The Rise of the Zoomers, or What's So Wrong with Russia's "Kolobok"

8 862 103
The Rise of the Zoomers, or What's So Wrong with Russia's "Kolobok"


The Bun of Discord


"I haven't seen it and I don't judge"—that's roughly how one could describe the release of the family film "The Last Knight: Kolobok" in Russian cinemas. Children seem to like it, and questions about the film's content's compliance with traditional values ​​can be directed to the relevant regulatory authorities. All other things being equal, the film would have remained just another "cinema masterpiece," after which no trace or memory remains. But the organizers of the Russian film distribution corrected everything. The fact is that the release of "Kolobok" was synchronized with the latest Hollywood flick, "Spider-Man: New Day." To avoid direct competition with the American action film, it was decided to push the Spider-Man movie back a couple of weeks. And then it all began.




The rating for "Kolobok" is completely unfairly low. Source: www.kinopoisk.ru

I have several questions. First, about issuing a distribution certificate to an American film. I don't want to sound like a prude or a demagogue, but the official release of "Spider-Man" in 2026 seems ridiculous. Especially when the music for this "masterpiece" was written by Monetochka, a foreign agent sentenced to prison in Russia. This is largely why the youth are so hysterical. Even though the foreign agent was cut from the Russian version of "Spidey," the Russophobe will still get the money from the box office. It's clear that movie theaters don't have much money to make right now, but some limits to freedom of expression must exist.

The second question is: have the organizers of "Kolobok"'s release heard of the Streisand effect? ​​It's when forbidden fruit is especially sweet. It's one thing to deny "Spider-Man" a release, letting it be watched under the table with a poor translation, but quite another to postpone it for the sake of "Kolobok"'s box office. Zoomers, of course, didn't forgive this and staged an online revolt. After all, the Russian film was aimed at families and young people. Outraged by this "injustice," audiences began to massively lower ratings on key online platforms.


Only a miracle will help recoup the cost of "Kolobok." Source: www.kinopoisk.ru

At the height of the scandal, it stood at 1,6 on a 10-point scale, tantamount to a disaster. The overwhelming majority of voters hadn't seen the film and were deliberately lowering the rating in retaliation for the postponement of "Spider-Man." As a result, "Kolobok" only grossed 245 million rubles in its opening weekend, with a total cost of one billion rubles. Whether the film will even break even is a big question. Incidentally, the Cinema Fund allocated 370 million rubles for the filming. "Spider-Man" is in full swing, and it's sure to outsell its Russian counterpart.

Learning from our own mistakes


When powerful administrative resources are at hand, it seems that not everyone engages in critical thinking. And critical thinking requires considerable mental effort. Although in the case of "Kolobok," everything was transparent and predictable from the start. Under no circumstances should "Spider-Man," so eagerly awaited by the Zoomer crowd, have been cancelled. It would have been better to have kept it out of theaters altogether. Society, and young people in particular, are, to put it mildly, irritated by the restrictive rhetoric. Especially in the media space.

On the one hand, platforms broadcasting anti-Russian views should be isolated. But none of them are completely closed—Russians use them quite regularly, using the notorious tunnels. On the other hand, all pro-Russian opinion leaders are automatically removed from banned resources, leaving the vacuum filled by enemies. The latter actively fuel the agenda, stimulating irritation, especially among young people, the most passionate segment of the population. As with the "Kolobok" example, this energy was released on popular platforms. Zoomers were outraged not only by the fact of the transfer, but by the purpose of it—a fairy tale with a clearly pro-Russian context.

In the global film industry, rescheduling a film's release is a common and routine occurrence. If a thriller costing a couple hundred million dollars is synchronized with a similarly budgeted blockbuster, one side typically cedes priority without unnecessary drama. After the hype from the big premiere dies down and the box office revenue subsides, one can promote one's own product—and reap quite a substantial profit in the process. Why exactly the producers of this Russian fairy tale chose not to do so is completely unclear. It seems logic is nonexistent.

September 1st is just around the corner, and it would be possible to elegantly time "Kolobok" for family entertainment on the eve of the new school year—perhaps the audience would be more appreciative, and the box office would be smoother. But now, many exalted representatives of Generation Z and "alpha" will refuse tickets to the "comedy about the most charismatic resident of Belogorye" on principle—they'll... history They've already remembered it and won't forgive it. Of course, parents won't go to the cinema alone to see a children's fairy tale either: a family outing is either a family outing or nothing at all. Thus, the target audience was cut off from both sides.


Source: smotrim.ru

The passive-aggressive reaction of the "Kolobok" creators on social media was also alarming. Director Anton Maslov and actor Dmitry Zhuravlev faced considerable criticism on social media from anonymous users. It even led to a criminal case under the article "murder threats." It's unclear exactly what the creators were threatened with, but State Duma deputy Vladislav Davankov put it very aptly:

Criminal charges have been filed against those who sent nasty private messages to the director of our "children's horror film." Hate always follows any major premiere. And if we were to open a case for every anonymous message, we'd simply run out of people. No one justifies threats, but they have to be credible for a criminal case to be brought.

Furthermore, the creators and cast regularly clashed with Spider-Man fans, which, needless to say, didn't reflect well on either side. Publicly feeding trolls their frustrations is the last thing they should do. The main question is: to what extent has the controversy surrounding Kolobok diminished young audiences' loyalty to Russian cinema in general and Anton Maslov's work in particular?

One can only hope that this revealing story will serve as a valuable lesson for domestic film producers and cultural officials, rather than another excuse to tighten prohibitive mechanisms. After all, administrative resources aren't a one-size-fits-all weapon, especially when the love and loyalty of one's own audience is at stake.
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 32
    24 August 2026 04: 13
    One poster was enough for me to realize this wasn't exactly a family movie; the raunchy face of the gingerbread man alone is enough to convince me. If I had kids, we'd do anything to avoid seeing a movie like this. For some reason, I think, in the best traditions of our cinema, it'll be a ton of obscenity, modern KVN humor, mixed with the unfunnyest fun-loving jokes. All of this with a forced plot, and dressed up as a summer hit. Although, honestly, I wouldn't even go to see Spider-Man. But our modern cinema is somehow soulless, superficial, lacking motivation, and ultimately leaves a nasty aftertaste. You might as well try to boost amateur performances in a workshop and stage a production of The Turnip in one shift. When no one understands why, but it's necessary, and the whole workshop is pulling a lathe disguised as a turnip...
    1. + 15
      24 August 2026 05: 10
      Quote from turembo
      The kolobok's obscene face alone is worth something
      I laughed for a long time until I went hoarse! laughing
      1. + 17
        24 August 2026 11: 28
        Moreover, the author did not put this “kolobok” in the first image and in close-up, but put a child’s drawing laughing

        Next. The author asks about distribution licenses. As far as I know, Spider-Man is being shown unofficially here. Why? Because there are official sanctions, but people want to see new international releases, and cinemas want to stay open.

        Next. In 2004, another Spider-Man was released alongside our Night Watch. And Night Watch grossed more at our box office. And there was no need to anger people by postponing it.

        You know, I don't follow new releases, I don't even really watch movies, and I learned about both films precisely because of this scandal. And I'm completely on the people's side. I'm tired of this madness of prohibition, these administrative interventions, blockings, and so on. Especially now, they're useless. You don't even need samizdat—a flash drive or email will do. And did censorship save the USSR? On the contrary, it created the conditions for the corruption of the elite—why do anything if no one will know about your mistakes? The author writes about "zoomers," but it's not only young people who understand that such a policy will lead to nothing good.
    2. + 12
      24 August 2026 06: 24
      One poster was enough for me to understand that this is not a particularly family film; the obscene face of the gingerbread man alone is worth something.
      Lucky me. I even saw a teaser, right in my face...
      crying
      In general, Stirlitz was watched as a family evening film. good in color, with comments and all the jokes good about Stirlitz from the head hi families...
      P.S. If the state has 250 million for "this creation," then it already has enough for everything else...
    3. -3
      24 August 2026 06: 48
      As far as I remember the events of the last 30-odd years of the modern history of the Russian state, after the 90s, TV channels and movie theaters with a mass of cassettes and discs in the markets were filled with examples of the culture of the pseudo-Western.
      At the same time, tobacco and alcohol advertising was being broadcast on all channels and media outlets. I suspect that officials, including State Duma deputies, were in on the act. Only recently, after the impact of these harmful vices on young people, have laws been passed banning them.
      When a country lacks a clear program for raising a generation in the spirit of inheriting historical traditions, and most decisions are made by bureaucrats for the purpose of profit and cash grabs, one cannot expect positive results.
      1. +5
        24 August 2026 16: 51
        Quote: ZovSailor
        only recently belay belay belay After the impact of harmful vices on young people, laws began to be passed to prohibit them.

        Alcohol advertising has been restricted for 20 years now. feel years - Federal Law of 13.03.2006 No. 38-FZ "On Advertising".
        Cigarette advertising is banned to a slightly lesser extent, as of February 2013, under Federal Law No. 15.

        Quote: ZovSailor
        and in most cases, decisions are made by officials for the purpose of making a profit and mastering the money,

        If that were the case, these two laws would not have been passed, and you would be regularly watching booze commercials.
    4. +5
      24 August 2026 11: 04
      Yes, everything was done correctly, it seems... The scandal was blown out of proportion, Jesuitically, from BOTH sides, as is the classic case. But about the DUMMY, "whether it's a drum or not" - it is just that - a dumb thing. They are incapable empty authors To create "immortal works," especially in Rus'. The wisdom and talent of buffoonery in the presence of "dead souls" are fruitless.
      1. +2
        24 August 2026 16: 55
        Quote: Bayun
        But about a DUMMY, "whether a drum or not"—a dumb thing it is. Dumby authors are incapable of creating "imperishable works," especially in Rus'. Wits and talent for buffoonery are fruitless in the presence of "dead souls."

        Can you name even a hundred Soviet films right now—without the internet? Not classics or powerful ones—just films?
        In the USSR, up to 200 belay paintings a year, but they remember a maximum of 30-50.
        And where is it - the "imperishable"??
        1. 0
          25 August 2026 14: 30
          Inspired by: Will you answer 100 easy questions or just one difficult one? Let's have one difficult one!

          "How many people died in the USSR during the Great Patriotic War? - 20 million people. - List them all by name? - And that's the SECOND question."

          P.S.: I can name two dozen off the top of my head. I'll have to think about the rest. I think I'll get 50.
    5. 0
      27 August 2026 10: 08
      A good family film, for example, is the virtually unknown "Happiness in an Envelope." Okay, my wife was touched, but even I, a big bald guy, was moved to tears. Although I'm very skeptical of our modern cinema, this is a truly warm, heartfelt family film, albeit with a fair amount of drama.
      And all these little koloboks-slaves are just cinematic "popcorn" at the level of "I ticked off that I went to the cinema and killed 1,5 hours of time."
      I haven't seen "Kolobok"; the trailer alone made me feel nauseous. It feels like he was based on the well-known Mongol. And don't expect any rudiments of intelligence from projects starring Comedy Club "actors."
    6. 0
      4 September 2026 15: 08
      The film failed not because of the "zoomers" and the like, but because it was a failure from the start. I watched it, but it was just a waste of time...
      "One poster was enough for me to realize this isn't exactly a family movie; the raunchy face of Kolobok alone is worth something." Yes, that face looks like it was copied from Oleg Mongol... When "Little Red Riding Hood" comes out, they'll copy it from Irishka Chika Pika. Degradation.
  2. osp
    + 20
    24 August 2026 04: 22
    In the current circumstances, this kind of "cinema" is just a way to spend money.
    And real culture in Russia's regions is literally dying out. Especially those who work there.
    Librarians, stage workers of cultural centers and clubs, musicians, local actors.
    Including those who teach children this craft. Puppet theaters, for example.
    People there earn salaries at the level of the minimum wage.
    Although this is the real culture that people outside the capitals look at.
    Where children are taken to study and watch performances.
    Where fairy tales and plays are sometimes performed very well.
    Those people who bring culture to the masses really need to improve their situation in society.
    At least financially.
    Start with rural and district librarians.
    From youth theatres.
    And then people work there for years, giving their talent to the audience, and their salaries are 25-30 thousand rubles.
    When billions are spent on useless "Koloboks".
    1. +2
      24 August 2026 07: 03
      Quote from osp
      When billions are spent on useless "Koloboks".

      agree
      Quote from osp
      From youth theatres.

      Quote from osp
      puppet theaters for example.

      To be fair, young people won't go there, even if you pay them 100 rubles a month. It's an outdated format, alas, from the last century. If people do go there, it's mostly in classes, "on command," and not out of desire. And by the way, the salary of the director of the Stavropol Regional Puppet Theater, Elena Lazareva, is 128,945 rubles (according to official reports from the heads of cultural institutions in the region).
    2. +1
      24 August 2026 16: 58
      Quote from osp
      The same puppet theaters, for example.

      Seriously? Kids are turning away from smartphones to look at dolls? Are you stuck in the first half of the 20th century? Only a few kids go there with their parents or as a class, but the kids aren't thrilled—it's too primitive for them.
      1. 0
        27 August 2026 10: 16
        There's a modern private children's puppet theater not far from my home. It's been around for a long time and quite successfully. The problem is that the repertoire and productions of these "budget-funded" organizations are completely out of step with modern standards. For years, they've been "stewing in their own juices," laced with mothballs.

  3. + 17
    24 August 2026 04: 24
    Interestingly, all TV channels are broadcasting old films from the Soviet era.
    Wherever you poke...
    And nobody needs today's fakes.
    1. + 10
      24 August 2026 07: 14
      There are things you can't do – just don't do them. Film and the auto industry are examples – better not to.
      1. -3
        24 August 2026 11: 01
        Quote: novel xnumx
        There are things you can't do – just don't do them. Film and the auto industry are examples – better not to.

        They know how to do it. But not all of them.
        The other day I rewatched "The Crew" with Kozlovsky. "Fire" with Khabensky.
        But there were also "Black Lightning, Metro".
        Besides this, there were some good TV series released - Taiga Romance, Exes, Casanova, Volunteer's Playlist.
    2. +3
      24 August 2026 09: 23
      It's a question of licenses and royalties, I think.
      1. +4
        24 August 2026 12: 11
        In Soviet cinema, money wasn't the primary concern; now it's all about cash, about how much they can gross at the box office. Why are they remaking all those "Spiders" and other "blockbusters"—2, 3, 4, even 8 and 9? They're essentially well-established "brands" that people will buy into, and they'll keep coming back for more. There are so many interesting novels, science fiction, and true-life stories, but they're remaking what will generate the maximum box office revenue with minimal risk. This is degradation.
        1. +1
          24 August 2026 14: 48
          And not just in Russia, mind you. ))) In that sense, criticizing Kolobok for the money isn't even interesting. The movie is "average" in the entire "Last Warrior" franchise, so what's there to discuss?
          1. +1
            25 August 2026 06: 36
            Quote: Arhat109
            what is there to discuss here?
            Like it or not. What's interesting about this "last knight" is how the villains of fairy tales became positive (Koschei, Vodyanoy, Baba Yaga), and the positive ones became negative (Dobrynya, Varvara the Beautiful). Even Ivan himself, originally a false healer, a charlatan "magician," and a "psychic." As they say, times change, and we change with them... Just like in today's reality, who became the people's "benefactor" and who is smeared, yet continues to profit from Soviet achievements.
            1. 0
              25 August 2026 09: 26
              Let's say Koschei isn't a villain in any fairy tale, just as Baba Yaga isn't exactly a villain. Read the Soviet historian Rybakov; he has some writings on the Slavs, with references to Herodotus.
              1. +1
                25 August 2026 09: 28
                Quote: Arhat109
                Well, let's say that Koschei is not a negative character in any fairy tale, just like Baba Yaga
                You know better, I, apparently, by the age of seventy, have forgotten all Russian folk tales.
                1. -1
                  25 August 2026 09: 32
                  Yes, he steals girls, but... he doesn't rape them, he waits for their consent! And also from Rybakov: The root "kashch/koshch" is very ancient, from which the word "purse" comes. Something like that comes to mind. Modern surnames like "Koshevoy" come from "Kashchei." This was the keeper of the treasury in Cossack detachments in the past.
                  So... what's wrong with you? There's a whole series of cartoons featuring fairy-tale characters, where they're presented in the same light, but "differently." It's fantasy, and the conventions of a fantasy world are the foundation of any book. Take Zelazny, for example. Where have you seen travelers between parallel worlds?
                  1. +2
                    25 August 2026 09: 39
                    Quote: Arhat109
                    Modern surnames like Koshevoy come from Kashchei.
                    I hope you're not a "victim of the Unified State Exam"... Koshevoy has no connection to Kashchei; there are only several versions of its origin, linked to various historical and linguistic roots. One of them stems from a nickname associated with the position of koshevoy ataman. In the Zaporizhian Sich, "kosh" was the name for a camp or community, and "koshevoy" was the name for the head of the military command, i.e., the ataman. All the best.
                    1. +2
                      25 August 2026 09: 42
                      That's one theory. I'm not insisting. In any case, Russian fairy tales aren't like the Western horror stories of the Brothers Grimm.
                      1. 0
                        26 August 2026 03: 19
                        The brothers have nothing to do with it (just like Charles Perrault), their horror films are much older, and in general they have no authorship in the original.
                      2. 0
                        28 August 2026 04: 26
                        Tales of Charles Perrault, translated by Nekrasov
                        Publisher's dedication
                        The ending of the fairy tale "Little Red Riding Hood"
                        Doré's illustration for "Tom Thumb"
        2. +2
          24 August 2026 17: 07
          Quote: Per se.
          In Soviet cinema, money was not the most important thing,

          Seriously???? belay belay belay belay
          And I'm wondering why they showed "Disco Dancer" and "Zita and Gita" in the USSR? And they probably showed Lenin in October, yeah, yeah...in India...

          And these are probably all the right films, ideologically sound, yeah...
          And people are drawn to them out of ideological convictions...

          The highest-grossing foreign films in Soviet cinemas in 1980: a list
          The Beast / L'Animal. France, 1977. Directed by Claude Zidi. Released in the USSR in 1980. 41,3 million viewers in the first year of screening.
          Save the Concorde / Concorde Affaire '79. Italy, 1979. Directed by Ruggero Deodato. In the USSR – from October 1980. 33,2 (according to other sources – 24,2 million) viewers in the first year of broadcast.
          The Mystery of the Burgundian Court / The Miracle of the Wolves / Le Miracle des loups / The Conspiracy of the Powerful / La Congiura dei potenti. France–Italy, 1961. Directed by André Hunebelle. Released in the USSR on May 12, 1980. 26,5 million viewers in the first year.

          Capricorn One. USA–UK, 1977. Directed by Peter Hyams. Released in the USSR on August 15, 1980. 24,2 million viewers in its first year.

          Life is Beautiful / La vita è bella. USSR–Italy, 1979. Directed by Grigory Chukhrai. In the USSR – from July 21, 1980. 16,4 million viewers in the first year of broadcast.

          1981
          ABBA / ABBA: The Movie. Australia-Sweden, 1977. Directed by Lasse Hallström. Released in the USSR in 1981. 33,2 million viewers in the first year of broadcast.
          Four-Handed Game / Le Guignolo. Italy, France, 1979. Directed by Georges Lautner. In the USSR – from August 31, 1981. 31,5 million viewers in the first year of showing.
          The Umbrella Prick. France, 1980. Directed by Gérard Oury. Released in the USSR in July 1982. 28,4 million viewers in the first year.
          The Secret of the Honeymoon Hotel / Flesh / Fleisch. Germany, 1979. Directed by Rainer Erler. Released in the USSR in 1981. 20,5 million viewers in the first year of screening.
          China Syndrome. USA, 1978. Directed by James Bridges. Released in the USSR on September 25, 1981.
          Obsession. USA, 1976. Directed by Brian De Palma. Released in the USSR in July 1981.
          The Passage. UK–USA, 1978. Directed by J. Lee Thompson. Released in the USSR on June 26, 1981.
          1. +1
            25 August 2026 06: 23
            Quote: your1970
            Seriously????
            Seriously. You constantly distort and misrepresent. Why? It's as if you're moonlighting online, where anti-Soviet propaganda pays extra. Of course, box office receipts haven't been abolished or ignored, but directing was driven by different concepts; people wanted to create masterpieces, to make their contribution to art. Sergei Bondarchuk and Fyodor Bondarchuk are two completely different things. If you don't want to understand the main point, ripping off what you want to show, that's your business.
            1. 0
              25 August 2026 09: 59
              Quote: Per se.
              It is clear that box office receipts have not been cancelled or ignored.

              Ignored????!!! Anyone who ignored the collection would be showing a movie at a village club in Kolyma.
              The most attended films in cinemas!

              Yesenia
              Yesenia
              Mexico, 1971
              91 400 000
              Pirates of the 20th Century
              USSR, 1979
              87 600 000
              Moscow does not believe in tears
              USSR, 1979
              84 500 000
              Some Like It Hot
              Some Like It Hot
              USA, 1958
              77 900 000
              Black tulip
              Black Tulip, The
              France, Italy, Spain, 1964
              76 700 000
              The Diamond Arm
              USSR, 1968
              76 700 000
              Caucasian Captive, or Shurik's New Adventures
              USSR, 1966
              76 500 000
              Wedding in Malinovka
              USSR, 1967
              74 600 000
              Crew
              USSR, 1979
              71 100 000
              Horseman without a head
              Jinete sin Cabeza, El
              USSR, Cuba, 1973
              68 600 000
              The Magnificent Seven
              Magnificent Seven, The
              USA, 1960
              67 000 000
              More details on Kino-Teatr.RU https://www.kino-teatr.ru/box/history/sov/

              Do you see the ratio? 6/4
              And you can also calculate for yourself how much money the Soviet film brought in, given the average cost of a film in 1970 was 540,000.



              Quote: Per se.
              Sergei Bondarchuk and Fyodor Bondarchuk are two very different things.

              In the USSR, on average, up to 200 films were released per year - Bondarchuk made 9 films during his entire 33-year career.
              And in between his films there were such "shed"ё"vry" like "Die Hard" and "The Bet".

              Can you name more than 10 Soviet directors off the top of your head?Remember?!!
              And at least 150 of them were running around on the set of 200 films.
              Otherwise, "Fedya - eww"... And Fedya, compared to them, is a good, strong director, yeah...

              Quote: Per se.
              Very seriously.
              enrage DOUBLE Standards
              If it was made in the USSR (even if it's feces) - "Oh, how high-quality!!" (C), but if it's made now - "Ugh, how disgusting!" (C). Although both are feces.
              This duality is what really infuriates me.
              1. 0
                25 August 2026 10: 28
                Quote: your1970
                This duality is what really infuriates me.
                No one is saying that all Soviet films are masterpieces. No one is saying that films from capitalist countries were uninteresting. If you don't want to understand this, I repeat, it's a personal matter, what each person likes. All the best.
                1. 0
                  25 August 2026 10: 47
                  Quote: Per se.
                  If you don't want to understand this,

                  You categorically criticize modern films and directors. And you write-
                  Quote: Per se.
                  In Soviet cinema, money was not the most important thing,
                  - And when you find out that money was the number one priority in Soviet cinema, he purses his lips in resentment: "Oh, they accuse the USSR of mercantilism!!!"
              2. 0
                4 September 2026 15: 22
                In Soviet cinema, there was a classification of films into categories (for internal distribution of funds)
                Films were assigned a category (first, second, third, etc.), which determined the size of the production fee for the creators and the possibility of re-release. This also influenced both quantity (hundreds were released per year) and quality (most were amateurish and unsuccessful).
  4. +2
    24 August 2026 05: 30
    When Lebedev-Kumach's song "The Sacred War" was released on the third day of WWII, it spoke volumes about the state of Soviet culture. Take the film "Morozko." There are no special effects. But children are left to ponder how the sleigh moves on its own. Watching a film is one thing. For it to have a positive impact on children is quite another. Competing with "Spiderman" is the last thing anyone would want.
    1. +3
      24 August 2026 06: 46
      Quote: Nikolai Malyugin
      When Lebedev-Kumach's song "The Sacred War" was released on the third day of WWII, it spoke volumes about the state of Soviet culture. Take the film "Morozko." There are no special effects. But children are left to ponder how the sleigh moves on its own. Watching a film is one thing. For it to have a positive impact on children is quite another. Competing with "Spiderman" is the last thing anyone would want.

      On the fourth.
      And yes, I am not against foreign films.
      They have great films and amazing actors. It's just that in the last twenty years they've taken a wrong turn.
    2. +3
      24 August 2026 12: 54
      In the USSR, cartoons and films served primarily an educational function: they showed what was right and what wasn't, what was good and what was bad... We have a real problem with distribution; good films are being made, not many, but they are being made, but they are shown on third-rate channels, unfortunately...
  5. + 10
    24 August 2026 06: 30
    My daughter went to see "Spider" at 9:30 in the morning. The theater was packed. The young people were clapping their hands. We were all really looking forward to the film. No mention of the coin. She was absolutely thrilled with "Spider"; yesterday she was saying she'd go again with the little one.
    1. +1
      25 August 2026 02: 22
      Actually, no one doubted what they were heading towards; over the last 30 years, we've practically arrived. Lights out. We've established what and who we wanted.
  6. 0
    24 August 2026 06: 39
    Only a miracle will help recoup the costs of "Kolobok"
    As of today, Kolobok's box office receipts are 756 million rubles, so it will recoup its costs and even make a little money...
    1. +6
      24 August 2026 07: 16
      Considering that 50 percent of the revenue goes to cinemas, at the current rate it will hardly reach 2 billion to break even.
      1. +4
        24 August 2026 08: 51
        Quote: zelivee
        50 percent of the proceeds go to cinemas

        Yes. And the film budget doesn't include advertising and marketing. So, 1 billion is just production costs, meaning actors' salaries, filming costs, graphics, sound, etc.
        How much more was spent on TV ads, posters in cities, and banners on websites is a mystery. But it's clearly a significant amount.
  7. +1
    24 August 2026 06: 40
    The film "Kolobok" isn't about the classic Russian Kolobok, who left his grandmother and grandfather. It has nothing in common with the fairy tale. My family and I saw it at the cinema a week ago, and we loved it. It's bright, colorful, funny in places, and has a good cast. Yes, it's a bit crude in places, but within reason. For contemporary Russian cinema, the film may not be a mega-achievement, but it's certainly not a failure.
    1. -1
      24 August 2026 09: 22
      I agree. The film is funny and instructive. It makes you take a closer look at your own self-esteem: "You're not who you think you are."
  8. +7
    24 August 2026 06: 49
    The situation with the film "The Last Knight: Kolobok" is that people don't want to be forced into a bad product. It's just that the film was released in the summer, and people can afford to have fun while walking outside as an alternative.
    When Timur Bekmambetov released Night Watch four days after Spider-Man 2 was released in Russia, his film did so well at the box office that if The Last Knight: Kolobok had been as good as Bekmambetov's film, people would have flocked to the cinema.
  9. -3
    24 August 2026 06: 49
    Avengers 5 is coming out in winter, they'll also postpone it for two weeks, for the sake of another "Russian masterpiece"), when the whole world will see it, and we'll have to wait like a human fart!
    1. +1
      24 August 2026 06: 54
      Is The Avengers a masterpiece? I've never seen a single one. I know it's just a bunch of American superheroes in thongs saving the world, as usual...
      1. -1
        24 August 2026 06: 57
        Look, it's not a masterpiece, but it's better than Kolobok.
        1. -2
          24 August 2026 07: 01
          Look


          I do not want.

          Have you seen Kolobok? Or are you just being sociable that I haven't seen it yet, but I'm judging you?
          1. +1
            24 August 2026 07: 07
            I haven't seen Kolobok and I won't, I don't blame him, it's just because of him that Spider-Man was postponed, even though it was a pirated version in theaters) and while the whole world watched and discussed the film, I waited) I hope the Avengers won't be postponed.
            1. -6
              24 August 2026 07: 14
              So you haven't watched it, but it's better than Kolobok??? ))))
              The whole world watched, but you didn't... Horrible! Why suffer so? Consider moving to a civilized country where spider-men are not tolerated))) You'll be on equal terms with the rest of the world)) And watch it sometime and discuss it... In short, your life will not have been wasted.
              1. 0
                24 August 2026 07: 20
                Well, you haven't seen The Avengers either, but you know about American superheroes in thongs.
                1. -5
                  24 August 2026 07: 26
                  I know, although for me this knowledge is absolutely useless. I'd even say it's forced upon me by aggressive advertising. When you open your browser and see a poster of a crowd in thongs staring at you, asking you to subscribe and watch a new movie for degenerates...
                2. +2
                  24 August 2026 09: 20
                  I haven't seen it, but I'm judging it. I did go, and even went specifically because of the scandal. I don't go to movie theaters, I usually wait until I find a free screening.
            2. +1
              24 August 2026 21: 42
              I'm already sick of this Marvel universe, but the Americans know how to laugh at themselves, they made the series The Boys.
      2. 0
        25 August 2026 21: 12
        The name "Avengers" doesn't imply salvation, but revenge. They screw everything up, and then try to fix it. And if they can't fix it, then they take revenge. Standard American practice.
        1. 0
          25 August 2026 21: 29
          It's the same shit, just from the side.
    2. -1
      28 August 2026 04: 41
      when the whole world will watch it, and we will have to wait like a man farts!

      Unbearable suffering, I can't even look at a fart! How terrible to live!
  10. + 11
    24 August 2026 07: 27
    The author is just fire

    The highly anticipated "Spider-Man" movie should never have been pulled from theaters. It would have been better if it hadn't been released in theaters at all. Society, and young people in particular, are, to put it mildly, irritated by the restrictive rhetoric. Especially in the media.

    A curtain
    1. +6
      24 August 2026 10: 08
      The author wants to please both ours and others. It's trending now.
      1. +2
        24 August 2026 10: 33
        And these people teach us how to live.....
    2. +3
      24 August 2026 17: 14
      Quote: Enny
      The author is just fire

      The highly anticipated "Spider-Man" movie should never have been pulled from theaters. It would have been better if it hadn't been released in theaters at all. Society, and young people in particular, are, to put it mildly, irritated by the restrictive rhetoric. Especially in the media.

      A curtain

      Quote: ALARI
      The author wants to please both ours and others. It's trending now.

      That's true - the author was quite torn between "the smart and the beautiful" (c)
  11. +7
    24 August 2026 08: 01
    The fact is that the release of "Kolobok" was synchronized with the latest Hollywood bubblegum movie, "Spider-Man: New Day."
    Isn’t “Kolobok” a movie chewing gum?
    1. -2
      24 August 2026 09: 19
      No, it's not. It has an idea, and one that's very useful not only for children: "You are not who you think you are."
  12. +7
    24 August 2026 08: 38
    Ah, the people who created "Winnie the Pooh", "Karlson", "The Wizard of the Emerald City" and "The Bremen Town Musicians", "The Adventures of Electronics" and "Guest from the Future" are leaving.
    Maybe this is just an old man's grumbling, but it seems to me that since then nothing better or more useful for children has been created.
    Regardless of any budgets, directors and actors.
    But the no-budget "Brother," with its volunteer actors and no price list or briefcase, became a remarkable monument to the 90s: it turns out you can make a timeless classic just like that (not for kids, of course, but even kids over 12 watch without stopping).
    Of course, there shouldn't be any culinary templates in art, including cinema, and there shouldn't be any attempts to break the box office by banning competitors...
    Well, this is AvtoVAZ haute couture.
  13. + 15
    24 August 2026 08: 45
    Kolobok is just a bad movie.
    1. This is an attempt to imitate Hollywood without a Hollywood budget. It turns out bad, stupid, and of low quality.
    2. This isn't a children's film. Characters from vulgar stand-up comedy and comedy club shows don't fit comfortably in a children's film. Kharlamov is excellent as Eduard Surovy; he's a truly funny and original actor, but his audience is adults. The bandit and thief Kolobok, with Kharlamov's face and voice and his toilet-like humor, is nonsense.
    3. The casting is disappointing. They're bad. They underact and overact. These are actors for sketches, 2-3 minute commercials, not full-fledged films and/or theater.
    And the box office figures speak for themselves. Kolobok grossed 750 million rubles ($10 million) in its theatrical run. It'll probably make even more. It definitely won't break even, which didn't stop its creators from announcing the start of filming a second installment. So, the conclusion is that they're making a worthless movie just to squander our budget.
    Spider-Man has grossed $2,3 billion to date. That's the whole story, really.
    1. 0
      24 August 2026 09: 18
      I haven't seen the new movie, and the old ones are complete crap. Just generic bubblegum flicks with no real message.
  14. -2
    24 August 2026 09: 15
    I specifically went and saw this Kolobok. It's a film like any other, and it fully deserves its 6+ rating. There weren't many people in the theater, mostly kids. They laughed fairly regularly and were the last to leave at the end. I honestly don't understand what's wrong. Kolobok is exactly the same as it was before in this franchise, unchanged. There's a divergence from the other Last Knight films, as this is told from the perspective of a secondary character in the franchise, and there are no knights at all, save for a brief episode with Finist. This somewhat undermines expectations, just like in bestsellers like Asprin's "Myth Corporation"—books with secondary characters are much harder to read, as the main character is practically a nobody, and here he's completely absent.
    The actors, the graphics? They're perfectly in keeping with the franchise, everything's spot on. Worse than Hollywood? Well, I wouldn't say so.
    But! Unlike bubblegum movies, this film has a central idea, and it's explained with utmost clarity for ages 6+. In fact, the entire film can be summed up in one phrase: "You are not who you see and feel yourself to be." That gets a special thumbs up from me. Almost Tarkovsky, but without the drag.
    Even here, there are a lot of minuses from those who haven’t watched it but are condemning it, which says a lot.
  15. +1
    24 August 2026 09: 19
    Come on, tighten the screws from all sides, and then it'll explode so hard that this whole swamp will be destroyed! Even the youth have lost their patience, well done, you're doing a great job of creating a positive mood among the people. We're definitely not going to live any better, go ahead, rulers.
  16. +8
    24 August 2026 09: 58
    The Zoomers' protest is that they're tired of the authorities imposing what they deem necessary and banning and restricting what they deem unnecessary. They don't want to live in a time of total censorship and the imposition of mandatory "values."
    1. +7
      24 August 2026 10: 13
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      The Zoomers' protest is that they're tired of the authorities imposing what they deem necessary and banning and restricting what they deem unnecessary. They don't want to live in a time of total censorship and the imposition of mandatory "values."

      To recreate some kind of semblance of the USSR, but without the USSR's advantages and with its limitations—a fantastic idea, of course... predictably "popular" and very "promising"...
    2. 0
      24 August 2026 17: 18
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      The protest of zoomers is that they are tired of the authorities imposing what they consider necessary and prohibiting and limiting what they consider unnecessary.

      That is, a show Its and transfer ALIEN - it's bad in Your versions?
  17. +4
    24 August 2026 10: 18
    Das...
    The obscenely terrible face of the gingerbread man is already frightening...
    A retelling of the plot and the assessments of those who watched it too.

    Americans - the plot isn't that great there either, but at least, based on the retelling, the special effects are tense, and the alien setting of the US at least smooths out the inconsistencies...
    1. 0
      24 August 2026 11: 22
      And behind this bread there is a guy with a rolling pin and a girl who looks like a character from Harry Potter.
      It looks pretty funny.
  18. -2
    24 August 2026 11: 16
    I've noticed that people in countries like Russia, Belarus, and Cuba often still express admiration for the West, while citizens of Western countries increasingly harbor disgust—not so much for their own countries as for their ruling elites—and find China, for example, attractive. In Cuba, those who don't remember the brutality, poverty, and exploitation—or the humiliation of an entire nation turned into a gangster playground—often yearn for openness to the West and, ideally, would like to move permanently to the United States. What they don't realize, however, is that the "American Dream" is already dead—if it ever existed at all (and it didn't last long, even by the standards of the relatively short history of the United States). Years of scarcity and isolation have left their mark on Cuba, and yet the majority of the population still wants to preserve the achievements of socialism—which, of course, is incompatible with capitalism.
  19. 0
    24 August 2026 11: 22
    Regarding the Zoomer revolt that has completely smashed ratings, the problem is far-fetched. People either like a movie and watch it, or vice versa. What these pimply teens imagined is a matter of indifference to the intelligent (c) (that's a real classic).
    1. +2
      24 August 2026 11: 31
      Simple American films often blur into one indistinguishable mass (though, of course, the country has its share of worthy films). But films that many consider boring—for example, the Soviet film "Stalker"—are etched in the memory.
    2. +2
      24 August 2026 17: 22
      Quote: Essex62
      Regarding the Zoomer revolt that has completely smashed ratings, the problem is far-fetched. People either like a movie and watch it, or vice versa. What these pimply teens imagined is a matter of indifference to the intelligent (c) (that's a real classic).

      For the third time, I agree with you – either you watch a movie or you don't. The USSR was full of boring films (like the Georgian "Bet") that no one ever watched and no one bothered to buy an extra ticket...
  20. +3
    24 August 2026 11: 25
    I don't watch modern films on principle, because, regardless of the plot or genre, they're vulgar, stupid, and rude. Film after film, they're not faces, but mugs, with the same "concepts" that constitute their essence. Knowing this essence, there's no need to watch its latest iterations; this "mug" with its "concepts" will manifest itself one way or another. laughing
    1. -1
      24 August 2026 17: 23
      Quote from gribanow.c
      I don't watch modern films on principle, because, regardless of the plot or genre, they're vulgar, stupid, and rude. Film after film, they're not faces, but mugs, with the same "concepts" that constitute their essence. Knowing this essence, there's no need to watch its latest iterations; this "mug" with its "concepts" will manifest itself one way or another. laughing

      Watch the Soviet film "Bet" by Georgiafilm - it's just full of meaning, yeah-yeah...
    2. 0
      26 August 2026 03: 37
      "Territory" by Alexander Melnik, 2014, based on the novel by Oleg Kuvaev.
    3. 0
      28 August 2026 04: 51
      I don't watch modern stuff on principle...

      This is old age, grumbling for the tastes of youth.
  21. +3
    24 August 2026 11: 27
    -Here are 100 tickets to the film "Kolobok", distribute them among the residents of our building. -Huh? -And whoever refuses, we'll turn off their gas! winked
  22. +3
    24 August 2026 11: 40
    In modern cartoons, the horse turns out to be smarter than the hero. Why is that?
    1. 0
      28 August 2026 18: 07
      In modern cartoons, the horse turns out to be smarter than the hero. Why is that?

      N
  23. +5
    24 August 2026 11: 46
    I went to see this piece of trash from the domestic film industry called Kolobok. I went out of principle, out of curiosity, to understand why it's so badly criticized. I'd also recommend the author of this article go see it before writing this article—maybe I wouldn't even bother writing it. I wonder how they managed to spend so much money on this piece of crap? With the low-brow humor present in this "masterpiece," is it really a family film? I won't go see Spider-Man because I only saw the first part and didn't like it.
  24. +2
    24 August 2026 13: 29
    It would be better if it weren't allowed into cinemas at all. Society, and young people in particular, are, to put it mildly, irritated by the prohibitive rhetoric. Especially in the media.

    - I wonder if the author sees any contradiction in his own words?
  25. +1
    24 August 2026 14: 28
    My daughter is 6,5 years old and over the past year I've gone to the cinema with her several times, by the way, only to see domestic films/cartoons:
    Cheburashka 2 is definitely worth the money, yes the graphics are poor but the movie is great, my daughter was delighted, I liked it too.
    Doctor Dinosaur - well, that's an acquired taste. I thought it would be about archeology and excavations, but it turned out to be some kind of wild fantasy about parallel worlds, but the kid liked it.
    The Frog Princess 2 – now that's just pure nonsense, with tired actors, a convoluted plot, and mysticism and magic. Basically, this film should be shown on TV 3 or a special edition for the "most shocking hypotheses."
    Gorynych—well, it's a perfect mix of everything in one film: the best submarine officer in the navy loves to drink and party, and steals someone else's bicycle. He gets into a submarine drunk and ends up in a lost fairytale world where conspirators (I assume they're Germans) plan to poison the local prince, disband his army, and seize the land. Three of us went, and I paid 2000 rubles for it.
    I looked at the Kolobok posters, some video and I realized I won’t go for it, I think the creators don’t need my money, if they did, they would have made a normal film with good graphics and a different plot.
  26. +2
    24 August 2026 15: 23
    Unfortunately, I have to admit that Russian filmmakers don't know how to make films using public funds. Things work better without them. Bekmambetov and "Masha and the Bear" are world-famous (but not only). Moreover, the Ministry of Education itself has acknowledged this: on the list of 100 films required viewing for schoolchildren, there isn't a single one made after 91.
    https://www.rbc.ru/society/29/08/2025/68b1e0b59a79471bdabe5c2a
  27. +2
    24 August 2026 18: 40
    I didn't watch either. I read the article and almost all the comments, and the context is the same: prohibitive policies and the mindless use of administrative resources will indeed lead us to the "end of the USSR."
    Well, it's probably time to put a stop to this money-grabbing in our cinematography. "Panfilov's 28 Men" is a prime example.
    PC. I'll watch "Spider" on the computer later, and probably "Kolobok" too. Maybe.
  28. +1
    24 August 2026 19: 45
    What "kolobok", what "spider"... Who even gives the go-ahead to rent this crap??? fool
    1. 0
      1 September 2026 21: 42
      Quote: 16112014nk
      What "kolobok", what "spider"... Who even gives the go-ahead to rent this crap??? fool

      Cinemas need to make money. Or do you think they buy films out of altruism? In the US, for example, about half of all films released recoup their costs. But we have to consider that there are now plenty of streaming platforms and apps, and people are sitting at home in front of huge screens.
      Yes, and once top actors gradually move into lower-ranking films.
  29. +1
    24 August 2026 20: 15
    I haven't watched it and I won't watch it.
  30. +2
    24 August 2026 20: 46
    As a movie buff, I was completely put off from going to any movie theaters by the really bad sound.
    very often I persuaded myself to watch a movie on the big screen
    I came and got burned every time
    Now I don't go to any at all
    neither a bun nor a spider 😪
  31. +2
    24 August 2026 23: 28
    Gingerbread Man in the hut.
    In general, the news of the last week is some kind of surrealism.
    I watched several reviews about Kolobok, it’s very cool.
    In general, our films are good because Bazhenov reviews them.
    By the way, I recommend watching "The Odyssey". It's a truly powerful film.
    1. 0
      1 September 2026 21: 43
      Quote from Kuziming
      .
      By the way, I recommend watching "The Odyssey". It's a truly powerful film.

      There is no comparison with Troy.
      1. 0
        2 September 2026 06: 19
        Troy has a good picture.
        Everything in the Odyssey is a metaphor. This is not meant to be taken literally.
        For example, Homer as a black rapper.
        But the rapper is, after all, a modern storyteller. That is, the tradition continues in new conditions, and, to some extent, Homer lives on.
        Helen is ugly. That is, Troy was captured not for its feminine beauty, but purely for the straits; they fought over control of the passage fees.
        The viewer is given not food for entertainment, but food for thought.
        This is not filmed for reenactors or teenagers.
        Agamemnon in "space" armor is a metaphor. When he appears against the backdrop of the opening gates, in my opinion, it's truly powerful.
        Well, the special feature - the story of how Odysseus overcame post-traumatic disorder - is generally relevant.
  32. +1
    25 August 2026 11: 53
    For years now, filmmakers have been producing dubious films and cartoons with derivative plots and pushing them through with the help of administrative resources. And often at government expense. So it's all natural.
    1. +2
      26 August 2026 05: 04
      Kolobok isn't really a film about "Kolobok," but about women and their worldview: "You're not who you think you are." Explained for ages 6+... especially for bear-hedgehogs. "Round things should help round things!" )))
  33. +1
    27 August 2026 14: 43
    "KOLOBOK" is the "alpha" and "omega" of contemporary Russian cinema... Sergei Eisenstein, Sergei Gerasimov, Sergei Bondarchuk, Georgy Danelia, Mikhail Romm, Andrei Tarkovsky, Stanislav Rostotsky, Leonid Gaidai – they are "turning over in their graves and choking with shame" for today's Russian cinema... According to today's mass intellect and cinema...
  34. 0
    27 August 2026 14: 51
    Kolobok has a storyline – a bear-hedgehog! It's truly a DAM, in its current form. Irony or a prediction? Time will tell. Overall, Kolobok himself is a bit rough around the edges, especially the voice acting, but special thanks to Kharlamov; the character is compelling, so to speak. My verdict: this isn't a children's film, although everything is within acceptable limits... But the rating is indeed understated, which is why I didn't go to the cinema and see the screening. And now, after watching it, I can see it on the big screen!
    1. +1
      31 August 2026 12: 46
      The rating is artificially low, thanks to various haters. The film is truly "average" for the entire "Last Warrior" franchise, and its rating should be just as "average." The rest is a stretch. However, everyone has their own tastes.