Military Review

The age limit for serving in the Ministry of Defense officers will increase by five years

30
The age limit for serving in the Ministry of Defense officers will increase by five yearsColonel-General Viktor Goremykin, head of the Personnel Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Russia, said on Saturday that the age limit for serving as officers of the Ministry of Defense will increase by five years. “In the near future, a law prepared by us will appear on the website on the Internet. This is a federal law. We have prepared amendments to article 49-53 of federal law in terms of increasing the age limit for military service. We add five years to each category, ”he said.


Goremykin recalled that now the age limit before the lieutenant colonel is inclusive - 45 years, for the colonel and captain of the 1 rank - 50, major general, lieutenant general - 55 and colonel general, army general - 60 years.

According to the general, this amendment has now been approved not only by the Ministry of Defense, but also by almost all executive state bodies.

Goremykin did not specify which one, but noted that this is not the Ministry of Finance. “The Ministry of Finance supported us,” he stressed.

The new law was agreed at the Ministry of Justice, at the institute of comparative analysis of legislative activity. “It is almost ready for submission to the government and further consideration in the State Duma,” Goremykin added.

“We do not exclude the possibility of further extension of service (for a new limit, which will be set with amendments),” he continued. General explained that it is assumed that contracts may be made for up to ten years above the existing standards for military service by age.
Originator:
http://voennovosti.ru/
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 4 June 2013 10: 55
    -3
    We add five years to each category, ”he said.

    And why there - right away for life ... what And the generals, admirals and marshals, also posthumously ... + 5 years
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 4 June 2013 11: 03
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      And the generals, admirals and marshals, also posthumously ... + 5 years

      Well, it’s done for the generals, or rather they themselves extended the deadline and that’s it hi Our generals will eventually give press conferences, like Brezhnev laughing
      1. svp67
        svp67 4 June 2013 11: 07
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Our generals will eventually give press conferences, like Brezhnev

        If only military orders were clearly given ....
        1. treskoed
          treskoed 4 June 2013 13: 27
          0
          Quote: svp67
          If only military orders were clearly given ....

          Okay, they would be able to give honor! Well done!
          1. Aleks tv
            Aleks tv 4 June 2013 14: 19
            0
            Quote: treskoed
            Okay, they would be able to give honor! Well done!


            Hm. Vague doubts torment me ... Have you served?
            Treskoed, in the army there is the concept of giving military greetings. At least you wouldn't be understood in the unit.
    2. Nick
      Nick 4 June 2013 11: 07
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      And why there - right away for life ...

      Yeah, for the sake of saving pension savings ... As I understand it, the pension of military personnel is postponed for five years ...
      Although for the Army from experienced specialists IMHO will be useful.
      1. svp67
        svp67 4 June 2013 11: 09
        +1
        Quote: Nick
        Yeah, for the sake of saving pension savings ... As I understand it, the pension of military personnel is postponed for five years ...
        Although for the Army from experienced specialists IMHO will be useful.

        Pensions are several times less than salaries. And how can we serve the youth now? "15 year old captains" will appear again ...
  2. DDW
    DDW 4 June 2013 11: 01
    +4
    Thanks Motherland ... Well, at least in the cemeteries with housing so far no problem ...
    1. Executer
      Executer 4 June 2013 11: 12
      0
      Not everywhere...
    2. Ivan.
      Ivan. 4 June 2013 11: 22
      +1
      Quote: DDW
      Thank you Motherland

      And where does the homeland? The oath sounds - protection from external and internal enemies, if you think that it’s up to politicians to decide what this means and to correctly follow their orders, then make claims to the Homeland, of which we are all part and we must only be presented (we didn’t save, did not protect ) You can betray the homeland, but she herself is not able to betray. Now and for a long time, the Motherland is in danger and it’s not the same thing to blame for this, but that we ourselves did not save ourselves. Now they are trying to deceive experienced commanders, maybe this is to prevent it? It seems that we are talking about the maximum and not mandatory age.
      1. DDW
        DDW 4 June 2013 11: 31
        +2
        And I agree with you. And I will not dispute.
        But the reasons for this decision are inherent in the economic condition of the country and the personnel condition of the army. And hardly anyone does not understand this.
  3. Manager
    Manager 4 June 2013 11: 13
    -4
    For me, not every person after 50 - 55 years old remains in their right mind; this is the first! The second, no matter how experienced the general, he gets used to the situation is already outdated (so to speak, military operations, etc.) because the world is changing very quickly and technology with it.
    So for me, this is not a good idea.
    1. Manager
      Manager 4 June 2013 11: 32
      0
      As I understand it, the 55-year-old general put the minus? Well, comment, please!
    2. Sochi
      Sochi 4 June 2013 13: 15
      +1
      I don’t remember exactly, it seems Napoleon, said - the generals are preparing for the past war ...
  4. avt
    avt 4 June 2013 11: 22
    +9
    The consequences of the reduction of the officer corps and the elimination of recruitment in schools. Fire option.
  5. pinecone
    pinecone 4 June 2013 12: 06
    +5
    everything. First, expel tens of thousands of officers from service, and now extend the age limits.
  6. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 4 June 2013 12: 07
    +1
    Dear Manager! I agree with you that 100% are not at this age, but 98% are adequate.
    These two% are due to those who quit at 45 and did not find their place in civilian life, to our great regret. It's a pity to look at drunken veterans. And about new technologies for "age" commanders
    should prompt deputies and pomps. About divisors in 30 years. We have already passed in the initial period of the Second World War.
    1. Manager
      Manager 4 June 2013 12: 19
      +2
      Quote: a.hamster55
      And about new technologies for "age" commanders
      should prompt deputies and pomps


      The commander must know all his equipment!
      I saw in a terrible dream that general of a rocket launcher that would not be able to direct and launch a cancer.
  7. Grigorich 1962
    Grigorich 1962 4 June 2013 12: 15
    +3
    That's where you were before .... was ready to serve and serve .... and now I have more than a fifty dollars .....
  8. Aleks tv
    Aleks tv 4 June 2013 12: 33
    +9
    As they lured them with their "engines" ... clearly a select mat is now standing in the offices of the barracks.

    I remember my service, all these throwing before leaving.

    The fact is that they are preparing for retirement: to leave in a certain rank and position, so that according to the "grid" everything is fine for calculating the pension. Thinking about the place of residence of the family (city, apartment or house). Place of future work. Purchase of all sorts of summer residences and other living crap. Education of children in schools - institutes.
    YES AND GENERALLY FULL OF FULL !!!
    And here you have a sickle in one place - "serve my friend 5 Godochki, it’s fun to pump up your thoughts and in general."

    In general, many do not mind serving, but here what happens in extreme times:
    “That, damn you, is being cut off, or taken out of state, offering almost sergeant posts with a meager salary, for which only a cat can be fed, and not a wife with two children.”
    - That, hitting you on the head with a statement: serve another 5 years!
    After all, people are not machines, life must be somehow planned: to serve - to serve like that, not to serve - not to serve like that. They kick him like a pug, and then they ask why the officers have no dibylistic-joyful expression ...

    They destroyed the entire education system; several more years are not expected in the troops. Divisions are being restored.
    So they realized that there was no one to serve.
    Ur.dy ... with its own reforms. I have no words.
    1. v53993
      v53993 4 June 2013 12: 50
      +1
      That, hitting you on the head declare: serve another 5 years

      Hmmm, for escaping from the zone give less.
  9. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 4 June 2013 12: 33
    0
    Dear Manager! As always, you are right, I, too, would have perceived a rocket general in the "electric chair" - like a bad dream. What about the duty calculations then? And in fact, the functions of the generals are command and administrative.
  10. AVV
    AVV 4 June 2013 12: 59
    0
    Such as Serdyukov, it is necessary not to increase, but to reduce the age of stay in the service to the maximum !!!
  11. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 4 June 2013 13: 05
    +1
    Quote: AVV
    Such as Serdyukov, it is necessary not to increase, but to reduce the age of stay in the service to the maximum !!!

    Such guys (like Serdyukov) generally need to be poisoned with dust in the bud. And for five years there were rumors before. Now, the retirement period for retired officers will be even shorter. Some of today's timelines do not endure and carry them out of the army forward with their feet.
  12. Sochi
    Sochi 4 June 2013 13: 41
    +1
    45 years, in theory, the heyday, and his retirement ... In vain, let anyone want that report on the table and go on a full retirement. And who wants to serve further, let him serve, only his pension should be much higher, for each year of service after 45 an increase of 10-20% and let him serve at least 60 years old, if health allows and all sports standards will be fulfilled perfectly well , unsuccess - dismissal.
    1. Manager
      Manager 4 June 2013 15: 28
      +1
      So I say a maximum of 50-55. Then I am against.
      1. Sochi
        Sochi 5 June 2013 09: 05
        +1
        Well, why 55, many people and in 60 can give odds to young people, in the sense of knowledge and speed of decision-making (experience affects). And they can also transfer their knowledge, only physically they are not the same as they were before. So let them teach, work at headquarters. Vaughn Kharchevsky is old, and he still flies on fighters!
  13. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 4 June 2013 18: 25
    0
    Dear Manager! And now +. I completely agree!
  14. svp67
    svp67 4 June 2013 18: 36
    0
    Head of the Main Directorate of Personnel of the Ministry of Defense of Russia Colonel General Viktor Goremykin сообщил
    and that's it....
  15. sashka
    sashka 4 June 2013 18: 41
    +2
    Quote: svp67
    Colonel Victor Goremykin reported

    One last name is worth it.))) Apparently there is a problem with the staff.
  16. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 9 June 2013 16: 28
    +1
    Quote: the age limit for serving in the Ministry of Defense officers will increase by five years.
    I read these lines and I can’t believe my eyes. Has anyone calculated how many tens of thousands of young professional officers were dismissed as a result of the Serdyukov reforms? fool Now there is a shortage of officer personnel. How to call such a leadership policy in relation to the officer corps of Russia. I can’t find normal words to explain this disgrace, and other words, unfortunately, are prohibited for use ...
  17. Marconi41
    Marconi41 10 June 2013 10: 39
    0
    The shortage of officers in the near future will be massive. Many military universities were closed, many officers were fired, and as practice shows, they will not return to the army. The reduction of the army has already been suspended and will only increase in the future. Look at how many new ships are laid down and ready to launch - who will go on them? The population growth is also not large, the RFP in the army is no longer small, and there are not many people who want to receive it! Therefore, this decision is both forced and correct!
  18. The comment was deleted.