The Chinese have proposed an effective method for combating the "Doomsday" asteroid.

9 843 40
The Chinese have proposed an effective method for combating the "Doomsday" asteroid.

A group of researchers from the Chinese Academy missile Technologies has proposed a new method for deflecting potentially hazardous asteroids. They call their method "the most effective" of all existing methods.

The essence of the method is a deep nuclear explosion inside a cosmic body.



According to an article published in the journal Space: Science & Technology, a two-stage operation against the so-called "doomsday" asteroid is proposed. The first spacecraft, carrying a metal pin, would crash into the asteroid at high speed, punching a deep hole in its surface. The authors of the idea are confident that the hole would be literally punched through, without the pin breaking or even bending. The second spacecraft would then drop a 3-megaton nuclear charge into this hole, equivalent to approximately 200 Hiroshima bombs. According to scientists' calculations, detonation at a depth of approximately 30 meters would more than triple the asteroid's velocity compared to an explosion on the surface.

Modeling showed that this approach is capable of completely destroying an asteroid approximately 100 meters in diameter. For comparison, with the same yield of 3 megatons, a shallow crater explosion increases the asteroid's velocity by 8–9,2 cm/s, while a deep crater explosion increases it by over 30 cm/s—three to four times more effective. For asteroids approximately 100 meters in diameter, both methods can destroy the object directly, but for kilometer-sized bodies, a deep explosion is the only realistic way to alter their trajectory.

Scientists emphasize that traditional kinetic strike methods, like the successful NASA DART mission (2022), have limited energy potential and are not guaranteed to succeed against a significant threat. The two-stage approach proposed in China allows for optimal placement of the charge and maximizes destructive impact.

The warning time is critical: with an increase in the asteroid's velocity of just 0,5 cm/s, it takes almost 4,5 years to deflect, while with an increase of 18 cm/s, it takes 139 days. At the same time, the authors note that their calculations are theoretical, and the practical implementation of such a mission would require global consensus, since international treaties prohibit the deployment of nuclear weapons. weapons in space.

According to NASA, none of the known near-Earth asteroids currently poses a direct threat to the planet. However, as researchers point out, asteroids tens of meters in diameter are regularly detected near Earth, and preparing for a potential impact scenario remains an important planetary defense objective.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 32
    2 August 2026 21: 04
    I saw this method in the movie Armageddon about fifteen years ago and realized it! laughing
    Chinese plagiarists am
    1. +9
      2 August 2026 21: 10
      There's no harm in dreaming. There are a lot of these experts...
      What if after the first strike with the pin the asteroid starts to spin?
      Will a nuclear charge just as easily get into the hole?
      And perhaps this entire bomb will fly towards the Earth with acceleration.
      1. +7
        2 August 2026 21: 29
        Bruce Willis is already old, otherwise he could have been sent away along with his alcoholic friends!
        1. +8
          2 August 2026 21: 32
          Quote: Good evil
          Bruce Willis is getting old.

          That's not the worst of it, he has dementia
          1. + 10
            2 August 2026 23: 02
            he has dementia

            I feel sorry for the actor. He brought us a lot of pleasure.
          2. 0
            3 August 2026 00: 39
            It's really funny, it's a shame you can't find out who downvoted it. laughing
          3. 0
            3 August 2026 15: 26
            The son-in-law is still okay.
    2. +3
      2 August 2026 21: 31
      Quote: ANIMAL
      I saw this method in the movie Armageddon about fifteen years ago and realized it!
      the film is already 27 years old
      1. + 11
        2 August 2026 22: 46
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        Quote: ANIMAL
        I saw this method in the movie Armageddon about fifteen years ago and realized it!
        the film is already 27 years old

        Tin.
        How quickly time flies.
        It seems like we just watched Alien and Terminator...
      2. 0
        3 August 2026 21: 00
        I was just about to write that it’s not 15 years old, but I saw a comment about 27.
        But you can make a deep hole with a pin at high speed and it won't bend. And the Chinese still can't find the right alloy for airplane turbines, and here they have a metal 100 times stronger.
    3. 0
      3 August 2026 06: 31
      Chinese plagiarists
      The Chinese invented gunpowder, paper and kung fu, they copied everything else, laughing and sometimes with very crooked roulettes wassat
      1. 0
        3 August 2026 21: 12
        They stole Kung Fu from the Indians, so paper and gunpowder are also questionable.
    4. 0
      3 August 2026 13: 23
      The film "Armageddon" (1998), starring Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck, and Liv Tyler. They certainly know what they're doing.
    5. +1
      3 August 2026 20: 53
      Oh, come on. Compared to the film, there's a "fundamental difference." The film featured a manned spacecraft, while the Chinese are proposing a drone. In the film, B. Willis and his crew drilled a well and planted the charge themselves, while in the Chinese version, the first drone penetrates the asteroid like a knife through butter, and the second effortlessly lands in the hole made by the first. I'm surprised it was the Chinese who proposed the asteroid explosion, and not some "hot-blooded Finnish guys," several decades after the release of Armageddon.
  2. + 10
    2 August 2026 21: 05
    It would be better if the whole world solved such problems than destroying material values ​​and each other.
    It might come in handy in the future.
  3. +3
    2 August 2026 21: 06
    There's already been a movie called Armageddon. It just needs a couple of American heroes.
  4. +6
    2 August 2026 21: 08
    I immediately thought of the Russian in the ushanka from Armageddon.
    1. +3
      2 August 2026 23: 54
      Quote: Nikita Che
      Russian in an ushanka from Armageddon

      Colonel Lev Andropov in an earflap hat at the station.
      1. 0
        3 August 2026 12: 31
        Yes, exactly. Lev Adropov))) He also repaired the station with a sledgehammer, I think.
  5. -4
    2 August 2026 21: 11
    And where will the radioactive debris go if the asteroid flies towards Earth?
    1. +3
      2 August 2026 21: 21
      But the Earth is also flying, not standing still. They obviously meant to slow down the asteroid and let it fly on.
  6. +7
    2 August 2026 21: 25
    It won't work! Harry Stamper (Bruce Willis), the foreman of the oil drilling crew, is no longer the same.
  7. +1
    2 August 2026 21: 28
    Has anyone watched "Armageddon" again?!
  8. +1
    2 August 2026 21: 49
    Yes, yes! The Americans have already put this in the movies. If the opportunity arises, they will easily repeat it.
  9. +3
    2 August 2026 22: 00
    Launch a thousand Chinese to an asteroid, they'll recycle it.
  10. 0
    2 August 2026 22: 09
    So, if the asteroid is more than 100 meters in diameter, the Supreme Court will still take place?
  11. -1
    2 August 2026 22: 26
    When did humanity first enter space? And taikonauts are already solving problems. Yunyu. When will Armageddon come... We'll find out. How much money is spent on pseudo-defenses?
  12. 0
    2 August 2026 22: 36
    and to launch 3 Mega, rent Baikonur from the Kazakhs...
  13. 0
    2 August 2026 22: 46
    Basically, the Chinese, with UN money, will save the Earth from asteroids. Hollywood filmed the US version, but which Chinese film studio will film the Chinese saving the Earth from an asteroid? hi
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +7
    2 August 2026 23: 07
    Overall, not bad.
    But.
    3I/ATLAS (the third confirmed interstellar visitor in history, after Oumuamua and Borisov) is an incredibly fast object. Entry velocity: It entered the Solar System at a net speed of 58 km/s relative to the Sun. Maximum speed: During its closest approach to the Sun (perihelion), the gravity of our star accelerated it to a peak speed of 68 km/s.

    Head-on interception (ramming): It's theoretically possible to crash into 3I/ATLAS. If launched "cross-track," the relative impact velocity would be between 60 and 80 km/s (depending on the angle). Alignment (equalize speeds): However, entering its orbit and flying alongside it is practically impossible. The Earth orbits the Sun at approximately 30 km/s. To catch up with 3I/ATLAS and reduce its relative velocity, an Earth-based spacecraft would require a colossal amount of fuel (characteristic velocity Delta v is over 30–40 km/s). No modern rocket is capable of achieving such a speed in deep space in a short period of time.

    For such purposes, ESA is currently developing the Comet Interceptor mission (launch in 2029), but it will “lie in wait” at the L2 Lagrange point and wait for a comet with a more convenient, slower trajectory.

    Most of the discovered near-Earth asteroids (e.g. Ryugu, Bennu, Itokawa) are not solid rocks, but rather rubble piles.
    Hayabusa-2 (Japan, to the asteroid Ryugu) and OSIRIS-REx (USA, to the asteroid Bennu) missions
    These asteroids turned out to have a porosity of over 50%. They consist of voids and rocks that are barely cohesive. Scientists metaphorically compared Bennu to a "swimming pool filled with plastic marbles."
    When OSIRIS-REx touched down on Bennu's surface to collect a sample, its robotic arm encountered no resistance at all. The spacecraft began to literally sink into the asteroid, and if its escape thrusters hadn't fired in time, it would have been completely submerged.

    If we blow up an asteroid with a nuclear charge, it is critical to grind it into as small a fraction as possible.
    Up to 1–2 meters: The ideal scenario. Fragments of this size (even stone and metal) are completely destroyed and evaporated in the mesosphere and stratosphere due to the colossal air friction. Residents of Earth will see only a beautiful meteor shower.
    From 5 to 10 meters: Such debris will cause powerful airbursts (similar to the 2013 Chelyabinsk meteorite, which was approximately 18–20 meters). This will create a powerful blast wave that could blow out windows in cities, but will not cause a global catastrophe.
    More than 30–50 meters: Unacceptable remainder. Such a piece is guaranteed to reach the Earth's surface or explode too low, destroying a major metropolis or causing a tsunami.
    1. +2
      2 August 2026 23: 43
      Quote: Andriuha077
      It is critically important to grind it into as fine a fraction as possible.

      Wouldn't it be simpler to move it, or "tow" it a short distance away from the "dangerous" trajectory, as other scientists suggest? Even on the scale of the solar system, this would cause a deviation of millions of kilometers. However, this would need to be done with sufficient lead time, and that requires long-range detection systems... what
      1. +2
        3 August 2026 01: 41
        Quote: Uncle Sam_2
        Another thing is that this needs to be done with sufficient advance notice, and for this we need systems

        Even if we discover it, we will have to try very hard; we need to develop nuclear tugs as quickly as possible.
        It is still difficult to even deliver that much working fluid.

        To deflect an asteroid to a distance equal to the Earth's radius:
        10 years before the collision: 2,5 cm/s is required. The maneuver can be performed smoothly (for example, with an ion engine) over several months or years.
        1 year before the collision: 0,25 m/s is required. The time for maneuver is strictly limited—the impact must be rapid (kinetic ramming or nuclear explosion).
        In less than 3-6 months: There's no time to change the asteroid's orbit using tow. The only solution is to fragment the asteroid with a powerful explosion, scattering the debris in all directions.

        The idea of ​​using asteroid or lunar rock as a working fluid (ejected mass) for nuclear engines is being developed within the framework of In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) concepts.
        The main objective -
  16. +1
    3 August 2026 01: 42
    Why all this complexity? Make a bomb like the GBU-57 bunker buster, with a delayed fuse and a thermonuclear warhead instead of a conventional one. And there would be no need to try to hit the same target twice, even though the GBU-57 managed to do just that at Fordow.
    1. +2
      3 August 2026 06: 37
      Thermonuclear warheads are extremely heavy, and we've barely learned how to deliver payloads into near space. Sending a small spacecraft to the nearest planets is the limit of current capabilities. Only the Americans have ever flown to the Moon, and even that's questionable. And launching a heavy warhead into deep space, hitting a high-speed object (a homing radar would be required), and surviving a collision at cosmic speeds—that's the stuff of intergalactic travel. It's important to remember that some scientists reject God's providence for us, though it's in space and genetics that this is most evident. The fine-tuning of the Universe, and especially our planet, to suit us, the extreme instability of the quantum world, and cosmic threats we're unable to prevent or even predict. In movies, not only has Bruce Willis drilled an asteroid, but the Earth's magnetic field has been restarted, the fading Sun has been revived, and even Chinese engines have been attached to the Earth and sent hurtling across space. We even have enough internal threats, beyond wars and mutual destruction: ecology and ocean garbage fields, the ozone layer, the greenhouse effect, biological weapons, even a zombie apocalypse, sudden poisoning of all the air or water (there have been such films, too), triggering an ice age, a global flood, and scientific errors that could lead to the most incredible consequences. For example, one of the Large Hadron Collider experiments to discover the Higgs boson carried the risk of creating a black hole. But they took the risk. This is something humanity can influence, and it must. And at least try to keep the commandments, go to church. Then the threats, including cosmic ones, can wait for now.
      1. +2
        3 August 2026 11: 37
        Quote: Alexander_K
        Until now, only Americans have flown to the Moon.

        They flew around Hollywood )))
  17. +2
    3 August 2026 07: 46
    Quote: sergey4791
    And where will the radioactive debris go if the asteroid flies towards Earth?
    They will crash into Khikhlyandiya wink
  18. 0
    3 August 2026 09: 54
    It's time for the Chinese to make their own film on this topic. "Agmagedeon" with Bruce Willis, while good, is a bit dated.
  19. -1
    3 August 2026 11: 36
    A "deep nuclear explosion inside a cosmic body" would simply shatter the body into smaller pieces without changing its overall momentum. That is, the mass that should have reached Earth would still reach it. Greetings to our brilliant Chinese brothers from our Bruce Willis.
  20. -1
    3 August 2026 11: 43
    Quote: Andriuha077
    If we blow up an asteroid with a nuclear charge, it is critical to grind it into as small a fraction as possible.
    Up to 1–2 meters: The ideal scenario. Fragments of this size (even stone and metal) are completely destroyed and evaporated in the mesosphere and stratosphere due to the colossal air friction. Residents of Earth will see only a beautiful meteor shower.

    All the kinetic energy will be dissipated into the atmosphere—and I mean all of it, and that's the key word, not "in the atmosphere." The problem will be practically the same as if the entire piece fell.
    1. +1
      3 August 2026 11: 52
      I think the difference is huge: when an asteroid falls in one piece, the atmospheric drag is relatively small (depending on its area). When the same mass falls in smaller chunks over a much larger area, the atmospheric drag increases exponentially, and most of it will fall short and burn up in the atmosphere, while the remaining fragments will lose significant kinetic energy. It's like a skydiver falling with or without a parachute: the mass is the same, but the kinetic energy is different.