Tiger vs. Lynx

40 458 13
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Kudeyar
    -1
    28 December 2010 21: 38
    Here it becomes clear that furniture makers should not be involved in military reforms. Selling creatures. Probably a good kickback was received from the Italians.
  2. Tankist
    Tankist
    0
    28 December 2010 23: 00
    To drive Russia into NATO, the stool will not only be bought by the attendants, but by the M4s in the place of Kalash, it will be inserted.
  3. Victor
    Victor
    0
    29 December 2010 01: 28
    The Russian leadership seems to have headed for integration with NATO. Otherwise, what else can explain the literally treacherous policy pursued by the top leadership of Russia and the RF Ministry of Defense, aimed at acquiring a Western military hardware that is inferior to the Russian, and moreover, practically understaffed (such as the same Mistral - essentially a steel bank). Stalin is still lacking ...
    It is incomprehensible to me, a civilian, why KAMAZ, having paid the money for two Italian armored cars and becoming their owner, should stand at attention and obey the Italians' ban on undermining the armored car? The armored car is now ours, what we want is what we do with it. In general, the end of Russia is not far, and we will purchase ballistic intercontinental missiles for our Strategic Rocket Forces from amers.
  4. Alexander
    0
    29 December 2010 11: 02
    Of course, in NATO and forward against China and Afghanistan. And something else is said about the revival of Russia.
  5. Sergei
    -1
    30 December 2010 01: 09

    Come on.

    And on the UDC, and on the UAV, and on iveko - the solutions are quite
    reasonable, sound, and most importantly predictable.

    The Italian is indeed better protected than the Tiger.
    And it looks more aesthetically pleasing.

    I generally believe that reorientation to procurement
    Western technology is inevitable.

    France and Germany are naturally best suited for this.
  6. Jury
    +1
    30 December 2010 12: 58
    Previous commentator, are you friends with your head? Have you read the article or not? What aesthetics? Sit in this car and let it be shot with a machine gun, how do you sing then? When this is over - Russian designers produce revolutionary models of equipment, foreigners are immediately interested in them, try to buy, immediately initiate the development of such equipment at home, and the Moscow Region does not even bother to buy this equipment for the army? As was the case with the tank support machine, for example.
  7. Kostya
    0
    1 January 2011 02: 33
    The answer is simple: iveco is Berlusconi’s property, Berlusconi is Putin’s friend
  8. Slipfar
    +1
    7 January 2011 14: 54
    One of the best military articles I've ever read.
    But it's a pity for our army. They'll have to ride this crap, while officials and higher "military" ranks
    rake back kickbacks and make money from a 30 billionth contract.
  9. Antosh
    +1
    8 January 2011 19: 01
    Shameful wolves! History repeats itself since tsarist times.In the course of World War I, Russian swindlers "bought" huge quantities of shells in France with a guaranteed shelf life of 1 years, and the "allys" slipped a marriage. The chambers of the shutters. Bitch, everything is for sale. And the life of soldiers and the honor of the country. I’m talking about today's wolves. Vissarionych is not for this bastard!
  10. Vladimir
    +1
    9 January 2011 21: 19
    The top for money is selling the Motherland like this! Blah blah blah about the needs and aspirations of the people, the safety of life of our soldiers, but in reality they fill their pockets and provide a bright future for their descendants. The Russian budget will survive everything, at last, we will cut it off from doctors and teachers. Konchno Putin and Berlusconi are friends, so good friendship is reinforced by good bablos. It is disgusting to be aware of all this, but apart from expressing our opinion here we cannot do anything.
  11. CARTRIDGE
    0
    11 June 2011 17: 26
    SORRY !!!
  12. ewgen2012ew
    +1
    16 September 2012 11: 21
    Yes, an incompetent bastard in this MO, filthy creatures stop
  13. Grifon)))
    +1
    28 December 2012 20: 35
    Friends, why are you so pessimistic? Our government simply underestimates our car, although in fact, our model surpasses this hyped Iveco at once. Personally, I really liked the article, and I am sure that everything described in it is true. I especially liked the example with the car. It is no secret that this is our VAZ 2101, which we borrowed from these Italians and how we gave them a car modified by our Soviet designers, which was then sold in Italy as their modification. I repeat once again, the article is wonderful. Thanks to the author. I am waiting for articles in the same direction.
  14. TeR
    TeR
    0
    8 January 2015 14: 41
    Great article. Could put 10 pluses - would put. It is a pity that she does not have an author. bully