Who are the Pechenegs and where did they “disappear”?

11 742 28
Who are the Pechenegs and where did they “disappear”?
The defeat of the Pechenegs near Kyiv in 1036. Miniature from the Radziwill Chronicle


General situation


After the battle of Listven near Chernigov in the autumn of 1024, where the army of Prince Mstislav Vladimirovich, an experienced commander and hero, defeated the regiments of Yaroslav Vladimirovich, the brothers divided Rus'.



Mstislav decided not to continue the civil strife and proposed peace: "Sit on your throne in Kiev, for you are the elder brother, and be on my side." The left bank of the Dnieper, along with the Chernigov lands, remained with Mstislav, while the right bank remained with Yaroslav. Yaroslav, who was known for his great caution, preferred to rule from his loyal Novgorod, where he could receive aid from his allied Varangians.

The brothers no longer quarreled, and Rus' flourished. In 1029, the combined forces of Yaroslav and Mstislav recaptured Tmutarakan. In 1030, Yaroslav's forces easily routed the Ests (the ancestors of the Estonians), who still lived in a tribal system and lacked a common ruler or state. To consolidate his rule in the Baltics, the Grand Duke founded the fortress of Yuryev (Yaroslav's baptismal name, now Tartu).

The Russian prince left local customs untouched, merely stationing his governors and garrisons in the towns to collect tribute. Yaroslav did not forcibly convert the local Finno-Ugric tribes to Christianity, as this could have resulted in a protracted and bloody war in the forests.

Paganism still predominated in Rus' itself; Christianity had barely established itself in the major cities, and then only in the form of dual faith. When Mother Lada became the Mother of God, Rod became God the Father Almighty, Svetly Khors became Christ the Son of God, Perun became St. George the Victorious or the Prophet Elijah, and so on.

The exiled brothers of the Polish King Mieszko Bolesławicz, Bezprym and Otto, took refuge at Yaroslav's court. The Norwegian princes Olaf (his daughter Ingigerda was Yaroslav's wife; Olaf soon died in the struggle for the Norwegian throne) and Harald Hardrada also arrived in Novgorod one after another.

The time soon came to resolve the Polish question. Poland was torn apart by squabbles between feudal lords, Christians, and pagans. The Lusatian and Lutici tribes, subdued by Bolesław the Brave, rebelled. They called on the German Emperor Conrad for help. Among the enemies of the Polish King Mieszko were Russians, Germans, and Czechs.

Yaroslav and Mstislav launched a joint attack on Poland from the east, while the Germans and Czechs attacked from the west. Poland, engulfed in turmoil, was unable to offer serious resistance. Russian troops captured Belz in Galicia. The western part of Galicia-Volhynia was returned to the unified Russian state.

Yaroslav and Mstislav launched an offensive and easily recaptured the Cherven cities of Przemysl and Cherven (Cherven Rus'). Let me remind you that There was no "Ukraine," no "Ukrainian cities," no "Ukrainian princes," no "Ukrainians." The Ukrainian state and ethnic chimera was created only in the 20th century. There was Rus', the Russian land, Russian cities, Russian princes, Russians—Rus'—Rusichi—Rus'.

Yaroslav founded the city of Yaroslavl, now the Polish city of Jarosław in the Subcarpathian Voivodeship. Russian troops entered Poland itself, easily defeating local forces of feuding feudal lords. Mieszko fled to Bohemia, and Yaroslav's forces occupied its capital, Gniezno. Bezprym was placed on the throne. Germany received Lusatia, and Bohemia received Silesia and Moravia.

As a result, Rus' recaptured Cherven Rus' and restored its western border. Russian regiments seized vast amounts of booty and trophies. They took revenge for the capture and sack of Kyiv by Bolesław's Western Poles in 1018. Yaroslav resettled numerous Polish captives along the Ros River, strengthening the defensive line at the border between forest and steppe, on the right bank of the Dnieper (the Poros defensive line). The cities of Korsun (now known as Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi), Boguslav, and Yuryev (now Bila Tserkva) were founded.

I remind that The Western Poles were at that time brothers of the Eastern Poles, speaking the same language, worshiping the same gods, and sharing a single spiritual and material culture. Later, the schism occurred between Catholicism (with the full support of the Vatican) and Orthodoxy. But even during the time of Bohdan Khmelnytsky, the language was unified. (Russians and Poles understood each other without translators), it's clear that there were numerous dialects. Ancient traditions and customs were shared.

The crisis in Poland continued. Bezprym ruled for only a year and was assassinated. After his death, the kingdom was divided between Mieszko, Otto, and their cousin Dietrich (Piast). The country was engulfed in mass popular uprisings, which escalated into a veritable peasant war. Pagans crushed the secular and clerical feudal lords who robbed the people and imposed Christianity with fire and sword, and Poland temporarily reverted to paganism. Order was restored only with the aid of the troops of the German Emperor and Yaroslav.

Rus' retained its influence over its neighbor. Russo-Polish relations during this period were good. Yaroslav's sister, Maria (Dobronega), became the wife of the Polish King Casimir (1039–1058).


The joint campaign of Yaroslav the Wise and Mstislav Vladimirovich against Poland, capturing cities and capturing prisoners. 1031. Miniature from the Radziwill Chronicle.

Siege of Kyiv


In 1036, Prince Mstislav died unexpectedly while hunting, and Yaroslav became the sole ruler of all Rus'. Mstislav's only son died before his father, and the Tmutarakan Principality and the Left Bank of the Dnieper passed into the Grand Prince's control.

That same year, Yaroslav's men captured his younger brother, Sudislav, who ruled in Pskov and was suspected of treason. The Pskov Principality was liquidated and subordinated to Novgorod, becoming its "suburb" (subordinate city). Sudislav spent 23 years in prison, outliving Yaroslav the Wise and becoming the last surviving son of Vladimir the Saint. He took monastic vows, becoming the first Rurikovich to do so.

The mighty Mstislav, undefeated, was a terror to the steppe and highlanders. Yaroslav could wage war in the north and west while his brother remained in the south. He was feared, and the Pechenegs subsided. After his death, the nomads suddenly rallied and marched on Kyiv. They breached the border defenses, wasting no time besieging fortified towns; they simply outflanked them.

The capital, where boyars' troops had flocked and peasants had fled, had managed to prepare for defense. The commanders armed their men. The first assaults were repelled, and the siege began.

Yaroslav was in the north at the time, installing his son Vladimir on the Novgorod throne. He was settling Pskov affairs and electing the Novgorod bishop, who became the Russian Luka Zhidyata. The Russian North immediately armed itself, fielding regiments and armies.

Yaroslav returned to the south with a large force. He deployed his army following the example of his brother Mstislav, with three regiments along the front: the Russian Varangians (Rus' of the North; The Lie of the Norman Theory) stood in the center, with the Novgorodians and Kievans on the flanks. The two armies met at the site where Hagia Sophia now stands. "And the battle was fierce, and barely by evening Yaroslav prevailed." The Pechenegs suffered enormous losses and fled. Many steppe dwellers drowned in the Svetitsa and other rivers and streams while pursued by the Grand Duke's troops.

After this crushing defeat, the Pechenegs yielded their position to the Polovtsians. They were partially driven into Byzantine lands and resettled in Hungary.

Yaroslav founded a new large fortress city and Saint Sophia:

"Yaroslav founded the great city of Kyiv, which has the Golden Gates; he also founded the Church of Saint Sophia..."


Yaroslav expands Kyiv. Miniature from the Radziwill Chronicle of the 15th century.

"Disappeared" Pechenegs


A "cut" version of Russian stories, which was introduced to us by German historians (information saboteurs) and their Russian followers like Karamzin, gives all the Eurasian steppes to the Turks, to whom it refers the Khazars, Pechenegs and Polovtsians (Rus' and the Polovtsian Steppe).

Allegedly, after the Khazars, who also "disappeared" to an unknown destination, the entire southern part of the Eastern European Plain was occupied by the Pechenegs, who became known as the "most bitter enemies" of Rus'. However, it was the Pecheneg cavalry that allied with the Russian prince Igor the Old, who was attempting to capture Constantinople at the point of a spear. The Pecheneg light army allied with Svyatoslav Igorevich, helping him crush Khazaria and Bulgaria and fight the Byzantine Romans. At this time, the Pechenegs served as the "regular cavalry" of the Russian princes, covering the flanks of their armies.Pechenegs. Ship Rus and their strength).


Svyatoslav invades Bulgaria with his Pecheneg allies. A miniature from the Manasseh Chronicle, a Bulgarian medieval written work, a translation of the World Chronicle by the Byzantine writer Constantine Manasseh.

The Pechenegs subsequently actively collaborated with the Russian princes. In particular, they fought on the side of Svyatopolk Vladimirovich (called the Accursed by his enemies) against his brother Yaroslav, nicknamed the Wise.

It is known that the Pechenegs were anthropologically Caucasian (white), like the Rus' (Russians). They arrived in the Russian steppes from the east, where they lived between the Volga and the Aral Sea. They then crossed the Volga, displacing the Ugrians from the Don-Dnieper interfluve, and occupied the northern Black Sea region as far as the Danube.

Like a number of other peoples of the southern Russian steppes, the Pechenegs left their mark primarily in historiography and historical works. Archaeologically, there are no traces of the Pechenegs as a distinct, separate ethnic group in the steppes of southern Russia. For example, historian S. Pletneva ("The Polovtsians") noted that not a single Pecheneg settlement or burial ground is known in the southern Russian steppes.

This was explained by the fact that the Pechenegs were nomads who were constantly on the move and left no traces of permanent settlements. Or at least none had yet been found. They claimed they practiced the most archaic, camp-based type of nomadism, where the tribe migrated year-round, summer and winter.

This is obviously foolish—in the Russian steppes, in winter, in temperatures of -20-30 degrees Celsius, with strong winds, blizzards, and snow?! Clearly, the natural and climatic conditions preclude permanent migration. At least seasonal, "winter" camps are necessary. There must also be burial grounds.

This shows, as historian N. I. Vasilyeva notes in her work "Russian Scythia," that "those whom Russian chronicles call 'Pechenegs' were not at all some kind of 'external' peoples to Rus'. They were, in essence, the same southern Russian Yass-Alans, which is why their traces are indistinguishable against the backdrop of ordinary Alan antiquities."

The Pecheneg period in the history of the southern Russian steppes (10th–11th centuries) reveals complete material and spiritual continuity with the Alan-Sarmatian tradition (and further along the Scythian-Cimmerian-Aryan-Hyperborean line): anthropology, burial mounds, the cult of the mounted warrior, material culture—horses or their effigies, inlaid silver belts, heavy bows, straight-bladed sabers, belt pendants, and monuments honoring warriors. The Pechenegs, like their ancestors, led a "Cossack way of life"—one day a peaceful herder, the next—mounted and into battle.

Let's recall that the Pecheneg prince Kurya, who ambushed Svyatoslav at the Dnieper rapids (possibly at the behest of some of the Kyivan elite, the boyars, who did not want the Grand Prince to return), made a cup from Svyatoslav's skull. This custom of making cups from the skull bones of slain enemies is an ancient tradition of the Scythian and Aryan Rus'. It was later adopted by the Turkic tribes, as was the cult of the wolf.

The Pechenegs buried their dead in the same burial mounds where the Sarmatians and Scythians had been buried, meaning they remembered who their ancestors were. Just as today's Russians bury their dead next to their deceased relatives, in the same cemeteries.

Another piece of evidence that the Pechenegs were among the heirs of Great Scythia is their runic writing system, which dates back to the ancient tradition of the civilization of Northern Eurasia.

Some Pecheneg clans did indeed come from the east. But they were part of a once vast civilization—Greater Scythia, which stretched from the Danube to the Pacific Ocean, from the Arctic Ocean to India. Therefore, the Pechenegs easily integrated into the local political environment. Their princes-khans were sometimes friends with, sometimes at war with, the Russian princes, who slaughtered their brothers as the most vicious of enemies.

Thus, the long-held idea that Rus' waged a stubborn struggle against the Pecheneg hordes does not correspond to reality. On the contrary, the Pechenegs helped Rus' crush an old and dangerous enemy, Khazaria. Together with the Pechenegs, the Russians established control over the Black Sea steppe, including Tmutarakan. Russian troops fought alongside the Pechenegs against Byzantium.

For almost the entire 10th century, relations were allied, and became strained during the "Christian" period, when the Pechenegs supported the enemies of Vladimir the Baptist and Yaroslav Vladimirovich, the same Russian princes. The Pecheneg clans also refused to submit to the grand ducal authority, and were therefore defeated. Their remnants were assimilated, becoming part of the vast super-ethnos of the Rus'.


"The Death of Prince Svyatoslav." 19th-century drawing by B. A. Chorikov. The tradition lives on – the Pechenegs are depicted as Scythian warriors.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 13
    20 July 2026 07: 42
    Well, there was no national consciousness back then; there were various lords who decided their own affairs, without any regard for the opinions of their serfs and peasants, who had no nationality in principle. Nationalism was invented much later and for entirely different purposes.
    1. +3
      20 July 2026 08: 22
      Quote: Civil
      Well, there was no national consciousness back then.
      Not quite so. The earliest forms of human social organization were based on kinship and the survival instinct, where shared hunting and territorial defense became the foundation for the emergence of collective self-awareness. Can you imagine a member of another clan approaching a fire where a mammoth was roasting and cutting off a small piece? Over time, these primitive bonds within a single clan evolved into complex tribal structures, where shared interests and intra-clan solidarity became the fundamental principles of survival. This is where the unity of interests and cohesion of members of the clan comes from, what is now called nationalism...
      1. +1
        20 July 2026 12: 49
        Quote: Luminman
        The primary forms of human social organization were based on kinship and the instinct for survival, where joint hunting and the protection of one's territory became the foundation for the emergence of collective self-awareness.

        The article discusses the 11th century AD and territories where early feudal systems had already been established. A serf/serf was considered personal property, like a horse. Lords held their lands by right of might, and there was no sense of community based on nationality.
        This is where the unity of interests and cohesion of members of the clan comes from, what is now called nationalism...

        everything was mixed in one basin) From here comes the unity of interests and cohesion of the members of the family - this is apparently about the monarchy, but even there unity was rarely discussed.
    2. +1
      20 July 2026 08: 54
      Quote: Civil
      Well, there was no national consciousness back then.

      That's true, but there was a concept of "friend or foe"... they developed, decorated, expanded their lands/estates/cities, often at the expense of "half-friend" neighbors, and at the expense of "foes" - it was simply a sacred thing... etymology shows this state of affairs well - a foreigner-etranger (from etrange - strange) in French, a German-mute in Russian

      P.S. Even in the last century, you could, coming from the southern/central regions, live in Brittany for 50 years, but the whole village considered you an outsider, even though you seemed to be of the same "nationality"... so it's not all that simple, like "they just came up with it" :)
      1. 0
        20 July 2026 12: 53
        Quote: Rodez
        P.S. Even in the last century, you could, coming from the southern/central regions, live in Brittany for 50 years, but the whole village considered you an outsider, even though you seemed to be of the same "nationality"... so it's not all that simple, like "they just came up with it" :)


        Stranger versus friend was a matter of security in the 11th century, but considering a new master who had seized land and serfs a stranger could cost one's life. Everything is relative.
        1. +1
          20 July 2026 14: 07
          Quote: Civil
          consider the new master who seized the land and slaves a stranger

          The captured land and the slaves became the master and his people's own :)
          until their neighbor seizes them... I meant that if in the modern sense national self-identification (not external) really appeared later, then the socio-territorial-social one has already gone far beyond the boundaries of the clan-tribe and the surrounding plain or forest
    3. -2
      20 July 2026 12: 01
      Quote: Civil
      Well, there was no national consciousness back then.


      Controversial statement:
      1. The language was practically common.
      2. Princes were invited to rule from practically all these lands, shuffling them like cards in a deck. Is this possible without a lack of national identity? It's unlikely they were suicidal and willing to invite foreigners, essentially enemies, to rule. The hereditary line was strictly controlled. Imposters were impaled with ease and casualness, and for such a crime, this was not the harshest punishment.
      3. Novgorodian troops, along with Norwegian ones, for some reason ventured into the eastern steppes beyond Astrakhan. Clearly, they weren't just there to stroll, much less plunder. They had their own interests there, and it's unlikely they would have been able to simply force warriors into those lands. All of this really happened, but it's necessary to arrange all these events in a coherent manner, without forgetting or omitting anything.
      4. Prince Vladimir was clearly baptized in Chersonesos (Korsun) not because the Russians considered it a Greek city. Did they really have nothing better to do than run around plundering and losing men in battle? They were like pirates or bandits, if you read our historians. In fact, the squads were relatively small and didn't send people to their deaths without cause. For this, it wouldn't take long to get a knife in the back, and those who did this, or acted thoughtlessly, did.
      1. +4
        20 July 2026 12: 58
        1. The language was practically common.

        No, it wasn't. That was still early in the 11th century.
        2. Princes were invited to reign from almost all of these lands, shuffling them like cards in a deck.

        Did the serfs and their serfs invite princes for themselves? Have you heard of the law of the strong?
        3. Precisely, the gentlemen and their squads were equal to themselves and in their interests, no more stupid than today's oligarchs.
        4.
        Prince Vladimir was clearly baptized in Chersonesos (Korsun) not because the Russians considered it a Greek city. Did they really have nothing better to do than run around plundering and losing men in battle?
        Because there was smog and good loot there, there were no "Greek," "Russian," or other cities. Whoever ruled the city ruled the city.
  2. +1
    20 July 2026 08: 13
    And who multiplied our Prince Svyatoslav Igorevich by zero? Wasn't it the Pechenegs, by any chance?
    Yeah, good allies. The Pechenegs gained strength after Svyatoslav subdued Khazaria, seizing the opportunity. And the Pechenegs blocked the trade route from Central Asia for the Russians. This was one of the reasons why Svyatoslav even considered moving his capital, deciding to go to Bulgaria, closer to the Danube (the true route from the Varangians to the Greeks). The Pechenegs became Byzantium's proxy, a means of restraining the growth of Rus'.

    And who are these "Pechenegs"? They are, in fact, the ancestors of today's Hungarians, a fragment of the Hunnic empire, one might say. After all, the Hungarians consider themselves descendants of the Huns, and named their country after them—Hungary (Hun).
    And the word, the root "pech" (pest) is still found in the name of the Hungarian capital - Budapest-pest.
    1. +5
      20 July 2026 09: 17
      Quote: Illanatol
      And who are these "Pechenegs"?

      Turks. Nomads.
      1. -2
        20 July 2026 13: 00
        The Pechenegs, the ancestors of today's Hungarians, belong to the Finno-Ugric peoples. "Ugrians" is the ancient name (self-designation) of the Hungarians. "Ogres"—mythical evil, man-eating giants—are derived from "Ugrians." The Russian word for "furnace" is believed to have originated from the name of the Hungarian city of Pest (now part of Budapest). Pest was a major (for its time) center of metallurgy. These "nomads" were skilled in metalworking and weapon making. The Pecheneg Hungarians were the first in Europe to master the production of sabres—an advanced type of bladed weapon. Sabres were initially called "batorki" (bathors) in honor of King Stefan Batory, who began to widely adopt these weapons in his army.
        1. 0
          22 July 2026 18: 19
          Quote: Illanatol
          It is believed that the Russian word "oven" comes from the name of the Hungarian city of Pest (now part of Budapest).

          Folk etymology. In fact, the word "oven" existed in Indo-European languages ​​long before the city of Pest appeared on the map.

          The word "pech" (furnace) is of Common Slavic origin. It goes back to the Proto-Slavic word "pekt'" (pekt'). The same root gives rise to words in other Slavic languages: Old Russian "pech'" (pech), Old Church Slavonic "pesht'" (κάμινος, σπήλαιον), Ukrainian "pіch", Belarusian "pech", Bulgarian "peshch", Serbo-Croatian "pȇħ", Slovenian "rȇč", Czech and Slovak "res", and Polish "rіes".
          The original meaning of the noun is reconstructed as "a place where they bake or fry." The word is formed by suffixation from the verb stem "pek-" (pek-) with the suffix -ть (-to). As the language developed, the difficult-to-pronounce consonant combination "kt" (kt) was transformed into the sound "ч" (ch).
          The verb "to bake" is of Indo-European origin and is found in many languages. It is related to the ancient words:
          in ancient Indian language - paktíṣ ("cooking, boiled food");
          in Greek - πέψις ("boiling, frying").
    2. +1
      21 July 2026 17: 51
      And who are these "Pechenegs"? They are, in fact, the ancestors of today's Hungarians, a fragment of the Hunnic empire, one might say. After all, the Hungarians consider themselves descendants of the Huns, and named their country after them—Hungary (Hun).

      Ostap was carrying! laughing
      The Pechenegs are not the ancestors of today's Hungarians. Nor are they a remnant of the Hunnic empire. Hungarians can consider themselves whatever they want. "Hungary" doesn't come from the Huns, but from the Oghurs, whose name can be recognized in the word "Ugric." The Oghur tribes were the first Turkic people to migrate westward in several waves. First, along with the Huns in the 4th century, and then in the 5th and 6th centuries, influenced by the tribal movements in Asia. So, these Oghurs in the Southern Urals partially interbred with the local Ugric-Magyars, and from there they set off westward as a Ugric tribe, not a Turkic one, along the way absorbing a smattering of Turks like the Kabars (Khazars) and the like. Along the way, they displaced the Bulgars from the so-called "Ugric-Magyar" region. The Lebedii, somewhere in the Don and Azov steppes, then, under pressure from the Pechenegs, retreated further into the so-called Atelkuza, located somewhere in the Dniester-Dnieper interfluve. There, the Pechenegs, taking advantage of the Ugrians' military campaign, invaded Atelkuza in 895 and allegedly slaughtered all the women, children, and elderly. The Ugrians were forced to retreat even further west, eventually arriving in Pannonia, where the Slavic state of Great Moravia already existed, replaced in the 10th century by the Kingdom of Hungary.
      Modern genetic studies of Hungarians show that the eastern contribution (similar to Ugric peoples such as the Khanty) to the Hungarian gene pool accounts for only about 3-4%; the rest is primarily local Slavic genetics. However, in Hungary, the hypothesis of "Avar-Hungarian continuity" has recently been circulated. According to this hypothesis, the Turkic Magyars allegedly arrived in Pannonia, where Avars lived in large numbers, and who assimilated these Magyars, passing on their Ugric language. This hypothesis fails to explain why, despite such a large population, the Avars lost their statehood, the origin of their Ugric language, despite their descent from the Rouran, and the disappearance of the Slavs.
  3. +4
    20 July 2026 08: 25
    Quote: Illanatol
    The Pechenegs became a proxy of Byzantium, a means of restraining the growth of Rus'.
    For Byzantium, they were just barbarians who had to be contained, along with the Germans, Slavs, Vikings, Turks of all stripes and ranks, and many, many others...
    1. -3
      20 July 2026 13: 06
      For the European Union, Ukrainians were just barbarians who... well, you get the idea.
      While Byzantium was strong and wealthy, it often didn't restrain the barbarians, but bribed them and set them against each other. Thus, Byzantium collaborated with the Khazars until they became too strong and independent. When this issue needed to be resolved, the basileus financed Svyatoslav's campaign against the Khazars, throwing in a few centenarii of gold. Later, Byzantium tried to use Svyatoslav against the neighboring Bulgarians. When Svyatoslav became a problem for Byzantium itself, the Pechenegs were brought in. Since John Tzimiskes himself couldn't completely resolve the problem with the Russians...
  4. +9
    20 July 2026 09: 17
    Hmm, "Great Scythia from the Danube to the Pacific Ocean" is something new, Samsonov is on fire, so soon the Chinese will turn out to be descendants of the ancient Rus-Aryans, another alternative theory
    1. +1
      20 July 2026 09: 28
      I think Tamerlane will also turn out to be Russian, Gerasimov lied again.

      laughing
  5. +8
    20 July 2026 10: 21
    Well, you, author, have really exaggerated))) And are you unaware of other facts? The Pechenegs began to ally with Rus' after Prince Igor's campaign in 920 "... fought against the Pechenegs" (PSRL. - 1871. - Vol. 2. - P. 26.) And only after 944 Igor "... commanded the Pechenegs to wage war on the Bulgarian land" (PSRL. - 1871. - Vol. 2. - P. 28). And already in 968 (6476), during Svyatoslav's campaign in the Bulgarian Kingdom, the Pechenegs suddenly besieged Kyiv. And after Svyatoslav gave the Pechenegs a good beating, in 970 (6478) the Pechenegs became allies of Rus' in the Battle of Arcadiopolis, forming one of the flanks of the Russian army. And already in 972 (6480), at the Dnieper rapids, they attacked Svyatoslav's army and completely destroyed it. Then Yaropolk, Svyatoslav's eldest son, assumed the throne; he was 11 years old, and Pecheneg raids again intensified. But in 978 (6486), Yaropolk inflicted a major defeat on the Pechenegs and even imposed tribute on them. "Yaropolk defeated the Pechenegs and imposed tribute on them" (PSRL. - 2000. - Vol. 9. - P. 39), etc. So there's no need to paint the story that the Pechenegs were allies and that Rus' didn't suffer or defend itself from constant raids.
  6. +5
    20 July 2026 12: 38
    Well I do not know...
    In modern mythology, it is believed that because of the Pechenegs, we cannot produce normal, inexpensive cars or even target inflation.
    I even think that among us there are still many hidden Pechenegs who specifically run for parliament, the financial and economic bloc, judges, deputy ministers of defense and housing and communal services, in order to, therefore, deceive them.
    And some are no longer riding horses, but electric scooters, and are killing old ladies on the sidewalks.
    These Pechenegs are very cunning and wily, and it is difficult to recognize them; through centuries of interbreeding, they have become indistinguishable from us. Some even join the police to erect a golden toilet (a sacred symbol of idolaters?) or store cubic meters of money in their apartments, which is consistent with the culture of nomadic burial mounds.
    As for the article, I would draw attention to the figure of Mstislav, a rare case of such a successful and talented statesman, who is neither greedy nor vain: having defeated his brother Yaroslav, he did not humiliate or destroy him, giving him a chance for a great destiny and the nickname the Wise.
    So, think about which of them is the Wise. Mstislav, in that case, is simply the Great, which, however, hasn't happened in historiography.
    1. 0
      22 July 2026 07: 57
      It's nice to read such flattering words about my ancestor Mstislav the Bold.
  7. +2
    20 July 2026 13: 05
    Where did the Pechenegs go, or "the people who disappeared in one day"?
    In the mid-11th century, the Pechenegs moved to the border of the Byzantine Empire and began to raid.
    In 1090, the Pechenegs nearly reached Constantinople. Finding themselves in a dire situation, Alexius Komnenos turned to the Polovtsians for military support. Khans Bonyak and Tugorkan were received at the emperor's court with great honor, received rich gifts, and promised to provide the Byzantines with their assistance.
    The emperor also sent several letters to the rulers of Western Europe, asking fellow Christians to aid him in the fight against the pagan nomads. As a result, a "mercenary army from Rome" arrived in Constantinople.
    The decisive battle took place near the city of Enos, at the foot of Levunion Hill (Levuni). On April 29, 1091, "...the two armies clashed in hand-to-hand combat, and a massacre began, the likes of which no one had ever witnessed." The combined Byzantine-Polovtsian forces defeated the Pechenegs in a brutal clash.
    Having routed the enemy, the imperial army turned its attention to the supply trains carrying women, children, and the elderly, who usually traveled in the rearguard of the Pecheneg army. All of them were slaughtered, as were the soldiers captured by the Byzantines during the battle.
    “Something extraordinary happened that day: an entire people perished, along with women and children, a people whose numbers did not amount to ten thousand people, but were expressed in enormous numbers,” wrote the emperor’s daughter Anna Comnena in her historical chronicle, The Alexiad.

    Having suffered a crushing defeat, the Pechenegs dispersed across various countries. They migrated in small groups wherever their paths led them and gradually assimilated with other peoples, losing their national identity by the 14th century.
  8. +3
    20 July 2026 13: 33
    During his time as an author on VO, Mr. Samsonov could have already written and defended a real historical work, or at least a literary one, since he's so fond of fables. But no, his fantasy opuses continue to flow like a foaming torrent... Nationality emerged in the 19th century; any historian knows that, and if Mr. Samsonov doesn't know that, then he's not a historian. And if he's not a historian, then why the hell is he still making fun of the early Middle Ages? Like, it was a long time ago, won't anyone scold him for it?
    "Dude, why are you always messing around with animals? Hey! - Look, I'm flying a kite!"
    1. +2
      21 July 2026 08: 18
      Fantasy opuses are written during periods of exacerbation, when the mood eases, and articles from Wikipedia are reprinted.
  9. +1
    20 July 2026 14: 09
    For the author's information: until the second half of the 18th century, there was not a single nation state in Europe—not Belarus, not Ukraine, and certainly not Russia. Accordingly, until then, there were no Belarusians, Ukrainians, or Russians. Nations are a product of capitalism, not feudalism. Until then, people called themselves by the principality where they lived and to whose capital they brought tribute. Back then, there were no Belarusians, Ukrainians, or Russians, but rather Polotsk residents, Vitebsk residents, Smolensk residents, Vladimir residents, Ryazan residents, Tver residents, Novgorod residents, Pskov residents, and so on and so forth. The very word "Rus" was not the name of a state back then, but the equivalent of the modern term "Russian world"—that is, those who submitted to the Rurik dynasty, who brought this name to the Eastern Slavs.
    1. 0
      22 July 2026 08: 03
      If you think that there was no such nation as Russians, carefully read the ancient manuscript that has passed through the centuries - The Tale of Igor's Campaign
  10. 0
    20 July 2026 18: 01
    Let me remind you that there was no such thing as "Ukraine," "Ukrainian cities," "Ukrainian princes," or "Ukrainians." The Ukrainian state and ethnic chimera was created only in the 20th century.
    Samsonova is carrying on as usual
    Not a chimera, but a completely independent sovereign state within the USSR with its own constitution.
    Ukrainian is actually a nationality.
    I didn't want to read any further.
  11. +1
    21 July 2026 17: 56
    The piece about the Pechenegs is funny! Alternative fans will love it. The rest might just laugh. laughing
  12. 0
    22 July 2026 23: 14
    Very interesting, I always thought that the Pechenegs were Asians