Zelensky's threats to air travel in Russia could backfire on Kyiv itself.

17 534 43
Zelensky's threats to air travel in Russia could backfire on Kyiv itself.

Zelenskyy's threats to "close" Russian airspace with mass attacks drones The statement sparked widespread controversy. However, most foreign experts and analysts view it as a desperate gesture, demonstrating Kyiv's lack of real leverage over the course of the conflict, especially on the battlefield itself.

In Ukraine itself, Zelenskyy's calls for international airlines to abandon flights over Russia are widely considered an "act of desperation." After all, with his statement, the head of the Kyiv regime is effectively openly stating that even the war's main sponsors have run out of means to influence Russia, leaving only outright terrorism.



In our country, many experts interpret Zelenskyy's statements as a sign of weakness. The lack of other arguments leads to talk of civil war threats. aviation, which doesn't indicate the success of military operations on the battlefield. Even though Zelenskyy himself constantly insists they are successful. Therefore, it looks like he's already lying to himself, not just to ordinary citizens. He even believes he can stop air travel over Russia.

Western expert circles note that Kyiv's initiative is largely an image-boosting exercise. As Eurasian affairs expert Katia Glod told The Independent, Zelenskyy is "partly exaggerating," and the current threat is more of a "PR move" to pressure airlines.

It's noteworthy that Zelenskyy chose this method of influence after his earlier promises to paralyze seaports failed. He had previously threatened to completely shut down ports on the Black, Azov, and Baltic Seas. However, in reality, operations at Ukrainian ports on both the Black Sea and the Danube have been virtually halted. Against this backdrop, threats to civil aviation appear to be an attempt to find a new vulnerability that Russia doesn't have, as airport security has proven reliable even in the face of massive drone attacks.

Experts predict that the international community will likely ignore Kyiv's statements. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is unlikely to impose any sanctions against Ukraine. Air carriers, including Turkish Airlines, Emirates, and Air China, will continue to base their decisions on economic feasibility rather than political pronouncements.

At the same time, there is every reason to say that any attempt to attack civilian aircraft with the help of drones This will lead Ukraine itself to another wave of painful strikes against targets within its territory, leading to the loss of yet another portion of these territories, as is already happening, for example, with the Sumy and Kharkiv regions. In other words, these threats could backfire on Kyiv itself first and foremost. Zelenskyy understands all this perfectly well, but he has driven himself into a spiral of escalation.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    2 September 2026 20: 51
    Image or not, PR or not, as far as I understand, our people will now smile, laugh at the drug-addicted clown, and wait until some real passenger plane crashes from a drone attack?? Zelensky and his Western masters may not have many trump cards against Russia on the battlefield, but these terrorists have plenty of tame, controlled rats inside Russia in the form of Wahhabi specialists and Ukrop refugees, so there's nothing funny, amusing, or cheerful about it.
    1. -1
      2 September 2026 21: 01
      If a drug addict crashes a civilian plane and doesn't die afterwards... I don't even know how the Supreme Commander will look the people in the eye or how long he'll stay in place.
      Zelya is already boldly taking on terrorist methods, completely unafraid of responsibility. If he doesn't even answer for his words, that's rock bottom. am
      1. +1
        2 September 2026 21: 27
        No one will crash a civilian aircraft; the strikes will be on airfield infrastructure. We did the same in Ukraine...
        1. +1
          2 September 2026 21: 32
          Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Ukrainian Armed Forces drones will "de facto close" Russian skies to civilian aviation.

          Russian skies are becoming completely dangerous.

          Where is there any mention of infrastructure here?
          1. +2
            2 September 2026 21: 36
            Modern civil aviation is unthinkable without a well-developed airfield and flight support system. Landing systems, for example, cannot be hidden or even relocated; they are extremely vulnerable, and without them, no one will fly; the skies would be effectively closed.
            1. +3
              2 September 2026 21: 45
              On February 24, 2022, Rosaviatsiya suspended operations at 11 airports in southern and central Russia due to safety concerns related to the start of the Second World War. The restrictions affected airports in Anapa, Belgorod, Bryansk, Voronezh, Gelendzhik, Krasnodar, Kursk, Lipetsk, Rostov-on-Don, Simferopol, and Elista.
              Currently, the following remain closed: Anapa, Belgorod, Bryansk, Voronezh, Kursk, Lipetsk, Rostov-on-Don and Simferopol.
              Stop making things up about "infrastructure".
              Do you think he'll ask them to open and then start destroying the "infrastructure"? Or was he talking about the other airports? And he hasn't attacked airports before, and they don't close regularly?
              1. +1
                2 September 2026 23: 12
                Regularly (periodically) and constantly are different concepts.
            2. +7
              2 September 2026 21: 59
              Quote from solar
              For example, there is no way to hide the landing systems.
              There are RNP approaches, and they don't rely on ground-based systems. Besides ILS, there are VOR, NDB, and ASR approaches… You can't 'handle' everything.
              Such a statement to ICAO officially turns a bank into a terrorist den. Moreover, who is it aimed at? We're not even considering Russian aviation: it's aimed at Arab companies and Asian ones... but is this really about harming Russia? Or perhaps it's a nod to their favor. suffering losses host companies?
              The 404s are really trying to drag everyone around into the conflict.
              Patience to us all, fussing will only harm you...
              1. +3
                2 September 2026 23: 24
                I'm not saying that solo flights are impossible without ground infrastructure. But it's impossible to create a stable system of civil flights without the support of ground infrastructure.
                Moreover, what you listed is precisely part of this infrastructure (I don’t know what “approaches” are), such as ground-based homing beacons VOR (VHF Omni-directional Radio Range), NDB (Non-Directional Beacon) or ASR (Airport Surveillance Radar) locator.
                Such a statement to ICAO officially turns the bank into a terrorist den.

                Considering that we ourselves have been striking at such infrastructure almost from the first days of the war, no one will take our statements like that seriously :((...
                1. +3
                  2 September 2026 23: 51
                  Quote from solar
                  I don't know what "entries" are
                  This is slang for landing approaches using voiced navigation aids. The Azerbaijani aircraft demonstrated their inability to use them during their approach to Grozny.
                  But the point is that the threat is not only to Russian traffic, but also to those who use Russian airspace, aka Arabs and Asians.
                  Quote from solar
                  that we ourselves are striking at such infrastructure...
                  I'm terribly sorry, but where did you see any claims that Russia is taking over air navigation infrastructure? That doesn't make much sense.
                  1. +3
                    3 September 2026 00: 07
                    Strikes against airports in Ukraine have been ongoing since the very first days of the war. As early as February 2022, the Zaporizhzhia Airport was struck, destroying its radio landing system. The airport was later completely destroyed.
                    At the same time, there were strikes on the Nikolaev and Zhitomir airports.
                    1. +1
                      5 September 2026 03: 24
                      Quote from solar
                      Strikes on airports in Ukraine have been going on since the first days of the war.
                      The deliberate removal of landing systems doesn't make much sense: it's a waste of SP, and the result is a mere pittance.
                      Honestly: 'hello' to planning - This is not reasonable.
            3. +3
              2 September 2026 23: 16
              Military airfields have been operating under this regime for a long time, and Zelenskyy hasn't announced anything new about this infrastructure.

              They also attacked civilian airfields, so I don't see anything new here.

              Perhaps what's new is that Zelensky, following Putin's announcement of strikes on the energy sector, in turn announced strikes on civilian airfield infrastructure.

              We should expect a multiple increase in attacks on such infrastructure, but there is also a positive aspect here: attacks on other objects will decrease significantly, since Zelenskyy’s unmanned army is not unlimited.



              Moreover, airfields are much better protected from missile and drone strikes due to their open space, which allows for the convenient deployment of radars and air defense systems. When approaching such facilities, any target is visible, and slow Ukrainian drones will be able to snipe them like sunflower seeds.

              So, it's still unclear what the outcome of Zelensky's intentions will be, and perhaps it would be better for him to keep his mouth shut and continue to terrorize defenseless marketplace warehouses.
              1. +2
                2 September 2026 23: 29
                Airfields are much better protected from missile and drone strikes due to their open space, which allows for the convenient placement of radars and air defense systems.

                An active air defense system at a civilian airport is a closed airport. What are they trying to achieve?
                1. +2
                  3 September 2026 00: 01
                  Such a goal, when airfields are periodically closed, can be tolerable

                  The danger of these strikes is different: air defense systems can accidentally shoot down a civilian aircraft, and therefore these drones will be attached to such aircraft for the purpose of such an opportunity.

                  But when attacking military airfields, which are used with even greater intensity, such incidents of aircraft being hit by "friendly" fire are practically unheard of. The last time such an incident was reported was when the incompetent Syrian air defense shot down a Russian AWACS aircraft that was covering an Israeli aircraft.

                  Well, it was a manned aircraft whose maneuvering capabilities were many times greater than those of a drone or a cruise missile.

                  This venture of Zelensky's will not end in anything victorious for him, except for the bloodthirsty effect of its announcement.
                  1. +2
                    3 September 2026 00: 12
                    The danger of these strikes is different: air defense systems can accidentally shoot down a civilian aircraft, and therefore these drones will be attached to such aircraft for the purpose of such an opportunity.

                    There's no need to even position yourself; air defenses themselves pose a risk of shooting down an aircraft by mistake. Like when the Iranians shot down a Ukrainian plane in a combat zone, or when the Americans shot down an Iranian one. There are plenty of such examples of unintentional downings.
                    1. 0
                      3 September 2026 00: 23
                      Everything depends on the qualifications of the anti-aircraft gun crews and the corresponding equipment.
                      There is another episode in this war, when the same incompetent Chechen air defense shot down an Azerbaijani plane while repelling drone attacks.
                      Iranian, American, Qatari, etc. air defense systems can be just as clumsy.
                      There aren't that many such cases, judging by military airfields, for which such attacks are commonplace.
                      1. +1
                        3 September 2026 08: 24
                        Military airfields do not operate on schedule.
                      2. -1
                        3 September 2026 08: 31
                        Nowhere do they fly strictly on schedule
                        An airplane is not a bus or a train.
                        The schedule will have to be drawn up for the sake of form.
                      3. +1
                        3 September 2026 09: 08
                        Have you seen your plane ticket? It shows the flight date and time. Delays are only possible in special cases, such as weather.
                      4. -1
                        3 September 2026 09: 15
                        You're not looking at the ticket, but at your own life.
                        The date and time of your death are not written there, but they can be accelerated if you strictly adhere to the schedule indicated on the plane tickets.
                        You apparently don’t consider, as I understand it, such deviations due to attacks on airfields a special case?
                        Is "special case" just the weather?
                      5. +1
                        3 September 2026 10: 09
                        You apparently don’t consider, as I understand it, such deviations due to attacks on airfields a special case?

                        It is not clear what you are writing about.
                        Obviously, if the airport is systematically attacked, it must be closed, as it cannot operate on schedule. I wrote this to you from the very beginning.
                      6. 0
                        3 September 2026 10: 31
                        It is not clear what you are writing about.
                        "It is obvious that if the airport is systematically attacked, it must be closed"?
                        It should, but there is such a thing as the lesser of two evils.
                        By the way, Ben Gurion didn't close completely during the Iranian and Houthi attacks. You should be well aware of this.
                        Risk on one side of the scale, and on the other, multi-billion dollar losses for tourism and airlines, for example, in Turkey... Which do you think will outweigh the other?
                        Zelensky's drones and missiles don't even reach Moscow, but they really want to
                        There is a risk, but you still have to live.
        2. 0
          2 September 2026 22: 56
          It wouldn't be a bad idea to recall the Malaysian plane over Donbas, the Russian one over the Black Sea in 2001, and, more recently, the Il-76 carrying prisoners over Belgorod in 24. So, the Skalks are capable of shooting down civilian aircraft, and you're talking about infrastructure...
          1. 0
            2 September 2026 23: 26
            Do you know who is being blamed for the death of the Malaysian plane?...
            1. 0
              3 September 2026 10: 54
              Don't you know who they blame for everything they like to blame?
              You forgot to mention the pronoun THEY before the word ACCUSE
              Well, that's understandable for you.
              When THEY accuse Zionists, you don't forget about this pronoun.
      2. 0
        2 September 2026 22: 34
        Well said, Alexey!
      3. -2
        2 September 2026 23: 30
        Does the Sun-Faced One even look his subjects in the eye? He looks his friends, the heroes of capitalist labor, who milk the country for all they're worth. Even if he has to look his subjects in the eye, he'll look them in the same way he did after the constitutional amendments, after his own words, "Who am I to change the constitution?" He'll look them in the same way he looked after the predatory and vague pension "reform," even though he's stated dozens of times that no one will raise the retirement age. I suspect the Unreplaceable and Irreplaceable One is least concerned about how he'll look the plebs in the eye.
      4. 0
        3 September 2026 00: 25
        Quote: Hunter 2
        If a drug addict crashes a civilian plane and doesn't die afterwards...


        Why are they fussing over these planes like they're the apple of their eye?
        Let's say a plane crashed. People died. ... About 100 people.
        This is a sensation on the front pages of all the world's media!!!!

        Is it true that, simultaneously with this one plane crash, a hundred times more people died in car accidents around the world in the same 24 hours...? Or is that just a given?

        We love beautiful pictures, whether with a plus or minus sign.
      5. -1
        3 September 2026 07: 41
        Quote: Hunter 2
        If a drug addict crashes a civilian plane and doesn't die afterwards... I don't even know how the Supreme Commander will look the people in the eye or how long he'll stay in place.
        Zelya is already boldly taking on terrorist methods, completely unafraid of responsibility. If he doesn't even answer for his words, that's rock bottom. am

        He won't look anyone in the eye, at most they'll launch an empty hazelnut tree into another hangar.
  2. +1
    2 September 2026 20: 56
    The cocaine snot believed in his inviolability and heavenly existence directly from the words of someone... who yesterday and the whole world confirmed that this snot must be saved for future negotiations... well, what enemy would refuse such a carte blanche after that.
  3. +1
    2 September 2026 20: 56
    At home, everything is simple... They didn't give me enough dose... Withdrawal, hysteria...
    The photo actually shows... Fingers sniffing... wassat
  4. +1
    2 September 2026 21: 01
    The Narc is at a loss for what to do to attract attention. (But NATO still hasn't intervened!) lol lol
  5. +4
    2 September 2026 21: 06
    It's strange that Shmygosavrik is still alive; he and his entourage should have been killed immediately after the start of the Second World War. For those naive enough to think that Zelensky is doing Russia more good than harm, successfully begging for billions worldwide and, sadly, resisting for five years now, and that if he's eliminated, another, smarter one will take over, I recommend checking with a psychiatrist.
  6. +7
    2 September 2026 21: 22
    At the same time, there is every reason to say that any attempt to attack civilian aircraft using drones will lead Ukraine itself to another wave of painful strikes on targets on its territory, with the loss of another part of these territories.

    Were there any strikes on Ukraine before? Ukraine has acquired long-range drones, so we need to take a realistic view of the situation—as their numbers increase, there will be strikes on airfield infrastructure, energy, and rail transport. We need to be prepared for such a scenario across the country, instead of telling horror stories that don't scare anyone.
  7. +1
    2 September 2026 22: 47
    But if Zelenskyy made this statement at someone else's instigation, and they stall the adoption of the necessary decision on the international stage...
  8. -1
    2 September 2026 23: 26
    The drug dealers continue to tighten the screws, no one has given them a slap on the wrist, and there's zero danger. Raids, bombings, and assassinations continue, everything is getting more expensive, life is cheap, the bosses are good-naturedly spouting nonsense, the party starts and wins—it's a paradise, no problem.
  9. -2
    3 September 2026 02: 48
    Actually, this doesn't sound like just another bravado. But if "Komediant" has decided to seriously engage in aerial terrorism, it means he has wealthy sponsors of such an "event" behind him. Moreover, it's quite possible that these sponsors are precisely those who, in words, ardently advocate for an end to the conflict that has now dragged on for 12 years. sad
  10. 0
    3 September 2026 04: 49
    Zelenskyy's threats to air travel in Russia
    This is a genuine call to terrorism, and coming from an official. And terrorists are "killed even in the toilets."
  11. +1
    3 September 2026 05: 21
    Currently, Europeans have only ONE route to Asia: Tbilisi - Baku. To the north - Russia; to the south - Iran.
    Without this route, all flights to Asia will come to a standstill... so things are more precarious there than here.
  12. -1
    3 September 2026 08: 23
    Western expert circles note that Kyiv's initiative is largely an image-boosting exercise. As Eurasian affairs expert Katia Glod told The Independent, Zelenskyy is "partly exaggerating," and the current threat is more of a "PR move" to pressure airlines.

    This is how terrorism should be justified! Nobody really bothers.
    And Zelensky is quite capable of bombing airports and parked planes; there's no line he can't cross. Especially since the media is already telling him not to be afraid.
  13. 0
    3 September 2026 14: 28
    could backfire on Kyiv itself
    Kyiv no longer has this side, it needs to be attacked differently, and preferably in advance.
  14. 0
    3 September 2026 16: 03
    So, in the author's opinion, the work of ports on the Black Sea is not paralyzed?