The brilliant Napoleonic cavalry commander Claude-Pierre Pajol

2 808 36
The brilliant Napoleonic cavalry commander Claude-Pierre Pajol

When it comes to the outstanding cavalry commanders of Napoleon Bonaparte's army, the first person who comes to mind is, of course, Joachim Murat. Napoleon himself said of him:

I have never seen a man braver, more determined, and more brilliant than him in cavalry charges.

And also:



Murat constantly showed brilliant courage and particular bravery in cavalry affairs... I only had to give the order, and Murat would instantly overthrow 4 or 5 thousand people in a given direction.


Patrick Courcelle and Jacques Girbal. Marshal Murat in Naples in 1813.

During the Hundred Days, the emperor rejected Murat's services, a decision he regretted. Recalling the famous Battle of Waterloo, he wrote:

We really missed him at certain points that day. Breaking through three or four English squares—Murat was made for that.

Less well-known as an outstanding cavalry commander was another Napoleonic marshal—Murat's fellow countryman, friend, and rival, Jean-Baptiste Bessières. Bonaparte held him in high esteem and ranked him alongside his brother-in-law, but he also pointed out the differences between them:

Bessières... was brave, cool, and remained calm under the heaviest fire. He had excellent eyesight and great skill in maneuvering cavalry. He was particularly adept at leading the cavalry reserve. He subsequently rendered the greatest service in all the major battles. He and Murat were the army's foremost cavalry commanders, but they possessed completely opposite qualities. Murat was a vanguard commander, impetuous and ebullient. Bessières possessed the qualities of a reserve officer, full of energy, yet cautious and prudent.


E. Meissonier. Equestrian portrait of Marshal Bessières

While we are on the subject of caution and prudence, it should be noted that it was Bessières who, during the Battle of Borodino, at the decisive moment when the question arose of bringing the Guard into battle, said to Napoleon:

Between us and France there is a whole Europe, we must preserve at least this handful of soldiers that we can count on.

Many other marshals, including Ney, Davout, and Murat, never forgave him for this remark. And Bessières, according to Ségur's testimony, was the first to advocate retreating from Maloyaroslavets. He became one of three Napoleonic marshals to die on the battlefield. Upon learning of his death, Bonaparte said:

Bessières lived like Bayard and died like Turenne.

However, few today remember such a cavalry commander as Claude-Pierre Pajol. Meanwhile, Bonaparte gives him a truly brilliant characterization:

There is no other cavalry general like Pajol; he not only knows how to fight, but also how to guard himself well and will never allow himself to be taken by surprise.

And even more:

Only Pajol among my generals knows how to lead cavalry.

Only Pajol! And this in the presence of such "masters" and masters of cavalry charges as the aforementioned Bessières and Murat.

Let us continue quoting Bonaparte:

If all my generals fought like Pajol, there would be no enemy in France.

But, as already noted, Pajol is known primarily to military historians. The fact is, this talented cavalry general never rose to the rank of marshal. He commanded a regiment, a brigade, and only in 1812 was he promoted to division, and in 1813, a corps. And throughout this time, he remained in the shadow of higher-ranking commanders, who took all the credit. Let's talk a little about him.

The origin and youth of the hero of the article


Claude-Pierre Pajol came from a fairly well-off bourgeois family. He was born in Besançon on February 3, 1772. Pajol's father was a respectable lawyer, and it was expected that Claude-Pierre would follow a similar path. However, the Revolution interrupted his career, forcing him to leave university and take an active part in anti-monarchist protests. This is not surprising, since the young Pajol, while not experiencing financial difficulties, was nevertheless a member of the Third Estate, which had no political rights.

Incidentally, during the storming of the Bastille, Claude-Pierre could have met another future Republican general, Lazare Hoche, whose adjutant he was to become.

The future Marshal, François Joseph Lefebvre, a miller's son and then a lieutenant, defended two elderly female relatives of Louis XVI from an enraged mob at the Château de Bellevue in February 1791. They were suspected of carrying sacks of gold. Lefebvre was even wounded in the ensuing scuffle, but he saved Lieutenant Colonel Berthier (the future indispensable chief of staff to Bonaparte), who nearly died in the ensuing brawl.

But let's return to the hero of the article, who at the end of October 1789 (at the age of 17) joined the Besançon National Guard as a private and by June 1, 1791, had risen to the rank of senior sergeant, and on August 21 of the same year transferred to the 1st battalion of the Doubs department.

On January 12, 1792, he received his first officer rank - he became a junior lieutenant in the 82nd Infantry Regiment.

Infantry service


The first battle in which Pajol took part was the famous Battle of Valmy (September 20, 1792): the French armies of the North under Dumouriez and the Centre (Moselle) under Kellermann stopped the troops of Charles Wilhelm Ferdinand of Brunswick.


The Battle of Valmy as painted by Horace Vernet

The army of the First Anti-French Coalition at the time included Prussian, Austrian, and Hessian regiments, as well as units of French émigrés. After the capture of the fortress of Longwy, even many French commanders doubted their success, believing that the inexperienced recruits would not withstand the onslaught of a professional enemy army. Colonel Bourreport, the French commandant of Verdun, shot himself to avoid the shame of capitulation—it was after this that the demoralized garrison of the fortress actually capitulated. However, after two unsuccessful attacks on the approaching Republican troops, the coalition army retreated. It remained near Valmy for another 10 days, but did not dare to re-enter the battle.

The Battle of Valmy became the first victorious engagement for the new republican forces, and the following day, the decision was made to abolish the monarchy in France. On September 30, 1792, Pajol led a grenadier column that stormed Speyer and was wounded for the first time—two bayonet stabs to his left arm. He underwent lengthy recovery. Finally, on April 10, 1793, he was assigned to the garrison of Mainz, where he was wounded again during the siege of that city in August 1793. In 1794, after the Battle of Hochheim, Pajol was promoted to captain and on June 21 became adjutant to General Kléber. On June 26, he took part in the famous Battle of Fleurus, which brought fame and made General Jourdan a national hero. In September of that year, during the Battle of the Ourthe River, Pajol captured the Austrian flag.

On February 16, 1795, he was appointed company commander of the 6th Demi-Brigade of Light Infantry, reporting first to Lefebvre and then to Ney. Finally, on July 23, 1797, Pajol was transferred to the cavalry, becoming a squadron commander in the 4th Hussar Regiment.

Cavalry commander


After this, Pajol took part in the battles of Altenkirchen, Wetzlar, Uckerath, Neuheim, and Friedberg. He particularly distinguished himself at Este (where he was wounded again) and Aldenhofen, where he personally captured two flags. That same year, 1797, Pajol briefly served as aide-de-camp to the extremely popular General Lazare Hoche, before being appointed to the position by General Masséna. Pajol continued to command individual units and played a major role during Jourdan's unsuccessful Battle of Ostrach (March 21, 1799): leading two hussar squadrons, he managed to temporarily halt the Austrians' advance.

In the subsequent Battle of Stockach (March 25, 1799, also unsuccessful for the French), Pajol, leading the same squadrons, managed to capture soldiers from one of the enemy battalions. He himself narrowly escaped capture, however, as, while pursuing the retreating Austrians, he became separated from his hussars and lost his horse to an enemy bullet. Rising from the ground, Pajol managed to seize the horse of an Austrian dragoon, on which he continued the fight. Pajol also had to fight his way through the encircling Austrians at Waldkirch.

After a series of failures, Jourdan was replaced as commander by Masséna. On May 27, General Tarraud, subordinate to this future marshal, lost the Battle of Winterthur. Pajol's horse was again killed, and this time he was captured (and stripped naked by the Austrians who robbed him), but was immediately freed by his hussars. He had to continue the battle in his underwear, which did not prevent the hero of this article from effectively covering the retreat of General Gazan's brigade.

Incidentally, in this same battle, Michel Ney, who had recently become a general, was seriously wounded.

The defeat at Winterthur opened the way for the Austrian Archduke Charles to Zurich, which he captured on June 6. Masséna found himself in dire straits. He was saved by the Austrian Emperor, who unexpectedly ordered the withdrawal of his troops from Switzerland. The situation had changed radically. Just recently, Masséna had been a hunted animal; now he had become the hunter: he attacked and routed the Russian corps of General A. Rimsky-Korsakov and a small detachment of Austrian Field Marshal Lieutenant Johann Gotze. Suvorov was forced to abandon his plans for a march on Paris and change his army's route through the Alps.


André Masséna, painted by François Bouchot, during the Battle of Zurich, September 25, 1799.

For his actions in Switzerland, Masséna received the official title of "Savior of the Fatherland" and the unofficial nickname l'Enfant chéri de la Victoire ("precious child of Victory").

Meanwhile, on July 10, 1799, Pajol was promoted to colonel and became commander of the 6th Hussar Regiment, which had recently suffered such losses in the Battle of Novi (against Suvorov's army) that the hero of the article had to essentially re-form it. This regiment became part of Jean-Victor Moreau's army and participated in the battles of Neresheim, Neuburg, and the great Battle of Hohenlinden (December 3, 1800), which military historians consider equal to Austerlitz, and Bonaparte called the victory one of the greatest in world warfare. stories.


General Moreau during the Battle of Hohenlinden in a painting by Henri Frederic Chopin

However, even earlier, after Moreau’s victories at Möskirch and Höchstädt, Bonaparte wrote to him:

I would gladly exchange the purple robe of the First Consul for the epaulettes of the brigade commander under your command.

But let's return to the subject of this article, who, during Bonaparte's Second Italian Campaign, distinguished himself in the unsuccessful Battle of Babenhausen. Pajol's 6th Hussar Regiment, leading the rearguard, was temporarily surrounded by the Austrians but managed to break through to Waldkirch. Napoleon himself recognized the subject's actions, awarding him the insignia of a Grand Officer of the Legion of Honor.

In 1805, Pajol and his regiment were part of Marmont's 2nd Corps. He was in the vanguard at the Battle of Weyer, then fought in the battles of Ulm and Leoben. Pajol's greatest success was capturing the bridge over the Enns River at Altenmarkt. In December 1806, his regiment was transferred to Italy. Finally, on March 1, 1807, the subject of this article received his first general's rank, and on May 14, he became commander of a light cavalry brigade in General Lasalle's division. This brigade included the 5th and 7th Hussar Regiments and the 3rd Horse Chasseurs (and in September 1897, the 11th Horse Chasseurs). In literature, this brigade is often called the "Hellish" brigade (La brigade infernale).

At this time, the subject of this article was already 35 years old—a career not particularly remarkable for the French army of that time. Jean Schramme became a general at 23, Napoleon Bonaparte at 24, Lazare Hoche at 25, and Barthélemy Joubert at 26. Laurent Gouvion Saint-Cyr rose from private to general in two years (1792–1794), and Nicolas Jean de Dieu Soult in three (1791–1794). It took Pajol 18 years to become a general. However, he was still younger than the average general in the French army: their average age was 39.

In the next article we will continue and finish our story.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    2 August 2026 05: 25
    Thank you for the article. Informative.
  2. +1
    2 August 2026 05: 42
    Revolutions bring heroes to the forefront. Counterrevolutions, however, bring out scum, scoundrels, and villains like Chubais, Berezovsky, Serdyuk and his women, and other antiheroes of our time. Many of whom continue to steal and thrive.
    1. +7
      2 August 2026 05: 49
      Quote: vet
      Revolutions bring heroes to the forefront. Counterrevolutions, on the other hand, bring out scum, scoundrels, and villains like Chubais, Berezovsky, and Serdyuk and his women.
      They consider themselves revolutionaries...)
    2. +3
      2 August 2026 10: 35
      Quote: vet
      Revolutions bring heroes to the forefront. Counterrevolutions, on the other hand, bring out scum, scoundrels, and villains like Chubais and Berezovsky.

      Naive idealism. The Jacobins who rose to the forefront after the revolution and drenched their country in blood—who are they? Heroes or scoundrels?
      Or maybe it's not that simple...
      1. -1
        2 August 2026 11: 41
        It's clear that there's always some kind of "foam." And during revolutions, both opportunists, careerists, and thick-headed fanatics try to climb to the top. It's a common thread. That's when the country needed soldiers: under Lenin's successor, Stalin, queues formed at the military recruitment offices; under Yeltsin's successor, Putin, queues formed at the Verkhniy Lars crossing and other similar "gaps," through which the "cockroaches" raised by counterrevolutionaries fled the country they had betrayed. Under Lenin and Stalin, that cannot be denied, they built. Under Yeltsin and Putin, they mostly destroyed. Under Putin, after all, they destroyed a lot, too. They destroyed many industries, for example, aircraft manufacturing. The army's top brass rotted, defense enterprises closed, and others deteriorated, as the SVO clearly demonstrated. Because after the revolution, for the most part, the country entered an era of "bright" people, while the counterrevolution of Yeltsin and his successors paved the way for the "dark."
        1. +1
          2 August 2026 15: 43
          Quote: vet
          That's when the country needed soldiers: under Lenin's successor, Stalin, queues formed at the military registration and enlistment offices; under Yeltsin's successor, Putin, queues formed at the Verkhniy Lars crossing.

          And again, a primitive view. There were no more deserters in WWII, but there simply wasn't the opportunity to escape abroad.
          Quote: vet
          Yeltsin's counterrevolution

          Was that really a "counterrevolution"? Do you even remember the late USSR? Those rotten faces of the Politburo members, the shifty eyes of the windbag MSG, and the complete impotence of the authorities?
          Colleague Kuntsev is absolutely right, the democrats considered themselves to be "revolutionaries"...
          1. 0
            2 August 2026 20: 15
            These pseudo-democrats could believe whatever they wanted. But they strove for power under counterrevolutionary slogans. "The private sector will feed everyone." "The market will solve all problems." "Let's lower prices: those who don't adapt will be left to die." Doctors, teachers, and kindergarten teachers are "not needed," they don't need to be paid; let them go to the bazaar to sell Turkish clothes. It still seems to erupt, like Medvedev's blurt to the students of a pedagogical university: "There's no money for you, go into business." What's on the mind of a smart person is on the tongue of you-know-who.
            1. +3
              3 August 2026 07: 26
              Quote: vet
              But they strove for power under counterrevolutionary slogans: "The private sector will feed everyone." "The market will solve all problems." "Let's lower prices: those who don't adapt will be left to die."

              That is, you don't remember...
              When they were striving for power The slogans were completely different. And, in my opinion, they (the slogans) were quite reasonable, which is why the people supported them en masse. The fight against the privileges of the party nomenklatura, the de-partyization of government bodies at all levels, free elections to these very bodies on an alternative basis, and many other wonderful things.
              From strengthening sovereignty to increasing pensions.
              That's the point, they always promise one thing, but in reality it turns out to be something completely different.
          2. -3
            3 August 2026 07: 29
            Don't you think how pathetic you look? You, who have broken, destroyed, sold, and betrayed everything possible, turning a superpower into a pathetic source of natural resources for the world, and then you talk about the "ROT FACES OF POLITBURO MEMBERS"? There's no limit to your hypocrisy.
            1. +2
              3 August 2026 12: 18
              So the fact that these same "rotten mugs" with their (in)actions brought the country to the point where everyone (literally) turned their backs on them doesn't bother you. Just as the fact that in the richest country in the world, people suddenly started lining up for the most basic necessities doesn't bother you either. And all this happened without any war or capitalist aggression.
              But Ivan Valerievich suddenly turned out to be to blame))) good
              1. +2
                3 August 2026 12: 42
                Quote: Trapper7
                But Ivan Valerievich suddenly turned out to be to blame)))

                Well, who else? request
                It's impossible to admit that the CPSU has degenerated and is incapable of anything other than plundering state property.
              2. -2
                3 August 2026 20: 12
                Read about the "foreman of perestroika," Yakovlev. This scoundrel openly explained how the country was destroyed. And where did the queues and those Glasnost-related fairy tales come from that some foolish people still repeat to this day? And the strangest thing is that Politburo members died in lines for pension recalculations, not in their villas on the Côte d'Azur.
            2. +3
              3 August 2026 12: 41
              Quote: oleg Pesotsky
              Don't you think how pathetic you look?

              Quote: oleg Pesotsky
              You who broke, destroyed, sold

              Me personally?! belay
              Lately, I've been learning more and more about myself on Topvar. One time, I edited Wikipedia to spite Bayard, and now I've destroyed a superpower while serving my military service...
              Quote: oleg Pesotsky
              about the "ROT FACES OF THE POLITBURO MEMBERS"?

              Why don’t I have the right to condemn the political bankrupts who brought our country to ruin?
              Quote: oleg Pesotsky
              There is no limit to hypocrisy.

              Especially yours!
              1. +2
                3 August 2026 13: 48
                Quote: Senior Sailor
                He destroyed a superpower while serving in the military...

                A terrible person. What else can I say?
  3. +2
    2 August 2026 05: 43
    As for the article - like the previous ones (about Gauche and Pichegru) - it is an excellent continuation of the long-standing series about Napoleon's marshals, but now about generals.
  4. +2
    2 August 2026 06: 24
    Perhaps the only one of all the senior commanders (including Napoleon himself) in Napoleon's army whose genius cannot be dismissed as a failure to overcome the romantic myths of the 19th century is Claude-Pierre Pozhal. To be seriously wounded in almost every battle, win it, and then return to duty—and all of this is not myth but fact—few have had such a military fate. Well, perhaps only those who are also capable of commanding their own destinies.
  5. +4
    2 August 2026 06: 52
    To win I need a little more troops and less Besiers.
    Marshal Massena
    1. VLR
      +6
      2 August 2026 08: 32
      He wasn't referring to Bessières's military leadership. Masséna's adjutant, A. Marbot, describes this episode:
      "At this time, Masséna, wishing to consolidate his victory, sent an adjutant to General Lepic, who was in reserve with the Guard cavalry, with orders to attack. But the brave Lepic, biting the blade of his saber in despair, replied with pain that his immediate superior, Marshal Bessières, had categorically forbidden him to send his units into battle without his own orders... Immediately, ten adjutants were sent in different directions to search for Bessières, but he, who had been relentlessly following Masséna for several days, disappeared, of course, not out of cowardice - he was a very brave man, - but out of calculation or envy of his comrade. Without thinking at all about the highest interests of France, he did not want to send a single one of his soldiers to ensure a victory that would have gone to Massena».

      That's when Massena said:
      "To win, I need more troops and fewer Bessieres."
      1. VLR
        +4
        2 August 2026 08: 44
        Napoleon's marshals couldn't stand each other. During the Battle of Essling-Aspern, Lannes and Bessières nearly fell upon each other with swords, and Masséna separated them (also attested to by Marbot).
        1. +2
          2 August 2026 15: 06
          The situation there was somewhat similar: Bessières also tried to evade Lannes's order to attack. But in this case, he was forced to attack.
          Upon learning of this incident, Napoleon summoned both of them. He sided with Lannes and criticized Bessières. What the Emperor said to Bessières remains unknown, but the following morning the Duke of Istria personally appeared before Lannes for orders.
          Saint-Cyr, while still a general, failed to assist Oudinot in 1812. On August 16, when the main forces of the Grande Armée, led by Napoleon, stormed Smolensk, Wittgenstein attacked the French near Polotsk and achieved success. Meanwhile, Saint-Cyr offered no assistance to Oudinot and, according to Marbot, merely "followed Oudinot, and when Oudinot asked his opinion, he bowed and limited himself to the words: 'Your Excellency, Monsieur Marshal!' This was meant to mean: 'Since you have been promoted to marshal, you must know more about everything than I, a mere general, so handle the situation as best you can!'"
        2. +3
          2 August 2026 19: 14
          "they couldn't stand each other," and Napoleon even set them against each other.
          Actually, this is an interesting point: the personal relationships of Napoleon's commanders; why did Napoleon allow this?
          1. 0
            3 August 2026 07: 29
            Quote: vladcub
            Why did Napoleon allow this?

            divide et impera - divide and conquer.
            Firstly, as long as they are at odds, they will definitely not be able to conspire.
            Secondly, wanting to curry favor, they will try to do his the matter is as good as possible.
            1. +1
              4 August 2026 13: 30
              Ivan, you're right. Napoleon won in everything: Jourdan, Bernadotte, and Murat weren't exactly friends, so they kept an eye on each other.
  6. +4
    2 August 2026 07: 07
    There was also the famous General Lasalle, who deserves at least a mention.
    1. +4
      2 August 2026 18: 52
      True, Lassalle is worthy of being remembered.
  7. +2
    2 August 2026 09: 08
    Thanks for the article. However, Napoleon had another cavalryman, General Davout, who is now little known. By the start of the Revolution, Davout was already a cavalry officer, quickly rose to the rank of general, and successfully commanded a cavalry division in the Egyptian campaign. He later became a combined arms commander, as which he became famous.
  8. +3
    2 August 2026 18: 51
    Valery, as always, you have an interesting job.
    Back then, it was a crazy time: instant takeoff or instant collapse.
    To succeed in a military career, one had to be both fiercely brave and prudent. Being a demagogue didn't hurt either.
    Once again, I repeat, "it was a crazy time.
  9. +2
    2 August 2026 19: 03
    Jean Bessieres, I know almost nothing about him, only somewhere his name flashed among other marshals.
    It would be good if Valery told about him.
    1. VLR
      +2
      2 August 2026 20: 25
      Good evening. In 2022, I unexpectedly wrote a series of articles about Napoleon's marshals—one after another, they were "clung to." O'Davout, for example, wrote on the beach in Hurghada, I think. It's time to combine these articles into a book. :) They were well received and actively discussed. Here are two articles about Bessières—the beginning and the continuation:

      https://topwar.ru/191132-marshal-besser-zemljak-drug-i-sopernik-mjurata.html


      https://topwar.ru/191259-marshal-besser-ot-triumfa-austerlica-do-gibeli-bliz-rippaha.html?ysclid=msc2cz1m5d83633481

      I'll think about Lassalle, who was mentioned here in the comments, and perhaps write about him.
      But after the second article about Pajol, let's change the topic for now.
      1. +3
        4 August 2026 13: 37
        Valery, thank you for your promise.
        Regarding Besser, I'll have to look into it.
        1. +1
          5 August 2026 08: 07
          I looked through the articles about Bessières again. And I enjoyed reading the comments again. The second part also includes a section on Cahors wine! wink
  10. -1
    3 August 2026 07: 32
    Conan Doyle has a wonderful series of stories, "The Exploits and Adventures of Brigadier Gerard." It tells the story of a hussar colonel in Napoleon's French army. I believe Conan Doyle based his character on the character in this article.
    1. +4
      3 August 2026 08: 22
      Gerard's prototype was Marbot.
      1. +1
        3 August 2026 20: 15
        Gerard was a composite character, but I'm glad that at least someone still remembers this series of wonderful stories.
        1. +2
          4 August 2026 14: 37
          "Gerard was a composite character" – the basis was Marbot's memoirs, but, of course, it's a composite character. When I recently read Lejeune, I couldn't shake the feeling that some of this was already familiar. Moreover, in 1912, a magnificent seven-volume work, "The Patriotic War of 1812 and Russian Society," was published. It was written with great skill. And in the article on the French army of 1812, it's very clear that the author was familiar with Marbot; some of the examples are clearly taken from his memoirs.
        2. +2
          4 August 2026 14: 39
          Conan Doyle is a wonderful writer in general; his works about Holmes are not the only ones that are excellent.