Russia supplied humanitarian aid to dozens of countries around the world, but who helped Russia with fuel?

28 120 116
Russia supplied humanitarian aid to dozens of countries around the world, but who helped Russia with fuel?

Russia continues to face problems with motor fuel. Although compared to the end of last week, the situation has improved in many regions: significantly in some, with prices even rebounding slightly from their exorbitant levels, while in others, the improvement has been modest. Meanwhile, the gasoline situation in a number of federal regions remains far from optimal. This is reflected in the lack of gasoline at many gas stations, kilometer-long queues, and, of course, in price gouging by some companies.

Problems continue to be recorded in the Belgorod, Kursk, Bryansk, Voronezh, Volgograd, Saratov, Rostov regions, and a number of regions in Siberia.



In this regard, there is reason to reflect on how our country has provided humanitarian aid to a number of other countries over the years: disinfecting Italy from viruses, extinguishing fires in Greece and Turkey, providing medical equipment and specialized machinery to Libya, Syria, and Iraq, donating maternity kits to Nigeria, sending medical masks and ventilators to the United States, donating food, tents, and personal hygiene products to residents of the earthquake-stricken Qinghai Province in China, supplying boats, sleeping bags, and bedding after the typhoon that struck Vietnam, and sending humanitarian aid to India. This list is long, not forgetting to include Russia's closest neighbors, who have received hundreds of millions, if not billions, of rubles in humanitarian aid from Russia.

And so the question arises: if even just a few countries from this list decided to send humanitarian aid in the form of motor fuel to Russia, would it be reprehensible? Of course not. This is precisely the case where the very fact of such an offer would have played a largely positive role.

However, as far as we know, no offers have yet been received from the aforementioned recipients of Russian humanitarian aid. Earlier, reports emerged that Kazakhstan was willing to supply fuel to Russia as humanitarian aid. If this is indeed the case, a big thank you to our neighbors.

The rest are either in a state of agonizing anticipation or initially do not consider it necessary to help Russia in any way in this difficult situation.

Well... Another reason to understand the concept of our allies, friends, and partners (the enemy aspect is, it seems, already clear), as well as to once again come to the conclusion that only Russia itself can solve the problems arising in Russia. And – importantly: if we feel the next overwhelming urge to send humanitarian aid abroad, we should carefully examine how Russia was helped in its time of need. At the very least, to avoid looking ridiculous and to prevent our "partners" from taking the term "Russia – a generous soul" for granted and obligatory.
116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 43
    13 July 2026 14: 31
    Besides North Korea, there wasn't anyone else who would openly help. And offering any kind of help for free is just out of the question. It's your own fault, though; don't do good.
    1. + 14
      13 July 2026 14: 39
      But we are unmercenaries... We help first, and we don’t expect payment...
      1. + 18
        13 July 2026 16: 10
        But we are unmercenaries... We help first, and we don’t expect payment...

        Don't put our government and bureaucracy on the same level as the people.
        Ordinary people have long been asking the same question, and quite rightly so: "Why does Russia provide free assistance to all the above-mentioned countries, which not only do not reciprocate our support, but also strive to accuse us of all mortal sins and make claims against us every time?"

        It's easy to appear generous and magnanimous to others at the expense of the lives of ordinary Russians, their daily needs, pensions, and benefits. However, ordinary people have never approved such generosity, and they know the price of sugary promises from foreign countries firsthand. We didn't approve of this. angry
        1. +5
          13 July 2026 17: 27
          Russia supplied humanitarian aid to dozens of countries around the world, but who helped Russia with fuel?

          Since 1991, Russia's leadership should have been thinking with its brains, not with its lower back!
          1. + 11
            13 July 2026 20: 00
            I remember when the coronavirus epidemic was happening, Putin ordered ventilators sent to Italy, even though they didn't have enough of them themselves. It's always been like that – the authorities treat their own people with disdain, unlike foreigners.
            1. +6
              14 July 2026 04: 11
              It's called showing off, showing off in front of the boys.
              1. 0
                14 July 2026 14: 18
                Quote from: miry_mir
                It's called showing off, showing off in front of the boys.

                It's not just a show-off, but an attempt to build an image and cultivate a positive attitude toward Russia among ordinary Europeans. And it even seemed to have worked. However, no one (as always) took into account the power of Western propaganda, which can easily call black white and hot cold. We don't yet know how to play that game. The aid has had a positive effect, but the cost-benefit ratio remains questionable.
        2. +1
          14 July 2026 11: 52
          It's much simpler. You can make money from aid through kickbacks. Or by writing off other countries' debts. I read somewhere that in the 90s, Russian representatives traveled to countries that owed Russia debts and offered to write off their debts in exchange for a kickback. I don't think much has changed since then.
        3. -2
          14 July 2026 19: 09
          credo
          + 14
          Yesterday, 16:10 PM: Don't put our government and bureaucracy on the same level as the people...................................................................... Hmm, who brought them to power? Who puts the Tsar on the throne time and time again? Don't separate the people from them. If the people were tired of it, if the people wanted it, they would have been flushed down the toilet long ago. But the people don't care, they're happy with everything...
      2. +1
        14 July 2026 04: 16
        We help first, and we don't expect payment...

        We also lend money left and right, which is then generously written off.
    2. + 17
      13 July 2026 15: 32
      Murmur 55
      Today, 14: 31

      hi We still remember with gratitude the assistance of the small neighboring country of Mongolia during the Great Patriotic War.
      These days, it seems that Special Representative Dmitriev and a businessman with the typically Russian surname Abramovich are negotiating humanitarian aid for money, since there are no selfless allied countries left, and everyone is experiencing the difficulties of the current period and fearing secondary and other sanctions for helping Russians.
      This is only a disadvantage for "ours or no longer ours" diplomats and politicians, who take into account only the interests of their partners, but not the Russian people.
    3. +6
      13 July 2026 16: 15
      I remember at the beginning of the Cold War, there were countries willing to actively help – Malaysia, Uganda, Myanmar, and a few others. But ours categorically refused, saying, "We'll do it ourselves!"
    4. +3
      13 July 2026 16: 40
      Quote: Murmur 55
      Besides North Korea, there wasn't anyone else who would openly help. And offering any kind of help for free is just out of the question. It's your own fault, though; don't do good.

      Nobody said a word about Belarus...
  2. + 13
    13 July 2026 14: 33
    They mentioned Kazakhstan, but for some reason forgot about Belarus.
    1. + 17
      13 July 2026 14: 35
      Quote from Denissdaf
      They mentioned Kazakhstan, but for some reason forgot about Belarus.

      I have no information about Belarus sending fuel to Russia as humanitarian aid. If you have reliable information, we'll be happy to update you.
      1. -10
        13 July 2026 14: 43
        Considering the pressure the West puts on Belarus every day, it could have been mentioned in the article.
      2. -31
        13 July 2026 14: 54
        It's really bad that you can't give the author a minus for an article. I find it disgusting to even read this. Everyone here blames the oligarchs for being ready to strangle them for a penny, and what about your own behavior?
        1. + 14
          13 July 2026 15: 10
          Quote from: topol717
          I even feel disgusted reading this.

          Disgusting - don't read it. It's like you were forced to.
        2. +8
          13 July 2026 19: 47
          Quote from: topol717
          I even find this disgusting to read.

          So go ahead and give your last, to whomever you can. Russia has always helped someone throughout its history, but in politics, you should help those who can give back, even if indirectly, and not be the suckers.
          1. -10
            13 July 2026 21: 12
            Quote: Dart2027
            But in politics you need to help those who can give you something back, even if not directly, and not be the suckers.
            You should always be human first, and then strive for profit. When you give gifts to children, do you probably expect something in return? Or when you give alms to someone, do you expect something in return?
            Apparently I wasn't raised that way. I didn't put money above myself.
            1. +8
              13 July 2026 21: 40
              Quote from: topol717
              When you give gifts to children, you probably expect something in return?

              At the very least, gratitude. But when it comes to states, the government's primary responsibility is to help its own.
              1. -5
                13 July 2026 22: 00
                Quote: Dart2027
                But when it comes to states, the main duty of the government is to help its own.
                In general, I've always believed that relations between countries are similar to relations between people. If you continue in this spirit, you'll soon learn that not everything in this life can be bought and sold. Joy, for example, can't be bought. Smiles and laughter can be bought, but joy cannot.
                1. +5
                  13 July 2026 22: 02
                  Quote from: topol717
                  In general, I have always believed that relations between countries are similar to relations between people.

                  In the land of pink ponies and unicorns, they may be similar.
                  Quote from: topol717
                  For example, joy cannot be bought.

                  So what?
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. -3
      13 July 2026 14: 46
      Quote from Denissdaf
      They mentioned Kazakhstan, but for some reason forgot about Belarus.

      Belarus supplies more than Kazakhstan promised.
      1. +3
        13 July 2026 20: 03
        The Belarusians supply fuel for money, but the Kazakhs offered it for free.
        1. +2
          13 July 2026 22: 20
          Quote: Fan-Fan
          and the Kazakhs offered it for free.

          Why such generosity all of a sudden? belay belay ? Everything is as usual - for the loot:
          02.07.2026
          "In the event of an official request from the Russian government, Kazakhstan is ready to consider the possibility of supplying fuels and lubricants to Russia. This was stated by the Kazakh Ministry of Energy, Interfax reports."
          At the same time, the department indicated that the conclusion of international agreements is possible mutually beneficial COMMERCIAL(!!!!) feel conditions and only in the case of free resource potential.
          https://lenta.ru/news/2026/07/02/pomogut/
  3. + 18
    13 July 2026 14: 35
    Until we learn to distinguish partners from freeloaders, we will scratch our heads in disappointment, be surprised, and bewildered... request
    1. -11
      13 July 2026 14: 53
      Quote: Major Yurik
      Until we learn to distinguish partners from freeloaders, we will scratch our heads in disappointment, be surprised, and bewildered...
      Why the author equated humanitarian aid with gasoline supplies, he probably doesn’t even know himself.
      If you want to do a good deed and then expect a reward for it, then it is definitely not a good deed.
      Aid after earthquakes, epidemics, and floods should be free, and it's embarrassing to even mention that. I don't even want to read an article like that.
      1. +8
        13 July 2026 15: 14
        Quote from: topol717
        I don't even want to read such an article.

        And that's why you've already written a second comment...
        1. -14
          13 July 2026 16: 02
          Because it's too low. It's a shame I can't write a third one.
          1. + 10
            13 July 2026 17: 04
            Quote from: topol717
            It's a pity I can't write the 3rd one.

            It's already been written like that))
      2. + 11
        13 July 2026 15: 16
        Quote from: topol717
        If you want to do a good deed and then expect a reward for it, then it is definitely not a good deed.

        Well, which side to look at ...
        Help comes in all forms. There's some for which it's not a sin to hope for some gratitude, at least in words.
        For example, I think we'd have a right to expect something good for the 600 lives that saved Poland today. At least not to participate in the war against Russia. But all we see is base ingratitude. A mortal sin, by the way. Poland might well be in for it sooner or later, given the state of things...

        "Do no good, and you will receive no evil" wasn't coined by the most morally upright people. But why does it almost always work in real life? It's a shame...

        I can say for myself that it's not the best trait, but I hold a grudge. I haven't forgiven Germany, nor anyone else. For past sins, and for today's.

        And yes, floods, earthquakes, and the like aren't the kind of situations I'm talking about. That's just human behavior. It's not about helping, it's about what a normal person should do. It's natural, like giving up your seat on public transport or helping someone who slipped on the street. Such actions are done unconsciously, without the expectation that the person who slipped on the street will help me or pay me later.
        And that is why I am absolutely of the same opinion as you here.
        1. + 14
          13 July 2026 15: 30
          Still, there is no point in hoping for Poland's "gratitude".
          If the Poles simply hate Ukrainians as "their serfs," then they blame us for depriving them of their imperial ambitions. Although, to be fair, the Poles themselves are to blame for this, with their "arrogance."
          And as for Germany, it's worth acknowledging that the GDR was our most loyal ally of the entire Warsaw Pact. The GDR was betrayed by our Gorbachevs. hi
  4. +4
    13 July 2026 14: 36
    In this regard, there is reason to reflect on how our country has provided humanitarian aid to a number of other countries over the years:


    To put it bluntly, life is bad without a sucker. Or maybe they cheated me again.
  5. -2
    13 July 2026 14: 38
    For the recipient, humanitarian aid from the Russian Federation is free, but those who supply/transport/assemble it are doing so at the expense of the state and at prices... at prices slightly inflated by a factor of 100 or more, hardly less.
    So foreign non-comrades do not owe anything to the Russian Federation.
  6. +6
    13 July 2026 14: 40
    In the global information space, which initially favored Russia, people still saw captured figures with Nazi tattoos, exhibitions were organized by various Western journalists who still cared about the truth, and so on. No one really liked this, but after dragging out this very goal for years!!!, the effect wore off, and when this information space was predictably brought under control, there was only one thing left: who struck first. No one will send humanitarian aid under such a label. Congratulations to our geopoliticians. Pardon the pun, this logic is just a backwater notion.
    1. 0
      13 July 2026 14: 58
      "Logic, pardon me, back alley concepts, so-so."

      The logic of the back alley is not to help the weak, the strong are at the top of the food chain.
  7. +2
    13 July 2026 14: 40
    And so the question arises: if at least a few states from this list decided to send humanitarian aid in the form of motor fuel to Russia

    Where is our friend Tokayev...whom Russia saved?
    A telling fact about the current crisis...so to speak, the result of Russia's foreign policy...we've arrived...we'll be drowning only the DPRK will throw us a lifeline...surprising.
    Conclusion... in our world raging with crises, we will have to rely only on our own strength....
    as they say...no one will give us salvation...not God, not the king, not a hero. what
    1. +1
      14 July 2026 16: 15
      We'll be drowning until North Korea throws us a lifeline.


      If Kim is completely stupid, he'll extend a hand. If he's smart, he won't. Abramovich and other scumbags siphon $200 billion out of Russia every year. And what normal person would extend a hand?
  8. -11
    13 July 2026 14: 43
    There is enough gasoline in the country, it's just that the faint-hearted doomsayers have created a panic at the instigation of the shakhalyaks.
    1. +7
      13 July 2026 14: 45
      It's not even about the gasoline. Humanitarian aid comes in many forms, and the fact that it's being sent is important, whether it's warm blankets for the population or first aid kits for the military.
    2. +6
      13 July 2026 14: 51
      Of the approximately 15 gas stations in the city, only one is fully operational. Another five only sell diesel fuel. I'll try stopping by tonight; maybe there won't be a line. wassat
      1. +3
        13 July 2026 14: 56
        Quote: Jager
        I'll try to come at night, maybe there won't be a line.

        I also fill up at night...but there still remains a small queue of about twenty cars.
      2. + 11
        13 July 2026 15: 16
        Quote: Jager
        Of the approximately 15 gas stations in the city, only one is fully operational. Another five only sell diesel fuel. I'll try stopping by tonight; maybe there won't be a line.

        What are you talking about... The "comrade" above told you: there's a ton of gasoline, and everything else is just crap...
      3. -3
        13 July 2026 21: 25
        When you write, please specify the city... and so... Murmansk... Rosneft, Gazpromneft, and Lukoil have gasoline with quantity restrictions, prices are normal; Vitek has no restrictions, but Vitek has jacked up the price.
    3. +6
      13 July 2026 15: 15
      Quote: Irek
      There is enough gasoline in the country

      Probably the Central Intelligence Agency sucked up all the gasoline in Crimea... At least we'll know that there's "enough."
      1. -4
        13 July 2026 21: 26
        Why are the problems in Crimea no secret and not a shortage?
  9. +2
    13 July 2026 14: 50
    Well... Another reason to understand the concept of our allies, friends and partners (about enemies, it seems, everything is already clear), as well as once again come to the conclusion that the problems arising in Russia can only be solved by Russia itself


    First, we need to put things in order within the aid from the Russian Federation itself: who receives it, why we provide it, and do we gain any loyalty from this to our counterparties from the Russian Federation (government, military, businessmen, tourists)?!
    Is the transfer of humanitarian aid accompanied by any PR campaign or press?

    If all this is not there, then you need to start with yourself.
    In the case of China, I think we're getting our fill. But in the case of Italy and its disinfection—questionable!
    And money was allocated for all of this and all of this had initiators.
  10. +9
    13 July 2026 14: 52
    Quote: Irek
    It's just that the faint-hearted doomsayers started the panic at the instigation of the shakhalyachi Tsipso.

    Well, yes, well... the doomsayers are to blame for the lack of gas at the gas stations... it's not funny for you to give such arguments. hi laughing
    The internet is full of discussions about the situation... why there is no gas at gas stations.
  11. + 10
    13 July 2026 15: 01
    Earlier, information emerged that Kazakhstan was ready to supply fuel to Russia as humanitarian aid.

    Do not supply AI-95 and AI-92 gasoline as humanitarian aid, but sell it in quantities of no more than 50 tons (the Belarusians supplied 80 tons of fuel to Russia in June), and only on the condition that this supply by the Kazakhs does not harm the needs of their citizens.
    Currently, the Kazakhs are preventing Russians from exporting fuel from Kazakhstan.
    Along the Chuysky Tract, from Novosibirsk to Gorny Altai, I see a lot of cars with Kazakh license plates. Maybe then they shouldn't fill up at our gas stations?
  12. +5
    13 July 2026 15: 02
    "Whoever helps people is wasting their time..." Unless, of course, these people are not ours... Even a "son of a bitch" should be ours!
  13. +9
    13 July 2026 15: 03
    We shouldn't expect humanitarian aid from abroad, but rather inspect all oil oligarchs, their assets, and where they source gasoline and diesel fuel. Professor Katasonov asserts that the fuel problem can be solved within 24 hours if we restore order in the oil industry. We should also force them to stop importing gasoline and diesel fuel, in accordance with the government decree, which no refinery is complying with.
    1. +1
      14 July 2026 13: 28
      It's only possible to restore order under holy capitalism, the Russian type; there are no commissars in leather jackets with Mausers.))
  14. +3
    13 July 2026 15: 03
    Russia supplied humanitarian aid to dozens of countries around the world, but who helped Russia with fuel?

    Well, probably the whole world believes that "a drowning man must save himself."
    No one is rushing to help for free. They're not like Russia, which during COVID-19 brought everyone masks, vaccines, blankets, tents, and other humanitarian aid.
    Even the Italians, who tearfully asked for our help, quickly disowned it, as if it had never happened.
    So, in the future, there's no need to be a global benefactor. You need to be a benefactor ONLY FOR YOUR OWN population. The rest can perish, since their authorities "don't catch mice." Because that's who the population elected.
  15. +4
    13 July 2026 15: 03
    Extorting humanitarian aid is a lousy idea. But in the future, given the current state of affairs, it's worth thinking long and hard about whether it's necessary to provide it to others. For example, those who are now modestly keeping their mouths shut and pretending it doesn't concern them.
    There's no point in calling these pseudo-states partners, much less "friends." Why divert resources to them that could be used in our own country? These endless gifts to Central Asia, to the parasites of the Caucasus?
    Now we need to focus as much as possible on OUR country. And these... well, they're not brothers, they're parasites. And don't try to win their favor with forced gifts or money. It won't happen. They'll simply consume, and at best, they'll mumble something inarticulate instead of a proper "thank you." This isn't soft power, it's a stupid policy of appeasement. And we'll look like fools to the natives. They only understand strength, and when someone takes the last bit of their pants off, that evokes a sense of respect.
    What's the word "unforgettable"? A friend in need is a friend indeed, or a bidet?
    1. +3
      13 July 2026 15: 19
      Quote from Wratch
      Extorting humanitarian aid is not a good idea.

      Where's the "extortion" part here? Then, by the same logic, Russia has been extorted for decades, so why shouldn't we mirror it?
      1. +3
        13 July 2026 16: 04
        It looks that way from the outside. We helped you, and you... don't look respectable. But starting a little gray book, for memory, is not a sin at all.
  16. +9
    13 July 2026 15: 05
    The Turks were fighting forest fires, they lost a plane with the crew, and they gave weapons and help to the Ukrainians!!!
    Those who make decisions about humanitarian aid to others should do so from their own salaries!!! Then they will stop squandering the people's budget money.
  17. NW
    -1
    13 July 2026 15: 11
    It's beneath the Russian Federation to criticize the humanitarian aid it's provided. Either don't help, or don't complain. Moreover, at times our assistance has been somewhat intrusive (e.g., during the coronavirus pandemic, to the United States, Italy, and elsewhere).
    1. +5
      13 July 2026 15: 59
      Quote from N.W.
      Either don't help or don't whine.

      I wouldn't help! But did anyone ask me or millions of Russian citizens about this? All we can do is whine.
  18. +4
    13 July 2026 15: 16
    The service rendered is worth nothing (c).
  19. +3
    13 July 2026 15: 27
    And who helped Russia with fuel?

    There's just one thing I don't understand: how on earth did fuel suddenly become humanitarian aid!? As they say in Odessa (our Odessa): humanitarian aid and fuel are two very different things...
    Instead of humanitarian aid for fuel, we need to buy fuel from India by the fleet of tankers, not the 60 tons we've already purchased. Especially since we have nowhere to spend the Indian tugriks we receive for oil. At least this way we'll get some gasoline.
    1. +2
      14 July 2026 07: 33
      In what nightmare, during the Soviet era, could one have imagined a "flotilla" of tankers carrying gasoline from India to help?
  20. +6
    13 July 2026 15: 30
    This list can go on and on.

    African countries can be listed. Grain was shipped free of charge and debts were forgiven.

    But what grievances could there be? No one forced the Kremlin to spend money on foreign countries instead of helping its own people and making its own people, not foreigners, richer. It seems the grandmaster has lost the geopolitical game completely.
  21. +1
    13 July 2026 15: 30
    Quote from Denissdaf
    They mentioned Kazakhstan, but for some reason forgot about Belarus.

    Luka sells gasoline from his two refineries to Russia. It's not humanitarian aid, but a commercial deal. You'll get help from a gypsy, right?
    1. 0
      13 July 2026 22: 13
      Is it okay that one refinery, in Belarus, is half Russian? Will you also supply oil to Belarusian refineries for free, as humanitarian aid, to be converted into gasoline? We mentioned above the volumes supplied from Belarus. If the "gypsy" didn't sell gasoline, then in Moscow you'd only be able to fill your car with your own urine.
  22. +6
    13 July 2026 15: 33
    So maybe first of all we need to think not about helping others, but about the well-being of our own citizens.
    It's not about whether the burghers in Germany will freeze or not, but about the fact that in our own country we heat with wood, not supply the idle blacks in Africa with free grain, but also distribute free fodder to our own farmers, not forgive the debts of all sorts of "stans", but raise pensions and salaries for doctors and teachers?!!!!
    1. +7
      13 July 2026 15: 42
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      First of all, we need to think not about helping others, but about the well-being of our own citizens.

      According to the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations, over the 35 years of its existence, the agency has conducted more than 590 humanitarian operations in 140 countries.

      Meanwhile, public funds were spent in a highly opaque manner: billions went to supporting oligarchic structures, hosting World Cups, the Olympics, and grand military parades, as well as large-scale debt write-offs and humanitarian missions abroad. The fate of foreign exchange reserves is particularly perplexing: there remains no clear explanation for why it was necessary to freeze and effectively transfer over $300 billion to Western control. Add to this the long-term subsidies to the Ukrainian economy, amounting to tens of billions. It seemed the budget was bottomless—but not for its own population. At the same time, domestic utility rates were rising, inflation was soaring, and the pension reform was carried out without regard for citizens' actual incomes.
    2. +1
      14 July 2026 12: 18
      And the answer they will give you, my friend, is the following... that you don't understand a damn thing about soft power politics, or politics in general, and it's none of your damn business where government officials put your money.
      As for teachers and doctors, if there's not enough money, they should drop everything and become couriers, or even take up a couple of part-time jobs. I didn't come up with this idea; former President Medvedev recommended it with all his might.
  23. +4
    13 July 2026 15: 35
    In this situation, only a fully sovereign, independent country (and there are no such countries except North Korea) could send humanitarian aid in the form of fuel to Russia. Otherwise, freedom and democracy fighters would be immediately punished.
  24. +1
    13 July 2026 15: 37
    Of course, according to the inadequate ones, we must continue to squander resources and help all sorts of incomprehensible cannibals and Central Asians. The USSR has succeeded, but it's Russia's turn if the men at the top don't come to their senses. Russia will collapse too. And with such a migration policy, they'll turn Russia into another Kosovo.
    1. +1
      13 July 2026 15: 39
      Quote: Chernorechye
      The USSR was assisted

      The collapse of the USSR had nothing to do with her help; the collapse was carried out not from the republics, but from the RSFSR
  25. +2
    13 July 2026 15: 51
    Russia also exports oil to NATO countries, where it is used to produce products for the Ukrainian army. So, for example, the "brotherly nation" could, on the one hand, undermine fuel production in Russia, while on the other, supply petroleum products to Russia as part of its "fraternal aid."
    In the end, it’s no big deal... Business is business, as even the boss says.
    In general, in this case too, the proverb applies... he who is born a fool will remain a fool all his life and die a fool.
    No alliance is based solely on ideas, but on the fact that each member of this alliance expects something, for example, military protection.
    And, frankly speaking, what can a “great power” offer other states after the 90s and the collapse of the USSR?
    And this is also the result of foreign policy, the work of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and intelligence.
    Unfortunately, this is evident not only in this area, but in almost all spheres... from the economy, people's lives, and ending with the army.
  26. -1
    13 July 2026 15: 54
    Well, apart from the DPRK, there was no one who would openly come to help.

    Do you really think the DPRK leadership is a bunch of naive kids who decided to provide free aid to capitalist Russia, which is directly related to several existing sanctions packages adopted by the UN Security Council against the DPRK?
    Most likely, we are talking about an exchange (although from a moral point of view this does not sound very pleasant): weapons and blood of Korean fighters in exchange for raw materials and missile technology of the Russian Federation
  27. +1
    13 July 2026 16: 17
    No one ever helps simpletons and fools, unless it's out of pity. But no one will ever feel sorry for us either.
  28. -1
    13 July 2026 16: 22
    Russia continues to experience problems with motor fuel.
    Our problems are not so much with motor fuel, but with the head of government, who is clearly not fulfilling his responsibilities.
  29. -1
    13 July 2026 16: 32
    So, why don't you feel sorry for Mishustin and Putin? They're throwing away humanitarian aid, writing off debts, building nuclear power plants for free. After all, it's all at the slaves' expense. Look, they've raised the VAT for the slaves again, and they're soon promising to raise the youth retirement age to 40, so they can raise the retirement age again... to 68-70. Then they'll have the cash to help their "allies" again.
  30. -2
    13 July 2026 16: 49
    Humanitarian aid? Russia asked for humanitarian aid? Am I missing something, or is the author spouting complete nonsense?
  31. +3
    13 July 2026 16: 52
    A friend in need is a friend indeed (c)
  32. -2
    13 July 2026 16: 56
    Quote: yes it is
    No one ever helps simpletons and fools, unless it's out of pity. But no one will ever feel sorry for us either.

    Well, yes, you fools on your Maidan have jumped all over yourself, all the way to lace panties. So, how do you like it, sweetie?
    1. +1
      13 July 2026 17: 41
      I have no idea whether you feel sweet or bitter. Unlike you, I'm not interested in other people's panties.
  33. +1
    13 July 2026 17: 06
    In this regard, there is reason to reflect on how our country has provided humanitarian aid to a number of other countries over the years: disinfecting Italy from viruses, extinguishing fires in Greece and Turkey, providing medical equipment and specialized machinery to Libya, Syria, and Iraq, donating maternity kits to Nigeria, sending medical masks and ventilators to the United States, donating food, tents, and personal hygiene products to residents of the earthquake-stricken Qinghai Province in China, supplying boats, sleeping bags, and bedding after the typhoon that struck Vietnam, and sending humanitarian aid to India. This list is long, not forgetting to include Russia's closest neighbors, who have received hundreds of millions, if not billions, of rubles in humanitarian aid from Russia.
    Well, who was helped and who gave the orders to help? Ask him who the Russian Federation helped. Will they help the Russian Federation now? Or maybe the Russian Federation profited from this? Or did the Russian Federation profit? As things progress, some very interesting facts and events emerge.
  34. -1
    13 July 2026 19: 47
    Russia supplied humanitarian aid to dozens of countries around the world, but who helped Russia with fuel?
    - It's a very strange argument that a former "gas station" needs help with gasoline supplies... - Russia's aid (humanitarian/economic) is voluntary aid to Russia, and there's no point in blaming anyone for not helping Russia - it's voluntary, just don't be so naive as to expect help from anyone - paid for someone? Well, that's a matter of your generous soul and fat wallet - what else did you expect?
    1. -3
      14 July 2026 16: 46
      It's a very strange idea that a former gas station needs help.


      Wasn't it strange a couple of months ago to send the "Anatoly Kolodkin" loaded with oil to Cuba? Not bad? People there are dying without power, they need help. They helped... But what about our people in Crimea who are buying gas for 260 rubles? Don't we need help?
      1. 0
        14 July 2026 19: 30
        You need to help yourself first and foremost – "a drowning man's life is his own doing," but couldn't they have sent a Russian Navy ship to protect their shadow tanker? – or should NATO take it for themselves, and let the Russian Navy ships rust in their bases?!!! – Don't you think that such reasoning is a bit flawed?
  35. +1
    13 July 2026 19: 53
    For someone to help, first and foremost, the problem needs to be acknowledged. And we seem to have a serious problem with that. Look at Novak's Jesuitical antics; he's doing just fine, it's just that these are temporary difficulties that are manageable and under close scrutiny.
  36. -1
    13 July 2026 20: 20
    So we have a white-furred, selfless leader. True, at our expense, a petty benefactor. He'll probably outdo Stalin, and won't even leave behind a patched overcoat.
  37. -1
    13 July 2026 21: 06
    Does the author honestly not understand that all the freebies sent abroad weren't without a kickback? Or were the numerous (and later written-off) loans to junior "partners" not always humanitarian aid either?
    1. 0
      13 July 2026 21: 21
      About 10 years ago, information surfaced about how the hustlers at the Sad Horse's office were wily writing off "bad Soviet loans" to various Bantustans for a 10% kickback in greenbacks. I don't think anything has changed regarding "bad Russian loans."
  38. -1
    13 July 2026 21: 14
    It seems like the USSR already stepped on this rake, didn't it? The problem is that traditionally, they choose clients who might be helpful, but they have nothing to gain from them except tests.
    In general, these are questions for the so-called authorities, which no one really elected, but which categorically refuse to change, despite obvious failures in absolutely all areas.
  39. 0
    13 July 2026 21: 29
    Complaints about the lack of humanitarian aid in terms of fuel are a complete lie...the country has enough fuel for special transport and for the army...as well as for public transport...here, by and large, help is needed in the form of additional fuel supplies at a cost, and, for example, the ability of the Russian Federation to build oil refineries for Russia on the territory of its allies.
  40. 0
    13 July 2026 23: 02
    Quote: Major Yurik
    Until we learn to distinguish partners from freeloaders, we will scratch our heads in disappointment, be surprised, and bewildered... request

    For those ensconced in the Kremlin, they are partners abroad. But in Russia, they are parasites.
  41. +1
    13 July 2026 23: 04
    What allies and friends? Only the strong can have them, and when a state starts to back down, the jackals show up, hoping to snatch a piece. Everyone in these countries is talking about how the bear is wounded and doesn't have much time left. And it's only our leadership that's to blame!
  42. +2
    14 July 2026 05: 03
    Quote: Fan-Fan
    I remember when the coronavirus epidemic was happening, Putin ordered ventilators sent to Italy, even though they didn't have enough of them themselves. It's always been like that – the authorities treat their own people with disdain, unlike foreigners.

    I worked for the Ministry of Emergency Situations for 15 years and remember back in 2014, when the Far East was engulfed in wildfires. We were sent on missions to small taiga villages, reinforcing local fire departments. We ate packed rations and slept on the floor in adapted rooms provided by the local administration. We slept simply with mattresses on the floor. We put out fires with backpack extinguishers and shovels, digging firebreaks. Imagine our shock when we heard that our Be-200s and EMERCOM helicopters had gone to help fight wildfires in Greece and Canada!
    1. +2
      14 July 2026 07: 08
      Quote: GueST90
      Imagine our surprise when we heard that our BE-200s and EMERCOM helicopters had flown to help extinguish forest fires in Greece and Canada!

      Showiness is the main achievement of Putinism.
  43. +3
    14 July 2026 07: 07
    Russia helped, supplied... Well, not Russia, but Putin, a lover of grandiose showboating and optimization. Never in our country's history have state resources been so ineptly squandered. The fabulously rich and surprisingly poor Russian Federation, what else can one say?
  44. +3
    14 July 2026 07: 15
    Yes, absolutely right. But this most likely doesn't mean someone is afraid to help us. Rather, it means that our foreign policy has led us to a point where we are simply not respected. We are perceived as a country from which, under the slogan "peace-friendship-aid," they must extract everything they can. And in return, they spit in our backs, and in our faces.
  45. +1
    14 July 2026 12: 31
    What humanitarian aid? During WWII, America also provided us with aid in exchange for our gold, and this will happen too.
  46. 0
    14 July 2026 17: 24
    NAIVETY IS A GOOD QUALITY FOR A FIRST-YEAR GIRL, BUT NOT FOR A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY LIKE OUR FATHERLAND.
  47. 0
    14 July 2026 20: 41
    God save me from friends, but I can somehow deal with enemies myself.
  48. 0
    14 July 2026 20: 54
    And so the question arises: if even just a few countries from this list decided to send humanitarian aid in the form of motor fuel to Russia, would it be reprehensible? Of course not. This is precisely the case where the very fact of such an offer would have played a largely positive role.

    Yeah, right. A US Air Force Hercules is landing at Sheremetyevo Airport with 20 tons of gasoline in barrels. It's humanitarian aid. Journalists, photos, a red carpet, the sparkling smiles of two pilots. Russia is saved, the planet is rejoicing. Or should we wait for more modest gifts from Libya, Syria, or Nigeria?
    If at a tender age you helped your grandmother carry her bag, do you really expect all elderly people to carry your suitcases now?
    Good deeds are done somehow differently, it seems to me.
  49. 0
    14 July 2026 21: 05
    A quarter of schools in Russia are in need of major repairs.
    At the same time, within the framework of bilateral agreements, Russia intends to build nine schools in Kyrgyzstan.
    In August 2025, it was reported that Russia had built a state-of-the-art amusement park, "Eurasia," in Kyrgyzstan, with free admission for children under 15.
    There is an ancient amusement park in my city, they took me there in shorts and sandals, entrance, of course, was paid.
  50. +2
    14 July 2026 21: 34
    "Russia supplied humanitarian aid to dozens of countries around the world, but who helped Russia with fuel?"

    When our government declares that EVERYTHING is fine, sanctions are helping the economy grow, production develop, the population become richer, and fuel problems are caused by speculation and greed on the part of the population...

    So why help us if everything is almost fine already, the queues are due to the lack of culture of the population and the introduction of odd-even almost solved the short-term problem?

    Should our friendly countries listen to our government officials? Or read between the lines and see what's written in milk instead of ink?

    And our government officials are certainly steadfast tin soldiers. There may be less chicken at the Pyaterochka restaurants, but we'll keep telling everyone that all the problems with fuel availability at gas stations have been solved.
    The only remaining issue is the population problem. A smaller population means more fuel at gas stations. Probably...
  51. +1
    14 July 2026 21: 35
    There is no such thing as humanitarian aid; that's just a phrase for suckers. There's only the squandering of the country's assets by a moronic government.
  52. +2
    15 July 2026 00: 32
    It is not Russia that has a generous soul, but the rulers who squander the people’s resources!
  53. 0
    15 July 2026 06: 11
    There's a similar problem in Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug. Only three gas stations are open, and they have fuel, but the lines are half a kilometer long, and we're stuck in line for an hour. Most of the other gas stations are closed. Where's the gas station chain the president tells us to look?
  54. +1
    15 July 2026 07: 01
    Old lady Shapoklyak was right when she said, "Whoever helps people is wasting their time; you can't become famous for good deeds."
  55. 0
    15 July 2026 07: 14
    People have long realized that the people working in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are no longer able to work.
  56. 0
    15 July 2026 07: 26
    Moreover, Russia (or rather, "our" government) has written off $144 billion in debt, including to its neighbors on the border. Plus, there are annual subsidies and preferences. But is this the fault of those who are accustomed to living at our expense?
  57. 0
    15 July 2026 08: 03
    So what, he gave it to everyone just to show off. Like, look what a ruler I am of a rich and powerful country. But the world is such that it's not the one who gives it away for free that's considered strong, but the one who
    beret.
  58. +1
    15 July 2026 08: 45
    Much can be said about foreign policy and Russia's participation in the development of relations.

    But we mustn't forget about our country and its citizens. How will they be protected in the cities, and by whom?

    You need to be able to protect her too.😏
    And to do this, we need not oligarchs and verbal statements from the UN platform, but strong Armed Forces and the military-industrial complex.
    Especially in modern life.

    We've all said before that we don't have enough of this. Yet? ☹️

    Next, what do we have in this direction?

    The register of Russian oil refineries, including those under construction and planned, is maintained by the Russian Ministry of Energy. As of February 1, 2023 (according to the Information Agency), it listed 86 oil refineries. Of these, 36 are considered operational, 8 are under construction or reconstruction, and 42 are under planning.

    In total, there are about 90 production facilities.
    And around all of them, as a rule, various chemical plants are located.

    Even if you take only these, it’s not much.
    What did the USSR have before? Yes, it did, and it wasn't bad.
    Taking into account the theory of military art, to cover such large objects in the USSR, there were anti-aircraft missile units, which, in separate divisions, at a preemptive distance, in stages, defended the skies in echelons.

    But almost all of them were killed back in the 90s, by the glorious perestroikas:
    - the heads of our government, with civilian defense ministers.😡
    Why?
    Yes, because the Armed Forces are a very expensive pleasure for them.
    And, in 100, 300 days, they needed to create Paradise in the country, their rating and earn money for their children.
    Lord!
    Teach today's people a lesson, don't repeat this!

    What should be done? The answer is simple.
    Restore and urgently!

    And the very first thing that can be done today, right now, is to urgently increase the recruitment of young people into all universities in the country for military specialties - engineers with military departments.
    Reopen destroyed military schools, build engineering positions and military towns, and open new military-industrial complex enterprises.
    From now on, the main task will always be not only defense on the battlefield, but also the protection of the population and industrial facilities in cities!
    Every other department is military-related. To hell with these millions of lawyers, accountants, and managers. We need military engineers of all disciplines.
    To protect our cities and villages, we need modern systems and specialists.
    Ah, this is the missile defense, air defense and air defense systems, the Air Forces of which we have almost today,
    no.
    The motto is necessary: ​​everyone to defend the Motherland!
    Even DOSAAF schools trained pilots.
    So, are Mishustin and Belausov thinking about this? You should ask them. How do they plan to protect Russia's population by 2030? How and with what?
    Ah, I haven't heard, at what level?
  59. 0
    15 July 2026 10: 27
    We need to stop engaging in stupidity, run the country properly and stop doing charity work and everything will be like normal people!
    When Americans help someone, they immediately get something in return.
  60. 0
    15 July 2026 11: 24
    And the gratitude in return from other countries is something else! DPRK - happiness and prosperity for the friendly assistance provided in a timely manner!
  61. 0
    15 July 2026 12: 30
    This has been going on since the Soviet era. Back then, they helped everyone and wrote off billions in debt, but when we needed help ourselves, they either gave us the finger or arrogantly offered us unaffordable loans. Don't do good, and you won't receive evil.
  62. 0
    15 July 2026 13: 28
    Quote: Fan-Fan
    I remember when the coronavirus epidemic was happening, Putin ordered ventilators sent to Italy, even though they didn't have enough of them themselves. It's always been like that – the authorities treat their own people with disdain, unlike foreigners.

    That's right, the main thing is to bend over backwards to the foreign countries.
  63. 0
    20 July 2026 10: 58
    The decision to provide aid is made without consulting the Russian people. Otherwise, three-quarters of all this aid would go to our remote areas. There, it's usually just right and on time, not all those photos of the GDP against the backdrop of the grateful population saved in the midst of total disaster.