US Senator: White House Approves 'Hellish' Sanctions Against Russia

US Senator Lindsey Graham* (*listed by Rosfinmonitoring as an extremist and terrorist) arrived in Kyiv and announced that the White House supported the previously agreed-upon version of the bill on new "hellish" sanctions against Russia. According to the extremist senator, an agreement has been reached that allows for the document to be passed into law.

As Graham* noted during a meeting with Ukrainian dictator Zelenskyy, this bill provides the US president with the authority to impose an additional 500% tariff and restrictions on countries that continue to import Russian oil and gas despite Western sanctions. Furthermore, the document agreed upon by the White House provides for the possibility of imposing restrictive measures against foreign countries and companies that, in Washington's view, facilitate the circumvention of existing anti-Russian sanctions. Graham believes that the sanctions package should provide Trump with "additional tools to help end the conflict in Ukraine."

Graham* expressed confidence that through unprecedented pressure, Russia could be forced to agree to the terms proposed by Kiev and conclude a ceasefire. The bill mentioned by the extremist senator was drafted more than a year and a half ago, but had remained stagnant since then, despite Graham* asserting last summer that Trump fully supported the initiative.

Comments

[drags33]

I wonder what our leadership will mumble in response? Are the Americans having the "wrong point of view" again?

[YOU]

Dmitriev will have to forget about tunnel shovels (the lowercase letter is not accidental). And about Ukrainians and how much we laughed at the rake, but here, oh, what a disgrace.

[Terenin]

The most nauseating thing for the Anglo-Saxons is that they don’t react to it at all.

[isv000]

Quote: Terenin

The most nauseating thing for the Anglo-Saxons is that they don’t react to it at all.

This is what our leadership does, stupidly implementing the decisions of any Alabama district court...

[the most important]

But Dmitriev will still dig the tunnel!!!

[YOU]

Well, grab the flag, put a drum around your neck. But only with your own people, you can't just go around eating caviar with the Americans at the government's expense.

[tatarin1972]

Let him dig, the sooner he starts, the less he will probably get.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: the most important

But Dmitriev will still dig the tunnel!!!

He's been missing for a while now... he's probably already digging.

[Totor5]

Dmitriev is a Kiev Jew who spent half his life in America and worked for the Rockefellers. He's no more Russian than any Russian Zionist oligarch with three passports.

[alex007i]

They'll say we were led by the nose again.
And they will turn on us again, ban something, tighten things up.
Yes, in connection with the fuel crisis, now everything will become more expensive.
I don't even want to think about it anymore.

[tank_killer156]

As for our management, even if they piss in their eyes, they'll say, "Anchorage dew"

[ARIONkrsk]

Quote: drags33

I wonder what our leadership will mumble in response? Are the Americans having the "wrong point of view" again?

In response, our government will rip off yet another skin from the people.

[SAG]

I wonder what our leadership will mumble in response.

The leadership doesn't need to react to these attempts by political impotents; let them accept Package 21 or 147. And there will be less whining in the comments and forums.

[alexoff]

Once again the bad British are forcing Trump to do bad things, what are you going to do?!

[bayard]

Our countermeasures—our sanctions—could be simple and very painful: supplying Iran with Onyx and Zircon missiles, both surface-to-air and surface-to-air. And also to the brave Houthis—to control shipping in the northern Indian Ocean. And an embargo on Russian uranium and titanium supplies to the United States.
Resume testing of nuclear weapons - before use, weapons must be properly checked, calibrated, and ensured to be in good working order.

[alexoff]

When was the last time we took countermeasures?

[poquello]

Quote from alexoff

When was the last time we took countermeasures?

Ah! Well, yes! They didn't tell you that!

[alexoff]

Have they reported it to you? You'll probably tell me now?

[bayard]

Yes, they are accepted every day, or don’t you see it?
Well, the spirit of Anchorage is dead. Let's remember and spit on it.
The West has been experiencing a global financial meltdown for a couple of months, and they're already shaking like they're in a fever with a patient's temperature approaching 40 degrees. To absolve themselves of responsibility for the inevitable, they need a pretext—a major war and/or a new "epidemic." Both options are ready. And the new head of the Federal Reserve, Warsh (Varshavsky), has already announced that extraordinary events will begin in early autumn. Why do you think they're all so crazy and rushing around? They have two options: either force Russia into a shameful "peace"/capitulation (which is extremely unlikely, and they know it), which would trigger the "epidemic" scenario, or provoke a nuclear war in Europe (which they're busily pursuing now).
This world is ruled by financiers and they have screwed up VERY seriously. Including due to degeneration, laziness and greed.

[alexoff]

Quote: bayard

Yes, they are accepted every day, or don’t you see it?

So where are we in this? Maybe our weather wizards also cast a spell on the plus forty in the Jewish quarter?

Quote: bayard

This world is ruled by financiers and they have screwed up VERY seriously. Including due to degeneration, laziness and greed.

Yes, but we and the other rabble always paid for it.

[bayard]

Quote from alexoff

So which side are we on here?

The term "we" in this context is read very vaguely.
- We - we are with you (you and I),
- We are Russia, the state as a whole, including the People.
- We are only the People, as opposed to the state.
- We are an undefined group of people who do not understand our place, role and purpose.
I can't say anything about the weather, it was hot here too. But now after the rain it's nice.

Quote from alexoff

Yes, but we and the other rabble always paid for it.

Sometimes, when a crisis arises and the culprits can no longer escape, they are pulled out of their palaces and hiding places by the scruff of their necks and dragged to the scaffold by the revolutionary-minded masses. But the people always have a hard time at turning points in history.
The US and Europe are in for a resemblance to our "holy (or damned) 90s." They'll definitely have a "fun" time.
But I won't say anything about us. Because, in theory, this will affect us less and, on the contrary, will open up some very interesting prospects. In the Duma, they're even talking about Gosplan 2.0. And on talk shows, they're talking about nationalizing the financial regulator and the entire sector, and even (horror of horrors) about reviewing the results of privatization. They're talking about the compliance of their actions with the law. And for some reason, they're talking about this more and more persistently.
And how could it be otherwise? These owners, who are on the leash of the financial international, also messed up. Especially during the war, which is still legally a military base.
Times are changing - measures, methods and degrees of punishment are changing.

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: bayard

In the West, the global financial system has been collapsing for a couple of months, and they are already shaking like they have a fever with a patient's temperature of almost 40

Are you serious???

https://ru.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/article-3301381
https://ru.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/article-3301418
and also in the USA and Europe...
and here's about it - https://ru.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/article-3301416

Be curious about where there is growth and where there is decline...

[bayard]

The real decline in the US real sector this year is around 12% year-on-year. The inflated AI bubbles, "Musk assets," and the like are just that—bubbles. 12% inflation in the real sector has been accelerating every month this year. These bubbles are simply used to attract and utilize "excess market liquidity." This is from actual internal reports, which is why Warsh (Varshavsky) is preparing the Fed for extraordinary events. That's why there are hysterics and emotional swings in the markets and among the governing elites. The financiers got carried away and missed (long ago missed) the moment when they could still make up for lost ground. Things are truly serious there, and processes are already underway; the countdown has begun. We're simply recording the fact, observing, and preparing for the most unforgettable events.
This will affect us to a lesser extent – ​​we don't have "excess liquidity"; on the contrary, we have an extreme working capital deficit. Therefore, further monetization will only benefit us.

[gsev]

Quote from alexoff

When was the last time we took countermeasures?

Perhaps for the first time they will accept the construction of several factories for the production of explosives, rocket fuel, and gasoline in the DPRK and China and completely stop the supply of energy resources to countries supplying ammunition to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

[YOU]

It's not so simple about the supplies; it involves training, the actual delivery, and as practice shows, their intelligence is also working, so they won't just watch. But playing with nukes—well, there are various options. And there was a reason for the Zeya article today, the junkie understands. And what's the point otherwise?

[bayard]

Quote: YOU

As for deliveries, it’s not that simple, it’s training, the delivery itself,

Wartime logistics are always tricky. And as for training... Whose pilots are these used F-16s and Mirages now? And who manned the Vietnamese air defense systems during the war with the US, especially in the first years after delivery? Who (whose crew) shot down the future Senator McCain when he was captured? Where there's a target, there's a solution.
Nuclear weapons shouldn't be played with, but used. First, for testing purposes at the testing ground—a full cycle of testing all types of ammunition. In a routine manner, with VERY calm faces and an unperturbed reaction to their inevitable screams and hysterics.
And if necessary, use it for its intended purpose.

[poquello]

Quote: bayard

Resume testing of nuclear weapons - before use, weapons must be properly checked, calibrated, and ensured to be in good working order.

This is unnecessary, the Americans need to test their sour nuclear weapons, then they can test their WMD)

[bayard]

Don't exaggerate the capabilities of computer calculations and analysis; practical testing is NECESSARY to verify the functionality of both new and existing physical/nuclear warhead packages. The decision to abandon nuclear testing was POLITICAL, like Gorbachev's act of capitulation.
The resumption of testing is a practical necessity and a demonstration of the rejection of the Gorbachev-Yeltsin act of capitulation.

[poquello]

Quote: bayard

The decision to abandon nuclear testing was POLITICAL, like Gorbachev’s act of capitulation.

and also Bush, Mitterrand, and even the Koreans a little later)

Quote: bayard

Minus is not mine.
Briefly about the simple.

Similarly

[bayard]

In terms of nuclear potential (quality and power, including heavy and ballistic launchers), the USSR VERY significantly outperformed the USA and NATO. The first act of capitulation (consider it unilateral) was the INF Treaty, when the USSR reduced even the number of launchers by 2,5 times. Not to mention the number of nuclear warheads on them and their power. The R-12 and R-14 had 3-megaton-plus nuclear warheads, while the Pershings had a single 20-kiloton nuclear warhead. The Pioneer had three 150-kiloton nuclear warheads. And we didn't even count the ground-based TELs for the Granat cruise missiles, although we were preparing for their deployment with all our might. At the same time, we "reduced" (destroyed) the Oka missile system, which didn't fit into that category due to its range. The US simply took its missiles home (though they were disposed of there), while the French and British missiles remained. Meanwhile, we destroyed the Pioneers (and other missiles) in the Asian part of the country. And as a result, we were left naked.
The second stage was the START treaty series, when we were once again practically the only ones reducing (carriers). The US simply retired its B-52s and "reclassified" the B-1Bs. And they abandoned the MX, because it didn't work out very well for them.
What did we cut? The Molodets missile systems? Almost all R-36s (all modifications)? Almost all UR-100 Stilettos? And what are we left with? Light Topols and Yarses? And we need to replace them with new ones every 190-15-20 years (because the heavy tanks in the stages degrade), while the US only replaces the heavy tanks in the stages of its ancient Minutemans.
So now we have to hastily build the Oreshnik IRBM to compensate for Europe's SSN capability. And how many new SSBNs had to be decommissioned and scrapped? Just look at the Akulas! And how many Kalmars and Dolphins... And now we're faced with the fact that our strategic nuclear forces (both strategic and intercontinental) have... FEW warheads. And ICBMs and SLBMs themselves are FEW. There are many enemies, there needs to be enough for everyone with double redundancy, so we have to resort to all sorts of Burevestniks. And life has shown once again that security, inviolability, and sovereignty require not just sufficient, but overwhelmingly excessive nuclear capabilities. So that no one would even think of farting crookedly in our direction. And let them be afraid, let them tremble, let them complain or grumble - it doesn't matter. No negotiations, restrictions or other shady deals. Parasites understand only Power, therefore we must have a lot of this Power. Always. As a guarantee of inviolability and sovereignty. So it was. So it must Be.
And then no foreign "central bank" will be able to dictate its will to us. We'll fire penetrating nuclear warheads at the bunkers. A double-barreled shot at each one. To make sure it reaches and vaporizes this filth. And then, looking over our shoulders, ask if anyone else is interested? In the voice of a Stern Teacher.
And there's no need to be afraid of radiation. Chernobyl released SO much of it that two or three thousand atomic bombs wouldn't produce. I don't think Europe would need more.

[poquello]

Quote: bayard

There are very few ICBMs and SLBMs. There are many enemies, there should be enough for everyone with double redundancy, so we have to resort to all sorts of "Burevestniks."

So, according to the contract, that's how much there is. Makak proposed to cut it further, so the bourgeoisie has been making plans for a long time, and Burevestnik, etc., is precisely to stop them from dealing with this nonsense.

Quote: bayard

Chernobyl ejected SO MUCH of it that two or three thousand atomic bombs would not produce.

500 atomic bombs, which is not that much in today's stockpiles.

[bayard]

Quote: poquello

So, how much is there according to the contract?

That treaty no longer exists. And they agreed to it in vain. So now there's nothing holding them back... Except their own promise to "stick to the framework figures" for another year. More than half a year has already passed. So now we can have as many ICBMs, SSBNs, and IRBMs as needed. We can commission new Borei missiles and keep Delfin missiles in service for as long as their service life lasts. We can deploy an additional couple of hundred ICBMs to match the number of designated targets. We can increase the number of combat aircraft, including by reviving the MPA.
And it is possible (and therefore necessary) to use nuclear weapons when your country is under attack by a coalition of more than 50 countries. For the creation of a coalition with the goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia during a war is an Act of War.

Quote: poquello

500 atomic bombs, which is not that much in today's stockpiles.

I'm talking about radiation contamination, including the nature of the isotopes (long-lived ones). The isotopes from a nuclear explosion are short-lived, so background radiation drops quickly. Everything will return to normal in a few years (Hiroshima and Nagasaki were rebuilt within a few years). It's different with isotopes from a reactor.
Besides, the targets for our strikes are mainly Western Europe, so it won't hit much from there. Thermonuclear bombs are fairly "clean."

[Careful]

How true... I agree 100%. How can "these" geostrategists not understand this?

[bayard]

Minus is not mine.
Briefly about the simple.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: bayard

Our countermeasures—our sanctions—could be simple and very painful: supplying Iran with Onyx and Zircon missiles, both surface-to-air and surface-to-air. And also to the brave Houthis—to control shipping in the northern Indian Ocean. And an embargo on Russian uranium and titanium supplies to the United States.

They'll survive all this, one way or another. They'll just suffer some economic and image losses—"an accident, but not a disaster." But what should we do if exports/imports come to a virtual standstill? That question is much more complicated. We're too dependent on it now. I'm afraid the minimum program will be (and that's still a very positive scenario) turning Russia into North Korea 2.0.

[Careful]

Are we going to spend our whole lives dreading and trembling? Are we not seeing results due to our current cowardice? But we'll get there anyway. Once we get 1000-2000 drones a day all over Russia, that's IT...

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Berezhny

Are we going to spend our whole lives dreading and trembling? Are we not seeing results due to our current cowardice? But we'll get there anyway. Once we get 1000-2000 drones a day all over Russia, that's IT...

No, there's no need to shake, but I don't really want to die singing either... You need to first prepare and get in decent shape, and only then "step into the ring" with the reigning champion. Otherwise, only chance can change the outcome, and it almost certainly won't be positive... Sometimes it's better to retreat to prepare for a counterattack than to die - "being surrounded"...

[bayard]

Quote: Level 2 Advisor

I'm afraid the minimum program will be (and this is still a very positive scenario) the transformation of the Russian Federation into the DPRK 2.0.

Why the DPRK and not the USSR from 1928 to 1955? If you're talking about economic autarky, then it's unavoidable. The West is a lost cause and a "Hunger Games" zone in the near future. Such people are of no use either as buyers or suppliers.
And if we're talking about uniting society to solve the problems of the survival of the state and the people, about purging the ranks and the vertical, then that's also from our past. The DPRK is a modern reminder of our past for us. But we need to return to ourselves, and not copy someone else's experience, which is, after all, unique.
Nationalization of the financial sector in the Russian Federation in order to exclude at the constitutional level the possibility of private, joint-stock and foreign banking for commercial purposes?
YES .
A review of the ownership rights of privatized state assets by those who sabotage the SVO and work for our defeat... or simply do not wish to participate in the People's Cause?
YES .
Enemies (internal and external) must have no property left in Russia, neither direct nor through proxy ownership. War is an indicator of loyalty and an affirmation of the right to property privatized through thieves.
Now the Duma is talking about Gosplan-2.0.
And about the need for SMERSH.

Quote: Level 2 Advisor

You need to first prepare and get into decent shape, and only then "step into the ring" with the current champion

That's what's happening, it seems, although many/most are indignant at the lack of a firm response. This (war regime) is precisely for accumulating forces, training the Army, restructuring the economy, morally and psychologically preparing the population, and identifying traitors—agents of the 5th and 6th columns. But descending into a nuclear exchange is easy. It's far more difficult to minimize the losses from such an exchange and ensure the survival of the People, the State, and the Army during and after the war. Here, we certainly must hurry slowly, and we'll always have time to get to "Heaven." The main thing is not to leave anything to the descendants of hell.

[Metallurg_2]

What are you talking about? Stop trading? That's not our way, not the bourgeois way!

[bayard]

Quote: Metallurg_2

Stop trading? That's not our way, not the bourgeois way!

What are you trading with them now?
The minus is not mine, but it’s interesting.
Parallel imports have continued and will continue, but we don’t have direct trade – “sanctions”.
So what is there to trade and what is there to regret? About houses, villas and castles there?
We can also build it up just as well and without the risk of it being taken away.
Do you like the climate?
So build yourself a greenhouse/winter garden and you will have happiness.
Did they freeze your money there?
So, in Russia, they have five to six times more assets under arrest than we have there. Either we'll exchange them, or (if you're a loyal bourgeois, faithful to Russia and its people) you'll receive compensation from the state after everything arrested here is confiscated. After all, you, a bourgeois, have nothing there anymore – no money, no property. This has been the case with many since the 90s, didn't you know?
So, the domestic bourgeois is obliged to be faithful to his People and his Motherland, to serve with his capital and assets the cause of the Greatness and Independence of our Civilization, to invest in the development of his own Country, to improve, strengthen and beautify the environment of our habitat, to advance Science, Technical Progress, to create New Technologies, to pay Taxes honestly and in full, not to whine, but to participate in the Common Cause.
Then you will be one of us, bourgeois.
And everyone will respect you and say thank you.
Do it right.

[Metallurg_2]

We're regularly pumping oil through the Druzhba pipeline. This oil is used to make fuel and lubricants, which fuel the UAF's equipment. I think that one example is enough.
The international hucksterism in all its glory.

[bayard]

Oil is shipped via the Druzhba pipeline to Hungary and Slovakia. I don't know if they supply fuel and lubricants to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but these countries have refused to supply weapons or finance used weapons. This is a murky "war" in which more than 3 million combatants on both sides have already died (2,5 million for the Ukrainian Armed Forces), and "we haven't started yet." But the question is, would there be something to start with? In 2022, there was nothing to start with at all - the Russian Federation didn't have a Ground Army, only border guard troops, nothing more. I don't even want to list what we didn't have. Now we have a lot. We need to "start" when the country and the Army are ready. In the meantime, we are preparing for the practically inevitable. Don't rush into Armageddon, you certainly won't like it there. I've been living in this war for thirteen years, and I know how the guys fight. Don't forget the gang that arms, supplies, and finances the Ukrainian Armed Forces. We have no allies or sponsors in this war. Last year's military budget was $115 billion, or about 32% of the annual budget or more than 7% of GDP. War is money, money, and more money. Do you have any suggestions for solving this problem? If we're talking about nuclear weapons, are you sure we're ready for the consequences? Have you considered them? And are you sure you want to dive into them?
If we can't do it "right here and now," is it worth tearing our shirts? If the compradors wanted to give up the country, they would have done so already in 4,5 years. Look at how much and what we've acquired over these years. How many and what types of weapons we've acquired, how many and what types of MRBMs have entered service, how many and what types of SSNs have entered service and returned from repairs during this time. They're currently churning out the Oreshnik series of heavy IRBMs (not with dummy warheads!!) at a Stakhanovite pace. Have you ever thought about how many of them are needed for the European theater of operations? What about the Tsirkons? What about their carriers? This year, the nuclear cruiser Admiral Nakhimov is returning to service from modernization. Can you imagine how much that will strengthen the Northern Fleet's surface forces? And by the end of the year, another frigate of Project 22350 could be built.
Today, there are already about 100 Su-57s in service, and by the end, there will be about 120. That's more Su-35Ss than we had at the beginning of the Central Military District. Just look back and see how weak the Russian Army was against NATO back then, and see how they're already cringing in fear. The only question is: are we ready for the consequences of our radically decisive actions?
And if you're not ready yet, then enjoy the "pre-Apocalypse", because after it it will be much worse.

[Monster_Fat]

The only tangible response is the transatlantic submarine data cables. But even then, Starlink will already mitigate the damage from their destruction.

[bayard]

GUGI will come and restore order.

[Huarabey]

It seems this elderly homosexual is running to a drug addict for a few kickbacks, and along the way, he's making endless promises to keep the kickbacks flowing into his pocket. And what will happen with these promises, no one knows. Trump is a real gentleman and a man of his word.

[Montezuma]

Quote: Warabey

It looks like this elderly homosexual is going to a drug dealer for some kickback money.

It's entirely possible to stop these scumbags from making trips to Kyiv by removing key Ukrenergo facilities to halt rail traffic, and the means are available. Plus, a couple of effective air strikes on the Kyiv railway station would certainly discourage Western visitors from visiting. Excessive humanitarianism shouldn't outweigh the need to effectively disrupt the enemy's logistics.

[jack no]

"" " De plus, quelques frappes aériennes efficaces sur la gare de Kyiin """.

Combien de civils innocents présents dans une gare? des bonnes centaines.
Ce serait un crime de guerre, et poutine n'utilise pas ces méthodes.
C'est à ça que l'on reconnait un Président, digne de cette fonction.

[poquello]

Quote from jack-no

Combien de civils innocents présents dans une gare? des bonnes centaines.

unlikely reason, we have very precise weapons

[Montezuma]

Quote from jack-no

"De plus, quelques frappes aériennes efficaces sur la gare de Kyiv

Parler de la structure ferroviaire dans le quartier de la gare, pas le bâtiment lui-même.
We are talking about the railway structure in the area of ​​the station, not the building itself.

[Careful]

This isn't humane. This is something else. All strategic decisions are 5-10 years late.

[Vladimir M]

And how much joy and hope there was for the "spirit of Anchorage", and look how it all turns out...
Although, it couldn’t have been otherwise.

[alex007i]

It wouldn’t have been any other way - some checkers in the port were given as a gift, kneeling down,
Now it has become fashionable to give paintings as gifts.

[rocket757]

Come on... let's turn on our... turntables and believe all their hellish and other sanctions...

[Alex F._2]

If the sanctions are hellish, then the mattress is the devil from Hell.

[rocket757]

This is not the first time we have chased away the devils!
Our ancestors did exactly this... we should wake up, remember, adopt the experience of our ancestors and go ahead!

[poquello]

Well, they'll turn it on, well, the dollar's volume in world trade will fall even more.

[rocket757]

Striped cats are good at shifting their problems onto everyone else... but it's all Shrovetide for the cat, so he'll have to answer for his everyday life, after all!

[poquello]

Quote: rocket757

Striped ones are good at shifting their problems onto everyone else.

that's not the word, they are real swindlers

[cat Crush]

Our people should have torn down all the front entrances in Kukuyevo a long time ago, so that all sorts of ssynators don’t go there with “good news”.

[Mint Gingerbread]

Who coordinated this and with whom? The indefatigable chatterbox. That's not 1000% right away.

[Kerensky]

Who agreed on this and with whom? The indefatigable chatterbox.

King Donald Windspeaker (C)

[Metallurg_2]

And 1000 is for the next iteration.

[Roman_Vasilyevich]

“Ah, it’s not difficult to deceive me! ..
I myself am glad to be deceived!

A.S. Pushkin

[doc_i]

Quote: the most important

But Dmitriev will still dig the tunnel!!!

It won't happen voluntarily. It needs to be forced. I'd say it needs to be forced as quickly as possible.

[gmss]

the elderly childless homosexual is at it again

[Div Divich]

And how sweetly Trump sang...
He lied, he lies, and he will continue to lie...

[bukhach]

Well, this is the first rule for any politician from the world of "freedom and democracy," and in this vein, even the frankness of fascist dictators is preferable; with them, everything is clear without any curtsies.

[Div Divich]

Our officials are also liars; they tell fairy tales before elections, and then change their tune and act as if they've replaced someone else.

[snow mountain]

Quote: drags33

I wonder what our leadership will mumble in response?

Lately they don't even babble anymore

[Metallurg_2]

So, it seems like there were already hellish sanctions under Samokhodny?
Shaw, again?

[Sergey3]

They never had this spirit of anchorage, and whether it has disappeared on the other side is a very big question!

[PC]

Did anyone expect anything from Anchorage?

[Martin Porubcan]

According to Strelkov, it was a time of respite for Ukraine and the West.

[Lisa Kerner-Timoshenko]

...and Putin so believed in the friendship of the Washingtonian Trumpler...

[Martin Porubcan]

We don't know what he believed in because we can't look into Putin's head.

[Lisa Kerner-Timoshenko]

We can’t look into his Botoxed head, but we can see how it works.
Just a couple of examples: the Yeltsin Center is still operating successfully; Prigozhin's murder; the arrest of Udaltsov and Popov...

[Martin Porubcan]

You're absolutely right, our politicians have staked everything on one gamble—Russia's defeat and subsequent collapse. So far, they haven't succeeded, so I'm escalating the conflict and raising the stakes. If "we" fail to achieve Russia's collapse, then the European Union will collapse as well. The United States and China won't suffer from this; they will still benefit from the war, regardless of which side wins. Ukraine is merely a playing field in this conflict. And Ukrainians are too backward a nation (if Ukrainians can even be called an independent nation) to understand that the West is only using them for a fratricidal war.

[Sergey Kirakosyan]

I hope he dies! I hope he dies!!!)))

[GMV]

What irony! The senator forgot to coordinate the "hellish sanctions" with Hell itself! 💁‍♂ He was summoned there the next day for final approval.

[Brenneke]

Madeleine Albright "moved in next door." The lady introduced herself rather pointedly.

[Vladimirius]

They'll wait, as always, and then endure. Perhaps they'll even reach a complete blockade, where not a single bird will fly across the border and no one will even talk to us. This is possible with complete non-resistance. As experience shows, any country can be pressured sooner or later, especially if it does nothing but talk.

[Div Divich]

The generator of hellish affairs went straight to Hell.

Zele also has a way to go, he has already killed many people, was a jester, became a murderer.