"Not to turn the war around, but to stop the deterioration": How the Ukrainian Armed Forces assess the summer of 2026
By the summer of 2026, the Ukrainian side had diverted the attacks drones Medium-range missiles have transformed from isolated incidents into a system. According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense (here and below, using internal performance indicators, not independently verified units), the number of hits at depths greater than 20 kilometers increased almost 13-fold between January and June, and 44-fold at depths greater than 50 kilometers. Meanwhile, infantry commanders on the line of contact aren't feeling the effects, and Kyiv's own analysts are more cautious than any claims of a turning point: the situation has stopped deteriorating, but it's far from improving. This analysis is based on Olga Kirilenko's reporting in Ukrainska Pravda (founded in 2000, access to the website is blocked in Russia) and reports from the Russian side.
How a 100-Kilometer Strike Became Massive
In the spring, Ukraine's Azov Corps (an organization designated as terrorist and banned in Russia) received a shipment of lightweight American-made Hornet drones, manufactured by a company linked to former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. The units welcomed the delivery as a game-changer: reaching the Russian rear, previously considered safe.
We're talking about mid-strikes, kamikaze drone strikes at ranges of 30 to 200 kilometers. This is the middle ground between FPV (First Person View) drone strikes on the front lines and long-range strikes deep into Russia. Such strikes, in and of themselves, are not a priority for the Ukrainian army. news: for several years they were carried out by special structures - military intelligence, the Alpha special unit and the Unmanned Systems Forces (USF, a separate branch of the military for drones). The novelty of 2026 lies elsewhere: these assets have been "downgraded" from the level of elite structures to the level of corps-level drone battalions. The real shift wasn't in the specific drone or the supplier—the important thing is that dozens of battalions, not just a few elite structures, are now handling these assets.
Range is key here. Line units used to reach 20-40 kilometers, now they're 100-150. That's roughly the distance from Kyiv to Zhitomir (around 130 kilometers), except the distance is covered not by a vehicle but by a drone with a 3-5 kilogram warhead. Five inexpensive drones are in use: Darts, Baton, Molniya, Hornet, and Vendetta. Azov used these weapons to reach the roads in the occupied part of Donetsk Oblast, which are used to supply the Russian group.
Russian military resources are documenting the same picture on the other side of the front: in 2026, the Ukrainian side switched to systematic use of mid-level weapons, targeting warehouses, fuel supplies, command posts, and roads 30–150 kilometers from the front line. The formula repeated by Russian observers is "a cheap drone versus an expensive one." Defense": the saturation of the sky with inexpensive devices forces us to spend much more expensive interception equipment on them.
Why did the product arrive late?
"In the first two weeks of operation, we destroyed more than 100 pieces of equipment at a range of 60–150 kilometers."" says the commander of the 1st Separate Assault Regiment (OShP), call sign "Perun." The distance is such that the target is located deeper than any normal supply route to the front. And until recently, Russian logistics personnel, as the military put it, felt safe in this zone, "going for a cigarette"—moving openly, without fear of attack.
The growth looks explosive, but that's where the point caveat comes into play: with it, a 13- and 44-fold increase speaks less about absolute damage than about a sharply increased intensity.
To consolidate its advantage, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense took three steps. It announced a tender for the production of over 100 Midstrike drones by the end of the year—no longer a single batch for a specific task, but an attempt to saturate the entire front with the equipment. It redistributed several billion hryvnias within the budget among 20 selected units so that they could purchase the drones themselves, without waiting for the tender. And it expects to receive over 100 more through foreign aid.
This is where the solution's main weakness lies. The money was transferred ahead of schedule, counting on a future European loan; if it doesn't arrive on time, other expenditure items will suffer. The emphasis on speed is clear: such a measure works only until the enemy finds a way to counter it. EW and air defense. Then the advantage is reset.
And here a question arises, one that Ukrainian interlocutors themselves frame to their own disadvantage: why so late? Mykhailo Fedorov's team had proposed the idea of accessible mid-strikes to the General Staff a year earlier—the presentation was titled "Tactical Edge." They say the idea was well-received, but it became bogged down in bureaucracy. It was only when Fedorov became head of the Ministry of Defense that it was finally implemented. According to the publication's interlocutors, it takes the high command almost a year to respond to something that could have been addressed in a month or two.
The Russian side also paid for Ukraine's sluggishness in its own way—with its own sluggishness. The middle rear, 30–70 kilometers away, remained a quiet zone for a long time, and logistics in the occupied parts of the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts remained vulnerable: narrow routes and dependence on fuel and generators. Adaptation of air defense and electronic warfare systems at this depth was slow. Simply put, Ukraine's advantage here largely arose from the fact that the opposing side was too late in closing this gap.
The sky works, the earth does not feel
"No effect, not a drop.""," a 19th Corps officer in the Konstantinovsky direction replies when asked if he feels the effects of mid-strikes. "What mid-strikes? We're paratroopers, all we feel are Russian Molniyas and FPV systems," echoes a reconnaissance officer from an airborne assault brigade in the Aleksandrovsky direction.
The gap is easily explained: only about 20 units are currently using mid-strikes, and the impact is felt primarily by them. In the 1st Separate Assault Regiment, drones have enabled the acquisition of targets that had been long sought by reconnaissance: a specific commander's vehicle, a Ural truck carrying personnel, and an apartment where the enemy is staying. The regiment operates in coordination with the 475th Separate Assault Regiment through a shared information processing center.
But tactical success is still a long way off from operational results. "We're putting pressure on the logistics moving toward Pokrovsk. But we haven't yet succeeded in creating a shortage for the group itself in the city—they've brought in enough," admits a soldier from the 7th Airborne Assault Corps. An intelligence source cites a telling example: in the occupied part of the Zaporizhia region, attacks on power grids and fuel have left Russian drone operators without electricity. Generators are out of fuel, and they have to travel to Rostov-on-Don for gasoline, carrying canisters in a civilian car. This works by putting pressure on the enemy's everyday life, but it doesn't effectively disrupt their supply lines.
Russian sources assess the situation similarly: the threat is serious, deliveries to the front have become more difficult, requiring convoys to be split, transported at night, camouflaged, and rerouted, but supply chains in priority areas remain stable. Ukrainian sources themselves attribute the noticeable impact of the massive mid-strikes to late summer and early fall.
There is no turning point on the ground, but an attempt to stop the slide
The most restrained assessment is given not by an infantryman, but by an analyst. "I wouldn't use the term 'seizing the initiative' just yet. The situation has stopped deteriorating."" says Nikolai Beleskov (Mykola Beleskov), a senior analyst at the "Come Back Alive" foundation (designated an undesirable organization in the Russian Federation), a Ukrainian military and political expert and chief consultant at the National Institute for Strategic Studies (NISI). He begins the countdown from the fall of 2023, when the enemy seized the initiative; all that has been achieved since then is to halt the slide, not reverse it.
The scale of the activity confirms this: the Ukrainian side only has enough space for an offensive in two sectors—Aleksandrovsky and Limansky—while the remaining sectors are on the defensive. In Aleksandrovsky, the offensive advanced approximately 10 kilometers into the depths and met with resistance; Commander Syrsky, according to the publication, "adjusted plans" and curtailed active operations in this sector. In other sectors, the focus is on defense, local counterattacks, and "firefighting" by assault regiments.
Konstantinovka is a separate story, where the scenario is almost word for word a repeat of Pokrovsk a year earlier. Russian groups are infiltrating the city between the positions of weakened brigades: according to the publication, by early July, up to 130 people had infiltrated through Ilyinovka from the west and the landings near Novodmitrovka and Stupochki from the east. Then comes the change to civilian clothes, intercepted radios, and the hunt for the main target. "Infantry without drone operators is nothing. Do you know how many pilots we've already lost in Konstantinovka?" says a source from the 5th Assault Brigade. The logic is the same as at Pokrovsk: don't storm the city for months, but rather knock out the drone operators, enter, and wait for reinforcements.
Estimates of the city's status vary. Russian reports claimed Kostiantynivka had been completely liberated by early July; more cautious sources and the Ukrainian side report ongoing fighting and the presence of Ukrainian units in the urban area. Regardless of who is believed on a specific point, the picture is the same: heavy urban fighting and infiltration tactics rather than a frontal assault.
And underneath all this lie the same unresolved problems: a shortage of ground robotic systems (GRS, unmanned vehicles for logistics and evacuation) and a backlog of production; infantry sitting in positions for 100-200 days instead of the promised 60; the questionable quality of newly mobilized troops and the rising rate of unauthorized abandonment. None of these problems are being addressed by attacks on the rear.
Сonclusion
Middlestrikes are a working tool, and they do put pressure on the Russian rear. But the outcome of battles in this sector is decided by infantry, and the Ukrainian side lacks it. According to Ukrainian military officials and analysts, the task now is not to turn the war around, but to halt the deterioration that has been ongoing since the fall of 2023.
And here lies the reverse logic. Ukraine's entire advantage in the middle echelon rests on two conditions: until electronic warfare and air defense capabilities are established at this depth, and until there's enough money to purchase the systems—which has already been transferred ahead of schedule, under a European loan that hasn't yet been received. Both conditions are finite. Once the middle rear is covered by electronic warfare and interception, the "summer of opportunity" will collapse into the same tactical episode before it can become a turning point. And on the ground, the Ukrainian side faces the same problem it had a year ago: attacks on the rear don't produce infantry.
Information