Military Review
Sign in Sign up

Russia blocked the statement of the UN Security Council on Syria

193
At Saturday’s meeting of the UN Security Council, Russia blocked a resolution on the situation in the Syrian city of Quseir, which the United Kingdom proposed, according to the Russia 24 channel. Russia blocked the resolution because of its obvious bias. The Security Council was silent when Quseir was captured by the rebels, and this happened at the very beginning of the war in Syria.


The draft resolution was supposed to express deep concern about the situation in Quseir, where heavy fighting is now taking place: government troops are storming the city, trying to destroy the militants who sat down there.
Originator:
http://www.vesti.ru/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Google News
193 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 2 June 2013 10: 08
    92
    Absolutely right and right decision! Five points ... good
    1. Denis
      Denis 2 June 2013 10: 09
      31
      No one doubted this, the MOST important thing is yet to come.
      1. Chicot 1
        Chicot 1 2 June 2013 10: 18
        24
        Quote: Denis
        The most important thing is yet to come.

        The main thing is already happening now. And it began when Israeli aviation struck targets in Syria, and Western politicians openly and unashamedly announced the possibility of legal supplies of weapons to the so-called. "rebels" ...
        All that follows will be a continuation of the main thing ...
        But the most important thing is that Assad continues the struggle, and does not intend to stop halfway ...
        1. Denis
          Denis 2 June 2013 10: 34
          22
          Quote: Chicot 1
          The main thing is already happening now. And it began when Israeli aircraft attacked

          This is not the main thing, it has already become commonplace against the background of other wars, and the main thing is how Russia will behave further ...
          1. elmir15
            elmir15 2 June 2013 12: 00
            26
            At a Saturday meeting of the UN Security Council, Russia blocked a resolution on the situation in the Syrian city of Quseir, which was proposed by Great Britain,

            England knows very well that Russia will block any steps against Syria, but nevertheless put it to the vote. Apparently, they are trying to put Russia in an unfavorable light or is it some kind of distracting maneuver.
            1. vezunchik
              vezunchik 2 June 2013 12: 14
              12
              The good news is that Russian diplomats have become more active in defending the country's interests!
              1. not good
                not good 2 June 2013 15: 27
                11
                It's nice to see that our Foreign Ministry has teeth growing, let them show more often.
                1. Delink
                  Delink 2 June 2013 16: 43
                  +2
                  Let the grinning smile not close.
              2. Corsair
                Corsair 2 June 2013 23: 41
                +2
                Quote: vezunchik
                The good news is that Russian diplomats have become more active in defending the country's interests!

                Little by little, Russia, as a state with the right to occupy a certain niche, let’s say, in a series of successful powers, is building NEW WORLD ORDER bringing relations between different countries to a qualitatively different level. And to be on this !!!
                1. Roman_999
                  Roman_999 4 June 2013 01: 49
                  +1
                  I think if the time has come to BUILD A NEW ORDER, then let it be done according to OUR standards, and therefore JUST on the inevitability of retaliation and HONEST in essence.
                  For various reasons, it is believed that the NEW ORDER is only for Anglo-Saxons and THEIR WORLD BANKING SYSTEM with material appendages in the form of an ARMY, police apparatus and modern means of surveillance.
                  So HERE, the time has come to SHOW that the World is many years old, that BEFORE the British and the British LIVED people and there was a History, that THEY are only a part, not a big but real PART of the modern WORLD, I note from myself that it is not the best.
            2. edge
              edge 2 June 2013 12: 50
              +5
              Quote: elmir15
              Apparently, they are trying to put Russia in an unfavorable light or is it some kind of distracting maneuver.

              as the truth goes, water sharpens a stone, if you dig it all the time, you look Russia will give a slack somewhere ....... the Saxons have rich experience of obscene behavior.
            3. VkadimirEfimov1942
              VkadimirEfimov1942 7 June 2013 16: 46
              0
              The UN Security Council resolution clearly shows the main culprit of the war in Syria-England and its satellites.
          2. Eric
            Eric 2 June 2013 12: 27
            31 th
            Quote: Denis
            and the main thing is how Russia will behave further ...

            It is a colleague, it seems to me, will soon be sold, while only the price was filled.
          3. Chicot 1
            Chicot 1 2 June 2013 13: 56
            +4
            Quote: Denis
            The main thing is how Russia will behave further ...

            Russia initially took a position of support for the official authorities of Syria in the person of Bashar al-Assad. And I have no reason to believe that she will change her ...
            But from the moment the Israeli Air Force attacked the territory of Syria, this internal conflict ceased to be exclusively internal, which automatically takes it to a new phase - direct and immediate armed intervention by a third party ...
            At one time, the raids of NATO aircraft brought the intra-Libyan conflict to a new stage of confrontation ... So at the moment the raid, the consequences of the raid of the Israeli Air Force and official statements about the possibility of transferring weapons to the "rebels" are the most significant events for the warring parties in Syria than the UN meetings. ..
      2. Phantom Revolution
        Phantom Revolution 2 June 2013 12: 11
        14
        Quote: Denis
        No one doubted this, the MOST important thing is yet to come.

        Excerpts to the Syrian people in the destruction of terrorists and a speedy victory.
        1. Logician
          Logician 2 June 2013 12: 18
          10
          this suggests that the state has interests ... and therefore it appears the state!
        2. Che
          Che 2 June 2013 14: 56
          +9
          The latest news from Syria is talking about the release of Quseir from rats, I don’t know how reliable, but if so, then the rats must escape from the sinking ship. Assad respected, a true leader of his country.
      3. Onotollah
        Onotollah 2 June 2013 19: 24
        +5
        Quote: Denis
        The most important thing is yet to come.

        Government forces are confidently crushing the Arab Spring hydra. Russia is not
        going to change his beliefs and surrender Assad. And he continues to help him with word and deed. Do not abandon Syria and Iran, judging by the news.
        There is an opinion that Assad and the people loyal to him with friendly support will defend their country, drive out the bandits.
        And now the "main thing" is only for the neighbors who supported the intervention - where will the shortages of the Basmachi run? To Qatar? To the Saudis? To Israel? To a tolerant gayrope?
        In Libya and Iraq ravaged by the war, a special profit is probably not expected ...
      4. Rink
        Rink 2 June 2013 23: 45
        +1
        Ah, well done !!!
        Keep it up!

        Let them get used to the fact that Russia has returned, strong and confident, and does not merge its allies.
    2. Sakhalininsk
      Sakhalininsk 2 June 2013 10: 13
      37
      I absolutely agree with you! It was necessary to add: FOR NOT X ..!
      And at the same time, put on duty on Tartus a couple of Iskander divisions, so that especially violent from Tel Aviv, the anal tightened in the eye of a needle.
      1. Simon
        Simon 2 June 2013 20: 26
        0
        Yes, and put the S-300, so that without the flight zone of Syria help create over the country.
    3. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 2 June 2013 13: 26
      16
      Syrian army frees three villages west of Damascus airport



      Units of the Syrian army on Friday, May 31, continued their offensive against gangs in the East Ghouta area near Damascus. The result of the fighting on this day was the liberation of several towns west of the international airport.

      The shelters of bandit groups were finally defeated and security was restored in the villages of Sikka (Ska), Tel Sikka, Dalbe and Mansur, the SANA agency reports. Most of the members of the armed groups were destroyed, their remnants fled to the south and west.

      On the same day, a group of Islamists was blocked in the village of al-Matakhin al-Guzlyaniye. Between the airport and the village of Guzlyaniya, in the area of ​​the mill, the bandit group together with its field commander was completely destroyed.

      On May 29-30, government forces launched several powerful strikes against Islamist groups in East Ghouta. Most of the districts were liberated, but local groups still remain near the international airport right up to the road to Seyid Zeynab (Bahdaliya, Huseyniya, Ad-Diyabiya).

      The elimination of gangs in Guzliania will completely protect the territory of Damascus International Airport. From this settlement to the runway (runway) is only about 3 kilometers. To date, the Syrian army is in full control of the area around the airport and the road to it at a distance of at least half a kilometer.
      1. not good
        not good 2 June 2013 15: 30
        +3
        Good news, I would like more often.
      2. Bort radist
        Bort radist 2 June 2013 18: 08
        +4
        Quote: Sith Lord
        To date, the Syrian army is in full control of the area around the airport and the road to it at a distance of at least half a kilometer.

        The site was being prepared for the delivery of "humanitarian aid", but here is such a bummer.
    4. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 2 June 2013 14: 43
      +5
      And how did China behave? what about this there is no information anywhere ?!
      1. Mr.M
        Mr.M 2 June 2013 18: 37
        +3
        China apparently kept silent, in Xinhua not a word about this UN statement.

        Yes, and, unfortunately, the matter seems to have gone no further than a joint veto on a resolution with China. At least I did not see information about the active assistance of the PRC to the ruling regime of the SAR.

        P.S. So, it turns out that hopes for the BRICS as a new center of geopolitics and global influence are still somewhat premature, but it's a pity.
        1. old man54
          old man54 3 June 2013 01: 42
          0
          China is not eligible for a decision by the UN Security Council! There, only three countries have such a right!
    5. nycsson
      nycsson 2 June 2013 17: 07
      +2
      All this is good, only the UN has not been credible to them for a long time!
    6. pav-pon1972
      pav-pon1972 2 June 2013 18: 28
      +4
      And China somehow quietly glanced to the side aside .... not heard, not visible ...
      1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
        GELEZNII_KAPUT 2 June 2013 18: 31
        +1
        Here I am talking about the same thing, the Chinese will substitute us! and we will!belay
      2. nycsson
        nycsson 2 June 2013 19: 16
        +3
        Quote: pav-pon1972
        And China somehow quietly glanced to the side aside .... not heard, not visible ...

        Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
        Here I am talking about the same thing, the Chinese will substitute us! and we will!

        The Chinese are wise people! Once again they won’t get into trouble!
    7. Arkan
      Arkan 3 June 2013 03: 05
      +3
      The Kremlin raised its "geopolitical stake" in the Mediterranean by sending the heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov there, writes Business Insider. This ship is extremely impressive, and the decision to use it is another link in a series of mutual injections between Russia and the United States.
      “It is planned that he will come out and perform a number of tasks in the far ocean zone as part of the group,” said Admiral Viktor Chirkov, Commander-in-Chief of the Navy. The cruiser, the publication continues, carries several carrier-based fighters and helicopters, missile systems, anti-submarine systems. The crew of the ship totals 2 people.

      "Admiral Kuznetsov" - the only aircraft carrier in the Navy. Therefore, notes Business Insider, his appearance in the Mediterranean can be safely regarded as a clear signal of the seriousness of Russia's intentions to protect its interests in the region. Some of these interests are directly related, for example, to the fate of Syria and the naval base in Tartus.

      Russia has repeatedly sent its ships to the Mediterranean Sea, recalls a resource. All of them protect Bashar al-Assad and "the land of his ancestors." And this is not counting the countless amounts of firearms, artillery and just the money that he received during the 26 months of the conflict. “No wonder Assad doesn't even think of retreating,” concludes Business Insider.
    8. Ejik_026
      Ejik_026 3 June 2013 09: 17
      +3
      Absolutely agree. Although Russia is acting like a real ally with Syria. It is a pity that Libya was merged because of this woodpecker-bear. If Putin were in power, hell would be leaked.
    9. Mujahiddin777
      Mujahiddin777 6 June 2013 03: 47
      +1
      Now is the time to put the Mi-25 turntables and the multi-purpose MiG-29M and M2 there !!! yes The tryndets of democratization has come !!! wink
  2. pensioner
    pensioner 2 June 2013 10: 12
    14
    It is from there that they scream that if the Army enters there, there will be massacre! There are 50000 of them. And the Army will enter there ...
  3. Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 2 June 2013 10: 14
    +6
    They begin to "break through" the situation.
    We now have to answer.
    1. Nick
      Nick 2 June 2013 10: 31
      +6
      Quote: Dmitry 2246
      They begin to "break through" the situation.
      We now have to answer.

      The answer was given! And it’s quite worthy.
  4. Sirocco
    Sirocco 2 June 2013 10: 15
    18
    Interestingly, what was the Security Council counting on? I would rename this organization to Without conscience. I can’t wait to see the moment when these rebels rush to Europe.
    1. self-propelled
      self-propelled 2 June 2013 10: 36
      26
      well, if they flood into Europe, grief will be enough for everyone. but the fact that Russia finally began to defend its position cannot but rejoice! and put on all of these Security Councils (or BezSovy)
      1. Sirocco
        Sirocco 2 June 2013 11: 04
        +8
        Quote: self-propelled
        well, if they flood into Europe, grief will be enough for everyone.

        Just for this reason, I got the opinion that the EU is being merged for the sake of the interests of the United States. An interesting situation is developing, at first they set fire to Sev. Africa, then the Middle East, is now let into the West. So to say, PAL was launched against Russia. No matter how they burn themselves.
        1. elmir15
          elmir15 2 June 2013 12: 03
          +8
          It’s profitable for America to start wars and instability around the world, as it exposes itself as an island of stability to attract capital and the hardness of the dollar, so the dollar had to be painted not green but red blood color
          1. Mr.M
            Mr.M 2 June 2013 20: 18
            +3
            It is purely sportingly interesting which country will be the first to have enough chess thinking, resources and intrigue to play the same game on this "island of stability" - North America ..
            1. Semen Semyonitch
              Semen Semyonitch 3 June 2013 04: 35
              0
              Are you a dreamer?
        2. old man54
          old man54 3 June 2013 01: 44
          0
          do not piss !!!
    2. nycsson
      nycsson 2 June 2013 17: 09
      +3
      Quote: Sirocco
      I can’t wait to see the moment when these rebels rush to Europe.

      They will rush not to Europe, but to the Caucasus.
      1. ksandr45
        ksandr45 3 June 2013 12: 44
        +1
        Qatar will most likely take revenge on us. No, of course, someone will return home, and not only to Europe, but the part that is fighting for the loot and not a timid dozen will add work to our security forces.
    3. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 3 June 2013 03: 52
      0
      ... or SovBezSov-without any conscience.
  5. zgenia44
    zgenia44 2 June 2013 10: 15
    +1
    But is this UN Security Council needed at all?
    1. Mr.M
      Mr.M 2 June 2013 10: 18
      39
      As long as Russia has the right to veto, it is needed. Western "colleagues" will break less firewood.
      1. Suhov
        Suhov 2 June 2013 12: 30
        +3
        Quote: Mr.M
        As long as Russia has a veto, it’s needed. Western "colleagues" will break less firewood.

        That's right.
        A hot war is not a continuation of politics, but a defeat of politics.
        1. Midshipman
          Midshipman 3 June 2013 10: 04
          +1
          Add: for the weak side
      2. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 3 June 2013 03: 56
        0
        This cannot go on for long. Russia in the Security Council is now like a bone in the throat ... They can change the voting system.
    2. Day 11
      Day 11 2 June 2013 13: 50
      20
      In fact, the UN is now not so much a worldwide organization as an organization for the Americans, acting at the request of the American aggressors.

      Stalin I. V., "Pravda", 1951
      1. Jrvin
        Jrvin 2 June 2013 14: 19
        12
        All the same, Joseph Vissarionovich knew the truth about the UN back in 1951 ...
        1. not good
          not good 2 June 2013 15: 32
          +3
          Yes, and Khrushchev, the calm one, not in vain with his shoe, was pounding on a slider ...
          1. kavkaz8888
            kavkaz8888 3 June 2013 01: 18
            +2
            Khrushchev-cormorant. It would be better to tap on the bald shoulders. At first glance it seems ridiculous, and to think, a clowning.
            It is unworthy of the ruler of a Great country to conduct such behavior.
        2. Stalinets
          Stalinets 2 June 2013 17: 10
          +4
          Not only knew, but spoke aloud .. yes
  6. Mr.M
    Mr.M 2 June 2013 10: 16
    13
    That's right, let the comrades from Great Britain express their "concern" somewhere else.

    We wish success to the government troops of the SAR!
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 2 June 2013 10: 19
      +7
      Quote: Mr.M
      That's right, let the comrades from Great Britain express their "concern" somewhere else.


      A variety of poker players are always preoccupied with their anal bodily itching.
  7. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 2 June 2013 10: 23
    +5
    UN litter of the USA .. !!! The truth is with us !!
    1. Stalinets
      Stalinets 2 June 2013 17: 11
      +1
      Not true. UN, the brainchild of the United States with all the consequences ... yes
      1. nycsson
        nycsson 2 June 2013 17: 30
        0
        Quote: Stalinist
        Not true. UN, the brainchild of the United States with all the consequences ..

        Right! Now think, why all this masquerade !?
  8. zgenia44
    zgenia44 2 June 2013 10: 24
    0
    Quote: Mr.M
    As long as Russia has the right to veto, it is needed. Western "colleagues" will break less firewood.

    It is necessary to reform this organization. There have already been cases when the resolution is distorted or countries act bypassing the UN mandate.
    1. self-propelled
      self-propelled 2 June 2013 10: 39
      +1
      Quote: zgenia44
      It is necessary to reform this organization.

      is it necessary? What is the use of this organization if some states "put" on all their resolutions and orders?
    2. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 2 June 2013 14: 03
      +2
      Do not reform, but change the headquarters. Settle in St. Petersburg or Yekaterinburg, and there will be a normal UN, NOT AMERICAN.
      1. Michelle
        Michelle 2 June 2013 18: 40
        0
        Then everyone will scream about her prophecy, and the stink will be more than once
      2. lelikas
        lelikas 2 June 2013 20: 10
        +1
        Quote: We are from Tambov ...
        Settle in St. Petersburg or Yekaterinburg,

        Nah, just not in St. Petersburg - enough of their own. It’s better to go to Eburg - let them sit there, but for one remind them that it was here that the family of the last king was shot - let them break their heads - which we again had in mind.
        1. Gromily4
          Gromily4 2 June 2013 20: 57
          0
          Here in Yekaterinburg is not necessary. And without them there are a lot of traffic jams, but with them, in general, everything will rise.
          Especially tomorrow, even Putin arrives. It’s better not to appear in the city by car.
          Let them go to Perm or Chelyabinsk.
      3. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 3 June 2013 04: 30
        0
        Who donates a girl, and her dance.
    3. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 3 June 2013 04: 33
      0
      Do not tell me the format?
  9. zgenia44
    zgenia44 2 June 2013 10: 26
    +4
    Quote: MIKHAN
    UN litter of the USA .. !!! The truth is with us !!

    Right! "Who pays, he calls the tune"
    Ten leading countries in terms of contributions to fund United Nations peacekeeping operations in 2013-2015 [A / 67/224]:
    United States (27,14%)
    Japan (12,53%)
    United Kingdom (8,15%)
    Germany (8,02%)
    France (7,55%)
    Italy (5,00%)
    China (3,93%)
    Canada (3,21%)
    Spain (3,18%)
    Republic of Korea (2,26%)
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 2 June 2013 20: 12
      +2
      Italy ... Spain ... Hmm. What are they doing here? Is there a lot of money?
      1. Hudo
        Hudo 2 June 2013 20: 18
        +3
        Quote: retired
        Italy ... Spain ... Hmm. What are they doing here? Is there a lot of money?

        Not enough money. Ponte a lot.
        1. terp 50
          terp 50 7 June 2013 07: 12
          0
          ... far away on ponah?
    2. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 2 June 2013 20: 29
      +2
      zgenia44
      Right! "Who pays, he calls the tune"
      Ten leading countries in terms of contributions to fund United Nations peacekeeping operations in 2013-2015 [A / 67/224]:
      United States (27,14%)
      Japan (12,53%)
      United Kingdom (8,15%)

      The Yankees from all these operations have a profit of 1000 times more than all other UN members combined.
      If you want to legally rob entire states, get yourself a UN.
      The Yankees realized this already in 1953 when they invaded Korea under the UN flag.
      1. Day 11
        Day 11 2 June 2013 20: 41
        +3
        The Yankees fought since 1950 (from the very beginning), and this massacre ended in July 1953
  10. pilot-mk
    pilot-mk 2 June 2013 10: 27
    15
    Let the little girls attend to the creation of their own constitution, and also let them replace the country's leader, 60 years in power is not democratic.
  11. Semurg
    Semurg 2 June 2013 10: 27
    +4
    Politics is still a dirty business. That’s Yemen, the underbelly of Saudi Islamists is being pressed hard by UAVs from the USA for days and everyone who hasn’t hidden rockets. And the same Islamists are given a green corridor to Syria and throw up arms. Now and through the UN they want a roof yes. It’s a dirty business of a politician, I’d better go further along the taxi to talk with People.
  12. avt
    avt 2 June 2013 10: 29
    +7
    Och .. are universal people for the loot invested in perfume laughing Looks really great Assad pressed the darlings once the impudent people from the United Kingdom moved. And maybe what kind of "advisers" were put there?
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 2 June 2013 17: 33
      +1
      Quote: avt
      Och .. are universal people for the loot invested in perfume

      These "common people" at one time "bent" the USSR in full! So, don't underestimate them!
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 2 June 2013 18: 01
        0
        Quote: nycsson
        These "common people" at one time "bent" the USSR in full! So, don't underestimate them!

        They bent down - it is said loudly, the bending board did not grow at the west, they did a rather dirty trick - yes.
        1. nycsson
          nycsson 2 June 2013 18: 08
          +2
          Quote: Setrac
          Bent down - loudly said

          This is still put it mildly. Face the truth.
          Quote: Setrac
          a rather big dirty trick - yes.

          A dirty trick? Small children commit dirty tricks .........
        2. Michelle
          Michelle 2 June 2013 19: 22
          +1
          Said QUIET, very QUIET. Before them, Attila succeeded, and then by his wildness ...
          1. old man54
            old man54 3 June 2013 01: 51
            0
            Attila, handsome, what are you? Slav, set the floor of Europe as a medieval cancer, because the trends were then back then!
      2. Tambov we ...
        Tambov we ... 2 June 2013 20: 19
        +1
        Gorbi - passed, and the EBN drunk and stupid drifted away, conducting the orchestra. And to catch up - the intestines are painfully tolerant.
      3. Corsair5912
        Corsair5912 3 June 2013 19: 29
        0
        Quote: nycsson
        Quote: avt
        Och .. are universal people for the loot invested in perfume

        These "common people" at one time "bent" the USSR in full! So, don't underestimate them!

        Euros can not even bother anyone theoretically, they themselves are standing in front of the USA in the pose of a drinking deer, with a dirty green noose around their neck.
        And Yusovtsy were able to bend only spotted Gorbi with Shimparnadze and Benya with his rat team of Chubaisoids.
        The USSR is divided administratively, and even then temporarily.
  13. d_trader
    d_trader 2 June 2013 10: 32
    +3
    Meanness has no boundaries ..
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 2 June 2013 10: 47
      +7
      Quote: d_trader
      Meanness has no boundaries ..

      This is not meanness, but a planned provocation!
      Now the whole Western press will spread the terrible shots from the city around the world, with comments ......... and the Russians do not want peace!
      Then, of course, they will sort it out and may even apologize, but the time has passed - the effect is achieved!
      1. Illyria
        Illyria 2 June 2013 11: 24
        11
        Already smashed. I went to gazeta.ru, there, in the comments on this topic, we were justified .. and they called us scumbags that we also support the Assad terrorists against the entire civilized world of the Prem, who wants Syria peace, and we interfere with them with our actions. In this way, we will soon be accused of all mortal sins.
        1. Ulysses
          Ulysses 2 June 2013 11: 34
          11
          Do not read the newspaper in the morning.
          And do not read in the evening either.
          Nothing good will be written about Russia there. No.
          1. kavkaz8888
            kavkaz8888 3 June 2013 01: 24
            +2
            We must read. We must consider the propaganda of the enemy.
        2. smile
          smile 2 June 2013 14: 46
          12
          Illyria
          Yes, we have long been accused of all mortal and immortal sins, they just won’t be able to come up with something new — they exhausted their imagination at the beginning of the 20th century ...
          Quote from The Times, 1838:
          From the borders of Hungary to the heart of Burma and Nepal, the Russian devil is relentlessly pursuing and tormenting all human race, relentlessly doing its evil deed, irritating our hardworking and exceptionally peaceful empire ...
          Agree, it's hard to add anything significant to this. So what, says Ulysses, - do not read the newspaper, lie ... drop "kaku" - you can get dirty. :))))
          1. Che
            Che 2 June 2013 15: 05
            +1
            Captively and frankly put this stuff.
            Quote: smile
            So what, says Ulysses, - do not read the newspaper, lie ... drop "kaku" - you can get dirty. :))))
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 2 June 2013 10: 42
    +2
    The UN is essentially an organization that must suppress all conflicts in the world (up to the introduction of peacekeeping military forces between the warring parties ..) Now the UN (and the last 20 years) in my opinion is an irritant to war ..
    1. Michelle
      Michelle 2 June 2013 19: 35
      0
      The UN is a necessary organization as a regulator of the world. It’s like a viral-type illness - drink an antibiotic not approved by the doctor, but the result will still be. Although not always positive, but painful VIRUSES will still manifest themselves.
  16. Massik
    Massik 2 June 2013 10: 49
    +2
    Is prostitution ending in our elite ??? Did their sense of dignity erupt ??? They just don’t have to say that they are so ingenious, they were silent for 13 years because the country was unprepared, and now something has settled on our feet got up.
  17. RUS-36
    RUS-36 2 June 2013 11: 01
    +9
    UN political prostitute ..
    1. Humpty
      Humpty 2 June 2013 11: 13
      +7
      Yeah . The stupid thief of Anan was replaced by a handy dog-eater Moon.
      1. Corsair5912
        Corsair5912 2 June 2013 14: 47
        +5
        Quote: Humpty
        Yeah . The stupid thief of Anan was replaced by a handy dog-eater Moon.

        Anan, who had coffee, sat on a hook at the Yusovsk special services, as an amateur of 10 year old white boys, and did everything that was ordered from the Oral Office. Moon has his own hook.
        1. kavkaz8888
          kavkaz8888 3 June 2013 01: 29
          0
          Yes sir!
          In Masonic, pull on the eggs on something and use as needed
  18. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 2 June 2013 11: 12
    -7
    from the Don.
    Unfortunately, unfortunately, Assad will not be allowed to win, despite our support. Such are the realities.
    1. Nitup
      Nitup 2 June 2013 11: 25
      +3
      Quote: borisjdin1957
      from the Don.
      Unfortunately, unfortunately, Assad will not be allowed to win, despite our support. Such are the realities.

      How so?
    2. Ulysses
      Ulysses 2 June 2013 11: 40
      10
      The reality is that after two years of fighting, there has been an obvious turning point in favor of the legitimate government of Syria.
      The USA somehow doesn’t tear, and Europe simply cannot.
      In such circumstances, we just need to support Syria in the Security Council and help financially.
      1. Michelle
        Michelle 2 June 2013 19: 44
        0
        Apparently with a bear in direct contact, it’s more expensive. Apparently, other monkeys will carry chestnuts for their Kaa.
    3. Simon
      Simon 2 June 2013 20: 34
      0
      And where did you get such realities from? Grandma whispered in her ear.
  19. treskoed
    treskoed 2 June 2013 11: 20
    11
    Russia blocked the resolution because of its apparent partiality.

    The more uncompromising Russia will use the veto, the higher will be its authority in the world! Some will respect, others will be afraid!
  20. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 2 June 2013 11: 21
    +5
    Quote: borisjdin1957
    from the Don.
    Unfortunately, unfortunately, Assad will not be allowed to win, despite our support. Such are the realities.

    I think so too .. (they’ll kill him ..) Russia needs to keep its position tightly .. no matter what .. then we will take revenge .. our time has not come yet ..
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 2 June 2013 19: 19
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      . Then revenge .. our time has not come yet ..


      If you clap your ears for a very long time, then our time runs the risk of not coming!
  21. dmnatbor
    dmnatbor 2 June 2013 11: 28
    +3
    They somehow vetoed this .....
    We need this to decide.
    Or stand, or bend.
  22. My address
    My address 2 June 2013 11: 48
    +4
    And shout at all crossroads about meanness (call it dishonesty) of the NAZY West. Shout long, loud and convincing. On the squeaks of their media respond adequately, including filing in the relevant courts. In short, the Foreign Ministry is getting used to not sleeping and waging its war.
    1. Michelle
      Michelle 2 June 2013 20: 07
      +6
      The Ministry of Foreign Affairs must not endure slap in the face and turn the other cheek ... And not allow the situation leading to this. Or maybe just hire people with iron eggs - UNLOCK your fly and show the bolt.
      1. Hudo
        Hudo 2 June 2013 20: 14
        +1
        Quote: Michelle
        . Or maybe just hire people with iron eggs - UNLOCK your fly and show the bolt.


        Just show a little! At least follow the democratizers' faces in an intricate trajectory, and it is better to blow them in such a way that the democratic foam from all the holes floats. Then respect!
  23. shalk
    shalk 2 June 2013 11: 48
    +8
    Quote: dmnatbor
    We need this to decide.
    Or stand, or bend.


    What is the uncertainty in Russia's position regarding the events in Syria? And where is the deflection seen? The imposed "veto" means that "we definitely stand".
  24. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 2 June 2013 11: 50
    +5
    In Eurasia, you need to create your own UN .. Anglo-Saxons insolently poison us and pump oil .. they think that their ocean will save .. South and North America, the continents became quiet for a long time .. Hugo Chavez tried to change something, died .. (and very quickly) ..Nikaragua we must remember ..Kuba .. It's time to go on the offensive .. politically and militarily ..
    1. Michelle
      Michelle 2 June 2013 20: 14
      0
      I support. Create an analogue of the UN with peacekeeping troops and interstate agreements on peacekeeping operations at its discretion.
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 2 June 2013 21: 17
        0
        Quote: Michelle
        I support. Create an analogue of the UN with peacekeeping troops and interstate agreements on peacekeeping operations at its discretion.

        The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) is that organization, developing it focusing on the military component.
    2. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 2 June 2013 20: 26
      +1
      To go on such an offensive, you need to have a lot of money. Remember the times of the Union when they fed everyone on the palm trees.
  25. Alikovo
    Alikovo 2 June 2013 11: 54
    +1
    once I wrote that he was a henchman of amers, and here is a confirmation of that.
  26. fenix57
    fenix57 2 June 2013 11: 55
    10
    "The draft resolution was intended to express deep concern ..."-Let your "concern" be transferred to the territory of Geyropa and the United States ... it's high time! The UN does not know what is going on with the "owners" .. Although an order is an order.
  27. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 2 June 2013 11: 55
    +6
    It is good that there is Russia in the UN Security Council. Western "democrats" will not be able to stretch their anti-Syrian resolutions. Russia is the stronghold of justice at the UN
  28. KENTAVROS
    KENTAVROS 2 June 2013 11: 56
    +5
    Russia already looks much more serious, and China was well attracted. RUSSIA and CHINA = UNBEATABLE!
    1. Logician
      Logician 2 June 2013 12: 21
      +4
      Russia is invincible! ... without the impurity of China!
  29. andrei332809
    andrei332809 2 June 2013 12: 02
    +8
    No, well, what kind of country is Russia all the time against democracy. There are some remnants of the Cold War. We don’t understand that the Western peers want us only good and prosperity.
    1. Michelle
      Michelle 2 June 2013 20: 16
      +2
      And from what century Was it different?
  30. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 2 June 2013 12: 37
    18
    Right now in Turkey and a number of European countries are held anti-government demonstrations, and for some reason the UN Security Council does not raise the issue of military "assistance" to the demonstrators, but they also want their government to resign ...
  31. orff
    orff 2 June 2013 12: 41
    0
    BRUSSELS, June 2 - RIA Novosti. European Union diplomacy head Catherine Ashton calls on Sunday for Syrian authorities and rebels to urgently open access for NGO representatives to Al Quseir in western Syria, where government forces are conducting a military operation against the main stronghold of the rebels on the border with Lebanon.
    According to the UN, in Al Quseyr, which has become the scene of fierce fighting between government forces and armed rebels, about 1,5 thousand wounded civilians are blocked.

    РИА Новости http://ria.ru/arab_sy/20130602/940807657.html#ixzz2V38JW6KS
    1. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 2 June 2013 13: 00
      +7
      Why open what would the militants go out or put guns there for the militants? Anglo-Saxons, as always, think that they are smarter than everyone.
  32. vitek1233
    vitek1233 2 June 2013 12: 44
    +2
    the string is pulled.
  33. Day 11
    Day 11 2 June 2013 12: 49
    24
    For the mood!!! wink
    1. ded
      ded 2 June 2013 15: 46
      +2
      Cool song! Still to know what there is sung.
    2. pensioner
      pensioner 2 June 2013 17: 36
      +5
      Thanks Den! They don’t hide their faces. Yes, and all faces are HUMAN.
  34. dc120mm
    dc120mm 2 June 2013 12: 51
    +7
    Russia blocked the statement of the UN Security Council on Syria

    correctly done!
  35. Lopatov
    Lopatov 2 June 2013 12: 58
    +6
    This is a setup. Russia was once again presented as "the main obstacle to peace in Syria"
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 2 June 2013 17: 12
      +1
      Quote: Spade
      This is a setup. Russia was once again presented as "the main obstacle to peace in Syria"

      At least one sober thought! hi Plus to you!
    2. Arkan
      Arkan 2 June 2013 20: 42
      +2
      Quote: Spade
      This is a setup.

      And what difference is it now? The protests that started in Turkey have already spread to Europe, what they will lead to is not yet known, but a situation is possible in which some anti-Syrian governments will have to give up power.
  36. Fofan
    Fofan 2 June 2013 13: 00
    +1
    Quote: Chicot 1
    Absolutely right and right decision! Five points ... good

    absolutely wrong decision! our diplomats are only defending! why don’t they start a UN investigation to find out where the rebels came from? everyone knows that the UAE and others like them supply them with weapons and advisers! so why are our silent ??? again Yeltsin mattresses picked up in diplomats ???
    1. stranik72
      stranik72 2 June 2013 13: 52
      +7
      Not everything is so simple, to raise the level of erudition on the work of the UN, type in the search engine the principles of the UN, how resolutions are adopted, how the agenda is even agreed, everything is complicated there, it was when the USSR and the bloc of socialist countries made such decisions easier, there was a quorum supporters, and now, we are most often alone, so diplomacy is primarily the capabilities of the state, and rarely with a weak state and without allies, only with the help of diplomacy can strategic issues be resolved. So, that "on a senka and a hat."
  37. shamil
    shamil 2 June 2013 13: 09
    +2
    it is necessary in Europe, gay parades that are arranged, seeking their rights with gays and lisbians, are called an opposition fighting for their democracy and arm and have nothing to do. The circus will be
  38. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 2 June 2013 13: 14
    +9
    Quote: Fofan
    Quote: Chicot 1
    Absolutely right and right decision! Five points ... good

    absolutely wrong decision! our diplomats are only defending! why don’t they start a UN investigation to find out where the rebels came from? everyone knows that the UAE and others like them supply them with weapons and advisers! so why are our silent ??? again Yeltsin mattresses picked up in diplomats ???

    The forum is easy to indicate ... And in real life, our diplomats are on the brink .. (mates) that they expect from us .. patience and a firm course .. !! at the same time build up the military presence and, most importantly, the special services .. are working hard for this situation .. (a lot depends on their work .. now there is a war of special services ..)
  39. Zheka Varangian
    Zheka Varangian 2 June 2013 13: 14
    11
    Hello everyone! Great news! Russia and Syria directly act simultaneously: one blocks all sorts of resolutions at the UN, the other blocks militant groups and wets them!
  40. Dimanrus86
    Dimanrus86 2 June 2013 13: 18
    +2
    Keep it up! Well done)
  41. sergo0000
    sergo0000 2 June 2013 13: 20
    +2
    http://contrpost.com/en/78-2013-05-10-13-45-19/3208-2013-05-30-00-48-40
    Assad seems to have managed to do what not a single Israeli prime minister managed to do! bully hi Good luck comrade! drinks
  42. vasik
    vasik 2 June 2013 13: 24
    +2
    The persistence of the RF leadership is amazing. Having surrendered Syria, Russia will open the way to itself, beloved. All is fair here. One cannot hope for the "decency" of the West. The last video with the mercenary eating hearts removed the Western inhabitants, now the Anglo-Saxons need to atone for their sins, but the last "lifting of the embargo" untied everyone's hands.
  43. Zheka Varangian
    Zheka Varangian 2 June 2013 13: 43
    +5
    Quote: shamil
    it is necessary in Europe, gay parades that are arranged, seeking their rights with gays and lisbians, are called an opposition fighting for their democracy and arm and have nothing to do. The circus will be

    Yes, they’re destroying their countries without weapons. But he introduced a grinded gay with Kalash at the ready and ... crawled under the table laughing laughing laughing
  44. Alexandr0id
    Alexandr0id 2 June 2013 13: 49
    34 th
    Gentlemen, all your love for Assad is explained exclusively by hatred of the states and NATO, the reason for which is the complex of the defeated in the Cold War. if the Iraqis or the Egyptians were drunk asad, everyone would be indifferent.
    the ussr could not stand the competition from the usa, the empire is no more, there is no imperial nation capable of reviving the empire, so you need to calm down, forget about ambitions and deal with internal affairs. the limits of our active foreign policy may be the cis and the baltic countries. an attempt to compete with the United States again across the map may end in the same way - we’ll tear ourselves over, and then Assads and Papuasades will not even remember us with a kind word.
    1. Andrew-001
      Andrew-001 2 June 2013 14: 23
      26
      Quote: Alexandr0id
      Gentlemen, all your love for Assad is explained exclusively by hatred of the states and NATO, the reason for which is the complex of those conquered in the Cold War

      1) All gentlemen in 1917, the grate on his feet and overboard;
      2) Assad - a proper name, is written with a capital letter;
      3) And what then is the complex of the states so beloved by you, because of which they hate ALL in the WORLD so much that they strive to DESTROY ?!
      4) Russians have a good tradition - we do not like it when "big and evil" offend "little and good";
      5) And finally try on a situation for yourself: If I set fire to your yard, then your porch, I don’t give a bunch to the balcony of your apartment - will you say that this is correct or will you try to push me away ?! So Russia is trying to push the zats and arsonist of the United States away from itself.
      1. Alexandr0id
        Alexandr0id 2 June 2013 14: 38
        12 th
        1) not discussed
        2) in my comment finally there are no capital letters
        3) the states have the same complex as the USSR, demolishes the roof of their own strength, so the desire to dictate to everyone and everywhere, this will ultimately fail them.
        4) do not need this hat from Soviet textbooks, "we never attacked, we only defended ourselves" - this is nonsense. Russia in the 18-19 centuries and the USSR since the late 1930s is a very aggressive state. while being the second largest nation after the Chinese, they automatically became large in relation to everyone else.
        5) no, the situation is this - the states are setting fire, and we are throwing coal
        1. Che
          Che 2 June 2013 15: 15
          +2
          Quote: Alexandr0id
          Alexandr0id


          The Faitington regional committee is stepping on the same rake, well, the road is there too. We still need to support other nations in upholding their independence, as is another matter. There are special services for this.
        2. valokordin
          valokordin 2 June 2013 16: 47
          +4
          Quote: Alexandr0id
          5) no, the situation is this - the states are setting fire, and we are throwing coal

          With your logic, we attacked the Japanese in the area of ​​Lake Hassan, on the Khalkhin Gole, attacked Hitler, Poland, Hungary, Austria. They attacked Cuba, Vietnam, Korea, Angola, Congo, Egypt in 1956. etc.
        3. smile
          smile 2 June 2013 17: 06
          +4
          Alexandr0id
          Let me curiosity, what was the aggressiveness of the USSR in the 30s? Is it not that we have returned part of our lands selected by non-aggressive countries?
          About the population of the most non-aggressive British empire - over 550 billion in the thirties - you forgot in time ... about the fact that the United States participated in much more military conflicts than we ... about that, unlike us, they unleashed almost all of them on their own initiative ....
          Question: When you write your similar comments do you intentionally lie, or do you get it because of stupidity and lack of knowledge?
          1. Day 11
            Day 11 2 June 2013 17: 19
            +3
            I didn't understand about the population of the British Empire "over 550 billion in the thirties" ??? drinks
            1. smile
              smile 2 June 2013 17: 48
              +1
              Day 11
              I already repented :))) the population of the British Empire of that time - from about 550 to 565 MILLION ... :)))
          2. smile
            smile 2 June 2013 17: 45
            +2
            smile
            Wildly sorry, prolapse came out - certainly not billions, but millions. Correcting is too late. Unfortunately. :))))
            1. Day 11
              Day 11 2 June 2013 17: 50
              +1
              Yes, I understand, everything is normal, just the mood smile -tomorrow is a day off!
          3. Alexandr0id
            Alexandr0id 3 June 2013 00: 00
            +1
            from the end of the 39th century to the invasions of Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states. not so little in 2 years
            what does the whole population of the British Empire and mandated territories, all the Sikhs, Marathas, Punjabis, Malays, Burmese and Australopithecus have to do with it? how many English were there? For decades, Russians have been the largest sovereign nation on earth. the Chinese do not count - over them until 1911 the Manchus.
            that the us were more aggressive than the ussr - I do not argue, does this make us good pacifists, defenders of the weak and oppressed? I doubt it.
        4. Andrey KZ
          Andrey KZ 2 June 2013 20: 54
          +3
          3) the states have the same complex as the USSR, demolishes the roof of their own strength, so the desire to dictate to everyone and everywhere, this will ultimately fail them.
          So maybe this "in the end" has already come, well, how long can you tolerate their antics? The Germans have already understood that
          The Russian man is used to enduring suffering and resentment ... the injustice caused causes deep moral feelings, although outwardly it is invisible. While the European is trying to avenge his insult, the Russians have learned to endure suffering with fanatical patience.

          If the cup is full, the Russian man rises and a long patience erupts with frantic insane force.
          Let the Americans read this.
    2. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 2 June 2013 14: 37
      12
      cold war defeated complex

      There is no complex, no one has ever defeated us in any war.
      The USSR betrayed the rotten top of the CPSU for its personal selfish interests. For too long they did not clean this viper, as it was in 1937-1938, here the corrupt creatures bred.
      1. Alexandr0id
        Alexandr0id 3 June 2013 00: 03
        +4
        the states defeated us from within, made a dig under the Iron Curtain.
        1. ultra
          ultra 4 June 2013 11: 58
          0
          Quote: Alexandr0id
          the states defeated us from within, made a dig under the Iron Curtain.

          Are you sure you "won"! How does this express?
    3. vBR
      vBR 2 June 2013 17: 18
      +3
      The Soviet Union could not stand the competition with the United States - how much you can repeat this impudent and lying nonsense - but was defeated in the Cold War. And war and competition are completely different things. Entrance to foreign markets outside our block was closed, Western corporations would have been bankrupt. Politically active people were persuaded to abandon communism (the empire of evil, ACS, totalitarianism), and they did not think on their full belly that they held the empire and allowed them to hold a pretty decent club in front of the snout of the West, and sometimes a good kick. But you wrote to the point about the disappearance of the civil nation - I do not know whether it is voluntary or involuntary
    4. bear
      bear 2 June 2013 19: 00
      +6
      And who told you that the cold war ended, judging by what I see, did not end
      and there is no winner yet. And then the United States shout at every step, they say defeated horseradish with two
    5. Shuriken
      Shuriken 2 June 2013 22: 02
      +1
      Gentlemen in Paris.
  45. Ilya Mikhalych
    Ilya Mikhalych 2 June 2013 14: 07
    +7
    I doubt that this political fuss will stop the NATO war machine for a long time. I think in the next 5 years we will have to take up arms.
    1. shamil
      shamil 2 June 2013 17: 53
      +1
      Yes, in NATO countries it will still be necessary to decide who to send to the war. who’s a man in their families and who’s a woman. Arabs filled Europe and colonize it. Have same-sex marriages of children unborn and Arabs multiply.
    2. Yazov
      Yazov 2 June 2013 18: 20
      0
      Well, I guess not 5 years, but 7. No wonder the defense. the order must be completed before 20 years.
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 2 June 2013 21: 21
        +1
        Quote: Yazov
        Well, I guess not 5 years, but 7. No wonder the defense. the order must be completed before 20 years.

        But considering that we, as always, will not be in time, then 5 years will be more correct. Enemies, on the other hand, know that we are undergoing rearmament, so everything will be decided before its completion.
    3. poquello
      poquello 3 June 2013 00: 35
      +2
      "I doubt that this political fuss will stop the NATO military machine for a long time. I think in the next 5 years we will have to take up arms."

      I do not think so, but one must be prepared for any development of events.
      I have an employee fantasizing about processors after 50 years, so I answered him that maybe wooden bills.
      1. poquello
        poquello 3 June 2013 20: 05
        +1
        it is necessary to be to any development of events.

        Where did the script hang on the word "events"? I didn't do it.
  46. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 2 June 2013 14: 11
    +3
    Alexandr0id RU
    ... the Soviet Union could not stand the competition from the United States, the empire is no more, there is no imperial nation capable of reviving the empire, so you need to calm down, forget about ambitions and deal with internal affairs. the limits of our active foreign policy may be the cis and the baltic countries. an attempt to compete with the United States again across the map may end in the same way - we’ll tear ourselves over, and then Assads and Papuasades will not even remember us with a kind word.

    Well, the fact that not a single GOOD case remains UNPUNISHED is an axiom, but I don’t think it’s impossible to show the will and character of Russia in the WORLD arena, otherwise America and Britons can decide that with Russia it is possible just like with Yugoslavia , Iraq, Libya and other countries in which they are no longer out of the blue, but openly conducted or are conducting hostilities on the territory of these countries.
    1. Alexandr0id
      Alexandr0id 2 June 2013 14: 31
      +3
      amers and shavers, though villains, do not go to crawl into a 0 million nuclear-weapon country. Of course, we are no longer a superpower, but we did not become Yugoslavia or Libya.
      1. TS3sta3
        TS3sta3 2 June 2013 15: 53
        +5
        from your words:
        1) amers and shaves are villains, but not
        2) we are 140 million nuclear weapon country
        3) amers and Britons will not climb to us as they climbed into Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, etc.
        attention to the question: who then are we, if not a weak, small, unarmed state, and at the same time not Amer’s allies, hangers-on, sixes? There is only one answer: we are a superpower, and you have an inferiority complex. You should see a doctor.
        1. Alexandr0id
          Alexandr0id 3 June 2013 11: 21
          +4
          we are a large state, I did not deny this, but emphasized it. but to be a superpower now means to be equal to the states, i.e. challenge their dominance around the world. we are not able to do this, moreover, in our "show-offs" we can overstrain. our economy is just as defective as in the USSR (resources and more or less lively and competitive military-industrial complex, nothing else). now there is one real candidate for the place of the rivals of the United States - China. in a smart way, you need to let them fight, let them waste their strength in the race for leadership. and our resources should be directed at making sure that, at least once in history, it is not a scarecrow for the whole world, but a normal, comfortable country for living.
          1. Andrew-001
            Andrew-001 3 June 2013 12: 20
            +2
            If you served, you must remember the thesis that defense must be active and layered in depth... We do not at all strive to be a "scarecrow for the whole world", we only defend ourselves. And Syria is our first echelon.
            What to do if Western "partners" do not allow our country to live in peace, do not allow to build
            Quote: Alexandr0id
            normal, comfortable country

            The West needs a weak and defenseless Russia. And to me, as a citizen - strong and powerful.
      2. Setrac
        Setrac 2 June 2013 16: 18
        +1
        Quote: Alexandr0id
        amers and shavers, though villains, do not go to crawl into a 0 million nuclear-weapon country. Of course, we are no longer a superpower, but we did not become Yugoslavia or Libya.

        You really decide how something, AJJJ 140 million or only 140 million? And which country in the modern world is stronger than Russia to take away our "superpower" status?
        1. Alexandr0id
          Alexandr0id 3 June 2013 11: 22
          +3
          just 140 million
          China
  47. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 2 June 2013 14: 25
    +3
    The diplomats sitting at the UN should work for Russia, and not the Yusovites, should they wave it, otherwise why are they needed?
    There, there are a lot of followers there, starting from the very top of the UN, who care more about their selfish interests.
  48. lemal
    lemal 2 June 2013 14: 54
    +5
    Well damn it, keep it up !!! Bashar al-Assad we are with you !!!
  49. fenix57
    fenix57 2 June 2013 15: 10
    +8
    Quote: vitek1233
    the string is pulled.

    The noose has already tightened around the "neck" of the US government:
    1. Zheka Varangian
      Zheka Varangian 2 June 2013 15: 25
      +1
      Quote: fenix57

      The noose has already tightened around the "neck" of the US government:

      Yes, it would be nice if Vanga’s prediction comes true. The whole world will breathe calmly.
      1. nycsson
        nycsson 2 June 2013 18: 06
        +1
        Quote: Zheka Varangian
        Yes, it would be nice if Vanga’s prediction comes true. The whole world will breathe calmly.

        Vanga predicted this, that the blood in my veins would freeze ... According to her predictions, it wouldn’t seem to anyone, including us .......
        1. Zheka Varangian
          Zheka Varangian 2 June 2013 18: 57
          0
          Alexei, I meant the prediction about the 44th US President
  50. pensioner
    pensioner 2 June 2013 15: 14
    0
    A message from the Australian Foreign Ministry has just passed. Australian Foreign Minister advocates Assad's participation in the Syria Peace Conference !!! Oh how! what do I think he blunders on command. And no other way ...
    1. Day 11
      Day 11 2 June 2013 15: 20
      0
      Bang on the road? Or how with Chavez?
      1. pensioner
        pensioner 2 June 2013 16: 48
        +1
        It seems that all the scientists ... Take action.