On the demographic and ethnic future of Russia

8 414 89
On the demographic and ethnic future of Russia


Turkization and Islamization


While the Old World (Europe) was inundated by waves of migrants, primarily from the Arab and Muslim worlds and Africa, Russia is being populated by people from post-Soviet Central Asia, Turkestan, conquered by the Russian Empire, and, to some extent, from the South Caucasus.



A study by the Institute of Demographic Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the reproductive behavior of migrants from Central Asia who settled in the Moscow agglomeration (DEMIS, No. 4, 2023) reports:

"Migrants are more likely to have three or more children (15% for migrants, 4% for Muscovites and residents of the Moscow region). And 42% of migrants and 17% of residents of the Moscow region are aiming for a large family by Russian standards (three or more children), which is 2,5 times more.

It's worth highlighting the differences in the age patterns of first childbirth among migrants and residents of the Moscow metropolitan area. For example, among migrants aged 18-25, 14% of respondents already have children, compared to 8% of residents of the Moscow region. This creates better opportunities for future births. If the first child is born when parents are 20-22, the likelihood of having a large family is several times higher than if parenthood begins at 30-35, as is the case in the Moscow region.


A study by the Institute of Demographic Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the reproductive behavior of migrants from Central Asia who settled in the Moscow agglomeration (DEMIS, No. 4, 2023)

A vicious strategy and its fruits


All this the consequences of the Western-copied policy of importing migrants and replacing Russia's dying and aging indigenous population. Back in the 1980s, the degenerate leadership of the CPSU (Communist Party) made a strategic decision to import unpretentious and teetotal immigrants from the Caucasus and Central Asia into the deserted Russian Non-Black Earth Region.

True, back then, Uzbeks, Azerbaijanis, and Georgians were in no hurry to leave their republics; they were already living significantly better there than the average in the RSFSR, which “fed” and pulled all the outskirts into the future.

Let me remind you that the Non-Black Earth Region is the core of Great Russia, the super-ethnos of the Rus-Russians, depopulated after the catastrophes of the 20th century (two world wars, the Revolution and the Russian Time of Troubles), including Khrushchev’s policy aimed at the accelerated development of the Ukrainian outskirts, the development of virgin lands, the liquidation of “unpromising” villages, etc.

In the 1990s and 2000s, this plan began to be implemented, under the guidance of the World Bank, the IMF, and other Western organizations. The collapse of the economies and the formerly prosperous lives in the post-Soviet republics triggered a wave of migration to Russia, the largest remnant of Great Russia—the USSR. Unemployment and poverty, with living standards plummeting to the level of the poorest countries in Africa, drove entire generations to Russia in search of work.

Migrants from the Caucasus and Central Asia took over markets, bazaars, and other lucrative "fields." Powerful ethnic criminal groups emerged—drugs, weapon, illegal alcohol, slave trade (including prostitution), etc.

Along the way, Islamization took hold, including the most radical movements, Wahhabism, the so-called "black Islam," and jihadism.

Even now, life in Russia, especially in the Moscow metropolitan area and other large cities, is much better than life in Tajikistan, which, in terms of living standards, is at the level of Zimbabwe, Niger, and Afghanistan.

In Tajikistan, per capita GDP is $1,2 per year—the level of the poorest countries on the planet. In the villages, where most migrants come from, per capita GDP is even lower—$600–$800.

In Moscow, the per capita gross regional product (GRP) is about $25, i.e. 30–40 times higher than in a Tajik village. This is the same simply a paradise for migrantsPlus, there's active support from local authorities—benefits, maternity hospitals, kindergartens, schools, free housing and land for "new citizens" of the Russian Federation, preferential family mortgages, etc. Plus, Russia has access to fertile land and water (compared to the water shortage in Central Asia). It's understandable that they reproduce in the first two or three generations until they become true city dwellers.

Therefore, while almost the entire planet has already accepted the model of a society of extermination and self-destruction (Degradation of Humanity and the Society of Extermination), is dying out and aging, then in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan the birth rate per woman is from 2,5 (Kazakhstan) to 3,4 (Tajikistan).

For comparison, the birth rate in Russia is 1,3, in Belarus it's 1,2, and in Ukraine it's 0,9. This is extinction. A demographic catastrophe.

А In Central Asia there is a real population boom, which began back in the USSR. Against the backdrop of aging, extinction and general degradation of Greater Russia (including the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belarus).

The authorities of the post-Soviet republics not only received an influx of funds but also dumped their most troubled, uneducated, criminalized, and Islamized populations on Russia—"wild" youth capable of waging jihad in search of social justice and overthrowing local authorities.

If current trends continue, the future of the Russian Federation is further Turkification and Islamization. The exodus of young generations to wealthy countries in the West and East, where they will become ethnic material. for Germany, Great Britain, France, Canada, Australia, China, Turkey and other countries.


Birth rate data for 2025 in many countries around the world
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 22
    12 July 2026 03: 09
    Moscow has already turned into Moscowbad. Some parts of the city are simply terrifying to enter at night.
    1. + 32
      12 July 2026 03: 31
      Well, we all know who to thank for this.
      1. +9
        12 July 2026 10: 17
        Quote from: FoBoss_VM
        Well, we all know who to thank for this.

        Let's say we know... so what? Can we start now? They're doing just fine without our "gratitude."
        1. +2
          12 July 2026 12: 02
          There you go. That's because we don't thank anyone.
          1. +2
            12 July 2026 12: 30
            Quote: Gardamir
            This is because we don’t thank.


            Because while there is something to "chew" on..., when it ends... "such" things will begin.
    2. -42
      12 July 2026 04: 21
      Are you afraid of migrant workers? It's crazy how timid you are. I bet you jumped from tree to tree in the villages with dogs, afraid they'd get you? laughing
      1. + 11
        12 July 2026 04: 34
        Quote from alexoff
        Are you afraid of migrant workers? It's crazy how timid you are. I bet you jumped from tree to tree in the villages with dogs, afraid they'd get you? laughing

        Don't underestimate them. Wahhabi beards are all the rage among the young people these days. They walk around in groups. Sometimes they even carry knives.
        During COVID, they took away bags of groceries from pensioners right outside their entrances.
        1. -33
          12 July 2026 04: 43
          Quote: Bearded
          Nowadays, Wahhabi beards are fashionable among young people.

          nightmare, beard! belay I'm afraid, I'm afraid! laughing
          Quote: Bearded
          They walk in groups.

          It's rare to see them in groups.
          Quote: Bearded
          It happens with knives too.

          You won't believe it, but I know two doctors of science who also carry knives.
          Quote: Bearded
          During COVID, they took away bags of groceries from pensioners right outside their entrances.

          what passions!
          But something tells me that with your fear of bearded men, you would hide under a bunk if you were standing in the vestibule of a commuter train and 8-10 perfectly Russian schoolchildren aged 13-16 got on and the noisiest one asked you for a cigarette laughing
          And it's scary to imagine what would happen to you if you met a crowd of football fans or skinheads on the same train who decided today to fight against the migrant workers who are threatening the country.
          1. +3
            12 July 2026 13: 40
            Quote from alexoff
            Quote: Bearded
            Nowadays, Wahhabi beards are fashionable among young people.

            nightmare, beard! belay I'm afraid, I'm afraid! laughing
            Quote: Bearded
            They walk in groups.

            It's rare to see them in groups.
            Quote: Bearded
            It happens with knives too.

            You won't believe it, but I know two doctors of science who also carry knives.
            Quote: Bearded
            During COVID, they took away bags of groceries from pensioners right outside their entrances.

            what passions!
            But something tells me that with your fear of bearded men, you would hide under a bunk if you were standing in the vestibule of a commuter train and 8-10 perfectly Russian schoolchildren aged 13-16 got on and the noisiest one asked you for a cigarette laughing
            And it's scary to imagine what would happen to you if you met a crowd of football fans or skinheads on the same train who decided today to fight against the migrant workers who are threatening the country.

            I served with these bastards in the Internal Troops, military unit 6604. I beat them in droves with bedposts, a shovel, and a crowbar.
            It is not for you to teach me courage.
            Have you ever fought at least 10 blacks one-on-one?
            The belt buckle is also good.
            But in the dining hall, it's better to hit the blacks with a chumika. I remember one of them ran on all fours across the hot stove, and I hit him in the ass with a chumika. laughing good
            1. -11
              12 July 2026 14: 00
              Quote: Bearded
              It is not for you to teach me courage.

              So that means you need to learn from someone younger than you, since you once served, and now in some areas you are simply afraid to be
              1. +6
                12 July 2026 14: 38
                Quote from alexoff
                Quote: Bearded
                It is not for you to teach me courage.

                So that means you need to learn from someone younger than you, since you once served, and now in some areas you are simply afraid to be

                When I was younger, I had a bit more health. But now, a PM wouldn't hurt. For shooting dogs. My eyesight isn't what it used to be. But I can shoot anyone point-blank, without a tremor. And I won't drink vodka afterward. laughing
          2. 0
            13 July 2026 20: 15
            Hey, you idiot, what skins are you talking about? Those last ones that disappeared in 2003? Did you just crawl out of a time machine or spend the last 25 years hibernating in the woods?
            There are people without a brain, here is a clear, excellent example, they all live in illusions about scary skins and football fans.
        2. + 15
          12 July 2026 09: 36
          "They walk in groups. Sometimes they even carry knives."
          I said it wrong laughing That's right - it happens without knives.
        3. +7
          12 July 2026 10: 22
          Quote: Bearded
          It happens with knives too.

          Come on... I would put it this way - it happens that there are no knives, but that's rare. winked
      2. + 10
        12 July 2026 09: 45
        Quote from alexoff
        I bet in the villages with dogs you would jump from tree to tree

        How do village dogs differ from city dogs? Incidentally, the chances of encountering a dog in the city are much higher. In the village, dogs are confined to their own territory and don't roam the streets.
        1. -12
          12 July 2026 13: 40
          Quote: Stas157
          How do village dogs differ from city dogs?

          In villages, dogs are larger. And in cities these days, dogs are the size of cats. Unless, of course, we're talking about industrial zones or similar places where security guards have fed the pack.
          Quote: Stas157
          And, by the way, the chances of meeting a dog in the city are much higher.

          The neighbor's Chihuahua? wink
          Quote: Stas157
          Because in the village dogs are kept in their own area and don’t roam the streets.

          Yes, of course, they sit silently in the garden, don’t dig any holes, don’t break loose from the chain, decorously and nobly! laughing
      3. +8
        12 July 2026 14: 57
        alexoff
        (Alexander)

        Are you afraid of migrant workers?

        Most Russians are frightened, both for their families and for the future, by what kind of society Russians will live in in the future, on their own land. It's not even frightening, but rather irritating that the highest authorities and officials are inflicting such stupid harm on their own country and the Russian people.
        And I assume you support the government's immigration policy, the lawlessness of migrants in Russia, and the destruction of Russian culture, mentality, and the Russian people? I do not support your views, opinions, or mockery.
    3. + 19
      12 July 2026 05: 25
      The topic has been discussed many times, and after numerous scandals related to migrant behavior, an increase in violations, and murders that undermined the Kremlin and its officials' attractive statistics, attempts were made to rectify the situation with the start of the SVO through the ostentatious adoption of laws in the state legislature and the deportation of violators.
      The ugly policy of loyalty to newcomers has created conditions for the dire situation and degradation of the indigenous population to suit the selfish interests of a handful of officials.
      Entire generations of security officials, civil servants, and other stakeholders have built their fortunes on the migrant market.
    4. +3
      12 July 2026 15: 13
      Quote: Bearded
      Some areas of the city are simply scary to enter in the evening.

      I don’t argue, I saw something like this myself, ten years ago in the Krasnaya Presnya area, we barely escaped.
    5. +5
      13 July 2026 06: 31
      "Migrants are more likely to have three or more children (15% for migrants, 4% for Muscovites and residents of the Moscow region). And 42% of migrants and 17% of residents of the Moscow region are aiming for a large family by Russian standards (three or more children), which is 2,5 times more.

      Statistics have the same problems (or features? belay ) that in the same Britain.
      "Muscovites and residents of the Moscow region" may be Russians to her, but in reality, they are, in many ways, the same migrants after receiving a passport.
      So it's much worse. Statistics, in general, have many ways to rig results...
  2. +8
    12 July 2026 03: 52
    To understand why Russia's indigenous population is declining, simply search for "Urban population tends to decline in reproduction." Therefore, for "Great Russia, the superethnos of Rus-Russians" to be revived, the causes of the declining reproduction rate must be eliminated. Then, incidentally, there will be no need to import migrant workers. But I don't think the author himself would want to live like that.

    The movement of people to cities leads to a decline in the birth rate. This is called depopulation. To simply replace generations, a family needs 2,1 children, but in cities, this figure often drops below 1,5.
    Here's why this happens:
    Dear children: In the village, a child can help with chores. In the city, every child means huge expenses for food, clothing, and education.
    Lack of space: In the city, families live in small apartments. There's simply no room for a large number of children.
    Women's careers: In cities, women are more likely to study and pursue careers. Childbearing is delayed, resulting in fewer births.
    Expensive entertainment: There are plenty of other interesting things to do in the city. People spend money on travel, cafes, and hobbies rather than on extended family.
    1. +9
      12 July 2026 10: 01
      Quote: smart fellow
      In the city, families live in small apartments.

      The entire world is already living in cities, and this process is irreversible. Those who cling to the village will sooner or later follow the majority. The countryside is disappearing as an autonomous way of life—or is being transformed, being integrated into the urban infrastructure. There will be no return to the traditional village.

      However, this doesn't mean people are doomed to live in high-rise anthills. Urbanization doesn't mean giving up private homes. Look at America: despite its high level of urbanization, its birth rate is significantly higher than ours. And one of the reasons is the settlement pattern, in which the business center is surrounded by low-rise residential areas. People have their own space, land, and yard, even if they work in the metropolis.

      Our small towns are dying, even though they could be the foundation for a new ecosystem. They don't need to be saved in their current form; they need to be developed as growth centers, creating jobs and a comfortable environment.

      I think the future lies in a symbiosis of city and village. It won't be a bustling metropolis or a godforsaken backwater, but something in between: urban in its level of services, yet rural in its way of life. Where everyone has their own home, garden, and quiet in the evenings. It's precisely this kind of environment—with personal space and a sense of "one's own corner"—that's best suited for having and raising children. This is the model we should strive for.
      1. +3
        12 July 2026 10: 59
        Look at America

        The birth rate in the United States is higher than in Russia, thanks to a steady influx of young immigrants and a higher proportion of the population being religious. Furthermore, economic stability, a high proportion of spacious housing, and a sense of security in the future encourage American families to have more children than in Russia.
        the future is for

        What the future holds is unknown. Perhaps radioactive deserts where gangs of surviving humans will fight over canned goods and gasoline left over from a bygone civilization.
        This is the model we should strive for.

        Humanity is spiraling through the cycles of globalism and nationalism, with dreams ranging from starships and Esperanto to martyrs and FPV drones. Now is the time when state nationalism, with its tendency toward militarization, is on the rise.
    2. 0
      12 July 2026 15: 15
      Quote: smart fellow
      There are plenty of other interesting things to do in the city. People spend their money on travel, cafes, and hobbies rather than on extended family.

      The answer is correct, I support it.
    3. +1
      13 July 2026 02: 36
      Quote: smart fellow
      The movement of people to cities leads to the fact that... because of which fewer of them are born
      Well, in general, these are the derivatives of the state's policy towards its population.

      But if it (government), really wanted a solution to the demographic problems of the indigenous population, then probably they would have passed laws so that in the families of indigenous peoples (nationalities) the material base would be secured, allowing us to solve the problems of providing for a decent family.
      For example, in the Slavic family (in the central part of Russia) where there are three children, the standard of state additional payments is fixed for each parent in the amount of 25-30% of his current salary (before taxes !!), monthly, to maintain a normal level of provision for the family.
      It is also possible to provide incentives for large families in the form of a reduction in interest payments on housing mortgages (!).
      In a family of six (i.e. already four children), the level of such "childbearing allowances" , calculated separately from the salary, should be raised accordingly to 35-40% for each parent (!).
      In a family of seven (i.e. five children), respectively, 45-50% of his current salary before taxes. Well, I think the example of progression should be clear to you by now.
      State bodies of social policy (for the protection of motherhood and childhood) and local government bodies (for the protection of motherhood and childhood, and social security), must monitor the timeliness of such payments and visit large families to control and monitor the microclimate in them !!That is, if someone abuses alcohol or drugs and systematically does not work (what was called parasitism in the USSR), even if he really wanted to ride on the state's neck thanks to such social benefits, he would not even theoretically be able to do this (already due to the lack of a permanent job !!) wink I would like to emphasize that such legislative norms should apply to the original traditional ethnic group of the population living in this region (!), and not Tajiks, Gypsies, Pakistanis, blacks... well, you get the idea. winked
      That is, roughly speaking, if this is Bashkiria, for example, then the parents of the Slavic or Bashkir ethnic group should have the right to such social benefits. In the Republic of Tatarstan, for example, Tatar or Russian (Slavyansky) origin, and their mixed marriages. And not gypsies, Arabs, blacks...
      Again, such (ethnically indigenous) families of young professionals (doctors, engineers, programmers, and the like) when two or more children are born, say up to 25-28 years old, they must first of all be provided with housing (or preferential programs for its acquisition/expansion !), approximately as it was encouraged in the Soviet Union.
      1. +1
        13 July 2026 09: 21
        each parent, in the amount of 25-30% of his current salary

        One person's salary is 200,000, and another's is 50,000 - it turns out that the "rich" will become even richer, but this will not help the "poor" much.
        should first of all be provided with housing (or with preferential programs for its acquisition/expansion!), approximately as was stimulated in the Soviet Union.

        Yes, the privileged will be given to certain categories of people, as was the case in the USSR, while those who don't fall into these categories will be left behind. We need to build state-owned social housing, and include a share of the construction costs in the rent, with a 20-year payment plan, excluding utilities and major repairs. And all free and subsidized housing programs should be abolished.
  3. +9
    12 July 2026 04: 21
    The collapse of the economy and the former comfortable life in the post-Soviet republics has caused a wave of migration to the Russian Federation.
    That's what's so interesting! All these separatists, who fought so actively for the independence of their republics, instead of starting to build a new life in their homeland, began moving to Russia like a deer. Armenia is a prime example of this. They were especially active in this process!
    1. +9
      12 July 2026 06: 37
      Quote: Xenon
      All these separatists, who had fought so actively for the independence of their republics, instead of starting to build a new life in their homeland, began to migrate to Russia at the speed of a deer. Armenia is a prime example of this. They were especially active in this process!

      They're not interested in the Russian Federation specifically, but in places where they can make money, which is why far more people have migrated to other countries than to the Russian Federation. Armenia is just an example of this trend. Have many people migrated from Azerbaijan? From Kazakhstan? From Belarus? That's right - few. People migrate only en masse from poor countries, and mostly from the "villages."
      1. +3
        12 July 2026 15: 16
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        Have many people migrated from Azerbaijan?

        We have plenty of them, just like Armenians.
        1. +2
          12 July 2026 16: 09
          Quote: carpenter

          We have plenty of them, just like Armenians.

          Here, the bulk of them have been fleeing Karabakh since their first war with the Armenians. The "fresh" ones almost never come, or they go to live with rich relatives in good positions, i.e., they are not at all from the poor "guest workers" in comparison. But the Armenians are a completely different story, although they themselves are not particularly new lately; they prefer France and the USA these days.
          1. +2
            12 July 2026 16: 47
            Quote: Level 2 Advisor
            The majority of us, even during their first war with the Armenians, fled from Karabakh.

            Yes, I remember the Azeris in St. Petersburg in the early 90s; it was something I can't describe. And then they moved all their relatives there, even to my small country beyond the Narva River.
    2. +4
      12 July 2026 09: 40
      "They were especially active in this process!"
      Why should they bother building anything? They're going to places where everything's already been built, so they can just use it for free. laughing
  4. -34
    12 July 2026 04: 23
    For as long as I've been alive, I've been seeing articles like these about Muslims being displaced and multiplied. First from the Caucasus, now from Central Asia. Some kind of cheap way to get views. How many children does the author have?
    1. + 18
      12 July 2026 05: 36
      Quote from alexoff
      How many children does the author have?

      How old is the author to care about children? We have one speaker who was SUDDENLY obsessed with the country's demographic problem, but she only has one millionaire son...
      1. +9
        12 July 2026 09: 41
        " but she herself only has one millionaire son..."
        maternity capital, what can I say? laughing
      2. -8
        12 July 2026 13: 42
        Quote: yuriy55
        How old is the author to be able to take care of children?

        So, how many years have they been chewing over this topic, and what's next? Nothing! Just more and more similar articles.
        Quote: yuriy55
        We have one speaker who was SUDDENLY overcome by the problem of demographics in the country, but she herself only has one millionaire son...

        Well, apparently the author of the article was also caught up in the topic, the only difference is that he is unlikely to have any millionaires.
    2. +2
      12 July 2026 15: 17
      Quote from alexoff
      Some cheap way to get views. How many children does the author have?

      And diamonds in your ears, worth your 10-year salary. Capitalism.
    3. +5
      13 July 2026 03: 30
      Quote from alexoff
      How many children does the author have?

      I see you don't have children, or you're just penning comments in favor of migrants for money. Because, with such a policy, the only way you can fail to see what future awaits Russian and other native-born children in Russia is to be either childless and mentally ill, or paid, or even sent...
      1. -4
        13 July 2026 09: 00
        So what do migrants have to do with this? Did migrants drive housing prices skyrocket? Or did they destroy regional medical centers and so on? Well, there were no migrants in Ukraine, yet the crime rate is higher than ours and the birth rate is much lower. How come Tajiks didn't come there?
        1. +4
          13 July 2026 10: 28
          Don't get off topic. Why are you defending migrants here? You have children, you live in Russia, and you're not getting paid for comments like this?

          Quote from alexoff
          Are you afraid of migrant workers? It's crazy how timid you are. I bet you jumped from tree to tree in the villages with dogs, afraid they'd get you?

          What kind of person do you have to be to not see a direct threat to Russian children and women?
          1. -6
            13 July 2026 10: 51
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Don't get off topic, why are you defending migrants here?

            I'm generally against attacks on people based on nationality and the like. When they blame everything on migrants, the Unified State Exam generation, and so on.
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            What kind of person do you have to be to not see a direct threat to Russian children and women?

            What kind of hysteria is this? This is like the feminist clamor that all men are rapists.
            1. +1
              14 July 2026 02: 55
              Quote from alexoff
              What kind of hysteria is this? This is like the feminist clamor that all men are rapists.

              It's already clear that you are a paid foreign childless individual...
              1. -2
                14 July 2026 12: 15
                It's clear that you have nothing to say in response, so you're trying to resort to insults, a representative of the generation that lost the superpower.
                1. 0
                  15 July 2026 03: 08
                  Quote from alexoff
                  It's clear that you have nothing to say in response, so you're trying to resort to insults, a representative of the generation that lost the superpower.

                  You, my friend, are working for the scum who are bringing masses of savages into Russia. Strictly according to London's manuals. Because you "don't see" the threat to Russians and other indigenous peoples of Russia. And you "don't see" the already clear, sharp increase in crimes against women and children perpetrated by this mass of "specialists."
                  This means that you yourself are either interested in this, or are intellectually insufficient to understand it.
                  And you still haven't answered who you are.

                  Quote: Vladimir_2U
                  You have children, you live in Russia, and you don’t get paid for comments like these?
  5. +5
    12 July 2026 05: 03
    If, on the very rare occasion, the USSR's enemies do something well, they're sure to do something bad later. Thus, thanks to the enormous free income from increased global prices for Soviet raw materials and industrial exports, they raised wages and pensions above actual inflation in the 2000s, and the birth rate rose to 1,9 million people per year. Then they stopped doing this, and the birth rate began to decline, and now it's fallen to 1,2 million per year, just like in the famine-ridden 1990s.
    1. 0
      12 July 2026 15: 20
      Quote: tatra
      And then they stopped doing this, and the birth rate began to decline, and now it has fallen to 1,2 million a year, like in the hungry 90s.

      And by working and living in Russia, Tajiks have raised their birth rate to 4,3 per woman.
  6. +5
    12 July 2026 05: 07
    It must be acknowledged that in 2011, Europe was flooded with migrants fleeing war and famine. It was only later, having learned about the good life in Europe, that they flocked to seek a better life. Our situation is different. Here, I believe the most important thing is one law for everyone. Sometimes, we treat migrants like foreigners, and respect for foreigners is in our blood. Speaking about our own demographics, I believe our people should be healthy and intelligent. To achieve this, we must pay special attention to healthcare and education. There should be ample supply of doctors and teachers.
    1. +3
      12 July 2026 08: 48
      God willing, there might be 1% of them who fled war and famine. The rest are those who want to trade their poverty for the wealthy West. They're especially comfortable in social Europe, where all you can do is reproduce and earn good money for it (they count it as work).
      1. 0
        13 July 2026 04: 58
        Misha. Running from the bombings and typing on a keyboard while drinking coffee are two different things. God forbid we have to experience all of this ourselves.
    2. +2
      12 July 2026 15: 21
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      To achieve this, special attention must be paid to healthcare and education. There must be ample supply of both doctors and teachers.

      Bring back the Russian village, that's the main thing.
      1. 0
        13 July 2026 14: 57
        Bring back the Russian village, that's the main thing.

        Why then are the Amish living in CITIES USA, do they give birth to 8 children?
        1. +1
          13 July 2026 19: 32
          The Amish don't live in cities. I mean large cities, not the small towns that have city status.
  7. + 12
    12 July 2026 05: 16
    And all the enemy states of the USSR on the territory of the USSR they captured have existed for 35 years thanks to the FREEBIES they got from the USSR, and there is no merit to any of them that they got the republic of the USSR, which the communists and their supporters made the richest, most developed, with the largest number of explored and equipped deposits
  8. + 15
    12 July 2026 05: 33
    The State Migration Service and Yeltsin Bank have done everything they can to destroy our country. The current government cares only about staying in office. Killing people's desire to start families in just a quarter of a century—that must have taken some effort. Descendants (if any remain) will curse these shape-shifters for their ploys and innovations...
    Everything is going according to plan...According to Allen Dulles' plan...
  9. + 15
    12 July 2026 05: 34
    It's enough to read the three-year Action Plan for the Implementation of the State National Policy Strategy adopted by the Russian Government, which briefly mentions the "Russian people," and even comes up with the idea of ​​opening ethnic classes in schools—essentially, ethno-enclaves.
    They continue to build a chimerical national policy without the Russian people.
    1. +2
      13 July 2026 17: 12
      Quote: Gunter
      State national policy strategies, which make only passing reference to the "Russian people," have even come up with the idea of ​​opening ethnic classes in schools—essentially, ethno-enclaves.

      It's the most unfortunate thing when ethnic classes are opened in your country. A country should have only one language. The Bolsheviks made this mistake when they created the Union, organizing ethnic republics. We all see what that led to.
      1. +2
        14 July 2026 18: 21
        There is such a concept, probably even scientific - titular nation... This was the case in Tsarist Russia.
        And now... It's unfortunate.
  10. + 13
    12 July 2026 06: 55
    Back in the 1980s, the degenerate leadership of the CPSU (Communist Party) made a strategic decision to import unpretentious and teetotal immigrants from the Caucasus and Central Asia into the deserted Russian Non-Black Earth Region.
    Yeah...huh? Could you give more details and preferably a link to the document, resolution, there is a Politburo, the Central Committee of the CPSU, etc. For example, I remember the resolution of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR of August 1, 1985 No. 723 "On additional measures for the development of the network of public roads in the RSFSR", then the resolution of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR of February 19, 1988 No. 272 ​​"On the state program for the construction and reconstruction of roads in the Non-Black Earth Zone of the RSFSR", asphalt paving began in my Bryansk region, as well as Smolensk region, Pskov region. Since the mid-80s, I have been driving from St. Petersburg back and forth through these regions. The Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR issued a decree on March 20, 1974, "On Measures for the Further Development of Agriculture in the Non-Black Earth Zone of the RSFSR." The program was designed for 15 years (until 1990) and included three stages, with the 80s falling within the second stage. The goal of this decree was to transform the Non-Black Earth Zone into a zone of highly developed agriculture: to ensure that the region would be fully self-sufficient in food, as well as in industrial centers. and in the village the personnel - LOCAL - have become establishedTo this end, infrastructure was developed. Large and medium-sized livestock farms were built, with mechanized processes, approximately 60 km of paved roads were laid throughout the entire period, and housing—more than 1,5 million apartments—was constructed in rural areas, as well as social and cultural facilities: schools, kindergartens, hospitals, community centers, stores, and consumer services. Gasification (gas pipelines) and electrification of power lines and substations were carried out. And most importantly—They implemented social policies. To attract and retain people in rural areas, they introduced benefits for young professionals, allowances, free housing, and salary supplements. They also increased wages on collective and state farms by an average of 30–40% compared to 1970, and developed the service sector. . Even there are no hints for the import of apricots from Central Asia. Where did Samsonov dig this up from? recourse But recently, State Duma deputy from United Russia Vladimir Vasiliev stated on the Rossiya TV channel:
    The migration issue is a difficult one. It arose as a simple solution to the complex threat of terrorism and the threat of instability in the Central Asian states. Our allied duty and fraternal relations opened the door to migrants so that they [the rulers of the former Soviet republics] could somehow channel this volatile youth environment to us.
    Moreover, Vasiliev is no ordinary person; he served as Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs. For three years, from October 2017 to October 2020, he headed the Republic of Dagestan. And CAM He spoke on this topic, saying that the labor shortage is becoming a real constraint on Russia's economic growth. The president noted that the country needs an influx of migrants, and further especially those who are bearers of Russian culture!? Are these bogeymen, the bearers of Russian culture!?
    The president made this statement in response to a statement from Bohdan Bezpalko, a member of the Presidential Council on Interethnic Relations. He spoke about the problems faced by newcomers, including the refusal of medical institutions to renew their policies until July 15, as per the presidential decree. Bezpalko also stated that migrants are effectively forced to pay for assistance in obtaining Russian citizenship.

    "The restrictions you mentioned, in my opinion, are harmful, and, of course, they must be eliminated," the head of state responded.
    And in general; "We are not against the growth of the Islamic population, on the contrary, we are happy with what is happening now in the Russian Federation. In some of our republics, predominantly with Islamic populations, we have a very good birth rate, we are very happy." "They don't know what they are doing" or vice versa - consciously Is that what they do? And the Soviet government, you see, is to blame for the fact that 35 years after its overthrow, current, semi-feudal began to import migrant workers from Asia. stop
    1. +2
      13 July 2026 17: 29
      Quote: Unknown
      And then, you see, the Soviet government is to blame for the fact that 35 years after its overthrow, the current, semi-feudal government began to import migrant workers from Asia.

      Thirty-five years ago, the country was a power with enormous scientific and industrial potential; we were pioneers in space exploration. Meanwhile, 35 years ago, China lived like the countries of sub-Saharan Africa. Today, China is the world's largest industrial power: it produces nearly 50 percent of the world's primary industrial goods, and over 25 percent of the world's transportation supplies.
      China is also the world's largest manufacturer of ships, high-speed trains, not to mention space.
      What have they done in Russia during this time?
      1. +1
        14 July 2026 18: 25
        And those who did nothing during the time allotted by history dare to tell us not to pick our noses...
    2. 0
      31 July 2026 07: 19
      The Soviet Union had ambitious plans, but it's a shame they weren't implemented. For example, despite their plans to "keep young people in the countryside," it didn't work out very well.
  11. +7
    12 July 2026 06: 57
    For comparison, the birth rate in Russia is 1,3, in Belarus it's 1,2, and in Ukraine it's 0,9. This is extinction. A demographic catastrophe.

    Starting a war at a time like this is a shot at Russia's future. What good is Ukraine to Russians if there's no one left to live in its ruins?
    1. +7
      12 July 2026 08: 53
      Starting a war at a time like this is a shot at Russia's future. What good is Ukraine to Russians if there's no one left to live in its ruins?


      Africans, Indians, Bangladeshis and Pakistanis will be resettled there.
    2. +9
      12 July 2026 09: 01
      The oligarchs need this. After 2014, they started terrorizing businesses in Ukraine, pushing out Russian oligarchs. That's when their patience snapped in February 2022.
  12. + 13
    12 July 2026 07: 06
    It's interesting, just recently everyone was happy that he'd taken us away from the 90s. But he's cleverly circled around and brought us back to the 90s, only in a slightly different way.
    1. +8
      12 July 2026 09: 44
      "brought me back to the 90s, only a little differently."
      Well, yes, he came from behind laughing
      1. +9
        12 July 2026 09: 47
        Every year he received many times more income from the export of natural resources and raw materials than his benefactors who placed him on the "throne" received, and the result is that he still has the same raw materials-import economy that he adopted a quarter of a century ago.
  13. + 11
    12 July 2026 07: 21
    Since Moscow already has at least 3,000,000 Muslims, it is already the most Muslim city not only in Russia but also in Europe. Even if such a horde of Muslims were officially encouraged to come and live in Moscow, they would be unable to manage it without strict discipline and hierarchy, which is characteristic of only two structures: the army and the mafia. Here, everything is simpler—but more frightening!
    Organized mafia bosses, known as "diasporas," provide themselves and their mafia with fighters for the hour of truth. They ensure that these fighters—the army—don't start a riot prematurely or spontaneously, i.e., before the hour of truth. Incidentally, women there are like incubators, so their army will always be supplied with fighters!
    This was only possible under a weak ruler and a system called democracy. There are countless pictures of local khans, emirs, bais, and even simple aksakals bowing their heads in Turkestan to greet not only the Russian Emperor, but even the viceroy of the Russian Governor-General. Even under the weak ruler Nicholas II, none of these khans, emirs, or bais attempted sabotage, a coup, or the dismantling of the Empire. Because they were afraid! And the way Brezhnev was greeted there is downright fairytale-like. And under the "liquid" rulers of Gorbachev and Yeltsin, Russians were not only driven out of Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan, but also physically exterminated!!!
    The result of all this is that the current ruler drags Kazakh, Uzbek, and Tajik bais, as if they were absolutely equal, by the hand through all sorts of BRICS and CSTO organizations. They're full of arrogance, and during personal meetings and visits, they spit and timidly set conditions for Russia: how many of these Muslim migrants will be sent to Russia, and that Russia will leave this crowd of greeters, i.e., the mafia called "diaspora" and its leaders, alone. By the way, don't be naive in thinking that highly educated or even intellectual people, people who understand, for example, Islamic fundamentalism, are being sent to Russia from these Kazakhstans and other Tajiks. Are you kidding me! Kazakhstan and Tajikistan need people like that themselves. But from the villages and kishlaks they will attract and gather Muslim fanatics, who are in principle dangerous even to the authorities in Tajikistan, and forward them to Russia...
    1. +3
      12 July 2026 07: 50
      Quote: north 2
      The result of all this is that now the current ruler of the Kazakh, Uzbek and Tajik bais, as absolutely equal, drags them by the hand to all sorts of BRICS and CSTO, they are full of arrogance, and during personal meetings and visits, they spit through their lips and set conditions for Russia

      You've described historical realities, but what does this have to do with today? In the past, when they bowed down to their leaders, were they really a separate, independent country? Yes, those were their leaders, but now, the Russian Federation is absolutely not their leader. It's as if you're still living in the USSR... And with other countries, yes, it's more difficult than with those who obey you by law... They're looking at how strong and profitable you are...
  14. +3
    12 July 2026 09: 46
    The purchase of migrants to satisfy the need for labor is a global trend, and the greater the economic gap between states, the stronger the migration flow to developed states with a higher standard of living. The difference between Russia, the EU, and the US is that the EU and the US support migrants at others' expense, profiting both by plundering the resources of underdeveloped states and by exploiting migrants. Russia, however, supports migrants at its own expense, failing to find effective, targeted uses for them and essentially abandoning them to their own devices. To earn a living, they choose the path of least investment with the fastest and highest return, and this is a direct route to trade, where they are successfully displacing small native shopkeepers. The topic of migrant overabundance speaks to the need for labor and ineffective migration policies, which ultimately cause economic, political, and social damage.
  15. + 10
    12 July 2026 09: 46
    It is already becoming obvious who Russia's real enemy is. And it is not migrants.
  16. +2
    12 July 2026 10: 45
    No one, perhaps with the exception of medieval Japan, was able to successfully resist migration processes, and this led to its backwardness.
    The question is, what and how should authorities, ideologists, cultural figures, and law enforcement agencies do on their own (!) territory to ensure that migrants are law-abiding and useful, and that they are not considered foreigners in the second generation?
    There are, after all, negative examples, especially when migration is supervised/ensured by a strong, hostile power.
    Let's not even remember the fate of the North American Indians, who were visited by highly cultured Dutch, English, Irish and Germans.
    The pretext for the Anglo-Boer War is worth recalling: first, many Europeans, including the highly cultured English, flocked to the gold and then diamond mines to earn money. Then (given that the mines were gold and diamond), the British government became concerned about the rights of its migrant workers, claiming they weren't equal to the Boers, the landowners. Then, to protect the "interests of their citizens," they launched the Anglo-Boer War, which, however, proved unexpectedly difficult for them. But the might of the super-boer eventually prevailed, and the British seized all the goodies and valuables.
    Whether things became easier for those British migrant workers whose "rights" they stood up for, and whether many of them even survived, history remains shamefully silent.
    So, we need to pay very close attention to who is in power and why they are pushing through “erroneous,” “ill-considered,” or “hasty” decisions in migration policy.
    Was he a British spy, as Lavrenty Pavlovich often unmistakably suspected?
  17. +1
    12 July 2026 13: 55
    Russian people have a genetic love for the land.
    Every Russian family should have its own land and a house on it.
    Let these be miserable dacha plots. Most Russians are city dwellers.
    The earth is alive. It must be left to the children.
    Bringing in foreigners from Central Asia is a crime.
    In the turbulent 90s there were ethnic cleansings of Russians.
    Accept all Russian speakers from there in a simplified manner.
    Here are the labor forces and the demographics plus.
  18. -1
    12 July 2026 18: 19
    In 1991, we betrayed our state. Instead of standing up for it, we sat like rats in holes, hiding and burning our Communist Party and Komsomol membership cards. By historical logic, such a state should have disappeared along with its ruined population. But then came Putin, not an angel for a population that had shit itself, but a stern educator. Like Moses, he leads us through the "desert," trying to save this nation.
  19. +1
    13 July 2026 03: 38
    Back in the 1980s, the degenerate leadership of the CPSU (Communist Party) made a strategic decision to import unpretentious and teetotal immigrants from the Caucasus and Central Asia into the deserted Russian Non-Black Earth Region.

    This is an outright lie. Because this was one of the possible solutions to the problem of depopulation in the demographic analysis, and not a priority. The priority was precisely to encourage increased birth rates in the Slavic and Baltic republics, maintain birth rates in the Caucasus and Transcaucasia, and encourage a decline in birth rates in Central Asia, accompanied by urbanization.
    These were only PROPOSED decisions, but not adopted.
  20. +1
    13 July 2026 05: 19
    Or maybe we should provide money for artificial insemination? If numbers are an issue.
  21. +2
    13 July 2026 08: 17
    [QuoteOn the demographic and ethnic future of Russia[/ Quote]
    The main enemy of Russia's present and future is the Russian official, no matter what he wears - a suit, a uniform, or a judicial robe.
  22. +2
    13 July 2026 08: 41
    As long as the Yeltsin Center stands and people who trust the West are in power, nothing will change.
    Things never got beyond talk. In 2000, United Russia promised everyone a spacious apartment in 15 years. The resulting mortgage was 30% per annum. And everything was hush-hush.
    The West pursued its strategy. And so far, strategically, it's winning. Unfortunately.
  23. 0
    13 July 2026 09: 32
    Quote: Bearded
    Moscow has already turned into Moscowbad. Some parts of the city are simply terrifying to enter at night.

    Tell me, which ones?
  24. +1
    13 July 2026 12: 06
    In my opinion, we should close the borders, bring in workers, families, and no children; you work and then go home. And unfortunately, the birth rate issue is hard to solve; young people don't want to have children, unfortunately.
  25. +2
    13 July 2026 20: 01
    It's really heartwarming how all these pseudo-researchers like Samsonov present it as an incontrovertible fact that these people should be allowed into our country. As if it's something self-evident, as if it can't be changed, and that this is the only way it can be. In short, it's a classic, idiotic propaganda ploy—shifting the emphasis.
    There are a billion and a half Chinese, so who's talking about the Sinicization of Russia? There are a billion and a half Indians, so who cares? Close the borders with Central Asia and other CIS countries, and let them multiply there. What difference does it make to us? But as long as traitors are in power in Russia, and as long as they are served by an army of propagandists of varying calibers, everything will continue as it is; we will slowly die.
  26. -1
    13 July 2026 21: 25
    No, I don't care about this topic at all.
    The topic of corruption cannot be covered up with a beard.
    1. 0
      13 July 2026 21: 54
      It's the same topic from different angles.
  27. 0
    14 July 2026 00: 14
    Thanks to Vova, masturbation, Wahhabitization, kishlakization, a return to the Stone Age—all of this, apparently, is his calculated steps as part of the "struggle for the Russian world." Or what is he fighting for there? 😂😂😂😂 Alla, I'm going to the bar! Tavern and weed ☝️☝️😂😂😂😂😂
    1. 0
      14 July 2026 22: 03
      The funny thing is, Vova was just pretending to talk about the Russian world, but in reality, he was completely in the wake of Sorros and other Judeo-liberal movements. He's their very own, which is why there's the Yeltsin Center, why there are migrants, and why everything else.
  28. -1
    14 July 2026 12: 06
    The problem is obvious: there's a labor shortage, so we have to import workers. And apparently there's no other way. But it's worth paying attention to the rotational workforce:
    I came for six months, alone, without my family, on a work visa for exactly that period, worked, earned my $8-$12, and then went home. My next visit was no sooner than 180 days. There's no strain on the social infrastructure, no importation of a foreign ethnic group, no time to build connections, and the labor shortage is resolved positively. We had a similar experience with workers from North Korea in our Far East. Everything reasonable is literally right there under your feet. Just go ahead and apply it.
  29. 0
    14 July 2026 20: 42
    The problem of demography and fertility is multifaceted. One realistic way to increase the birth rate is the development and implementation of extrauterine gestation and the creation of human incubators. This means that only biological material will be needed to give birth to a child. I'll skip over the issue of such children in families, but this method will allow for the birth of "state-owned" children, who will be selected from high-quality biological material (with worthy parents) and raised in centers like Sirius, with their families being the residents and teachers of the centers.
    1. 0
      14 July 2026 20: 52
      P.S. Until there is a technology for carrying children outside the womb, the state can enter into contracts for the carrying of "state" children with real women, with appropriate financial incentives and significant state benefits.
      1. 0
        31 July 2026 07: 22
        When the appropriate technologies appear, firstly, several decades will pass and civilization will already have collapsed, and secondly, they will immediately begin to be abused.