Military Review

"Grad Sviyazhsk" in the completion

46
In the community “We carry the St. Andrew’s flag” of the VKontakte web resource, a photo of the 21631 (Buyan-M) project’s small rocket ship Grad Sviyazhsk appeared, which was being completed afloat at the A. Zelenodolsk Shipbuilding Plant named after A.M. Gorky. The ship (building number 631) was laid down at the 27 plant on August 2010 of the year and launched without wide publicity on 9 March 2013. The transfer of "The City of Sviyazhsk" is scheduled for 2013 year, and judging by the picture, the ship is already in a high degree of readiness.


A total of five ships of this type are being built in Zelenodolsk for the Russian Navy. The contract for the construction of the lead small rocket ship of the 21631 project (the future Grada Sviyazhsk) was signed by OAO Zelenodolsk Shipbuilding Plant named after AM Gorky with the Russian Ministry of Defense 28 in May 2010. In addition to Grad Sviyazhsk, the company currently has four other ordered ships, Uglich (building number 632, laid 22 on July 2011 of the year, launched 10 on April 2013,), Veliky Ustyug (building number 633, laid 27 August 2011 of the year), "Green Dol" (building number 634, laid 29 August 2012 of the year) and "Serpukhov" (building number 635, laid 25 January 2013 of the year).

"Grad Sviyazhsk" in the completion

The head small rocket ship of the 21631 project "Grad Sviyazhsk" in afloat is building up at the Zelenodolsk Shipbuilding Plant named after A.M. Gorky. Zelenodolsk, May 2013 of the year
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
46 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 4 June 2013 11: 04 New
    10
    In total, a series of five ships of this type is being built for the Russian Navy in Zelenodolsk
    Five times is great news ...
    1. Rustam
      Rustam 4 June 2013 11: 25 New
      +8
      Excellent ship

      For actions in the coastal zone, you don’t need anything more, and Zelenodoltsy keep pace
      this is not a Sev shipyard where ships of 2 tons turn into long-term construction for many years (for 8 or more years)

      Zelenodoltsy also handed over two ships to Vietnam and completed the flogman of the Caspian flotilla of Dagestan

      The previous 3 ships, the previous Buyan project, were built by the St. Petersburg company Almaz, the ships serve in the Caspian.
  2. Arberes
    Arberes 4 June 2013 11: 06 New
    +8
    For the Caspian, soon it will be possible not to worry!
    In general, well done GREENMERS! But the tonnage of products must be increased!
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 4 June 2013 11: 24 New
      +7
      Damn this is the Caspian much more then. Especially according to Western classification, this MRC is just a corvette.
      1. Arberes
        Arberes 4 June 2013 11: 36 New
        +5
        Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
        Damn this is the Caspian much more then. Especially according to Western classification, this MRC is just a corvette.

        An update of the Caspian flotilla should occur. Old ships and boats for scrapping, new with a needle in the ranks! And then Zelenodolsky shipbuilding can execute orders not only for the Caspian!
        Production is debugged, excellent equipment and staff!
        The Caspian region is really serious, WE must dominate there!
        1. Bronis
          Bronis 4 June 2013 12: 06 New
          +5
          So the Caspian flotilla is already significantly updated. Two guard cheetahs 2003 and 2012. MAK - from 4 pcs. - Three new "Buyana". AT
          On the whole, quite age-old missile and artillery boats (total of 8 or 9 units), but they are likely to be changed to “Buyany-M” (for now, plans for 5 units). The replacement is not direct - the tonnage and armament of the Buyans are larger. Landing boats: relatively fresh Chamois. The Dugongs began to arrive.
          And Zelenodolsk is going to work not only for the Caspian
          1. Arberes
            Arberes 4 June 2013 12: 35 New
            +3
            Quote: Bronis
            quite age rocket and artillery boats

            This is what I mean! drinks
            4-5 units is enough !?
            1. Bronis
              Bronis 4 June 2013 13: 32 New
              +2
              Enough or not - a question for the competent circles. In general, due to the Buyanov-M, the flotilla’s strike capabilities will increase. Boats there (rocket) 206 project. Two missiles P-15M + AK-176 + AK-630. About 250 t. Displacement. Artillery boats - BM-14 (MLRS) + Gun from PT-76, some anti-aircraft artillery. Displacement less than 100 tons.
              "Buyan-M" is an MRK, can be classified as a corvette - about 1000 tons. 8 PU for Caliber or Onyx. Impact weapons cannot be compared. Autonomy is higher and seaworthiness is better. Iran generally recently called a ship similar in size a destroyer ... but this is politics. And the 5 series, most likely, will not be limited. We have problems with building larger ships. "Buyans" is already in the series. Perhaps soon we will see them at the Black Sea Fleet. A series of 10-15 ships can and will be. 5 pcs - are under construction.
        2. alex13-61
          alex13-61 4 June 2013 12: 11 New
          +4
          Quote: Arberes
          An update of the Caspian flotilla should occur.

          About the Black Sea Fleet, too, do not forget ... The Turks now have a fleet of ....
  3. PROXOR
    PROXOR 4 June 2013 11: 14 New
    +9
    NOT BAD, NOT BAD !!!
  4. mizantropi
    mizantropi 4 June 2013 11: 19 New
    +5
    The Caspian region is very important for Russia. both geopolitically and from the point of view of the economy (hydrocarbons, bioresources, transport, trade, etc.) Strengthening the fleet in the Caspian, in our turbulent time, is a very correct policy.
    1. queen
      queen 4 June 2013 11: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: mizantrop
      The Caspian region is very important for Russia.

      We and they need resources, but to protect and preserve us.
  5. Trailer
    Trailer 4 June 2013 11: 22 New
    13
    BEAUTY! Looking forward to a friendship visit!
  6. queen
    queen 4 June 2013 11: 33 New
    +2
    I agree, they need more ... the adversaries are not asleep, and the country is huge.
    1. Arberes
      Arberes 4 June 2013 11: 47 New
      +4
      Quote: regin
      the adversaries are not asleep, and the country is huge.

      Let the adversaries sleep sweetly
      Our Fleet RUSSIAN will be updated!

      NATO wakes up, in the throat drawbar
      RUSSIAN Frigates-went to the seas!

      I hope the destroyers will come out in the near future!
      regin -I greet you hi drinks
  7. sub307
    sub307 4 June 2013 11: 34 New
    +3
    I don’t remember: a caliber complex is provided for 21631? Nice kind of complex. Potential “adversaries” in the Caspian seem to have no analogues.
  8. queen
    queen 4 June 2013 11: 39 New
    +1
    There is no analogue of RUSSIAN, now let's look at Europe)))))))))
  9. Vtel
    Vtel 4 June 2013 11: 40 New
    +2
    Judging by the raids of the Wild West, it’s very necessary to go to the Caspian now, it will soon smell fried.
  10. sub307
    sub307 4 June 2013 11: 41 New
    +4
    Yeah ... All in stock
    Armament is good if it will "plow" without problems:
    Artillery
    1 × 100 mm AU A-190 Universal, 2 machine gun mounts 14,5 mm, 3 machine gun mounts 7,62 mm
    Flak
    1 30-mm ZAK AK-630M-2 "Duet"

    Missile weapons
    1 × 8 Caliber or Onyx
    2 launchers 3M-47 "Bending" with SAM "Needle" or "Needle
    1. seller trucks
      seller trucks 4 June 2013 14: 19 New
      +3
      Quote: sub307
      1 30-mm ZAK AK-630M-2 "Duet"


      Prokopenko in "Military Secret" talked about this thing, handsome
      1. rugor
        rugor 4 June 2013 16: 43 New
        0
        In what issue, tell me, pzhst?
        1. Curculum
          Curculum 4 June 2013 17: 54 New
          0
          Quote: rugor
          In what issue, tell me, pzhst?

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10X5DA-0wik
  11. shamil
    shamil 4 June 2013 11: 43 New
    +2
    triple ur! Hooray! Hooray!
    1. Reserve buildbat
      Reserve buildbat 4 June 2013 11: 47 New
      +3
      Fivefold smile
  12. sub307
    sub307 4 June 2013 11: 48 New
    +3
    This is what was meant: Unlike its prototype, a small artillery ship of project 21630, the MRK has almost twice as much displacement (949 tons against 500 tons) and is armed with a vertical launcher of the 3R-14UKSK complex for 8 anti-ship missiles Caliber ”Or“ Onyx ”, allowing to strike with precision-guided cruise missiles at both sea and ground targets.
    In general, the "Caspian adversaries" - "Karachun."
    1. bor187
      bor187 4 June 2013 11: 58 New
      0
      Will all 5 RTOs be in the Caspian?
      1. PLO
        PLO 4 June 2013 12: 16 New
        +2
        Buyan-M only for the Caspian.
        for other TVDs, the lack of PLO is a big drawback
        1. Trailer
          Trailer 4 June 2013 12: 56 New
          0
          Quote: olp
          Buyan-M only for the Caspian.
          for other TVDs, the lack of PLO is a big drawback
          Do you think Iran will not develop a submarine fleet in the Caspian?
          1. Alexey Prikazchikov
            Alexey Prikazchikov 4 June 2013 13: 06 New
            +1
            And where there will be uh belay to swim? wassat
            1. Vanya Ivanov
              Vanya Ivanov 4 June 2013 15: 44 New
              0
              The Caspian is not at all a small sea with decent depths and submarines in the old days of the USSR were there.
        2. Army1
          Army1 4 June 2013 14: 01 New
          +1
          Quote: olp
          Buyan-M only for the Caspian.

          The World Cup of the Russian Navy will receive them, too.
          1. PLO
            PLO 4 June 2013 15: 00 New
            +1
            The World Cup of the Russian Navy will receive them, too.

            I doubt ..
            in any case, I really hope not.
            such ships on the Black Sea Fleet and other fleets are not needed.
            poor seaworthiness, lack of anti-aircraft defense and weak anti-aircraft weapons.

            I really hope that they will build 3 more ships for the Caspian Sea (except for these 5) and end on this
            and then they will begin to build one new OVR corvette, in exchange for our RTOs and IPC
  13. Orel
    Orel 4 June 2013 12: 27 New
    +1
    It’s good, of course, what they are building, BUT 2 YEARS ON THE SHIP WITH A LOWER UNIT OF LESS THAN 1 tons? It is clear that after the devastation of the 000s, we are learning to build ships again, but somehow we need to do something about it ...
  14. Andrey57
    Andrey57 4 June 2013 12: 35 New
    0
    Anti-submarine weapons are also necessary - Iran already has small submarines in the Caspian.
  15. Kinsman
    Kinsman 4 June 2013 12: 41 New
    +2
    How nice to read and learn such news !!! More to such !!!
  16. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 4 June 2013 12: 58 New
    +3
    Grad Sviyazhsk is the first production ship. And the head one is Uglich. Both ships should be part of the CFL this year. There is also a contract for the construction of three more ships of this type. On the forum, these ships are for some reason called coastal. However, these guys can deliver high-precision strikes within a radius of 1500 km (and according to some reports - 2500 km). While in the Caspian Sea, RTOs are keeping an eye on the whole of Iran and most of Turkey. I'm not talking about such trifles as Georgia, Azerbaijan, etc. So these boats can be put on a par with the Iskander (in terms of its R-500 cruise missile), and, to some extent, with the Tu-95 and Tu-160 (in the X-555 part)
    1. little man
      little man 4 June 2013 13: 16 New
      -1
      It is coastal. Although the armament is not bad, but autonomy is small for 10 days, it is not important for fuel or food. And even in a serious storm it’s fun to fall on it!
  17. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 4 June 2013 13: 46 New
    0
    Quote: man
    It is coastal. Although the armament is not bad, but autonomy is small for 10 days, it is not important for fuel or food. And even in a serious storm it’s fun to fall on it!

    Columbian caravels had even less displacement. And he was not afraid of storms. Our sailors are no less courageous.
    1. little man
      little man 4 June 2013 14: 06 New
      -2
      It's like that. But it will be just an incompetent air-conditioner. Imagine when one sailor watches for three, the other two greened bodies are confined to a berth. wink
  18. individual
    individual 4 June 2013 15: 01 New
    +1
    We wish the new ship "Grad Sviyazhsk" clean water
    and bright sky under the St. Andrew’s flag of Russia!
  19. Dromac
    Dromac 4 June 2013 16: 28 New
    0
    Good luck to our shipbuilders. Strengthen all fleets as high as possible
  20. homosum20
    homosum20 4 June 2013 16: 32 New
    0
    Great news.
    The Americans ordered 7 destroyers "Arly Burke" to bring their number in the composition to seventy-five. Bullshit.
    Good luck to our shipbuilders.
    Except good luck “Grad ....” against “Arly ....” nothing shines.
    1. mizantropi
      mizantropi 4 June 2013 22: 11 New
      0
      Maybe we will not compare the hell with a finger !? Arly Berkov in the Caspian Sea can never be.
  21. rugor
    rugor 4 June 2013 16: 44 New
    0
    Quote: homosum20
    Except good luck “Grad ....” against “Arly ....” nothing shines.

    Due to numerical superiority or technical?
  22. Billy Bones
    Billy Bones 4 June 2013 17: 01 New
    +1
    The news is certainly not bad, but here are the deadlines ... Laid down in August 2010. Now in the courtyard of 2013. During the same time, the French promise to build the Mistral. You can’t work like that, comrades.
    1. Uncle Lyosha
      Uncle Lyosha 4 June 2013 20: 33 New
      +1
      Dear, the above-mentioned period is a little inaccurate; if you throw away from it the time that the building was in the workshop (without work on it), it will come out just a year and 3 months. In general, as an employee of this enterprise, I’ll say that the ship is rather damp in the design sense, the design bureau is slightly modified. The highest command likes the ship for its relatively small dimensions with such weapons, and the team will have to get used to these very “small dimensions” honestly I’ll say a bit crowded on the ship, too squeezed a lot there.
  23. Comrade1945
    Comrade1945 4 June 2013 20: 30 New
    -1
    You, of course, don’t get me wrong, friends, but it seems to me that the name of the ship went too far ...
  24. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 5 June 2013 13: 18 New
    0
    In my opinion, the use of weapons on these ships is provided for up to 5 points, so that with seaworthiness they are doing well. Due to cramped space, the old MRK type Mirage has something more or seaworthiness. I think 10 pcs. on the Black Sea Fleet is quite out of place.