Russian Armed Forces drones struck a large military warehouse near Kyiv.

8 598 27
Russian Armed Forces drones struck a large military warehouse near Kyiv.

The Russian Ministry of Defense reported last night's strikes by Geran-4 Seeker loitering munitions on a major logistics center in the village of Martusovka, near the city of Brovary in the Kyiv region. The Russian military department released objective monitoring footage confirming the missiles' impact. drones warehouse.

The transport and logistics center belongs to the Ukrainian company Zammler Group. It housed military products, including components and parts for the assembly of strike vehicles. drones long-range weapons EW and robotic systems. The State Emergency Service of Ukraine deployed a helicopter to extinguish the large-scale fire.



Additionally, a fuel and lubricants depot in Brovary was attacked, according to the Russian Defense Ministry. The fuel and lubricants depot in Brovary contained approximately eight thousand cubic meters of fuel intended for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Regarding the missile and drone attack on the Ukrainian capital on the night of August 20, the Russian Ministry of Defense reports which specific targets were hit. As Military Review reported this morning, rocket The industrial enterprise Fire Point LLC, which produces components and assembles medium- and long-range attack UAVs, as well as Flamingo cruise missiles, was hit.

During overnight strikes in Kyiv, a warehouse complex belonging to the Ukrspetssystems company, containing components for aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles and finished UAVs, was destroyed. A state-owned enterprise was damaged. aviation Antonov Industries. A warehouse containing M-900 thermobaric bombs, anti-tank mines, and ammunition for Baba Yaga-type UAVs was destroyed.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    20 August 2026 11: 22
    I read the list of hit targets (it would be better if they were destroyed, but we have what we have) with a forgotten “sense of deep satisfaction” laughing
    1. +4
      20 August 2026 12: 59
      It would also be a good idea, if possible, to begin systematically and slowly disposing of the Bandera-Nazi "firefighting" helicopters (and their camps). Otherwise, today they're just dumping buckets on Kyiv. And tomorrow, they'll be evacuating the top Bandera-Nazis fleeing from the territory of the former "Ukraine" to the Poles or the Bucharest Roma. Is that really necessary?
      1. +1
        20 August 2026 13: 08
        I agree, everything should burn to the ground.
  2. -5
    20 August 2026 11: 33
    "One man's war is another man's mother."
    We read Wiki:
    "It consists of 5 companies and 17 offices in Ukraine, Poland, China and Kazakhstan."
    Here you have both "back to back" and a CSTO ally just by chance. belay
    1. + 11
      20 August 2026 11: 40
      Trusting Vicki, who is practically officially under the CIA's control, and then slapping a quote in Russian on top of that. Sarcastically about the allies. You're brilliant. So you trust the enemy implicitly. I see.
      1. +4
        20 August 2026 11: 52
        Quote: Skobaristan
        That is, you trust the enemy unconditionally.

        Disinformation is also information. You need to understand what the enemy is counting on and how they're trying to disguise their actions. Then you'll know where to look for what you need.
        For example, according to the same disinformation from Wikipedia, not a single Ukrainian oil refinery has been operating for over 10 years! What a great hiding place! laughing
        1. +2
          20 August 2026 12: 12
          The father of European tragedy, Aeschylus, said: "In war, truth is the first casualty."
          Sun Tzu: "War is the way of deception."
          1. +1
            20 August 2026 12: 54
            Well, the "path of deception"—that still needs to be asked: who and why? If it's the enemy, then that's understandable. But what about "our own"?

            If I'm not mistaken, Moltke expressed himself more accurately on this subject: "During war, one must tell (one's own) the truth. But... Not the whole truth..."
            1. +2
              20 August 2026 13: 12
              Quote: ABC-schütze
              Moltke, on this subject, expressed himself more accurately: "During war, one must tell (one's own) the truth. But... Not the whole truth..."
              Wise. I didn't expect such an idea from the general. wink
              1. +2
                20 August 2026 14: 10
                Quote: Schneeberg
                Wise. I didn't expect such an idea from the general.

                This is not our general. recourse
            2. 0
              20 August 2026 21: 54
              The devil, as always, is in the details. Who are "our own"? Clearly not the "residents" of this site, or indeed the "general public" who demand the full truth be conveyed. And how much truth is being told to those who are supposed to be told it, we have no way of knowing, and therefore there's no point in speculating on the matter here (of course, my opinion is purely personal, and if someone enjoys "beating water," who's to stop them?).
      2. +3
        20 August 2026 12: 13
        Wiki is the only true source of knowledge for any true liberal! wink
      3. 0
        20 August 2026 21: 19
        The Russian Ozon shareholders are also the mattress minority shareholders of Black Rock and Vanguard—that's why they're not flying in. How about that, robot Fyodor? The owner of WB doesn't have any such respectable shareholders, but she does have a disgruntled ex-husband in Kyiv. :-) And a namesake in North Korea who "doesn't abandon his own." And now, like the rest of the world, they're sending weapons to the Outskirts. However, there's an important nuance. :-)))
        1. 0
          20 August 2026 21: 53
          I'm skeptical of conspiracy theories. That whole "US beneficiaries" thing, so it's a deal and all that. Yes, anything can happen in history, and your version has a right to exist, but nothing more. But I found it interesting to analyze the comment here and now.
  3. +2
    20 August 2026 11: 41
    What kind of bomb is this M-900? I couldn't find any information anywhere.
    1. 0
      20 August 2026 13: 45
      What kind of bomb is this M-900? I couldn't find any information anywhere.

      Indeed. All references to this bomb are exclusively related to this news item from various sources. The closest I found was the MOA-900, but that's a 9 kg fragmentation bomb, just right for Baba Yaga.
  4. +1
    20 August 2026 11: 46
    The fuel and lubricants depot in Brovary contained approximately eight thousand cubic meters of fuel intended for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

    And they said that no one has used the oil depots there for a long time and everyone works on the fly...
  5. 0
    20 August 2026 11: 58
    Quote: Skobaristan
    Trust Vicki, who is now practically officially supervised by the CIA,

    It's perfect for capelin. I rarely use Wikipedia. It's just relevant right now, for me. Entire departments of Ukrainians are sitting there, changing reality.
    Regarding my "magnificence," you're right and have your own opinion, which you undoubtedly have. I've also looked at other sources. I posted it on Moyva because it's supposedly from the original source.
    1. 0
      20 August 2026 15: 15
      I'm curious how you responded. Well, one other detail. So, the main point isn't about the language and the original source, but about your conclusions based on the "original source." The enemy's source of information. You "failed to notice" that again.
  6. -1
    20 August 2026 12: 01
    Quote: Vitaly_pvo
    Disinformation is also information. You need to understand what the enemy is counting on and how they're trying to disguise their actions. Then you'll know where to look for what you need.

    good Yes Thank you!
  7. 0
    20 August 2026 12: 57
    Without a doubt, they got what they deserved today.
  8. 0
    20 August 2026 14: 31
    There's a big mess, a helicopter is flying over Kiev.
  9. -1
    20 August 2026 14: 41
    Why don't you shoot down the fire helicopter? Firstly, the longer it burns, the greater the damage, and it's precisely to inflict maximum damage that a strike is carried out. Secondly, if necessary, with a few simple manipulations, the fire helicopter can be converted into a combat helicopter...
  10. -1
    20 August 2026 15: 31
    Quote: Skobaristan
    So the main idea is not about the language and the original source, but about your conclusions based on the "original source".

    Are you deliberately reading between the lines? I wrote that I read several sources, including a Kazakh one. And I analyzed them. But of course, you have the right to notice something amiss.
    Because of my job, I'm used to listening to what and how even a Krivoy Rog drug addict is drilling without coming to consciousness.
    P.S.: It wasn't me who gave you the minus. I don't like doing that. That's not how I was raised. lol
    1. 0
      21 August 2026 11: 22
      And again, your reply isn't meant as a reply but as a separate message. This is an interesting way of responding. It seems you either deliberately don't use the "reply" button or are incapable of mastering its functionality. But yes, on topic. Once again, the main point of your message is the very conclusion: here you have both "back to back" and a CSTO ally, purely by chance, which can only be interpreted as doubting Russia's friendly countries. And this is based on Wikipedia. You didn't cite any other sources. You only mentioned that they exist. I'm telling you, you have a very interesting manner.
      1. 0
        21 August 2026 13: 58
        Vladimir, hi
        Arguing is a rather thankless task.
        I'm arguing in court and I've had enough of this. It's about my tonsils.
        Whether or not to cite sources is my right, provided I understand the unwritten terms of the internet correctly. And I'm not going to try to prove it or throw around links.
        You're doing great! I'm probably not, since you're accusing me of something here.
        Thank you for your attention.
        I'll stop saying that. hi
        1. 0
          21 August 2026 14: 14
          I wasn't arguing. I was simply recording your remarks, which seemed very curious. Nothing more.