Manturov: There is a list of companies that are candidates for external management

Security shortcomings have been identified at a number of critical facilities. These facilities may soon be placed under temporary external management.

This statement was made by the First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Denis Manturov in interview to the TASS agency on the sidelines of the Eastern Economic Forum (VEF-2026).

He reported that a list of companies candidate for external management already exists. The government will consider this option specifically for these facilities. The First Deputy Prime Minister noted that their management had previously been alerted to shortcomings in their security arrangements.

Manturov said:

There are companies that have already been repeatedly warned of shortcomings in their work to ensure safety and restore damaged facilities.

A journalist asked the official what specific security measures would be implemented at facilities under external management. He replied that they would be developed on a case-by-case basis through closed discussions.

Manturov added:

I would like to point out that we have already accumulated extensive experience in terms of means and methods for protecting objects, including passive ones. We have recommendations and catalogues of relevant Russian products approved by competent authorities, which are communicated to enterprises.

Previously, the Ministry of Industry and Trade, in collaboration with business representatives, compiled a list of critical trade and logistics infrastructure facilities. The list included 167 sites.

Comments

[Hunter 2]

that in each specific case they will be formed on the basis of closed discussions

Hero of Russia, recipient of the Order of Alexander Nevsky, and much more (except for Mother Heroine), Manturov modestly remained silent about who will participate in these "closed discussions" and who will make the decisions...

[YOU]

Actually, it's high time to figure out who acquired what property and how. If this owner isn't of any use to Russia, only whining about market prices, then it's worth looking at the price at which it was acquired.

[reaper]

It's high time to figure out who acquired what property and how

Should we redistribute the property between the new owners anew? Will it be fair this time?

[All names are taken]

Unfortunately, "the results of privatization cannot be revised."

[Kuzmitsky]

Someone great once said: what's there to think about - just take everything and divide it.

[RMT]

Someone great? Sharikov's "Heart of a Dog"
"Let me know what you have to say about what you read." Sharikov shrugged.
- Yes, I do not agree.
- With whom? With Engels or with Kautsky?
“With both,” answered Sharikov.
- What could you offer on your part?
- But what is there to offer? .. And then they write, write ... Congress, some Germans ... My head swells. Take everything and share...
“That’s what I thought,” exclaimed Philip Philipovich, slapping his palm on the tablecloth, “that’s exactly what I thought.”
"Do you know the method?" asked Bormental, interested.
“There’s no such thing as a method,” Sharikov explained, becoming talkative after the vodka. “It’s not a complicated matter.”

[Dedok]

What's there to think about? Just take everything and divide it.

Are you talking about one of the characters from "Heart of a Dog"?

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: YOU

If Rossi

What is Rossi? You are not Russian? Not a citizen of Russia? A Ukro-Banderite?

[YOU]

You know, I was wrong. As for the Banderite, I wish I'd challenged him to a duel. But live your life, you litterbug and a nasty thing to Russians. I hope you're right. You're our democrat.

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: YOU

You know, I was wrong. As for the Banderite, I wish I'd challenged him to a duel. But live your life, you litterbug and a nasty thing to Russians. I hope you're right. You're our democrat.

If I made a mistake, I apologize. Democracy comes from the Greek demos, meaning people, and kratos, meaning power. https://chersonesos.peaceregards.com/oath/

[Piramidon]

Quote: 30 vis

Quote: YOU

If Rossi

What is Rossi? You are not Russian? Not a citizen of Russia? A Ukro-Banderite?

Anyone can make typos. Why immediately label them and insult them?

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: 30 vis

Quote: YOU

If Rossi

What is Rossi? You are not Russian? Not a citizen of Russia? A Ukro-Banderite?

Anyone can make typos. Why immediately label them and insult them?

I often come across this Russian... It's like it's fashionable to call it that... As a rule, it's from people who aren't from Russia.

[ser-pov]

Actually, it's high time to figure out who acquired what property and how. If this owner isn't of any use to Russia, only whining about market prices, then it's worth looking at the price at which it was acquired.

Wherever you poke, you'll hit everything... Norilsk Nickel (Potanin is Suslov's nephew)... etc.

[vitaliy20091959]

Do you see much benefit from Manturov?

[SSR]

Quote: YOU

In fact, if we think about it, it’s high time to figure out who acquired what property and how.

Just not hoarsely (censored).

[Soldatov V.]

What's there to discuss? Even a fool can understand all the oil companies and refineries. Electricity and fuel are the lifeblood of the country; without them, everything would collapse.

[Leontrotsky]

The decisions will be made by those who are supposed to))) An excellent step towards the further nationalization of critically important facilities for the state.

[Careful]

There will be no nationalization. The assets will be transferred to other billionaires or "their own."

[alexbor]

The objects will be transferred to other billionaires or "their own."

which is the same thing

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: Hunter 2

Hero of Russia, Knight of the Order of Alexander Nevsky and many others (except Mother Heroine) - Manturov, modestly remained silent - who will participate in these “closed discussions” and who will make decisions...

These gentlemen, with their silence and maneuvering, with hints of business seizure, soon the stick of popular anger will reachwill be overheated, up to and including complete replacement, all comers, thus governing the country solely in their own selfish interests...

[Vadim S]

Nothing will happen, our people are real weaklings, as offensive as it may sound! Cowards and weaklings. Everyone's only brave in our chats, but if you mention something like, "Oh, I have a mortgage, a loan, children, personal belongings," and so on, everyone will sit there and whine even under the blows of a whip!

[spectr]

The people have nothing to do with it. It's been written repeatedly that our big business is divided into two camps: one for continuing the SVO, the other for ending it on Europe's terms. And whoever has the power now will oppress the others, taking their businesses away.

[faridg7]

This is the leg, who needs the leg

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Hunter 2

Manturov modestly remained silent about who would participate in these "closed discussions" and who would make the decisions...

I'm interested in another question: Who should ensure security? The state, or each person's own?

[RUSICH]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Who should ensure security? The state, or each person's own?

What do you think? Share your opinion and get an answer to your question. Answer or criticism.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Rusich

What do you think? Share your opinion and get an answer to your question.

I'm wondering: why did people create the state? Why do people need it? Probably so that it, the state, can do what one person can't. For example, one person can't provide their children with an education. So the state gets a Ministry of Education. One person can't protect themselves from criminals, so the state gets a Ministry of Internal Affairs. One person can't protect themselves from an external aggressor, so the state gets an Army. And so on. But if the state shifts the burden of protecting itself or its property onto the citizen, then the question arises: why do we employ countless civil servants if the state and its civil servants aren't fulfilling their functions?

[RUSICH]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

I'm wondering - why did people create a state?

You're right. But if the company is private (sole proprietorship, LLC, OJSC, JSC, whatever), then shouldn't the state also provide protective structures, for example? After all, these companies are essentially working for themselves.
I don't know the answer.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Rusich

After all, these very same offices, by and large, work for themselves.

If all these individual entrepreneurs, LLCs, OJSCs, etc. exist (work) in the state, then the state needs them.
1. They are citizens of the state and the state is obliged to protect them, both as citizens and as their property.
2. They pay taxes to the state

[RUSICH]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Quote: Rusich

After all, these very same offices, by and large, work for themselves.

If all these individual entrepreneurs, LLCs, OJSCs, etc. exist (work) in the state, then the state needs them.
1. They are citizens of the state and the state is obliged to protect them, both as citizens and as their property.
2. They pay taxes to the state

Should the state also protect Deripaska's property, for example?
Vagit Alekperov, founder and main shareholder of LUKOIL, with a fortune of $29,5 billion, is unable to protect his assets?
We donate money to sick children from the whole world and are still supposed to protect their wealth?

[Lionnvrsk]

Quote: Rusich

Should the state also protect Deripaska's property, for example?

And your property?
Buy yourself a Pantsir and a Ka-52 (or rather, pay for them and hand them over to the Ministry of Defense) and let them guard your property. If you don't buy them, your property will be taken and given to someone else. That's roughly how that hoarse beast Manturov is now reasoning on behalf of the state. And he's already got all of Gelendzhik under his thumb, like Matviyenko did Kislovodsk. The state has become accustomed to the people using their own money to outfit the army, provide it with drones, cars, motorcycles, radios, shelters (etc., etc.), and everything else the state didn't provide, and now considers it practically mandatory. But at the same time, if you calculate how much the state has allowed deputies of reindeer herders, judges, cops, and other swindlers to hoard, it's probably enough for two air defense systems to protect the country.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Rusich

Vagit Alekperov, founder and main shareholder of LUKOIL, with a fortune of $29,5 billion, is unable to protect his assets?

It's not a matter of whether he can or can't. It's a matter of principle. If someone steals 29,5 billion from Alekperov, who should investigate the crime and return the stolen property? The state, its investigative bodies. Or he himself?
And who should punish the exposed thief, the state or Alikperov?

[RUSICH]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

It's not a matter of whether he can or can't. It's a matter of principle. If someone steals 29,5 billion from Alekperov, who should investigate the crime and return the stolen property? The state, its investigative bodies. Or he himself?
And who should punish the exposed thief, the state or Alikperov?

It all seems right. But! Should the state be responsible for installing a store's security alarm, door locks, window bars, fire extinguishers, etc.? If you've provided your premises with all the necessary security measures, but they haven't helped, then a government representative shows up. And not even to improve security and safety measures.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Rusich

But! Should the state supply the store owner with security alarms, door locks, window bars, fire extinguishers, etc.?

Your reasoning is correct. But you're forgetting one nuance. All these bars, locks, and other security alarms are against, let's say, an internal enemy. But drones, shells, mines, missiles, and so on are external enemies. And against external enemies, as we've already said, the state has an army. Not the owner of stores, factories, newspapers, or ships, but the state alone.

[RUSICH]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Quote: Rusich

But! Should the state supply the store owner with security alarms, door locks, window bars, fire extinguishers, etc.?

Your reasoning is correct. But you're forgetting one nuance. All these bars, locks, and other security alarms are against, let's say, an internal enemy. But drones, shells, mines, missiles, and so on are external enemies. And against external enemies, as we've already said, the state has an army. Not the owner of stores, factories, newspapers, or ships, but the state alone.

You also reason correctly and your position is clear.
My thought can be conveyed by a popular proverb: "Trust in God, but don't be lazy yourself."
Or as one Western theologian said on this matter: “You should not ask God for more than you can do yourself.”
A dozen of our businessmen can create an army comparable to the Russian Armed Forces.
Their own greed requires protection from the state.
Are you proposing to station military units around oil refineries and large enterprises?
I understand your position. I don't condemn it or criticize it, but our views diverge somewhat, so I see no point in arguing further.
All the best!

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Rusich

A dozen of our businessmen can create an army comparable to the Russian Armed Forces.

I really hope that the authorities will not allow this.
Because this falls under the definition of illegal armed groups.

[zloybond]

Are today's managers ineffective???? As Brezhnev's daughter said, they don't even have the brains to paint what he built. They'll only be able to lay their hands on the property and ruin it. They've been building the Kukuruznik for a quarter of a century.

[moreman78]

There is a list of enterprises that are candidates for the introduction of external management

And if we take it literally, then the children/grandchildren/nephews have grown up, and they need to be given the steer, so to speak, “to be fed”!

[Klim95]

It's high time. As soon as a global crisis hits, these companies immediately receive government benefits, and protecting the state's interests is easier on their pockets.

[dnestr74]

Banks, for example, mainly...

[Klim95]

It's not just banks—it includes a list of hundreds of strategically important enterprises, including mobile operators, the raw materials industry, processing, metallurgy, and so on.

[Nikita Che]

Are there people who believe that these enterprises will be safe after the corporate raid? There's no doubt that after the so-called external management scheme, the number of dollar billionaires will increase.

[Klim95]

It's immediately obvious you're not from Russia. Anyone who lives in Russia saw, not long ago, huge lines at gas stations and high prices in stores. It's your choice. Then why are you shouting so loudly from your benches in your courtyards or in the comments that the government isn't protecting you?

[senima56]

What Mr. Manturov says and promises can be safely divided by 10 and the remainder forgotten!
Nothing he ever promised has been fulfilled! It's amazing why he hasn't been dismissed or sent to Chukotka yet!

[Vadim S]

For example, 30 passenger planes a year from 20 to 35, and so armadas of airliners swirled in our skies! 😂

[tralflot1832]

Manturov's father, who started his career as a fish-bin director on a trawler, quickly realized it wasn't for him and became a Komsomol organizer for the fleet, then a regional Komsomol committee member, then a diplomatic one, and lo and behold, he became a billionaire and a trawlerman.

[Careful]

Characteristic dynasties in the "new" Russia.

[Gomunkul]

Manturova ge tron

It reminded me of a very popular TV series:

(From the party characterization of a member of the NSDAP with
1934 SS-Brigadeführer Walter Schellenberg:
"A true Aryan. Character - Nordic, courageous,
Solid. Open with friends and colleagues at work,
Sociable, friendly. Merciless towards the enemies of the Reich.
A great family man. His wife's candidacy has been approved.
Reichsführer SS. He had no connections that could discredit him.
A great athlete. He proved himself in his work.
an outstanding organizer...")

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: Gomunkul

...The wife's candidacy has been approved.
Reichsführer SS ...

Do you think there was a personal casting???

[Gomunkul]

Do you think there was a personal casting???

I fully admit this, given the information that is publicly available on the Internet.

[Gvardeetz77]

What if the external managers fail and the facilities are littered with aircraft debris? Who will then be in control? The external managers, or the visiting Varangians?

[Million]

So, can we buy air defense systems for the enterprise and recruit a battalion of riflemen?

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: Million

So, can we buy air defense systems for the enterprise and recruit a battalion of riflemen?

Can ... but for the time being... and if like Prigozhin, it will be jump above the bar, then the plane will fall down... and "tools" с stash will be taken away and renamed (from Wagner в Afrika Korps) So, yes, it is possible. But in moderation, and with the utmost consent (it sometimes reaches forms of obvious connivance).

but only at the beginning of the journey (!) ...

[Jcvai]

There is already a list of companies that are candidates for the introduction of external management

It seems to me that this list appeared long before the bill.

[TU160]

I'm talking about something else: take Sechin, for example. Why doesn't President Putin loudly say to him: "Igor Ivanovich, you're our statesman! Aren't you ashamed to receive such a salary of 5 billion rubles a year? 15 million a day!?"
With that money, you should be covering all your ROSNEFT refineries with a protective net against Ukrainian drones. Buying Pantsir missiles for every refinery. Are you, my dear comrade, doing the work of 10,000 people alone?

[Chernorechye]

They decided to quietly take over successful businesses. It's business as usual, nothing new. They don't want to work themselves, but they want to take away their familiar, working business. And what's the fault of these businesses if the state can't protect them from Ukrainian drones and missiles? So, each plant should protect itself, and the state will simply collect taxes? Then why have such a state? Farmers have already started being fined for field fires caused by downed drones. I wonder what the government will come up with next.

[a vacuum cleaner]

"Chernorechye" You're wrong. The owner is responsible for installing protective structures. (You can also fence (protect) your house, and you'll do it yourself and with your own money—what does the state have to do with it?)

[a vacuum cleaner]

The thing is, many property owners live there, and investing in protection isn't profitable for them, because their income will decline. They won't be able to "live in luxury" there, and will have to curb their appetites and return home to their MOTHERLAND. And we only have one MOTHERLAND: RUSSIA.

[Chernorechye]

Quote: Hunter 2

that in each specific case they will be formed on the basis of closed discussions

Hero of Russia, recipient of the Order of Alexander Nevsky, and much more (except for Mother Heroine), Manturov modestly remained silent about who will participate in these "closed discussions" and who will make the decisions...

Who? "Respectable" people who just can't get enough.

[Chernorechye]

Quote: vacuum cleaner

"Chernorechye" You're wrong. The owner is responsible for installing protective structures. (You can also fence (protect) your house, and you'll do it yourself and with your own money—what does the state have to do with it?)

I wonder how an owner can protect hundreds of thousands of square meters of warehouse space, for example, from heavy drones or missiles? Doesn't the state guarantee inviolability and protection from external and internal threats? In short, this hellish circus has had enough of everyone except the so-called elite, who got fat as hell during the war, while the people are being asked to tighten their belts and unite. We have a very good capitalism in our country: they get the money, and we get patriotism. And the state has nothing to do with it; it has nothing to do with anything in our country.

[a vacuum cleaner]

It's up to the owner to decide what's more important to them. They'll build protective structures there. Or do you want them to fence their property at our expense?

[Chernorechye]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Quote: Hunter 2

Manturov modestly remained silent about who would participate in these "closed discussions" and who would make the decisions...

I'm interested in another question: Who should ensure security? The state, or each person's own?

The state has its own problems, so much more needs to be taken away and divided, and you're here talking about ensuring some kind of security. It's not time for that. The elite are making money, don't stop them from robbing the country.

[ximkim]

Security shortcomings have been identified at a number of critical facilities. These facilities may soon be placed under temporary external management.

It is clear that he is an executor of Putin and Mishustin.
What is unclear is what these shortcomings are in the work to ensure their safety.
It seems that the current government sees a threat and mistrust in some enterprises, since they themselves created this mistrust.

[snow mountain]

Quote: Hunter 2

Who will participate in these “closed discussions” and who will make decisions...

Who has a vested interest in this?

[Chernorechye]

There's no room left to brand Dinis Manturov. He's hogging everything and can't seem to get enough. The new aristocracy is ripping up the country, and they've cast us as their serfs, and now we're nothing but powerless slaves.
In the elections, United Russia must be completely demolished or we will lose the country.

[call sign_53]

Are you suggesting we vote for the communists? They haven't been what they used to be. :)

[call sign_53]

Did I understand correctly that "external management" means nationalization? Any enterprise whose owners hold dual citizenship can safely be placed under external management.

[Vovavvs]

He probably learned to chat and make empty threats from his boss.