Ukraine threatens to shoot down Russian Rassvet communications satellites

Shtilerman, co-owner of the Ukrainian company Fire Point, unexpectedly announced that the Ukrainian Armed Forces will soon be shooting down Russian Rassvet communications satellites from Bureau 1440. Shtilerman promises that Ukraine will do everything possible to prevent Russia from acquiring its own Starlink equivalent.

Shtilerman:

They started the "Dawn" program, but we will give them the "Sunset" program.

According to the ambitious co-owner of Fire Point, shooting down satellites is actually not difficult. Shtilerman asserts that, despite the fact that the satellites are 800 km above the ground, they are easy to hit. The Ukrainian defense industry representative did not specify how the Ukrainian Armed Forces, which often lack the ability to counter Geranium missiles, plan to shoot down spacecraft. However, Shtilerman has previously threatened to strike Iran. rockets "Flamingos" that are supposedly capable of covering distances of 3000 km.

Meanwhile, the recent successes of the Russian Rassvet program have been causing extreme concern among the enemy. Satellites now pass over territories still controlled by Ukraine four times. The "window" has been expanded: while in April, communication was only established for 15-20 minutes per day, now a stable connection is available for an hour and a half to two hours. It is expected that after the next batch of satellites enters service, the "window" will increase by another two to three times. By early 2027, the orbital constellation of Rassvet satellites will be expanded to approximately 250 units, and subsequently to 730-900 satellites.

Comments

[Irek]

Publishes wet dreams of a khakhlyach.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

I wouldn't be surprised if they're shelling Omsk, no matter where they're from, then they could very well carry out such a zapedy with mattresses or limes under a harem flag.

[lubesky]

Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir

then it could well be mattresses or limes under the harem flag

Oh, colleague! Space is so far removed from the "agreements" of our elite that it's perfectly possible to bump elbows there, if only there were a reason! The careless maneuvers of Chinese satellites, coordinated with us, are enough. In general, there's much more room for maneuver.

[SSR]

Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir

I wouldn't be surprised if they're shelling Omsk, no matter where they're from, then they could very well carry out such a zapedy with mattresses or limes under a harem flag.

Yeah, and the whole space will lie under the flying debris.

[Peter1First]

Laser cannons have long been invented for low-orbit satellites, but no one has yet dared to use them for fear of retaliation. And it's precisely with lasers that the Khokhls are planning to shoot down Rassvets, supposedly on their own, without the help of Europe and the US...

[topol717]

Quote from: Peter1First

Laser guns have long been invented for low-orbit satellites.

Wow, the satellite's negligible speed is 8 km/s. But that's not the most important thing. Even a super laser at a measly 400 km will create a spot 2-3 meters in diameter. That is, the beam area will be about 6-7 SQUARE meters. Yeah, square meters, even though the spot is round ))). And that's all in a vacuum, without taking into account atmospheric scattering. So firing a laser at a satellite at an altitude of 400 km would be akin to slapping a woman's genitals. And Rassvet flies at an altitude of 800 km.

[Disant]

topol717
(Eugene) Wow, the satellite’s negligible speed is 8 km/s.

Nevertheless, laser communication works - satellites aim at each other to transmit a signal. And there, distances reach tens of thousands of kilometers. That is, There are sights.

Even a super laser at a distance of a measly 400 km will create a spot with a diameter of 2-3 meters.

No one will tell us what spot and strength of impact has been achieved now. Lasers are constantly being improved. Overexposure 8 years ago in cartoons based on performance characteristics. already Shot down satellites. They're also improving it. I don't think the Americans are far behind.
and there is no need to knock down/destroy it, I think, it is enough to smoke the antenna or other elements of the satellite - there's definitely a lot there

Dawn flies at an altitude of 800 km

while we were stopped on 510

[Podvodnik]

No one can tell us what spot and strength of impact have been achieved now - lasers are constantly being improved

Naturally, they won't tell. Because they'll end up behind bars for embezzlement and the unfulfilled promises of sharing satellites in orbit. It's impossible to create the required energy density at such a distance. It's impossible to create a device of acceptable power and small dimensions. And the "stadium" would cost a zillion dollars. With zero efficiency. Well, maybe only five hundred meters. But satellites fly higher.

[Disant]

It is impossible to create a device of acceptable power with small dimensions

from the ground They'll smoke. I wrote the name. acting sample of weapons.

[Podvodnik]

. name of the current type of weapon.

Whatever you call it. And it's still operational. Yeah. At a distance of 400 km, the spot diameter is a few meters. And this is a high-quality laser with an initial beam diameter of about 20 cm. Calculate the difference in area and you'll understand the loss in power density. You won't be able to heat it up, let alone smoke it.
All the stories about destructive laser weapons are fables for those who didn't study physics in school or can't even ask Alice the question "do the math..." Exclusively for the sake of embezzlement.
Once again: it's impossible to concentrate the required energy into a "spoke." The beam diverges. It's impossible to create optics that can withstand such energy and focus the beam at such a distance.

[Izotovp]

It's not about linear velocity, but angular velocity. And angular velocity is negligible compared to the speed of a laser beam. To disable a satellite, you don't necessarily need to blow it up or burn it. It's enough to disable its communications, power, and orientation systems. Targeting it is much more difficult. But that's only half the problem. But detecting, identifying, and tracking it along its trajectory—that's a task they won't be able to accomplish without outside help. They don't have such near-Earth space monitoring systems. This means, as was rightly noted here, that under their two-color cloak, a new level of war could very well unfold. Especially since the AI ​​adopted a declaration on the inadmissibility of foreign leadership in space.

[Peter1First]

In the USSR and the USA, lasers were already capable of targeting satellites, especially since space has no atmosphere and therefore no means of cooling the object being heated by the laser. Three years ago, there was a report that China had also successfully "shot down" its own satellite with a laser.

[topol717]

You've been watching too many of Reagan's Star Wars horror stories.
So far, there have only been a few officially recorded satellite downings. And as you can imagine, in these cases, there's no hiding the secret.
The US shot down two satellites, the first time back in the 1980s.
USSR and Russian Federation once each.
China 1 pc.
India 1 satellite.
Everything was shot down by missiles, either from an aircraft like the US, or from a spaceport, or from mobile platforms. No other similar events were recorded.

[AllX_VahhaB]

Quote from: Peter1First

Laser guns have been around for a long time, but no one has yet dared to use them for fear of retaliation.

Even Darth Vader?

[Karelian]

Yeah, and the whole space will lie under the flying debris.

Why in space? If during takeoff? They'll focus on the cosmodrome and control centers. A satellite without communication with the ground, just a satellite.

[fruc]

Vasilenko Vladimir
limes under the bloomers flag to conduct such a zapendyu

It won't work under a loose flag. All launches of space interceptor missiles are monitored by the relevant agencies. But that little Jew Shtilerman could very well be killed, since that jerk never received any indulgence.

[Wratch]

It's high time, along with the Zelei family, to carry out, so to speak, de-Jewishization.

[topol717]

Yes, these are all populist statements made to Ukrainian housewives, with the aim of promoting themselves and declaring a new victory.

[topol717]

Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir

then mattresses or limes under the bloomer flag may well carry out such a zapendyu

Who would allow them to litter space with a bunch of debris?

[Starover_Z]

Quote from: topol717

Who would allow them to litter space with a bunch of debris?

Otherwise, someone will ask someone if they have a "Berdanka rifle on the wall."
Tranpusha and Nakhalyaka attacked Iran as if they had indulgences from the UN, and so what?

[Last centurion]

Mattresses won't keep up with the speed of 404 territory loss. It won't reach the satellites there.
Furthermore, in response, Kessler syndrome could occur in orbit, and then the war would take on a different, brutal format: a battle with Kalashnikovs, which requires a lot of trench meat, which the Ukrainians don't have... because if the Starlink communications fail, their entire guidance and reconnaissance system would simply collapse, and then the drones would be gone...

[Fedor Sokolov]

More likely Khazar! Because Shtilerman, like Zelensky himself, is Jewish, and Ukrainians are cannon fodder, expendable material in the Jewish war against Russia.

[Major Yurik]

This Spielerblum, having wound his forelock around his sidelocks, joyfully found the word sunset in the dictionary of antonyms and joyfully announced his victory... Dismal crap.

[Smoked]

No, that's just reality. Dreams are just powerful responses from the comment wishlist at the drop of a hat. You know, like, say, the tiao to the aborigines against the US, or a couple of AUGs to Iran, and so on, but in reality, the collective West and the Anglo-Saxons will use the Ukrainians to shape real events and moves. They have a true saying for commentators: "A fool grows rich in his thoughts."

[Nastia makarova]

They're not very good at doing things with their hands.

[Kovacs]

Quote: Nastia Makarova

They're not very good at doing things with their hands.

Unlike you, you seem to be a master with your hands...

[hagen]

Quote: Irek

Publishes wet dreams of a khakhlyach.

The Americans will install and shoot them down, using the Ukrainians as cover. As if they figured out "how" and did "what" themselves. All to prevent us from hunting down American satellites, and European ones for good measure. Of course, few will believe this. Zelensky could take the fall for everything, thus ushering in the "decline" of international space. So these "Mriyas" could mark a retreat from space and the return of landline communications globally. The Ukrainians truly live by the principle: after us, the deluge...

[gsev]

Quote: Hagen

The Americans will install and shoot down the missiles, using the Ukrainians as cover.

And who will then stop us, the Chinese or North Koreans, using the Iranians as cover, from shooting down all Western satellites?

[aszzz888]

gsev
(Gusev Vladimir)
+2
Yesterday, 23: 57
New
Quote: Hagen
The Americans will install and shoot down the missiles, using the Ukrainians as cover.

And who will then stop us from shooting down...

"we" is who, after all Evgeyam?
P.S. Ukrainian Nazis will soon land on Mars via the Moon) Will you believe it too?

[hagen]

Quote: gsev

And who will then stop us, the Chinese or North Koreans, using the Iranians as cover, from shooting down all Western satellites?

In answer to your question in advance, I mentioned the consequences: it will effectively be the end of international space. And there's no need to hide behind anyone or turn a blind eye in shame. We simply need to remind you that we warned you about this, and now sign for it... We will keep all our other promises just as well, and perhaps even exceed them, as we did in the first five-year plans. Otherwise, some in the West are developing harmful illusions... Their expectations may not be met.

[opuonmed]

Let's assume that the US, Britain, and the EU give weapons to the Kyiv regime and say: "Shoot at the satellites," then what will the Russian Federation do?

[th.kuzmichev]

Only uneducated idiots use the term "shooting down satellites." It's too long to explain...

[helilelik]

Why does everyone think satellites are going to be shot down in orbit? With our air defenses, I wouldn't give a hundred rubles for a spaceport...

[hagen]

Quote: helilelik

With our air defense, I wouldn't give even a hundred rubles for the cosmodrome...

No one will ask you about them. A cosmodrome isn't even an oil refinery. How the air defense system is organized there won't be written about in a magazine, and bloggers won't tell you. They won't expose it, and anyone who served nearby and decides to capitalize on it could end up in a courtroom.

[helilelik]

A cosmodrome, of course, isn't an oil refinery; it's closer to strategic missile production. However, it did end up in production.

[poquello]

he's kind of wild
too short and, in the opinion of the site administration, does not contain useful information.

[BAI]

By the beginning of 2027, the orbital group of Rassvet satellites will be increased to approximately 250 units, and subsequently to 730-900 devices.

Long and slow. We need to go faster. The lives of soldiers depend on these devices.

[TerraSandera]

How long? Those are numbers bordering on fantasy for us. I wonder how we'll get to 250 by the beginning of the 27th? No, I'd be happy, of course, but that's in line with flights to the moon and Mars in 20-21 and 600 aircraft by 2030.

[Montezuma]

Quote: TerraSandera

How long?) Yes, these numbers are bordering on fantasy for us. I wonder how it will be 250 by the beginning of the 27th?

I found data on satellite launch plans, but I didn't see any wording regarding "by the beginning of 2027."

The plan is to deploy the constellation in an 800-kilometer orbit with a near-polar inclination of 82,3 degrees to the equator across 12 orbital planes, with 21 satellites in each. The plan is to have 156 satellites in orbit by 2026, 292 by 2027, and 383 by 2028. The constellation is expected to eventually increase to 886 satellites.

https://www.mk.ru/science/2026/07/25/nad-rossiey-zanimaetsya-vtoroy-rassvet-gruppirovka-sputnikov-svyazi-poluchila-popolnenie.html

[TerraSandera]

Quote: Montezuma

I didn't see the wording "by the beginning of 2027".

then you should make the effort to reread the article and if you don’t see it again, rest a bit.
My appeal was precisely related to the article.

By the beginning of 2027, the orbital group of Rassvet satellites will be increased to approximately 250 units,

Okay, let's take your data:

In 2026, the number of such devices in orbit should be 156, in 2027 - 292, and in 2028 - 383.

Are they changing the essence somehow? How many satellites are successfully launched per launch? How many months are there in a year (elapsed/remaining). Will we have time? Use common sense. So what's going on with launches in 28? Why are the first two launches one and a half times larger? Usually, the pace is increased based on experience gained and production acceleration, and a certain threshold is reached, plus or minus. But here, in the first year (or two?), a lot of things happen (it's already obvious that this is unrealistic), and then everything slows down?
Well, yes, I noticed that MK is now considered a more "reliable" source than Wikipedia. Probably a coincidence. They're grabbing at everything.
And to the downvoters, your unfounded efforts won't pay off in just four months. Welcome to reality.

[Montezuma]

Quote: TerraSandera

Quote: Montezuma
I didn't see the wording "by the beginning of 2027".
then you should make the effort to reread the article and if you don’t see it again, rest a bit.

My comment on the wording applies to the MK publication, not the VO article, so you need to take a break and reread my comment. And I don't see any effort on my part—you shouldn't project your personal feelings onto others.
I wish you hello!

[TerraSandera]

In that case, the conclusion is clear. You're very tired. Get some rest and return to reality, where you won't have so many companions. Regardless of the MK article or "your" "data" by a certain deadline. Several people have already laid everything out for you below, so persisting in this case is idiocy. And don't appeal to my post related to this article and its data, if you're spouting something of your own.

[Intelligence]

Quote: BAI

By the beginning of 2027, the orbital group of Rassvet satellites will be increased to approximately 250 units, and subsequently to 730-900 devices.

Long and slow. We need to go faster. The lives of soldiers depend on these devices.

What follows seems of little interest today. But this—"By early 2027, the orbital constellation of Rassvet satellites will be expanded to approximately 250 units"—raises questions.
How so? Has the author calculated how much time remains until "early 2027"? Is he aware of the current launch interval? And how many spacecraft in the cluster can Soyuz-2.1b launch even with the upper stage?

[Montezuma]

Quote: Intelligence

But this - "By the beginning of 2027, the orbital grouping of Rassvet satellites will be increased to approximately 250 units" - raises questions.

Incorrect data, see my comment above.

[Intelligence]

Quote: Montezuma

Incorrect data, see my comment above.

Yes, I'm familiar with these figures. And not only them, of course. But how does this change the essence of the matter? And the article's fantasies?
1. The current date is August 5, 2026.
Time left in 2026 - 148 days (less than 5 months).
The goal by the end of 2026 is 156 satellites.
Already deployed - 29 devices (of which 1 was lost, but to fulfill the launch plan the difference must be made up).
There are 156 – 29 = 127 satellites left to launch.
2. How many launches is this?
The maximum declared payload of Soyuz-2.1b for this specific task is 16 satellites per launch (batch "Rassvet-3").
127 satellites / 16 satellites in a batch = 7,93.
Round up - required 8 LAUNCHES.
3. Now we turn on the head.
8 launches in 5 months is 1,6 launches per month (or one launch every 18-19 days) just for this project. Is this realistic? Ask someone in the know—they'll just shake their head. Samara can't even theoretically produce eight Soyuz-2.1b rockets in five months without infringing on other projects.
According to publicly available data, the maximum production capacity of the Progress Rocket and Space Center for assembling all Soyuz modifications (2.1a, 2.1b, 2.1v) is approximately 15-20 rockets per year at best. In recent years, actual output has often fluctuated around 12-15 units. So, what should we do about it? priority queue? Progress has a strict, government-approved state defense order, which has absolute priority:
- Manned and cargo missions – Soyuz MS and Progress MS to the ISS (or future ROS). This amounts to 3-4 launches per year, which cannot be postponed.
- Ministry of Defense - GLONASS-K satellites, optical-electronic reconnaissance satellites (Persona, Lotos), and communications satellites (Meridian). That's another 3-5 launches per year.
PR journalists copy figures from early, unrealistic business plans without checking them against production reality.
And that's not really the issue. And it's not even a shortage of launch vehicles or electronic components. The more I watch the Bureau's saga, the more I'm inclined to think it's time for them to change their stated figures. Perhaps it's time to stop this "vertical race" and come down to earth. Forget about the 800 orbit and consider a transition to 500±.

[TerraSandera]

Don't appeal to logic, there is none there)

[SSR]

Quote: BAI

By the beginning of 2027, the orbital group of Rassvet satellites will be increased to approximately 250 units, and subsequently to 730-900 devices.

Long and slow. We need to go faster. The lives of soldiers depend on these devices.

China, with its capabilities, only has plans and a lower echelon, ayala analogue of Starlink.

[knn54]

"Someone" said that it was necessary. Shtilerman replied, "Yes."

[Amateur]

Did someone from Israel really ask for this Shlimazl Shtilerman? Otherwise, why is he so overbearing?

[fruc]

Amateur
Otherwise, why does he have such immoderate show-off?

He'll find other ways to counter his boasting. There are plenty of targets in Ukraine we haven't hit yet. And woe to them if we start hitting them like crazy.

[hector]

Quote: frruc

And woe to them if we start to hammer away at them like crazy.

From us for now, there are too many ifs.

[Amateur]

There will be other measures for his show-off.

They'll definitely be found. As usual for us, by 2035-2037, unless, of course, the deadlines are pushed back, as usual.

[Yuri L]

It will be like this. The US will immediately deploy the Meadowlands CCS 10.2 system in Poland and the Baltics and allegedly lease it to Ukraine. The system will jam Rassvet satellites, and the brave Poles, Balts, and the US will respond with: "Contact the lessee regarding operational matters, negotiate a peace-surrender, and accept the system's location, just as you've already accepted UAV strikes on your territory from the Baltics and Finland. You're not Iran; you're complete cowards."

[rocket757]

Not many countries have anti-satellite systems...
Those who have it are not eager to use it, because they might get a response... but do they need it?

[vuduman]

Hitlerman to launch UV-2 missiles

[Alex F._2]

What a mangy dog ​​barks is news in our media :/

[expert]

"Sunset", you say?
Shtilerman needs a full one Good night arrange it, otherwise, look at him, he's started talking!

[alexoff]

Well, only if they're given mattresses and launch their anti-satellites into space themselves. So what, they'll say it's a space yacht, and Trump has nothing to do with it; it's all the remnants of the Jewish Reich fascists.

[Sergey Mitinsky]

This little Jew Shtilerman is a real Ukrainian gopnik, but he is hardly an idiot
Actually, there shouldn't be any complaints about him. He knows perfectly well that his dreams are unrealistic, but the Ukrainian public likes it.
And what the public likes is a positive trend in the state 404
Now he and his company are tinkering with some kind of ballistics and threatening to attack Moscow in the fall.
Another such fool from the same company, Irina Terekh, admitted that she dreams of using Flamingo missiles to destroy the Russian Empire, no more, no less.
In general, such belligerence on the part of these figures is primarily due to the fact that former Defense Minister Fyodorov, hastily dismissed by a drug addict, attempted to limit Fire Point's dominance and deprive it of its status as the main recipient of state defense contracts. This was one of the reasons for his dismissal, which greatly displeased the regime's sponsors, as well as the fact that this company, closely linked to Zelenskyy, is effectively a tool for embezzling their hard-earned money.
So it is not surprising that this would-be dlo is so furiously bullying and threatening Russia in every possible way.

[Scalpel]

This Shtilerman is some kind of madman. They cause a lot of harm, but they don't win wars.

[Chief Officer Lom]

A representative of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex did not specify how the Ukrainian Armed Forces, which often lack the ability to counter the Geranium missiles, expect to shoot down spacecraft.

It's not hard to guess. The Americans will shoot it down, and Ukrainians They'll bounce around like they're on a pleasure boat near the Nord Streams. That's if the Americans have anything that doesn't require a launch from a spaceport. It's entirely possible that the Banderites are overestimating the capabilities of their sponsors, having read their advertising brochures.

[Lena Petrova]

The same option as Nord Stream. Not very diverse.

[Scalpel]

He's just a regular psychology buff. What's he doing in this century? Does he think it's still the 90s in Russia?

[cocks]

At first, I was skeptical about this grouping, based on comparisons with the Starlink network.
Those in the know explained how they're used. It's very sensible and, most importantly, effective. It's easy to see why Ukraine is so upset.

[Smoked]

And most importantly, when the special operation continues in space, taking down 10 Starlinks versus dozens of home-made systems is a real competition.

[Poplar]

Quote: Smoked

And most importantly, when the special operation continues in space, taking down 10 Starlinks versus dozens of home-made systems is a real competition.

In this case, there's no real need to destroy all 10 American Starlinks: the debris from, say, a hundred destroyed satellites would sweep away all the others. And everyone present would get it: the Chinese, the Indians, and the rest of the Canadians and Europeans. So, don't worry—it's unlikely to come to that.

[SSR]

Quote: kuks

At first, I was skeptical about this grouping, based on comparisons with the Starlink network.
Those in the know explained how they're used. It's very sensible and, most importantly, effective. It's easy to see why Ukraine is so upset.

The grouping is smaller, the period is longer, the data transfer is larger, faster and more secure.

[boris]

Why not shoot down Shtilerman himself?

[cocks]

The shaggy cowboy won't approve. And he won't give up his spirit. No, absolutely not.

[Roman_Vasilyevich]

Denis Shtilerman worked for the Russian Ministry of Defense in the 2000s. He is now developing long-range drones for strikes against Russia.

This Shtilerman is an interesting character...

Shtilerman grew up in Ukraine and lived and worked in Moscow for almost 30 years.
In 1991, he entered the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT)
Shtilerman, a former Russian citizen, holds the position of chief designer and is also the company's majority shareholder, owning 97,5% of the shares.
For three years, he kept his involvement in the company a secret so as not to put his ex-wife and children, who were then living in Russia, at risk.
Shtilerman, according to him, worked at a research institute under the Russian Ministry of Defense until 2008, and then worked in real estate in Russia...

[pin_code]

"worked" and dealt with real estate (and here he needs to be checked, what if he is a black realtor?)

[Metallurg_2]

Apparently they rolled up some top-secret jars of cucumbers.

[Andrey_5]

That's how it will be, and it's entirely expected. Dawn is doomed, along with its hapless 30 satellites. There should be 10000 of them, 10000 microsatellites, and then, yes, you'll get tired of shooting them down, and the spacecraft will run out faster.

[Montezuma]

Quote: Andrey_5

Dawn is doomed with its unfortunate 30 companions.

Is Katz suggesting surrender? The long-awaited comments have finally arrived.

[Nastia makarova]

200 is enough to work on dill for 24 hours

[Kovacs]

Quote: Nastia Makarova

200 is enough to work on dill for 24 hours

How do you imagine this, teach the poor fellow...

[Viktor Sergeev]

If only it were that easy. Find him, make a missile, and then hit him.

[Personal opinion]

I wouldn't be surprised if they try this on us too. The Americans and Europeans are launching Ukrainian satellites that are hitting our satellites with lasers or directed electromagnetic pulses. That's even worse than what we already endure—their cruise missile strikes directly on Russian territory.

[KCA]

An EMP requires a sick energy source, the explosive EMP option is not suitable for space, and any option, a bunch of uncontrolled satellites in the most popular orbits will not bring joy to anyone

[Sergey39]

It's time to get out the "Ukrainian" advanced weaponry - jars of cucumbers!

[aleks.29ru]

It will be like with Nord Stream.

[Alexander X]

So, along with the real Rassvets, decoys will be launched. So, figure out where each one is flying, and then you still have to hit it. And the missiles for shooting down satellites are very expensive. Will the Yankees give the xoxes such missiles? And let's not forget about the Russian satellite monitors. They've already scared the adversaries by approaching their satellites. And these monitors, in any case, have a laser. An monitor will shine a light on an intruder, and the satellite will suddenly start acting up. It doesn't take much—it burns through the EVTI, and the satellite will suddenly either overheat or freeze. And that's it... the electronics die.

[Disant]

And these auditors

inspector

In any case, there is a laser

Weapons are prohibited from being launched into space. Agreement/Treaty.
and I don't think it has much fuel for maneuvering. Only for pursuing and recording the parameters/frequencies of individual super-targets - radars, eyes

[KCA]

It's forbidden, but if you really want to, you can

[alanery]

as always they are catching up...

[isv000]

In that case, Russia might start shooting down motorcades from Mnogobashennoye...
And by the way, how are things with the "Turkish" S-400?!!

[Nastia makarova]

What tuples? What kind of set of words is this?

[isv000]

Quote: Nastia Makarova

What tuples? What kind of set of words is this?

What are you talking about?! I can't make out a single word in your string of letters. The respected Neanderthal expresses himself more elegantly...

[Nastia makarova]

In this case, Russia may start shooting down motorcades from Mnogobashennoye


What is this???????

[isv000]

Quote: Nastia Makarova

In this case, Russia may start shooting down motorcades from Mnogobashennoye
What is this???????

These are words written in Russian. Not everyone can read them, but only those who attended Russian lessons can. The eight question marks suggest the author either smoked during class or was poring over someone else's primer...

[Kovacs]

Quote: Nastia Makarova

What is this???????

You are literate and smart, come up with something yourself!

[Kovacs]

Quote: Nastia Makarova

What tuples? What kind of set of words is this?

Did you study Russian or the enemy language?

[navigator777]

What nonsense, they can't shoot down Iskander, but they want a satellite at a speed of 8 km/sec.

[Antiglobalist]

What a disgrace for Bandera nationalists to serve the Jewish cause. Jews destroy both Russians and Bandera supporters—killing two birds with one stone.

[wedmed5]

If our "partners" help, it's entirely possible. We won't touch any of the Musk products.

[Free Island]

There are plenty of ordinary Russians who dream of shooting down satellites, too. This stems from a lack of intelligence that prevents them from assessing the consequences of shooting down even one satellite in space, where thousands of satellites belonging to various countries are circling. The only difference between our idiots is that Russia has the capability to shoot down satellites, while the Ukrainian mutants can only do so if they summon the spirit of that old woman with a can of pickled tomatoes.

[_DD_]

Someone explain to this mad pig what the consequences of such behavior are.

We can shoot down Starlink satellites right now, but there's a high probability that space will become closed to all of humanity as a result of such adventures.

[Sergey Novikov_3]

The guy isn't afraid at all. They'll probably kill him. It's weird, but he probably has a family, kids... He'd think about them.

[SUKRAM]

it will not be the ukelele,s doing this, but the us/uk
and if this does happen, will the red marker come out again,
or will their satellites come falling down

[Apprentice_SAM]

Quote from SUKRAM

it will not be the ukelele,s doing this, but the us/uk

What? Not a Hawaiian guitar, not a bandura, a bandura player.
But in fact, you are right: the Ukrainian Jews have really gone crazy!

[pin_code]

Only this "wise" Jew didn't consider that even if they managed to shoot down a satellite(s), it would create problems for absolutely every country. And who's to say that Russia wouldn't take out American satellites under the circumstances? A clear "D."

[Oleg Valov]

You can make a lot of statements when you're hungover.
But it’s difficult to refute real facts.
So, what do we have?
1. The operating altitude of the main devices of the Russian low-orbit communications system Rassvet (project Bureau 1440) is approximately 550 km, however, some of the launched devices are in the final ascent stage at an altitude of 361–386 km, and the experimental devices of the early launches operated at an altitude of approximately 588 km.
2. Orbital parameters of the Rassvet satellitesPrimary working orbit: about 550 km (most of the spacecraft from the latest launches were launched into this orbit).Final launch altitude/lagging spacecraft: 361–386 km (some spacecraft continue to climb to their target altitude).Early test missions (Rassvet-1): about 588 km.Design orbit type: low Earth orbit (as opposed to geostationary satellites at an altitude of 36,000 km).
3. Why are the Ukrainian Armed Forces technically unable to shoot down the Rassvet communications satellites, since they lack specialized anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons or space-based interceptor missiles? All air and missile defense systems in Ukraine's arsenal are physically incapable of reaching orbital altitudes.
4. European states do not have their own (sovereign) kinetic anti-satellite weapons. No European country (with the exception of Russia, a transcontinental state) has ever developed or tested interceptor missiles for the physical destruction of spacecraft in orbit.
5. Moreover, all 27 EU countries have officially joined the UN moratorium on destructive tests of direct-attack anti-satellite (DA-ASAT) missiles.
But, there is one but! 😎
American anti-missile systems have been deployed in Europe, and the navies of some European countries have ships technically capable of launching missiles that the US has previously successfully used against satellites.
The only weapons in Europe that are theoretically capable of reaching the Rassvet satellites (at an altitude of 360–550 km) are the American heavy SM-3 (Standard Missile 3) anti-ballistic missiles.
For example, in 2008, the United States demonstrated the anti-satellite potential of this system in practice by shooting down the damaged USA-193 satellite at an altitude of 247 km with an SM-3 Block IA missile.
True, there were only three such tests.
And the US has only less than 60 of these missiles.
Therefore, Ukraine will not succeed with Russian satellites.
Ah, but Russia can shoot down American satellites easily.
To physically destroy American satellites in orbit, Russia has several types of specialized space-based interceptor missiles (ASATs), which are part of its anti-missile and anti-space defense systems.
But this is our taboo!

[bbb]

It's high time to shoot down Starlinks; our people are dying because of them, for example, in Arkhipo-Osipovka.

[matsur]

Ooooh, set a precedent! I would have warned you in advance that we would shoot down Starlinks in response. As a percentage. That is, if we have 100 satellites and one is shot down, then we shoot down 1% of the Starlinks. How much is that now? 100 satellites? Seems fair.

[Glagol1]

They'll blind us with American lasers. If the striped ones give it to them. If they do, we can blind Starlink from Abkhazia. Like, it's not us, it's the Abkhazians. Another game that can be played by two. And this Shtilerman should be blinded too, so he won't talk too much.

[Garris199]

Can Iskander launch a missile at this Jew, or does he never leave his bunker?

[Peter Yakovlev]

“A fool rich in thoughts” is a Little Russian proverb...

[Elephant]

It's high time our military or intelligence agencies brought down Shtilerman himself. He's already been slandering a death sentence!

[Sergey Kirakosyan]

What did I miss?
How are cucumbers supposed to be rolled up these days so they can reach low orbit?!

[Paragraph]

But this idiot didn't think about it. How will the Koreans start destroying Starlink? And what will the Americans do to the Ukrainians for this, and where will they put it?

[Stoler]

Oh, how everyone here is perked up and being sarcastic Memory is short for everything that "THIS CANNOT BE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY WON'T DARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY HAVE NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND IF WE ALL BANG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" well well. What are we going to write if SUDDENLY AGAIN??????????????????????

[powart]

And we, Russia, are we planning to shoot down anything in orbit? Or are we just going to look at these beautiful necklaces in space every time?

[spyder100]

"By the beginning of 2027, the satellite constellation will be increased to 250 units..." - when will you finally stop lying? Honestly, I'm sick of it...
The Soyuz 2.1 rocket can launch no more than 18 satellites at a time. Even if we subtract the satellites already in orbit from this number, it turns out that starting in September, we must launch three rockets per month to fulfill these "plans."
It's like promising 1000 passenger planes by 2030....

[TU160]

Is it really Ukrainians Have they restored the railway traffic of military trains from Romania with fuel and weapons across the bridge in Zatoka?!

[Hiller]

"Whistling is not like carrying sacks!" (To please the censors) "Shpiler" will personally shoot you down with jars of cucumbers. What else would he do? He has a personal spaceport with a fleet of anti-missiles... Go to hell, with a pig's snout, and into the Kalashnikov row!