A robot with automatic weapons. New NRTK for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

5 376 21
A robot with automatic weapons. New NRTK for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.


Ukraine unveiled another ground-based combat robotic system. It's built on a four-wheeled platform and features an unusual combat module with two automatic weapons. The developers hope that the affordable weapon This will reduce costs and allow for faster deployment of such systems. However, the chosen solution has obvious limitations.



At the test stage


The Ukrainian Defense Ministry and the Brave1 defense innovation cluster announced the new development on August 27. They showed the robot's appearance and disclosed some details about the project. The name of the system and the developer have not yet been released.

According to the Ukrainian side, an unnamed company participating in Brave1 received grant funding and went from concept to a completed prototype in less than six months. The project was developed according to the cluster's technical specifications.

The project's main result was a specialized turret with mounts for two Kalashnikov assault rifles. It was installed on a new four-wheeled platform. Furthermore, the possibility of mounting such a module on other wheeled and tracked NRTK systems was stated.

The turret is currently undergoing operational testing in more than five Ukrainian units. The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense also reports the successful use of this technology by the SBU Special Operations Center "A" against ambushes using dronesThe published materials confirm the fact of this statement, but do not allow for an independent assessment of the circumstances and outcome of the incident.

Current testing could determine the future of the NRTK. If the results are positive, the developer could expect to receive an order, but details on procurement and serial production plans have not yet been published.

Technical features


The new combat NRTK is a four-wheeled self-propelled platform with a remote-controlled small arms module. It is generally similar to other products in its class, but differs in the chassis layout and armament.


Published images show the vehicle has no single hull. The rectangular bow and stern casings are connected by a central platform. The arrangement of these parts suggests a movable joint around the longitudinal axis, but the design of the joint has not been officially disclosed.

The Ukrainian agency claims a protected hull, resistant to bullets and shrapnel. However, the protection class, estimated threats, and precise armor scheme are not disclosed. The system's dimensions and weight are also unknown, and available photographs do not allow for a reliable assessment of these parameters.

The powertrain type and transmission arrangement are not disclosed. The placement of batteries, motors, and wheel drives cannot be determined reliably from appearance. Speed, range, and off-road performance specifications have also not been released.

The robot is equipped with large-diameter wheels with airless tires. Each tire consists of an outer ring with a tread and an inner elastic structure. This design is resistant to common punctures, which should increase the durability of the chassis. Data on the cost, service life, and repairability of these tires is lacking, so it is not yet possible to compare their cost effectiveness with other solutions.

A camera used for surveillance and targeting is visible on the combat module. The composition of the remaining surveillance, communication, and remote control systems is unknown. The purpose of the rectangular feature on the aft casing is also unknown.

The central platform carries a swivel bearing and an oscillating section housing two Kalashnikov assault rifles. The weapon's model and caliber have not been officially announced. The rifles are aimed synchronously, but it is unclear from published data whether they can fire separately or only simultaneously.

Due to the lack of precise weapon identification, the AK-74's table specifications cannot be applied to the entire system. Furthermore, the effective range of the assault rifle itself is not equal to the effective firing range of the robotic platform. The latter depends on the optics, stabilization, mounting rigidity, drive quality, control lag, and dispersion—these parameters have not yet been disclosed.


In a specific guise


At the general concept level, the new Ukrainian NRTK is in line with current development trends for similar equipment. It is designed to conduct surveillance, navigate rough terrain, and fire small arms without the direct presence of a soldier. The turret's modularity allows it to be mounted on various ground platforms.

However, the actual capabilities of the system remain unknown. The stated protection applies to the hull, while the module's weapons, optics, and drives remain external. Without published test results, its resistance to shelling, shrapnel, contamination, and mechanical stress cannot be assessed.

The biggest questions arise regarding armament. Brave1 explains the choice of assault rifles by their widespread use in Ukrainian units and the ability to quickly scale up the use of the NRTK. The Ukrainian Defense Ministry also claims to have reduced production costs. This logic is understandable if the system is considered a cheap and mass-produced fire support weapon. However, weapon availability alone does not determine the combat effectiveness of the entire system.

In the published footage, a person manually changes the magazine and cocks one of the assault rifles. If the turret is indeed equipped with AK-74s with standard 30-round magazines, the total ammunition load is 60 rounds. With continuous simultaneous firing at the rated rate of approximately 600 rounds per minute per barrel, the ammunition load is theoretically exhausted in approximately three seconds. In combat, the assault rifles will likely fire in short bursts, but the need for manual handling still limits the robot's autonomy.

A belt-fed machine gun could increase the firepower, but would require a more robust module, increased ammunition capacity, and a stable platform. Without data on payload capacity, drives, and acceptable recoil, it's impossible to say whether such a weapon is suitable for this NRTK, nor whether its installation is impossible.

Thus, the developers proposed a clear compromise: a widely deployed weapon should reduce costs and speed up deployment of the system, but it will limit the unmanned operational time. The final assessment depends on the results of tests of accuracy, stabilization, communications, security, and reliability. Until this information is published, claims of success or failure of the new NRTK remain premature.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    3 September 2026 04: 25
    So, the idea isn't bad: "an inexpensive, remote-controlled robot instead of a human." But wheels won't go everywhere. And what will the cart do when it falls over? Walking, running, and flying robots look much more promising.
    1. +5
      3 September 2026 05: 47
      So the idea is not bad:
      When the ammo runs out (and it runs out quickly), will this cart blow itself up or go into captivity?!!
      1. +3
        3 September 2026 08: 33
        When the ammo runs out (and it runs out quickly), will this cart blow itself up or go into captivity?!!

        I think she'll go back to get it recharged.
    2. +3
      3 September 2026 08: 32
      And what will the cart do when it falls on its side? Walking, running, and flying robots look much more promising.

      Why would a cart fall over? An explosion nearby? Well, someone would have to shoot at it. Walkers are an order of magnitude more expensive. They're clearly counting on mass numbers. Imagine a hundred of those carts attacking two... four fighters. You wouldn't envy them!
      1. +3
        3 September 2026 15: 14
        The plantings, where most, if not all, of the BD is currently taking place, are full of fallen trees and other debris. What will this cyber-carriage of ancient proto-Ukrainians, descended from the heavens, be doing there? Is it trained to fight?
        Imagine a hundred of these carts attacking two...four fighters. You wouldn't envy them!
        A common swinehund's wet dream. Drone drops will multiply it by zero—that's if THIS gets anywhere.
        1. +1
          4 September 2026 02: 06
          Most of the outskirts are steppe, but even if there are obstacles, they can be avoided. They'll certainly get stuck in the forest. As for UAVs, it's essential to train ground robots to attack aerial targets as well.
  2. +2
    3 September 2026 05: 53
    It would be better to attach a Kalashnikov to a drone...cheap and cheerful.
    He sat in ambush, fired, and flew to another place.
    1. +2
      3 September 2026 20: 56
      Our guys have already tried something like this, but it's not going into production. We haven't heard anything about them on the LBS.
      The one in the first photo is more promising - a micro-assault rifle with an AK, it fired and flew home to reload.
  3. BAI
    +2
    3 September 2026 08: 34
    At one time we found ourselves in the role of catching up with UAVs, now we are lagging behind in the area of ​​ground equipment.
    How many soldiers' lives will have to pay for this?
    Will our generals start again - are these useless toys?
    1. +1
      3 September 2026 08: 52
      Quote: BAI
      At one time we found ourselves in the role of catching up with UAVs, now we are lagging behind in the area of ​​ground equipment.
      How many soldiers' lives will have to pay for this?
      Will our generals start again - are these useless toys?

      The generals have nothing to do with it; they should only set the task and the technical specifications, but the Minister of Defense is the one making the decision... Whose job is it? Do we have many robotics developers? Do we have any specialists? I know one company that developed engineering equipment for the army; I even attended an interview there once... The head of the HR department, a retired military man, immediately rejected me because I'd never worked with technical requirements and GOSTs for Defense Ministry design. Now that engineering weapons plant has gone out of business, even though there's a monument to Karbyshev nearby. It's just a garbage dump, and they rent out the space.
      1. BAI
        +6
        3 September 2026 08: 59
        Generals have a lot to do with it. Whether or not equipment goes to the troops depends on them.
        I immediately gave an example with UAVs.
        Who makes the decision to accept for supply?
        But the retired factory worker is right: no model that doesn't meet GOST standards will be sent to the military. It would be a waste of time and money (it might, but only if there's a political directive from the country's civilian leadership).
        The Ukrainians don't give a damn about GOSTs. That's why they're implementing new standards faster than we are. And that's another hello to the generals who cling to the old rules and refuse to change anything.
  4. +3
    3 September 2026 08: 45
    Apparently, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are short of machine guns. A remote-controlled turret would immediately increase the cost of the design, but a 60-round ammo pack won't last long in combat.
    The combat value of this ground-based robotic complex is unclear.
    A transport mule doesn't really need a turret with automatic weapons, and the firepower and ammo are not enough for fire support in combat.
    1. +1
      3 September 2026 13: 34
      Well, let's start with the fact that there are magazines that hold more than 30 rounds—the AK has 45 and 60, and I think larger-capacity ones can be made, and they're relatively inexpensive. Choosing a machine gun (even two) is quite logical if you're looking for a low cost. This thing is mostly disposable, so the cheaper the better.
      As for those machine gun things... the Ukrainian Armed Forces have had them for a long time, even since 12.7... about a year ago there was a video of an encounter between our MTLB and their drone... I don't know how it really ended, but in the video the drone fired the entire belt from the M2 at point-blank range and the vehicle didn't move for the couple of minutes the video was running.
  5. -1
    3 September 2026 09: 15
    First radio-controlled, then fiber-optic, then with an integrated AI module and terrain awareness, fully autonomous. Terminator 1, 2, 3... in 2027?
  6. +6
    3 September 2026 09: 26
    What a hodgepodge. How do they provide 360-degree visibility and control over the surrounding area? A camera so low in the grass makes the robot useless. Not to mention the difficulty with aiming and firing.
  7. +1
    3 September 2026 09: 30
    Ground robots will remain a dud on the battlefield for a long time to come, but we still need to work on this topic
    Such ground robots are protected from enemy attacks on the LBS even less than armored vehicles with crews
    For now, they can't see much and lack mobility.
  8. +2
    3 September 2026 10: 55
    Quote: APASUS
    What a hodgepodge. How do they provide 360-degree visibility and control over the surrounding area? A camera so low in the grass makes the robot useless. Not to mention the difficulty with aiming and firing.

    Here is the chassis-trolley from the Kharkov Tractor Plant (T-16), the rear axle lock increases cross-country ability, the increased track width allows movement on slopes, good visibility, the average load capacity is 800 kg.

    Seriously speaking, the benefit of such "tachankas" would be in the sheer number of them, like a crowd of drunken villagers advancing in a broad front, firing AKs from the hip...
  9. +1
    3 September 2026 15: 28
    The NRTK would probably be best equipped with a belt-fed automatic grenade launcher, with a longer belt to provide more ammunition for autonomy. Let 20 of these mobile automatic grenade launchers advance ahead of the infantry, and adjust their fire from a drone so that each remote operator of such an automatic grenade launcher has a live drone feed of where the grenades are landing. The trajectory is steep, but perfect for an automatic grenade launcher; it can hit even behind cover. First, fire a few single shots to practice, then a burst of fire at the infantry.
    1. +1
      3 September 2026 16: 29
      Quote from gribanow.c
      It’s probably best to install an automatic grenade launcher with a belt feed on the NRTK.

      Only an AGS with its recoil requires a stable platform with sufficient tare weight. The wheeled contraption presented here is unsuitable for this. A tracked chassis is required.
      A belt-fed 5,45/5,56mm machine gun would be a good fit for the platform presented. However, the wheeled platform limits its combat use to flat terrain: roads and populated areas. It won't be able to pass through forest belts, and even in a field, it will sway so much while moving, making aiming impossible.
  10. +1
    3 September 2026 19: 48
    Without a stabilizer in two planes, it’s not a good idea, you won’t get anywhere, but the problem with the on-board computer is easy to solve.
  11. 0
    4 September 2026 19: 09
    This is absolutely the right technology. Why don't we have something like this? A pair of these robots requires as much enemy resources to destroy as a single fighter and is capable of replacing up to a platoon of live soldiers in a personal combat unit.
    .
    The main thing is that management needs to get rid of Hollywood stereotypes about the designs and capabilities of combat robots and set realistic goals for the industry. I can help.
    .
    In mass production, their cost will not exceed a million, and anything over that is just wasted money.