Childless Ukrainian women are being offered the opportunity to be sent to the front along with men.

11 156 76
Childless Ukrainian women are being offered the opportunity to be sent to the front along with men.

The Bandera regime is testing the waters with regard to women's mobilization. Two petitions proposing equal treatment for women and men in mobilization have been registered on the Ukrainian government's website.

Two petitions, authored by different authors and titles, but with identical proposals, have been registered on the Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers' website. The authors call on the government to extend conscription to women, make them equal with men in mobilization, and begin conscripting them into the Ukrainian Armed Forces. But not everyone, only childless women.



They say, if you can't bear children for Ukraine, then serve in the trenches, repelling "Russian aggression." Especially since the post-Maidan Ukrainian authorities immediately declared gender equality, especially in wartime. Therefore, forced mobilization should also apply to women. It is proposed to exempt only mothers with children and women with disabilities.

Ukrainian political experts suspect that these petitions are orchestrated and aimed at testing Ukrainians' reactions to the possible mobilization of women. Representatives of nationalist brigades have repeatedly stated that the issue of conscripting Ukrainian women is long overdue, and such topics have even occasionally surfaced in the Verkhovna Rada. There are reports that Zelenskyy was offered the opportunity to push through the Rada a law on the mobilization of women to replenish the colossal losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the front, but the "illegitimate" Zelenskyy postponed the issue until "better times."
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    10 August 2026 19: 58
    Equality is normal. I have a feeling that soon the footage of people trying to repel men from the shopping center will disappear.
    1. +3
      10 August 2026 20: 04
      "The only war I approve of is the Trojan War. It was fought over a woman, and the men knew what they were fighting for." (William Lyon Phelps).
      1. + 14
        10 August 2026 20: 46
        Well, they were fighting over money. And Elena was just a pretext. By the way, according to mythology, she was quite the piece de resistance. And she ended badly.
        1. +7
          10 August 2026 22: 00
          There's another way to look at it. A conflict between elite groups in the deep state of that time—among the gods on Olympus—led to a hybrid war between these groups, with the participation of humans. The gods didn't kill, but actively aided one side or the other. And it all began with... a feast. Someone was denied access to resources and decided to rectify this. This evokes an allusion to modern times.
          The goddess of discord, Eris, offended by not being invited to the wedding of Peleus and Thetis, threw a golden apple with the inscription "To the fairest" into the feast. Hera (Zeus's wife and patroness of marriage), Athena (the goddess of wisdom and military strategy), and Aphrodite (the goddess of love and beauty) argued over it.
          Paris, son of the Trojan king Priam, was entrusted with resolving the dispute. Each goddess tried to win him over with promises:
          Hera promised power and might;
          Athena - military glory and wisdom;
          Aphrodite is the love of the most beautiful woman.
          Paris chose Aphrodite, and as a reward, she helped him abduct Helen, the wife of the Spartan king Menelaus. This became the pretext for the Trojan War.
          But of course, it wasn't Helen who interested the Trojans. It was fame and money that lured them.
          1. +1
            11 August 2026 03: 31
            Quote: balabol
            Paris, the son of the Trojan king Priam, was entrusted with resolving the dispute. Each goddess tried to sway him to their side.

            Yeah, they wrote that they were all beautiful in person. So they turned their backs and waited for the judgement.
          2. +1
            11 August 2026 07: 39
            Quote: balabol
            Paris, the son of the Trojan king Priam, was entrusted with resolving the dispute.

            From "Divine Stories" by Felix Krivin.
            Put yourself in Paris's shoes: he is choosing from among the goddesses after all.
            They have a figure more slender than a cypress, and their upbringing is unlike that of others...
            Well, in a word, all the goddesses at their best.
            Paris doesn't want to offend anyone, he's a very gentle person, Paris.
            And, using his judicial power, he cuts the apple into pieces and awards first prize to all three.
            "Well, did you see that cretin?" cried the indignant Athena. "He cut me off in two pieces!"
            "No, I have it!" the goddess Aphrodite exclaimed no less angrily, looking down on the others.
            And Hera, a real shrew, rushed about like a panther in an enclosure, threatening to send Paris to the galleys, promising him cholera and the plague.
            But he didn’t know why he suffered such a fate.
            And he stood, punishing himself and tormenting himself and asking heaven:
            - Why ?!
          3. 0
            11 August 2026 09: 16
            Quote: balabol
            To Paris, son of the Trojan king

            It's somehow doubtful that they wanted to resolve a dispute between the gods with the help of some king's son. That's not the level. What do the gods care about the opinion of a mortal?
            1. 0
              11 August 2026 18: 09
              Firstly, according to legend, he was very reasonable and fair in his decisions.
              Secondly, I didn't yet belong to any of the competing elite groups. I was sort of an independent expert.
              The mentality of those gods wasn't much different from the serpentarium of a large communal apartment. Sworn friends, you can't turn your back.
        2. 0
          11 August 2026 15: 11
          Quote: Voskolina
          Well, they were fighting over money. And Elena was just a pretext. By the way, according to mythology, she was quite the piece de resistance. And she ended badly.

          How do you know how she finished?
          1. 0
            11 August 2026 15: 23
            Well, she didn't just finish, she ended her earthly existence. Read mythology; there are several versions—either she was hanged or stoned. And other stories tell the same story.
            1. +1
              11 August 2026 15: 24
              Quote: Voskolina
              Well, not finished, but ended her earthly existence. Read the mythology; there are several versions—either she was hanged or stoned.

              It would have been better to give it to the soldiers...
              1. 0
                11 August 2026 15: 27
                The age was no longer the same. Time had passed.
                1. +1
                  11 August 2026 15: 28
                  Quote: Voskolina
                  The age was no longer the same. Time had passed.

                  So you could turn the hut toward the forest and bend it a little. Matrons took care of themselves back then... feel
      2. 0
        10 August 2026 21: 24
        The Trojan War is a phantom reflection of the Crusades against Constantinople. There was also a religious motif.
        1. 0
          11 August 2026 00: 07
          Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
          The Trojan War is a phantom reflection of the Crusades against Constantinople. There was also a religious motif.

          Didn't you know? Schliemann discovered the ruins of Troy based on Homer's tales. Or was it just a coincidence? He even found some gold there. I saw Troy's gold in a museum.
          1. -1
            11 August 2026 07: 54
            Quote: Bearded
            I saw the gold of Troy in the museum.
            I saw it too. So what?
            In fact, those areas in Turkey are so densely dotted with various ruins of medieval settlements that it was easy to "find suitable ruins." But both historians and archaeologists understood that they needed to dig up some kind of proof that this was "Homer's Troy." This "task" was accomplished by Heinrich Schliemann on Hisarlik Hill. The excavated ruins revealed that there had indeed been a settlement there, measuring a mere 120 by 120 meters. There was, of course, nothing "Homeric" about it. However, Schliemann understood that something extraordinary was required, and in May 1873, he "unexpectedly" discovered a gold hoard, which he immediately proclaimed to be "the treasure of the ancient Priam"—the very same one described by Homer. However, today, many historians believe the entire story of the hoard was a falsification.
            Schliemann did not disclose the exact date of the treasure's discovery, concealing information about where, when, and under what circumstances he "discovered" the ancient treasure. Detailed "inventories and reports" were made later. Schliemann changed the date of the discovery several times and remained unclear. Schliemann described the location of the discovery in various ways. Schliemann claimed that only his wife, Sophia, was with him at the time of the "fortunate find." No one else witnessed where and how Schliemann discovered the "ancient gold." Meanwhile, Schliemann himself admitted in one of his letters that his wife was not in Troy on the day of the "discovery," but that "wishing to make an archaeologist of her," he wrote that Sophia was with him. It later became known that
            It is said that G. Schliemann conducted some mysterious negotiations with jewelers, offering to make supposed copies of "antique" gold jewelry he had supposedly discovered. Schliemann wrote some very interesting things: "The jeweler must be well versed in antiquities, and he must promise not to put his own mark on the copies. I must choose a man who will not betray me and will charge a reasonable price for the work."
            It's no wonder that some prominent scholars consider the treasure "discovered" by Schliemann a forgery. Archaeologist Ellie Krish writes that "ambiguities and contradictions in the various accounts of this discovery... have led skeptics to doubt the find's authenticity." William M. Calder III, professor of classical studies at Colorado State University, called Schliemann an eccentric, audacious fantasist, and a pathological liar. And critic D. A. Traill declared the entire story of the treasure a fabrication.
            It's clear that there are no inscriptions on the items in the "discovered" treasure, which precludes attributing them not only to King Priam but also to any specific references. In other words, Schliemann simply used the gold to "substantiate" Frank Calvert's earlier hypothesis. Had Calvert named a different location, Schliemann would have found the same "ancient treasure of Priam" with equal success and just as quickly.
            Incidentally, Heinrich Schliemann is believed to have discovered another remarkable "ancient" burial site, namely, in Mycenae. It's simply astonishing how he, a non-archaeologist but a very wealthy man, was so lucky when it came to "ancient gold."
            But where did Schliemann get the gold? It turns out that in 1850, Schliemann left for the United States to take up business after his brother's death. At the height of the California gold rush, he settled in Sacramento and established a gold buying and trading business there.
            From October 1851 to April 1852, Schliemann sent $1,350,000 worth of gold dust to the Rothschild bank in San Francisco. On his most successful days, his income reached $30,000 (approximately 100 kg of placer gold). This high turnover was due to the fact that he offered prospectors the highest rate—$17 per ounce.
            They write that
            This business allowed Schliemann to amass a fortune, which he later invested in his archaeological projects.
            Yeah, but it wouldn't hurt to clarify what is meant by the term "he invested." laughing
          2. +1
            11 August 2026 08: 55
            Even school teachers in the 70s and 80s told us that Schliemann's gold was fake. Has anything changed since then?
        2. +1
          11 August 2026 15: 31
          Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
          The Trojan War is a phantom reflection of the Crusades against Constantinople. There was also a religious motif.

          Phantom images are echoes of the past. Considering that first, Helen was on the loose, and Constantinople didn't exist yet...
          1. -1
            11 August 2026 16: 36
            Troy didn't actually exist. It's just a different take on the Crusades against Constantinople. A creative retelling in the form of myths. And even Achilles is most likely the Russian prince Svyatoslav.
    2. +3
      10 August 2026 20: 08
      Quote: Vladimir Lytkin
      but the “illegitimate” one postponed this issue until “better times.”

      Well, that means those better times have already arrived on the Outskirts! But it seems to me that sending Oksanka women to the front is out of desperation or drug addiction.
      1. +1
        10 August 2026 20: 10
        Or a great way to shut up the dissatisfied and clean up social spending at the same time.
        1. +1
          10 August 2026 21: 36
          There's no point at all. Sending them to the front after 45 is like sending a man after 50. And if it's earlier, that's completely weird.
          1. +3
            10 August 2026 22: 55
            How can I say it? Recycling is cheaper than a pension.
            1. 0
              10 August 2026 23: 00
              Pensions in Ukraine are weak, so this argument doesn't work. And ours aren't exactly stellar either.
              1. +2
                10 August 2026 23: 23
                Weak ones, or maybe not, are tangible. You can touch them and master them. But like some, they don't have the guts. Just take them and explain that they're still in their prime.
          2. +1
            11 August 2026 15: 13
            At 45, the woman is a berry again! feel ...............................
      2. +1
        10 August 2026 21: 05
        LIONnvrsk -
        Well, that means those better times have already arrived on the Outskirts! But it seems to me that sending Oksanka women to the front is out of desperation or drug addiction.
        - rather from the latter.
      3. 0
        10 August 2026 22: 15
        ...or so that they don't breed baboons
        1. +1
          11 August 2026 15: 14
          Quote from: ALCA056000
          ...or so that they don't breed baboons

          What a strange conclusion you have. Send young women into the trenches and hope they remain virgins?! winked
          1. 0
            11 August 2026 18: 36
            Well... as the saucepan itself claims in some of its resources, life in the trenches lasts for several days... maybe not virgins, but it's quite possible to go to Bandera
    3. +3
      10 August 2026 21: 13
      But in lace panties.
      1. 0
        10 August 2026 22: 06
        It's rare that you make an adequate comment, but this one is spot on!
    4. 0
      11 August 2026 03: 34
      It seems they still have enough female volunteers for another year. And then, most likely, a symbiosis of three paths will begin (depending on social tension):
      - accelerated deportation of Ukrainians from abroad;
      - forced mobilization of women;
      - gradual reduction of the conscription age.
    5. +2
      11 August 2026 15: 10
      Quote: Single-n
      Equality is normal. I have a feeling that soon the footage of people trying to repel men from the shopping center will disappear.

      Genocide, undisguised. Young men for meat, fertile women too. Or are these idiots trying to impregnate single women this way?
  2. +3
    10 August 2026 20: 01
    When will the Volksshurm be organized?
    The drug addict actually decided to exterminate the losers!
    1. 0
      10 August 2026 22: 10
      Do the Zionists plan to return to Ukrainian territory? And then there will be a cleansing of Poland and Germany? A clearing of living space?
      Are we really witnessing a new idea and a new historical process? For now, these are just questions.
  3. +1
    10 August 2026 20: 01
    Is this eugenics or not yet?

    P.S.: Will they continue to send out orders based on the shape of the skull?
  4. +1
    10 August 2026 20: 05
    Women who are unable to have children should be treated as disabled people, just like men. hi
    1. +3
      10 August 2026 20: 11
      andrey martov
      should be equated with disabled people, just like men.

      I remember in the USSR they had a tax on "eggs." Even people with reproductive disorders paid taxes to the state treasury. As the saying goes, "I want to, but I can't."
  5. +8
    10 August 2026 20: 07
    Just go ahead and round them up already, what are you clowning around for? It's clear where this is all heading – the 404 area should be completely cleared and deserted. All these so-called handsome guys and girls – in the West's opinion, they're completely unnecessary there. At least they're not slaves, huh?
    1. +4
      10 August 2026 20: 30
      You're right: I also had the same feeling that they decided to thoroughly cleanse the Ukrainian gene pool... so that there would certainly be no chance for recovery.
      1. +2
        10 August 2026 21: 27
        In fact, they've decided to exterminate us. And the purge of Ukrainians is a side process for them, of no independent significance.
        1. +4
          10 August 2026 21: 36
          Of course. Who's denying it? But there's a special approach to the Ukrainians, since this territory has already been officially sold to the US and partially to EU countries. And they have their own views on who will eventually inhabit these lands. They don't even think about the current population.
  6. +2
    10 August 2026 20: 08
    but the “illegitimate” one postponed this issue until “better times.”

    By refusing, Zelya "grew" in the eyes of his compatriots and played to the crowd.
  7. 0
    10 August 2026 20: 11
    If they are captured, they may have children. Then they may be demobilized.
    1. +2
      10 August 2026 21: 27
      Why wait for captivity? You might not even wait...
      And so, in between the "counter-attacks"... there are quite a few who want to cover like a bull a sheep, it's not a difficult task )))
      1. +5
        10 August 2026 23: 22
        They will begin processing them in the dungeons of the TCC, before reaching the front.
        In my personal opinion, Oksana deserved it.
    2. -4
      10 August 2026 23: 39
      Quote: Ivanhoe
      If they are captured, they may have children.

      Well, you Russians need to feed other people's children; you have enough Tajik children.
  8. +2
    10 August 2026 20: 22
    They actually started testing the waters back in the fall of 2022, passing a bill that declared almost all women, including waitresses and librarians, liable for military service. People were outraged, saying it was a mistake. But as we see, there's no smoke without fire.
  9. +4
    10 August 2026 20: 29
    Well, women fought for their rights, in Europe their rights were firmly established, they have more rights there than men, so be kind enough to get into the trenches!
  10. +7
    10 August 2026 20: 32
    - They swim beautifully....
    - Who?
    - Well, that team over there, in the striped swimsuits.
    Conversation on the banks of the Tisza.
  11. +3
    10 August 2026 20: 39
    Well, that's right, if you haven't given birth yet, then tomorrow is no longer necessary, because there is no tomorrow on the outskirts.
  12. +3
    10 August 2026 21: 03
    Cannibalistic power in all its glory
    1. SSR
      0
      10 August 2026 21: 20
      Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
      Cannibalistic power in all its glory

      They need to flee, Russia is still the only country that can help them.
      1. 0
        10 August 2026 21: 30
        We don't need them; let them move to Western Ukraine. Chances are, our troops won't go there.
        1. 0
          10 August 2026 22: 55
          Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
          There is a possibility that our troops will not go there.

          The Russians won't go, but others will quickly take their place.
          1. 0
            10 August 2026 23: 02
            Who would go there if the entire population of the syr'e were concentrated in three regions of Western Ukraine? World history has never seen such a viper's nest, and perhaps never will.
      2. +2
        10 August 2026 21: 36
        Russia is still the only country that can help them.
        No way, no way, those who wanted to leave are already outside the 404th, and it seems like only the earth can fix these
      3. 0
        10 August 2026 23: 37
        Quote from S.S.R.
        They need to flee, Russia is still the only country that can help them.

        Don't take the sin upon yourself, you don't need them if you don't want problems.
      4. 0
        11 August 2026 01: 17
        It's not easy to escape across the front line.
      5. The comment was deleted.
  13. ssz
    +3
    10 August 2026 21: 18
    Oh, they make porn in the trenches...
  14. +2
    10 August 2026 22: 10
    Where will they get children from?
    They put the young men in the fields, and now they're throwing restless women there too...
    However, the green-eyed ones have long since lost their bearings, as if there was nowhere further to go... however, "there's a knock from below", once again... fool
    1. +4
      10 August 2026 23: 08
      And the Oksanas themselves weren't involved in the process, were they? They were jumping around and how. So they could be sent away.
      But these are still fairy tales from the other world. It's unlikely we'll ever see anything like this in real life.
      1. +1
        10 August 2026 23: 26
        Who knows how far they've jumped... in any case, it's not without reason... fool
        1. -1
          10 August 2026 23: 32
          No... They still have a couple million more in mobilization potential, unfortunately. They won't stoop to women. They could very well have to fight for another couple of years.
  15. 0
    10 August 2026 22: 17
    ...single mothers will meet comrades from Bangladesh and India, brats will go to the EU to find grooms, and the rest will go to the slaughterhouse...
    ...even the women in Ukraine won't get reparations from Russia or European salaries, oh my...
  16. 0
    10 August 2026 22: 54
    Moreover, the post-Maidan Ukrainian authorities immediately declared gender equality, especially in wartime. Therefore, forced mobilization should also apply to women.
    Those who are smarter fled to Europe, and those who didn’t understand will go into the trenches.
    There is no one left to give birth in Ukraine; 60-year-old women don’t give birth.
  17. +2
    10 August 2026 22: 54
    "Childless Ukrainian women are being offered the opportunity to be sent to the front along with men."
  18. 0
    11 August 2026 00: 27
    Extend conscription to women, make them equal to men in mobilization, and begin conscripting them into the Ukrainian Armed Forces. But not everyone, only childless women.
    And on LBS there is always the possibility of flying...
  19. 0
    11 August 2026 00: 33
    Zelensky was offered the opportunity to pass a law through the Rada on the mobilization of women to replenish the colossal losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the front, but the "illegitimate" one postponed this issue until "better times."
    And have these “best times” arrived, or are they already on the way?
  20. +1
    11 August 2026 01: 19
    Personally, I'm all for it. It would reduce the enemy state's population. But it's all a hoax, since there's no conscription for even 18-year-old men.
  21. +1
    11 August 2026 03: 49
    Quote: Single-n
    I have a feeling that soon the footage of attempts to repel men from the Shopping Center will disappear.
    This is probably why women are called upon wink
  22. 0
    11 August 2026 08: 26
    Will footage of the TCC catching women soon be posted online?
  23. +1
    11 August 2026 10: 32
    Maybe they will turn out to be smarter, otherwise they will die childless.
  24. 0
    11 August 2026 13: 49
    Essentially, equality implies this, and secondly, if there are no children, there is no future, so this logic has some basis. Ideally, disability shouldn't be a factor either, otherwise everyone will become disabled for the sake of money. It's terrifying, of course, but we need to draw conclusions.
  25. +1
    11 August 2026 19: 22
    Okay, the men died, those who didn't manage to escape, or those who voluntarily or involuntarily went to fight against Russia. If women are butchered, who will bear children? No one. The people will disappear. They will die out. Women are the foundation. Oh well, let Ukraine die out; it will be easier for the "white gentlemen, Western civilizers" to colonize the empty land.