The Condor Legion and the Struggle for Air Superiority in the Skies of Spain

5 117 40
The Condor Legion and the Struggle for Air Superiority in the Skies of Spain

The Condor Legion played a significant, though not decisive, role in Francisco Franco's victory in the Spanish Civil War—it significantly increased Franco's military capabilities and contributed to their air superiority. However, the popular metaphor that the Germans "practiced the Blitzkrieg" in Spain isn't entirely accurate—in 1936, the Wehrmacht didn't yet have a unified doctrine that could simply be "tested in Spain."

When speaking about the Condor Legion, historians often view it simultaneously as a military force, as a means of German intervention, and as a testing ground for the development of German military aviationIt's hard to deny that Spain became a kind of combat laboratory for the Luftwaffe: German crews gained experience in real warfare, tested new aircraft, and perfected their air force techniques. However, for the Luftwaffe, Spain was not so much a "testing ground" for the established blitzkrieg doctrine and dive-bombing tactics of the Junkers Ju 87 Stuka, but rather a school for the combat use of aviation in general.



As historian Christopher Locksley rightly notes, the Spanish experience significantly changed German air doctrine, particularly fighter tactics and air superiority [2]. The Germans were given the opportunity not only to test aircraft but also to explore tactical concepts in real conflict. However, the experience was mixed: different types of operations yielded different results. Locksley believes that the most significant "revolution" occurred in the area of ​​air superiority tactics—fighter tactics.

The Spanish skies gave the Germans the opportunity to encounter modern enemy fighters, primarily the Soviet I-15 and I-16, and to practically revise pre-war notions of how fighters should operate. This led to a shift away from older, dense formations toward more flexible formations such as the Rotte (a pair of two aircraft) and Schwarm (a flight of two pairs)—the later famous German "quadron" system. In other words, Spain gave the Luftwaffe not just "air combat experience" but contributed to a change in the very tactics of air combat.

Locksley concludes that the Spanish experience had a profound influence on the combat doctrine with which Germany entered World War II in 1939. The most significant change, however, was in fighter tactics and air superiority.

American historian James Corum, for his part, characterizes Spain as a crucial school for the development of German close air support. In his book, "The Condor Legion, 1936–1939: The Luftwaffe's Use of Blitzkrieg in the Spanish Civil War," he notes that the Condor significantly increased the Nationalists' military capabilities and played a key role in a number of operations [1]. Despite the book's pretentious title, Corum does not claim that the Germans invented blitzkrieg in Spain; his thesis is that the war in Spain was a crucial stage in the Luftwaffe's development.

The author of these lines will examine the above-mentioned work by Corum, which is more of a compact operational-military analysis than a fundamental monograph, in this material.

The emergence of the Condor Legion



Corum begins with the political and social polarization of Spain. By 1936, the country was effectively split into two opposing camps: on one side were conservatives, monarchists, Catholics, landowners, the petty bourgeoisie, and the rapidly growing Falange; on the other, a broad coalition of socialists, radical socialists, anarchists, communists, and other leftist forces, supported by trade unions and the poor peasantry.

Following the suppression of the attempted right-wing coup of 1932, political polarization continued to deepen. In the summer of 1936, a group of rebel generals led by Emilio Mola, José Sanjurjo, and Francisco Franco began plotting an uprising. The assassination of monarchist opposition leader José Calvo Sotelo on July 13 accelerated the plot against the Second Republic. A military mutiny began on July 16–17.

The Nationalist uprising was led by a small group of generals. General José Sanjurjo, who had led an attempted right-wing coup in 1932, was imprisoned and later amnestied by the government. He lived in exile in Portugal and was the highest-ranking conspirator. Another high-ranking officer was General Emilio Mola, a veteran of the North African wars who served as governor-general and commandant of Pamplona in Navarre. Mola had developed close ties with the major monarchist movement in northern Spain. The third most senior leader of the Nationalist junta was General Francisco Franco.

Initially, the rebels planned to carry out a quick coup d'état by seizing Spain's two most populous cities, Madrid and Barcelona, ​​relying primarily on the army. However, this plan failed. A significant portion of the country, including Madrid, Barcelona, ​​and the main industrial areas, remained under the control of the Republic. Meanwhile, the rebels captured significant territories in the north, Seville and Cádiz in the south, and, most importantly, Spanish Morocco. Here, the Army of Africa, a roughly 35-strong force composed of Moroccan volunteers, units of the Spanish Legion, and seasoned veterans of the colonial wars, was stationed. Corum rightly considered this force to be Spain's most capable military force.

The problem was that the Army of Africa was in Morocco, while the Republic controlled the sea and blockaded the Strait of Gibraltar. For this reason, Franco decided to airlift troops. To achieve these goals, he turned to Germany and Italy for assistance. German businessmen Adolf Langenheim and Johannes Bernhardt played a key role in the contacts between Franco and Hitler. They met with Hitler on July 25–26, 1936, convincing him to support Franco's forces. Shortly after the meeting, Hitler instructed Göring to organize the aid, and General Helmut Wilberg created a special staff—Special Staff W—to lead the operation.

Initially, the Germans had no plans to participate in combat operations—in the first days of the German intervention in Spain, they had no more than 20 Ju 52 aircraft and six Heinkel He 51 fighters at their disposal, which landed in Cadiz on August 6. But the mission quickly changed. By the end of July, German Ju 52s began transporting troops from Tetouan to Seville. An aircraft designed for approximately 17 passengers could carry up to 40 Moroccan soldiers. From July 27 to October, German aircraft transported more than 13,000 troops and approximately 270 tons of weapons and equipment. Corum considers this operation the first major airborne transport operation of its kind in stories.

Gradually, the Germans transitioned from military transport operations to direct combat. A major turning point in the conflict occurred in August 1936, when Major von Scheele authorized a German bomber strike on the battleship Jaime I. The Republican superiority fleet In the straits between Africa and mainland Spain, the Nationalists faced serious difficulties: the anti-aircraft batteries of the Jaime I fired at German transport planes flying over the ship, forcing them to gain higher altitude, and also bombed and blockaded Cadiz, the only major port in southern Spain under Nationalist control.

Disabling the Jaime I was intended to be the first step toward the Nationalists' control of the sea lanes. Von Scheele ordered the conversion of two Ju 52s into bombers, using equipment delivered with the first shipment. Receiving intelligence on August 12 that the Jaime I was in Málaga Bay, von Scheele ordered a strike against the ship the following day using two converted Ju 52s. The aircraft were to be flown by Captains von Moro and Henke. Von Moro's aircraft failed to spot the Jaime I due to low clouds, while Henke's Ju 52 hit the battleship, causing heavy damage and disabling it. This operation helped the Nationalists consolidate their position in southern Spain.

After this, the Germans began flying combat sorties in support of Nationalist columns advancing on Madrid. In August and September, they carried out small-scale attacks on airfields and ground targets, escorted bombers, and supported the advance of Yagüe's troops.

By October 1936, the German contingent in Spain had grown to approximately 600 men, as Spain was seen as an ideal testing ground for Luftwaffe aircraft. Twenty Heinkel He 46 reconnaissance and bombing aircraft appeared in Spain; two He 70s, intended for use as light bombers and reconnaissance aircraft; two He 60 naval floatplanes; one He 50 dive bomber; and two Henschel Hs 123 dive bombers. Four 88mm guns and 28 20mm anti-aircraft guns were also delivered to protect German airfields.

After the establishment of Franco's Nationalist government on October 1, Germany officially recognized it. German intervention largely played into Franco's hands, as Germany's initial support was not directed toward the Nationalist state—such a state did not yet exist at the time—but toward Franco personally. General Emilio Mola, who, unlike Franco, had failed to take the initiative and send representatives to Germany and Italy, was sidelined by political maneuvering from his role in the Nationalist uprising.

When the Germans received intelligence that the USSR had begun large-scale aid to the Republic, Berlin decided to increase the German presence but not to send large ground forces to Spain. Colonel Walter Warlimont, dispatched to Spain by the Wehrmacht headquarters in late August, opposed sending a large military contingent to Spain, as the deployment of significant ground forces would disrupt Germany's rearmament program and push Germany into open confrontation with other European powers—a confrontation that Hitler sought to avoid in 1936.

Instead, Warlimont proposed increasing the contingent already in Spain to an air task force of over 100 aircraft and 5000 troops. This is how the Condor Legion was born.

Corum emphasizes the dual purpose of the Condor: on the one hand, it was supposed to help Franco's forces, but at the same time, it was supposed to be a testing ground for aircraft, tanks, communications equipment, ammunition, and operational doctrine. General Hugo Sperrle assumed command of the legion in November 1936, and Wolfram von Richthofen became its chief of staff. The former was primarily responsible for strategic coordination with Franco, the latter for operational planning and the day-to-day conduct of the air war.

Why was German aviation so effective?



Corum makes a conclusion that is crucial for the entire book: the success of the Condor Legion in Spain cannot be explained solely by the technical superiority of individual aircraft. Its foundation lay in the Luftwaffe's pre-established organizational, personnel, and doctrinal base.

By the start of the Spanish Civil War, the Luftwaffe had officially existed for only 15 months: the German leadership announced the creation of a new branch of the armed forces to the world in May 1935. Under the conditions imposed on Germany after World War I, it was prohibited from having an air force, tanks, or modern weapons; its army was limited to 100,000 troops and 4000 officers.

At the same time, one of the most important lessons of World War I was the realization that modern warfare is impossible without a fully-fledged air force. By 1918, Germany, like all leading military powers, possessed a significant air force capable of performing a wide range of combat missions, including strategic bombing, air superiority, and close support of ground forces.

The restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles prompted the German military leadership to create a secret air force headquarters and a training system so that after the supposedly inevitable abandonment of the hated treaty and Germany's ability to resume rearmament, it would already have a solid basis for building an air force.

In 1935, the Luftwaffe published its aerial warfare doctrine, developed under the direction of General Walter Wever, who sought to instill a unified understanding among all Luftwaffe personnel regarding the nature and methods of air combat. German Luftwaffe Doctrine No. 16, "Luftkriegführung" ("Air Warfare"), was the result of the development of German military-theoretical views on the use of aviation, which had been developing since the 1920s.

According to this doctrine, aviation was to perform both strategic and operational missions. The sequence of actions envisioned: first, gaining air superiority by striking enemy airfields; then, attacks on communications, transport, and supply lines in the operational depths; and finally, direct support of ground forces. During an offensive, aviation was to concentrate at the decisive point and closely cooperate with the army. For this purpose, liaison officers, joint staffs, and regular army-air force exercises were created. Corum believes that in 1936, the Luftwaffe was ahead of most other air forces in this regard.

Under these circumstances, the Spanish Civil War was perceived by the Luftwaffe high command as an opportunity to test the fundamental tenets of military doctrine, organizational principles, and new aviation technology in real combat conditions. By 1936, the Luftwaffe's first-generation aircraft were rapidly being supplanted by second-generation aircraft, developed as part of the Air Force development and rearmament program adopted in 1934. It was this generation that included some of the most successful combat aircraft, which subsequently saw widespread use during World War II.

One of the most significant achievements of the new German aviation industry was the Messerschmitt Bf 109 fighter, which first took to the air in 1935. In terms of its technical characteristics and combat capabilities, this aircraft represented a quantum leap in the development of fighter aircraft. Its all-metal construction, retractable landing gear, powerful armament, and excellent flight characteristics gave the Bf 109 significant advantages over previous generations of fighters. The aircraft was highly maneuverable, possessed effective firepower, and maintained its high combat performance even at high altitudes.

The Luftwaffe's second-generation aircraft also included the Heinkel He 111 bomber, which had a cruising speed of over 250 mph (around 400 km/h), could carry over 1500 kg of bombs, and could operate at high altitudes. Its performance represented a quantum leap over the relatively primitive Ju 52 transport aircraft, which had been converted for bombing missions and formed the backbone of most Luftwaffe bomber squadrons in its early years.

Other combat aircraft also entered service, including the Ju 87 Stuka dive bomber, which would play a major role in World War II. The Dornier Do 17 could be used either as a long-range, high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft or as a high-speed light bomber. It proved highly successful in both roles.

Meanwhile, the Luftwaffe's technical development occurred during the war itself. Initially, the main fighter of the Condor Legion was the Heinkel He 51B. This fighter of the early 1930s, based on the Heinkel He 49 of the late 1920s, featured elegant fuselage lines. However, its 550-horsepower BMW engine was already outdated, and its armament consisted of only two 7,92 mm MG 17 machine guns firing rifle cartridges.

At the very beginning of the war, the Republic enjoyed an advantage in aircraft, both quantitatively and qualitatively, thanks to assistance from the Soviet Union. Corum notes that the Soviet I-15 and I-16 (colloquially known as the "Donkey") were superior to the best German and Italian fighters and ensured the Republicans air superiority from approximately the fall of 1936 to the spring of 1937. Corum notes that the I-15 was roughly equal to the Italian Fiat CR.32 and superior to the He 51 in performance. Corum also calls the I-16 one of the most advanced fighters of the mid-1930s.

The old Heinkel He 51 proved inferior to the Soviet I-15 and I-16 and was so ineffective as a fighter that it was converted into a close air support aircraft. The irony was that it was precisely in this role that the He 51 proved quite useful.

In other words, even after the formation of the Condor Legion, the Republicans retained air superiority on the Madrid Front in the winter of 1936–1937. The situation changed when the Germans began using the new Messerschmitt Bf 109 fighter. During the Brunete Offensive in the summer of 1937, when the Bf 109 first encountered I-15s and I-16s, Corum wrote of the Bf 109's decisive superiority in aerial combat. Its appearance enabled the Nationalists to regain air superiority over the combat zone.

That is, the Republicans were not hopelessly inferior technically, as some historians claim: in late 1936 and early 1937, Soviet technology even provided them with significant, and on some fronts, decisive, air superiority. However, the Germans used the war in Spain as a laboratory for organizational and tactical improvements to the Luftwaffe and quickly offset the Republicans' initial technical advantage.

Corum considers the organization of communications and logistics equally important. The communications battalion allowed for the establishment of forward command posts linked by telephone and radio to airfields and ground headquarters. An effective fuel and ammunition supply system allowed the Condor Legion, despite its relatively small size, to carry out up to four or more combat sorties per day during the most intense periods of operations.

Conclusion


Overall, Corum's work is built around a fairly clear idea: The significance of the Condor Legion lay not so much in the scale of German participation, but in the quality of its organization, equipment, training, and interaction between aviation and ground forces.

The German contingent was relatively small and never constituted an independent army. But it possessed several systemic advantages: a trained officer corps and staffs; a unified doctrine of air-ground cooperation; modern communications and command and control systems; effective logistics and maintenance; the ability to concentrate air power in a decisive sector; a combination of air superiority, battlefield isolation, and close infantry support; and constant experimentation with new equipment and tactics.

In doing so, Corum effectively charts the evolution of German aerial warfare: from the improvised Ju 52 and obsolete He 51 in 1936 to the Bf 109, He 111, Do 17, and Ju 87, to a sophisticated reconnaissance, communications, and close air support system by 1938. He therefore presents the Spanish War not simply as an episode of foreign intervention, but as a practical laboratory for the Luftwaffe, where organizational decisions and tactics were tested that would later find application in World War II.

References
[1] James S. Corum. Legion Condor 1936–39: The Luftwaffe develops Blitzkrieg in the Spanish Civil War. Published by Osprey Publishing, 2020.
[2] Christopher C. Locksley, “Condor over Spain: The Civil War, Combat Experience and the Development of Luftwaffe Airpower Doctrine,” Civil Wars, vol. 2, no. 1 (1999), pp. 69–99.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    23 September 2026 07: 19
    Victor, thank you! Concise, informative, and to the point.
    С James I It's an interesting story, actually, to hit a ship with a bomb from a non-specialized aircraft, without any special training, not from a dive, and especially in conditions of anti-aircraft artillery countermeasures - that's worth a lot.
    1. +1
      23 September 2026 08: 42
      Jaime I has an interesting story in general,
      Nothing interesting there. The ship was destroyed not by bombing, but by an internal explosion, like our "Temperatritsa Maria."
      1. +2
        23 September 2026 08: 58
        It was he who died later, in Cartagena.
      2. +1
        25 September 2026 02: 11
        This was a murky story—either sabotage (the ship was poorly guarded, and anyone could be seen wandering around it, especially since it was undergoing repairs after an air raid) or the carelessness of the anarchists who made up the majority of the crew, who were working with a blowtorch on the bulkhead next to the powder magazine. Future Admiral of the Fleet Kuznetsov (who had served as a naval adviser in Spain) claimed in "Meetings on the Far Meridian" that the anarchist sailors were irresponsibly smoking in the cellar. However, naturally, no one was able to provide evidence to confirm or refute such an accusation. Yes
    2. 0
      25 September 2026 01: 59
      The air defense of the Spanish battleships (both the Jaime I and her sister ships) was little better than nonexistent. Browning machine guns and three 3-inch anti-aircraft guns could hardly be considered serious countermeasures. True, the Hispania was eventually re-armed with German 20mm machine guns in 36, while the Jaime faced the Civil War with what it had. This is why she suffered, although it is believed that the damage inflicted by two bombing runs from improvised "bombers" was relatively light. No.
      1. 0
        25 September 2026 02: 11
        Well, the naval air defense of the Interbellum, and to some extent of the early WWII, was pretty mediocre. On the other hand:
        The superiority of the Republican fleet in the straits between Africa and mainland Spain created serious difficulties for the Nationalists - the anti-aircraft batteries of the Jaime I fired at German transport planes flying over the ship, forcing them to gain greater altitude,

        So the Germans took it into account. And, I repeat, the bombers themselves, and the planes (not even bombers, but conversions; as a rule, nothing worthwhile ever came out of such a collective farm), and the people (lack of experience bombing naval targets) were kind of so-so, but there you go.
  2. +1
    23 September 2026 07: 25
    At the very beginning of the war, the Republic had an advantage in aircraft, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
    The Republic had a lot of different aircraft junk
    1. +1
      23 September 2026 10: 09
      Did the enemy have any better old stuff? At first, they used whatever they could find in the dumps, then our guys and the Germans arrived, and the fighting began on equal terms.
      1. +1
        23 September 2026 16: 14
        First came the Italians.
        Summer 1936 of the year.
        The first 12 FIAT CR-32 fighters arrived in disassembled form at the port of Melilla (Spanish Morocco) on August 13, 1936.
        They were assembled at the nearby Nodor airfield and flown to Tablada near Seville, from where they began flying combat sorties. On August 20, the Italians shot down the first Republican aircraft in this area, a Nieuport 52.
        The first Soviet I-15s arrived in Spain on October 13, 1936.
        On November 4, I-15 fighters took off to defend Madrid.
  3. +3
    23 September 2026 10: 08
    The BF 109 did not have any significant advantage over the I16.
    1. +2
      23 September 2026 11: 29
      Emily had, but they only appeared there towards the end.
    2. +3
      23 September 2026 16: 36
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      The BF 109 did not have any significant advantage over the I16.

      In a tabular sense, yes. But when we moved to hardware, nuances began to emerge...
      Mikhail Onishchenko, in his report, among the list of the I-16's shortcomings, emphasized: "I especially remind you once again that the armament needs to be improved, since from experience I can say that I, and other pilots, have never had a case where 2-3 machine guns (highlighted by the author) did not fail in combat, and without them, it is no fun to fight."
      However, this wasn't the most serious problem. All the M-25V engines installed on the newly arrived aircraft suffered from a serious defect. Nikolai Glushenkov noted that the M-25A and M-25V engines installed on the new fighters failed after 8-12 hours of operation: "The main connecting rod bushing gets drilled through, and the engines fail, with all the consequences." Brigade commander advisor A.P. Andreyev agreed with this assessment: "An extremely difficult situation has developed with the M-25 engines for the I-16 and I-15, and this situation worsened after the August shipment of I-16s with M-25V engines arrived. Due to design and manufacturing flaws, these engines proved insufficiently robust for combat operations, where full engine power is generally used... In a short period of time, 26 of these new engines failed, and the rest are gradually failing..."
      The document, titled “Combat use of the Air Force in the last period of the war in Spain” and which appeared in the bowels of the Red Army Air Force in 1939, sadly states: “In August-September 1938, there were many accidents of new engines. The pilots became afraid to fly on planes with these engines. In each flight, engines were handed over in battle, but there was nothing to replace bad engines. The pilots experienced this very hard, because they knew that some of their comrades died in battle, according to assumptions, only because of the surrender of the engine in battle ""

      © In the sky of Spain.
  4. +1
    23 September 2026 11: 16
    Thanks to the author for the article! Spain was a testing ground back then, and many soldiers from different countries passed through...
  5. 0
    23 September 2026 11: 47
    Victor, thanks for the interesting article! Everything was spot on (the photos could have been captioned).
  6. +1
    23 September 2026 12: 18
    Corum notes that the Soviet I-15 and I-16 aircraft (colloquially known as the "Donkey")...

    In fact, the I-16 was the world's first monoplane fighter. It first flew on December 30, 1933, and was shown at the May Day parade the following year.
    They constantly write: donkeys, donkeys, "rats." They repeat it mindlessly. Why not consider why the USSR lost its leadership in aircraft manufacturing in the late 30s?
    Writing about World War II based on English-language sources results in something that veers toward fiction. Facts and figures are scarce. There's no analysis. How many Soviet aircraft fought in Spain, in which regions, and what was the daily number of sorties? It's impossible to compare ours with the Germans or assess the impact of their efforts, other than their valuable assistance in transporting troops from Morocco...
    And then, how many Luftwaffe pilots passed through Spain? A mere handful. It's hardly fair to say that Spain allowed the Germans to train experienced personnel. Apparently, the British were accustomed to blaming the Germans' successes in 1940 on Spanish experience, avoiding serious analysis...
    1. +4
      23 September 2026 12: 42
      Quote: Andrew_andr
      In fact, the I-16 was the world's first monoplane fighter.

      Come on!
      The Fokker EI (1915, Germany) was the world's first mass-produced monoplane fighter, which saw combat in World War I. It was the first to use a synchronizer, allowing a machine gun to fire through a rotating propeller.
      1. +2
        23 September 2026 14: 16
        Then there's the Morane Saulnier G, a monoplane from 1912. Although it was a one-off. The Fokker is its modernization.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        23 September 2026 17: 59
        Okay, let's say "the world's first wood-and-metal production monoplane with retractable landing gear." More than 6000 were built before the war, compared to 54 of your "braced monoplanes," meaning those with a cable-supported structure and a top speed of no more than 134 km/h.
        The point isn't that Polikarpov invented the monoplane, but rather that it was implemented using existing engines... Engine power increased, which meant the load on the structure also increased – in those days, the engine determined the aircraft's design... Now, things are more complicated. However, we've already compared aircraft enough, so why not discuss something new: for example, the obvious success and obvious decline in aircraft production in the USSR in the 30s.
        This is not entirely off-topic, because Spain was, of course, a very important factor...
        1. +1
          23 September 2026 18: 11
          Quote: Andrew_andr
          Okay, let's say then "the world's first wood-metal production monoplane"

          First in the world all-metal The German Junkers DI became a monoplane fighter

          Quote: Andrew_andr
          with retractable landing gear

          This is certainly a bold move, but retractable landing gear only came into full use in the late 1930s. Before then, both fighters and bombers were perfectly capable of flying with retractable landing gear.
          Quote: Andrew_andr
          However, we've already compared aircraft enough, so why not discuss something new: for example, the obvious success and obvious decline in aircraft manufacturing in the USSR in the 30s.

          It's a very multifaceted topic that I'm not very good at. requestThere are a lot of factors involved, starting with engines, lack of (aluminum shortage), internal politics (repressions) and behind-the-scenes intrigues.
          1. 0
            23 September 2026 18: 28
            There's no information about this Junkers ever seeing action as a fighter. It wasn't deployed in that capacity. It only fought in the Baltics, a few of them, as a reconnaissance aircraft or an improvised ground attack aircraft. Its fate echoed that of many projects from the 40s: cutting-edge ideas, flawed concepts, poor execution. Hunnish madness.
            It turns out that the idea of ​​a monoplane fighter was swept under the rug, and only in the USSR did they begin to work on it - a paradox.
            1. 0
              23 September 2026 19: 38
              Born a bit late request
              Only 41 examples of this aircraft were produced. Despite its excellent strength and protection characteristics, the aircraft arrived too late to have a significant impact on the course of the air war.
    2. +2
      23 September 2026 14: 54
      Quote: Andrew_andr
      It can hardly be said that Spain allowed the Germans to train experienced personnel.
      Galand and Mölders...the pillars of German fighter aviation
      1. +1
        23 September 2026 18: 42
        I was referring to the mass training of personnel—I didn't specify that... Yes, Galland, Mölders—but they dealt with battlefield issues. As for conceptual issues, the only one the Germans brilliantly addressed was Wever.
        It's interesting to compare the fates of our "Spaniards" and those of the Germans. Ours were much more strongly promoted: Smushkevich, Rychagov, Stern, and others. But what was the result? It's unclear.
        Since Wever, the Germans have been at a standstill on all conceptual issues. They've only resolved the issue of supporting troops in the land theater, and even then, only just. It's a long and complex discussion.
  7. +3
    23 September 2026 12: 48
    I-16 (colloquially known as "Donkey")

    "Donkey" is our name. If my sclerosis serves me right, the Republicans called it "Chatos" (snub-nosed), the Nationalists - "Rata" (rat).
    1. +2
      25 September 2026 02: 16
      The Spaniards called the I-15 "Chatos" (snub-nosed), and the I-16 "Moscas" (fly, or something similar). The Germans gave the "donkey" the nickname "Ratte" (rat).
  8. +1
    23 September 2026 13: 45
    The Bf 109's superior flight characteristics gave it significant advantages over previous generations of fighters. The aircraft was highly maneuverable and possessed effective firepower.

    Firepower? Where did it come from? Compared to the I-16 in Spain, the two MG machine guns on the Messerschmitt had a lower rate of fire than the two ShKAS machine guns on the Ishak. The engines were equally powerful, but the I-16 completed a combat turn 10 seconds faster, and experienced pilots could maneuver and get on the Messerschmitt's tail. Ours was let down by the tactics of three fighters against a leader and wingman pair, as mentioned in the article. But in WWII, our pilots, even in the I-153, successfully shot down the more advanced Friedrichs and Gustavs. Ours simply lacked the speed to intercept the bombers.
  9. +2
    23 September 2026 14: 11
    Other combat aircraft also entered service, including the Ju 87 Stuka dive bomber, which was to play a major role in World War II.

    Yes, this dive bomber played a major role in the rout of our troops at the beginning of the war. The Il-2, when it entered service, lacked such capabilities. The heavy and unmaneuverable attack aircraft with its liquid-cooled engine was a ready target for cannon-laden Messerschmitts and rapid-fire small-caliber Oerlikons. The Su-2, with its air-cooled engine, was superior, but management hesitated to halt production. Even the I-153 attack aircraft variant was much better than the Il-2 in terms of survivability during ground attack. It could even perform a virtually vertical dive, and two Chaikas with RS-82 rockets fired a salvo like a Katyusha BM-8, and with much better aim than the Il-2. Moreover, they didn't need fighter cover. And they dealt with anti-aircraft artillery with the right tactics—launching rockets with preset fuse ranges of 400 and 800 meters above the anti-aircraft crews from a low altitude, allowing them to turn around in time. And how our I-16 fighters from the 131st Air Regiment routed a Romanian cavalry division near Odessa...
    1. +1
      23 September 2026 22: 29
      "Even the I-153 attack aircraft variant was much better than the Il-2 in terms of survivability during ground attack missions. It could even perform a virtually vertical dive, and two Chaikas with RS-82 rockets fired a salvo like a Katyusha BM-8, and with very good aim, unlike the Il-2." I completely agree, I read that too. The engine is air-cooled, maneuverable, and faster than the Hs-123 attack aircraft.
      1. 0
        24 September 2026 12: 04
        Excuse me, but how could a discontinued plywood biplane possibly compare to armadas of armored attack aircraft? Don't confuse a sniper with suppressive fire from a hundred machine guns. I personally wouldn't give a dime for it.
        1. 0
          24 September 2026 15: 33
          Quote: ex_paragon
          Excuse me, but how could a discontinued plywood biplane possibly compare to armadas of armored attack aircraft? Don't confuse a sniper with suppressive fire from a hundred machine guns. I personally wouldn't give a dime for it.


          Survival statistics are relentless: three times as many ground attack sorties before being shot down, so keep the rest. And the Il-2's armor is only resistant to rifle-caliber bullets. Its maneuverability and air-cooled engine are superior to the armor of a ground attack aircraft, and it also has the ability to dive vertically instead of the Il-2's 30-degree angle. In 43, at the request of air division commander Nemtsovich, Khudyakov and Bulganin wrote a letter to Stalin requesting the resumption of production of the I-16 and I-153. These fighters had proven more effective as ground attack aircraft than the Il-2, though they were intended to be used for their intended purpose as well, not just as ground attack aircraft.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. 0
                25 September 2026 07: 37
                Maybe we should get some facts? I don't understand your commitment to plywood.
                1. 0
                  25 September 2026 07: 44
                  Quote: ex_paragon
                  Maybe we should get some facts? I don't understand your commitment to plywood.

                  What facts do you need? Lines from the memoirs of G.A. Rechkalov or from awards
                  And it's not plywood, but delta wood and percale with varnish. It's just that where they made this "plywood," in your opinion, they started making LaGGs, and then LAs made of the same plywood. That's why they stopped producing it.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                2. 0
                  25 September 2026 09: 24
                  Quote: ex_paragon
                  Maybe we should get some facts? I don't understand your commitment to plywood.

                  Will this fact be acceptable?

                  To improve the combat performance of the Red Army Air Forces' fighter-attack aircraft, a small batch of new RBS-82 and RBS-132 rockets was manufactured by the end of 1939. These rockets had improved accuracy and, most importantly, high armor penetration and explosive effect. However, the explosive effect was delayed somewhat after the projectile had penetrated the armor.

                  From January to June 1940, the 5th Fighter Aviation Regiment of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet Air Force conducted tests of RBS-82 shells against ship armor, fired from dive bombers at 60–70° angles from fighter aircraft. One I-16 Type 10 and one I-153 aircraft, along with several crews, were assigned to the tests from the 5th Fighter Aviation Regiment.

                  At the test site, slabs of ship-grade cemented armor of varying thicknesses from 30 to 60 mm were laid out on the ground. Fighters dived from altitudes of 4500–5000 m, firing their rockets from a distance of 700–800 m.

                  Despite the systematic errors made by the pilots, the percentage of hits on the armor plates was quite high - about 14% of the shells hit the plates and in many cases penetrated plates up to 50 mm thick, provided that the angles of impact did not differ significantly from 90°.

                  More extensive aerial firing tests of the RBS-82 and RBS-132 projectiles were conducted at the Air Force Research Institute of Pneumatic Anti-Aircraft Weapons in June–August 1941. The results were also positive. However, the question of mass production remained undecided.

                  If you say that the Il-2 used RS, then I will say that it used it, but it did not hit, unlike the "plywood" biplane, which had a standard sight for RS
                  1. 0
                    25 September 2026 09: 48
                    Does PBP 1 and VV 1 mean anything to you? Although, who am I...
                    1. 0
                      25 September 2026 09: 54
                      Quote: ex_paragon
                      Does PBP 1 and VV 1 mean anything to you? Although, who am I...

                      It was a miracle, but the sighting device was primitive, the pilots came up with it themselves
                      1. The comment was deleted.
  10. 0
    24 September 2026 20: 28
    West of the city of Gijón, located in northern Spain on the Atlantic coast, lies the municipality of Carreño, where a military airfield was located in the area of ​​El Valle during the Spanish Civil War of 1936–1936. The airfield was built from stones transported by stonecutters from as far away as Llanes in eastern Asturias. A ceramic plaque commemorating the site remains to this day. The airfield housed Russian pilots and aircraft, who were to assist the Asturian Red Army in the fight against Galician columns, in supporting the siege of Oviedo, and in defending Gijón and the important seaport of El Mucel from Nationalist air attacks originating from the Virgen del Camino airfield in León. The command and residence of the officers and pilots was located in the Díaz-Caneja Palace; The runway was just over half a kilometer long.
    The first attacks on the airfield were carried out by German aircraft flying at high altitude, causing little damage. As the war progressed, Nationalist ships began to shell El Musel, while Russian aircraft and pilots tried to push them back as far as possible. German attacks on the airfield grew increasingly intense, and as the Republican Air Force weakened, the strikes became increasingly accurate; German aircraft began attacking from ever lower altitudes, even resorting to machine-gun fire during low flights. In their heroism, the Russian pilots fought to the last drop of fuel, and during the fierce fighting, some even crashed before landing. Even local residents in their eighties still remember the legendary Russian "flies" – the Polikarpov I-15 and I-16 aircraft, as well as other aircraft of the Spanish Republicans.
    More than fifty people – pilots, assistants, mechanics, gunners, workers, cooks, etc. – worked at a frantic pace.
    It should be remembered that Asturias, the last of the northern provinces to fall, with the exception of eastern Cantabria, was surrounded by enemies; it had also previously suffered greatly during the "Red Revolution" of 1934, when it was left alone to face the Legion and the Spanish army, abandoned by the other provinces. Its meager air defenses—the Republican central command supplied Asturias with virtually no weapons—consisted of two guns: one fixed, mounted on the slope of Mount Areo, which divides Gijón and Carreño in a north-south direction from the sea to Llanera, towards Oviedo, and the other mobile, mounted on a truck, which was often stationed at the airfield itself.
    After the capture of Bilbao and the betrayal of the Basque nationalists, which led to the fall of Santander, the Asturian Red Army managed to hold off the Francoist army, significantly outgunned and outnumbered and supported by Italian and German air power, for three weeks in the epic battle of El Mazuku. When the airfield fell, the nationalists captured only one Russian aircraft—a Letov S-231.
  11. 0
    24 September 2026 20: 39
    A list dated 1936 in Gijón lists the names of Russian pilots stationed in Llanes: Andrushin, Nezamutinov, Kirushin, Kurigin, Pavlovich, and Toranchenko. All or some of them likely defended their homeland in the subsequent conflict with Germany. The same can be said of Mikhailov, who, piloting a Mosca, was forced to abandon La Albericia airfield in Santander in late August 1937 in the face of Franco's advance to join the Republican Air Force at its base in Llanes.
  12. 0
    24 September 2026 22: 57
    Teaching the Germans anything in a small regional conflict would only spoil their performance. They had ample experience in World War I, and the German Air Force was led by aces like Goering and Udet. They had come to that war as transporters of troops and weapons on then-modern transport aircraft. The ones who had to learn practically from scratch were the Russians and Spaniards, who had no experience of a major war. The Condor Legion didn't have the best record in that war, and the lead here belongs to the Italians, flying the best fighter of the conflict, the Fiat, with a claimed victory of around 1000 aircraft. The German aces also had a modest record of 10-15 victories compared to the Spanish Falangists, who claimed 40 victories per ace. Our forces had it tough, but many fought bravely despite poor equipment and organization. It was not for nothing that Rychagov declared to Stalin that "we are fighting on graves." Unfortunately, however, some of our pilots were frankly weak, not only in skill but also in spirit. At first, some pilots refused to be sent on tours, which was quickly resolved, but then there were cases of flight to France and refusal to fight in Spain itself. Fortunately, most of our pilots actually fought and developed into true world-class aces. It's no wonder Vorozheikin learned to fight in Mongolia from our best aces, who had developed many original aerial combat techniques. Perhaps the famous "Vorozheikin slide"—drifting around the wing of an enemy bomber—was learned from our Spanish pilots.
    1. 0
      25 September 2026 08: 46
      Quote: geologist
      It was not for nothing that Rychagov declared to Stalin that “we are fighting on graves.”

      The famous phrase was inspired by the tragedy of early 41, which was being investigated at the time. Rychagov understood why three aircraft (the then-new DB-3As) crashed during an air regiment's flight from Novosibirsk to Tashkent, two more crashed, and 12 people died. The DB-3 is an Il-4, one of the most inept aircraft... but the intrigues of Ilyushin and Yakovlev... The pilots also rejected the Il-2; they wanted the Su-2 as a ground-attack aircraft, but they weren't consulted, and the Il-2 was put into production.
  13. 0
    25 September 2026 01: 43
    In fact, the Condor Legion was a more diverse "unit," encompassing not only a predominantly air force with all its supporting services (from air defense to military medicine and meteorology), but also tank crews (the "Immer" team—a beekeeper) and sailors (the "Nordsee" group—North Sea). True, the latter's actions were far more modest than those of the German pilots, who covered themselves in "unfading glory" in Spain (one need only recall Guernica), but they too contributed to Franco's victory and the collapse of the Spanish Republic. sad