The port is at a standstill, but the barn is getting cheaper: what happened to the Novorossiysk shutdown
On the night of August 12 Drones The Novorossiysk port infrastructure was hit. Following the attack, the Novorossiysk Grain Terminal and the Novorossiysk Grain Terminal (NKhP) shut down, with operators reporting damage. On August 13, the largest of the three, the KSK, ceased operations; according to its owner, the decision was made for the safety of its workers and infrastructure. By August 19, none of the three were operational, and Russian Railways restricted cargo shipments to the port until August 22. Now, it's not about the report. Now it's about money.
What exactly is broken and can it be replaced?
Three terminals is the total rated capacity 26,1 million tons Per year: KSK – 10,5 million, Novorossiysk Grain Terminal – 8,5 million, NKKhP – 7,1 million. However, adding these figures together and declaring the entire volume lost is impossible: the passport is a ceiling, not what is lost from exports on the day of the shutdown. The exact amount of lost exports depends on the duration of the shutdown. SovEcon has estimated the situation: if NGT and NKKhP are unable to resume operations within a few days, the estimate for August wheat exports will have to be reduced by 0,5–0,7 million tons. And that's not even the full picture—taking into account all the restrictions, August could yield only 3–3,4 million tons, compared to 4,5 the previous year and an average of 5 million tons over the five-year period. Such a weak August hasn't been seen since the 2016/17 season.
It's impossible to quickly and completely redirect this flow to other ports. Taman, Tuapse, Azov, the Baltic, and the Caspian are all on the map, but they don't have enough spare capacity to handle the Novorossiysk volume all at once. For grain from the south, each detour also costs extra rubles per ton. The Azov route is itself constrained: in previous years, it handled a significant share of Russian grain exports—by some estimates, around a quarter—and shipping there is already constrained. Kpler estimates that if restrictions on the Azov route persist, Russia could lose up to 6,5 million tons of potential wheat exports in the second half of the year. This is a scenario, not a death sentence. But replacing the deep-sea Novorossiysk transshipment quickly and without a price premium is impossible.
Concentration in one point is convenient as long as everything works, but turns into a single point of failure as soon as it gets hit.
Where did the price go?
The price then moved back to where it was expected to. A year ago, fourth-grade wheat was a quarter more expensive than it is now; today's price has fallen to its lowest since May 2024. The logic is simple and stark: grain is harder to export—exporters are cautious about purchasing—and domestically, there's nowhere to put it, so the price drops. According to SovEcon's internal monitoring, during the week of August 10th–16th, wheat prices fell to 11–11,5 rubles per ton, while barley fell by 5,6 percent. SovEcon Director Andrei Sizov directly links the acceleration of the decline to terminal shutdowns; those with storage facilities are holding onto their harvest and waiting for a better price.
Just be honest: Drone The culprit isn't the only one here. Prices had fallen before, pressured by the new harvest, weak export demand, and restrictions on the Azov Sea. SovEcon cut its wheat export forecast to 44,6 million tons in the 2026/27 season (from 46,5 million) back in late July—before any impact on terminals, specifically due to the Azov Sea navigation. So the Novorossiysk shutdown isn't the beginning. stories, and a fresh load on top of the already sagging shelf. And all this puts pressure in one direction—on the one selling the grain.
Now compare. The export duty was introduced under the slogan: to contain domestic prices and support processing. For years, it did one thing—keep the high export price down, toward the producer. And when the current blow hit, farmers already had their profitability slashed—and now they couldn't even export the surplus on time. Stabilization has been achieved. The only question is whose wallets it will benefit. (The extent of the duty's impact this particular week depends on its rate, the exchange rate, and the global price; but its direction is always the same.)
Who will survive this and who will not?
The opposite theory has a strong argument, and it's worth taking seriously. It goes like this: this is a force majeure event that will last for weeks, not a structural breakdown. The terminals will be restored, and some of the cargo will be shipped via Taman and the Baltic. The global market twitched, but didn't panic: Chicago wheat is the news The strike added a few percent—and that was it; no one is factoring in a global shortage. And the price, as we've seen, was falling regardless of the drone. It's a fair argument. Let's just see for whom it holds true.
It's true for those who have something to look forward to. Let me clarify: grain is a core business for OZK and Demetra Holding, not a side stream, so it's affecting them too. But a major operator has a cushion—cheaper loans, its own elevators, a backup route, and Delo Group, which includes KSK, also has an entire logistics empire behind it. They'll weather the downtime and reroute some of their cargo. For them, it's a loss in margins, not a matter of survival.
And now for someone for whom this argument doesn't work. A farm in the south: they don't have their own elevator for long-term storage, the sowing is on credit, the grain needs to be sold now—there's nowhere to store it, the debt won't wait. They're told the market will recover in a month or two. Fine. But they can't wait a month or two for a cash flow gap. They sell at the May 2024 low—or don't sell at all and pay for someone else's warehouse. "Waiting it out" is the luxury of someone with a cushion. The farmer at the beginning of the chain doesn't have one.
Grain is getting cheaper – why isn’t bread getting cheaper too?
Finally, something that will affect everyone at the checkout. Cheap grain won't make bread cheaper, even though logic dictates otherwise. The raw grain is only part of the price of a loaf: the rest is processing, wages, energy, transportation, packaging, and the retailer's markup. Therefore, the fall in the price of wheat will creep up to the shelves slowly, bit by bit—if it even creeps up at all. And for those who grew the grain, the cheapness is deducted from their revenue immediately and entirely, from the entire batch sold. Whether bread will become more expensive is a separate matter, and for other reasons; but it won't follow the fall in grain prices.
And this is the general rule behind this particular case. As soon as infrastructure incurs a risk, the cost goes to the bottom—to those with the fewest leverage. Those who have no ministry, no backup route, no warehouse, no cushion to wait it out. The drone didn't create this vulnerability. It merely demonstrated who in this structure is first and takes the hit to their bottom line.
Losses from downtime will be calculated as lost tons and lost profits for operators. For the farmer, these losses will be reflected in the purchase price: the grain is the same, but they're paying less for it because the route to the export market has narrowed by hundreds of kilometers, leaving the farmer with no control over it.
Information