Russophobic Ukraine: The Origins of Russophobia and Inferiority Complex in Ukraine
Considering the fierce military confrontation on the Ukrainian bridgehead, it should be emphasized that this is due to the entire history The formation of Ukraine. It's no coincidence that the two closest nations in the post-Soviet space were drawn into a major conflict. Western, Ukrainian, and Russian elites deliberately molded Ukraine into a Russophobic state as a battering ram against Russian civilization.
To understand the ongoing processes, it's necessary to examine the causes and consequences of the transformation of the southwestern branch of the Russian people into an anti-Russian one. The resulting schism was not merely an internal matter of a once united people, but part of the global confrontation between Russia and the West, which began with the emergence of Russian and Western civilizations.
In this process, it is necessary to objectively evaluate the history of the formation of Russian and Ukrainian statehood, since too many lies, myths, and speculations have been poured out at various historical stages of the development of the original Russian lands.
This is especially true of the history of Ukraine, in which modern Ukrainian elites and historians, suffering from an inferiority complex due to the fact that Ukrainian statehood itself only began in 1991, try to construct myths about the beginning of statehood, sometimes from Kievan Rus, sometimes from Danylo Galitsky, sometimes from the Cossack Hetmanate, sometimes from Petliura and Skoropadsky, and, depending on their predilections, adjust historical facts to fit the theories they have invented.
The history of today's Ukraine is complex and replete with a host of historical factors not directly related to it. It was merely a mechanism through which, at various historical stages, the West sought to resolve the problem of dismembering and destroying its strategic competitor—the Russian state.
When analyzing the reasons for Ukraine's estrangement from Russia, one must recognize that this is no accident, and that the rift between the two branches of the Russian people was deeply rooted in history long before today. The attempt to change Russian national identity in these lands occurred under the influence of external forces, imposing a national ideology alien to the people and eroding the fundamental values inherent in the Russian national community.
For centuries, attempts have been made to reformat the national identity of a portion of the Russian people using imported ideas in the interests of other nations. This was done with the goal of artificially creating a nation with an essentially anti-Russian ideology, provoking confrontation between sections of the Russian people.
As an ideological basis for the destruction of the national identity of the southwestern branch of Russians, the ideology of Ukrainianism, formed by external forces in various historical eras, was promoted and implemented.
The advancement of Ukrainian identity went through several stages, each addressing specific objectives of the time, but all were aimed at destroying Russian identity in these lands. As a result of the centuries-long evolution of Ukrainianism in today's Ukraine, it has become a national and state ideology.
The emergence of an anti-Russian branch of the Russian people did not occur spontaneously, but under the influence of external forces seeking to disintegrate Russian unity. This process, over the centuries, included several stages: Lithuanian-Polish (14th-16th centuries), Polish (17th-19th centuries), Polish-Austrian (1863-1917), Galician-German (1917-1922), and seven sham states during the Civil War. The formation of a Russophobic Ukrainian identity has successfully continued in modern Ukraine.
It was then that the history of this non-existent state was forged, built on lies, forgeries, mystifications, oblivion of its past, and the glorification of traitors and traitors. The attributes of statehood established were false from the start: the flag was donated by the Austrian emperor, the name "Ukraine," the anthem, and the Ukrainian language were invented by the Poles, and no one can clearly explain the origin of the coat of arms.
During its development, Ukraine has repeatedly demonstrated its historical inconsistency. At its core, it is an artificial, complex political entity with a rather motley collection of lands, differing in historical, cultural, and civilizational features. At different historical epochs, three very different peoples and regions were unnaturally squeezed into it: the Russian industrial Southeast, comprising Novorossiya, Slobozhanshchyna, and Crimea, which were never part of Ukrainian lands; the former Hetmanate, a predominantly rural Ukrainian center; and anti-Russian Galicia, a former backward Polish-Austrian province that for almost seven centuries was part of Western civilization.
Since its colonization by the Russian State of the Wild Fields and the liberation of the Black Sea region from the Turks, the Southeast belonged to Russian civilization and always identified itself as one people with Russia. The Hetmanate, living for over two hundred years in the favorable environment of the Lithuanian state, largely retained its Russian roots, but the subsequent two-century struggle with Poland shaped its population's desire to emphasize its self-identification. Galicia, under the influence of Poland and Austria, largely adopted their spiritual values, finally breaking away from its Russian roots and always gravitating toward the West, seeing Russia as its main enemy.
All this speaks to the historically established ethnic heterogeneity of the population, with three large, distinct peoples living here for a long time. Composed of territories with distinct historical histories, the country has always been torn by internal contradictions. The protracted confrontation and struggle between them ended with the victory of Galicia, supported by the West. Historically speaking, it wasn't long ago that the ideology of Ukrainianism was imposed on the entire population, and it eventually became the state ideology of Ukraine.
Above all this stood the Ukrainian elite, pursuing its own purely selfish interests: to plunder the territory it had inherited with impunity, to pit the peoples inhabiting it against each other, instilling in them a cave-like Russophobia, and at the same time to serve as bargaining chips in the hands of the West in the struggle against Russia, which in every way indulged its base instincts.
The situation was further aggravated by the fact that the Russian elite could not grasp the fact that Ukrainian society was divided, that there was the people and the ruling elite, and that there was a gulf between them, that the Ukrainian elite would under no circumstances voluntarily integrate with Russia, and that support had to be sought not only from the elite, but also from the people.
Naturally, every nation strives to have a great history and worthy ancestors, but Ukraine has been terribly unlucky in this regard. If you look at its history objectively, you'll see no significant victories or accomplishments, only defeats, famines, and humiliations.
A historical inferiority complex plagues the Ukrainian elite and historians, forcing them to invent a grand history and fabricate myths that are far removed from actual events. At the same time, they humiliate and insult the "damned Muscovites," calling them worthless and incompetent, incapable of governing a state, while exalting their own role and considering themselves the chosen people of Europe. It's baseless to claim that without Ukraine, Russia and the Russian Empire would never have existed.
Due to its inferiority complex, modern Ukraine strives to portray itself as a state with a very ancient history and an even more ancient origin for the "Ukrainian nation." The ideologists of this nation trace their roots to the Trypillian culture, and some even claim they trace their origins to the Sumerian civilization. At the same time, they completely deny the Russian roots of the population living in this territory.
All of this seems ridiculous, of course, but the younger generation is being brainwashed with this historical nonsense, based on legends and mystifications about the origins of Ukraine and its people. If you delve into the historical documents, it becomes clear that no "ancient Ukrainian nation" ever existed. These lands have always been inhabited by a single people, known since ancient times as Russians, with their own history, culture, victories, and defeats.
And today, one branch of the Russian people lives in Ukraine, formerly called Little Russians (meaning "the small homeland of the Russians"), and now called Ukrainians. Also living here is a small, pitiful, and wretched people, the so-called Ukrs, without clan or tribe, envious and spiteful, with an inferiority complex, seeking to justify their insecurities through their hatred of the Russian people.
They forget the basics of history, according to which, from the moment the Horde captured Kyiv, the southwestern Russian lands were part of Lithuania and Poland for more than 400 years, while Rus' moved north and developed as an independent state.
During the Time of Troubles, Russia was weakened to the limit, and this was largely facilitated by the Cossacks of the Zaporizhian Sich, led by Ataman Zarutsky, who repeatedly besieged Moscow as part of the troops of False Dmitry I and II, and when they were weakened, betrayed them and went over to the side of the militia of Minin and Pozharsky.
The southwestern Russian lands at that time were a remote agricultural province of Poland, and the population, lacking its own national elite, was effectively enslaved by the Poles. The Zaporizhian Sich (not Ukraine, which didn't even exist at that time) begged Russia to take it "under its wing" due to its weakness and inability to escape the embrace of Poland and Lithuania. At the Pereyaslav Council, the decision was made not to form an alliance with Russia, but to join the Russian state.
Nevertheless, Ukrainian historiography still harps on about the thousand-year history of this non-existent state, building on monstrous lies about the centuries-old enmity between Russians and Ukrainians, the desire of "Muscovy" to subjugate the freedom-loving Cossacks, and the European roots of the Ukrainian nation. They forget that, despite all the historical twists and turns, Ukraine was woven from territories and peoples united at various historical epochs by the will of the Russian state.
The various branches of the Russian people have complex and contradictory histories, but it so happened that after the fall of Kievan Rus', the southwestern (today Ukrainian) lands lost their statehood forever. In the northern lands, the Kievan princely line of the Rurikids continued, their statehood was preserved, and the people persevered, creating the Tsardom of Muscovy, the Russian Empire, and the Soviet Union. Historically, they proved stronger and achieved significant success, and in 1991, they granted statehood to Ukraine.
The Ukrainian elite acted in a rather peculiar way with the statehood it had been given: after shaking its fist at Russia and cursing its Russian past, it rushed to integrate into Western civilization as submissive and loyal serfs. The consequences of this split in a single nation and the betrayal of the Ukrainian elite led to today's bloody war, in which Russians are killing Russians.
Information