"Tango" took off with a Russian engine: the end of the era of imported engines in small aircraft?

9 902 60
"Tango" took off with a Russian engine: the end of the era of imported engines in small aircraft?
The Tango prototype at the NAIS 2025 exhibition. Photo: Wikimedia Commons


Domestic aviation The industry continues work on the advanced Spectra PV-10 Tango trainer aircraft. The aircraft has begun flight testing and undergone modifications. According to the developer's plans, testing should be completed, after which the aircraft will enter production, and production of the main components will begin in parallel. The serial production schedule remains a mere plan, as everything depends on certification and orders. We'll come back to this later.



From idea to prototype


As a reminder, development of the future Tango training aircraft began in October 2022. Spectra Aircraft, a member of the S7 Group, is leading the project. The S.A. Chaplygin Siberian Research Institute of Aviation (SibNIA) has been brought in to assist with the work. The institute is responsible for scientific and technical support, composite airframe strength calculations, aerodynamics, and some flight testing. This organization, with extensive experience working with domestic aircraft, mitigates the risks associated with implementing new composite technologies in the training aircraft.

The development of the first version of the design and construction of the prototype aircraft took two years. A full-scale mockup was unveiled in August 2023. The company then began assembling the full-scale prototype. Spektra built a production facility in the village of Troparevo (Moscow Region) for this purpose.

The completed aircraft was delivered to Torbeevo Airfield near Moscow. In 2024, preparations and ground tests were conducted there. On September 21 of that year, the first flight took place. The training aircraft took off under the control of SibNIA First Class Test Pilot Vladimir Barsuk. Within minutes, the prototype demonstrated its basic flight and maneuverability characteristics.

New test flights followed. Simultaneously, refinements were made, taking into account accumulated experience and the need to replace some components. The main results of this work were recently presented.


Aircraft parts production. Photo: Telegram / AviaNews

During the upgrade, the Tango received a new powerplant based on the APD-520 "Lider" engine, currently in prototype form. The aircraft's first flight in this configuration took place on July 14, 2026. After replacing key components, the aircraft reportedly maintained its stated performance.

According to the developer, this flight marks the beginning of the certification testing program. The updated version of the UTS must confirm all parameters and then receive the necessary approvals. This is a configuration specifically prepared for certification, and whether it will be retained in full in production has not yet been officially confirmed.

Production plans


The Spectra Tango was designed as a training aircraft for military and civil aviation pilots. It is expected to eventually replace a number of legacy aircraft and improve training efficiency through its innovative technology.

There's a nuance here. Military and civil certification requirements differ. Civil aviation requires certification through the Federal Air Transport Agency, while military training centers require separate approvals and inspections based on departmental standards. A single platform doesn't automatically guarantee access to all segments, and each area will require separate work.

The developer repeatedly emphasized the project's relative simplicity and the possibility of implementing it within a short timeframe. Rough plans were also provided.

For example, mid-last year, Spectra Aircraft announced it would build three new trainers in the coming months. These were intended to be part of the company's fleet and serve various missions. Whether this plan was met remains unknown.


First flight tests, September 2024. Photo: Telegram / Aviation Mezzanine

According to last year's plans, serial production should begin by the end of 2026. The company stated that capacity is designed to assemble up to 20 Tangos per year, but it did not specify whether production would be expanded.

Serial Spectra Tangos will be equipped with domestically produced APD-520 engines. In May 2025, S7 Group revealed its plans for these engines. The plan was to launch production in 2026, with at least 30 engines expected to be assembled in the first year to create a base for serial production of the training aircraft.

It's worth comparing the numbers. According to data from the Russian Ministry of Transport, announced in late 2024, domestic educational institutions require approximately 240 aircraft of this class. At the stated annual production rate of 20 aircraft, meeting this demand alone would take more than a decade, and only if the entire output were to go to educational institutions and not the company's own fleet. This means either production will have to increase, or we'll be talking about partially meeting demand. However, this hasn't yet become a direct request: last year, Rosaviatsiya only reported initial consultations with Spektra, and no agency has signed any firm contracts.

Technical features


The PV-10 Tango is a light single-engine trainer aircraft that can also be used as a light passenger aircraft. This explains the unusual four-seat cockpit for a trainer: two seats are occupied by the instructor and trainee, with the remaining two available for passengers or cargo. The design incorporates solutions that simplify production and improve flight performance.


First takeoff with a domestic engine. Photo: Spectra Aircraft

The aircraft is built using a conventional aerodynamic design: a fuselage with a spacious cabin, a low-wing design, and a traditional tail. The airframe is made almost entirely of composites, which reduced weight while maintaining strength.

"Tango" has small dimensions and weight:
  • length - 8,2 m;
  • wing span - 12 m;
  • take-off weight - no more than 1200 kg.


The powerplant is located in the forward fuselage. The first prototype was equipped with a Belgian UL Power 520is. The aircraft was then upgraded to the domestic APD-520—a six-cylinder, air-cooled engine producing 200 hp with a three-bladed propeller. The switch was not accompanied by any claims of significant performance changes, so it is logical to assume that the flight performance with both engines is similar. No separate comparative figures for each engine have been officially released.

Flight characteristics (declared, may be updated as certification progresses):
  • maximum speed - not less than 245 km/h;
  • cruising speed - 220 km/h;
  • ceiling - 4000 m;
  • maximum flight range - not less than 1100 km;
  • takeoff and landing distance - no more than 500-550 m.


The pilot's station is equipped with all the necessary instruments for system monitoring, navigation, and control. The equipment is designed for initial training and solo flights.

A place in its class


What kind of aircraft is this compared to the others? The Tango is similar in size and mission to the Yak-152, but it stands out with its composite airframe, four-seat cockpit, and multi-role capabilities, serving both as a trainer and a transport aircraft. On the one hand, it's designed for basic military training and civilian educational programs, while on the other, it's designed for light transport. There's nothing unique about it: it's a domestically produced aircraft for a long-established niche of lightweight composite trainers with a glass cockpit and fuel-efficient piston engine. And this is actually a plus: a clear niche means clear requirements and fewer surprises during development.


The first flight with a domestic engine is complete. Photo: Spectra Aircraft

Ratings and conditions


The bottom line for today: Tango has passed the main stages of testing, and if certification is successful, production could begin in the foreseeable future.

Separate story With an engine. Initially, the Tango flew with a Belgian UL Power 520is. For a training aircraft intended for Russian flight schools, dependence on an imported engine, given sanctions and unreliable supply chains, poses a direct risk, as maintenance and supplies can be disrupted at any moment. Hence the importance of the APD-520 "Lider": its own engine eliminates dependence on imported supplies and makes production schedules predictable, allowing for mass training planning without relying on external suppliers.

If it goes into production, the benefits are clear. A modern training system will be created to help train military and civilian pilots. At the same time, the project will demonstrate that such aircraft can be built in Russia not only by large, established design bureaus, but also by young companies. And it's especially valuable that everything—the airframe and engine—is being developed from scratch.

There are, however, two bottlenecks. The first is obvious: the engine. Until the APD-520 is fully developed and certified, it's too early to talk about production, and any delay in the engine will delay the aircraft's delivery. The second, more pressing, problem is the lack of orders. Government agencies' interest is currently limited to consultations and needs assessments, and until long-term commitments from flight schools and specialized agencies are secured, trial operation will not evolve into a sustainable production run. Once contracts are secured, the aircraft's commercial prospects will become clearer.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    22 July 2026 04: 31
    I wonder what the fuel consumption of the Belgian engine that was originally installed on the plane is? I just searched and couldn't find anything. Our APD-520 "Lider" has it in the specifications, but there's some mystery about the Belgian one.
    1. IVZ
      +2
      22 July 2026 06: 21
      But there's some kind of mystery about the Belgian one.
      The engine is a complete analogue of the Belgian UL Power 520is motor with identical characteristics[4].
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/АПД-520?ysclid=mrvikw6zn6571017682
      1. +6
        22 July 2026 07: 29
        APD-250, also known as the Belgian UL520iS. Piston A 200-horsepower engine. They're trying to localize (copy) it, and if they can, they'll definitely be doing a great job.
  2. -8
    22 July 2026 04: 32
    What if we put a couple of machine guns in the wings and shoot down aircraft-type drones?
    1. 0
      23 July 2026 02: 24
      And after the detonation of the drone's warhead, collect the aircraft debris on the ground.
      This is essentially not just a light training aircraft, but also a light commercial or even family aircraft. Like a car, only with wings and no road required. Given the size of our country and the availability and condition of roads beyond the Urals, it's a good personal transport option for local airlines. If it passes certification and proves its performance, demonstrates reliability at an affordable price, it could become a mass-market and even "people's" aircraft.
      1. 0
        23 July 2026 03: 11
        Quote: bayard
        And after the detonation of the drone's warhead, collect the aircraft debris on the ground.

        What, when fighter aircraft shot down bombers during WWII, did they all immediately go into a stupor?
        1. 0
          23 July 2026 03: 32
          Fighters shot down bombers by targeting the cockpit, engines, and wings with fuel tanks. But attempts to shoot down German V-1s often ended in tragedy, just as the Sumerians tried to shoot down our Geranis with machine guns from helicopters and light aircraft. And this little plane's speed is low, almost as fast as enemy UAVs. It won't work as an interceptor. For that, you'd need your own Super Tucano.
          1. -1
            23 July 2026 14: 10
            There's no need for a Super Tucano. If we were to adapt any aircraft for a drone fighter, it would be the twin-engine TVRS-44 Ladoga.
            1. 0
              23 July 2026 14: 35
              Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
              If any aircraft were to be adapted for use as a drone fighter, it would be the twin-engine TVRS-44 Ladoga.

              Well, it's a bit heavy... Even the L-410 is probably a bit heavy, although it's closer to what we're looking for. I understand that the front tractor propeller interferes with the normal operation of the radar or the radar, and a light twin-engine one would be more interesting and convenient, but we don't have any of those yet.
              However, there are already VK-650 and VK-800 turboshaft engines, so they might appear. But it's definitely not anytime soon. Right now, such engines are needed for the Ka-226 and Ansat, and in large numbers. But such planes are also in great demand for local aviation. Maybe they will appear, if we don't fall into a world war.
      2. 0
        10 August 2026 00: 49
        Quote: bayard
        If it passes certification and confirms its characteristics, demonstrates reliability at an acceptable price, it could become widespread and even "popular".

        It costs about $1 million, three times more than a new Cessna in the US. Even dollar millionaires in Russia can't afford to buy and maintain a piston-engine aircraft, let alone anyone else.
    2. +1
      25 July 2026 15: 02
      Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
      What if we put a couple of machine guns in the wings and shoot down aircraft-type drones?

      For starters, it has such a speed that intercepting drones could happen purely by accident, but even if it does happen,
      How many shots from this pair of machine guns can the airframe of this insect withstand? You see, an aircraft airframe capable of carrying machine guns or cannons can't be equipped with an engine with a measly 200 hp; it's simply too light and flimsy.
  3. -6
    22 July 2026 05: 15
    Well, for me, it would be better to have a Chinese diesel engine adapted from a Haval H9 and a Webasto, or a boiler for warming up and starting, like they do in Gay Europe with Prices, they install a diesel engine from a MB.
  4. 0
    22 July 2026 05: 21
    In terms of takeoff and landing performance, it's close to the An-2. If the Tango uses only Russian materials and an engine, then honor and praise go to Cheplygin and the S7. It's ideal as a training aircraft. It can also be used for air ambulances and forest protection. Every flight training institution needs one. The real need is at least two to three thousand of these aircraft. If the PO-2 could fight, the Tango will certainly be useful in military aviation. hi
    1. +2
      22 July 2026 05: 40
      Quote: V.
      In terms of takeoff and landing characteristics, it's close to the An-2. If the Tango uses only Russian materials and an engine, then honor and praise be given.

      In the 35 years since the collapse of the country, capitalism has only managed to create "Tango" to replace "Anton".
      When during this time the Chinese are in space, as if they were at home, and I won’t even mention aviation, if, starting with our slippers, everything is “Made in China”.
      1. +7
        22 July 2026 05: 59
        The Mi-4 was created under Stalin in a year... Stalin approved the deadlines, and of course, they met them...
        1. +7
          22 July 2026 13: 43
          Quote: Hagakure
          The Mi-4 was created in a year under Stalin...

          For a serial, well-tuned engine - why not. smile
          The main problem facing our aircraft designers is precisely their engines. How many aircraft with no equivalents in the world have been ruined because the engine either never made it past the prototype stage or failed to deliver the stated performance.
          1. 0
            22 July 2026 14: 42
            Sorry, I don't know the details... But the timeframe is impressive, especially since it was created, essentially, from scratch.
          2. +1
            22 July 2026 20: 41
            It is worth remembering that the gearbox in a helicopter is no less complex than the engine itself.
          3. 0
            23 July 2026 12: 49
            The main problem of our aircraft designers is precisely the engines.
            But when you have engines, the problems don't go away. There are engines for the Tu-214, there are engines for the Il-76, but the former are nonexistent, and the latter are available at a teaspoon a year. There's nothing to talk about the Tu-214R and A-100. request
          4. 0
            10 August 2026 00: 52
            There was no need to shut down the production of the AI-14; it was still going strong in the late 90s, but they decided that the Russian Federation didn't need small aircraft.
      2. + 11
        22 July 2026 06: 28
        SibNIA is struggling to preserve Soviet and later Russian aviation. What does it cost to modernize the Yak-40, a composite version of the An-2 turboprop, and modernize the simpler An-2?
        S7 didn't come to anyone else, but to the Chaplygin team, realizing that only they could design and complete the aircraft in such a short timeframe. And how many other projects does SibNIA have that we don't know about, but which could move Russia forward?
        If we want to wear our own slippers and fly our own planes, then we need to make them and allocate funds to professionals like the Chaplyginites, not to budget embezzlers. hi
        I envy the Chinese with a white envy and want us to work no worse than they do. hi
        1. 0
          23 July 2026 02: 52
          To work "no worse than them," we first need to equalize the basic conditions - cheap credit, a light/non-suffocating tax burden, state protectionism, and the execution of officials for corruption and tyranny.
          Remove DyR@k0v from power and introduce medical cognitive and psychiatric evaluations before appointments. DyR@k's will certainly resist, but after being issued a "white ticket with a yellow stripe," they will be assigned to herd goats in remote fields and sew slippers no worse than the Chinese. When everyone minds their own business, there will be slippers, goat milk, airplanes, and rockets. Because DyR@k's are obliged to herd goats, sew slippers, and sweep the streets. And the smart ones will build airplanes, rockets, govern the state, and command armies.
          - And what about us?
          - And here it's like in the book about Buratino. Have you heard about the amazing country where they buried gold in the ground on the Field of Miracles? A prophetic book.
      3. 0
        4 August 2026 10: 43
        Antonov himself couldn't create a replacement for the An-2. When did the Soviet Union stop producing the An-2? And since then, nothing has been created to replace it.
    2. -6
      22 July 2026 06: 02
      In terms of characteristics, the Tango is closer to the Gerani than to the AN-2. The age of manned aviation is long gone.
      1. +1
        22 July 2026 13: 04
        Quote: ism_ek
        The age of manned aviation is long gone.

        Tell the Americans and Canadians about this.
    3. 0
      23 July 2026 11: 39
      Quote: V.
      Every flight training institution needs it.

      I don't understand why a training center needs four seats? Usually, it's two: a student and an instructor. Isn't it expensive to transport two empty seats?

      [/quote]The domestic aviation industry continues work on a promising training aircraft Spectra PV-10 Tango. [Quote]

      The project is being developed by Spectra Aircraft,
      Is this really a domestic industry?
      1. 0
        23 July 2026 23: 58
        The PV-10 Tango from Spectra Aircraft, of course, is ours. And it has two seats, it's a cargo-passenger aircraft, so there's room for suitcases.
        1. -1
          24 July 2026 09: 48
          Quote: Spiidii
          PV-10 Tango by Spectra Aircraft, well, of course, our own.

          How do you prove it?
          Quote: Spiidii
          and two seats, it is a cargo-passenger, so there is somewhere to put suitcases.

          There's no argument there. But what does the training system have to do with it? It, by law, should have two seats and dual controls.
          1. 0
            24 July 2026 21: 35
            Are you one of those who needs to write: be careful with sarcasm?
  5. +8
    22 July 2026 05: 23
    There will be a series, and there will be a discussion, that is, an assessment. For now, just words. As Rosaviatsiya shows, certification can drag on for years and end in nothing. Manturov's school.
    1. + 11
      22 July 2026 06: 10
      So far, the entire article is about the future. We've read enough of these advances on VO. Everything will be, will be, will be... When will I see an article about something that's already been done, that's been put into production?
    2. -2
      23 July 2026 11: 50
      Quote: avia12005
      As Rosaviatsiya demonstrates, certification can drag on for years and ultimately fail. The Manturov School.

      I'm even sure that this is how it will be.
      "...domestic educational institutions require approximately 240 aircraft of this class."
      "There are two bottlenecks, however. The first is obvious—the engine. The second is more difficult—there are no orders.
      Why aren't there any orders? The potential client has no money. The government has funds for cultural and entertainment centers, schools, and so on in various Kyrgyz, Tajik, and other countries, but, as always, it lacks for its own development.
  6. -3
    22 July 2026 05: 45
    A major operational advantage is that the APD-520 runs on kerosene, which is readily available at any airfield. This means it's an aviation diesel engine. Starting, warming up, and afterburning before shutting down are all accomplished using B-70 aviation gasoline, also produced in Russia. What can I say? Well done!
    1. +7
      22 July 2026 07: 32
      Quote: disthim
      A major operational advantage is that the APD-520 runs on kerosene, which is readily available at any airfield. This means it's an aviation diesel engine. Starting, warming up, and afterburning before shutting down are all accomplished using B-70 aviation gasoline, also produced in Russia. What can I say? Well done!

      The ULPower UL520iS aircraft engine runs on motor gasoline (MOGAS) with an octane rating of at least 97 RON (equivalent to Russian AI-98) or aviation gasoline (AVGAS), also known as APD-250
      1. +1
        23 July 2026 08: 00
        I reread the article again. It clearly states that the aircraft is equipped with an APD-520 engine.
    2. +3
      22 July 2026 08: 34
      Unfortunately, you've probably confused the APD-250 and the APD-520. The APD-520 is indeed an aviation diesel engine, but it's currently only used on boats.
  7. +6
    22 July 2026 05: 57
    And don't even mention the price. This flying "car" costs nearly 150 million rubles!!! That's the same as 30 of the new, cutting-edge Chinese electric crossovers (and that's after they hit our market). Obviously, the series and all that. But its real price should be 30-40 million.
    1. 0
      22 July 2026 20: 46
      A similar Il-103 costs (was) no more than 20 million rubles. Therefore, with mass production, the price of the Tango is unlikely to be significantly higher.
      1. -1
        24 July 2026 00: 05
        I'd still take the An-2, it costs from 5 million, and they'll overhaul it at any flying club. Then there's the gas. And it can carry a ton and a half, not a couple of suitcases. And those Il and PV-10 Tangos are just toys for millionaires who don't know what to do with their loot.
  8. -1
    22 July 2026 06: 04
    We are waiting in the sky in commercial quantities....... good
  9. +3
    22 July 2026 06: 11
    Quote: faiver
    We are waiting in the sky in commercial quantities.......

    They're promising 20 cars a year, according to the article. Not exactly a marketable quantity, although even that, considering domestic production, is a relief!
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    22 July 2026 08: 16
    Is this a replacement for the AN-2? They plan to produce Baikal for it.
    If it goes into production, it will be a training vehicle.
  13. +3
    22 July 2026 08: 39
    Hurray........!!!!It's already the third decade of the twenty-first century and finally our "miracle state" has created an engine for a light-engine airplane. "We are on the right path, gentlemen...."
  14. +1
    22 July 2026 08: 39
    In terms of size and missions, the Tango is close to the Yak-152.

    What about prices? Price matters these days. According to online reports, the Yak-152 could be three times cheaper than the Tango. If that's true, then what's the point of the Tango?
    1. 0
      22 July 2026 08: 59
      The Yak-152 has a 500 hp engine, while this one has 200 hp. The closest analogues to the S7 aircraft are the Il-103 and the twin-engine Be-103.
      The Tango engine can be installed on a Yak-152 only by connecting two units in series, which would give a total output of up to 400 hp.
      1. +2
        22 July 2026 09: 29
        The Yak-152 is a stillborn project due to its German engine. It's an alternative to the UTS-800 with a VK-800 engine. However, it's even more expensive than the Tango.
        1. +1
          22 July 2026 20: 51
          The idea of ​​coupling two APD-520 engines to double power was announced from the very beginning. So, in theory, this design could be applied to the Yak-152, although the weight distribution might change and airframe adjustments would be necessary.
  15. +2
    22 July 2026 09: 55
    The domestic aviation industry continues work on a promising training aircraft.
    If there is no mass small aviation and it is not expected to be, then this is a mess in a glass of water, IMHO.

    There will be individual victories, but in reality...

    They wrote about it, released some similar one here, 25 pieces, well, the Angloqueen pilot took it for his collection, the sheikh fans bribed him... and that's it...
    1. 0
      22 July 2026 21: 15
      What did you expect? The days of mass small aviation are over. Highways, buses, and cars have appeared, accessible to both citizens and non-citizens. Bridges have appeared where there were none. The small aviation market has shrunk, but it hasn't completely died out.
      1. 0
        23 July 2026 22: 20
        You write unclearly.
        We almost never had such a market.
        And among the Americans, for example, it might have shrunk. But I haven't seen any notes about it.
  16. -1
    22 July 2026 11: 11
    "The domestic aviation industry continues work on the advanced Spectra PV-10 Tango trainer aircraft." And the Russian alphabet and Russian names for equipment have already been banned by law. Why the English letters and the incomprehensible name? "Spectra Tango" translates as "Spectral Tango." I have no idea what this means, as I've never been to a mental hospital and I don't do drugs. The track "Spectra Tango" was released in December 2023 by the Bortus project. The music combines the passion of tango with a mystical, almost otherworldly sound. And how does this relate to a trainer aircraft?
    1. 0
      22 July 2026 12: 57
      Quote: papas-57
      The Russian alphabet and Russian names for equipment have already been banned by law. Why the English letters and the incomprehensible names?

      Once upon a time, when decision-makers were young, anything with Latin (or English) letters or words was considered prestigious. Even if it was written completely inappropriately.
  17. Owl
    -1
    22 July 2026 11: 35
    Everything begins with the first step. It's a shame that the "leaders" were pushed to take this step by the global sanctions imposed on Russia. Are "citizens" ignorant of the history of the USSR being deliberately appointed to leadership positions? Through research, development, and the creation of production, the Soviet Union was able to create an independent industrial and manufacturing base in the 1980s. Some traitors destroyed this after August 1991, while others lined their pockets with kickbacks from massive purchases of imported goods. During the "well-fed" oil and gas years of the 2000s, not a single penny, not a cent, was spent on the revival of science or industry. God willing, Russia's renaissance begins with these small steps.
  18. +2
    22 July 2026 12: 56
    There is nothing unique about it: it is a domestically produced aircraft for the long-established niche of lightweight composite training aircraft with a glass cockpit and an economical piston engine.

    Nevertheless, the An-2 and larger piston-powered trainers are also lacking in uniqueness. And the internal combustion engines (of a more powerful class), which dominate the market and which could and should be copied and produced, are also well-known. But for some reason, no one bothers with this. One attempt was with an internal combustion engine – the RED500, the second with a 4.4L engine from the AURUS. Neither succeeded. And the AURUS, let me remind you, had both a 6,6L and a 2,2L engine in its lineup. Strange.
  19. +1
    22 July 2026 18: 46
    This is the ideal aircraft for private flights. Suitable for businessmen, agricultural holdings, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, and forest protection agencies.

    I've already started dreaming of flying over beautiful terrain in one of these.

    In comparison, the An-2 is a cargo aircraft, designed to accommodate large objects.
  20. +2
    22 July 2026 19: 21
    We have had a lot of things take off and are taking off. fool But it never gets to the series! request lol
    1. +2
      22 July 2026 21: 10
      Society, in this case the aviation community, lives on myths and prejudices.
      First, let's replicate the An-2's solutions, and happiness will follow. It won't, the An-2 was already obsolete when production began. It's a biplane, has a single engine, an air-cooled engine with a short lifespan, and a clumsy landing gear design prone to nose-overs (nose-diving).
      Second, let's install a purely imported engine and things will work out. But if they don't, they won't give us an engine at the most inopportune moment.
      Third, let's replicate the fighters of World War II and win immediately. We won't win; two engines are needed for reliability and success. The lean years are over, and there's no need to skimp on the number of engines.
      The fourth, a turboprop aircraft or turbofan engine, is more modern than a piston engine. It's more modern, but much more expensive to manufacture and operate. Small aircraft cannot be built with turbines; they're too expensive.
      And much more..
  21. 0
    22 July 2026 20: 56
    The plane isn't bad, but in the first photo, where they talk about showing the production, there's this simple electrical tape))) Like in the USSR) and part of the plane with this electrical tape...
  22. 0
    23 July 2026 07: 57
    Quote: ohka
    Unfortunately, you've probably confused the APD-250 and the APD-520. The APD-520 is indeed an aviation diesel engine, but it's currently only used on boats.

    That's right, thanks for correcting me.
  23. 0
    29 July 2026 19: 02
    Nothing will happen. Not the MS-21, not this wretched thing, not... nothing. They'll siphon off the money and head off to the West—along with their families and whores!!!