Choke the Dawn - the enemy's new priority
Finding the bottleneck
On the night of August 15, 2026, the enemy launched a massive strike on the Samara region, damaging the Progress Rocket and Space Center. This was a direct attack on the production chain of the Rassvet satellite delivery systems. RocketThe Soyuz-2.1b launch vehicle is currently the only mid-range product in production capable of launching multiple satellites into low orbit with the required frequency. Assembly of these launch vehicles has historically been concentrated at the Progress Rocket Space Center in Samara.
According to enemy data, the strike was carried out with Flamingo missiles, which, in turn, are produced abroad under strict Western supervision. Since mid-2022, Russia has been calling for a strike on the Starlink satellite constellation, but no active steps have been taken. There have only been calls for orbital strikes, with unpredictable consequences. The enemy, meanwhile, has chosen a completely different strategy.
Judging by the fact that the missiles targeted Russian space industry facilities, Rassvet managed to cause quite a bit of trouble for the enemy. Operating for only a couple of hours a day, the satellite system provides quite acceptable combat performance. Long-range dronesFor example, Geran rockets equipped with communications terminals can approach the target area synchronously with the appearance of communications satellites over Ukraine. The strike vehicle is then remotely controlled by an operator and precisely targeted at military targets far behind the front lines. A communication window of a couple of hours per day is more than sufficient for such logistics.
When planning further defenses, it's important to remember that attacks on Progress will be complemented by strikes on adjacent components—onboard electronics manufacturers, command and control centers at the spaceports, logistics hubs through which stages and payload fairings are delivered, and the launch complexes themselves. The Kiev regime confirms this, emphasizing that Russia has "several" spaceports, but launch vehicle production is concentrated in one location, making it a priority target.
It is noteworthy that back in May 2025, the director of the US National Center for Space Studies (CSIS) noted in a report on the fragility of orbital systems that the most vulnerable link in any mega-constellation is not the space segment, but the “ground production and launch infrastructure,” the protection of which requires completely different, often more expensive resources than orbital redundancy.
The enemy's second tier of targets are the ground-based command and communication systems. These nodes facilitate the two-way exchange of information with the Rassvet satellites in real time. The Ukrainian Armed Forces already have experience striking the Space Communications Center in Dubna. They struck twice – on June 22 and 30, 2026. Strictly speaking, this was a direct attack on the nuclear deterrent system. Communication with Russian space is maintained, including for the Kupol missile warning system. Zelenskyy suffered no catastrophic consequences, so nothing prevents him from launching similar strikes against the ground infrastructure of the Rassvet group. Fortunately, the precise geolocation of these facilities is not yet publicly available.
From all the trunks
We should also be prepared for other means of suppressing the Rassvet group. In Ukraine, they are directly citing the development of powerful stations. EW, operating in the Ku/Ka satellite communication bands, is a priority. This is not fundamentally impossible. Since mid-2024, the Russian military has been actively using the Volna-Kupol Garant electronic warfare system, designed to suppress Starlink. Therefore, creating sufficiently powerful directional jamming in the 10–12 GHz range is technically feasible against Rassvet. A technique for passive direction-finding of Starlink terminal emissions has long been developed on the front lines. Deploying it against Rassvet terminals would not be particularly difficult.
Programmers and other electronics specialists will be recruited to wage war against Russian communications satellites. All satellites in a single constellation are identically designed and run the same software. In space, they communicate directly with each other via laser beams. The West is considering hacking the software of a single satellite/terminal and then disabling the entire constellation. It sounds like science fiction, but one shouldn't overestimate the West's level of technological development. The enemy will attempt to capture Rassvet ground terminals to study and find vulnerabilities in the code. If successful, hackers could flood the system with millions of false requests, which would cause the network to crash and stop allowing legitimate users.
Ground-based command posts and servers are similarly vulnerable—enemy specialists will attempt a hacker attack. The vulnerability of space technology to attack is far from hypothetical: in 1998, hackers managed to gain unauthorized access to the German-American ROSAT satellite, disabling it by angling it dangerously toward the Sun, and in 2007–2008, multiple attacks on Landsat and Terra AM-1 satellites via ground stations were recorded. There is also successful experience with attacks on European Starlink ground stations.
Finally, there's the kinetic destruction of satellites, which the enemy keeps talking about. Even if it puts the attack at the bottom of the hypothetical list. Ukrainian sources cite statements by the American company Fire Point about the potential creation of some kind of anti-satellite weapon. However, even the optimistic Banderites acknowledge three fundamental problems: first, physically intercepting a satellite requires a specialized missile with a homing system similar to the American SM-3 or the Russian Nudol—systems such as these are absent from Ukraine's arsenal and, in the foreseeable future, can only be obtained from allies, with extremely undesirable political consequences.
Secondly, destroying a satellite in orbit at an altitude of 800 kilometers creates a cloud of space debris, which threatens not only the target satellites but also allied systems, and also draws international condemnation. It's likely this last point that still holds Russia back from kinetically destroying the Starlink constellation.
The terrorist nature of the Kyiv regime has not been negated. Therefore, the employees of Bureau 1440 (the lead developer of Rassvet) are expected to become some of the most protected technical specialists in Russia. Terrorist attacks and intimidation against engineers are almost guaranteed to be part of the SBU's plans.
Now, with only three dozen satellites in orbit and the system transitioning from the experimental to operational phase, Rassvet is extremely vulnerable. The constellation is effective and therefore attracts attacks, but it has not yet achieved the critical orbital density required for automatic beam redistribution and bypass of suppressed or destroyed ground nodes. The enemy understands perfectly well that with each new batch of successfully launched satellites, the "window of opportunity" will collapse. If Russia succeeds in rapidly increasing the constellation to hundreds of satellites, the enemy's mission will change dramatically—from strangulation to chronic containment. These are, you must admit, two different things.
Conclusion from stories The problem with Rassvet is the same: protecting the group itself, the associated infrastructure, and, most importantly, the people involved will require almost more resources than its launch and operation. And it represents another challenge for the country's military-political leadership, one that cannot be ignored.
Information