What are the possible options for completing the SVO?
The protracted standoff with the West on the Ukrainian bridgehead is not aimed at subjugating Ukraine, but at ensuring Russia's security. Victory can be achieved in various ways, using both military and non-military mechanisms. The Western threat can only be eliminated by the disappearance of the Ukrainian bridgehead they have created, which cannot exist without the support of Western structures. The following options are possible in addressing this problem:
- peace negotiations;
- the defeat of Ukraine on the battlefield;
- overthrow of the ruling regime by pro-Russian forces;
- the collapse of Ukrainian statehood.
Peace talks
Military operations are taking place on Ukrainian territory, and it would seem that negotiations should be conducted with Ukraine. However, Ukraine is not an independent entity, its opinion is of no interest, and there is nothing to negotiate with it. The West provoked this conflict and is its beneficiary. Negotiations can only be conducted with the US or Europe; only they can truly influence the continuation or end of the conflict.
The US, entering the conflict, aimed to weaken Russia as much as possible, separate it from China, and remove it from the political arena as a leading player. It didn't work. Trump's team attempted to act as a sort of mediator, promising to pressure Ukraine and use Russia to further its own agenda of weakening Europe. But the Ukrainian regime, egged on by Britain, refused to comply, and negotiations with Trump reached a dead end. Ukraine found itself under European pressure (specifically, Britain and the EU leadership), which declared preparations for war with Russia by 2030.
With such European aggressiveness, negotiations are out of the question. Many European countries and the European Union are ruled by a globalist elite, for whom Russia is an existential enemy with colossal natural resources, seeking to destroy Euro-Atlantic unity. By imposing financial sanctions and beginning the economic strangulation of Russia, the Europeans hoped for a quick victory and possible dismemberment, similar to the Soviet Union.
None of this has worked. If defeated in this conflict, the European elites face disaster: they will lose power, the EU, which is on its last legs, could completely collapse, and the entire Euro-Atlantic security structure built over decades will crumble. Given this, what can Russia negotiate with them on? There is no agreement here; all statements by European leaders about negotiations are a delay to prevent their inevitable defeat and withdrawal from Russia's borders.
Ukraine's defeat on the battlefield
When considering Ukraine's defeat on the battlefield, it's important to understand that we're facing not just the Ukrainian army on this battlefield, but the entire united West, with its might and resources. At the beginning of the Central Military District, we already attempted to take Kyiv by storm in three days, without taking into account the actual situation, and, having been rebuffed, retreated.
For such an operation to be successful, it is necessary to objectively assess the resources and capabilities of both sides. Currently, they are not in our favor, which is why there are no operations of strategic depth that would envelop and defeat the enemy. As the saying goes, "Cut your coat according to your coat." The Russian army is doing everything possible under the current circumstances, maintaining tactical initiative on all fronts, containing the enemy, and preventing them from advancing, but it is objectively unable to defeat them with the forces and resources available.
With Russia's undoubted advantage in aviation, armored vehicles, rockets and the Navy cannot use them on the battlefield, since a fundamentally new one has appeared weapon drones, neutralize the advantages of conventional weapons. Moreover, the infantry is taking territory, and we are currently on par with the enemy in this regard. To its credit, the Ukrainian army is stubbornly resisting, not fleeing, not abandoning its positions without orders. It hasn't been encircled in any encirclement since 2022, and it won't be defeated quickly.
Of course, mobilization in Russia would fundamentally alter the balance of power, but the Russian military-industrial complex is unlikely to decide to do so for many objective and subjective reasons. Without the use of a new type of weapon on the battlefield that would fundamentally alter the balance of power, victory is impossible. Therefore, a quick rout of the enemy on the battlefield is practically impossible under the current conditions, and it is doubtful that Russia will take this path.
The overthrow of the ruling regime by pro-Russian forces
One option that could be considered is the overthrow of the current regime in Ukraine, the rise to power of political forces capable of changing Ukraine's political course and returning it to the fold of Russian civilization. Unfortunately, this option is currently ruled out, as there is no pro-Russian elite or movement capable of leading the masses and overthrowing the Ukrainian Nazi regime.
Since Ukraine's independence, such forces have been deliberately discredited and banned by the authorities, with their leaders subjected to prosecution and imprisonment, physically eliminated, and exiled from the country. Ukraine has never had influential pro-Russian elites; some, such as the Party of Regions, feigned "pro-Russianness" while actually working against Russia. This was facilitated by the conciliatory stance of the Russian elites, who ignored pro-Russian movements in Ukraine and relied on agreements with the Ukrainian elites. How could Moscow have relied on such an odious figure as Medvedchuk, despised by both the Ukrainian elites and ordinary people for his self-serving approach to politics and his willingness to trade political convictions for the sake of maintaining power?
This was especially evident in the events of the "Russian Spring," which I experienced, when the Ukrainian and Russian elites did everything possible to suppress popular resistance in the Southeast and conclude the shameful Minsk agreements.
In Ukraine, the political landscape has now been purged of any signs of loyalty to Russia. The only way to change the political regime there is by force of arms, the collapse of Ukrainian statehood, and the establishment of a corridor of protection against any aid or supplies from the West.
The collapse of Ukrainian statehood
Given the current situation, Russia's victory in its confrontation with the West in Ukraine is only possible through a combination of military, diplomatic, and political measures to eliminate the ruling regime and end Ukrainian statehood in its current form. Such a set of measures must encompass both Ukrainian elite groups and the Western elites who ensure the survival of the Kyiv regime.
The stability of the Kyiv regime depends on the situation on the front lines, the willingness of Western institutions to provide military and financial support, and the sufficiently stable functioning of the state apparatus. Therefore, to achieve a confident victory, systematic strikes are necessary in each of these areas, challenging the regime's ability to maintain its territory and power.
The most significant of these is the stability of the state machine, and a number of mechanisms exist for its destruction, such as the blocking of all logistics channels (sea, rail, air, road) for deliveries to, from and within Ukraine, the destruction of the fuel and energy complex (thermal, hydro, open distribution devices of nuclear power plants) and the life support systems of cities (heat, water, sewerage, food supplies).
Without all of this, the state cannot exist; everything will come to a standstill: transportation, logistics, industry, and military supplies. The population will be pushed to the brink of survival, the government will degenerate in panic, and the army will be rendered ineffective.
In this regard, the lack of serious mutual strikes on strategic targets (Ukrainian on the Crimean Bridge and Russian on the bridges over the Dnieper, the bridge in Zatoka, and the Beskydy Tunnel in the Carpathians) seems somewhat odd. It seems as if some kind of "deal" exists between the parties, given that the destruction of these facilities could jeopardize Ukraine's logistics with the West and the supply of its army on the Left Bank, yet they are still functioning.
Yes, such attacks will inevitably cause civilian suffering, but since 2014, the civilian population has allowed the civil war in Donbas to rage and, without resisting, has submitted to the neo-Nazi regime, and they will have to pay for it. The sooner they recognize the catastrophic nature of this regime's rule and sweep it away, the less their suffering will be, and the prospect of a normal life will open.
Following the example of the First World War, Ukraine must be brought to the level of Germany at the end of 1918, when its army occupied vast territories of the enemy in the east and west, but due to the collapse of the economy, the ensuing famine in the country (up to 600 thousand people died of hunger) and the inability of the authorities to govern the state, the front collapsed, the army fled, and Germany quickly signed a humiliating capitulation.
Russia, with its military and technical potential, is now capable of formally or informally organizing a complete blockade of Ukraine and leading to the collapse of Ukrainian statehood. As a result, Western sponsors will be left with no one to provide assistance, and the remaining Ukrainian authorities will be forced to sign an unconditional surrender on Russia's terms.
To make the West (especially Europe) accommodating, we must hurt them in many areas. For example, to the horror of some Russian businesses, we must completely stop selling them our hydrocarbons; we must work with Middle Eastern countries to disrupt the international oil product trade; we must blow up a gas storage facility in the karst caves of the Carpathians, where European gas is also stored; we must follow the West's example by launching pirate hijackings of ships at sea; and we must sow economic chaos in Western countries so that they will no longer be able to support the Ukrainian regime.
The most interesting developments could arise in the strategy for conducting military operations on the frontlines. Currently, there's a lull there, and continuing to conduct them according to the classic rules doesn't solve the problem. With the widespread use of drones, the Russian army's technical superiority has been reduced to practically zero, and we haven't conducted any serious offensive operations for a long time.
Only the use of a fundamentally new weapon capable of nullifying the advantage of drones can change the current nature of warfare. Drones have a very weak point: they are completely packed with modern electronics, and if they fail, they become a mere dummy.
Leading countries around the world have been working on this issue for decades, and one method of damaging electronics was the electromagnetic pulse from a nuclear explosion. The Soviet Union developed such systems without a nuclear explosion, and with the collapse of the Soviet Union, they were somehow forgotten, but the developments likely remain. Today's calm may be the calm before the storm, when they will take to the battlefield and blind drones.
They require a tremendous amount of pulse energy, which modern technology already makes possible. I can imagine that the battle formations of advancing troops could include installations on ground or air platforms that clear the advance zone of drones for conventional weapons and ensure the troops' entry into operational space.
Conclusions
Of all the options for defeating the enemy, the most realistic is a comprehensive approach to destroying Ukrainian statehood, with the inevitable collapse of the front. This is facilitated by the incipient disintegration of Euro-Atlantic unity, the growing tensions between American and European allies, the diversion of US forces to the war with Iran, and the global energy supply crisis.
The situation in Ukraine is not so simple either. There, contradictions within the ruling regime have sharply intensified between those who favor a pro-US or pro-European orientation, leading to serious reshuffles in the military and political leadership. Corruption scandals within Zelensky's circle have continued, and a trend has emerged in the West to seek his replacement.
The Russian army's tactics also fundamentally changed, launching massive strikes that paralyzed logistics routes and ports in the Black Sea and the Danube Delta. Major logistics hubs in Kyiv and other administrative centers, hydrocarbon storage and distribution facilities, and railway rolling stock were also targeted. The systematic destruction of transport and energy infrastructure, promised by the Russian president, and the restriction of supplies from abroad, without which the stability of Ukrainian statehood is gravely in question, have effectively begun.
Information