The Poles wanted two different types of infantry fighting vehicles at once.

5 810 20
The Poles wanted two different types of infantry fighting vehicles at once.

The Polish military is seriously considering acquiring two types of infantry fighting vehicles. The first is the Borsuk light amphibious infantry fighting vehicle, and the second is the Ratel (Honey Badger) heavy vehicle, developed under the Ciężki Bojowy Wóz Piechoty (CBWP) program.

Instead of an introduction


Perhaps we should begin with some background, which can be summarized in a few brief paragraphs. Poland, once a Warsaw Pact member, inherited a significant number of Soviet BMP-1 infantry fighting vehicles (BMP-2s, too, but far fewer than a hundred) after gaining independence and the collapse of the USSR. These vehicles were used for a long time.



However, it's clear that these obsolete vehicles have no prospects for modernization, maintaining combat effectiveness at the required level, or simply for their service life. Therefore, the Poles initiated a program to develop a replacement for these old vehicles, which resulted in the development of the Borsuk IFV—currently in production, and about 15 units have already been delivered to the troops.


Borsuk BMP prototype. 2022

It was packed with everything that global tank design allowed and allows: an unmanned turret with a 30mm Bushmaster II automatic cannon, top-of-the-line sights, communications equipment, modular armor, a powerful 720-horsepower MTU engine with an Allison transmission, and so on. At the same time, it was given buoyancy, while its weight remained at 28 tons.

Naturally, with such weight restrictions, it is impossible to provide powerful armor for the sake of buoyancy and high mobility, so the Borsuk has STANAG level 4 armor, meaning the vehicle can withstand a maximum of 14,5 mm machine gun fire from the front.

Given this situation, the Poles decided to supplement the Borsuk with a second IFV—this one heavier and more armored. It was developed under the Ciężki Bojowy Wóz Piechoty (CBWP) program, and its prototype, produced by Huta Stalowa Wola (HSW), part of the Polish Group of Companies (Polskiej Grupy Zbrojeniowej), was recently unveiled at the MSPO defense exhibition in Kielce, Poland.

Ratel


The prototype of a heavy infantry fighting vehicle, called the Ratel ("Honey Badger"), created using elements and technologies from the Polish self-propelled gun "Crab", turned out to be truly heavy - the manufacturer claims that the vehicle weighs just over 40 tons - this is already more than the weight of a T-64B.

But some analytical portals, including Ukrainian ones, make much bolder predictions, in which the mass of the Honey Badger can reach 42 tons with full armor, which puts the vehicle on par with such heavyweights (not made on tank chassis), like the German IFV "Puma".


They even fitted it with a matching engine—a German MTU 800-kilowatt (just over 1000 hp) with an Allison automatic transmission. In this configuration, the powertrain allows the Honey Badger to reach speeds of up to 65 kilometers per hour on highways or more or less firm ground, and its cruising range is approximately 500 kilometers.

Now, about the remaining specifications. The developers haven't disclosed them in full, but some information is already available.

Crew and landing party


Unlike the Americans, who have already received the first prototypes of their future XM30 IFV, the Poles haven't experimented with the crew. They have a classic setup: a commander, a gunner, and a driver. However, some sources indicate that in the future, reducing the crew to two may still be possible through partial robotization of the vehicle and the use of artificial intelligence.

Regarding the troop capacity, the initial technical requirements for the vehicle included two configurations: 6 and 8. Which version the Poles will ultimately choose remains to be seen, although it's likely the vehicle with an eight-person troop compartment will be put into production. After all, the BMP-1's operational experience is still intact, even though the Borsuk is only designed for six troops.

Armament and turret


The main armament of the heavy infantry fighting vehicle is the ZSSW-30 remotely controlled module (turret), already used on the Rosomak wheeled armored personnel carriers and the Borsuk infantry fighting vehicle. The ZSSW-30 turret is a Polish development by HSW and WB Electronics, and is armed with a 30mm Mk 44/S Bushmaster II automatic cannon, configurable for 40mm, a coaxial machine gun, and a dual anti-tank missile launcher. missiles Spike‑LR.

The ZSSW-30 turret on the Medoyed has several significant advantages. Firstly, it provides weaponry commonality with the Borsuk and Rosomak turrets, simplifying logistics, crew training, and operation. Secondly, the 30/40mm cannon with modern ammunition allows the heavy IFV to effectively engage a wide range of targets – from light vehicles and fortifications to enemy infantry fighting vehicles – and the ability to increase the caliber to 40mm further expands its potential against armored vehicles and low-altitude air targets.

Thirdly, the integration of the Spike-LR anti-tank missile system gives the Honey Badger the ability to engage tanks and other heavy targets at distances of up to several kilometers, using optical-electronic guidance and a fire-and-forget mode.

Armor and mine protection


The Honey Badger's armor is apparently planned to be modular. When fully equipped, it will comply with STANAG 4569 Level 6. This means the vehicle will be able to withstand frontal fire from a 30mm automatic cannon (30x173mm) with armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) from at least 500 meters away.

The vehicle's sides will be able to withstand large, lethal fragments from large-caliber artillery shells at a distance of ten meters from the blast. Heavy machine guns such as 12,7mm and 14,5mm will also not penetrate the sides. Furthermore, the Honey Badger may be equipped with explosive reactive armor, which will provide protection against grenades such as the PG-7.

In addition, the IFV will optionally be equipped with active protection and optical-electronic countermeasure systems.


The Poles report that the Honey Badger's mine protection will be quite good. They immediately stated that it will exceed STANAG 4569 Level 4, which, in its most advanced version, already provides protection against mines and improvised explosive devices with explosive payloads up to 10 kg.

Of course, it's not as if the Honey Badger would run into such a mine and not even notice. It would definitely lose propulsion, but everyone in the crew compartments would remain alive and even more or less unharmed. This is planned to be achieved through a reinforced underbody and the use of energy-absorbing seats for the crew and troops.

Sights, communication and observation equipment


This section is perhaps the least interesting, as the Poles don't provide any meaningful information about the electronics, including sights, communications equipment, and so on. There are only stock phrases.

They claim that the Honey Badger will receive the most modern thermal imaging sights, allowing it to observe the battlefield and engage targets at any time of day and in almost any weather, excluding those days (and nights) when there is impenetrable fog, very heavy rain or snow.

The vehicle will be equipped with an automated fire control system. It will also be given all-round visibility via cameras, and communications equipment will be installed that will integrate it into a unified information space from the tactical level upwards. In other words, it will provide everything that is being touted on every page when describing new Western military equipment.

Conclusions


Overall, the Poles were, to some extent, correct in their decision to field two different classes of IFVs. After all, their Borsuk essentially replicates the design of Soviet vehicles, designed for high mobility, including the ability to swim across water obstacles. And there's not much room for improvement in protection there.

In this regard, the Honey Badger looks like a very interesting alternative—where buoyancy isn't needed, armor will play a role. It's not tank-like, of course, like something like the T-15 Armata, but it's quite decent when combined with active protection and an optical-electronic countermeasure system.

The only question is how serious the problems the Poles will face in terms of logistics, material and technical support, and organizational structure, having two IFVs that are similar in some respects, but still different.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    15 September 2026 03: 37
    As I understand it, drone defense will be tacked on later, and we'll see how it goes...
    1. -1
      15 September 2026 05: 02
      I don't understand the developers at all; they don't pay any attention to the most important modern threat. Generals always prepare for the last war; it's the generals who should be preparing specifications for engineers with MODERN requirements!
      1. -5
        15 September 2026 07: 45
        a considerable number of Soviet BMP-1s (she also received BMP-2s, but in quantities far less than a hundred units), which she used for a long time.

        nationalprojects.rf
        ADVERTISING


        However, it is quite obvious that this old stuff has no prospects either in terms of modernization and maintaining combat effectiveness at the proper level, or simply in terms of service life.

        Author, you're still going to call a "motorcycle" and a "loaf" old stuff. am laughing
      2. +2
        15 September 2026 13: 09
        Quote from Andy_nsk
        I don't understand the developers at all; they don't pay any attention to the most important modern threat.

        Apparently, development of this IFV began before the era of FPV drones. To date, an effective anti-drone solution has yet to be found. To solve the problem, changing only the technical aspects (armor, ERA, sensors, screens, turrets, APS) is not enough.
        It is necessary to change the OSHS (at a minimum, introduce collective defense vehicles against drones - mini-air defense-electronic warfare at the platoon-company level, introduce a squad-platoon of riflemen who will fight UAVs), introduce UAV operators at the platoon-company level
        It is necessary to change the tactics of use: attacking from dispersed formations, operating in small groups, using UAVs and ground-based robotic systems in attack and defense to solve a variety of tasks: visual and ELINT reconnaissance, strike functions, fire support, combating enemy UAVs, electronic warfare and laying smoke screens, relaying control signals, making passages in minefields, etc.
      3. -5
        15 September 2026 18: 53
        I don't understand the developers at all; they don't pay any attention to the most important modern threat.

        What threat are we talking about? Any country with air power and independent political will will have its air force crews quickly obliterated by air power, and any effective air force action against the LBS is out of the question...
        1. 0
          16 September 2026 02: 33
          What threat are we talking about? Any country with air power and independent political will will have its air force crews quickly obliterated by air power, and any effective air force action against the LBS is out of the question...

          Aviation is useless against FPV drones.
          1. 0
            18 September 2026 20: 23
            I would even say it’s negative if they ban the terrorizing of FPV drone operators on LBS, as is happening on SVO... In other cases, it’s prohibitive.
            1. 0
              19 September 2026 05: 15
              Finding drone operators from an airplane? How do you envision that?
  2. +8
    15 September 2026 05: 20
    The Polish military is seriously considering acquiring two types of infantry fighting vehicles. The first is the Borsuk light amphibious infantry fighting vehicle, and the second is the Ratel (Honey Badger) heavy vehicle, developed under the Ciężki Bojowy Wóz Piechoty (CBWP) program.


    An excellent solution. The first IFV will go to reconnaissance and light mechanized units, and the second to heavy units.

    We are currently in dire need of heavy infantry fighting vehicles and heavy armored personnel carriers.
    1. +2
      15 September 2026 13: 12
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      We are currently in dire need of heavy infantry fighting vehicles and heavy armored personnel carriers.

      We lacked a heavy infantry fighting vehicle/armored personnel carrier in 2022-2023, and now we need other, more comprehensive solutions. A heavy infantry fighting vehicle alone won't solve the drone problem.
      1. +2
        16 September 2026 14: 23
        We already have the BMP-3 amphibious infantry fighting vehicle, and the BMP-3M "Manul" (with a front engine compartment, a BM from the "Kurganets" and a rear ramp) may be put into production. UVZ is working on a heavy armored personnel carrier (and a heavy infantry fighting vehicle based on it); a prototype was shown two or three years ago. Drone defense is addressed by a range of measures independent of the infantry's need for highly protected armored vehicles.
        Quote: Cympak
        A heavy infantry fighting vehicle alone will not solve the drone problem.

        To begin with, such a heavy infantry fighting vehicle/tough armored personnel carrier should appear in service, then there will be one less problem.
  3. -5
    15 September 2026 08: 15
    A 40-ton heavy infantry fighting vehicle? It won't outrun an FPV drone, even with a 1000-horsepower engine.
    1. 0
      15 September 2026 13: 17
      Quote: dragon772
      Even an FPV drone with a 1000 horsepower engine won't get away.

      It doesn't matter what the engine or armor is. An FPV drone can target a vulnerable spot and attack precisely there. The simplest option is to destroy the tracks and immobilize the armored vehicle. Then you can pound it with everything you have, including artillery. In any case, once the vehicle is immobilized, the combat mission is already thwarted, and the most sensible decision for the crew in this case is to abandon the immobilized vehicle.
      1. -1
        15 September 2026 15: 25
        One thing matters: how much money can be made from kickbacks when ordering hardware that no one needs? The most expensive tanks and self-propelled guns in the world were bought from the Koreans, and now they're all sitting in warehouses. The money has been received and divided, everyone's happy. Meanwhile, Poland's national debt is already 60% of GDP and will increase by hundreds of millions of dollars in 2026 due to increased arms spending. But who cares?
      2. 0
        16 September 2026 09: 02
        There's always a difference in everything. The scenario described for an FPV drone attack has long been used in the Air Defense Forces against all armored vehicles. Therefore, the class of the armored vehicle doesn't matter.
  4. -1
    15 September 2026 15: 20
    Someone's looking to line their pockets with orders. But the Poles are short on cash.
  5. +1
    16 September 2026 09: 20
    "BMP Borsuk", the next in the line will be "BMP Bobr kurwа"...
    Seriously, AI will be added to drone detection systems, plus Bushmaster, it will be perfect, time will tell...
  6. AVP
    0
    16 September 2026 13: 43
    Total for Poland:
    1. 3 (there were 4, together with the T-72/PT-91) MBTs that are almost not unified with each other.
    2. 2 (if there are no remnants of Soviet IFVs left), IFVs that are almost not unified among themselves.
    3. 3 non-unified (except for armament) types of fighters.
    The budget is borrowed, the hole in it is growing.
    This all reminds me of the armed forces of Gulf states: we'll buy everything and everywhere because we have the money, and we won't have to fight. Everything is true, except for the money, which means the last point about "not fighting" might not work either. Germany will also have to pay Poland's reparations for WWII. As soon as the EU starts to fall apart, it will pay immediately.
    1. 0
      16 September 2026 18: 14
      Poland has a lot of arrogance and a desire for freebies. They hope that all their weapons purchases will be paid for by the EU, as a contribution to the defense of their eastern borders, or by Germany, as reparations. In some ways, they are similar to the Ukrainians, only with more arrogance.
  7. 0
    19 September 2026 00: 46
    , created using elements and technologies from the Polish self-propelled gun "Crab"

    Polish? Really? A British turret with a gun mounted on a South Korean tank chassis—is that a Polish self-propelled gun?
    However, it's all in keeping with the traditions of the Polish military industry—whether in the 20th and 30th centuries or the 21st, it's all the same: the Poles assemble "Polish" equipment from whatever they can get their hands on. Previously, they at least limited themselves to Europe; now they've even reached South Korea.

    And I still don't understand what the Poles are planning to do with their 40-ton honey badger? Remember that scene from the movie about how the Bradley was made? The one about writing "I'm not a tank" on the side of the infantry fighting vehicle? A huge 40-ton beast is barreling forward, and he's like, "Well, it's not a tank, so it can't fire more than 30mm!"

    Yes, I don't understand the concept of a heavy infantry fighting vehicle. In principle.