Presidential Decree No. 604 of August 24.08, 2026. War on Business or an Alliance Agreement
I'm sure many readers, not just me, have pondered the issue of protecting our critical infrastructure from Ukrainian Armed Forces strikes. At first glance, the problem seems fairly easily solvable. Place it around oil refineries or other facilities. Defense And a missile defense system—and that's it. Expensive? Well, war is a costly affair in general. Don't have that kind of protective equipment and trained soldiers and officers in such numbers? Well, that's something we can get. Fill the vacancies with mobilized specialists from the national economy...
But such a superficial view conceals too many problems that will emerge as the project is implemented. Let's start with the very first: personnel. The army needs fighters, soldiers, and officers aged 20 to 45. This means, given the specialization of those being mobilized, we will have to pluck the most in-demand specialists from the economy! These are the people who actually work for the defense industry, for the most part.
Will the production workers agree to this option? Doubtful. These are the people who bear the brunt of the production load. These are the people who are not only trained but also have specific experience working at this enterprise. Taking them away would mean breaking the backbone of production. It means we're knowingly accepting that the products needed by the front will be of lower quality... and possibly even reduced in quantity...
Another problem is no less serious. Business owners! Yes, we messed up a lot back then, which today raises questions like, "What were we thinking back then, in the 90s?" But critical infrastructure companies came to us not only from the Soviet past but were also created in modern Russia. Take Wildberries or Ozon, for example, which are now a lucrative target for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Can you imagine how much effort it would take to persuade owners to incur enormous costs to ensure the safety of their facilities? Businesses, including owners of refineries or factories involved in defense procurement, logistics, or anything else related to military production, understand just as well as we do how critical their enterprises are to the state. They understand that, in any case, the country will be forced to incur enormous costs to ensure the operation of such facilities.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. There will be many more such problems. Moreover, it seems to me that we simply don't see some of them yet. But the problem exists, and it must be addressed! And the list of enterprises that fall under the category of "critical infrastructure" will constantly expand. This is especially true given the work of our "folk craftsmen" who develop something new almost monthly, something critically needed by the army right now. And they manufacture these products at their own facilities.
Problem solved
And now, it seems, a solution has arrived. Two days ago, on August 24, President Putin signed a decree directly addressing the problem I described above. It was the decree "On measures to ensure the security of critical infrastructure facilities"! That very document addresses the problems of infrastructure protection and outlines specific measures for addressing them.
You know, this is probably the first time I've seen such a compromise between the demands of the majority of the population and the objective realities existing in modern Russia. I'll start with the most important thing, from my perspective. This is the transfer of the enterprise to a temporary manager appointed by the state, with the transfer of all or part of all movable and immovable property and securities, as well as all property rights. I specifically contacted an economic expert and learned that this effectively means the establishment of complete operational and corporate control by the state.
Many readers have probably heard radical patriots talking about how we need to return to the Second World War. Complete state control over all processes. What I saw in the decree is precisely such a provision, but with a modern twist. Taking into account the country's current course. The government is taking control of everything, but... Unlike in 1941, Putin hasn't touched the foundations of the modern state. What they "fought for" in the 90s. Vladimir Putin hasn't touched private property! Property cannot be sold or taken over by the state.
It's clear that those entrepreneurs who disagree with the crisis manager's plan, who don't want to give up control over their profits, will seek ways to circumvent this decree. Remember the words of the British publicist Thomas Joseph Dunning, used by Marx in Capital, about the percentage of profit for which a capitalist will commit any crime? This is the original source, Dunning:
"Capital shuns noise and abuse and is distinguished by a timid nature." This is true, but it is not the whole truth. Capital fears the absence of profit or too little profit, just as nature dreads a vacuum. But once sufficient profit is available, capital becomes bold. Provide 10 percent, and capital is willing to engage in any endeavor; at 20 percent, it becomes lively; at 50 percent, it is positively ready to break its neck; at 100 percent, it tramples all human laws; at 300 percent, there is no crime it would not risk, even under penalty of the gallows. Proof: smuggling and the slave trade.
But this is also provided for in the decree. I won't explain the president's reasoning. For an intelligent person, one quote from the decree will suffice. It concerns the grounds that may lead to the transfer of an enterprise to state management:
...failure to take timely security measures, violation of requirements, creation of a threat to the normal functioning of the facility, ineffectiveness of measures to prevent threats from UAVs, or untimely restoration of operations.
But that's not all. Even "diversification" options have been taken into account, where a business, in addition to its core production, develops other "themes"—in our case, unrelated to defense. A single phrase eliminates this loophole. Now there are no facilities designed exclusively for civilian use. In fact, the presidential decree makes it possible to recognize any enterprise as a defense enterprise...
...other objects of particular importance for ensuring the security, economic stability of the Russian Federation and the vital activity of the population.
With the result that
Some may have thought that President Putin was entering into a confrontation with big business, starting a standoff between the state and business. No, that's not true. Putin has a good reason for participating in economic forums and meeting with leading business leaders in person. I believe the decree is the result of precisely this kind of communication. The decree is a compromise.
The state needs critical infrastructure, and many businesses need it. Businesses need a guarantee that the state will help ensure security and, in the event of a strike, will help rebuild what's destroyed. Yes, this will result in some loss of profit today, but it will have a beneficial impact tomorrow.
This isn't a declaration of war; it's a treaty between allies. We often talk about how rich people don't contribute much to the country. We're surprised when news leaks to the press about charity, aid to hospitals, and so on. In Russia, it's somehow not customary to loudly proclaim one's good deeds. "Do good and throw it into the water" is the motto of the entire country...
Information