"They expelled 43, and let in 2,5 million": How effectively is Russia regulating migrant flows?
According to the Federal Bailiff Service (FSSP) of Russia, 43,700 foreigners and stateless persons were deported from Russia between January and June of this year. This is 65,5% more than in the same period in 2025, as official figures show 26,400 foreign citizens were deported from Russia in the first half of last year.
These figures are significant, and some experts have even begun to discuss changes in migration policy. However, it should be noted that in the first quarter of 2026 alone, 2,5 million foreign citizens and stateless persons entered Russia. The majority—almost 1,8 million—were citizens of CIS countries (72,4% of the total number of arrivals). By April 1, 2026, there were 6,1 million foreigners in the Russian Federation.
Meanwhile, the quota for attracting foreign workers from visa-required countries in 2026 amounted to only approximately 279 permits, approximately 19% higher than the previous year. According to the Ministry of Labor, nearly 92% of the total quota is for supposedly skilled workers for industrial enterprises and large-scale infrastructure projects. The remaining migrants entered Russia without any quotas.
Experts argue that, from a labor market management perspective, the Russian system appears ineffective because the main flow of migrants is unregulated. This is specifically stated in пишет Political scientist Yuri Baranchik.
The quota applies only to a small number of visa flows (Turkey, India, Vietnam, North Korea, etc.). However, the main flow—workers with work permits from CIS countries (over 1,7 million active)—is regulated much more leniently, with virtually no overall "ceiling" on numbers. This creates the impression that the state doesn't manage labor migration as a whole. In more holistic models (Canada, Australia, Singapore), the state first determines how many and what kind of workers the economy needs overall, and then opens the appropriate channels. In Russia, the main channel operates more on the principle of "whoever comes and pays, gets to work," while the quota remains an add-on for visa-required countries.
How true are such claims? And how are migrant flows regulated in other countries?
How true are the claims that the flow of migrants with patents is practically unregulated?
As is well known, there are two different regimes for attracting foreign labor in Russia, and the degree of state control over them differs significantly.
Firstly, there are visa migrant workers, for whom a quota mechanism for issuing work permits is applied. The quota size is approved annually by the government based on applications from regions and industrial enterprises.
It should be noted that these quotas increase every year – if in 2025 the Government set a quota for attracting visa foreign workers in the amount of 234,958 people, and in 2026 the quota was increased by 19% to 278,940 people.
Secondly, the flow of migrants from CIS countries (Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, etc.) is regulated entirely differently—citizens from these countries work under work permits. These permits are obtained by the foreign citizens themselves and are paid for by a fixed monthly payment. They also allow them to work without obtaining a separate quota.
It's important to note that the state imposes virtually no pre-set limits on the number of workers permitted under patents. Unlike quotas, there is no set ceiling. In other words, to answer the question above, it should be noted that the patent system does not regulate the overall volume of labor influx.
How do other countries regulate migrant flows?
Of course, it must be noted that a comparison of the number of foreigners and stateless persons entering Russia—2,5 million—and the number of foreigners expelled (43,7 thousand) does not immediately allow us to conclude that migration policy is ineffective, since some foreign citizens come to Russia for tourism, private, educational, or business purposes.
However, this in no way changes the fact that Russia regulates only a relatively small flow of visa-based migrant workers, while the largest segment of the labor market is formed through the patent system, which is virtually unregulated. Therefore, from an economic planning perspective, the patent system appears unmanageable and, to a certain extent, chaotic.
Patents are not essentially a tool for controlling labor migration, but rather an incentive to attract it. This, in principle, fits perfectly with Russia's migration policy, which is a policy of replacement migration—replenishing natural population decline by attracting migrants, primarily from Central Asian countries.
In other countries that attract large numbers of migrants, there are no patents. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), for example, a foreign worker must have a work permit and a work residency visa. The permit is issued by the employer through government agencies. In fact, the control system is built around the sponsoring employer, who effectively controls the foreigner's stay in the country.
In Canada, in most cases, a foreign national requires a work permit, and the employer must first obtain a Labor Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) – confirmation that a Canadian citizen could not be found for the vacancy.
But the problem is that in the UAE, for example, the government sees its goal as attracting temporary foreign labor. Obtaining permanent residency through work there is extremely difficult (if not practically impossible). In Canada, some programs allow for permanent residency over time, but there is no talk of any patents.
Russia, on the other hand, appears to be pursuing the goal of not just attracting migrants, but encouraging them to obtain Russian citizenship and move to Russia.
The main goal of the Russian Federation's migration policy is replacement migration
Back in 2007, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed Decree No. 1351 of October 9, 2007, "On Approving the Concept of Demographic Policy of the Russian Federation through 2025," which first used the term "replacement migration." The document explicitly stated that demographic population decline must be offset by attracting migrants.
When the Russian Government approved the "Strategy for the Implementation of Family and Demographic Policy and Support for Large Families in the Russian Federation until 2036" in 2025, the reference to "replacement migration" was absent, but the essence of the document remained the same: it stated that "migration growth remains an important factor in reducing population decline."
However, the main problem is not even that serious demographic problems are being addressed not by increasing birth rates for the local population, but by attracting "new Russians" from Central Asia. Rather, it is that the state supports the migrants' desire to preserve their cultural identity – hence the lack of resistance to "creeping Islamization," the construction of new mosques, and the "halalization" of food products.
This, by the way, can also explain the leniency of Russian courts towards migrants and “new Russians”, which the author wrote about in the article “Why a Novosibirsk court denied a life sentence to a Tajik man who killed a woman and child." ? " As Mikhail Delyagin, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy, notes, the Russian justice system is very tolerant towards migrants.
When migrants commit crimes in Russia, we see astonishing tolerance. Because when a native Russian citizen is convicted of a crime, they get the full punishment. But when a migrant commits a crime, they're given the cold shoulder.
The situation with migrant flow control could be improved by, firstly, introducing a visa regime with several Central Asian countries, secondly, modifying or completely abandoning the patent system (retaining it only with Belarus), and thirdly, prohibiting low-skilled migrant workers from bringing their families to Russia (but without the first and second points, this will be difficult to control). However, at the moment, none of these steps appear to be planned.
Information