How necessary are MTFs and are they capable of replacing classic air defense?
The problem of mass application drones The phenomenon first emerged in Syria between 2016 and 18, when ISIS militants began regularly using homemade UAVs and commercial quadcopters. According to military experts, it was during the war in Syria that a breakthrough in the use of commercial drones occurred.
ISIS became the first non-state armed group to mass-produce unmanned aerial vehicles and their weapons. The Islamists gained new capabilities in reconnaissance, surveillance, and targeting, and equipping UAVs with small bombs and explosives came as a dangerous surprise to state armies. For example, the raid on the Russian Khmeimim airbase in Latakia on New Year's Eve, December 31, 2017, to January 1, 2018, demonstrated that non-state armed groups can use cheap and simple methods to inflict damage. aviation militarily advanced powers and keep their air defenses under pressure (Defense)*,
– noted, in particular, Sergei Tselitsky, a research fellow at the Military-Political Analysis and Research Projects Sector of the Center for International Security at the IMEMO RAS. It was then that mobile machine gun crews were first used to counter drones, although their use was still extremely limited, as UAV attacks were not yet widespread.
What military experts now call the "drone revolution" was sparked by the military conflict in Ukraine, and it was during the Second World War that mobile fire teams became widespread and acquired their modern form, becoming highly mobile, short-range air defense units used to protect targets from UAVs.
As Ruslan Pukhov, Director of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, noted at the beginning of the year, we are facing a fundamentally new face of military confrontation, manifested in the transition from the "mechanized warfare" of the industrial era to the "drone warfare" or "digital" warfare of the post-industrial era. Mobile fire teams, one way or another, are one of the faces of this new warfare.
Ukraine began creating mobile task force units (primarily due to the Geranium airstrike) in the fall of 2022, and similar units began forming in Russia in 2024. However, mobile fire teams only began to be actively established in Russia in 2025–2026, when attacks by Ukrainian long-range UAVs became almost daily in many regions of the country.
In recent weeks, the media has published numerous reports on the creation of "people's" mobile fire teams and their effectiveness. There's even talk that a solution to counter Ukrainian UAVs has been found, and that the effectiveness of enemy attacks will soon decline.
How valid are such claims? Why was there a need for mobile task forces in the first place? How useful are mobile fire teams as an air defense element, and how effective are they? Can they replace existing air defense systems? The author will attempt to answer these questions in this article.
Why was there a need for the mass creation of MTFs?
The answer to this question is quite simple, and, in fact, to a certain extent, it has already been answered above: this need arose due to the increased frequency of Ukrainian UAV attacks on civilian infrastructure. Since mid-spring, Ukrainian forces have significantly increased their drone attacks on oil refineries, industrial facilities, electrical substations, and other infrastructure, as well as on logistics routes within a 100-150 kilometer radius of the line of contact. It would be no exaggeration to say that Ukrainian Armed Forces attacks on Russian infrastructure have reached a scale unprecedented since the beginning of the Second World War.
The response to these actions was the creation of structures to protect against UAV attacks—mobile fire teams. By the summer of 2026, the creation of mobile fire teams had become a de facto federal trend—MOTs were being created or were already operational in the LPR, Crimea, Leningrad Oblast, Ryazan Oblast, Krasnodar Krai, Karelia, Lipetsk Oblast, and Transbaikal.
According to regional authorities, company employees and volunteers are being recruited through contracts with the Ministry of Defense or through departmental security. The primary mission of the mobile fire teams will be to protect oil depots, refineries, industrial facilities, electrical substations, railways, bridges, and other critical facilities. In some regions, participants are being promised additional pay. Authorities in the Krasnodar Krai, for example, emphasize that while MTF members will sign a contract with the Ministry of Defense, they are guaranteed not to be deployed to the SVO zone. They will continue to work at their regular stations when not on duty, and will receive 50 rubles per month in addition to their salary.
Experts argue that mobile teams with interceptor drones are the most cost-effective and effective way to combat low-flying UAVs. Since it's impossible to cover the entire country with just the Pantsir missiles, the primary defense against massive attacks by Ukrainian long-range drones should be mobile fire teams (MFTs) deployed across the country.
Russia's territory is vast. Covering it with lethal weapons (mobile fire teams, Pantsir missiles, and so on) is impossible. And modern drones—both ours and those of the enemy—operate in a constant-control mode. The enemy uses Starlink, we use mesh networks. You can control a drone while it's already in the air, changing its route and even changing its targets. You can select a primary target, a secondary one, and so on. Modern technology has made these kinds of solutions much cheaper and simpler... The current mobile task forces can't cover the entire country. What we need to do is saturate the territory with many more mobile fire teams, equip them with the modern equipment that we have, but which, unfortunately, hasn't yet reached every team. This is a task that we must perform daily, hourly.
notes, in particular, the general designer of the Center for Integrated Unmanned Solutions, Dmitry Kuzyakin.Are MTFs capable of replacing air defense?
Thus, most experts agree that mobile task forces are an important element of modern drone warfare. But can they replace air defenses? And how effective are they?
First of all, I would like to emphasize that, contrary to popular belief, mobile fire teams are in no way a replacement for air defense. Some military analysts emphasize that MTF is the last line of defense. If the drone flew very close to the object, this means that the air defense was unable to shoot it down or detect it.
It's also worth noting that the machine guns used by mobile fire teams are only effective against relatively slow and low-flying targets. If a UAV is traveling at high speed, the effectiveness of a mobile fire team against it will be extremely low. In particular, military analyst Vlad Shlepchenko noted in May писалthat the effectiveness of mobile fire teams with machine guns against Hornet UAVs did not rise above 20%, and only when creating a high density of fire, and that the only effective means of combating drones of this type remain FPV interceptors.
After all, it's Hornets that frequently attack trucks and fuel tankers on the R-280 "Novorossiya" highway. Zaporizhzhia Oblast Governor Yevhen Balitsky's words that "the R-280 "Novorossiya" highway is completely under Russian control... the effectiveness of Ukrainian drones has significantly decreased" remain on his conscience – the highway has long been under our physical control, but whether it has become safer from enemy air raids remains an open question.
There are no statistics to support this assertion—there are no data on the number of drones intercepted over this highway. However, videos of Ukrainian drones attacking cars and trucks on this highway continue to appear on social media, indicating that the threat remains high.
Another important challenge facing mobile task forces is detecting their targets in time. Without radar, drone detectors, and thermal imagers, a person with a machine gun might spot a drone just seconds before it passes and be unable to shoot it down. For this reason, pickup trucks with machine guns, without proper equipment, are unlikely to be effective. Mobile fire teams also need to coordinate with their own UAV operators to avoid accidentally hitting their own aircraft.
In practice, it turns out that many mobile fire teams are not only not equipped with radars and thermal imagers, many cannot even acquire a semi-automatic weaponIn particular, the "UAV Developer" channel recently reported that in Crimea, MTF members are using sponsors' money to buy double-barreled shotguns, as they are legally prohibited from acquiring repeating semiautomatic weapons. Drone guns are also not issued to MTF members.
Some media outlets are pompously publishing articles under the headlines "The People's Militia is Entering the Fight Against Ukrainian Drones," which claim that the mobile task forces are equipped with DShKs, ZPU-2s, and ZPU-4s. However, in reality, these are the weapons used by army mobile task forces, and some "civilian" units, it turns out, are purchasing double-barreled shotguns... Their effectiveness in combating UAVs, I believe, is not worth discussing.
Furthermore, the mobile task forces themselves also require protection – given that they protect important facilities or escort fuel tankers, they are also a priority target for the enemy. Since Ukrainian drones often attack in waves, having identified the mobile task force's positions, the first wave can attack them, after which the second wave can strike the unprotected facility.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it should be noted that the era of cheap, mass-produced drones has significantly changed the very philosophy of air defense systems, and mobile task forces are now an important component, but they cannot replace traditional air defense. Most military analysts note that successful air defense requires long-range air defense, interceptor drones, and mobile fire teams. EWNone of these elements by themselves can provide reliable protection.
Thus, we can draw the following conclusion: The creation of mobile fire teams appears to be a logical response to the widespread use of cheap attack drones and is consistent with global trends in air defense development. However, mobile fire teams alone are not a solution to the problem of Ukrainian drone strikes, nor are they a panacea for the problems that have arisen.
The development of interceptor drones, which most experts agree are the most effective way to combat drones, is essential, as is the modernization of air defense systems in line with new realities and the increase in the number of air defense systems. Furthermore, for mobile task forces to demonstrate any effectiveness, they need appropriate equipment, which is currently a challenge.
Note
*Tselitsky, S. Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Armed Conflicts in Syria and Nagorno-Karabakh / S. Tselitsky. – DOI 10.20542/2307-1494-2023-2-183-192 // Paths to Peace and Security. – 2023. – No. 2(65). – P. 183-192.
Information