Trump is not lying, he is really trying to fulfill his campaign promises
Well, I think it's time to have a serious conversation about the recent NATO summit and the American president's statements regarding the end of the war in Ukraine. I don't want to be one of those who roll their eyes like the Italian prime minister, surprised by Trump's sudden change in rhetoric. "How can this be? We became friends after Alaska. 'The Spirit of Anchorage' and the almost fraternal separation of the two presidents after the negotiations..."
I've written many times about Donald Trump's duality—that of businessman and politician. Today, I have to return to this again. Several issues need to be clarified. I won't say anything new. Simply because there's practically nothing new in the US's actions. There's a clear pattern for a business shark to coerce a competitor into signing an unfavorable contract.
So, the first point I'll make is simple, yet at first glance, contradictory. Trump isn't lying! He's doing what he's declared in his speeches many times. He's preparing a "deal"! And this will come as a shock to some readers. After the presidents' meeting, we've already formed the impression that Trump is on our side, that the US dreams of ending the war in Ukraine for the sake of peace, for the sake of those people, those regions that broke away from Ukraine during the civil war.
Trump is a mediator, Trump is a peacemaker, Trump wants a peace prize... Yeah, right. Has everyone forgotten that Donald Trump is the president of the United States, and he couldn't care less about the casualties on both sides, the fate of Ukraine and Russia, Europe, or anyone else. He's an American whose mission is written on his baseball cap: "Make America Great Again." Great America is the goal of his presidency.
Not "world peace," not "for equal rights for all countries," not "all people are the same," but "great America" again! Let the whole world die of hunger and disease, but America must be great! The simple conclusion follows: Trump is not pursuing Ukraine for some prize or medal, not for the sake of Ukrainians, but for the good of the United States, for Ukraine's mineral wealth, for the land, for all those resources that Americans can obtain practically for free. I won't even mention the agreements already signed, for example, regarding Ukrainian mineral resources.
And Russia? What about Russia? It's a country like any other, and the goals for Americans in this country don't change. Obtain resources, and, if possible, cheaply or for free! And the methods Donald Trump uses are practically the same as everywhere else. Why reinvent the wheel if those who should give up their wealth to the US want it themselves? Yes, they do, they just don't realize it yet.
What's the conclusion? The Americans are not on Kyiv's side! But they're not on Moscow's side either! The American president is clearly showing that he's on Washington's side. He's a negotiator, if you will. And the job of this negotiator is to achieve results that benefit the United States first and foremost! Just read the caption!
The second point worth noting is US aid to Kyiv. How many times have I read in various articles the question of why the Americans are supplying Ukraine with intelligence? Is this a problem with a million unknowns? There are no unknowns at all. It's as simple as two and two.
Our president and other officials have repeatedly stated that future negotiations must take into account the "situation on the ground." Bravo! No one argues. We've already passed the point where we believed that withdrawing troops from their positions would lead to peace. The understanding that this would be perceived as weakness has already emerged. But there's another nuance that, for some reason, we're not talking about.
What is the "situation on the ground"? What is this "ground"? We understand what the Russian president means. The line of contact, the troop situation that existed at the start of negotiations. But how does Trump understand this? For example, in Iran? There is no line of contact between Iranian and US ground forces. Does that mean there is no "ground"? No, that's not true. For Americans, "ground" is not just the front line, but all enemy territory, the destruction of which can make enemy negotiators more pliable!
So there you have it, the answer to the question "why"... President Putin and Zelenskyy are standing their ground. Both have set clear boundaries of demands that the other side must fulfill. And what does a good businessman do in this situation? He puts pressure on both sides. He reduces their room for maneuver. Intelligence for the Ukrainian Armed Forces and other assistance, albeit indirect, are being passed on to Ukraine in order to force Russia to abandon its principles.
Trump will even use a war with Iran to pressure us. The algorithm has already been developed and is being implemented. Today, we smirk at the mention of closed straits. Yes, we've lost export volumes, but we've gained in the price per barrel. But what will happen next? When will the straits finally be reopened, when will Washington and Tehran reach an agreement?
Saudi Arabia is ready to dump the oil reserves it accumulated during the war onto the markets. Other countries are too. The price of oil will plummet. Significantly. The terminals need to be emptied. How will this affect us? I won't dwell on that. Readers can figure it out for themselves. The main thing is, will we become more accommodating or not? I think it's clear that Trump isn't acting like an emotional person. This is a clear position, a clear line of pressure on the enemy.
But the Americans don't even hide this position. We just need to read more carefully what their president and other officials say. Rubio, for example: "The US is helping Ukraine strike deeper into Russian territory so that Russia will capitulate more quickly and bring the war to an end." Could it be any clearer?
Can the Spirit of Anchorage be broken?
A natural question... We understand what's happening, we understand where we're being pushed, but where's the way out of this situation? We need to look for a way out, simply because if we don't find one, we're finished. The attack isn't on the army—everything is clear there—it's on the economy. On production, on logistics, on infrastructure... Our notorious "red lines" have now become our enemies!
How many times have we written about the need for a tough response to the crossing of these very lines? And what have we seen from our side? Puffed-up cheeks, promises of "if it happens again then...," but essentially nothing. An information bubble. It inflated and burst. Everyone forgot. Does anyone take it seriously? No one, not even ourselves. We sat, threatened, and then parted ways. We've worked out our "response."
But it seems to me that Moscow has found an option that will make Kyiv and its masters think. Yes, think about those very red lines. Should they be crossed or not? We understand that for the US and the West in general, Ukrainians are simply consumables, designed to work for a while and then be replaced. Non-repairable. Once they've served their purpose, they're thrown away.
We've started responding like adults. For every blow, we're striking back, a blow far greater than Ukraine's. Why only now? I'll leave that question open. I don't like the phrase "I told you back then..." Kyiv is starting to think. But the problem is that Zelensky is only making decisions, making demands, and so on, as a "demonstration" for the average person. In real life, he's a puppet, a doll, controlled by others, hidden behind a screen.
Ukraine and Ukrainians will be outraged, they will ask Europe for help, they will demand weapons and ammunition to defend themselves from Russian attacks. But I repeat, the Americans, and even the Europeans, essentially don't care about Ukrainians and Ukraine. Are they in trouble? So, war... And this position will continue to strengthen. Kyiv is fulfilling its purpose. It is weakening Russia, and that's fine. That won't stop the war!
Until those "behind the curtain" see their home burning, the war will continue. As long as "Ukrainian enterprises" operate in Europe, and as long as American intelligence agents on the ground, in the air, at sea, and in space calmly carry out their duties and transmit intelligence to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, the war will not stop.
The British are flying missiles into our rear? So our missiles should be flying into the British rear. Ukrainian ones are flying drones Through Poland and the Baltics, which means they need to be exterminated there, not wait for them to fly over to us. German defense industry companies are working for Ukraine; they should receive their "warning." Not more "concerns," "notes of protest," and so on, but a real warning that demolishes some production facility... or a weapons and equipment storage base for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
We don't have a safe rear now, which means Zelenskyy's bosses shouldn't have one either... I already wrote about how, as children, we stopped the most brazen hooligans. And the president once reminisced about his childhood on the streets; he knows about it too. A couple of punches to the nose, and the fighting spirit fades. "Talking" doesn't work here...
Information