On the 35th anniversary of the August events in the USSR

3 791 44
On the 35th anniversary of the August events in the USSR

The preconditions for the crisis and preparations for the August 1991 coup in the USSR had already been forming in the late 1980s. Tensions were mounting within the country, as republics declared sovereignty one after another. For example, on November 16, 1988, Estonia adopted a declaration of independence, followed by Lithuania on May 26, 1989. Furthermore, largely due to the military race with the United States, falling oil prices, and the bureaucratization of the system, the USSR's economic problems were mounting. Average annual GDP growth fell from 5–6% in the 1960s and 1970s to 2% by the mid-1980s.

Shortly before the August events, a referendum on preserving the USSR was held on March 17, 1991. Just over 70% of citizens participated, 76,43% of whom voted to preserve the union. A new union treaty was being drafted: on April 23, 1991, the so-called "nine plus one" statement was signed in Novo-Ogaryovo. It was planned that Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan would sign the treaty on August 20, followed by the other Soviet republics. However, on August 4, President Gorbachev made another fatal mistake by unexpectedly leaving for vacation.



On August 18, in Gorbachev's absence, USSR Vice President Yanayev signed a decree temporarily assuming the powers of the head of state. On the night of August 18–19, the State Emergency Committee (GKChP) was formed. The committee included Yanayev, Kryuchkov, Yazov, Pavlov, Pugo, and others. On August 19, the GKChP announced on radio and television that Gorbachev was unable to fulfill his official duties. Troops and military equipment were brought into the capital of the USSR, Moscow.



At the same time, Yeltsin called the actions of the State Emergency Committee an unconstitutional coup and signed Decree No. 59, declaring its decisions illegal. A so-called "defense headquarters" was formed in the House of Soviets, and under its leadership, barricades began to be erected on the streets of the capital. On August 20–21, the situation escalated as reports emerged of a possible assault on the White House, and clashes erupted. Ultimately, Yanayev hesitated to use violence against civilians and dissolved the State Emergency Committee, and the Prosecutor General's Office of the RSFSR ordered the arrest of the committee members.

As early as August 24, the Soviet republics, one after another, declared their secession from the USSR and their independence. On December 8, 1991, in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, the leaders of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine signed an agreement establishing the CIS and ending the USSR. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union was completely stripped of its power and legitimacy and was soon banned, after which the communist movement in the newly formed post-Soviet countries became fragmented.

The August events of 35 years ago and the subsequent collapse of the USSR triggered a series of armed conflicts and other tragic events, some of which continue to this day. And how many more lie ahead...

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 August 2026 14: 10
    But they did not send troops to Leningrad, although a regiment of the Pskov Airborne Division was sent there.
  2. + 23
    3 August 2026 14: 17
    /...Yanayev did not dare to use violence against civilians.../ But Yeltsin sneezed at civilians and used tanks in the center of the capital - a true "democrat"!
    1. +5
      3 August 2026 15: 16
      So, his "grateful descendants" built him a center.
      1. +6
        3 August 2026 15: 50
        A small clarification: a grateful DESCENDANT. He alone honors, cherishes, and nurtures it. Contrary to the will of the entire Russian people, and stubbornly ignores the indignation regarding this center.
    2. -5
      3 August 2026 15: 24
      Quote: eleronn
      Yanayev did not dare to use violence against civilians.

      He understood perfectly well that the troops would not obey him. He could give an order, but they would not carry it out.
      The same situation as Yanukovych - he would have shot up the Maidan and everything would have been fine, but no one would have carried out the order to shoot.
  3. + 15
    3 August 2026 14: 19
    republics of the USSR, but on August 4, the country's president, Gorbachev, made another fatal mistake by unexpectedly leaving for vacation

    Yes, Marked One generally loved to travel abroad without vacations and please everyone, but he had no time to deal with the internal problems of the USSR.
    It's telling that the leader of a once-powerful country, with a top-secret clearance, moved to Germany for permanent residence. Supposedly to give lectures and get medical treatment. A communist, his mother.
    More earth, Marked One and EBN, fiberglass. And hotter frying pans!
    1. -6
      3 August 2026 15: 27
      Quote: alexputnik17
      with his first security clearance, he moved to Germany for permanent residence.

      And what secret could he know about NON-EXISTENT by this point in the country?
  4. -1
    3 August 2026 14: 22
    Yanayev did not dare to use violence against civilians.

    Nonsense. It was a comedy aimed at destroying all organizational structures of the proletariat in order to successfully complete the bourgeois revolution.
    Accordingly, the State Emergency Committee resolved these tasks: banning the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, destroying the structure of ministries that carried out planning and linked the 15 republics into a single economic space, etc.
    1. 0
      3 August 2026 15: 20
      Like the Reichstag fire?
      1. 0
        3 August 2026 23: 00
        Like the Reichstag fire?

        I guess you could say that.
    2. +1
      3 August 2026 15: 33
      Quote: October
      the structure of ministries that carried out planning and linked the 15 republics into a single economic space was destroyed

      What "unified belay space belay " It's been 2 years since independence and it's already been Limitrophes???!!!
      They are already at home Customs introduced by this point.
      "The central government in Moscow considered the declarations of independence to be illegal. In response, the USSR In April 1990, he imposed an economic blockade on Lithuania. The restrictions also affected the supply of oil and other critical goods, which had a significant impact on the republic's economy."

      By 1991, CPSU party cards on Arbat Street cost just $3—they were so plentiful. The party itself collapsed at "communist shock speed."
      1. 0
        3 August 2026 22: 59
        What kind of "unified belay space belay" has been in effect for two years now since independence?

        They are a separate article of betrayal.
        But even without them there were 13 republics
  5. +9
    3 August 2026 14: 27
    Both Marked One and EBN are TRAITORS and LACKEYS!!!
    1. 0
      3 August 2026 15: 22
      But they are HONORED, not PEOPLE'S.
  6. +5
    3 August 2026 14: 28
    One can only regret that the State Emergency Committee did not crush all this liberal nonsense with tanks, and did not send Gorbachev to a closed prison, not a permanent settlement.
    1. +1
      3 August 2026 15: 24
      "You are evil, I'm leaving you." Kuzya (brownie)
  7. +6
    3 August 2026 14: 35
    Quote: eleronn
    /...Yanayev did not dare to use violence against civilians.../ But Yeltsin sneezed at civilians and used tanks in the center of the capital - a true "democrat"

    "+" and after 1991, there were the events of 1993, where things were much tougher.
    In 1993, I was drunk and a friend of mine were detained by the police in Moscow. We were walking home from a birthday party through the courtyards to spend the night. They checked my passport and let me go. And then they told me: don't go there, there are armored personnel carriers and soldiers there. Something like that. And a lot of civilians died in 1993. Yes. And the Yeltsin Center is thriving. It would be better to make a museum of the SVO.
    1. 0
      8 August 2026 22: 11
      And in 1993, many civilians died.

      That's not true. There were casualties, but few. And the police suffered the most. I personally saw a dead policeman and several wounded when those who had defied Yeltsin broke through the cordon from the House of Soviets and stormed Ostankino. I was among the onlookers. In theory, he could have been hit by a stray bullet, as several storefronts on Arbat Street were pierced. That day, the TV switched to a backup channel.
  8. +1
    3 August 2026 14: 39
    Shortly before the August events, on March 17, 1991, a referendum on the preservation of the USSR was held. Just over 70% of citizens participated in it, 76,43% of whom voted in favor of preserving the union.

    Only 9 of the 16 republics participated in the referendum....
    To achieve this percentage, Gorbachev authorized the Central Banks of the Union Republics to print money without limit. The Tri-Baltic republics only abandoned the ruble in 92, after Yeltsin's ultimatum. If not for the Belovezh Accords, they would have continued to suck Russia dry.
  9. 0
    3 August 2026 14: 40
    IMHO: The collapse of the Union began with the assassination of Stalin.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      3 August 2026 15: 36
      Quote: Aleksandr_68
      IMHO: The collapse of the Union began with the assassination of Stalin.

      Back then the USSR was knowingly doomed - photocopiers that make copies of Stalin still haven't been made.
      With such dependence on a specific leader, the state is not viable...
    3. +1
      4 August 2026 07: 39
      IMHO: The collapse of the Union began with the assassination of Stalin.


      It hasn't started yet. To listen to you, socialism as a system is impossible, and that all of this is Stalin's personal achievement and nothing more.
      So socialism is possible. And it is the future.
      I don’t intend to downplay Stalin’s merits.
      1. 0
        9 August 2026 15: 02
        I don’t intend to downplay Stalin’s merits.

        Along with his accomplishments, he also had serious shortcomings and crimes. So he was an extraordinary, but also controversial, figure.
        1. 0
          9 August 2026 16: 44
          Along with his accomplishments, he also had serious shortcomings and crimes. So he was an extraordinary, but also controversial, figure.

          Stalin was an UNBEATABLE positive figure. He committed no crimes. Ruthlessness toward enemies is the norm. And in such a complex undertaking as building a society on new principles, mistakes are simply inevitable. Some people make mistakes when multiplying two numbers together.
          1. 0
            9 August 2026 18: 08
            My wife's grandparents died of starvation in 1933. All food supplies were requisitioned from the house. And this was under Stalin's rule.
            1. 0
              9 August 2026 21: 27
              Details of the events are needed to judge this. I see no reason to attribute this to Stalin, especially considering the regular famines in Tsarist Russia. It was the collective farms that saved the country from famine.
              Could you provide some details, preferably not just from memory?
              1. 0
                10 August 2026 12: 59
                It was precisely the collective farms that saved the country from hunger.

                False claim. The country was saved from famine by expanding grain cultivation, primarily on virgin lands, and increasing yields through the use of new varieties and mineral fertilizers.
                1. 0
                  10 August 2026 14: 43
                  You either don't know the subject of the conversation, or you are a deliberate liar, twice over.
                  1) The collective farms themselves allowed for an increase in agricultural production due to
                  a) mechanization of agricultural labor
                  b) the introduction of scientifically based rational land use (and in particular yours)
                  increasing yields through the use of new varieties and mineral fertilizers

                  because only collective farms could do this on a large scale throughout the country at once
                  c) it was the collective farm system that made it possible to mobilize labor force on a large scale for clearing and developing new territories (in the Volga region, the Urals, Siberia, and later, virgin lands).
                  and not your spherical horse in a vacuum
                  The country was saved from famine by expanding grain crops, mainly on virgin lands.
                  ,
                  cut off from agriculture
                  2) Collective farms for solving this problem were only a part of the socialist system, which created the necessary conditions for the work of the collective farm and the eradication of hunger by
                  a) development of transport infrastructure
                  b) creation of a system of state reserves in case of crop failure
                  c) state monopoly on distribution

                  In turn, increased labor productivity on collective farms freed up many workers who took part in the country's industrialization, which, in particular, provided collective farms with specialized equipment.
                  1. 0
                    10 August 2026 18: 33
                    Collective farms for solving this problem were only a part of the socialist system, which created the necessary conditions for the work of the collective farm and the eradication of hunger by

                    Nevertheless, in capitalist countries (e.g., the USA, England, France, Germany), farmers solved the problem of hunger through mechanization, chemicalization, and expansion of arable land, without any collective farms and even before them. And Tsarist Russia, after the initial settlement of Siberia, even exported grain, despite years of famine.
                    1. 0
                      10 August 2026 22: 49
                      You started by saying that collective farms alone weren't the solution to the famine problem. Now you've retracted that assertion (since you haven't refuted any of my previous assertions), and you continue to spew lies.
                      And Tsarist Russia, after the initial settlement of Siberia, even exported grain, although there were years of famine.

                      read at least bourgeois Ruwiki
                      [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%B2_%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8]
                      They were driven out despite the dying people inside the country.

                      Nevertheless, in capitalist countries (for example, the USA, England, France, Germany), farmers solved the problem of hunger precisely through mechanization, chemicalization, and expansion of arable land without any collective farms and before them.

                      Have you heard anything about the hunger march in the United States around 1930?
                      [https://webkamerton.ru/2025/10/istoriya-golodnykh-marshey-v-ssha-1932-1933]
                      At the same time, there was famine in Poland, Lithuania, etc.
                      [https://pontokot.livejournal.com/719213.html]

                      You are a liar and anti-Soviet, sir.
                      1. 0
                        10 August 2026 23: 57
                        You are a liar and anti-Soviet, sir.

                        Once I had to work for about a year as an instructor for the Komsomol District Committee, side by side with the district party committee and their instructors.
                        So, if anyone is a liar and a hypocrite before the people, it is the leading force of the Soviet people called the CPSU.
                      2. -1
                        Yesterday, 07: 26
                        Once I had to work for about a year as an instructor for the Komsomol District Committee, side by side with the district party committee and their instructors.


                        Then you are not only anti-Soviet, but also a hypocrite.
  10. +5
    3 August 2026 14: 42
    Both Yeltsin and Gorbachev should have been hanged on the same lamppost.
  11. +3
    3 August 2026 15: 04
    No one was going to save the USSR, including those on whom the Soviet taxpayer spent most of their money - the Soviet Army, the KGB, and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
    The events of August 35 years ago and the subsequent collapse of the USSR became the cause a whole series of armed conflicts and other tragic events, some of which continue to this day.

    Not at all. The author is deliberately misleading forum members; interethnic conflicts in the USSR began long before the State Emergency Committee; the Alma-Ata events of 86 alone are worth mentioning...
    The Communist Party of the Russian Federation should be banned in the Russian Federation, since it has no connection with the RSFSR (unlike other republics, it never had its own Communist Party), and especially not with the current Russian Federation.
    On December 8, 1991, in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, the leaders of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine signed an agreement on the creation of the CIS and the end of the USSR.

    It's clear why the "Tsar-Boris" agreement was signed. What were the leaders of the BSSR and the Ukrainian SSR counting on? The former BSSR quickly came to its senses and became a strategic partner of the crumbling Russian Federation in the 1990s, while the former Ukrainian SSR (which, for example, had a GDP three times larger than the Polish People's Republic in 1991), like a failed "second France" and a successful "Ukraine not Russia," is now burning in flames, awaiting the fragmentation of "its" territory from the west... and losing "its" lands from the east and south.
    The republics that initiated the collapse of the Union lost their populations and/or "their" lands as a result of its collapse (Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia). The SVO is a continuation of the process of the collapse of the Soviet Empire... so, new SVOs are quite possible in its vast expanses... "Our" Ministry of Foreign Affairs will do everything to ensure this...
    1. 0
      4 August 2026 07: 36
      Interethnic conflicts in the USSR began long before the State Emergency Committee; the Alma-Ata events of 86 alone are worth something...

      You're a liar. Yours for a long time - it's the same ruler - Gorbachev.

      No one was going to save the USSR, including those on whom the Soviet taxpayer spent most of their money - the Soviet Army, the KGB, and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

      Tell me, have you ever heard the word "disinformation"? That's the campaign that was going on back then. And now you're running it. It benefits Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
  12. +2
    3 August 2026 15: 20
    Red Star Tanks
    They enter a wide square...
    Ah, Tiananmen!
    Why aren't you in Moscow?!
    [Haiku]))
  13. 0
    3 August 2026 15: 28
    No referendum was held at all in Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Moldova. But one was held in Ukraine, but the war broke out there.
  14. +1
    3 August 2026 15: 30
    Gorbachev made another fatal mistake by unexpectedly leaving for vacation.

    Is it unexpected?
  15. +1
    3 August 2026 15: 32
    Quote: your1970
    And what secret could he know about a country that NON-EXISTED at that moment?

    Good question. hi "+"
    At least about the promising developments of what's just now being put into service. These were initiatives back in the USSR.
  16. +2
    3 August 2026 15: 36
    Quote: Aleksandr_68
    IMHO: The collapse of the Union began with the assassination of Stalin.

    Yes I completely agree. At the very least, a decline! Populism at the top, regardless of leadership, and bureaucracy. They decided on some new things, but mostly, they were out of the ordinary.
  17. 0
    3 August 2026 15: 38
    Average annual GDP growth fell from 5–6% in the 1960s and 1970s to 2% by the mid-1980s
    The only case in history where a country responded to a slowdown in economic growth with a national collapse and a massive economic downturn. Others have lived like this for decades and nothing has changed. request
  18. 0
    3 August 2026 15: 49
    Quote: commbatant
    No one was going to save the USSR, including those on whom the Soviet taxpayer spent most of their money.

    good Yes
    Quote: commbatant
    SA, KGB

    I can't agree with that. It's an instrument of power, not a solution to political issues affecting the country's statehood.
    My mother had a friend, a KGB colonel, a real Felix, who was in charge of Moscow. He always laughed and joked when I asked him to tell me his secret. He'd reply that he'd die, and then he wouldn't be allowed to tell me for another 50 years. laughing
    So he was very upset by the collapse of the USSR, he always considered it a mistake, but he said that we could interfere in matters that were none of our business.
    And I personally am grateful to both the security forces and the military when they stupidly refused to deal with the political cesspool and squabbles, to their own detriment. IMHO.
  19. 0
    8 August 2026 23: 03
    Quote: Alexey Lantukh
    This is not true. There were casualties, but few.

    It depends on what "few" means. You have your truth, I have mine. The truth is somewhere in the middle. The State Duma says 160 killed, around 500 wounded, and I heard a specialist say the same thing.
    In 1993, things were much harsher than in 91. The military didn't side with the demonstrators and others, but followed orders.
    Once again, the police let me go home, drunk but with my passport, and a girl without one, which was a 15-minute walk away. They told me not to go there, there was a military cordon with an armored personnel carrier.
    At that point, one policeman asked if he should give us a ride. I said it was faster through the courtyards, and that you still had work to do. They had a reason for saying that.
    Three of my comrades were rounded up by the military. They were subjected to identification, or rather, identity checks, for two days. They sat in an overcrowded holding cell. The only freedoms were a drink and a bathroom break. We learned and heard a lot from our unfortunate brothers.
    My brother works right next to the White House. It's a residential building on a hill. It's in the basement. The White House is right there in the palm of your hand. The neighbors in that building also told me a lot about how lovely it was there and how little was going on.
  20. 0
    10 August 2026 09: 55
    And during those days I was in training in the border detachment, KVPO, we, the spirits, were raised on alert and transferred to the detachment outposts for reinforcement, and a week later back to the unit and a couple of days later again towards the border - but this time to collect potatoes for the unit in the border collective farm.