Korotchenko: "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"

53
Korotchenko: "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"

Russian submarine missile carriers in the oceans can ensure military stability in the world, Igor Korotchenko, a military expert and chief editor of the National Defense magazine, told Golos Rossii.

"We need to ensure that our missile carriers are located in areas where, if necessary, sea-based intercontinental ballistic missiles can be launched. Sense of patrols to ensure the invulnerability of our submarine missile carriers. Thus, we ensure strategic stability in the world and maintain the status of the Russian Federation as a nuclear power." stated Korotchenko.

Currently at the disposal of Russia 9 nuclear submarine missile submarines, which are part of the Northern and Pacific fleets.

"New submarines of the Borei class are being built with the Bulava marine solid propellant ballistic missile. Actually, the Boreas will be replaced by obsolete Pacific missile carriers fleet", the expert explained.


The combat patrol zones of strategic nuclear-powered submarines of the Russian fleet in the world's oceans will be significantly expanded, while the intensity of patrols will also increase.

According to information from the General Staff of the Russian Federation, with the admission of strategic Borei-class submarines to the Navy’s combat crews, not only will patrolling in the Arctic, Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, but also resume combat missions in areas where the USSR collapsed. did not appear. We are talking about the resumption of patrols in the southern latitudes, which will make it possible to solve the tasks of strategic nuclear deterrence not only through the North Pole, but also through the South Pole.

According to Admiral Viktor Chirkov, commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, in the next three months the state tests of the first serial strategic submarine rocket carrier of the 955 project (Borei cipher) Alexander Nevsky, the second serial boat of this project Vladimir Monomakh and the main multi-purpose submarine of the 885 project “ Severodvinsk "(code" Ash ").


The Northern Fleet ship fleet is undergoing renewal, the commander-in-chief noted, the infrastructure for the Borey-class submarine base is being built and will be put into operation in stages.

Strategic missile submarine cruisers of the Borey type (the lead ship is Yuri Dolgoruky, the serial Alexander Nevsky, Vladimir Monomakh and the improved Prince Vladimir) are intended to form the backbone of the naval component of Russia's strategic nuclear forces in the near future. The main armament of the SSBN of this type is the newest intercontinental Bulava missile (from 16 to 20 missiles for each submarine). According to the plan, before 2020, 8 "Boreev" should join the Navy.


In addition, the 7 multipurpose nuclear submarines of the 885 and 885М projects (cipher "Ash" and "Ash-M") will soon be in the fleet's combat staff, the commander-in-chief of the Navy Chirkov said. “Severodvinsk” is, in fact, completing the tests, and “Kazan” should be ready for the 2015 year.


Unlike strategic submarines that carry intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads and are a means of the so-called retaliatory strike in the event of a global war, multi-purpose Yasen-type submarines are designed to perform a wide range of tasks - from defeating stationary ground targets to fighting submarines and surface ships of all types. In service with the "Ash", including, 24 newest cruise missiles "Onyx" (export name - "Yakhont").
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    4 2013 June
    The picture where the boat soars above the surface of the sea just smiled, I did not know that the "Borei" can fly, albeit low wink
    1. +5
      4 2013 June
      Let the enemy know! Our submarines also fly! Low, no big deal. Pass the sea trials, fly to the fullest!
    2. +2
      4 2013 June
      Penultimate picture. Just like a fish, CLASS good Good luck, submariners in their hard business. smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile
    3. +1
      4 2013 June
      And is it so impressive? .................... And the article is definitely a plus ...... I am in awe of the guys who are lucky enough to go on new ships
    4. Reasonable, 2,3
      +1
      5 2013 June
      And where are the whiners?. We can’t, let us not, wading into the swamp ?.
      1. -1
        5 2013 June
        Reading is nice.
        And what are you asking for, putinoid? angry
  2. US Department of State
    +1
    4 2013 June
    The Russian submarine fleet loses a lot both in quality and quantity to the US submarine fleet. The on-board electronics of the boats is outdated even on the brand-new Boreas.
    1. +2
      4 2013 June
      But the missiles are decent. Give the deadline, we'll figure it out.
      1. US Department of State
        +1
        4 2013 June
        This is another question. The mace is generally a muddy rocket, a bunch of chips are declared. But who saw them?
        1. +1
          4 2013 June
          No, well, she began to fly and hit the target. And a bunch of chips from the US missiles can only be verified in practice. God forbid.
          1. US Department of State
            +5
            4 2013 June
            Quote: fzr1000
            No, well, she began to fly and hit the target.

            The main thing is that this "become" is not a blind acceptance of a crude rocket into service, so as not to get over the top from the top.
            Quote: fzr1000
            And a bunch of chips from the US missiles can only be verified in practice. God forbid.

            I agree that all this remains in theory.
            1. Ataman
              +2
              4 2013 June
              One of the many reasons the Americans are focusing on cruise missiles with nuclear warheads is the inability to catch up with Russia with ICBMs. The US State Department should be well aware of this.
              1. Nitup
                +1
                4 2013 June
                Quote: Ataman
                One of the many reasons the Americans are focusing on cruise missiles with nuclear warheads is the inability to catch up with Russia with ICBMs. The US State Department should be well aware of this.

                Why can't they catch us on ICBMs? And where did you get that they focused on the Kyrgyz Republic with nuclear warheads?
                1. Ataman
                  0
                  4 2013 June
                  The USA rejected all attempts by Russia to include Kyrgyzstan in the START-3 treaty. Barack Obama in a conversation with Putin said that Congress will not allow him to include the Kyrgyz Republic in the agreement. A lot has been written about the state of strategic nuclear weapons in the USA. Offhand, here is a Topvarov article (though not the best)
                  http://topwar.ru/10191-strategicheskie-yadernye-sily-ssha-traektoriya-padeniya.h
                  tml
                  1. Nitup
                    0
                    4 2013 June
                    Good. It is not clear why it is impossible for the United States to catch up with us on ICBMs, as you write, and therefore they are guided by the Kyrgyz Republic?
                    1. Ataman
                      -1
                      4 2013 June
                      Well, for example, here is a quote from articles on this topic:
                      US Secretary of Defense Gates estimates that in a few years, approximately 3 / 4 US nuclear scientists will reach retirement age and retire. But now the mess and ugliness in the US national laboratories have reached such a level that the government was forced to remove all fissile materials from the Los Alamos Laboratory - they simply plundered them and sold them to unknown people.

                      I will not cite a lot of other facts and articles, it will take up a lot of space.
                      1. Nitup
                        +1
                        4 2013 June
                        Firstly, I believe in such articles with a drud. In places like nuclear laboratories, there is always a very strict regime and control. And secondly, I still do not understand, where does the ICBM? If they have no one to make charges for ICBMs, then who will make them for the Kyrgyz Republic?
        2. 0
          4 2013 June
          They are not only shown to everyone in a row, but even offered to fly on a rocket. Join the queue first and see.
    2. +3
      4 2013 June
      well yes! you are talking about sharks about them on the slipways, it turned out to be difficult to cut, and not just to sink such a cruiser in battle, so you don’t need to la la I won’t give offense to the Russian submarine fleet even killed (not in fair battle) sharks from the goss depot of the usa and chenush under their control !! it’s a pity that it was not enough to see how these outdated ships would be driving the brand new ultramodern Amer’s hounds across the oceans!
    3. +6
      4 2013 June
      I will tell you this: with an electromagnetic pulse, which always happens after a nuclear explosion, all digital technology orders "to live long." Personally, I would prefer to install only analog equipment on all carriers and stationary strategic objects !!! In this aspect, it is not killed by an electromagnetic pulse! with it, let it become morally obsolete, but it works flawlessly. Digital equipment needs to be installed in the apartment, and not show off with it on military equipment strategic destination. We need reliability and reliability, not window dressing.
      Why do you think so far in the air defense forces on the ACS of the radar are cabinets with lamp equipment? And not blocks the size of a laptop (but digital equipment?) This is smaller in size .. Why ??? Yes, because whether the equipment of the air defense means is digital and if it falls into the zone of the electromagnetic pulse, the entire air defense will come from a star !!! Let fools put strategic numbers on strategic submarines ..
      1. kosta7491
        0
        4 2013 June
        And it’s better to cram arithmometers in the SU SAM or not scores. And the Americans .. well, they don’t know the damaging factors ya ..
        1. 0
          4 2013 June
          Apparently you are an ignorant person in this matter, and I repeat again, you need to install (and, by the way, if you don’t know) such equipment not at all what, but only in strategically important objects! By the way, when I studied at the radar control system operator in 1997, we had just such equipment. Absolutely immune to any external factors and saw the sky perfectly.
          You can continue to ulcerate and put such equipment even in your MANPADS or elsewhere, for example, in the NVD if you can compactly equip it. And I don’t give a shit about pindos, do they know about the damaging factors of nuclear weapons or not, and all the more I don’t care what filling their technology has. It is purely theirs problems and to solve them and all the more bear responsibility for everything, only for themselves.
      2. 0
        17 2013 June
        I hasten to upset you ..... the fight against EMP (in the conditions of a trained crew — a tank, a nuclear submarine, a ship, etc.,) is achieved very simply .... by elementary disconnecting all (Radio, radar, etc.) equipment from the antenna ..... (on any military electronic equipment (RPU, RPDU, radar, etc.) there is a simple toggle switch ...... click ... and EMP on the drum .... the main thing is to catch time .... .................................................. ....................
        . And EVERYTHING ......... everything else is a fairy tale from the Cold War tales series! Believe me pliz, ...... the officer (already unfortunately stock) RPK SN commander of the warhead-4 ................. wink
  3. +11
    4 2013 June
    I’ll say a hackneyed phrase. But it is more relevant than ever, Russia has only two allies, its army and navy. Thanks only to these friends, Russia was not broken in the 90s. And they were respected in the 2000s. So in this situation, the more nuclear submarines the better. And we wish our Navy more ships, good and different.
    1. Volkhov
      -15
      4 2013 June
      Actually, the army has been opposed to Russia for about 100 years, and maybe earlier:
      - a group of senior generals led by Alekseev staged the abdication of the Tsar, destroying the Empire
      - the same Alekseev organized the White Army, leading the matter to a standstill
      - The Red Army and Trotsky carried out the genocide of the population and the division of the territory
      - the top army leadership created the conditions for the defeat of 41 g and subsequent losses
      - militarism in weapons orders undermined the economy
      - the army allowed the collapse of the USSR
      - the army shot the parliament
      - the army turned the Chechen wars into the utilization of patriots
      - the army, according to the results of the Georgian war, deprived the people of the possibility of self-defense, having disbanded the cropped units and taking out mobile supplies

      Conclusion - an army without public control behaves infinitely and is the closest enemy of the Russian population.
      1. +2
        4 2013 June
        Popular control over the army and led it to the existing result. The mob reserves of the army were stolen much earlier, and no one asked permission from the army. Perhaps you are calling for a civil war? Do you think the result of a civil or Russian revolt will be prettier than what we have now?
        1. +3
          4 2013 June
          Quote: GregAzov
          Popular control over the army and led it to the existing result.

          Not in the eyebrow but in the eye. And Vasya apparently has an education of the 3rd grade of central vocational school. I mixed flies and cutlets, the Tsar, and Lenin.
        2. Volkhov
          +2
          4 2013 June
          The people were in favor of preserving the USSR, but there was a referendum - the army did not support it, but the popular attempt at restoration in 93 was successfully suppressed, although without desire - the democrats had to send commissars seconded to each platoon, without commissars there were only Moscow units - there were enough Chekists there.
          Quote: GregAzov
          The army’s mobil stocks were stolen much earlier, and no one asked the army for permission

          And why such an army, from which you can come and pick up - you yourself thought that they wrote?
      2. 0
        17 2013 June
        You are my friend, either a provocateur or (sorry) ............... incompetent (administrators didn’t miss another word) During the USSR, the Army and Navy did not need public control ..... because .... they were .....- folk!
  4. +2
    4 2013 June
    - "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"
    And only he, in contrast to various destructors.
    That's what you need, first and foremost, for the ocean fleet!
  5. US Department of State
    0
    4 2013 June
    Quote: Sirocco
    And we wish our Navy more ships, good and different.

    And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.
    1. 0
      4 2013 June
      Quote: US State Department
      And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.

      Better later than never. How's it going in the State Department? How is things going in the US Navy? They say they also began to build something. Or just walk on old galoshes?
      1. 0
        4 2013 June
        today the news about arly beks was ordered, so unfortunately with galoshes they have a pack order
    2. 0
      4 2013 June
      Somewhere faster than this: "Severodvinsk" was laid down in December 1993 and launched in June 2010. The second ship of the Yasen project ─ Kazan ─ was laid down in July 2009; its transfer to the fleet is scheduled for 2015. "
      1. +7
        4 2013 June
        If memory like you does not change me, then starting with Gorbaty, all of our heavy and light industry, and the military-industrial complex, with the help of democratizers from the west, and our corrupt hands of drivers, this entire industry was almost destroyed. And say thank you, for there were wise leaders from the military-industrial complex who kept the spark from the former flame, and now again kindle the fire of enterprises.
  6. 0
    4 2013 June
    there are moments where we lose, and there are where we win
  7. +3
    4 2013 June
    Still they would build faster. It's time for Borey and Ash to get up for battle.
  8. +1
    4 2013 June
    Quote: US State Department
    This is another question. The mace is generally a muddy rocket, a bunch of chips are declared. But who saw them?

    The chips are not in order to see, but in order to feel, some people ... smile
    1. US Department of State
      -2
      4 2013 June
      Well, God forbid. The main thing is that some of them do not feel a puddle from their chips laughing
      1. +3
        4 2013 June
        Quote: US State Department
        The main thing is that some of them do not feel a puddle from their chips

        You're right. The main thing is feelings. If only everything was as bad as you want. That the US State Department would not squeal like pigs in a slaughterhouse, in the 90s everyone and everything suited, the USA in the dashing 90s, EBN wherever they did not kiss. And here on you, everything is wrong for you. Probably you felt a "banana" with a screw at your priests? laughing
      2. +7
        4 2013 June
        The Second World War has shown that the military power of a country is determined not by how many weapons it has, but by how fast it can produce it. You always focus on high-tech weapons, and this is the most widespread misconception, because victory in a war is always determined by people The last launch of the mini-men in the United States showed what their personnel are good for, so the responsible general was fired, and the Pentagon grabbed his head. Yankees sail across the seas-oceans on boats, strategists mean , made even before Reagan. Yes, and with the production of high-tech devices is not at all rosy. The industrial base was lost so that it is difficult to reproduce what has already happened. About the new one, they generally say that there are no designers.
        1. +3
          4 2013 June
          Quote: shinobi
          for victory in a war is always determined by people, and not by itself as a weapon.

          Bull's-eye. Indeed, in the event of hostilities, a likely adversary, like us, will make attempts to disable all of these electronic devices, and then what? There are no ZhPS, there are no maps, a compass, they do not know how to use, the zoo star sneaks up unnoticed. I recall the story of the Yugoslav officer who brought down Stealth and did not lose a single soldier, so he used the wired connection and the messengers. Thanks to this, he survived.
          1. kosta7491
            -1
            4 2013 June
            And communication, target designation can still be provided with signal lights and carrier pigeons.
  9. -1
    4 2013 June
    Quote: US State Department
    And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.

    you are not yet possible. too much was lost ... yes the shipyards are not enough, the problem is that we lost our shipbuilding capacities in the south, wait and see what happens next. like after Sochi, some republics are going to disconnect ... and take up the Crimea tightly))
    1. +2
      4 2013 June
      Quote: indiggo
      some republics are going to disconnect ... and take up the Crimea tightly))

      good grass?
  10. +4
    4 2013 June
    Korotchenko: "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"

    cannot but SHOULD PROVIDE and WILL BE SUPPORTED IN THE FUTURE stability in the world
    1. Volkhov
      -2
      4 2013 June
      soon there will be 7 multipurpose nuclear submarines of projects 885 and 885M

      There are no new ones yet, but the old ones - piece by piece on the ocean - are stably empty.
      Let’s better scare the world with nuclear material storage facilities - much more terrible and real.
      1. 0
        5 2013 June
        let them get scared! let fear bring all our poison fuel to us. Russia has a technology for the disposal and storage of such waste, and most importantly, a technology for converting waste into fuel for fast neutron reactors
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%E5%E0%EA%F2%EE%F0_%ED%E0_%E1%FB%F1%F2%F0%FB%F5_
        %ED%E5%E9%F2%F0%EE%ED%E0%F5
  11. +2
    4 2013 June
    Given the development of high-precision weapons and tracking systems, nuclear submarines remain the only limiting factor ... let alone be able to kick out from under the ice of the Arctic Ocean.
    1. kosta7491
      +1
      4 2013 June
      If you have something to hide.
  12. +4
    4 2013 June
    slowly, slowly, we are restoring the fleet, it is clear that I want to quickly and for more, but everything has its time. I’m only sure of the greatness of the Russian Navy BE !!! and do not argue!
  13. vlrosch
    -6
    4 2013 June
    First, overlapping all standards, we cut new ships, and now we are building such poor ones for the sake of the Americans. These ships cannot scare anyone, much less win. Read our press: in the North, only "Admiral Kulakov" is on the move, from the lead boats only old-new ones were left somehow ...
    1. 0
      4 2013 June
      Quote: vlrosch
      These ships cannot scare anyone, much less win. Read our press: in the North, only "Admiral Kulakov" is on the move, from the lead boats only old-new ones were left somehow ...

      What exactly do you offer? Fall to your knees and surrender to the winner Hunchback has already done this for all of us.
      Now we, like that frog from the parable, are floundering, whipping sour cream from milk, but getting out. There is no other way. Yes and never will be, this other.
  14. Grigorich 1962
    0
    4 2013 June
    Let the Americans and their minions know that ALWAYS are under the gun of our weapons .....
    1. +1
      4 2013 June
      Quote: Grigorich 1962
      Let the Americans and their minions know that ALWAYS are under the gun of our weapons .....

      DUK and we are at their sight. This is the guarantee of stability.
  15. Kovrovsky
    +1
    4 2013 June
    Quote: Sirocco
    Quote: US State Department
    And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.

    Better later than never. How's it going in the State Department? How is things going in the US Navy? They say they also began to build something. Or just walk on old galoshes?

    This is our Navy, and the United States Navy.
  16. +1
    4 2013 June
    At the very beginning of the article, I amused another "pearl" of the self-named "military expert" who tried to retell the combat mission of the sea-based strategic nuclear forces and passed it off as his "expert assessment." A few quotes and "light" criticism:
    "It is necessary to ensure the location ..." So it is that now it turns out to be not provided!? So it smacks of disclosing no less than a State Secret! And to whom does he indicate "to ensure the finding"? VGK, MO, GSh, Navy? As the saying goes, the question is not about salary.
    ".. if necessary, you can start .." и "the point of patrolling is to ensure invulnerability ... It's even funny to comment on these freshman cadet-level phrases. So what's the point of patrolling? In launches or in invulnerability? And why "CAN IMPLEMENT" instead of "SHOULD BE PRODUCED"? I just want to remember the commander's "Can Masha for the thigh ..." Just rzhu-nimaga!
    Next:".. we ensure strategic stability in the world and support the status of the Russian Federation as a nuclear power .." Now these are not the words of a "boy", but at least of the President. However, its "provide" and "support" does not correlate in any way with the "It is necessary to ensure finding ..." at the very beginning of the quote. What is it? Short memory?
    Yet below the already unnamed author of the article writes: According to information from the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with the adoption of the Borye-class strategic submarines into the Navy, submarine missile carriers will not only continue to patrol the Arctic, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, but will also resume combat missions in those areas where, with the collapse of the USSR, they practically did not appear. Wow, easy! And then I already started to worry.
    So I want to slightly change the classic: "And - God forbid you - don't read Mr. Korotchenko's statements until lunchtime. Patients who don't read Mr. Korotchenko's statements feel great."

    And the rest of the article is sensible. Plus ...
  17. +1
    4 2013 June
    Quote: dimon-media
    I will tell you this: with an electromagnetic pulse, which always happens after a nuclear explosion, all digital technology orders "to live long." Personally, I would prefer to install only analog equipment on all carriers and stationary strategic objects !!! In this aspect, it is not killed by an electromagnetic pulse! with it, let it become morally obsolete, but it works flawlessly. Digital equipment needs to be installed in the apartment, and not be poked on strategic military equipment. We need reliability and reliability, not window dressing. Why do you think there are still cabinets with lamp equipment in the air defense forces on the radar control system? And not blocks the size of a laptop (but digital equipment?) It's smaller .. Why ??? Yes, because if the air defense equipment is digital and if it gets into the zone of the Electromagnetic Pulse, the whole air defense will come zvezdets !!! Let the fools put a figure on strategic submarines ..


    You messed up a lot, all semiconductor technology will fail, and it doesn’t matter if it is digital or analog.
    1. -1
      4 2013 June
      Where do I write about semiconductors? I did not write anything about semiconductors. Read carefully, I wrote about the tube technique. I won’t write anything about SKVT, especially if you don’t know what it is.
  18. 0
    4 2013 June
    while the new ones are being built, the old ones will be written off, so we will remain "with our own" in terms of quantity - nevertheless, we need a couple of dozen strategists and thirty multipurpose pieces, so that there is enough repair and duty and rest for everything. Although we are no longer the USSR and it makes no sense even to chase those numbers, as well as for syshya
  19. +1
    4 2013 June
    From the article:
    "New Borei-class submarines are being built ... Actually, Borei will replace the outdated missile carriers of the Pacific Fleet," the expert explained.
    Yes ... 25 diploma became quite difficult with the ship's crew.
    3 rpkSN pr. 667BDRM 80-ies of the construction of the last century, frankly, weak for the rapidly growing Asia-Pacific region. Pacific Fleet urgently needs to be strengthened. States are climbing into the region, China is strengthening, India, Japan are arming themselves ...
    As always. The new corps will be accepted by the Federation Council, fulfilled and transferred to the Tofs. Next, switch to Pacific Fleet with a passing BS. The main thing is that upon arrival in Krasheninnikov Bay, the infrastructure for new ships, as well as housing for crews and families of submariners, is ready. That everything was like in Vilyuchensk after Putin’s arrival, and not before.

    Quote: Rabic
    Few quotes and "light" criticism ... But the rest of the article is efficient. Plus ...

    Dear Rabik! Korotchenko gave interviews for the "general" public, so some blunders are forgivable for him, although I completely agree: you need to formulate your thought more carefully, because what you say is read by people who are competent in this matter.
  20. annenkov242
    +2
    4 2013 June
    It's strange. The title of the article ".. can provide ...",
    If it did not ensure parity, we would already be bent!
  21. +1
    4 2013 June
    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
    Dear Rabik! Korotchenko gave interviews for the "general" public, so some blunders are forgivable for him, although I completely agree: you need to formulate your thought more carefully, because what you say is read by people who are competent in this matter.

    Honorable Boa KAA! To the editor-in-chief of the National Defense magazine, moreover, a former officer of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, such bloopers are UNFORGIVING. So I don’t forgive them to him, and for whom these interviews are intended, this is the second thing.
  22. ABV
    +1
    4 2013 June
    politicians like parrots, current rating points would have won, they were already sick .... tests will begin soon, sea trials will begin soon ... will begin soon .... soon .... WHEN THE Fleet will accept and go on combat duty, that's when their mouths must be disclosed ...
  23. KENTAVROS
    0
    4 2013 June
    GOOD LUCK AND GLORY TO THE RUSSIAN NAVY, GOD SAVE GOD OF OUR SEAFARERS.
  24. luka095
    0
    5 2013 June
    The main thing is that all submarines were put into operation on time.
  25. 0
    5 2013 June
    Korotchenko: "Russian submarine fleet can ensure military stability in the world "
    In the name itself, there is already some kind of flaw. The submarine fleet "cannot" - it must ensure military stability in the world! This is his direct responsibility. One of its existence.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"