Military Review

Korochenko: "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"

53
Korochenko: "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"

Russian submarine missile carriers in the oceans can ensure military stability in the world, Igor Korotchenko, a military expert and chief editor of the National Defense magazine, told Golos Rossii.


"We need to ensure that our missile carriers are located in areas where, if necessary, sea-based intercontinental ballistic missiles can be launched. Sense of patrols to ensure the invulnerability of our submarine missile carriers. Thus, we ensure strategic stability in the world and maintain the status of the Russian Federation as a nuclear power." stated Korotchenko.

Currently at the disposal of Russia 9 nuclear submarine missile submarines, which are part of the Northern and Pacific fleets.

"New submarines of the Borei class are being built with the Bulava marine solid propellant ballistic missile. Actually, the Boreas will be replaced by obsolete Pacific missile carriers fleet", the expert explained.


The combat patrol zones of strategic nuclear-powered submarines of the Russian fleet in the world's oceans will be significantly expanded, while the intensity of patrols will also increase.

According to information from the General Staff of the Russian Federation, with the admission of strategic Borei-class submarines to the Navy’s combat crews, not only will patrolling in the Arctic, Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, but also resume combat missions in areas where the USSR collapsed. did not appear. We are talking about the resumption of patrols in the southern latitudes, which will make it possible to solve the tasks of strategic nuclear deterrence not only through the North Pole, but also through the South Pole.

According to Admiral Viktor Chirkov, commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, in the next three months the state tests of the first serial strategic submarine rocket carrier of the 955 project (Borei cipher) Alexander Nevsky, the second serial boat of this project Vladimir Monomakh and the main multi-purpose submarine of the 885 project “ Severodvinsk "(code" Ash ").


The Northern Fleet ship fleet is undergoing renewal, the commander-in-chief noted, the infrastructure for the Borey-class submarine base is being built and will be put into operation in stages.

Strategic missile submarine cruisers of the Borey type (the lead ship is Yuri Dolgoruky, the serial Alexander Nevsky, Vladimir Monomakh and the improved Prince Vladimir) are intended to form the backbone of the naval component of Russia's strategic nuclear forces in the near future. The main armament of the SSBN of this type is the newest intercontinental Bulava missile (from 16 to 20 missiles for each submarine). According to the plan, before 2020, 8 "Boreev" should join the Navy.


In addition, the 7 multipurpose nuclear submarines of the 885 and 885М projects (cipher "Ash" and "Ash-M") will soon be in the fleet's combat staff, the commander-in-chief of the Navy Chirkov said. “Severodvinsk” is, in fact, completing the tests, and “Kazan” should be ready for the 2015 year.


Unlike strategic submarines that carry intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads and are a means of the so-called retaliatory strike in the event of a global war, multi-purpose Yasen-type submarines are designed to perform a wide range of tasks - from defeating stationary ground targets to fighting submarines and surface ships of all types. In service with the "Ash", including, 24 newest cruise missiles "Onyx" (export name - "Yakhont").
Originator:
http://rus.ruvr.ru/
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. altman
    altman 4 June 2013 15: 29 New
    +3
    The picture where the boat hovers above the surface of the sea just smiled, did not know that the Boreas can fly, albeit low wink
    1. Yazov
      Yazov 4 June 2013 15: 42 New
      +5
      Let the enemy know! Our submarines also fly! Low, no big deal. Pass the sea trials, fly to the fullest!
    2. Army1
      Army1 4 June 2013 17: 46 New
      +2
      Penultimate picture. Just like a fish, CLASS good Good luck, submariners in their hard business. smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile
    3. FREGATENKAPITAN
      FREGATENKAPITAN 4 June 2013 20: 04 New
      +1
      And is it so impressive? .................... And the article is definitely a plus ...... I am in awe of the guys who are lucky enough to go on new ships
    4. Reasonable, 2,3
      Reasonable, 2,3 5 June 2013 01: 24 New
      +1
      And where are the whiners?. We can’t, let us not, wading into the swamp ?.
      1. little man
        little man 5 June 2013 10: 39 New
        -1
        Reading is nice.
        And what are you asking for, putinoid? angry
  2. US Department of State
    US Department of State 4 June 2013 15: 38 New
    +1
    The Russian submarine fleet loses a lot both in quality and quantity to the US submarine fleet. The on-board electronics of the boats is outdated even on the brand-new Boreas.
    1. fzr1000
      fzr1000 4 June 2013 15: 45 New
      +2
      But the missiles are decent. Give the deadline, we'll figure it out.
      1. US Department of State
        US Department of State 4 June 2013 15: 48 New
        +1
        This is another question. The mace is generally a muddy rocket, a bunch of chips are declared. But who saw them?
        1. fzr1000
          fzr1000 4 June 2013 15: 53 New
          +1
          No, well, she began to fly and hit the target. And a bunch of chips from the US missiles can only be verified in practice. God forbid.
          1. US Department of State
            US Department of State 4 June 2013 15: 58 New
            +5
            Quote: fzr1000
            No, well, she began to fly and hit the target.

            The main thing is that this “become” is not a blind adoption of a crude missile into service, so as not to get a top cap.
            Quote: fzr1000
            And a bunch of chips from the US missiles can only be verified in practice. God forbid.

            I agree that all this remains in theory.
            1. Ataman
              Ataman 4 June 2013 16: 47 New
              +2
              One of the many reasons Americans are targeting cruise missiles with nuclear warheads is the inability to catch Russia on ICBMs. The US State Department should be well aware of this.
              1. Nitup
                Nitup 4 June 2013 17: 48 New
                +1
                Quote: Ataman
                One of the many reasons Americans are targeting cruise missiles with nuclear warheads is the inability to catch Russia on ICBMs. The US State Department should be well aware of this.

                Why can't they catch us on ICBMs? And where did you get that they focused on the Kyrgyz Republic with nuclear warheads?
                1. Ataman
                  Ataman 4 June 2013 18: 06 New
                  0
                  The USA rejected all attempts by Russia to include Kyrgyzstan in the START-3 treaty. Barack Obama in a conversation with Putin said that Congress will not allow him to include the Kyrgyz Republic in the agreement. A lot has been written about the state of strategic nuclear weapons in the USA. Offhand, here is a Topvarov article (though not the best)
                  http://topwar.ru/10191-strategicheskie-yadernye-sily-ssha-traektoriya-padeniya.h
                  tml
                  1. Nitup
                    Nitup 4 June 2013 18: 23 New
                    0
                    Good. It is not clear why it is impossible for the United States to catch up with us on ICBMs, as you write, and therefore they are guided by the Kyrgyz Republic?
                    1. Ataman
                      Ataman 4 June 2013 21: 21 New
                      -1
                      Well, for example, here is a quote from articles on this topic:
                      US Secretary of Defense Gates estimates that in a few years, approximately 3 / 4 US nuclear scientists will reach retirement age and retire. But now the mess and ugliness in the US national laboratories have reached such a level that the government was forced to remove all fissile materials from the Los Alamos Laboratory - they simply plundered them and sold them to unknown people.

                      I will not cite a lot of other facts and articles, it will take up a lot of space.
                      1. Nitup
                        Nitup 4 June 2013 22: 18 New
                        +1
                        Firstly, I believe in such articles with a drud. In places like nuclear laboratories, there is always a very strict regime and control. And secondly, I still do not understand, where does the ICBM? If they have no one to make charges for ICBMs, then who will make them for the Kyrgyz Republic?
        2. Gregazov
          Gregazov 4 June 2013 17: 11 New
          0
          They are not only shown to everyone in a row, but even offered to fly on a rocket. Join the queue first and see.
    2. regsSSSR
      regsSSSR 4 June 2013 16: 29 New
      +3
      well yes! you are talking about sharks about them on the slipways, it turned out to be difficult to cut, and not just to sink such a cruiser in battle, so you don’t need to la la I won’t give offense to the Russian submarine fleet even killed (not in fair battle) sharks from the goss depot of the usa and chenush under their control !! it’s a pity that it was not enough to see how these outdated ships would be driving the brand new ultramodern Amer’s hounds across the oceans!
    3. dimon-media
      dimon-media 4 June 2013 17: 31 New
      +6
      I will tell you this: with an electromagnetic pulse, which always happens after a nuclear explosion, all digital technology orders "to live long." Personally, I would prefer to put only analog equipment on all carriers and stationary strategic objects !!! In this aspect, she is not killed by an electromagnetic pulse! with her, though morally obsolete, but works flawlessly. It is necessary to put digital equipment in the apartment, and not to hang it on military equipment strategic destination. We need reliability and reliability, not window dressing.
      Why do you think so far in the air defense forces on the ACS of the radar are cabinets with lamp equipment? And not blocks the size of a laptop (but digital equipment?) This is smaller in size .. Why ??? Yes, because whether the equipment of the air defense means is digital and if it falls into the zone of the electromagnetic pulse, the entire air defense will come from a star !!! Let fools put strategic numbers on strategic submarines ..
      1. kosta7491
        kosta7491 4 June 2013 20: 08 New
        0
        And it’s better to cram arithmometers in the SU SAM or not scores. And the Americans .. well, they don’t know the damaging factors ya ..
        1. dimon-media
          dimon-media 4 June 2013 21: 18 New
          0
          Apparently you are an ignorant person in this matter, and I repeat again, you need to install (and, by the way, if you don’t know) such equipment not at all what, but only in strategically important objects! By the way, when I studied at the radar control system operator in 1997, we had just such equipment. Absolutely immune to any external factors and saw the sky perfectly.
          You can continue to ulcerate and put such equipment even in your MANPADS or elsewhere, for example, in the NVD if you can compactly equip it. And I don’t give a shit about pindos, do they know about the damaging factors of nuclear weapons or not, and all the more I don’t care what filling their technology has. It is purely theirs problems and to solve them and all the more bear responsibility for everything, only for themselves.
      2. FREGATENKAPITAN
        FREGATENKAPITAN 17 June 2013 02: 10 New
        0
        I hasten to upset you ..... the fight against EMP (in the conditions of a trained crew — a tank, a nuclear submarine, a ship, etc.,) is achieved very simply .... by elementary disconnecting all (Radio, radar, etc.) equipment from the antenna ..... (on any military electronic equipment (RPU, RPDU, radar, etc.) there is a simple toggle switch ...... click ... and EMP on the drum .... the main thing is to catch time .... .................................................. ....................
        . And EVERYTHING ......... everything else is a fairy tale from the Cold War tales series! Believe me pliz, ...... the officer (already unfortunately stock) RPK SN commander of the warhead-4 ................. wink
  3. Sirocco
    Sirocco 4 June 2013 15: 40 New
    11
    I’ll say a hackneyed phrase. But it is more relevant than ever, Russia has only two allies, its army and navy. Thanks only to these friends, Russia was not broken in the 90s. And they were respected in the 2000s. So in this situation, the more nuclear submarines the better. And we wish our Navy more ships, good and different.
    1. Volkhov
      Volkhov 4 June 2013 16: 35 New
      -15
      Actually, the army has been opposed to Russia for about 100 years, and maybe earlier:
      - a group of senior generals led by Alekseev staged the abdication of the Tsar, destroying the Empire
      - the same Alekseev organized the White Army, leading the matter to a standstill
      - The Red Army and Trotsky carried out the genocide of the population and the division of the territory
      - the top army leadership created the conditions for the defeat of 41 g and subsequent losses
      - militarism in weapons orders undermined the economy
      - the army allowed the collapse of the USSR
      - the army shot the parliament
      - the army turned the Chechen wars into the utilization of patriots
      - the army, according to the results of the Georgian war, deprived the people of the possibility of self-defense, having disbanded the cropped units and taking out mobile supplies

      Conclusion - an army without public control behaves infinitely and is the closest enemy of the Russian population.
      1. Gregazov
        Gregazov 4 June 2013 17: 17 New
        +2
        Popular control over the army and led it to the existing result. The mob reserves of the army were stolen much earlier, and no one asked permission from the army. Perhaps you are calling for a civil war? Do you think the result of a civil or Russian revolt will be prettier than what we have now?
        1. Sirocco
          Sirocco 4 June 2013 17: 22 New
          +3
          Quote: GregAzov
          Popular control over the army and led it to the existing result.

          Not in the eyebrow but in the eye. And Vasya apparently has an education of the 3rd grade of central vocational school. I mixed flies and cutlets, the Tsar, and Lenin.
        2. Volkhov
          Volkhov 4 June 2013 20: 04 New
          +2
          The people were in favor of preserving the USSR, but there was a referendum - the army did not support it, but the popular attempt at restoration in 93 was successfully suppressed, although without desire - the democrats had to send commissars seconded to each platoon, without commissars there were only Moscow units - there were enough Chekists there.
          Quote: GregAzov
          The army’s mobil stocks were stolen much earlier, and no one asked the army for permission

          And why such an army, from which you can come and pick up - you yourself thought that they wrote?
      2. FREGATENKAPITAN
        FREGATENKAPITAN 17 June 2013 02: 15 New
        0
        You are my friend, either a provocateur or (sorry) ............... incompetent (administrators didn’t miss another word) During the USSR, the Army and Navy did not need public control ..... because .... they were .....- folk!
  4. knn54
    knn54 4 June 2013 15: 40 New
    +2
    - "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"
    And only he, in contrast to various destructors.
    That's what you need, first and foremost, for the ocean fleet!
  5. US Department of State
    US Department of State 4 June 2013 15: 42 New
    0
    Quote: Sirocco
    And we wish our Navy more ships, good and different.

    And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 4 June 2013 16: 01 New
      0
      Quote: US Department of State
      And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.

      Better later than never. How's it going in the State Department? How is things going in the US Navy? They say they also began to build something. Or just walk on old galoshes?
      1. vadson
        vadson 4 June 2013 17: 07 New
        0
        today the news about arly beks was ordered, so unfortunately with galoshes they have a pack order
    2. sub307
      sub307 4 June 2013 16: 10 New
      0
      Somewhere sooner than this: Severodvinsk was laid in December 1993 and launched in June 2010. The second ship of the project "Ash" ─ "Kazan" ─ was laid in July 2009; its transfer to the fleet is scheduled for 2015. "
      1. Sirocco
        Sirocco 4 June 2013 16: 20 New
        +7
        If memory like you does not change me, then starting with Gorbaty, all of our heavy and light industry, and the military-industrial complex, with the help of democratizers from the west, and our corrupt hands of drivers, this entire industry was almost destroyed. And say thank you, for there were wise leaders from the military-industrial complex who kept the spark from the former flame, and now again kindle the fire of enterprises.
  6. indiggo
    indiggo 4 June 2013 15: 44 New
    0
    there are moments where we lose, and there are where we win
  7. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 4 June 2013 15: 52 New
    +3
    Still they would build faster. It’s time already and “Boream” and “Ash” to get up on the battlefield.
  8. Russ69
    Russ69 4 June 2013 15: 56 New
    +1
    Quote: US Department of State
    This is another question. The mace is generally a muddy rocket, a bunch of chips are declared. But who saw them?

    The chips are not in order to see, but in order to feel, some people ... smile
    1. US Department of State
      US Department of State 4 June 2013 16: 01 New
      -2
      Well, God forbid. The main thing is that some of them do not feel a puddle from their chips laughing
      1. Sirocco
        Sirocco 4 June 2013 16: 14 New
        +3
        Quote: US Department of State
        The main thing is that some of them do not feel a puddle from their chips

        You're right. The main thing is feelings. If only it were as bad as you want. That the US State Department would not squeal like pigs in a slaughter, in the 90s everyone was happy with everything, the United States in the dashing 90s, they did not kiss the EBN. And here on you, everything is wrong for you. Probably felt in their priests "banana" with a screw? laughing
      2. shinobi
        shinobi 4 June 2013 16: 38 New
        +7
        The Second World War showed that the country's military power is determined not only by how many weapons it has, but how fast it can produce them. You always focus on high-tech weapons, and this is the most common misconception, because people always determine victory in a war and not the weapon itself as such. The last launch of the mini-launch in the United States showed that their staff was suitable, so that the responsible general was fired, and the pentagon grabbed his head. , to do more to Reygana.Da and the production of high-tech devices are not raduzhno.Prom base poherili so hard to reproduce what is already bylo.A new general say that "No constructors".
        1. Sirocco
          Sirocco 4 June 2013 17: 29 New
          +3
          Quote: shinobi
          for victory in a war is always determined by people, and not by itself as a weapon.

          Bull's-eye. Indeed, in the event of hostilities, a likely adversary, like us, will make attempts to disable all of these electronic devices, and then what? There are no ZhPS, there are no maps, a compass, they do not know how to use, the zoo star sneaks up unnoticed. I recall the story of the Yugoslav officer who brought down Stealth and did not lose a single soldier, so he used the wired connection and the messengers. Thanks to this, he survived.
          1. kosta7491
            kosta7491 4 June 2013 20: 21 New
            -1
            And communication, target designation can still be provided with signal lights and carrier pigeons.
  9. indiggo
    indiggo 4 June 2013 16: 00 New
    -1
    Quote: US Department of State
    And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.

    you are not yet possible. too much was lost ... yes the shipyards are not enough, the problem is that we lost our shipbuilding capacities in the south, wait and see what happens next. like after Sochi, some republics are going to disconnect ... and take up the Crimea tightly))
    1. vadson
      vadson 4 June 2013 17: 11 New
      +2
      Quote: indiggo
      some republics are going to disconnect ... and take up the Crimea tightly))

      good grass?
  10. regsSSSR
    regsSSSR 4 June 2013 16: 11 New
    +4
    Korochenko: "The Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world"

    cannot but SHOULD PROVIDE and WILL BE SUPPORTED IN THE FUTURE stability in the world
    1. Volkhov
      Volkhov 4 June 2013 16: 43 New
      -2
      soon there will be 7 multipurpose nuclear submarines of projects 885 and 885M

      There are no new ones yet, but the old ones - piece by piece on the ocean - are stably empty.
      Let’s better scare the world with nuclear material storage facilities - much more terrible and real.
      1. karbofos
        karbofos 5 June 2013 04: 56 New
        0
        let them get scared! let fear bring all our poison fuel to us. Russia has a technology for the disposal and storage of such waste, and most importantly, a technology for converting waste into fuel for fast neutron reactors
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%E5%E0%EA%F2%EE%F0_%ED%E0_%E1%FB%F1%F2%F0%FB%F5_
        %ED%E5%E9%F2%F0%EE%ED%E0%F5
  11. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 4 June 2013 16: 17 New
    +2
    Given the development of high-precision weapons and tracking systems, nuclear submarines remain the only limiting factor ... let alone be able to kick out from under the ice of the Arctic Ocean.
    1. kosta7491
      kosta7491 4 June 2013 20: 23 New
      +1
      If you have something to hide.
  12. Check
    Check 4 June 2013 16: 18 New
    +4
    slowly, slowly, we are restoring the fleet, it is clear that I want to quickly and for more, but everything has its time. I’m only sure of the greatness of the Russian Navy BE !!! and do not argue!
  13. vlrosch
    vlrosch 4 June 2013 16: 29 New
    -6
    First, cutting off all standards, we cut new ships, and now we are building such wretched ones to please the Americans. These ships can not scare anyone, let alone win. Read our press: in the North only "Admiral Kulakov" on the move, of old boats left only old junk somehow ...
    1. Garrin
      Garrin 4 June 2013 17: 59 New
      0
      Quote: vlrosch
      These ships can not scare anyone, let alone win. Read our press: in the North only "Admiral Kulakov" on the move, of old boats left only old junk somehow ...

      What exactly do you offer? Fall to your knees and surrender to the winner Hunchback has already done this for all of us.
      Now we, like that frog from the parable, are floundering, whipping sour cream from milk, but getting out. There is no other way. Yes and never will be, this other.
  14. Grigorich 1962
    Grigorich 1962 4 June 2013 16: 51 New
    0
    Let the Americans and their minions know that ALWAYS are under the gun of our weapons .....
    1. Manager
      Manager 4 June 2013 17: 11 New
      +1
      Quote: Grigorich 1962
      Let the Americans and their minions know that ALWAYS are under the gun of our weapons .....

      DUK and we are at their sight. This is the guarantee of stability.
  15. Kovrovsky
    Kovrovsky 4 June 2013 16: 58 New
    +1
    Quote: Sirocco
    Quote: US Department of State
    And to be handed over on time. And not late in 3-4 years.

    Better later than never. How's it going in the State Department? How is things going in the US Navy? They say they also began to build something. Or just walk on old galoshes?

    This is our Navy, and the United States Navy.
  16. Rabic
    Rabic 4 June 2013 18: 12 New
    +1
    At the very beginning of the article, another “pearl” of a self-named “military expert” amused himself, who tried to retell the combat mission of a sea-based strategic nuclear forces and gave it as his “expert assessment”. A few quotes and "light" criticism:
    "It is necessary to ensure the finding ..." So what is it, now it turns out to be not secured!? So it smacks of disclosure of as much as State Secret! And to whom does he indicate "ensure location"? VGK, MO, GSH, Navy? As they say the question is not on salary.
    ".. if necessary, start-up can be carried out .." и "the meaning of patrolling is to ensure invulnerability ... These phrases of the first-year cadet level are even ridiculous to comment on. So what's the point of patrolling? In launches or still in invulnerability? And why "CAN BE IMPLEMENTED" instead of "MUST PRODUCE"? And I want to remember the commander’s "You can Masha for the thigh ..." Just laugh-nimaga!
    Next:"..we provide strategic stability in the world and maintain the status of the Russian Federation as a nuclear power .." These are not the words of the “boy”, but at least the President. However, it “provides” and “supports” does not correlate with “It is necessary to ensure the presence of ...” at the very beginning of the quote. What is it? Short memory?
    Yet below the already unnamed author of the article writes: According to information from the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with the adoption of the Borye-class strategic submarines into the Navy, submarine missile carriers will not only continue to patrol the Arctic, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, but will also resume combat missions in those areas where, with the collapse of the USSR, they practically did not appear. Wow, easy! And then I already started to worry.
    So I want to slightly change the classic: "And - God bless you - don’t read Mr. Korotchenko’s remarks until dinner. Patients who don’t read Mr. Korotchenko’s remarks feel great."

    And the rest of the article is sensible. Plus ...
  17. ddmm09
    ddmm09 4 June 2013 18: 26 New
    +1
    Quote: dimon-media
    I will tell you this: with an electromagnetic pulse, which always happens after a nuclear explosion, all digital technology orders "to live long." Personally, I would prefer to put only analog equipment on all carriers and stationary strategic objects !!! In this aspect, she is not killed by an electromagnetic pulse! with her, though morally obsolete, but works flawlessly. It is necessary to put digital equipment in the apartment, and not talk about it on strategic military equipment. We need reliability and reliability, not window dressing. Why do you think so far in the air defense forces on the ACS of the radar are cabinets with lamp equipment? And not blocks the size of a laptop (but digital equipment?) This is smaller in size .. Why ??? Yes, because whether the equipment of the air defense means is digital and if it falls into the zone of the electromagnetic pulse, the entire air defense will come from a star !!! Let fools put strategic numbers on strategic submarines ..


    You messed up a lot, all semiconductor technology will fail, and it doesn’t matter if it is digital or analog.
    1. dimon-media
      dimon-media 4 June 2013 21: 24 New
      -1
      Where do I write about semiconductors? I did not write anything about semiconductors. Read carefully, I wrote about the tube technique. I won’t write anything about SKVT, especially if you don’t know what it is.
  18. bddrus
    bddrus 4 June 2013 18: 53 New
    0
    while the new ones are being built - the old ones will be written off, so that we will remain “at home” in terms of quantity — nevertheless, we need a couple of dozen strategists and thirty multipurpose ones, so that there is enough repair and duty and rest. Although we are no longer the USSR and it makes no sense to even chase those numbers, as well as for syshya
  19. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 4 June 2013 19: 10 New
    +1
    From the article:
    "New submarines of the Borey class are being built ... Actually, the Boreas will replace the obsolete missile carriers of the Pacific Fleet," the expert explained.
    Yes ... 25 diploma became quite difficult with the ship's crew.
    3 rpkSN pr. 667BDRM 80-ies of the construction of the last century, frankly, weak for the rapidly growing Asia-Pacific region. Pacific Fleet urgently needs to be strengthened. States are climbing into the region, China is strengthening, India, Japan are arming themselves ...
    As always. The new corps will be accepted by the Federation Council, fulfilled and transferred to the Tofs. Next, switch to Pacific Fleet with a passing BS. The main thing is that upon arrival in Krasheninnikov Bay, the infrastructure for new ships, as well as housing for crews and families of submariners, is ready. That everything was like in Vilyuchensk after Putin’s arrival, and not before.

    Quote: Rabic
    A few quotes and "easy" criticism ... But the rest of the article is sensible. Plus ...

    Dear Rabik! Korotchenko gave an interview to the “wide" public, so he was forgiven for some mistakes, although I completely agree: you need to more carefully formulate the idea, because what you say can be read by people competent in this matter.
  20. annenkov242
    annenkov242 4 June 2013 19: 34 New
    +2
    It’s strange. The title of the article ".. can provide ...",
    If it did not ensure parity, we would already be bent!
  21. Rabic
    Rabic 4 June 2013 20: 10 New
    +1
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Dear Rabik! Korotchenko gave an interview to the “wide" public, so he was forgiven for some mistakes, although I completely agree: you need to more carefully formulate the idea, because what you say can be read by people competent in this matter.

    Honorable Boa KAA! The editor-in-chief of the National Defense magazine, moreover, the former officer of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, such blunders are unforgivable. So I don’t forgive them, and for whom these interviews are intended, this is the second thing.
  22. ABV
    ABV 4 June 2013 21: 07 New
    +1
    politicians like parrots, current rating points would have won, they were already sick .... tests will begin soon, sea trials will begin soon ... will begin soon .... soon .... WHEN THE Fleet will accept and go on combat duty, that's when their mouths must be disclosed ...
  23. KENTAVROS
    KENTAVROS 4 June 2013 23: 13 New
    0
    GOOD LUCK AND GLORY TO THE RUSSIAN NAVY, GOD SAVE GOD OF OUR SEAFARERS.
  24. luka095
    luka095 5 June 2013 01: 09 New
    0
    The main thing is that all submarines were put into operation on time.
  25. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 5 June 2013 09: 19 New
    0
    Korotchenko: "Russian submarine fleet can provide military stability in the world "
    The name itself already has some kind of flaw. The submarine fleet “cannot” - it must ensure military stability in the world! This is his direct responsibility. One of its existence.