Archer 8×8 vs. Archer 6×6: Why Sweden is changing its chassis and beefing up its artillery

5 415 23
Archer 8×8 vs. Archer 6×6: Why Sweden is changing its chassis and beefing up its artillery
The Archer self-propelled gun in its original configuration is based on the Volvo A30 6×6 chassis.


Following the sale and transfer of some Archer self-propelled artillery systems abroad, the Swedish Army is refurbishing and expanding its fleet. In August, the first four vehicles with modern configurations were delivered, with two more expected in the fall. The customer expects to receive all 48 new self-propelled artillery systems by the end of the decade. However, the final fleet size will depend on the fate of the 24 vehicles with the previous version.



First batch


On September 13, 2023, the Swedish Defence Material Administration (FMV) and BAE Systems Bofors signed a contract for the production of 48 Archer 8×8 self-propelled howitzers. The contractor planned to deliver the first vehicle to FMV in 2025, with the entire order expected to be completed no later than 2030.

This program has several distinct stages. The manufacturer delivers the FMV vehicles, followed by acceptance and testing, and only then are the vehicles delivered to the armed forces. The first firing of the Archer 8x8 took place in October 2025.

According to BAE Systems, the ceremony took place on August 25 at the Villingsberg proving ground. The following day, the FMV announced the delivery of the first four self-propelled guns to the armed forces. The new vehicles were delivered to the 9th Bergslagen Regiment. artillery regiment (A 9 Bergslagens artilleriregemente).

The first four self-propelled guns will be used for personnel training. By the end of autumn, Regiment A 9 is scheduled to receive two more self-propelled guns; all six vehicles in the first training group are intended for artillery training. They are then planned to be integrated into the newly formed combat units.


A variant of the self-propelled gun based on the HX2 chassis


Following the delivery of these six, FMV will begin delivering the remaining 42 self-propelled guns to the armed forces. The official schedule only specifies a deadline: the entire order must be completed no later than 2030. The exact dates and batches of the remaining vehicles have not yet been announced.

Ebb and flow


Work on the future Archer began long before the current contract. Research into a self-propelled system on a dump truck chassis began in 1995, and the full-scale project began in 2006. Collaboration with Norway began in 2008; in March 2010, the Swedish FMV and the Norwegian organization FLO decided on serial production.

The first four units were delivered to FMV in September 2013, and the first vehicle in the production batch was accepted in September 2015. Norway withdrew from the program at the end of 2013. In 2016, the Swedish government proposed purchasing an additional 24 self-propelled guns for its own armed forces, previously intended for a Norwegian customer. The last of the 48 units in the previous program was delivered to FMV in November 2022.


The first self-propelled guns of the new modification, August 2026.


The Swedish Army used the second batch of Archers to re-equip its combat units, while placing some of the older vehicles into storage. Plans were made to return them to service if necessary.

By October 2025, the FMV had completed the upgrade of 24 Archer 6×6 vehicles and announced that the entire fleet of this modification had been upgraded to Version C. However, if we subtract the 14 vehicles sold to the UK and the eight transferred to Ukraine from the previous 48, the total number is 26. The status of two more systems is unclear in the official publications reviewed. Furthermore, publicly available documents do not allow us to confirm that each of the 24 upgraded vehicles is technically combat-ready on a specific date.

In March 2023, the United Kingdom agreed to purchase 14 Archers. The first vehicle was delivered by Sweden in September of that year; FMV then began the sequential delivery of the remaining 13 systems.



Sweden transferred another eight self-propelled guns to Ukraine; by mid-November 2023, they were already in the recipient's possession. There is no reliable, open, individual inventory of their subsequent losses available in accessible sources, so the exact number of destroyed and damaged vehicles remains uncertain.

In March 2025, the Swedish government separately authorized FMV to purchase an additional 18 Archers for subsequent delivery to Ukraine. This order is not related to the 48-vehicle program for the Swedish Army and should not be counted toward its future fleet.

In a new look


Previous Swedish Archers were built on the Volvo A30 6×6 articulated chassis; in FMV documents, the base vehicle is designated the A30E. For the new version, a four-axle chassis from Rheinmetall MAN Military Vehicles (RMMV) of the HX2 family was selected. Rheinmetall is supplying the chassis with protected cabs, and BAE Systems Bofors is integrating the gun system.

The transition to the HX2 primarily improves road and operational mobility: the new vehicle reaches 80–90 km/h compared to 50–60 km/h for the dump truck version. The protected cabin improves crew conditions, and the use of the HX2 family, already in service with the Swedish army, facilitates operation and supply. Four axles alone are not enough to claim a clear advantage over the articulated Volvo in off-road capability.



The new self-propelled gun's artillery system is similar to that of the Archer 6×6 and the FH77B field howitzer. It features an automated 155mm gun with a 52-caliber barrel, mounted in a remotely controlled weapon station. The crew prepares the gun for firing and fires it from a protected cabin.

The autoloader feeds the projectile and propellant charge separately. The range depends on the ammunition used: the FMV indicates a range of over 50 km when using the appropriate rounds.

The automated fire control system receives and processes data and controls the weapon station. Shifting to a combat or stowed position takes approximately 20 seconds. According to the FMV, the Archer 8x8 can fire six rounds, leave its firing position, and retreat 500 meters in less than two minutes; the crew remains in the protected cabin during this time. This is the FMV's description of the system's normal operating cycle; it is not an independent assessment of combat effectiveness.

Plans for the future


According to FMV, the current fleet of the previous model includes 24 upgraded Archer 6×6s. After the delivery of the first four Archer 8×8s, the provisional inventory count is 28 vehicles of both models, and after the delivery of two more training systems, 30. The contract then calls for 42 new self-propelled guns to be delivered. This count does not equal the confirmed number of technically ready vehicles and does not include two systems with an unspecified status.

The future outcome depends on the fate of the old vehicles. If all 24 Archer 6x6s are retained and the order for 48 Archer 8x8s is fulfilled, the fleet could reach 72 units—triple the original 24. If the existing units are completely replaced, the 48 new vehicles would double the fleet size. Neither of these options can yet be considered a definitive fleet structure.

The contract expands the fleet of self-propelled guns. The new Archers feature improved road mobility, a protected cabin, and commonality with the HX2 family. However, this does not guarantee a proportional increase in combat effectiveness. The program's outcome will depend on the pace of deliveries, crew training, unit formation, ammunition availability, repairs, and the decision on the Archer 6x6.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    31 August 2026 07: 21
    Archer 8×8 vs. Archer 6×6: Why Sweden is changing the chassis

    I read it carefully and didn't understand why Sweden is changing the chassis...
    what next:
    The new Archers are more different high road mobility, protected cabin and unification with the HX2 family.

    What is "high road mobility"? What kind of characteristic is that? Where did they get that from?
    And how is the MAN chassis better than the VOLVO chassis?
    the topic is not disclosed...
    1. -2
      31 August 2026 10: 22
      Quote: Dedok
      I read it carefully and didn't understand why Sweden is changing the chassis.

      You yourself write below that Archer's mobility is growing.
      The speed is 1.5 times faster, the off-road capability is improved, and the loss of one or even two of the eight wheels is no longer such a big deal. The armored cabin, however, can still catch some shrapnel.

      Overall, the upgrade is useful and understandable. Previously, it was hoped that the long firing range alone would provide good safety for the Archer. But the experience of the SVO showed that it doesn't. They added measures to make it possible to escape faster.

      IMHO, all this is good, but mostly against a weaker opponent. Against a more or less technologically advanced opponent, the Archer is too complex and too expensive. And despite all its advantages, the Archer's survivability isn't much better than the homemade Bogdana. request
      1. +1
        31 August 2026 10: 32
        Below yourself write that mobility is growing Archer.

        I didn't write that...
        I asked where the term "high road mobility" used in the article came from...
        which cannot be measured by anything!
        The speed is one and a half times greater, cross-country ability increases, and the loss of one or even two wheels out of 8 is no longer so scary.
        .
        Look at the basis of the Archer 6x6: it's a series of mining dump trucks used all over the world - from our Arctic Circle to the semi-deserts of Australia...
        They are passable, durable, look at the turning radius of such a chassis...
        There's a lot to write about, but the topic of switching from Volvo to MAN hasn't been fully addressed yet...
        1. 0
          31 August 2026 10: 57
          Quote: Dedok
          What was the Archer 6x6 based on? It's a series of quarry trucks.

          The point is that Archer can't afford to drive slowly and majestically around the quarry like a normal quarry truck.

          Quite the opposite, after striking (sometimes even earlier), every second of hesitation can be the last. A response doesn't wait. Those who delay a bit are dead. request
          1. -1
            31 August 2026 10: 59
            The point is that Archer can't afford to drive slowly and majestically around the quarry like a normal quarry truck.

            You apparently haven't seen him at work...
            and compare it with a 4-axle design on a non-breakable frame...
            1. +1
              31 August 2026 11: 13
              Quote: Dedok
              compare with a 4-axle design on a non-breakable frame...

              Turning radius had to be sacrificed for higher speed and better weight distribution. Without it, for example, it would have been impossible to fit the armored cabin.

              Apparently, the Swedes decided that a 40-ton vehicle traveling at a speed of almost a hundred should move primarily in a straight line. request
              1. -1
                31 August 2026 11: 20
                Apparently the Swedes calculated that a 40-ton vehicle traveling at a speed of almost a hundred should move primarily in a straight line

                They "didn't calculate anything" - the use of the MAN chassis is due to NATO bureaucracy and nothing more, that's what the article should have been about: how bureaucracy solves "its" problems...
                1. +3
                  31 August 2026 11: 27
                  Quote: Dedok
                  They "didn't calculate anything" - the use of the MAN chassis is due to NATO bureaucracy

                  Regarding bureaucracy, you're the judge of course. However, unfortunately, it wasn't just the Swedes who felt this way, suffering from bureaucracy due to joining NATO. sad

                  The 8x8 wheel arrangement was also preferred by:
                  CAESAR (France);
                  2S22 "Bogdana" (Khokhly);
                  RCH 155 (Germany);
                  2S43 "Malva" (Russia);
                  Type 19 (Japan);
                  SH-11 (China).
                  And the list is not complete request
                  1. -1
                    31 August 2026 11: 34
                    The 8x8 wheel arrangement was also preferred by:

                    If you look at the Volvo catalog, they have dump trucks, quarry trucks in this formula...
                    but they mounted the gun on an articulated...
                    Do you think they lack the competence in this matter?
                    1. +1
                      31 August 2026 11: 41
                      Quote: Dedok
                      If you look at the Volvo catalog, they have dump trucks, quarry dump trucks in this formula

                      Volvo doesn't have an 8x8 articulated platform. It does have the Volvo FMX 8x8 Rigid, but it has a rigid frame.

                      It can also be added that all the above-mentioned self-propelled aerial platforms from various countries are also on a rigid frame without articulation, like those on quarry dump trucks. request
                      1. -1
                        31 August 2026 11: 45
                        Volvo doesn't have an 8x8 articulated platform. It does have the Volvo FMX 8x8 Rigid, but it has a rigid frame.

                        I wrote about this, I responded to your 8x8 list
                      2. +1
                        31 August 2026 11: 53
                        Quote: Dedok
                        I didn't write about it

                        So, you're no longer in favor of an articulated platform, but simply feel sorry for Volvo?

                        But there, the difference isn't that great. Plus, Man had a ready-made, widely used, proven solution, specifically a military one. The Volvo FMX 8x8 Rigid, on the other hand, would have required significant modifications.request
                      3. -3
                        31 August 2026 12: 27
                        So, you're no longer in favor of an articulated platform, but simply feel sorry for Volvo?

                        Look at the title of the article, and then write whatever comes into your head.
                  2. 0
                    1 September 2026 11: 11
                    Quote: Netl

                    The 8x8 wheel arrangement was also preferred by:
                    CAESAR (France);

                    More likely, CAESAR (Czech Republic and Denmark) – they ordered a "salad" on the Tatra 8x8 chassis. The French are still holding on to the 6x6.
                    1. -1
                      1 September 2026 11: 21
                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      The French are still holding on to 6x6

                      That's true, but the French aren't motivated by the superior performance of the Arquus 6x6 platform. They're motivated by the desire to be able to airlift their self-propelled artillery units using C-130s and Atlases. And, frankly, to support the former Renault Trucks Defense. request

                      And those customers who do not have the above-mentioned sins choose CAESAR 8x8 Yes
    2. -3
      31 August 2026 12: 23
      MAN is, like, "German quality"! fellow Again, support from a neighbor in the kindergarten.
    3. 0
      31 August 2026 15: 19
      Quote: Dedok
      And how is the MAN chassis better than the VOLVO chassis?
      the topic is not disclosed...

      I simply built a version for European roads, a car for export. And we bought it ourselves for advertising.
      1. -1
        31 August 2026 15: 38
        I just built a version for European roads, a car for export.

        It's just different: becoming a supplier of military products to NATO is an even more difficult task than ours...
        and the Swedes just joined NATO and who will give them this piece of the pie?
        For themselves, they will continue to operate the released vehicles, but in training exercises with others, they will only use what is "approved"...
        1. -1
          1 September 2026 08: 35
          Quote: Dedok
          It's just different: becoming a supplier of military products to NATO is an even more difficult task than ours...

          Besides NATO, there's the entire world. Do NATO countries themselves have anything similar in terms of performance characteristics? That's the answer.
          1. 0
            1 September 2026 08: 47
            Besides NATO there is the whole world.

            So they're going to the outskirts, what's the question?
            The only issue is the bureaucracy that is preventing us from fighting, and this case with the Swedes is indicative.
  2. 0
    31 August 2026 13: 51
    The first Archer could only operate on paved roads, and even then, on 47 percent of them, it couldn't even turn around to make a run for it. The new Archer is even worse in this regard; look at its tires; it's clearly only suitable for hardwood. They should have mounted the weapon on their Volvo articulated harvester/logger.
  3. +1
    31 August 2026 20: 10
    It is an automated 155mm gun with a 52-caliber barrel, mounted in a remotely controlled combat module.
    Why isn't this made as a trailer, so that if the vehicle breaks down, the weapon can be attached to another one?
  4. -1
    1 September 2026 11: 08
    Heh-heh-heh... I remember how they fiercely criticized the Malva for its special 8x8 chassis—like, it's long, heavy, and unwieldy, while the Swedes have a civilian 6x6 chassis—and it's fine. So what? The new Archers were ordered on an 8x8 chassis. smile