Battle of Lake Tanganyika

10 615 48
Battle of Lake Tanganyika

Although the battles of World War I were fought primarily in the European and Asian theaters, other corners of the globe were not spared from these turbulent events. One of these was German East Africa—a vast territory three times larger than the metropolis and currently comprising Tanzania, Rwanda, and Burundi.

I think that many readers are not familiar with this episode of the Great War, so I will briefly dwell on it storiesBy the start of military operations in this territory with a population of 7 million, Germany had more than modest armed forces. They consisted of a Schütztruppe of 216 German officers and petty officers and 2540 African soldiers. Most of the soldiers were armed with antediluvian rifles (still using black powder), and artillery consisted of several field guns of the 1873 model. The local police consisted of 45 Germans and 2154 Africans.




General Paul Emil von Lettow-Vorbeck

However, the Schütztruppe had a significant advantage: its commander. Forty-four-year-old Colonel Paul Emil von Lettow-Vorbeck (1870-1964) had 25 years of military experience and embodied the best traits of a true Prussian officer. His service took place in various corners of the globe—Germany, China, and German Southwest Africa. He succeeded in creating well-trained professional units of local residents ("askari") in German East Africa, whose fighters treated their commander with immense respect and loyalty. Their maximum strength reached 11,000 men.

Interestingly, when von Lettow-Vorbeck visited East Africa again in 1953, he was greeted enthusiastically by African veterans of the German army. After the war began, German settlers were mobilized, and they were later joined by 450 sailors from the cruiser Königsberg, sunk in the Rufiji River delta, as well as crew members of the hydrographic survey ship Möwe. Thus, the number of German servicemen reached 3000.


Askari, 1914

Although Colonel (later General) von Lettow-Vorbeck considered this ersatz army "a parody of a military organization," for more than four years it managed to resist the might of the British Empire, which had deployed up to 300,000 British, South African, and Indian soldiers to this theater. The total losses of these troops amounted to approximately 60,000 men. The Germans were forced to fight not only in German East Africa, but also in neighboring British, Belgian, and Portuguese colonies, thousands of kilometers from their supply bases. During this campaign, only two blockade runners were able to deliver a small amount of supplies from Germany. weapons and ammunition, and attempts to supply them via airships were unsuccessful. German troops had to make do primarily with captured supplies, although they were able to establish limited domestic production of some weapons and ammunition. They also managed to dismantle guns from the sunken Königsberg and Möwe and use them on land and on ships in Lake Tanganyika.


The sunken cruiser "Königsberg"


Von Lettow-Vorbeck eludes the British lion. 1918 cartoon.

The Schütztruppe fought its last battle on November 12, 1918, in Rhodesia, and only on November 25 (two weeks after the end of the war in Europe) did it honorably lay down its arms. In March 1919, the only undefeated unit of the German Imperial Army marched ceremoniously through the streets of Berlin.


Von Lettow-Vorbeck's ceremonial welcome in Berlin, 1919

Military operations in East Africa also took place on the vast expanses of Lake Tanganyika, located in the heart of the continent, hundreds of kilometers from the nearest ocean, separating the German colony from the Belgian Congo. The southern shore was part of British Northern Rhodesia. It is the longest freshwater lake in the world (680 km), although its width does not exceed 72 km. At 1430 m, Lake Tanganyika is second only to Lake Baikal in depth, covering an area of ​​32,890 km².


Lake Tanganyika (modern map)

Due to the lake's favorable geographical location and the poorly developed communication network in this region of Africa, Tanganyika was crucial for transporting troops, military equipment, and amphibious operations. It should not be forgotten that the lake adjoined the mining-rich Katanga province of the Belgian Congo, a vital source of supplies for the Entente military machine.


The Lake Tanganyika war zone

However, by the outbreak of World War I, the future enemies had only two steamships in the area: the Belgian Alexandre Delcommune (90 tons) and the German Hedwig von Wissmann (57 tons). The latter was built in 1897 at the Hamburg shipyard of Janssen & Schmilinsky and delivered in disassembled form to the port of Dar es Salaam. Since construction of the railway connecting this city with the port of Kigoma on the coast of Tanganyika (Mittellandbahn) only began in 1904, the delivery of the steamship's parts fell to 5000 African porters. The Hedwig von Wissmann was assembled in Kigoma and entered service in September 1900. The vessel was 36,6 meters long, 6,1 meters wide, and its 60-horsepower steam engine enabled it to reach a speed of 6-7 knots.


Steamship "Alexandre Delcommune"



Steamship "Hedwig von Wissmann"

By mid-August 1914, the German garrison in the Lake Tanganyika region numbered only 176 men, while the Belgian force numbered 1300. Therefore, von Lettow-Vorbeck decided to achieve complete control of the lake by sending additional forces and destroying a Belgian steamship. A group of sailors from the hydrographic survey ship "Möwe," which had been blown up by its crew in Dar es Salaam on August 8, was sent to Kigoma. The unit, designated Marine-Expeditionskorps (later Abteilung "Möwe"), was armed with two 88-mm SKL30 guns (400 rounds of ammunition) and four 37-mm revolver cannons removed from their ship. It was commanded by the commander of the "Möwe", Captain 1st Rank Gustav Zimmer (Kapitän zur See Gustav Zimmer).

On August 12, the first group of approximately 30 sailors from Abteilung Möwe, under the command of Senior Lieutenant Horn (Oberleutnant zur See Horn), arrived in Kigoma and began repairing and arming the steamship Hedwig von Wissmann. It was armed with four (or, according to other sources, three) 37mm guns. Since the 88mm guns were too large for the vessel, an ingenious solution was adopted for their placement. In September, a raft made of three layers of thick wooden beams was constructed, on which both guns were mounted. The raft demonstrated excellent seaworthiness and ease of gun maintenance, but when towed, the steamship's speed dropped to 1,8 knots. Measures were also taken to strengthen the port's coastal defenses to repel a possible Belgian landing.

Already on the night of August 14-15, the Kaiser’s new “combat” ship fleet The ship entered combat. A landing party from it destroyed a telegraph line near Uvira in the Congo, and several small vessels were sunk. However, the Germans' primary objective was to destroy the Alexandre Delcommune. After a lengthy search, the Belgian was spotted near Mpala on August 22 (or 23 or 25, according to other sources), but, taking advantage of its superior speed, it attempted to evade combat and sought the cover of a coastal battery with 75mm and 47mm guns located at the mouth of the Lukuga River—the only outlet of Lake Tanganyika. The British supplied these guns to the Belgians for arming the 1200-ton steamship Baron Dhanis, which had been delivered to the shores of the lake in disassembled form. Since the Hedwig von Wissmann's 37mm guns had a range of only 2400 meters, the Germans were forced to fight within range of the shore batteries. The battle lasted two hours. The Alexandre Delcommune, hit in the boiler and funnel, ran aground. Thanks to skillful maneuvering, the German steamship suffered only minor damage—a hole in her stern ensign.

On August 30, the remaining crew members of the "Möwe" arrived in Kigoma, led by Zimmer, who had been appointed commander of all German forces in the area of ​​Lakes Tanganyika and Kivu. Two steam survey boats from the sunken hydrograph, the motor launch "Peter," belonging to the Gesellschaft für Schlaftkrankheitsbekämpfung (Society for the Fight Against Sleeping Sickness), and the "Benz," belonging to the German East African Railway Company, were also transported to Tanganyika by rail.

The most valuable addition to the lake fleet was the government-owned steamship Kingani, which arrived in mid-October. Built in 1894 by the Meyer shipyard in Papenburg, the vessel served various purposes in the port of Dar es Salaam. The Kingani was 17,1 meters long, 4,6 meters wide, and had a displacement of 20 tons (according to other sources, 45 tons). Its 60-horsepower engine provided a speed of up to 8 knots. The navy had to literally fight to wrest this vessel from the civil administration; a detachment of askaris occupied the vice-governor's residence. On November 10, the steamship entered service, armed with a single 37-mm revolver cannon, taken from the Hedwig von Wissmann.


Steamship Kingani

At the same time, the "Graf von Götzen," a colossus (by Tanganyika standards) with a displacement of 1200 tons, was being assembled in Kigoma. This cargo-passenger steamship was ordered for the East African Railway Company at the suggestion of Kaiser Wilhelm II himself in January 1913. A contract worth 406,000 German marks was signed with the Meyer shipyard in Papenburg. Construction progressed quickly and was completed by the end of November 1913, including testing of the steam engines and boilers.

The Graf von Götzen's main dimensions were 67,1 x 9,1 x 2,3 meters, with a deadweight of 480 tons. A twin-shaft steam engine with a total output of 500 horsepower was designed to provide a speed of up to 10 knots. The vessel was assigned the Germanischer Lloyd classification class 100 A4 Tanganjikasee. Since the vessel was intended to be transported to the coast of Tanganyika in disassembled form, its hull was held together with bolts rather than rivets. After completing its trials, the steamship was dismantled and its parts packed into 5,000 crates, which were delivered to the port of Hamburg by rail. There, the crates were loaded onto four ships bound for the distant shores of East Africa. Construction of two more identical steamships was begun, but the outbreak of war prevented the implementation of this ambitious plan.

Ironically, despite clear signs of war looming, the new vessel was insured by twelve companies from across the British Empire. The policies included a clause insuring against "all consequences of hostile or military action, both before and after the declaration of war."

In Dar es Salaam, the ship's components began their 700-mile journey to Kigoma, first by rail and then the final 20 miles (the road construction was not yet complete) on the backs of several thousand porters, a journey that took three long months. Not without incident: a fire broke out in the railway cars, damaging several components of the new steamship, including the propeller shaft. In Kigoma, under the supervision of three Meyerwerft specialists, assembly of the ship began and was completed on June 1, 1915. The actual cost of the "Graf von Götzen" was 750,000 marks.

At the outbreak of war, the ship was handed over to military authorities. Its crew consisted of 40 men, with the capacity to carry an additional 1000. Initially, its armament consisted of an 88mm gun removed from a raft and two 37mm guns from the Hedwig von Wissmann, which in exchange received a captured British 47mm gun. In August, the Graf von Götzen was rearmed: a 105mm gun from the sunken Königsberg was installed in the bow, an 88mm gun in the stern, and a 37mm revolver gun amidships.



Steamship "Graf von Götzen"


105mm gun of the Graf von Götzen

Meanwhile, military operations in Tanganyika continued as usual. Receiving information that the Belgians had re-floated the damaged Alexandre Delcommune and towed it for repairs, the Germans made another attempt to locate and destroy the enemy vessel. On October 4, 1914, the Hedwig von Wissmann, towed by a gun raft, the motor launch Peter, and two steam launches set out from Kigoma to search for it. Near Baraka, one of the launches came under fire from the Belgians. The Hedwig, arriving just in time, fired thirty 88mm shells at the enemy positions, scoring several hits.

One of the reconnaissance boats spotted the Alexandre Delcommune in Albertville. The decision was made to capture the Belgian steamship and tow it to the German coast or destroy it. On the night of October 8-9, 30 German troops from a steam launch and a boat landed near the suspected location of the enemy vessel. It turned out that the Alexandre Delcommune had been beached for repairs and protected from the waves by an earthen rampart, guarded by a company of Belgian askaris. The Germans managed to board undetected and managed to plant two boxes of dynamite in the engine room and ignite their fuses. They were unable to plant the remaining charges; the troops were discovered and had to fight their way back to their vessels. Thanks to the darkness and confusion among the Belgian askaris, the Germans escaped without losses.

The following night, eight German sailors under the command of First Lieutenant Odebrecht (Oberleutnant zur See Odebrecht) swam ashore, despite the abundance of crocodiles in the local waters, to assess the damage to the Alexandre Delcommune. To their disappointment, only a few hull plates had been torn off. However, the Belgians had become much more vigilant, and the scouts barely managed to escape their pursuers and swim to the Hedwig von Wissmann. Soon, the Germans intercepted a Belgian radiogram about an attack on their positions by a hundred (!) Germans.

On October 19, Zimmer decided to launch a combined attack on Belgian forces near Uvira on the northern shore of the lake. Ground troops advanced along the coast, while the Hedwig von Wissmann, with a gun raft and escorted by two steam launches, bombarded enemy positions, destroying an ammunition depot. The well-fortified positions were unable to be taken, and the ground operation was abandoned.

On October 23, the Hedwig von Wissmann and its raft approached Albertville in an attempt to destroy the Alexandre Delcommune once again, but came under fire from a 76mm coastal battery. The Belgians opened fire from a range of 4 meters, but the Germans responded only after closing to 2300 meters, both to conserve their 88mm shells, which were extremely limited, and to allow for the use of their 47mm guns. The Belgian guns soon fell silent, and fire was transferred to the Alexandre Delcommune, anchored offshore.

At the same time, Zimmer dispatched a steam launch to capture and tow the enemy steamer. This attempt failed: the launch ran aground and came under intense rifle fire from Belgian askaris. However, the Germans managed to patch the holes, float off the sandbar, and escape the shelling. A German engineer was wounded—the first loss for Abteilung Möwe in this campaign. The Belgian steamer was hit 46 times by 88mm shells and was permanently disabled. Thus, the Germans established complete control of the lake, which temporarily prevented the Belgian advance deeper into German East Africa.

In the second half of November, the Hedwig von Wissmann and the Kingani, under the command of Lieutenant Commander Kendrick, conducted a raid on the southern coast of Tanganyika, then part of British Northern Rhodesia. Their mission was to capture or destroy two British steamships located there, which had been rusting on the beach for years without use. The area was virtually deserted due to the threat of sleeping sickness caused by the tsetse fly.

On November 18, the Good News, the first steamship on the lake (built in 1886 and owned by the London Missionary Society), was discovered off Kituna. Due to severe corrosion, the vessel was rendered unusable and was blown up, along with two steel lifeboats nearby. The following day, sailors found the Cecil Rhodes off Kasalakava. The steamship was in good condition, and work began immediately to tow it into clear water. That night, the Germans were attacked by the enemy (one Belgian and one British company with two machine guns), and although the attack was repelled, the Cecil Rhodes had to be blown up. However, the sailors recovered valuable trophies—230 kilometers of telegraph wire and a large number of steel telegraph poles, which were used to lay a telegraph line across German territory.

In late 1914 and early 1915, the Germans conducted a series of raids on the western coast of Tanganyika, disrupting Belgian telegraph lines and land communications and shelling their coastal positions. Fierce clashes erupted repeatedly. Once, the Hedwig von Wissmann was on the brink of destruction: 40 shells from Belgian 76mm guns exploded just a few meters away—so close that the deck awning caught fire.

Meanwhile, Anglo-Belgian military cooperation in this region of East Africa was growing increasingly close, with the goal of defeating von Lettow-Vorbeck's forces. However, the absolute dominance of the German fleet in Tanganyika greatly complicated the successful completion of this task. This attracted the attention of a local hunter of large African game, British citizen John Lee, who conceived a plan to destroy the German vessels. On April 21, 1915, he managed to secure an audience with First Sea Lord Sir Henry Jackson.

D. Lee's somewhat daring plan involved transporting two small, armed motorboats to a remote African lake. The boats' small size allowed them to be transported without disassembly and put into service immediately upon arrival. Their final destination was Lukuga, located a short distance from the German naval base in Kigoma. The proposed route for the boats, covering a total distance of 9310 miles, was as follows:

London to Cape Town (by sea) – 6100 nautical miles
Cape Town - Fungurume in the Belgian Congo (by rail) - 2700
Fungurume - Sankisia (through bush and jungle) - 120
Sankisia - Bukama (by rail) - 15
Bukama - Kabalo (along the river) - 200
Kabalo - Lukuga (by rail) - 175.


Route of the 1915 African Maritime Expedition


The final section of the route

The First Sea Lord approved the plan surprisingly quickly, based on the principle: "It is the duty and tradition of the Royal Navy to engage the enemy wherever there is water to float a ship." The task, dubbed the Naval Africa Expedition, was entrusted to 39-year-old Lieutenant Commander Geoffrey Basil Spicer-Simson, a modest employee of one of the naval intelligence departments. His selection fell not on any outstanding qualities, but simply due to a shortage of officers.


Geoffrey Basil Spicer-Simson

Spicer-Simson was a highly original and colorful figure, likely the oldest active lieutenant commander in the British Navy. He loved to show off his body, completely covered in intricate tattoos, and boast of fantastic exploits and adventures. One day, despite lacking even the most basic technical understanding, he became a cruiser's chief engineer; another, he hunted hippos in Gambia, where they were never found; and he even attempted to teach the Royal Astronomer of Cape Town the basics of... astronomy. One of his "great exploits" was the mythical sinking of a German cruiser off the British coast. Alas, in reality, Spicer-Simson's career was decidedly unsuccessful.

He became a Royal Navy cadet at the age of 14 and continued his service in domestic waters, including Gambia and China, where he conducted the first hydrographic survey of the Yangtze River. However, a series of disastrous mistakes ended his career. In 1905, during maneuvers in the English Channel, he proposed an ingenious idea to search for a submarine by towing a cable between two destroyers, which nearly resulted in the submarine's sinking. During other maneuvers, a ship under Spicer-Simson's command ran aground, resulting in a court-martial. The hapless commander was soon court-martialed again after sinking a pleasure boat. There were casualties.

In August 1914, Spicer-Simson was given command of a flotilla of coastal patrol vessels, consisting of two gunboats and six tugs. He enjoyed his command, observing the vessels entrusted to him from the window of a coastal hotel, where he stayed with his wife and female acquaintances. This carefree life quickly ended: a German submarine torpedoed one of his ships literally under the hotel window, and Spicer-Simson continued his service in a small office in the Admiralty building.

Now fate offered him the opportunity to prove himself in a new field. On top of everything else, the eternal Lieutenant Commander received a promotion to the temporary rank of Commander. John Lee was appointed his deputy, and he and the advance party traveled to Africa to prepare the land route for the boats to Tanganyika.

To be continued ...
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 14
    27 July 2026 05: 05
    Well written, I heard almost nothing about the fighting in Africa during WWI.
    1. -9
      27 July 2026 06: 31
      What's so interesting about that? Minor skirmishes between colonial groups. The fate of the colonies was decided not in Africa, but in Europe.
      1. +4
        28 July 2026 23: 11
        300 – they could have fought in Palestine, Mesopotamia, on the Italian or Western fronts, but they got stuck in Africa. What a success!
        1. 0
          30 July 2026 06: 52
          Quote: Alexander Mitrofanov
          300 could have fought in Palestine, Mesopotamia, on the Italian or Western fronts

          They would rather not have been drafted and would have worked for the needs of the metropolis. But the workforce was put to the test. Which is also a success.
          1. 0
            3 August 2026 22: 28
            These were not labor reserves, but career military personnel of the Empire.
            1. 0
              3 August 2026 22: 54
              You have it written
              the might of the British Empire, which deployed up to 300,000 British, South African and Indian soldiers to this theatre.
              As far as I know, the principle is the same as the Germans—English officers, native soldiers. It's unlikely the British could afford to keep 300 white British personnel in Africa.
              1. 0
                6 August 2026 19: 22
                Only white South Africans served; blacks and coloureds were not called up at that time.
    2. + 12
      27 July 2026 09: 31
      Letov-Forbeck wrote memoirs about the war in Africa, which were published in 1927.
    3. +1
      27 July 2026 17: 27
      "Combat operations in Africa" ​​is a generally little-known episode of WWI.
      Actually, WWI wasn't very well known to us either.
      1. +2
        27 July 2026 17: 52
        "Actually, WWI wasn't very well known here either." You're wrong. Before WWII, a lot of literature on WWI was published in the USSR - memoirs, theoretical works, and historical research.
  2. + 12
    27 July 2026 06: 26
    It was also possible to dismantle the guns from the sunken Königsberg and Möwe and use them on land and on ships on Lake Tanganyika.

    Not only that, but 105mm guns were even mounted on rafts!!! The latter were towed by steamships to enemy positions. The British responded in kind.
    The topic of the application of river (lake) forces is interesting in itself!
    1. +5
      27 July 2026 09: 36
      "The topic of the application of river (lake) forces is interesting in itself!"
      1. +5
        27 July 2026 11: 00
        The development of the river fleet is well described in the encyclopedia of river fleets by I. Chernyakov. The events described in the article are also included in the narrative.
        1. +3
          27 July 2026 14: 59
          There were still military operations taking place on Africa's largest lake, Victoria.
      2. 0
        2 August 2026 07: 44
        Not a bad book—I read it when trying to piece together my grandfather's battle record against the Americans. Although it was the British who were more involved on the Dvina River, advancing from Arkhangelsk toward Kotlas, a key junction and terminus of the railway. The gold reserves were transported from Petrograd to Kotlas, then transported by ferries and rafts to Vologda. For Lenin, this became a key defensive hub, as the British fleet was moving toward it along the Dvina from the north, the Americans were advancing by land, and the White Army was approaching from the south. If they had joined forces, the combined force would have been able to cut off Central Russia from the North, and that would have spelled the end of Petrograd, and then Moscow. But thanks to courage and ingenuity, the British fleet was routed in the winding riverbeds. At the local factory, workers were building makeshift ships, welding guns to barges, and so on. Due to fuel shortages, aircraft were refueling what they could (they only had enough for one sortie), and the militia was supporting the ships from the shore. Commander-in-Chief Pavlin Vinogradov was killed in these battles, and a monument was erected in his honor—the Monument to the Heroes of the Northern Dvina River Flotilla.

        "
        Suddenly, the allies discovered armed opponents on the river, and simply sailing up and taking Kotlas was no longer an option. The River War began, featuring artillery duels between paddle steamers (!), surprise salvoes from floating batteries (field guns on barges) fired from the fog, seaplane raids, the laying of magnetic mines (!) along the river, boardings, grenade attacks on armored ships from the high bank, and land mines buried under rocks piled on the shallows near the fairway. A movie no one has ever made!

        And how poetic the reports of the naval combat operations sounded: "Two hits were recorded. One in the bow gun, the other in the firewood." "Sunken by fire from the steamship Olechka...After a daring sortie, the tugboat Dedushka was captured."
        There were few real naval personnel on the Red Flotilla ships, and even less equipment. Communications were nonexistent.


        On August 7, 1918, at an emergency meeting of the Severodvinsk Provincial Executive Committee, issues related to organizing counteraction to the advancing counterrevolutionary forces were considered. A decision was made to organize a military river flotilla, which was to prevent the interventionists from advancing upriver toward Kotlas. Several steamships were allocated to a detachment under the command of P. Vinogradov. Within two days, they were prepared for military action: armored and armed in the workshops of the Mikhailovsky Backwater. After this, the detachment under the command of P.F. Vinogradov on the steamships "Murman," "Moguchy," "Svetlana," and "Lyubimets" sailed down the Northern Dvina to meet the enemy.

        On the night of August 10-11, 1918, a flotilla of armed and armored ships, under the command of P. Vinogradov, approached Bereznik, occupied by the Dvinsky interventionists, and in a fierce battle that lasted two hours, inflicted a serious defeat on the enemy.
        Approaching Bereznik with the flotilla's lights extinguished, Pavlin Vinogradov began to rout the enemy, opening, as he himself described, "a hurricane-like barrage of fire." The battle lasted two hours and 10 minutes. The enemy suffered heavy losses. In this small engagement, the enemy was repulsed for the first time on the Northern Dvina.
        Having fired their shells, Vinogradov and Co. withdrew, leaving the British to consider the situation and adjust their plans, while the Reds boarded an enemy tugboat along the way.
        The episode entered the history of the Civil War, as Ilyich personally wrote on the report about this battle: "For publication. A major victory over the British and the White Guard scum!"

        The winter of 1918-19 cemented the status quo: the Allies were stuck on the Dvina, and the Reds lacked the capacity for a serious offensive. By the next "season," both sides would strengthen, and the river confrontation would reach a new level of intensity.

        The section of the Northern Dvina from the mouth of the Vaga to the villages of Verkhneye Seltso and Borok, where fierce fighting took place throughout August, changed hands several times. The flotilla headquarters, first in Kotlas and then in Krasnoborsk, worked tensely.

        On September 8, 1918, the Red infantry occupied the village of Shidrovo on the right bank of the Vaga, but a White steamer appeared and began shelling the village.

        From Nikolai Nikitin's story "Northern Aurora":
        “The gun was left without a crew, there was no time to look for a new gunner, and Pavlin himself replaced the wounded one.
        The gun's armor shield partially obscured Pavlin. Standing near the sight and the oblong sighting aperture, Pavlin suddenly sensed a figure behind him. He glanced back. It was Sokolov.
        “Comrade brigade commander, you are being called to the headquarters,” said the orderly.
        "Don't interfere!" Pavlin shouted and fired. The first shell hit the middle of the steamer, near the wheel, almost at the waterline. The shell shattered the deck. "Excellent!" Pavlin said to himself and, without changing his aim, fired again. The second shell hit the stern. A new one rang out.
        A deafening explosion. Fountains of water, steam, and smoke shot up over the river.
        "It's sinking!" someone cried excitedly. "By God, it's sinking!"
        From below, from the coastal path, a sailor came running, out of breath and red from the strain.
        - Comrade brigade commander, this is "Experience"... It's written on the stern!
        "Shells!" Peacock ordered curtly to his loader, a young man of about seventeen. "Get them quick!"
        A nearby gun also hit the Opyt, blowing away part of the superstructure from the stern. The Opyt's aft guns fell silent.
        At this time, another ship appeared near the batteries, and Pavlin put his binoculars to his eyes.
        "An English gunboat!" he shouted, looking around for Saklin. He was standing by one of the guns, pointing the soldiers toward the river.
        Peacock decided to continue firing point-blank. "I'll let them get closer," he thought, putting the binoculars to his eyes again. Suddenly, a flash appeared in the lenses. It sounded like someone had struck a match in the distance, and the flame was immediately blown out by the wind. Almost simultaneously, an explosion sounded somewhere nearby. Peacock turned around and
        fell. As he fell, he managed to think: "What happened? Am I wounded? What about the fight?.."
        An enemy shell struck the logs lying on the shore. Some of them flew into the air, others were splintered. Shrapnel shattered the wheel of the cannon the brigade commander had been firing a minute earlier. Pavlin was struck by one of these fragments.

        In November 1918, the 6th Army already had 10.549 bayonets, 210 machine guns and 70 guns in its ranks.

        Fighting raged almost continuously along the Northern Dvina coast. The enemy's river flotilla, reinforced to seven warships and including a powerful river gunboat, sank two of our three vessels in September: the Moguchy and the Dedushka. The arrival of the powerful M-25 monitor, armed with nine-inch guns, further complicated the situation.

        The Vologda Regiment riflemen and a detachment of sailors, exhausted by continuous fighting, managed to provide some reinforcements: 700 men who had just arrived from Moscow and Leningrad, and one company from Kotlas. By this time, long-range guns had been received from Leningrad, taken from the cruiser Rurik. They were mounted on barges and ships, strengthening the flotilla. And thanks to this, the opportunity to go on the offensive again was gained. On October 4, the villages of Lipovets, Ivanovskoye, and others were recaptured. On October 7, the village of Boretskaya was taken. There, the 2nd "Iron" Battalion, led by Comrade Volkov, captured seven enemy guns and eight machine guns. Then the village of Seletskoye was taken, along with three guns.

        The enemy monitor, fearing being caught by the ice growing from the north, retreated to Arkhangelsk. This gave our flotilla the opportunity to intensify its operations.
        1. 0
          2 August 2026 07: 46
          Fierce fighting began for the village of Tulgas. After the initial battle, which escalated to a bayonet charge, both sides spent two weeks consolidating their positions. Then, Red Army units launched several offensive attacks. The enemy significantly outnumbered us. They had up to 2.500 bayonets, 24 light guns, six six-inch guns, one eight-inch gun, 18 airplanes, and several machine gun nests. We had 1,500 bayonets, 28 machine guns, 10 airplanes, 18 light guns, and two six-inch guns.

          On the railway line, the situation remained "unchanged." Despite the reinforcements of both sides on this front (4.700 bayonets for the Red Army and 3.650 for the allies, with the latter enjoying a significant technical advantage), neither side was able to take the positions head-on. The fortified railway corridor, which could not be bypassed, reduced the struggle to fierce hand-to-hand combat for every kilometer of the railway. The enemy's main positions remained at Obozerskaya Station, and the Red Army's at Plesetskaya Station.

          The situation in the Pechora region became particularly complicated when the enemy captured Perm in the east. The Kai-Cherdyn Front then formed in the north, defended by the Kai-Cherdyn Regiment under the command of Comrade Yurkin. The enemy, advancing from Cherdyn, occupied the village of Porog on the Pechora River and threatened the only route. The Red forces retreated to Ust-Kulom, Pomozdrino, Troitsko-Pechora, and further afield—to Ust-Sysolsk, Yarensk, and Kotlas. White forces, advancing from the north and east, took Yarensk, Ust-Vym, Ust-Sysolsk, and Viziga, encircling Kotlas on both sides. Only thanks to the support of the 3rd Eastern Army was the enemy advance halted. The situation improved significantly after our units were reinforced, and the region was finally cleared by March 1920, after Arkhangelsk was liberated from the Whites.
          On January 7, 1919, the 6th Army received the order: “Push back the enemy operating along the Pinega, Mezen, and Pechora rivers, and resume active operations in the Arkhangelsk direction, with the ultimate goal of occupying Arkhangelsk.”

          The army was faced with extreme difficulties—advancing against an enemy that was more than twice our size (11 thousand against 26 thousand bayonets).

          It was decided to launch an offensive on Shenkursk first. Everything that could be diverted from other directions was withdrawn and thrown toward it.

          The offensive had to be conducted in three directions, in temperatures of -35 to -40 degrees Celsius. Just as ordered, by the night of January 25, our troops approached Shenkursk from three directions, fighting heavily.

          A partisan detachment sent to the rear of Shegovar destroyed enemy telephone communications and set fire to warehouses, thus spreading panic in the enemy's rear. The capture of Shenkursk, however, played a major role and severely impacted the morale of the allied forces. Morale among the enemy troops plummeted, while the Red Army's confidence in the imminent liquidation of the northern front grew.

          In January 1919, battles took place near Shenkursk in the Arkhangelsk region, marking one of the few instances in history where Red Army units engaged in direct armed clashes with US Army units. These events occurred during the Civil War and foreign intervention.

          American troops had been present in the region since the summer of 1918 as part of the Entente forces. The core of the American contingent consisted of units of the 339th US Infantry Regiment, known unofficially as the "Polar Bears," as well as engineer and support units. Formally, they reported to British command. Initially, their mission was described as guarding military depots and supporting anti-Bolshevik forces.

          Shenkursk was important as a hub for winter roads and river communications. In January 1919, units of the Red Army's 6th Army, commanded by Alexander Samoilov, launched an offensive against the positions of the invaders and White forces. The fighting took place in difficult conditions of severe frost and deep snow, with extensive use of sleds and field artillery.

          During the fighting, American units and allied forces abandoned Shenkursk and retreated north. There were losses on both sides, but the exact figures vary among sources. After this operation, American units were no longer involved in active offensive operations and were soon withdrawn from Russia. The United States became the first Entente country to evacuate its troops from the Russian North in 1919.

          The memory of these events lives on beyond Russia's borders. In the US state of Michigan, in Troy, there is a memorial to American soldiers who died during the Northern Intervention. One of their symbols is the polar bear, the nickname of the 339th Infantry Regiment.
    2. +6
      27 July 2026 09: 49
      In the 50s and 60s, the Chinese Communist Party Navy, using its own gunboats and copies of Soviet torpedo boats, repeatedly sank large Kuomintang vessels displacing a thousand tons or more. This is also an interesting topic—if anyone is interested, I can write a few articles about it.
      1. +3
        27 July 2026 12: 37
        "write a few articles" would be good
      2. 0
        27 July 2026 17: 59
        Enough of this fairy tale about China copying everything from the USSR. China received everything primarily from the West, from trophies to military aid against Japan. Actually, China began modernizing from the West back in the 18th and 19th centuries, during the Qing Empire. What 60s are we talking about when, after Khrushchev's rise, relations between China and the USSR soured for a decade and nearly led to war, not to mention the border conflicts in Damansky, the skirmishes in Kazakhstan, and so on.
        1. +2
          27 July 2026 18: 13
          No one doubts that the Chinese produced clones of Mauser pistols and rifles, Colt pistols and Thomson submachine guns.
          There is also no doubt about whether the copying of Soviet weapons and equipment was licensed or not.
          Especially in the aircraft industry.
        2. 0
          27 July 2026 18: 19
          The gunboats were developed by China itself, while the torpedo boats were copied from Soviet ones—why does that offend you? And by the way, your nickname is Takeshi Kitano. Do you really have that much sympathy for Japan?
          1. 0
            3 August 2026 22: 40
            I'm not a participant in the debate, but for some reason some of its participants resort to personal accusations. I've noticed this in relation to my articles as well. I think a decent opponent pays attention to the content of the article, not the author's views. And discusses only the events described in it.
            1. 0
              3 August 2026 23: 03
              I didn't resort to personal attacks. As for that user named "Takeshi Kitano," he suddenly attacked me with insults out of nowhere, and I was left to look for the reason in his profile information, because I wasn't saying "China copied everything from the USSR."
    3. +6
      27 July 2026 12: 53
      Thus, military and other events in confined spaces, especially with minimal supplies and maximum use of local resources, are always interesting.
  3. +4
    27 July 2026 07: 01
    Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
    The topic of the application of river (lake) forces is interesting in itself!

    Chernikov, "Fleet on the Rivers. Encyclopedia of the River Fleet." Polygon, St. Petersburg, 2003.
  4. +6
    27 July 2026 08: 46
    Oh, I remembered! I watched a movie as a kid, "Scream at the Devil," about those colonial wars! But of course, the British were great, and the Germans were still the bad guys.
  5. +8
    27 July 2026 11: 10
    In Africa, at the Battle of Tanga, there was another unfortunate British commander, perhaps more so than Lieutenant Commander Geoffrey Basil Spicer-Simson.

    Major General Arthur Aitken was appointed commander of the British operation to capture the port of Tanga (German East Africa). The operation turned into a series of embarrassing blunders, fatal accidents, and the consequences of incompetent command. The battle culminated in an unexpected enemy – swarms of enraged African bees that attacked the British soldiers, causing them to flee in panic. Fleeing the bees, the British (Indians) fled to the coast where they had landed earlier. This curious battle went down in history as the "Battle of the Bees."

    If I'm not mistaken, the British said that the Germans used biological weapons.
    1. +3
      27 July 2026 12: 34
      "Were the Germans using biological weapons?" Were they deliberately "drilling" bees? 🤣
      1. +5
        27 July 2026 14: 03
        Quote from lisikat2
        "Did the Germans use biological weapons?" Did they deliberately "disease" bees?

        The bees also stung the Germans, who, ignoring the bites, attacked the English-Indians.
        1. -1
          27 July 2026 17: 49
          "They stung the Germans too," but they forgot to blame the "sepoys" for this.
          In that case, this is just your statement🤣
          1. +1
            28 July 2026 01: 44
            Quote from lisikat2
            In that case, this is just your statement.

            Von Lettow Vorbeck left a memoir about the war in East Africa, in which he wrote, among other things, that bees stung the Germans severely. Read his memoirs carefully if you don't believe me.
            1. -2
              28 July 2026 16: 34
              "You don't believe me" Where can I find these memoirs?
              1. 0
                6 August 2026 19: 28
                Everything is available online. While writing this article, I actually bought paper copies in English through Amazon, but you can find electronic versions too.
  6. +3
    27 July 2026 12: 30
    Dear author, thank you very much for this material. I had no idea about the fighting in Africa during WWI.
    To be honest, I know little more than zero about the military operations in WWI on the European continent.
  7. +2
    27 July 2026 14: 17
    Quote: Sergey Valov
    Letov-Forbeck wrote memoirs about the war in Africa, which were published in 1927.


    Dear Sergey! Thanks for the tip. I've downloaded it and will read it.

    https://royallib.com/book/fon_lettovforbek_paul/moi_vospominaniya_o_vostochnoy_afrike.html
    1. +1
      28 July 2026 23: 18
      All sources, including the memoirs of Lettow-Forbeck, can be found in the second part - "Sources"
  8. 0
    27 July 2026 14: 34
    Quote from lisikat2
    Dear author, thank you very much for this material. I had no idea about the fighting in Africa during WWI.
    To be honest, I know little more than zero about the military operations in WWI on the European continent.

    Try this.
    https://vtome.ru/knigi/military_history/472824-polnaja-jenciklopedija-pervaja-mirovaja-vojna-19141918.html
    1. +1
      3 August 2026 22: 56
      As Comrade Lenin said, it was a purely imperialist war for the redivision of the world. The main aggressors were the Entente countries. Russia suddenly and urgently needed the Turkish Straits, Galicia, and Turkish Armenia. Of course, poor Gavrilo in Sarajevo was a pretext, as was the defense of his native Serbia. To seize German colonies—England, etc.—both. The Germans and the Austro-Hungarians wanted something, but it was unclear what.
  9. +3
    27 July 2026 14: 54
    Very interestingly written, A+ to the author! The topic is completely new to me. Incidentally, before World War I, Germany possessed impressive colonial territories in Africa (Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi—which is discussed here—Namibia, Togo, Cameroon), in China (Qingdao), Micronesia (Nauru, the Caroline, Marshall, and Mariana Islands), part of Papua New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands.
  10. +2
    27 July 2026 16: 15
    In 1905, during maneuvers in the English Channel, he proposed the original idea of ​​searching for a submarine by towing a cable stretched between two destroyers, which almost led to the destruction of the submarine.

    It turns out that the remedy turned out to be effective. feel
  11. 0
    27 July 2026 17: 19
    "a raft was built" as they say: "necessity is the mother of invention"
  12. +1
    27 July 2026 17: 42
    "where they have never been found" Minhausen, "of British origin"
    I remember Munchausen, too, was somewhere. Although, no, Baron, he didn't look at the hippos.
  13. +1
    27 July 2026 19: 53
    Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
    The development of the river fleet is well described in the encyclopedia of river fleets by I. Chernyakov. The events described in the article are also included in the narrative.

    Chernikov, to be precise.
    https://libcats.org/book/634901?ysclid=ms3gx3upb8386571362
  14. +1
    27 July 2026 22: 28
    Thanks to the author for an engaging account of rarely covered events on the African continent! There's an old TV series, "The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones," that features episodes about World War I in Africa.
  15. 0
    27 July 2026 23: 45
    Interesting presentation. I look forward to the continuation.
  16. 0
    28 July 2026 02: 58
    Excellently presented, interesting, colorful, thanks to the author!
  17. 0
    28 July 2026 07: 51
    Excellent material! I've read about the Tanganyika skirmishes before, but it was very brief and lacked such detail. Thanks!
    One day, the Hedwig von Wissmann found itself on the brink of destruction - 40 shells from 76-mm Belgian guns exploded just a couple of meters away from it.

    I didn't quite understand that part. It wasn't a 40-gun salvo, after all.
    1. 0
      6 August 2026 19: 30
      But couldn't they fire single shots? It wasn't fired from a 406mm gun; the small caliber reloads quickly.