Airplane: An Anthem for the Strong in Spirit

3 861 15
Airplane: An Anthem for the Strong in Spirit

Dear reader, please use your imagination a little; it will be greatly needed. Modern media allow you to do anything, even to the point of imagining yourself as a modern pilot, so onward and upward!

Just imagine:



- a high-altitude compensation suit that allows for overloads of up to 10G, controlled by a computer that predicts overloads depending on the maneuver;
- a radar that allows you to see at distances inaccessible to the human eye;
- a computer that helps control a multi-ton, and also aerodynamically unstable, machine;
- a helmet with a screen that displays all the necessary information, protects from many factors and supplies oxygen;
- a chair containing the catapult's pyropatrons, a parachute, and an emergency supply of food and water, allowing one to hold out until help arrives.

At this point, you just need to look to the left. And see THIS there.


Maybe not right away, maybe in about 20 seconds, but you'll realize that this strange apparatus, made of plywood, cables, and a small amount of metal, contains NOTHING from the above list. It's 1906, after all...

Instead of a suit, they wore ordinary clothes, a helmet—hand-sewn in a tailor's shop from leather or thick fabric, and goggles—the most ordinary kind, called "automobile goggles." There was such an innovation on earth as the automobile, for which accessories had already begun to be produced: high-top boots, elbow-length leather gloves, helmets, and "canned" goggles. Not to protect against "tremendous" speeds, but from oil, turpentine, kerosene, and other pleasant liquids without which internal combustion engines couldn't function, but which they spewed out in quantities worthy of frying the driver or pilot.

In general, both pilots and car owners of the early 20th century were real daredevils.


As for equipment, budding aviators used whatever was at hand, outfitting themselves with whatever they could find. Style was created right before their eyes.

A parachute... We won't even mention the catapult; it appeared in 1943, and there was no parachute either. There was a device for rescuing aeronauts, a huge contraption that was attached to the side of a hot air balloon or aerostat, and Gleb Kotelnikov's invention of the knapsack parachute was still four years away. And even in World War I, parachutes were a rarity; pilots fought alongside or outside of their planes.


Gleb Kotelnikov and his backpack parachute

The parachute came into use as a means of rescuing flight personnel after the First World War. The first person to use a rescue parachute in the USSR was test pilot Mikhail Gromov.


It happened on June 23, 1927, at Khodynka Airfield. Gromov deliberately put the plane into a spin from which he was unable to recover, and at an altitude of 600 meters, he parachuted out.

Incidentally, the seatbelts we were accustomed to weren't there either. It wasn't that long before they were available, but...

The first seat belt, or rather, a seatbelt, appeared in 1911 in the United States. The idea was brought to fruition by American pilot Benjamin D. Foulois, a student of the Wright brothers, a future major general, and then a lieutenant.


After nearly falling out of the cockpit while flying the Wright No. 1 airplane, Foulois commissioned the cavalry to make him a leather belt about 120 cm long to tie himself to the seat.

In Europe, Pyotr Nesterov and Adolphe Pegoud pioneered the use of seat belts. Both men concluded that such equipment was necessary when preparing an aircraft for a loop-the-loop. Nikolai Zhukovsky, in fact, provided Nesterov with the theoretical calculations and justification for this necessity when he developed the theory of the loop-the-loop's feasibility. Thus, the aircraft that performed the world's first two loop-the-loop maneuvers were already equipped with such safety devices.

However, seat belts only became widely used after the First World War, although during it, many manufacturers began installing them directly at their factories. American pilots generally favored this safety measure, unlike their European counterparts.

At the beginning of the century, it was truly the start of all starts: just having taken wing, aviation It really began to develop at an unprecedented pace: both improved foreign models and the first independent developments appeared in various countries, following the pioneers, who undoubtedly were France and Great Britain.

But other countries—Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the United States—were not far behind. Moreover, Russia was a fully-fledged participant in this race, developing and building its own airplanes, which were no less impressive in terms of design; the only major drawback was the complete lack of domestic engines and 100% dependence on foreign manufacturers for supplies.

But import substitution only began under Soviet rule, in the second half of the 30s, and before that, Russian aircraft manufacturers were dependent on supplies from abroad. But they built. That's just the way they are, these Russians...

And the French were the trendsetters, yes. Aviation at that time generally spoke French. Caudrons, Blériots, Voisins, Farmans, Breguet, Dewoitines, Moranes, Nieuports, Saulniers, and many others colored the skies with the French tricolor.


The Voisin. A truss biplane that was actively used and improved during those years. The Voisin brothers had several modifications for different purposes: Type de Course, Type Bordeaux, and Type Militaire. The horror of these creations was mesmerizing.


Interestingly, Voisins weren't just purchased in Russia, they were also built under license—at the Dux plant in Moscow and the Lebedev plant in St. Petersburg. Many Russian and even Soviet pilots received their first flights in these aircraft.

How can we not cite the legendary Bleriot 11 airplane as an example here?


Louis Blériot's monoplane became famous back in 1909, when it was flown across the English Channel itself! An unprecedented flight that rightfully elevated the pilot-designer to the pinnacle of fame.


Bleriot XI over the English Channel

But even in 1910, the airplane often featured in aviation competitions and demonstration flights.


Nieuport monoplane

In 1910, a monoplane designed by Edouard and Charles Nieuport distinguished itself at the Reims competition. Its key feature was that Nieuport, for the first time, completely covered the fuselage with skin. This made a huge impression on contemporaries; it turned out that an airplane could be more than just a mysterious construction of sticks, cables, and planes; it could also be savagely beautiful! Moreover, the machine was relatively lightweight and powered by a relatively small 20-horsepower engine.

And what about us?

It is customary for us to talk about the genius of Sikorsky (and absolutely rightly so), the talents of Grigorovich, Tupolev and... and on this point, as it were, story Aviation development isn't exactly halting—it's being curtailed. It's being curtailed politically, primarily because many aeronautical engineers rejected Soviet rule and left Russia. Sikorsky simply can't be erased from history; he's ingrained in it. Removing Igor Sikorsky would be like erasing the entire development of Russian aviation. But we'll talk about those who are traditionally overlooked, even though their traces in the history of the skies are quite visible.


Prince Alexander Sergeevich Kudashev, professor at the Kyiv Polytechnic Institute. A pioneer of domestic aircraft construction, he was the first Russian to fly a domestically designed airplane. This occurred on May 23, 1910.


The Kudashev-1 was one of the first Russian airplanes of an original design. It was a truss biplane with a forward elevator and a 35-horsepower Anzani engine.

On May 23, 1910, Prince A.S. Kudashev personally demonstrated the flight: the craft flew in a straight line for about 70 meters. Later, modifications appeared: the Kudashev-2 (with a 50-horsepower Gnome engine and without a forward elevator) and the Kudashev-3 monoplane.


The Kudashev-2 was also a truss biplane, powered by a 50-horsepower Gnome Omega engine and a conventional horizontal tail, lacking a forward elevator. Its distinctive landing gear design was remarkable. Ashwood arches served as struts, and a through axle with wheels was attached to the curves of these arches with rubber shock absorbers. The first aircraft suspension with shock-absorbing elements was evident!

By 1911, the prince-professor had created his first monoplane, the Kudashev-3, which was distinguished by its exceptional lightness, simplicity, and low cost.




"Kudashev-3", reconstruction

In 1911, A. S. Kudashev was invited to work at the aircraft workshop of the Russian-Baltic Wagon Plant (RBVZ) in Riga. In Riga, Kudashev built his fourth airplane, the Kudashev-4 (RBVZ-1), which took to the air on April 2, 1911.


Ten days later, the Kudashev-4 was demonstrated at Russia's first International Aeronautical Exhibition, which opened in the capital's Mikhailovsky Manege. The aircraft received a large silver medal from the Imperial Russian Technical Society and participated in several exhibitions and competitions.

Unfortunately, for reasons unknown today, Kudashev emigrated to France in 1914, where he continued his teaching career. With the outbreak of World War I, he volunteered for the front, where he died in 1917.


Yakov Modestovich Gakkel

History's most underrated Russian and Soviet engineer and inventor, he made a significant contribution to the development of domestic aircraft and diesel locomotive manufacturing in the first half of the 20th century, authored numerous scientific papers and inventions, and was an electrical engineer. He was awarded the title of Honored Scientist and Engineer of the RSFSR (1940). A pioneer of aircraft manufacturing, along with Sikorsky and Kudashev, he suffered utterly in the aircraft industry but redeemed himself in diesel locomotive manufacturing.


The Gakkel-I biplane, built in 1909 and otherwise called the YaMG (after the initials of its creator), with a 25 hp Antoinette engine transmitted thrust via belts to two propellers mounted between the wings.

The airplane's design was unique because, according to Gakkel, the aircraft's lifting surfaces should not be aligned, as was common elsewhere, but rather staggered, with the lower wing extending forward. In the 20s, the staggered wing arrangement became the norm, with the upper wing being positioned forward.

Testing of this airplane failed; the plane was badly damaged in a fire and was not restored.

Gakkel built his second airplane using a "classic" design, with a tail truss, abandoning the complex and unreliable twin-rotor design. Unfortunately, the Gakkel II never got off the ground.


The designer rebuilt it into the "Gakkel III," which featured a number of important innovations: for example, coil springs for shock absorption and anti-coupling skids on the landing gear. These things can be seen on many airplanes; they look like skis between the landing gear wheels. But they're not for sliding on snow; they're to prevent the plane from nose-diving (flipping forward).

On May 24, 1910, Gakkel made a solo flight of approximately 200 meters in the Gakkel III airplane. However, due to its unreliable engine, this aircraft was unable to achieve long flights.

Nikolai Vasilievich Rebikov.

Information about N.V. Rebikov is extremely fragmentary. He is mentioned exclusively in the context of early Russian aircraft construction from 1910 to 1912, as a "then-famous figure in Russian aviation" and the creator of the first Russian production aircraft, the Rossiya-A. No later references to his life could be found in available sources; there is information about an accident on July 5, 1912, when Rebikov's flight ended in a crash, from which the aircraft was not repaired. It is possible that this marked the end of the career, and perhaps even the life, of this talented designer.

In the fall of 1909, St. Petersburg lawyer S. S. Shchetinin founded the First Russian Aeronautics Partnership plant. In February 1910, under the direction of engineer Rebikov, this plant began producing the first domestically produced aircraft of the "Russia-A" series.



Russia-B

On the one hand, there's the monoplane, which Rebikov was working on because he was looking at the Bleriot XI. But, excuse me, the Bleriot XI was all over the newspapers for a year! After all, it was this plane that crossed the English Channel between Great Britain and France in just over thirty minutes!

Okay, go ahead and laugh. Old Louis will chuckle too from the other side.

The Rossiya-B flew for the first time on August 12, 1910. It was tested by pilot K.K. Artseulov, who would later become a legend. This airplane, too, was produced in a series of five! It was powered by an Anzani engine producing only 25 horsepower, but it flew, and it flew really well!

The Rossiya-B emerged during the formative years of the domestic aviation industry. Shchetinin's factory in St. Petersburg was just gaining momentum: initially, it fulfilled orders for flying clubs and private individuals, assembling airplanes from foreign manufacturers individually. And in 1912, it began receiving orders from the military department. And it worked, because the company later became famous for mass-producing flying boats designed by Dmitry Grigorovich.

Overall, the Rossiya-B was one of the major steps in the development of Russian aircraft manufacturing at the beginning of the 20th century—a transition from copying foreign designs to developing our own solutions, albeit based on foreign prototypes.

Chaotic, desperate, I would say reckless, but the airplanes were tearing into the sky. Russian, French, German, English, American, Italian. People watching the "Nesterov loop" or Pegoud's "upside-down" flights saw something new, attractions of unprecedented daring and technical perfection. And this despite the fact that just 10 years earlier they were applauding aeronauts in hot air balloons.

"He blew up the furwin with stinking smoke and rose above the church, and the priest cursed him" - well, that's already a classic, isn't it?

But those who stormed the skies with 20 to 50 horsepower cars saw something entirely different. They had their own horizons.

Alas, we will never know what Arthur Hubert Latham felt on August 26, 1909, when he set a distance record: he flew 156 kilometers non-stop in 2,5 hours.


Hats off, dear readers. 62,5 km/h. Two and a half hours in the sky in the elegant Antoinette, at a simply insane speed.


On January 7, 1910, Latham reached an altitude of 1100 meters—a colossal achievement for airplanes of the time (the previous record was about 500 meters). He later broke his own record, reaching 1384 meters.

Truly, these weren't just men—they were giants. It was a time of such breakthroughs that only the smiling Soviet lad Yuri Gagarin could match these guys—the Wrights, Bleriot, Latham, Nesterov, Pegoud, and the rest—in the sheer madness of their accomplishments. But behind Yuri Gagarin stood one-sixth of the earth's surface and 200 million people.

Behind the pioneers of aviation stood automobile engines, wood, fabric, and simply a mad desire to fly.

And now for more than 120 years we, humanity, have been in the sky.

December 17, 1903 is often cited as the starting point. On this day, brothers Wilbur and Orville Wright made a controlled flight in the Flyer 1 at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, USA.


What was important was that the Wrights didn't just get the machine airborne. They solved a key problem—achieving controllability in all three axes (roll, pitch, and yaw). This allowed the pilot to actually control the craft, not just stay aloft. That day, Orville Wright flew about 36 meters in 12 seconds, and later that same day, December 17, there were even longer flights.

But there were earlier attempts that are also worth mentioning.

On October 9, 1890, French engineer Clement Ader took off from the ground in the Aeolus (with a steam engine) and flew approximately 50 meters.


This was the first time that a heavier-than-air craft took off under its own power, without external assistance.


However, the Aeolus was uncontrollable - after a short "jump" it fell.

In Russia, A. F. Mozhaisky is sometimes remembered: his flying machine with a steam engine and two propellers made a short experimental flight/takeoff with a man on board in 1882.


In Sytin’s Military Encyclopedia (1914 edition), in the article “Mozhaisky, Alexander Fedorovich,” it says:

The airplane's first flight, over a military field in Krasnoye Selo, yielded poor results: the craft lifted off the ground, but, being unstable, tilted sideways and broke a wing. Further experiments were not carried out due to a lack of funds. Mozhaisky's aircraft is noteworthy as the first practical attempt to build a large airplane.

Many Soviet researchers (V.F. Bolkhovitinov, P.D. Duz, V.B. Shavrov, and others) believed that the plane actually lifted off the ground. However, they acknowledged that external factors likely contributed to the liftoff: the slope of the runway, the slope of the ground, and a strong headwind.

In particular, P. D. Duz considers the use of an inclined runway for testing to be an established fact, believing that the same "inclined rails" on which the aircraft had previously "run upward" were used for the aircraft's takeoff roll. Meanwhile, V. N. Bychkov and D. A. Sobolev believe that Mozhaisky's use of a significantly inclined runway is not documented.

Another important milestone: on October 23, 1906, Brazilian-French aviator Alberto Santos-Dumont made a public flight in Paris in a 14-bis airplane.


His achievement was that the craft took off, flew, and landed independently—without a catapult, rails, or strong headwinds, using only its own engine. This proved that heavier-than-air craft could, in principle, take off on their own.

Therefore, in different countries and among different aviation historians, different devices may be called “first”: some emphasize controllability (Wright), some - the very fact of takeoff due to engine thrust (Ader), and some - independent takeoff without auxiliary means (Santos-Dumont).

But in any case, all of these are milestones in the upward movement, into the sky, which was for many centuries inaccessible to man.


A clumsy and strange construction of wood, fabric, and steel tubing, with a car engine and a chassis with bicycle wheels, gave humanity its ticket to the sky. Those who launched these strange structures into the air believed that the sky would become humanly masterful.

Our series will be dedicated to both these strange structures and the people who tried to subjugate the sky to man.

Продолжение следует ...
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    9 August 2026 05: 07
    For some reason, the Author, turning to the history of aviation, completely missed a theoretical and very important part of it, without which we would still be flying in balloons and airships, namely, N. Zhukovsky's wing lift theorem (Kutta-Zhukovsky theorem), where he scientifically explained and mathematically precisely described the mechanism by which the pressure difference above and below the wing arises. This became the scientific foundation for aircraft design and the subsequent development of aviation, and his theory formed the basis for all aerodynamic calculations of wings, propellers, turbine blades, and compressors. In a sense, N. Zhukovsky laid the foundations of all modern aerodynamics.

    P.S. Let me just remind you that before the appearance Kutta-Zhukovsky theorems, aircraft were built by eye - by trial and error, without precise mathematical calculations, thanks to which engineers obtained a precise theory of how exactly to build...
    1. +3
      9 August 2026 05: 43
      Quote: Luminman
      In a sense, N. Zhukovsky laid the foundations of all modern aerodynamics.
      N. Zhukovsky's wing lift theorem (Kutta-Zhukovsky theorem)

      You're exaggerating the importance of theory...let me remind you of the Il-112V in Kubinka. It was built according to the formulas, even taking into account the Coandv effect, and yet it couldn't fly with one engine, even empty...
      Academician Chudakov once developed the theory of the automobile, so what if we didn't start making better cars? The development of wind tunnels and powerful engines influenced aviation, but this formula isn't very effective. But with a good engine, even the fence will fly, as they say.
      1. +6
        9 August 2026 07: 01
        Quote: Konnick
        You exaggerate the importance of theory.
        I already wrote above that without this theory, engineers simply wouldn't be able to create anything. It's the basis for the operation of wings and propellers...
        Quote: Konnick
        Let me remind you about the Il-112V in Kubinka. It was built according to the formulas, even taking into account the Coandv effect, but it just couldn't fly with one engine, even empty...
        I will also remind you that no accident on one of the engines can in any way lead to the destruction of the aircraftNo one knows what actually happened to the Il-112V. First, a fire broke out, followed by a surge that destroyed the engine, with debris damaging the fuel system, control systems, and wing mechanization. This, in turn, led to a monstrous lateral roll, which resulted in the wing separating, causing it to lose its aerodynamics. (according to the theorem of N. Zhukovsky that you reject) and further overturning. The whole question here is about the fire—why it started...
        Quote: Konnick
        The creation of the wind tunnel and powerful engines influenced aviation, but this formula is not very
        Without N. Zhukovsky's theoretical calculations, the creation of a wind tunnel would have been simply impossible. And without his theory, it would have been unnecessary.
        Quote: Konnick
        And with a good engine, even the fence will fly, as they say.
        An axe can also fly without an engine, if you throw it up. Only then does it fall back to the ground like an axe...
      2. +5
        9 August 2026 08: 02
        Quote: Konnick
        You exaggerate the importance of theory...

        There's nothing more practical than a good theory! (C) Plumber Afonya
        Perhaps, in the days of Bleriot and Sopwith, it was still possible to build something by trial and error and even fly it. But can you imagine a modern fighter jet built without aerodynamic, strength, and other calculations?
      3. +3
        9 August 2026 11: 03
        To be fair, theory has no bearing on design flaws. And if the controls on one side of the wing jam, the plane will be in trouble. With or without theory.
      4. +1
        10 August 2026 15: 58
        Without theory, it's impossible to build a flying aircraft. But that doesn't mean it will fly well or break down. Even carefully designed aircraft suffer from a host of teething problems before they reach production. And theory doesn't always cover all the nuances, especially when building an aircraft with innovative solutions. Read the history of the Su-27: how many failures and disasters it suffered before it was developed into a production model, which became the world's best fighter.
    2. +3
      9 August 2026 11: 01
      This is all interesting. But we know nothing about the aviation theorists of France, Germany, or Britain. And the Wright brothers built the first airplane. In the USA. And it's somehow strange that the leading aviation theorist came from a country where aviation was the most backward, even among developed nations. Either they had their own theorists, or his theory wasn't all that important. So, okay, Tsiolkovsky was ahead of his time. But Zhukovsky wasn't ahead of anyone. And that's absolutely certain.
      1. +5
        9 August 2026 18: 25
        Quote: MCmaximus
        And it’s somehow strange that the main theoretician of aviation became a man in a country where aviation was the most backward among developed countries.
        There's nothing strange about this. A narrowing and then expanding channel for accelerating liquid and gas for its own greek fire The Byzantines used it, but it was only a thousand years later that Laval, in whose honor this pipe is named, theoretically substantiated it. Laval nozzleMedieval architects erected magnificent Gothic cathedrals, completely ignorant of the strength of materials, which would only appear 800 years later. And this could go on forever. But when a coherent theory emerges, designing structures is much easier and more predictable. Such a theory was created by N. Zhukovsky. And you're probably one of those who believes everything is bad here, and there Everything is fine?
        1. 0
          10 August 2026 01: 49
          I'm convinced that you can't build an airplane without theory. Before there were theories, all sorts of crocodiles were built. And during World War I, there were planes galore. Those same wing profiles and experiments with them were being developed by the Germans long before Zhukovsky. And they also switched to monoplanes.
          And Zhukovsky is the father of RUSSIAN aviation. But not global aviation.
  2. +5
    9 August 2026 10: 19
    Everything would be fine, but
    aerodynamically unstable

    The correct term is "Aerodynamically unstable"
  3. BAI
    +1
    9 August 2026 15: 17
    If we mention the history of aviation in Russia, then where are Grigorovich's seaplanes?
    1. +2
      10 August 2026 11: 14
      Most likely, being mentioned here, "in the next episode"
    2. 0
      12 September 2026 20: 41
      They are mentioned in the article, read the entire text, not just selectively.
  4. 0
    10 August 2026 15: 06
    The last photo, judging by everything, is Harry Houdini himself. Let's recall Doctorow's famous novel "Ragtime":

    One day, he happened to see a demonstration of the French Voisin flying machine. It was a beautiful biplane, a fragile little box with three delicately attached bicycle wheels. The aviator would lift it above the racetrack, fly it in a circle, and then land it on the infield. The next day, this feat was described in detail in the newspapers. Houdini didn't hesitate long. Within a week, he had a brand-new Voisin. Of course, it cost him five thousand dollars, but... The complete set included a French mechanic who taught the art of flying. Houdini adapted an army parade ground outside the city for the purpose. Incidentally, in every country where he ever performed, he always got along well with the military. Soldiers everywhere, incidentally, adored him. Every morning, he would go to the parade ground, climb into his Voisin, and the Frenchman would lecture him on the functions of the various levers and pedals. The airplane was steered by a large steering wheel, mounted vertically and attached by its stem to the rudder. The pilot sat on a small seat between the two wings. Behind him was the engine, and behind the engine, the propeller. The Voisin was made of wood, and the wings were covered with taut, varnished fabric. The struts connecting the double wings were also covered in the same fabric. The whole thing resembled a kite. Houdini ordered his name to be written in capital letters on both the upper and lower wings.
  5. +3
    10 August 2026 15: 53
    Hmm. Actually, comparing modern pilots with those of the past is unfair. Modern fighters come with their own set of risks. Modern pilots face enormous workloads in flight: high speeds, rapidly changing conditions, high G-forces during maneuvering, a huge amount of instrument information, and the need to make decisions very quickly. In this regard, early aviation pilots are mere children compared to modern pilots. Yet the risks haven't diminished at all. Decompression, perceptual illusions, loss of consciousness due to G-forces, equipment failure, and loss of control of the aircraft don't make the job of a modern military pilot any safer or more comfortable. If a pilot is shot down, their chances of survival are no higher than during World War I, despite ejection seats and recovery systems.
    Firstly, pilots experience high G-forces during ejection and are often discharged due to health reasons. Secondly, during World War I, there was at least some "gentlemanliness" between the warring parties. A successful landing usually offered honorable capture, respect, and sometimes even film awards to the pilot. Now, they face ground fire, torture and abuse after landing, and quite possibly a painful death or public humiliation.