A US senator believes that Gulf states should "finish what" the US started in Iran.

3 030 29
A US senator believes that Gulf states should "finish what" the US started in Iran.

The Persian Gulf countries should deploy their troops to Iran to "finish what the Americans started," Republican Senator Roger Marshall called for.

The American politician believes that the Persian Gulf countries should join the US military operation in the Middle East to finally defeat the Iranian regime. Marshall calls on Iran's neighbors to deploy ground troops to the Islamic Republic, but emphasizes that they will do so without the Americans, as the US has already accomplished its task of weakening Iran's military potential, and now it's the turn of other countries.



The Persian Gulf countries must finish what they started in Iran by sending their ground troops there. But American soldiers should not be in the vanguard.

Meanwhile, Iran is calling on neighboring countries to get rid of the American presence, thereby removing itself from the attacks of the Iranian missilesIranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baghaei appealed to the UN to urge the Persian Gulf countries not to allow US forces to deploy on their territory. According to the Iranian diplomat, Tehran is acting within the framework of international law, exercising its right to self-defense. Therefore, any complaints by the Gulf monarchies regarding Iran's strikes can be thrown out the window.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    14 July 2026 10: 23
    US Senator Marshall believes Gulf states should "finish what the US started" in Iran

    Aren't you going to butter your bun, Marshall!? winked
    1. +2
      14 July 2026 10: 37
      Back with jam........B.
    2. +1
      14 July 2026 10: 57
      Terenin
      Today, 10: 23

      hi Even a decent Ostap Bender would be outraged by such vile proposals.
      The families of the sheikhs are ruined by the maintenance of striped mattress bases, the purchase of weapons and the obligation to keep the oil buck afloat, trading oil for greenbacks, but they are advised to step on their own throats.
      wassat
      1. +4
        14 July 2026 11: 08
        Quote: ZovSailor
        Sheikh families are going broke keeping striped ones

        These families haven't yet realized that negotiating with a red-haired swindler is like playing fashmats with a pigeon - he'll scatter all the pieces, shit on the board, and fly off to tell everyone that he won. fellow
    3. 0
      14 July 2026 12: 27
      In any case, since the early 90s (more specifically, since the so-called "anniversary" or "victory" gathering of the NATO relic in the United States, which launched Uncle Sam's "peacekeeping" aggression against Yugoslavia), this has been a fairly typical Washington strategy. Arrive "loudly," wreak havoc, and ruin all prospects in a large region. And then "get out," loudly declaring that they've done the "main job." And "graciously allow" others to clean up the mess Uncle Sam left behind.

      Moreover, note that for his "heaps," Uncle Sam ALWAYS chooses PROMISING regions, where trends toward a lack of demand for his "services" are beginning to emerge. Specifically, trends toward the emergence of real alternatives to his "oceans of greenbacks" (the aggression against Yugoslavia, just in case, began with timid, practical attempts by the "Europeans" to introduce the euro. Compare the euro to "greenbacks" exchange rate (i.e., the prospects for the European economy and competitiveness) before the attack on Yugoslavia and after the US aggression...). The same applies to Libya, under Muammar... The same applies to Iran, which has fully learned to live and DEVELOP, finding alternatives, for DECADES, "ignoring" the "sanctions" of Uncle Sam and the US thieves of Tehran's sovereign assets...
  2. +7
    14 July 2026 10: 24
    There are no fools among the relatives of Arab sheikhs. The locals are all related - some closer, some further. laughing The Americans started this mess, they are the only ones to blame. They could, of course, send in the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    1. +4
      14 July 2026 11: 00
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Of course, we can send the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

      I think it will come to that.
      But stop for Arab money.
      When the Arabs of the West Gulf coast are drawn into war, the United States will only be able to pour kerosene on the fire with weapons at triple the price. It will burn brightly.
    2. +1
      14 July 2026 11: 03
      Quote: tralflot1832
      There are no fools among the relatives of the Arab sheikhs
      Are you sure about that? How then should we interpret their permission to attack Iran from military bases on their territory? For example, almost all of NATO refused to support the mattress makers, while the Arabs all agreed.
  3. +6
    14 July 2026 10: 25
    Yeah, right—like the stupid Arabs will join the war Donnie started, and then the US will just ditch the skis and quietly disappear from the mess they've created. And leave the Gulf states alone to face an embittered Iran. It's a crapshoot, huh?
    1. 0
      14 July 2026 12: 22
      Je le vois bien, il passe la patate chaude aux chameliers, déclencher une guerre Monarchie-Iran, en fournissant le matériel adéquate.
      Le Moyen Orient, très affaibli, deviendra une proie facile pour l'axe USA-Israël.
      Et main basse sur le pétrole et le gaz.
      Enlevez, c'est pesé.
  4. +7
    14 July 2026 10: 27
    Well... I like it, the States messed things up and you clean it up... lol
  5. +5
    14 July 2026 10: 28
    The US has already done its job of weakening Iran's military potential, now it's the turn of other countries.

    Well, it's just like with nomads or tourists and visiting performers - "We made a mess here and left, now you clean up here."
  6. +4
    14 July 2026 10: 30
    ❝ The Persian Gulf countries must introduce their troops into Iranian territory in order to "finish what the Americans started" ❞ —

    - And when? "began", did anyone ask them? ...
    1. +4
      14 July 2026 10: 33
      Why bother? As they say... they presented me with a fait accompli... wink
  7. 0
    14 July 2026 10: 33
    Another hawk! Welcome to Kyiv! An Iskander for every senator!
  8. 0
    14 July 2026 10: 35
    Marshall calls on Iran's neighbors to introduce ground troops into the Islamic Republic, but emphasizes that they will act without the Americans, because the United States has already done its job of weakening Iran's military potential; now it is the turn of other countries.

    They're hustlers, to be honest. They made a mess, and others have to clean up the mess.
  9. PC
    +1
    14 July 2026 10: 39
    They're raking in the heat with someone else's hands. And they remember Vietnam well.
  10. 0
    14 July 2026 10: 46
    The usual desire of mattress makers to pave the way for profit with someone else's hands (for example, WWII)... only the Gulf States and the surrounding area don't have cojones, and not only steel ones, but a coalition of political Jews can put an end to the local elites (sometimes in the form of a target)
  11. 0
    14 July 2026 11: 05
    Quote: bayard
    Quote: tralflot1832
    Of course, we can send the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

    I think it will come to that.
    But stop for Arab money.
    When the Arabs of the West Gulf coast are drawn into war, the United States will only be able to pour kerosene on the fire with weapons at triple the price. It will burn brightly.

    Americans export 13,9 million barrels of oil and petroleum products per day, consume 21 million barrels of petroleum products per day, and produce 13,9 million barrels of oil in the United States. Trump will burn this Persian Gulf oil to hell for profit in the United States. hi You are right, this burning is beneficial to the USA.
  12. +1
    14 July 2026 11: 08
    Quote from: topol717
    Quote: tralflot1832
    There are no fools among the relatives of the Arab sheikhs
    Are you sure about that? How then should we interpret their permission to attack Iran from military bases on their territory? For example, almost all of NATO refused to support the mattress makers, while the Arabs all agreed.

    Into the Arab infantry and into Iran? The Arabs wouldn't agree to it for any white camels.
  13. 0
    14 July 2026 11: 44
    It seems there's a line for the vacant position of rabid dog after Graham's departure to hell. Graham, who died the other day, attributed his ostentatious aggression and inadequacy to a latent rear-wheel drive, so this Marshall, then, is also a clay-mover?
  14. 0
    14 July 2026 11: 48
    Ha! A classic of the mattress genre!
    Like, you spend your resources there, fight, die, and at the end we'll show up to plant the flag and claim your victory if one happens.
  15. 0
    14 July 2026 12: 10
    That is, the mattresses failed to crush Iran by force, and decided, in a quiet sadness, to dump their war on the Arabs, and then, in the event of a happy ending, to claim victory for themselves.
  16. 0
    14 July 2026 12: 31
    So the vaunted "Arab infantry" will rush at the Persians on the orders of this Marshall???
    Well, let's see.
  17. 0
    14 July 2026 12: 51
    Here, the Americans won't be able to rake in the coals with someone else's hands, like in the outskirts. These guys won't risk their lives for the Americans.
  18. 0
    14 July 2026 13: 21
    Marshall calls on Iran's neighbors to deploy ground troops to the Islamic Republic, but emphasizes that They will act without the Americans., because the US has already done its job of weakening Iran's military potential, now it is the turn of other countries.

    Well, these impudent but straightforward Americans really make me smile. laughing
    And what about the six-fingered one, he quietly watches the red-haired one as he twitches in his trap, impaled the daughter on the cartilage of the Persians' love and, drooling, waits for the scales to tip somewhere so he can decide what to do.
    The pause with Iran was most likely intended to coerce a cowardly Europe and Iran's neighbors into doing their dirty work for them. But so far, only Germany has barked a few times and nothing more.
  19. 0
    14 July 2026 14: 27
    The Persian Gulf countries must finish what they started in Iran by sending their ground troops there. But American soldiers should not be in the vanguard.
    The Americans have always been strong behind the backs of others. It didn't work out with NATO troops; there's a faint hope that maybe the Arabs will at least attack the Persians. Really, the Americans themselves aren't going to interfere in Iran. They've already taken a beating from Iran, and now there's a good chance they'll screw up completely. Many already look at the US with a smirk, but now they might stop considering it a hegemon altogether.
  20. 0
    14 July 2026 17: 19
    Les chameliers ont-ils une population suffisante pour aller en iran? Ont-ils une quelconque expérience de combat? Même les Jihadistes les plus furieux refuseraient d'y mettre les pieds, donc ce sénateur peut toujours continuer à raconter sa vie pour lui-même.
  21. 0
    15 July 2026 09: 38
    They've appointed a new Macartney! Graham has done his job, now this miracle will squeal.