimal idea for the Navy in the late 1950s would have been to order a kerosene-fueled ramjet missile compatible with the S-75 Volkhov from Soviet design bureaus. Such a missile would have been much more user-friendly than the originals, and could have been developed in a very short timeframe (Soviet design bureaus had extensive experience with kerosene-fueled ramjet missiles).
            1. 0
              1 October 2026 12: 20
              Quote: Destroyermen
              Two factors played a role. First, the S-75 Volkhov was extremely inconvenient for naval deployment. Its bulky missiles used toxic and corrosive fuel, were non-ampouled (meaning the tanks were filled before launch), and had non-folding fins. The Navy was particularly wary of this idea.

              Nevertheless, the Dzerzhinsky was given over to the Navy for the installation of the M-2.
              Quote: Destroyermen
              The fleet really didn't like this idea.

              The Navy didn't like the Shchuka missile system either. However, they ordered ships with the Shchuka missile system, and then re-equipped them with a normal guided missile system.
              Quote: Destroyermen
              IMHO, the optimal idea for the navy in the late 1950s would have been to order a ramjet kerosene missile compatible with the S-75 Volkhov from Soviet design bureaus.

              It's too late. By the time they develop and test them, the cruise missiles will already be cut up. If the Navy had been interested in completing the Project 68-bis cruise missiles as air defense cruise missiles, they should have approved the project to re-equip them with the M-2, thereby "armoring" the unfinished hulls. And then throw up their hands, cursing the failed designers, and install the M-1. smile
              1. 0
                1 October 2026 17: 55
                Nevertheless, the Dzerzhinsky was given over to the Navy for the installation of the M-2.


                Precisely because I wanted to see what would come of it. No one liked the results.
                The Navy didn't like the Shchuka missile system either. However, they ordered ships with the Shchuka missile system, and then re-equipped them with a normal guided missile system.

                Actually, I liked it. The problem is, it quickly became outdated. But the "Pike" ran on regular kerosene and was much more pleasant to talk to.

                It's too late. By the time they develop it and test it, the KRL will already be cut up. 


                The buildings were kept until the early 1960s.

                , then it was necessary to approve the project for their rearmament under the M-2 - thereby “armoring” the unfinished hulls.


                That's how it started with the Nakhimov. But the results of the trials at the Dzerzhinsky led to the navy's sudden coolness toward the idea.

                P.S. I recently made an alternative project about completing the 68-ZIF cruisers to the kerosene-ramjet version of the Volkhov.

                https://fonzeppelin.livejournal.com/432229.html
      2. +2
        27 September 2026 12: 57
        artillery cruisers and battleships to bombard coastal positions until Operation Desert Storm

        "When repelling a landing from space in 2012. wink
    3. +3
      27 September 2026 07: 00
      Quote: Schneeberg
      It's just unclear what tasks, in an era of rapid development of aviation and missile weapons, an artillery ship should perform in such a closed water area as the Black Sea?
      It seems that they followed the US ships at a minimum distance.
      1. 0
        28 September 2026 17: 11
        Yes, absolutely! Naval formations in the Mediterranean used the tactic of pursuing US carrier groups. Artillery cruisers took up positions in close proximity to the carriers. During periods of threat, the objective was to close to minimum range and, at the onset of combat, engage the enemy carrier with artillery fire. It was assumed that this tactic allowed for a close-range artillery salvo to be launched before the carrier could launch its main forces. Destroying and sinking the carrier was, of course, unrealistic, but disrupting the deployment of air wings by damaging the flight deck, elevators, superstructures, and aircraft was possible. There's no point in discussing one-way tickets and the like, since this scenario would then have launched approximately 76 "special warheads," the USSR and NATO, who would have issued one-way tickets to everyone, willing and unwilling, wholesale and retail.
      2. 0
        30 September 2026 19: 11
        Let's say that when it worked. It didn't always work.
    4. 0
      30 September 2026 19: 08
      Initially, Project 68-bis was designed specifically for coastal water control; formations of cruisers and destroyers were intended to ensure Soviet control over the Black and Baltic Seas (as well as the Sea of ​​Okhotsk and the Barents Sea), preventing NATO naval forces from reaching the Soviet coast.
  2. +5
    27 September 2026 06: 03
    Thanks a lot to the author for the article and photos. It feels like I've been on the tour myself. Interesting.
  3. +4
    27 September 2026 06: 28
    Portholes in the MO? Were they always there, or were they added later?
    1. +3
      27 September 2026 06: 49
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Portholes in the MO? Were they always there, or were they added later?

      Ah, it's probably the lamps that were photographed like that.
    2. +5
      27 September 2026 06: 54
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Portholes in the MO? Were they always there, or were they added later?

      On submarines and torpedo boats of that time, no, they didn't. On cruisers, above the armor belt, they always did.
      1. +5
        27 September 2026 07: 07
        Is my belt above my armor? Of course not.
        And not always - the Americans removed the portholes.
        These are lamps, I've already spotted them.
    3. + 10
      27 September 2026 06: 57
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Portholes in the MO?

      There were no portholes there. They were just lamps. Otherwise, it was dark as a grave and cold!
      1. man
        +4
        27 September 2026 11: 10
        I remembered my father... after the war he served on the Kutuzov as a survivability division commander...
        Thank you, Vyacheslav hi
  4. +1
    27 September 2026 07: 38
    I'm really curious to see what kind of machinery they have there. With such a scale, it's possible (needed?) to have a decent, well, not a workshop, but a real one.
  5. + 10
    27 September 2026 07: 48
    The boatswain's crew on Project 68 bis cruisers reported to the ship's assistant, not the chief mate, but the assistant, and the cleanliness of the anchor chains was clearly visible to those who went to the stern capstans every morning before reveille to peel potatoes. On these cruisers, in addition to the bow anchors, there was also a stern anchor, and the potatoes for the entire crew were peeled by those assigned to duty in the stern capstans. The potatoes needed to be peeled, depending on the day's menu, amounted to anywhere from 100 to 200 kilograms (I can't remember exactly how many), so no cook could have handled it alone. Peeling potatoes was assigned from all combat units, and anyone sent to peel potatoes at 3 a.m. was tantamount to punishment... So "outsiders" didn't even set foot in the galley. Incidentally, the galley wasn't located on the galley deck, as the article claims, but on the galley platform of the lower deck. The lower deck was the duty station for the officer on duty below; there was a 24-hour watch for officers, in addition to the ship's duty officer.
    Another thing about the galley: no one who was late getting drinking water was left without tea. Tea was only drunk during meals, and teapots with pre-brewed tea from a canister were handed out in the galley. On a warship, you can't just drink tea whenever you want. Drinking water was only collected in drinking tanks, which were in each cabin. There was plenty of space in the cabins, and the lockers were supposed to contain, in addition to everything else, a set of clean work clothes, which sometimes had to be presented clean and folded during morning inspection. The work clothes on these first-rank ships were white, and they were mainly checked for cleanliness on the inside. All the seams were laundered. And that's except for the work clothes you were wearing. They also had to be clean. And after washing, there was nowhere to dry the work clothes made of material like canvas, especially in winter. But it could be dried in literally twenty minutes by tying it with cords to the ventilation shaft grates on the upper deck. But that could get you assigned out-of-turn duty. That's where, every morning, before everyone else got up, those peeling potatoes would appear in the aft spires. Every evening, there would be about ten people (out of about a thousand conscripts) who had somehow broken some rules all over the ship. No, there were more; others would go out at night to help BC-5 clean under-decks. So peeling potatoes wasn't even a bad punishment...
    1. +1
      27 September 2026 17: 13
      A potato peeler is visible in the photo of the galley. Therefore, peeling potatoes at night is only a disciplinary measure. What was missing was a laundry steam chamber and steam mops for cleaning the rooms, connected to the heating steam line. Steam removes any dirt and dries work clothes in minutes. No pathogens or parasites survive washing and steam cleaning. Perhaps a pipe should have been installed throughout the interior to supply a hot, ready-to-use cleaning solution.
  6. +5
    27 September 2026 08: 00
    Regarding the crew's living space on the cruiser, I can say that on the Project 30 and 56 destroyers, it was worse in this regard. It was more cramped, with less space per person. I had the chance to live for three days on the Project 68-K cruiser Komsomolets, formerly the Chkalov, in the aft forecastle. There were a lot of people, but I wouldn't say it was cramped. Especially since I had something to compare it to afterwards. We ate with a tank system, with 10 people per forecastle, not 6-8. We sat not only on the lockers but also on the cans, which are folding benches. The menu included more than just a starter, a main course, tea, and compote. There was always some kind of salad, like cabbage or vinaigrette, and herring was often served too. On holidays, there were chocolates and cookies and other such things. The food on the BS was a real treat! I don't understand—the cruiser had its own bakery, did they bake bread at the base too? Usually, bread was delivered to the ships by bread trucks at the base, and that's how it was with us. I also don't understand the water for tea—if you don't get any, you'll be left without tea. What nonsense! We had tea in the galley morning and evening, compote for lunch and dinner, and meals were served four times a day. Thanks to the author for the article.
    1. +7
      27 September 2026 08: 30
      Yuri, for example, the cruiser Sverdlov had its own bakery. I've never eaten such delicious bread, especially when it was hot, anywhere since then. When we were moored at the berth, we baked our own bread on board. But not always. Bread trucks brought it from the bakery depot. And we could immediately tell the difference by taste. The bread from the ship's bakery was delicious. And you're right about the salads. There were cabbage salads and vinaigrettes, and at the berth in Baltiysk in the summer they even served fresh cucumbers thinly sliced ​​in sunflower oil, but not often.
      Regarding the order on the cruiser Pryu 68 bis. Under Gorbachev's rule, I was sent to retrain at the same Baltiysk on a minesweeper, even though it didn't have my S-M-5-1S artillery mount. Why did they draft me there if the only artillery mount they had was an AK-230, and I couldn't handle it! And the sailors' work clothes were blue and completely greasy and dirty. I can just imagine what they would have been like if they had been white, like the ones we wore on the Sverdlov under Brezhnev and Gorshkov. When I asked the senior sailors on that minesweeper why they tolerated such chaos on the ship, they replied that the officers had said we would be sent to the disciplinary battalion for harassing the sailors, since the sailors could complain to the mothers' committee. Let the young sailors get dirty from laziness...
      So it was then that they started to dismantle the fleet.
      1. +4
        27 September 2026 09: 00
        My retraining experience was even more interesting. They found some kind of illness, sort of unfit for service on a ship, and I was sent to military training. I went twice: in Belarus, I studied the Grad, and in Strugi Krasnye, they gave me an AGS-17, and I even fired it. When I was wrapping my foot wraps for the first time, they asked me, "Didn't you serve in the army?" To which I honestly replied that I hadn't served in the army, but in the navy. That's the funny thing.
        Regarding bread. When we went out to sea, we ate bread at first, but when we ran out, we switched to biscuits and rusks. Well, that was for about a week. On the battleship, we baked our own bread. There was no special room; we baked in the galley at night after the cooks left. There were no full-time bakers; they were assigned from different battleship units, six people for a month: three baked white bread, three baked dark bread, every other night. I also had to bake dark bread. During the day, we prepared – we made the dough and kneaded it by hand in the lagoons. We baked at night and slept until lunch. Yes, you're right, the bread was very tasty, especially the white one.
    2. +3
      27 September 2026 08: 37
      Quote: Waterways 672
      then you'll be left without tea. What nonsense, tea in the galley was taken morning and evening, compote for lunch and dinner, meals were four times a day.

      I retold what they told me...
      1. +4
        27 September 2026 09: 06
        Yes, it's all clear, you have nothing to do with it. It's just that the person giving the tour didn't really understand the nuances of serving on naval ships at that time.
        1. +2
          27 September 2026 09: 29
          Quote: Waterways 672
          service on the Navy ships at that time

          That's when he served on it...
          1. +3
            27 September 2026 11: 12
            Drinking water in the forecastle is a must. Old ships had water tanks in the forecastle, as Not a Fighter wrote below. I also lived on the Grad small missile ship for a couple of days, not just on the Komsomolets. When we returned to the base from training, our destroyer was gone; it had left Liepaja for a parade in St. Petersburg, so we took turns living on different ships, waiting for ours to arrive. A Grad small missile ship was already a modern ship for its time; there was no tank, just a tap and a sink. Living conditions on a Grad small missile ship are no longer comparable to those on older ships. And regarding the fresh water supply, it varied from place to place. At our base in Liepaja, fresh water was available well; it came from shore lines, and there was always fresh water in the sinks. I know not all bases had a good water supply, but in the galley, where the tank crews got their teapots filled with brewed tea, water was always provided. At sea, it's a different story with drinking water. And as for the tanks, everywhere that had a tank system at that time, the tank was designed for 10 people.
            1. +2
              27 September 2026 11: 22
              The Shkval missile ship was there, I got it mixed up. There were three of them in Winter Harbor at the time.
              1. +2
                28 September 2026 06: 24
                There was also the "Zyb". My younger brother served on it. The most modern one at the time.
    3. +1
      4 October 2026 07: 27
      You just haven't seen a naval bakery. It's just a 2m x 1.5m x 1.5m crate, producing 400 loaves a day. It's quiet and small for a ship.
  7. +3
    27 September 2026 08: 33
    Tachometers of the main engines, left and right
    “I’m not a nautical person at all, but I don’t think these are tachometers.
    1. +1
      27 September 2026 16: 26
      It looks like a reversible marine tachometer.
      https://violity.com/ru/114486634-sudovoj-strelochnyj-tahometr-vpered-nazad-1
      1. 0
        1 October 2026 06: 44
        That's right. These are still used on Soviet-built ships. They have a type SM (aircraft) light bulb in the middle.
        1. 0
          1 October 2026 08: 19
          In the middle they have a backlight bulb of the CM type (aircraft type).

          I grabbed a whole box when I went to demobilize. :))
          1. 0
            1 October 2026 13: 54
            Battery-less emergency telephones are still in use today, on older ships. The only problem with these phones is the microphones failing. But they're easy to replace. All inspectors always use these phones.

            *I grabbed a whole box when I went to demobilize. :))*

            I removed the sockets of such lamps and installed LED indicators instead.
            And at one time, even respected manufacturers, for example ABB, used such lamps at 12, 24, 136, 220 V, moreover, with built-in transformers to the socket.
            1. +1
              4 October 2026 07: 29
              I was talking on a phone like this at a factory last winter. Explosion-proof design. 60s-70s, works great.
  8. +4
    27 September 2026 08: 57
    Some of the cruiser's equipment is still used for its intended purpose today, on Soviet-built merchant ships.
    Omsk, Volzhsky, Sormovsky, OTA pushers.

    Electric galley stove, also known as PKE - we see them in the photo of the cruiser's galley.
    They should also have control panels for the burners and oven. Incidentally, it's designed for baking bread and has loaf pans.
    The lamps in Moscow are large - they are also called *watermelons* in common parlance.
    The packet switches in the photo in the utility room were installed on ships we built even in the 2000s.
    The interior lighting fixtures in the photo are type CC328. They were installed on ships built by us even in the 2000s.

    But the hatch that the author did not want to go down into should be battened down.
    1. +2
      27 September 2026 16: 32
      Quote from seamen2
      must be battened down.

      It was sealed shut - they opened it for me to show me the lower floor... And they probably wouldn't have objected if I had climbed up there. But I didn't want to...
  9. +3
    27 September 2026 09: 11
    I will continue with my sailor's life.
    The food system: a tank (table), 10 men sit at a time, and the tanker (coverer) gets one "set" per tank. In larger units, there were several covers; we had one for two tanks, and we swapped. We ate in the mess hall; yes, on the Kirov, even the personnel ate in the mess hall. For organizational reasons (this was when we were sent an infantry fighting vehicle, a battalion of young recruits), we ate in the crew quarters for a while, and I'll say that with the tank system, it's more convenient to eat in the crew quarters. If only because the orderly will keep an eye on the dishes, and most importantly, he'll immediately sit down at the tank and we eat in one shift (with meals in the mess hall, we eat in two shifts, meaning the men go to eat, and the orderly is then relieved). It's both faster and easier, in the sense that the orderly has to leave a portion, and you try to protect anything from those gluttons. Yes, the orderly is not allowed to eat during the watch, but the master officers/warrant officers from the supply department turn a blind eye to this, it’s easier for them, the personnel quickly eat and can leave.
    Regarding water supply rationing, there MUST be a tank of drinking water in the quarters, and one of the duty officers was to change the water when it was supplied. Water was supplied on a schedule: in the morning for washing, before meals for washing hands, for cleaning, and before lights out for washing again. Water for washing dishes was supplied separately. The command "Water is supplied to the personnel dishwashers" was given, and they would set the table and wash the dishes. In the officers' quarters, there was a tank above the sink with a valve; when the water was supplied, you pressed the valve and filled the tank.
    Nothing was said about the instruments, but they WERE THERE!!
    And about the upper/lower berths in the crew quarters. Excuse me, but have you ever traveled by train? Where's the best place to travel while you're young and healthy? I'd go for the top berth; at least they're less bothersome there. And it's easier to make the bunk on the top berth. Because the "lower" berth puts his bedding on top of it, and you have to make it yourself; you just tuck it in and that's it, and he has to smooth out the wrinkles, and not in the most comfortable position, since you have to reach. I remember after the BMPs were finally assigned to the crew quarters (and this was in the summer and fall of 1992, the height of the fight against "godkovshchina"), the "big deputy" (formerly the deputy political officer, now the "ship's deputy commander for personnel affairs") personally walked through the crew quarters and checked where the young men were put to sleep.
  10. ANB
    +4
    27 September 2026 10: 45
    And where did they put the billiard table from the salon?
    Was on Alexander Nevsky. Ivory balls.
  11. +5
    27 September 2026 12: 49
    Due to some peculiarities of my brain's convolutions, I don't remember my first and middle names.

    and I thought that a sociopath like me would have a really hard time here

    Same thing. Very inconvenient.
    And such... And there are pipes and cables running everywhere
    I was sure that on warships, the corridors should allow the crew to run in both directions simultaneously and without interference. But here, only one can move.
    Photographs of the library. This is what it looked like in those distant times.
    I didn't see any safety equipment for pitching. Why didn't the books spill out?
    1. +2
      4 October 2026 07: 32
      Previously, the left corridor runs to the stern, the right to the forecastle (bow)
      1. +1
        4 October 2026 11: 53
        Quote: Uncle Vlad
        Previously, the left corridor runs to the stern, the right to the forecastle (bow)
        Option!
  12. ANB
    +3
    27 September 2026 15: 34
    Will there be a third part?
    The most interesting:
    Look through the rangefinder. What optics!
    "Computer" control system.
    The commander's cabin and the admiral's salon.
    1. +4
      27 September 2026 16: 37
      Quote: ANB
      Will there be a third part?
      The most interesting:
      Look through the rangefinder. What optics!
      "Computer" control system.
      The commander's cabin and the admiral's salon.

      There will be a third. But I didn't get to the admiral's lounge, the commander's cabin, or even the main control room. Well... as for me, I was given a great welcome and shown a lot. And the story was very interesting.
      1. ANB
        +1
        27 September 2026 18: 46
        Well, what is there?
        To explore the entire cruiser and see all the interesting things, you'd have to live there for a month. And the cruiser has to be operational, not a museum. This is precisely what cruising practice is for cadets.
        But this is the last 68 bis, so there are no other options now.
        1. +3
          27 September 2026 19: 00
          Quote: ANB
          You have to live there for a month.

          Well, a month or not... But I only had two hours, and I arrived at the station just before boarding the train.
          1. ANB
            +2
            27 September 2026 23: 36
            But I only had two hours.

            + + +
            It's impossible to live in a museum for a month.
            This is still a decommissioned ship, not the original.
            There's nothing else like it now, so a huge thank you to the author for this description and photo. Many people reminisced about their youth. My cruising experience left a lasting impression on me. I've never seen anything like it anywhere else.
  13. +1
    27 September 2026 19: 17
    In addition to the wardroom, the officers also had their own lounge for cultural recreation. It contained a chess table, a piano, leather sofas, large tables, and shelves filled with books.

    It's not a ship, but a floating brothel! laughing
    1. +6
      27 September 2026 21: 48
      Quote: Melior
      In addition to the wardroom, the officers also had their own lounge for cultural recreation. It contained a chess table, a piano, leather sofas, large tables, and shelves filled with books.

      It's not a ship, but a floating brothel! laughing

      The wardrooms on cruisers were the envy of everyone from destroyers to submarines. Even nuclear-powered submarines like the Akula couldn't match their comfort.
  14. +3
    28 September 2026 01: 58
    ".. and it often happened that during the entire three years of service, many were not able to go on vacation even once; their lot was only service..."
    /////////////////////////////////
    In the 1950s and early 1960s, the length of compulsory naval service was four years. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, some conscripts had to serve five (!) years. Demobilization was delayed.
  15. +1
    28 September 2026 07: 57
    Quote: bk0010
    Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
    It is always like this: generals and admirals prepared for the past war, not the raging one.
    They built what they could. There wasn't a choice between a missile cruiser (aircraft carrier) or the Mikhail Kutuzov. It was either the Mikhail Kutuzov or nothing (or, well, a couple of destroyers, the old ones, not the Arleigh Berks).

    Yes!
  16. +1
    28 September 2026 10: 25
    Thanks for the article and photos. I'm a landlubber. I've only been on a warship once. It was the large landing craft "Admiral Nevelskiy." We loaded up at lunchtime and spent the night in a similar three-tiered cabin. The next day, we "landed" on Sakhalin.
    I don't remember the year, around 2016. The local ferries broke down or something like that. The landing ship was transporting civilians.
    I look at all this and understand. It would be torture for me to serve my mandatory military service on a ship. It's full of confined spaces and no vacation.
  17. +1
    29 September 2026 15: 14
    Excellent reviews of the ship... My wife and daughter were there in May... Tons of photos, and I got an anchor keychain... I told her how to strike the ship's bells with a ship's bell, and the guide let her do it! I served in Kamchatka, TOGE...
  18. 0
    5 October 2026 09: 27
    And why couldn't the entire crew be fed equally?